Bibliography

Shai Dothan

doi:10.1017/9781108771795.008

Ackerman, Bruce & Fishkin, James, Deliberation Day (2004).Google Scholar

Barak, Aharon, Judicial Discretion (1987) (Hebrew).Google Scholar

Barak, Aharon, Purposive Interpretation in Law (2003) (Hebrew).Google Scholar

Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights – From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights ( 2010 ).CrossRef Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, The Law of Global Governance (2014).Google Scholar

Bickel, Alexander M., The Least Dangerous Branch – The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (2d ed., 1986).Google Scholar

Bjorge, Eirik, The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties ( 2014 ).CrossRef Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin & Venzke, Ingo, In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication ( 2014 ).Google Scholar

Bowring, Bill, The Degradation of the International Legal Order? The Rehabilitation of Law and the Possibility of Politics (2008).Google Scholar

Burt, Ronald S., Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital ( 2005 ).Google Scholar

Comparative International Law (Roberts, Anthea et al., eds., 2018).Google Scholar

Conant, Lisa J., Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union ( 2002 ).Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin, European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (2015)CrossRef Google Scholar

Van Dijk, P. & Van Hoof, G. J. H., Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights (3d ed., 1998).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram, International Treaties (1974) (Hebrew).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, Reputation and Judicial Tactics: A Theory of National and International Courts (2015).Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart, Democracy and Distrust – A Theory of Judicial Review ( 1980 ).Google Scholar

Fabbrini, Federico, Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in a Comparative Perspective ( 2014 ).Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack L. & Posner, Eric A., The Limits of International Law (2005).CrossRef Google Scholar

Gomien, Donna, Harris, David, & Zwaak, Leo, Law and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Social Charter ( 1996 ).Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T., How International Law Works – A Rational Choice Theory (2008).CrossRef Google Scholar

Harris, D. J., O’boyle, M., & Warbrick, C., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights ( 1995 ).Google Scholar

Hillebrecht, Courtney, Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance (2014)CrossRef Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty – Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (1970).Google Scholar

Hodson, Loveday, NGOs and the Struggle for Human Rights in Europe (2011).Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (2008).Google Scholar

Kleffner, Jann K., Complementarity in the Rome Statute and National Criminal Jurisdictions (2008).CrossRef Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (2005).Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court ( 1958 ).Google Scholar

Legg, Andrew, The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (2012).Google Scholar

Merrills, J. G., The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights (2d ed.,1993).Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action (1965).Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur, The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities ( 1982 ).Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (2008).Google Scholar

Ovey, Clare & White, Robin C. A., Jacobs & White: The European Convention on Human Rights (4th ed., 2006).Google Scholar

Posner, Eric A., The Perils of Global Legalism ( 2009 ).Google Scholar

Schmidt, Susanne K., The European Court of Justice and the Policy Process: The Shadow of Case Law (2018).Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey A. & Spaeth, Harold J., The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (2002).Google Scholar

Shearer, Ivan. A. Starke’s International Law (11th ed., 1994).Google Scholar

Sikkink, Kathryn, The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics ( 2011 ).Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order ( 2004 ).Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, The Chessboard and the Web: Strategies of Connection in a Networked World (2017).Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. R. & Hastie, Reid, Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter (2015).Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (2000).Google Scholar

The International Court: Challenges to Achieving Justice and Accountability in the 21st Century (Ellis, Mark S. & Goldstone, Richard J., eds., 2008).Google Scholar

Vermeule, Adrian, Law and the Limits of Reason (2009).Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, The Brighton Aftermath and the Changing Role of the European Court of Human Rights, 9 J. Int’l Dispute Settlement 223 (2018).Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce A., Beyond Carolene Products, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 713 (1985).Google Scholar

Alexander, James F., The International Criminal Court and the Prevention of Atrocities: Predicting the Court’s Impact, 54 Vill. L. Rev. 1 (2009).Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., Helfer, Laurence R., & Madsen, Mikael Rask, How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts, 79 L. & Contemp. Prob. 1 (2016).Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J. & Vargas, Jeannette, Explaining Variation in the Use of European Litigation Strategies: European Community Law and British Gender Equality Policy, 33 Comp. Pol. Stud. 452 (2000).Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, The Differences that Make a Difference: Recent Developments on the Discrimination Grounds and the Margin of Appreciation under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 14 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 647 (2014).Google Scholar

Bassok, Or, Missing in Action: The Human Eye in Constitutions Across Borders in the Struggle against Terrorism 283 (Fabbrini, Federico & Jackson, Vicki, eds., 2016).CrossRef Google Scholar

Bassok, Or & Dotan, Yoav, Solving the Countermajoritarian Difficulty? 11 Int’l J. Conn. Law 13 (2013).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, Exit and Voice in the Age of Globalization, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 167 (1999).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts, 4 Eur. J. Int’l. L. 159 (1993).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, Judicial Review and Democratic Failures: Minimizing Asymmetric Information through Adjudication, 32 Tel. Aviv. Uni. L. Rev. 277 (Hebrew) (2010).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, Margin of Appreciation, Consensus and Universal Standards, 31 NYU J. Int’l L. Pol. 843, 849 (1999).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts, 102 Amer. J. Int’l L. 241 (2008).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders, 107 Amer. J. Int’l L. 295 (2013).CrossRef Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George W., National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law, 20 Eur. J. Int’l L. 59 (2009).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George, The Premises, Assumptions and Implications of Van Gend en Loos: Viewed from the Perspectives of Democracy and Legitimacy of International Institutions, 25 Eur. J. Int’l L. 85 (2014).Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Rudolf, Evolutive Treaty Interpretation, Especially of the European Convention on Human Rights, 42 German Y. B. Int’l L. 11 (1999).Google Scholar

Bernstein, Lisa, Opting Out of The Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry, 21 J. Legal Stud. 115 (1992).Google Scholar

Brauch, Jeffrey A., The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law, 11 Colum. J. Eur. L. 113 (2005).Google Scholar

Briggs, Herbert W., United States Ratification of the Vienna Treaty Convention, 73 Amer. J. I. L. 470 (1979).Google Scholar

Candia, Gonzalo, Comparing Diverse Approaches to the Margin of Appreciation: The Case of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2406705.Google Scholar

Carozza, Paolo G., Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law in International Human Rights: Some Reflections on the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, 73 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1217 (1998).Google Scholar

Cartier, Stéphanie & Hoss, Cristina, The Role of Registries and Legal Secretariats in International Judicial Institutions, in The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication 712 (Romano, Cesare P.R. et al., eds., 2013).Google Scholar

Cavallaro, James L. & Brewer, Stephanie Erin, Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court, 102 Am. J. Int’l. L. 768 (2008).Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram, The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation, 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1281 (1976).Google Scholar

Cogan, Jacob Katz, Competition and Control in International Adjudication, 48 Va. J. Int’l L. 411 (2008).Google Scholar

Cohen, Amichai, Legal Operational Advice in the Israeli Defense Forces: The International Law Department and the Changing Nature of International Humanitarian Law, 26 Conn. J. Int’l L. 367 (2011).Google Scholar

Dagan, Hanoch, The Realist Conception of Law, 57 Uni. Toronto. L.J. 607 (2007).Google Scholar

Davenport, David, International Criminal Court: 12 Years, $1 Billion, 2 Convictions, Forbes Mar. 12, 2014.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Sara & Dezalay, Yves, Professionals of International Justice: From the Shadow of State Diplomacy to the Pull of the Market for Commercial Arbitration, in International Law as a Profession 311 (eds. Jean D’Aspremont et al, 2017).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, The Advantage of International Courts, 31 Bar Ilan University Law Review 675 ( 2018 ) (Hebrew).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, Comparative Views on the Right to Vote in International Law: The Case of Prisoners’ Disenfranchisement, in Comparative International Law 379 (Roberts, Anthea et al., eds., Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, In Defence of Expansive Interpretation in the European Court of Human Rights, 3 Cambridge J. Int’l & Comp. L. 508 (2014).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, Deterring War Crimes, 40 N. C. J. Int’l L. & Com. Reg. 739 ( 2015 ).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, How International Courts Enhance Their Legitimacy, 14 Theo. Inq. L. 455 (2013).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, International Courts Improve Public Deliberation, 39 Mich. J. Int’l L. 217 ( 2018 ).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights, 12 Chi. J. Int’l. L. 115 (2011).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, Luring NGOs to International Courts: A Comment on CLR v. Romania, 75 Heidelberg J. Int’l L. 635 ( 2015 ).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, The Motivations of Individual Judges and How They Act as a Group, 19 German L.J. 2165 (2018).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, The Optimal Use of Comparative Law, 43 Denv. J. Int’l L. & Pol’y. 21 (2014).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, Social Networks and the Enforcement of International Law, in Edward Elgar Research Handbook on the Sociology of International Law 333 (Hirsch, Moshe & Lang, Andrew, eds., 2018).CrossRef Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, Three Interpretive Constraints on the European Court of Human Rights, in The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference 227 (Kanetake, Machiko & Nollkaemper, André, eds., Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, The Three Traditional Approaches to Treaty Interpretation: A Current Application to the European Court of Human Rights, 42 Fordham Int’l L.J. 765 (2019).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai, A Virtual Wall of Shame: The New Way of Imposing Reputational Sanctions on Defiant States, 27 Duke J. Comp. & Int’l. L. 141 ( 2017 ).Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai & Jemielniak, Joanna, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanisms in Investors’ Disputes forthcoming Eur. YB. Int’l Economic L. (2020).Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Trachtman, Joel P., The Law and Economics of Humanitarian Law Violations in Internal Conflict, 93 Amer. J. Int’l L. 394 (1999).Google Scholar

Easton, Susan, The Prisoner’s Right to Vote and Civic Responsibility: Reaffirming the Social Contract? 56 Probation J. 224 (2009).Google Scholar

Enten, Harry J., Felon Voting Rights Have a Bigger Impact on Elections than Voter ID Laws, The Guardian July 31, 2013.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, & Martin, Andrew D., The Political (Science) Context of Judging, 47 St. Louis U. L.J. 783 (2003).Google Scholar

Eskridge, William N. Jr., Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game, 79 Cal. L. Rev. 613 (1991).Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen M., Foreword: The Forms of Justice, 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1979).CrossRef Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen M., The Social and Political Foundations of Adjudication, 6 Law & Hum. Behav. 121 (1982).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Malgosia & Merkouris, Panos, Canons of Treaty Interpretation: Selected Case Studies from the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement, in Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on 153 (Fitzmaurice, Malgosia et al., eds., 2010).Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton, The Methodology of Positive Economics, Essays in Positive Economics 3 (1953).Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L., The Forms and Limits of Adjudication, 92 Harv. L. Rev. 353 (1978).Google Scholar

Gillman, Howard, What’s Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making, 26 L. & Soc. Inquiry 465 (2001).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking, 45 Va. J. Int’l L. 631 (2005).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, Eastphalia as the Perfection of Westphalia, 17 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 27 (2010).CrossRef Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom & McAdams, Richard H., Adjudication in Anarchy: an Expressive Theory of International Dispute Resolution, 45 Wm & Mary L. Rev. 1229 (2004).Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark, Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, 91 Amer. J. Socio. 481 (1985).CrossRef Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark, Threshold Models of Collective Behavior, 83 Amer. J. Soc. 1420 (1978).Google Scholar

Haas, Peter M., Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination, 46 Int’l Org. 1 (1992).Google Scholar

Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, & Feeley, Malcolm, Introduction: the Legal Complex in Struggles for Political Liberalism, in Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Change 1 (Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, & Feeley, Malcolm, eds., 2007).Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona A., Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law, 72 U. Chi. L. Rev. 469 (2005).Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R. & Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication, 107 Yale L.J. 273 (1997).Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R. & Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo, 93 Cal. L. Rev. 899 (2005).Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R. & Voeten, Erik, International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe, 68 Int’l Org. 77 (2014).Google Scholar

Heller, Kevin Jon, A Sentence-Based Theory of Complementarity, 53 Harv. Int’l L.J. 85 (2012).Google Scholar

Hentrei, Simon, Generalising the Principle of Complementarity: Framing International Judicial Authority, 4 Trans. Leg. Theo. 419 (2013).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Lord, The Universality of Human Rights, Judicial Studies Board Annual Lecture, Mar. 19, 2009, available at https://conservativehome.blogs.com/files/hoffmann_2009_jsb_annual_lecture_universality_of_human_rights.pdf.Google Scholar

Hofmann, Andreas, Is the Commission Levelling the Playing Field? Rights Enforcement in the European Union, 40 J. Eur. Integration 737 (2018).Google Scholar

von Holderstein Holtermann, Jakob, A “Slice of Cheese” – A Deterrence-Based Argument for the International Criminal Court, 11 Hum. Rts. Rev. 289 (2010).Google Scholar

Hough, Andrew, Prisoner Vote: What MPs Said in Heated Debate, The Telegraph, Feb. 11, 2011.Google Scholar

Huneeus, Alexandra, Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights, 44 Cornell Int’l. L.J. 493 (2011).Google Scholar

Huneeus, Alexandra, International Criminal Law by Other Means: The Quasi-Criminal Jurisdiction of International Courts, 107 Am. J. Int’l L. 1 (2013).Google Scholar

Jackson, Joshua L., Broniowski v. Poland: A Recipe for Increased Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights as a Supranational Constitutional Court, 39 Conn. L. Rev. 759 (2006).Google Scholar

Jacobs, Francis G., Varieties of Approach to Treaty Interpretation: With Special Reference to the Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties before the Vienna Diplomatic Conference, 18 Int’l. & Comp. L.Q. 318 (1969).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, & Stewart, Richard B., The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, 68 Law & Contemp. Prob. 15 (2005).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Politics of International Law, 1 Eur. J. Int’l L. 4 (1990).Google Scholar

Kornhauser, Lewis A. & Sager, Lawrence G., Unpacking the Court, 96 Yale L.J. 82 (1986).Google Scholar

Kosař, David, Selecting Strasburg Judges, in Selecting Europe’s Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts (Bobek, Michal, ed., 2015).Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju, How Is International Human Rights Law Enforced? 74 Ind. L.J. 1397 (1999).Google Scholar

Ku, Julian & Nzelibe, Jide, Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities, 84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 777 (2006).Google Scholar

Laumann, Edward O. & Youm, Yoosik, Racial/Ethnic Group Differences in the Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in the United States: A Network Explanation, 26 Sexually Transmitted Diseases 250 (1999).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties, 26 Brit. Y.B. Int’l. L. 48 (1949).Google Scholar

Law, David S., A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review, 97 Geo. L.J. 723 (2009).Google Scholar

Leckie, Scott, The Inter-State Complaint Procedure in International Human Rights Law: Hopeful Prospects or Wishful Thinking? 10 Hum. Rts Q. 249 (1988).Google Scholar

Linderfalk, Ulf, Is the Hierarchical Structure of Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention Real or Not? Interpreting the Rules of Interpretation, 54 Netherlands Int’l L. Rev. 133 (2007).Google Scholar

Lohmann, Susanne, An Information Rationale for the Power of Special Interests, 92 Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 809 (1998).Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask, Rebalancing European Human Rights: Has the Brighton Declaration Engendered a New Deal on Human Rights in Europe, 9 J. Int’l Dispute Settlement 199 (2018).Google Scholar

Mahoney, Paul, Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Sides of the Same Coin, 11 Hum. R. L.J. 57 (1990).Google Scholar

Matscher, F., Methods of Interpretation of the Convention, in The European System for The Protection of Human Rights 63 (Macdonald, R. St. J., Matscher, F., and Petzold, H., eds., 1993).Google Scholar

Mautner, Menachem, Luck in Courts, 9 Theo. Inq. L. 217 (2007).Google Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew D. & Scwartz, Thomas, Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms, 28 Amer. J. Pol. Sci. 165 (1984).Google Scholar

McGoldrick, Dominic, Criminal Trials before International Tribunals: Legality and Legitimacy in The Permanent International Criminal Court: Legal and Policy Issues (Studies in International Law) (Donnelly, Eric, McGoldrick, Dominic, and Rowe, Peter J., eds.) 9 (2004).Google Scholar

Miara, Lucja & Prais, Victoria, The Role of Civil Society in the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 5 Eur. Hum. Rt. L. Rev. 528 (2012).Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I., The Constitution, Social Rights, and Liberal Political Justification, 1 I-CON 13 (2003).Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew, The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe, 54 Int’l Org. 217 (2000).Google Scholar

O’Connell, Rory, Cinderella Comes to the Ball: Art 14 and the Right to Non-discrimination in the ECHR, 29 Leg. Stud. 211 (2009).Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, 14 Eur. J. Int’l L. 529 (2003).Google Scholar

Ost, François, The Original Canons of Interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights, in The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights: International Protection versus National Restrictions 283 (Delmas-Marty, Mireille, ed., 1992).Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A., & Wouters, Jan, An Introduction to Informal International Lawmaking, in Informal International Lawmaking 1 (Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A., & Wouters, Jan, eds., 2012).Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, Humanity as the A and Ω of. Sovereignty, 20 Eur. J. Int’l L. 513 (2009).Google Scholar

Polinsky, Mitchell & Shavell, Steven, The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law, 38 J. Econ. Lit. 45 (2000).Google Scholar

Popovic, Dragoljub, Prevailing of Judicial Activism over Self-Restraint in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, 42 Creighton L. Rev. 361 (2009).Google Scholar

Posner, Eric & Sunstein, Cass, The Law of Other States, 59 Stan. L. Rev. 131 (2006).Google Scholar

Posner, Eric A. & Yoo, John C., Judicial Independence in International Tribunals, 93 Cal. L. Rev. 1 (2005).Google Scholar

Posner, Eric A. & de Figueiredo, Miguel F. P., Is the International Court of Justice Biased? 34 J. Legal Stud. 599 (2005).Google Scholar

Pulkowski, Dirk, Structural Paradigms of International law, in The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity 51 (Broude, Tomer & Shany, Yuval, eds., 2008).Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert D., Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games, 42 Int’l Org. 427 ( 1988 ).Google Scholar

Ronen, Yaël & Naggan, Yael, Third Parties, in The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication 806 (Romano, Cesare, Alter, Karen, & Shany, Yuval, eds., 2013).Google Scholar

Ruth, Alexandra and Trilsch, Mirja, Bankovic v. Belgium (Admissibility), 97 Am. J. Int’l L 168 (2003).Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, Do Cases Make Bad Law? 73 Uni Chi. L. Rev 883 ( 2006 ).Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory & Ginsburg, Tom, The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship, 106 Am. J. Int’l L. 1 (2012).Google Scholar

Shany, Yuval, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach, 106 Amer. J. Int’l. L. 225 (2012).Google Scholar

Shany, Yuval, Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law? 16 Eur. J. Int’l L. 907 (2006).Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial Proceedings, 88 Am. J. Int’l. L. 611 (1994).CrossRef Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth A. & Danner, Allison, Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court, 64 Int’l Org. 225 (2010).Google Scholar

Slack, James, Social Ties Keep Rapists in Britain, Mail On Line Sept. 21, 2011.Google Scholar

Spano, Robert, Universality or Diversity of Human Rights: Strasburg in the Age of Subsidiarity, 14 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 487 (2014).Google Scholar

von Staden, Andreas, The Democratic Legitimacy of Judicial Review beyond the State: Normative Subsidiarity and Judicial Standards of Review, 10 Int’l J. Con. L. 1023 (2012).Google Scholar

Stearns, Maxwell L., The Condorcet Jury Theorem and Judicial Decisionmaking: A Reply to Saul Levmore, 3 Theo. Inq. L. 125 (2002).Google Scholar

Stiansen, Øyvind, Competition and Compliance: Electoral Uncertainty and Implementation of Judgments from the International Human Rights Judiciary (draft available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3116708).Google Scholar

Sumption, Lord, The 27th Sultan Azlan Shah Lecture, Kuala Lumpur: The Limits of Law (Nov. 20, 2013), www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-131120.pdf.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes, 110 Yale L.J. 71 (2000).Google Scholar

Thayer, James B., The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law, 7 Harv. L. Rev. 129 (1893).Google Scholar

Van den Bossche, Peter, NGO Involvement in the WTO: A Comparative Perspective, 11 J. Int’l. Econ. L. 717, 721 (2008).Google Scholar

Vauchez, Antoine, Communities of International Litigators, in The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication 655 (Romano, Cesare P. R. et al., eds., 2013).Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik, Public Opinion and the Legitimacy of International Courts, 14 Theo. Inq. L. 411 (2013).Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik, The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights, 102 am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 417 (2008).Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik, The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights, 61 Int’l. Org. 669 (2007).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefit of the International Rule of Law, 22 Eur. J. Int’l L. 315 (2011).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, The Core of the Case against Judicial Review, 115 Yale L.J. 1346 (2006).Google Scholar

Worstall, Tim, Misunderstanding Brexit–Scrapping the Human Rights Act for a British Bill of Rights, Forbes Aug. 23, 2016.Google Scholar

American Convention on Human RightsGoogle Scholar

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental FreedomsGoogle Scholar

Rome Statute of the International Criminal CourtGoogle Scholar

Statute of the Council of EuropeGoogle Scholar

Statute of the International Court of JusticeGoogle Scholar

Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for RwandaGoogle Scholar

The Treaty on the Functioning of the European UnionGoogle Scholar

Updated Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former YugoslaviaGoogle Scholar

Vienna Convention on Consular RelationsGoogle Scholar

Vienna Convention on the Law of TreatiesGoogle Scholar

Case of A. A. v. The United Kingdom, judgment of September 20, 2011.Google Scholar

Case of A, B, and C v. Ireland, judgment of December 16, 2010.Google Scholar

Case of Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. The United Kingdom, judgment of May 28, 1985 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) 94.Google Scholar

Airey v. Ireland, judgment of October 9, 1979, EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)32.Google Scholar

Al-Jedda v. The United Kingdom, Judgment of July 7, 2011, Reports of Judgments and Decisions EUR. Ct. H.R. 2011.Google Scholar

Al-Skeini and Others v. The United Kingdom, Judgment of July 7, 2011, Reports of Judgments and Decisions EUR. Ct. H.R. 2011.Google Scholar

Artico v. Italy, judgment of May 13, 1980 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)37.Google Scholar

Bankovic and others v. Belgium and Others, Decision of December 12, 2001, EUR. Ct. H.R. 2001-XII 333Google Scholar

Broniowski v. Poland, judgment of June 22, 2004, 2004-V EUR. Ct. H.R. 1.Google Scholar

Cossey case, judgment of September 27, 1990 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) 184.Google Scholar

CLR v. Romania, judgment of July 17, 2014, Reports of Judgments and Decisions EUR. Ct. H.R. 2014.Google Scholar

Cyprus v. Turkey, Judgment of May 10, 2001, Reports of Judgments and Decisions, 2001-IV.Google Scholar

Case of D. H. and Others v. The Czech Republic, judgment of February 7, 2006.Google Scholar

Case of D. H. and Others v. The Czech Republic, judgment of November 11, 2011, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2007-IV.Google Scholar

Case of Dickson v. The United Kingdom, judgment of December 4, 2007.Google Scholar

Dudgeon v. The United Kingdom, judgment of October 22, 1981 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) 45.Google Scholar

Case of Evans v. The United Kingdom, judgment of April 10, 2007.Google Scholar

Fairfield and Others v. The United Kingdom, Decision of March 8, 2005.Google Scholar

Golder v. The United Kingdom, App. No. 4451/70, Eur. Comm’n H.R., (ser. B no. 16) 1 June 1973.Google Scholar

Case of Golder v. The United Kingdom judgment of February 21, 1975 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)18.Google Scholar

Christine Goodwin v. The United Kingdom, judgment of July 11, 2002, 2002-VI EUR. Ct. H.R. 1.Google Scholar

Greens and MT v. United Kingdom, judgment of November 23, 2010, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2010.Google Scholar

Case of Haas v. The Netherlands, judgment of January 13, 2004, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2004-I.Google Scholar

Hirst v. The United Kingdom (No. 2), judgment of October 6, 2005, 2005-IX EUR. Ct. H.R. 187.Google Scholar

Case of Ireland v. The United Kingdom, judgment of January 18, 1978 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) 25.Google Scholar

Case of Klass and others Judgment of September 6, 1978 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)28.Google Scholar

Case of Leyla Sahin v. Turkey, judgment of November 10, 2005.Google Scholar

Case of Loizidou v. Turkey (Preliminary Objections) Judgment of March 23, 1995, EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser.A) 310.Google Scholar

Case of Loizidou v. Turkey, judgment of December 18, 1996 (merits) Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI.Google Scholar

Marckx v. Belgium, Judgment of June 13, 1979 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)31.Google Scholar

Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of March 25, 1983, EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)62.Google Scholar

Case of Othman (Abu Qatada) v. The United Kingdom, judgment of January 17, 2012, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2012.Google Scholar

Case “relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium” judgment of July 23, 1968 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) 6.Google Scholar

Rees v. The United Kingdom, judgment of October 17, 1986 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) 106.Google Scholar

S.A.S v. France, judgment of July 1, 2014Google Scholar

Sheffield and Horsham v. The United Kingdom, judgment of July 30, 1998, 1998-V EUR. Ct. H.R. 2011.Google Scholar

Soering case, judgment of 7 July 1989, EUR. Ct. H.R (ser. A)161.Google Scholar

Case of Stec and Others v. The United Kingdom, judgment of April 12, 2006, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2006-VI.Google Scholar

Grand Chamber Decision as to the Admissibility of Applications nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01 by Stec and Others v. The United Kingdom.Google Scholar

Tyrer case, judgment of April 25, 1978 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) 26.Google Scholar

Van der Mussele v. Belgium, judgment of November 23, 1983 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)70.Google Scholar

Von Hannover v. Germany, 2004-III Eur. Ct. H.R. 1.Google Scholar

Case of Wemhoff v. Germany judgment of June 27, 1968 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) 7.Google Scholar

X and Y v. The Netherlands, Judgment of March 26, 1985 EUR. Ct. H.R. (ser. A)91.Google Scholar

Judgment on the appeal of the Republic of Kenya against the decision of Pre-trial Chamber II of May 30, 2011 entitled “Decision on the Application by the Government of Kenya Challenging the Admissibility of the Case Pursuant to Article 19(2)(b) of the Statute,” Situation in the Republic of Kenya (Muthaura, Kenyatta, and Ali) (ICC-01/09–02/11 OA), Appeals Chamber, Aug. 30, 2011.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi & Abdullah Al-Senussi, Case No. ICC-01/11-01/11, Pre-trial Chamber I Decision Requesting Further Submissions on Issues Related to the Admissibility of the Case against Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi, 5–19 (Dec. 7, 2012).Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Erdemovic, IT-96-22-T ICTY Trial Chamber I (1996) at par. 19.Google Scholar

Rewe Zentrale AG v. Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein C-120/78, (1979) European court Reports (E.C.R.), 649.Google Scholar

Case C-402/05P and C-415/05P. Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council and Commission [2008] ECR I-6351Google Scholar

Case C-584/10P, C-593/10P, and C 595/10P Commission v. Kadi, judgment of July 18, 2013.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. U.S.), [2004] ICJ Rep. 12.Google Scholar

WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products WT/DS58/AB/R (12 Oct. 1998)Google Scholar

Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).Google Scholar

Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).Google Scholar

Medellin v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008).Google Scholar

United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938).Google Scholar

The State of New South Wales v. Amery and Others, [2006] HCA 14 par. 168–171.Google Scholar

HCJ 5100/94 Public Committee against Torture v. Israel [1999] IsrSC 53(4) 817.Google Scholar