Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:28:47.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Crustal-Scale Stress Modelling to Investigate Glacially Triggered Faulting

from Part VI - Modelling of Glacially Induced Faults and Stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

By
Sofie Gradmann  and
Rebekka Steffen
Edited by
Holger Steffen ,
Odleiv Olesen  and
Raimo Sutinen
Holger Steffen
Affiliation:
Lantmäteriet, Sweden
Odleiv Olesen
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Norway
Raimo Sutinen
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Finland
Get access

Summary

Modelling of stresses that influence glacially triggered faulting has progressed substantially in the last decades with more complex models and improved modelling techniques, incorporation of a variety of relevant processes, better constraints of ice-loading history, higher model resolution and 3D geometries. Some recent developments are collected in this section to portray the scope and variability of numerical modelling relevant to glacially triggered faulting. These range from modelling of the general in situ stress field to studies on the stress field induced by glacial loading and unloading.

An appropriate estimation of the ambient background stress field is crucial for determining the effect of additional ice loading (or unloading) on pre-stressed faults. Contributions from local and far-field stress sources (topography, tectonics) need to be reconciled with in situ measurements from boreholes and fault-plane solutions from earthquakes. We describe the different types of stresses in glaciated regions with a focus on Scandinavia together with the techniques used to incorporate stresses into numerical models.

Keywords

Stress FieldFinite Element ModellingGravityOverburden StressTectonic StressGeodynamic StressThermal StressPore-Fluid PressureFlexure
Type
Chapter
Information
Glacially-Triggered Faulting , pp. 402 - 416
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amadei, B. and Stephansson, O. (1997). Rock Stress and Its Measurement. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Amini, S., Roberts, R., Raeesi, M. et al. (2018). Fault slip and identification of the second fault plane in the Varzeghan earthquake doublet. Journal of Seismology, 22, 815–831, doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9734-0.Google Scholar
Barton, C. A. and Zoback, M. D. (1994). Stress perturbations associated with active faults penetrated by boreholes: possible evidence for near‐complete stress drop and a new technique for stress magnitude measurement. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 9373–9390, doi.org/10.1029/93JB03359.Google Scholar
Bell, J. S. and Wu, P. (1997). High horizontal stresses in Hudson Bay, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 34(7), 949–957, doi.org/10.1139/e17-079.Google Scholar
Brown, E.T. and Hoek, E. (1978). Trends in relationships between measured in-situ stresses and depth. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 15(4), 211–215, doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)91227-5.Google Scholar
Brudy, M., Zoback, M. D., Fuchs, K., Rummel, F. and Baumgartner, J. (1997). Estimation of the complete stress tensor to 8 km depth in the KTB scientific drill holes: implications for the crustal strength. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 18453–18475, doi.org/10.1029/96JB02942.Google Scholar
Buchmann, T. J. and Connolly, P. T. (2007). Contemporary kinematics of the Upper Rhine Graben: a 3D finite element approach. Global and Planetary Change, 58(1), 287–309, doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.02.012.Google Scholar
Buffett, B. and Becker, T. W. (2012). Bending stress and dissipation in subducted lithosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research – Solid Earth, 117, B05413, doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrkjeland, U., Bungum, H. and Eldholm, O. (2000). Seismotectonics of the Norwegian continental margin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 105(B3), 6221–6236, doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900275.Google Scholar
Fejerskov, M. and Lindholm, C. (2000). Crustal stress in and around Norway: an evaluation of stress-generating mechanisms. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 167(1), 451–467, doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.167.01.19.Google Scholar
Fjeldskaar, W., Lindholm, C., Dehls, J.F. and Fjeldskaar, I. (2000). Postglacial uplift, neotectonics and seismicity in Fennoscandia. Quaternary Science Reviews, 19(14), 1413–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradmann, S., Olesen, O., Keiding, M. and Maystrenko, Y. (2018). The regional 3D stress field of Nordland, northern Norway – insights from numerical modelling. In O. Olesen et al., eds., Neotectonics in Nordland – Implications for petroleum exploration (NEONOR2). NGU Report 2018.010, 215–240.Google Scholar
Gritto, R., Dreger, D. Heidbach, O. and Hutchings, L. (2014). Towards the Understanding of Induced Seismicity in Enhanced Geothermal Systems. Technical Report DE-EE0002756, Array Information Technology, Greenbelt (MD), United States, doi.org/10.2172/1154937.Google Scholar
Grünthal, G. and Stromeyer, D. (1992). The recent crustal stress field in central Europe: trajectories and finite element modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97(B8), 11805–11820, doi.org/10.1029/91JB01963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. A. (1998). Introduction to special section: stress triggers, stress shadows, and implications for seismic hazard. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 103(10), 24347–24358, doi.org/10.1029/98JB01576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hast, N. (1958). The measurements of rock stress in mines. Swedish Geological Survey Publications 52-3. Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Heidbach, O., Hergert, T., Reiter, K. and Giger, S. (2014). Local Stress Field Sensitivity Analysis – Case Study Nördlich Lägern. Technical Report NAB 13-88, NAGRA – Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle.Google Scholar
Heidbach, O., Rajabi, M., Cui, X. et al. (2018). The World Stress Map database release 2016: crustal stress pattern across scales. Tectonophysics, 744, 484–498, doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.07.007.Google Scholar
Henk, A. (2020). Numerical modelling of faults. In Tanner, D. and Brandes, C., eds., Understanding Faults – Detecting, Dating, and Modeling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 147–165, doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815985-9.00004-7.Google Scholar
Hergert, T., Heidbach, O., Reiter, K., Giger, S. B. and Marschall, P. (2015). Stress field sensitivity analysis in a sedimentary sequence of the Alpine foreland, northern Switzerland. Solid Earth, 6(2), 533–552, doi.org/10.5194/se-6-533-2015.Google Scholar
Hergert, T. and Heidbach, O. (2011). Geomechanical model of the Marmara Sea region – II. 3-D contemporary background stress field. Geophysical Journal International, 185(3), 1090–1102, doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.04992.x.Google Scholar
Hickman, S. and Zoback, M. (2004). Stress orientations and magnitudes in the SAFOD pilot hole. Geophysical Research Letters, 31, doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020043.Google Scholar
Janutyte, I. and Lindholm, C. (2017). Earthquake source mechanisms in onshore and offshore Nordland, northern Norway. Norwegian Journal of Geology, 97(3), 227–239.Google Scholar
Jarosiński, M., Beekman, F., Bada, G. and Cloetingh, S. (2006). Redistribution of recent collision push and ridge push in Central Europe: insights from FEM modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 167, 860–880, doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02979.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, P., Wu, P. and Lambeck, K. (1998). Dependence of horizontal stress magnitude on load dimension in glacial rebound models. Geophysical Journal International, 132, 41–60, doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00387.x.Google Scholar
Klemann, V. and Wolf, D. (1998). Modelling of stresses in the Fennoscandian lithosphere induced by Pleistocene glaciations. Tectonophysics, 294(3-4), 291–303, doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00107-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, C. R. B. (1986). Differential thermal stresses in the Earth. Geophysical Journal International, 86(2), 319–330, doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1986.tb03831.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, B. (2005). Effects of Deglaciation on the Crustal Stress Field and Implications for Endglacial Faulting: A Parametric Study of Simple Earth and Ice Models. SKB Technical Report TR-05-04, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, 68 pp.Google Scholar
Lund, B., Schmidt, P. and Hieronymus, C. (2009). Stress Evolution and Fault Stability during the Weichselian Glacial Cycle. SKB Technical Report TR-09-15, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, 106 pp.Google Scholar
Martel, S. (2016). Effects of small-amplitude periodic topography on combined stresses due to gravity and tectonics. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 89, 1–13, doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.07.026.Google Scholar
Maury, J., Cornet, F. H. and Cara, M. (2014). Influence of the lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary on the stress field northwest of the Alps. Geophysical Journal International, 199(2), 1006–1017, doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu289.Google Scholar
McCutchen, W. R. (1982). Some elements of a theory for in-situ stress. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 19(4), 201–203, doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(82)90890-7.Google Scholar
Michalek, J., Tjåland, N., Drottning, A. et al. (2018). Report on seismic observations within the NEONOR2 project in the Nordland region, Norway (August 2013–May 2016). In O. Olesen et al., eds., Neotectonics in Nordland – Implications for Petroleum Exploration (NEONOR2). NGU Report 2018.010, 63 pp.Google Scholar
Myrvang, A. M. (1993). Rock stress and rock stress problems in Norway. In Hudson, J. A., ed., Comprehensive Rock Engineering, Vol. 3. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 461–471.Google Scholar
Mondy, L. S., Rey, P. F., Duclaux, G. and Moresi, L. (2018). The role of asthenospheric flow during rift propagation and breakup. Geology, 46(2), 103–106, doi.org/10.1130/G39674.1.Google Scholar
Naliboff, J. B., Lithgow-Bertelloni, C., Ruff, L. J. and de Koker, N. (2012). The effects of lithospheric thickness and density structure on Earth’s stress field. Geophysical Journal International, 188(1), 1–17, doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05248.x.Google Scholar
Pascal, C. (2006). On the role of heat flow, lithosphere thickness and lithosphere density on gravitational potential stresses. Tectonophysics, 425, 83–99, doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.07.012.Google Scholar
Pascal, C., Roberts, D. and Gabrielsen, R. H. (2010). Tectonic significance of present-day stress relief phenomena in formerly glaciated regions. Journal of the Geological Society, 167, 363–371, doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492009-136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, K. and Heidbach, O. (2014). 3-D geomechanical-numerical model of the contemporary crustal stress state in the Alberta Basin (Canada). Solid Earth, 5(2), 1123–1149, doi.org/10.5194/se-5-1123-2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheorey, P. (1994). A theory for in situ stresses in isotropic and transverseley isotropic rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics, 31(1), 23–34, doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(94)92312-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffen, H. and Wu, P. (2011). Glacial isostatic adjustment in Fennoscandia – a review of data and modelling. Journal of Geodynamics, 52, 169-204, doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2011.03.002.Google Scholar
Steffen, R., Eaton, D. W. and Wu, P. (2012). Moment tensors, state of stress and their relation to post-glacial rebound in northeastern Canada. Geophysical Journal International, 189, 1741-1752, doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05452.x.Google Scholar
Steffen, R., Wu, P., Steffen, H. and Eaton, D. W. (2014). On the implementation of faults in finite-element glacial isostatic adjustment models. Computers & Geosciences, 62, 150–159, doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.06.012.Google Scholar
Steffen, H., Steffen, R. and Tarasov, L. (2019). Modelling of glacially-induced stress changes in Latvia, Lithuania and the Kaliningrad District of Russia. Baltica, 32(1), 78–90, doi.org/10.5200/baltica.2019.1.7.Google Scholar
Stein, S., Cloetingh, S., Sleep, N. and Wortel, R. (1989). Passive margin earthquakes, stresses and rheology. In Gregersen, S. and Basham, P., eds., Earthquakes at North-Atlantic Passive Margins: Neotectonics and Postglacial Rebound, NATO ASI Series C 266, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 231–259.Google Scholar
Stephansson, O. (1993). Stress in the Fennoscandian Shield. In Hudson, J. A., Ed., Rock Testing and Site Characterization. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 445–459, doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042066-0.50024-0.Google Scholar
Townend, J. and Zoback, M. D. (2000). How faulting keeps the crust strong. Geology, 28(5), 399–402, doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<399:HFKTCS>2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
Turcotte, D. and Schubert, G. (2014). Geodynamics, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wu, P. and Hasegawa, H. S. (1996a). Induced stresses and fault potential in eastern Canada due to a disc load: a preliminary analysis. Geophysical Journal International, 125(2), 415–430, doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb00008.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, P. and Hasegawa, H. S. (1996b). Induced stresses and fault potential in eastern Canada due to a realistic load: a preliminary analysis. Geophysical Journal International, 127(1), 215–229, doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb01546.x.Google Scholar
Wu, P., Johnston, P. and Lambeck, K. (1999). Postglacial rebound and fault instability in Fennoscandia. Geophysical Journal International, 139, 657–670, doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00963.x.Google Scholar
Yale, D. P. (2003). Fault and stress magnitude controls on variations in the orientation of in situ stress. In M. S. Ameen, ed., Fracture and In-Situ Stress Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs. Geological Society, London, Special Publication, Vol. 209, pp. 55–64, doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.209.01.06.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Person, M., Voller, V. et al. (2018). Hydromechanical impacts of Pleistocene glaciations on pore fluid pressure evolution, rock failure, and brine migration within sedimentary basins and the crystalline basement. Water Resources Research, 54, doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022464.Google Scholar
Zoback, M. L., Zoback, M., Adams, J. et al. (1989). Global patterns of tectonic stress. Nature, 341, 291–298, doi.org/10.1038/341291a0.Google Scholar
Zoback, M. L. (1992). First and second order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: the World Stress Map Project. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 11703–11728, doi.org/10.1029/92jb00132.Google Scholar
Zoback, M. D. and Townend, J. (2001). Implications of hydrostatic pore pressures and high crustal strength for the deformation of intraplate lithosphere. Tectonophysics, 336, 19–30, doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00091-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoback, M. L. and Zoback, M. D. (2015). Lithosphere stress and deformation. In Schubert, G., ed., Treatise on Geophysics. Crust and Lithosphere Dynamics, Vol. 6, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 253–273.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×