Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T13:48:42.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Abstraction, Pragmatism, and History in Mach’s Economy of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2021

By
Lydia Patton
Edited by
John Preston
John Preston
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access

Summary

Ernst Mach’s appeal to the ‘economy of science’ has sometimes been interpreted as an overarching principle of minimisation, promoting the increasing simplification of scientific knowledge via principles that increase calculating power without adding substantively to the knowledge embedded in empirical facts. There is a growing literature arguing for a more robust understanding of Mach’s ‘economy of science’. Machian ‘economy’ appeals to the continuity between scientific experiences and concepts, but also to the increasing complexity of scientific concepts, building on connections between what Mach called world-elements or sensation-elements. Mach’s account emphasises not only continuities between experiences that allow for simplification, but also areas of divergence that promote the branching of scientific concepts and methods. I emphasise the roles of abstraction, pragmatism, and history in Mach’s economy of science and argue that these elements allowed Mach to investigate the productive tension between creative and conservative moments in the history of science.

Keywords

Ernst MachEconomy of scienceSimplicityScientific conceptsAbstractionPragmatismHistory
Type
Chapter
Information
Interpreting Mach
Critical Essays
 , pp. 142 - 163
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, Erik C. 2003. Ernst Mach’s World Elements: A Study in Natural Philosophy. Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Erik C. 2004. ‘The Philosophical Roots of Mach’s Economy of Thought’, Synthese 139: 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Erik C. 2014. The Realistic Empiricism of Mach, James, and Russell: Neutral Monism Reconceived. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, John T. 1972. Ernst Mach: His Work, Life, and Influence. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breger, Herbert 2000. ‘Tacit Knowledge and Mathematical Progress’, in Grosholz, E. and Breger, H. (eds.), The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge. Kluwer, pp. 221–230.Google Scholar
Cook, Roy T. (ed.) 2007. The Arché Papers on the Mathematics of Abstraction. Springer.Google Scholar
De Kock, Liesbet 2014. ‘Voluntarism in Early Psychology’, History of Psychology 17: 105–128.Google Scholar
De Kock, Liesbet 2015. ‘Hermann von Helmholtz’s Empirico-transcendentalism Reconsidered’, Science in Context 27: 709–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Paz, María 2018. ‘Reconsidering Mach in the Light of the Interplay of Practices’, Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74: 219–246.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J. 1970/2012. Simon Stevin: Science in the Netherlands around 1600. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Philip and Rossberg, Marcus 2016. ‘Introduction’, in Ebert, P. and Rossberg, M. (eds.), Abstractionism. Oxford University Press, pp. 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, Scott 2013. ‘The Limits of Experience and Explanation: F. A. Lange and Ernst Mach on Things in Themselves’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21: 100–121.Google Scholar
Ferreirós, José 2016. Mathematical Knowledge and the Interplay of Practices. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. 1987. Farewell to Reason. Verso.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. 1999. ‘Philosophy of Science: A Subject with a Great Past’, in Feyerabend, P. K., Knowledge, Science and Relativism: Philosophical Papers, Volume 3 (ed. Preston, J. M.). Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–137.Google Scholar
Gori, Pietro 2018. ‘Ernst Mach and Pragmatic Realism’, Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74: 151–172.Google Scholar
Gori, Pietro 2019. ‘What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Science? On Ernst Mach’s Pragmatic Epistemology’, in Stadler, F. (ed.), Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Influence (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook). Springer, pp. 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grattan-Guinness, Ivor 1974. Review of John T. Blackmore, Ernst Mach: His Work, Life, and Influence. British Journal for the History of Science 7: 75–79.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary 1990. The Natural and the Normative. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary 2018. ‘Helmholtz and Philosophy’, Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 6: 12–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmholtz, Hermann von 1867. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, Hermann von 1878. Die Thatsachen in der Wahrnehmung. Hirschwald.Google Scholar
Hui, Alexandra 2013. The Psychophysical Ear: Musical Experiments, Experimental Sounds, 1840–1910. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Felix 1926 Vorlesungen über die Entwicklung der Mathematik im 19. Jahrhundert. Springer.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir I. 1909/1972 Materialism and Empirio-Criticism. Critical Comments on a Reactionary Philosophy, in Lenin. Collected Works, Volume 14. Progress Publishers, pp. 17–362.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1903. ‘Space and Geometry from the Point of View of Physical Inquiry’, The Monist 14: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1905. Erkenntnis und Irrtum. J. A. Barth.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1919. The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development, 2nd English edition, translated from the 1901 3rd German edition by McCormack, Thomas J.. Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1986. Popular Scientific Lectures, trans. McCormack, Thomas J.. Open Court.Google Scholar
Palmieri, Paolo 2008. ‘The Empirical Basis of Equilibrium: Mach, Vailati, and the Lever’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39: 42–53.Google Scholar
Patton, Lydia 2004. Hermann Cohen’s History and Philosophy of Science. Dissertation, McGill University. Available from http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=85027&local_base=GEN01-MCG02Google Scholar
Patton, Lydia 2018. ‘Helmholtz’s Physiological Psychology’, in Lapointe, S. (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in the Nineteenth Century. Routledge, pp. 96–116.Google Scholar
Patton, Lydia 2019. ‘New Water in Old Buckets: Hypothetical and Counterfactual Reasoning in Mach’s Economy of Science’, in Stadler, F. (ed.), Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Influence (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook). Springer, pp. 333–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pojman, Paul 2000. Ernst Mach’s Biological Theory of Knowledge. Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Pojman, Paul 2011. ‘The Influence of Biology and Psychology upon Physics: Ernst Mach Revisited’, Perspectives on Science 19: 121–135.Google Scholar
Schabas, Margaret 2005. The Natural Origins of Economics. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaman, Francis 1975. Review of John T. Blackmore, Ernst Mach: His Work, Life, and Influence. Journal of the History of Philosophy 13: 273–276.Google Scholar
Serra, Isabel and Maia, Elisa 2018. ‘Looking for Routes in Mach’s Epistemology’, Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74: 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staley, Richard 2013. ‘Ernst Mach on Bodies and Buckets’, Physics Today 66: 42–47.Google Scholar
Staley, Richard 2019. ‘Revisiting Einstein’s Happiest Thought’, in Stadler, F. (ed.), Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Influence (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook). Springer, pp. 349–366.Google Scholar
Stein, Howard 1967. ‘Newtonian Space–Time’, Texas Quarterly 10: 174–200.Google Scholar
Stein, Howard 1977. ‘Some Philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity’, in Earman, J., Glymour, C., and Stachel, J. (eds.), Foundations of Space–Time Theories. University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–49.Google Scholar
Stevin, Simon 1586. De beghinselen der weeghconst. Druckerye van Christoffel Plantijn.Google Scholar
Tracz, Brian 2018. ‘Helmholtz on Perceptual Properties’, Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 100: 64–78.Google Scholar
van Dyck, Maarten 2009. ‘On the Epistemological Foundations of the Law of the Lever’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40: 315–318.Google Scholar
Wulz, Monika 2015. ‘Gedankenexperimente im ökonomischen Überschuss. Wissenschaft und Ökonomie bei Ernst Mach’, Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 38: 59–76.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×