Book contents
- Immigration and the American Ethos
- Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology
- Immigration and the American Ethos
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Prologue
- 1 What Do Americans Want from Immigration Policy, and Why?
- 2 Civic Fairness and Group-Centrism
- 3 Functional Assimilation, Humanitarianism, and Support for Legal Admissions
- 4 Civic Fairness and the Legal–Illegal Divide
- 5 Civic Fairness and Ethnic Stereotypes
- 6 Assimilation, Civic Fairness and the “Circle of We”
- 7 Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Books in the series
2 - Civic Fairness and Group-Centrism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2020
- Immigration and the American Ethos
- Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology
- Immigration and the American Ethos
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Prologue
- 1 What Do Americans Want from Immigration Policy, and Why?
- 2 Civic Fairness and Group-Centrism
- 3 Functional Assimilation, Humanitarianism, and Support for Legal Admissions
- 4 Civic Fairness and the Legal–Illegal Divide
- 5 Civic Fairness and Ethnic Stereotypes
- 6 Assimilation, Civic Fairness and the “Circle of We”
- 7 Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Books in the series
Summary
In this chapter, we develop a framework for understanding how Americans’ opinions about immigration policy issues emerge from their conceptions of civic fairness. We then review leading theories of immigration attitudes that are premised on group-centrism, with an eye to considering (1) what questions they leave open about the relative influence of considerations rooted in political values and group allegiances and animosities, (2) what challenges they pose to the civic fairness framework, and (3) where they lay claim to empirical phenomena that could also be explained by conceptions of civic fairness. Finally, from this discussion we derive several hypotheses that guide the empirical tests in the chapters that follow. These hypotheses apply to situations where values collide with group loyalties to race and nation, which is to say instances in which the civic fairness and group-centrist perspectives make distinct predictions about what immigration policy alternatives Americans will choose.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Immigration and the American Ethos , pp. 25 - 60Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020