Book contents
- Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation
- Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Table
- Preface
- Introduction From Inner Experience to the Self-Formation of Psychological Persons
- Part I The Appearing Self
- Part II Self-Consciousness and the “I” of the Understanding
- Part III The Human Person and the Demands of Reason
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2020
Book contents
- Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation
- Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Table
- Preface
- Introduction From Inner Experience to the Self-Formation of Psychological Persons
- Part I The Appearing Self
- Part II Self-Consciousness and the “I” of the Understanding
- Part III The Human Person and the Demands of Reason
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-FormationThe Nature of Inner Experience, pp. 280 - 297Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Primary Sources
Kant, Immanuel (1999). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1999). Practical Philosophy. Trans. Gregor, Mary J. and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2001). Lectures on Metaphysics. Trans. Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2003). Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770. Trans. Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2004). Lectures on Logic. Trans. Young, Michael J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2004). Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Trans. Friedman, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2010). Notes and Fragments. Trans. Guyer, Paul, Bowman, Curtis, and Rauscher, Frederick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2010). Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Trans. Allison, Henry, Heath, Peter, Hatfield, Gary, and Friedman, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2011). Anthropology, History, and Education. Trans. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2013). Lectures on Anthropology. Trans. Robert B. Louden, Allen W. Wood, Robert R. Clewis, , and G. Felicitas Munzel, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Kant, Immanuel (1999). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1999). Practical Philosophy. Trans. Gregor, Mary J. and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2001). Lectures on Metaphysics. Trans. Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2003). Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770. Trans. Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2004). Lectures on Logic. Trans. Young, Michael J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2004). Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Trans. Friedman, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2010). Notes and Fragments. Trans. Guyer, Paul, Bowman, Curtis, and Rauscher, Frederick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2010). Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Trans. Allison, Henry, Heath, Peter, Hatfield, Gary, and Friedman, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2011). Anthropology, History, and Education. Trans. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2013). Lectures on Anthropology. Trans. Robert B. Louden, Allen W. Wood, Robert R. Clewis, , and G. Felicitas Munzel, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abela, Paul (2006). “The Demands of Systematicity: Rational Judgment and the Structure of Nature”. In Bird, Graham (ed.) A Companion to Kant. Oxford: Blackwell. 408–22.Google Scholar
Allais, Lucy (2009). “Kant, Non-Conceptual Content and the Representation of Space”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47: 383–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, Lucy (2015). Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2000). “Where Have All the Categories Gone? Reflections on Longuenesse’s Reading of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction”. Inquiry 43(1): 81–90.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2015). Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: An Analytical-Historical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (1978). “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument”. Kant-Studien 69: 273–87.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier (2014). The Poverty of Conceptual Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. Anthony (2017). As If: Idealization and Ideals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (c.350 BCE/2016). Aristotle’s “De Anima”. Trans. with commentary Christopher Shields. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Augustine of Hippo, (397–8/2008). Saint Augustine: Confessions. Trans. Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-On, Dorit (2004). Speaking My Mind: Expression and Self-Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander G. (1739/2011). Metaphysica. Ed. and trans. Gawlick, Günter and Kreimendahl, Lothar. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis W. (1978/1986). “Did the Sage of Königsberg Have No Dreams?” In Beck, Lewis W., Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven/London: Yale University Press. 38–60.Google Scholar
Bird, Graham (2000). “The Paralogisms and Kant’s Account of Psychology”. Kant-Studien 91: 129–45.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Richard J. (1961). “Christian Wolff’s Doctrine of the Soul”. Journal of the History of Ideas 22(3): 339–54.Google Scholar
Boyle, Matthew (2009). “Two Kinds of Self-Knowledge”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78(1): 133–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Reinhardt (1999). Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants “Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht”. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhardt (2003). “The Guiding Idea of Kant’s Anthropology and the Vocation of the Human Being”. In Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick (eds.) Essays on Kant’s Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 85–104.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela (2009). Die Analogie von Vernunft und Natur. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela (2014). “Biological Purposiveness and Analogical Reflection”. In Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric (eds.) Kant’s Theory of Biology. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 131–48.Google Scholar
Brook, Andrew (1994). Kant and the Mind. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd (1967). “The Relation between ‘Understanding’ and ‘Reason’”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 67: 209–26.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd (1969). Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: The Classical Origins – Descartes to Kant. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd (1971). “The Conception of Lawlikeness in Kant’s Philosophy of Science”. Synthese 23(1): 24–46.Google Scholar
Callanan, John (2008). “Kant on Analogy”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16(4): 747–72.Google Scholar
Carl, Wolfgang (1989). Der schweigende Kant. Die Entwürfe zu einer Deduktion der Kategorien vor 1781. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Carl, Wolfgang (1992). Die Transzendentale Deduktion der Kategorien in der ersten Auflage der “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”: Ein Kommentar. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Carl, Wolfgang (1997). “Apperception and Spontaneity”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5: 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carl, Wolfgang (1998). “Ich und Spontanität”. In Stamm, Marcelo (ed.) Philosophie in Synthetischer Absicht. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. 105–22.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Peter (2001/2016). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, s.v. Higher-order Theories of Consciousness. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness-higherGoogle Scholar
Cary, Philip (2000). Augustine’s Invention of the Inner Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassam, Quassim (1993). “Inner Sense, Body Sense, and Kant’s ‘Refutation of Idealism’”. European Journal of Philosophy 1: 111–27.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2014). “Modal Motivations for Noumenal Ignorance: Knowledge, Cognition, and Coherence”. Kant-Studien 105(4): 573–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2017). “Can’t Kant Cognize Himself?” In Gomes, Anil and Stephenson, Andrew (eds.) Kant and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 138–57.Google Scholar
Ciami, Mario (1995). “Über eine wenig beachtete Deduktion der regulativen Ideen”. Kant-Studien 86: 308–20.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix (2009). Kant and the Human Sciences: Biology, Anthropology and History. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Collins, Arthur W. (1999). Possible Experience: Understanding Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Berkeley/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cramer, Konrad (1985). Nicht-reine synthetische Urteile a priori. Ein Problem der Transzendentalphilosophie Immanuel Kants. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1641/1996). Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy. Ed. and trans. Cottingham, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Vleeschauwer, Herman J. (1976). La Déduction transcendentale dans l’œuvre de Kant. 3 vols. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
DeWitt, Janelle (2018). “Feeling and Inclination”. In Sorensen, Kelly and Williamson, Diane (eds.) Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 67–87.Google Scholar
Düsing, Klaus (1997). Selbstbewusstseinsmodelle: Moderne Kritiken und systematische Entwürfe zur konkreten Subjektivität. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Düsing, Klaus (2010). “Apperzeption und Selbstaffektion in Kants ‘Kritik der reinen Vernunft’. Das Kernstück der ‘transcendentalen Deduktion’ der Kategorien”. In Fischer, Norbert (ed.) Kants Grundlegung einer kritischen Metaphysik. Einführung in die “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”. Hamburg: Meiner. 139–53.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey (2006). “Empirical Consciousness Explained: Self-Affection, (Self-)Consciousness and Perception in the B Deduction”. Kantian Review 11: 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey (2009). “The Divorce of Reason and Experience: Kant’s Paralogisms of Pure Reason in Context”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47: 249–75.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey (2016). “The Scope of Inner Sense: Development of Kant’s Psychology in the Silent Decade”. Con-textos Kantianos 3: 326–44.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey and Wunderlich, Falk (eds.) (2017). Kant and His Contemporaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emundts, Diana (2007). “Kant über innere Erfahrung”. In Kern, U (ed.) Was ist und was soll sein: Natur und Freiheit bei Immanuel Kant. Berlin: De Gruyter. 191–205.Google Scholar
Emundts, Diana (2010). “The Refutation of Idealism and the Distinction between Phenomena and Noumena”. In Guyer, Paul (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 168–89.Google Scholar
Emundts, Dina (2017). “Kant’s Ideal of Self-Knowledge”. In Renz, Ursula (ed.) Self-Knowledge: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 183–98.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2009). The Form of Practical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Gary (1982). “Self-Identification”. In McDowell, John (ed.) Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 205–66.Google Scholar
Falduto, Antonio (2014). The Faculties of the Human Mind and the Case of Moral Feelings. De Gruyter: Berlin.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, Lorne (1995). Kant’s Intuitionism: A Commentary on the Transcendental Aesthetic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, Alfredo (2015). The Powers of Pure Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1794/1997). Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre als Handschrift für seine Zuhörer. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, David H. (2003). Expression and the Inner. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart (1987). “Is There a Gap in Kant’s Critical System?” Journal of the History of Philosophy 25: 533–55.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred (1991). Selbstbewußtsein und Selbsterkenntnis: Essays zur analytischen Philosophie der Subjektivität. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred (2007). “Non-Objectal Subjectivity”. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(5–6): 152–73.Google Scholar
Freitag, Wolfgang (2018). “Wittgenstein on ‘I Believe’”. Grazer Philosophische Studien 95(1): 54–69.Google Scholar
Freitag, Wolfgang and Kraus, Katharina (2020). “An Expressivist Interpretation of Kant’s ‘I think’”. Noûs. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12350Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2013). Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2009a). “Kant on Mental Disorder 1: An Overview”. History of Psychiatry 20: 267–89.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2009b). “Kant on Mental Disorder 2: Philosophical Implications”. History of Psychiatry 20: 290–310.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2014). Kant’s Empirical Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
García-Carpintero, and Torre, Stephen (eds.) (2016). About Oneself. De Se Thought and Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido (2003). “Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge?” Kant-Studien 94: 273–98.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido (2009). “Is Teleological Judgment (Still) Necessary? Kant’s Arguments in the Analytic and in the Dialectic of Teleological Judgment”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17: 533–66.Google Scholar
Gennaro, Rocco (1999). “Leibniz on Consciousness and Self-Consciousness”. In Gennaro, Rocco and Huenemann, Charles (eds.) New Essays on the Rationalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 353–71.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (2006). “Empirical Concepts and the Content of Experience”. European Journal of Philosophy 14: 349–72.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (2008). “Was Kant a Nonconceptualist?” Philosophical Studies 137: 65–77.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (2017). “Why Must We Presuppose the Systematicity of Nature?” In Massimi, Michela and Breitenbach, Angela (eds.) Kant and the Laws of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 71–88.Google Scholar
Goldman, Avery (2007). “Critique and the Mind: Towards a Defense of Kant’s Transcendental Method”. Kant-Studien 98(4): 403–17.Google Scholar
Goldman, Avery (2012). Kant and the Subject of Critique: On the Regulative Role of the Psychological Idea. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Golob, Sacha (2014). “Kant on Intentionality, Magnitude, and the Unity of Perception”. European Journal of Philosophy 22(4): 505–28.Google Scholar
Gouaux, Charles (1972). “Kant’s View on the Nature of Empirical Psychology”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 8: 237–42.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle (1993). “Illusion and Fallacy in Kant’s First Paralogism”. Kant-Studien 83: 257–82.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle (1997). “Kant on the Illusion of a Systematic Unity of Knowledge”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 14: 1–28.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle (2001). Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grüne, Stefanie (2009). Blinde Anschauung: Die Rolle von Begriffen in Kants Theorie sinnlicher Synthesis. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Grüne, Stefanie (2017). “Givenness, Objective Reality, and A Priori Intuitions”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(1): 113–30.Google Scholar
Grünewald, Bernward (2009). Geist – Kultur – Gesellschaft: Versuch einer Prinzipientheorie der Geisteswissenschaften auf transzendentalphilosophischer Grundlage. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1979). Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1987). Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1990). “Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity”. Noûs 24: 17–43.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2003). “Kant on the Systematicity of Nature: Two Puzzles”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 20(3): 277–95.Google Scholar
Haag, Johannes (2007). Erfahrung und Gegenstand: Das Verhältnis von Sinnlichkeit und Verstand. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1991). “Vom pragmatischen, ethischen und moralischen Gebrauch der praktischen Vernunft”. In Habermas, Jürgen, Diskursethik – Philosophische Texte Band 3. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hanna, Robert (2001). Kant and the Foundations of Analytical Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, Robert (2005). “Kant and Nonconceptual Content”. European Journal of Philosophy 13: 247–90.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (2006). “Empirical, Rational, and Transcendental Psychology: Psychology as Science and as Philosophy”. In Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 200–27.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1929/1990). Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann. (English translation: Richard Taft (trans.) (1990) Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidemann, Dietmar H. (1998). Kant und das Problem des metaphysischen Idealismus. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heidemann, Dietmar H. (2001). “Innerer und äußerer Sinn. Kants Konstitutionstheorie empirischen Selbstbewusstseins”. In Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Schumacher, Ralph (eds.) Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung. Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 2. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 305–13.Google Scholar
Helfer, Martha (1996). The Retreat of Representation: The Concept of Darstellung in German Critical Discourse. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Heller-Roazen, Daniel (2007). The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Henning, Tim (2010). “Kant und die Logik des ‘Ich denke’”. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 64(3): 331–56.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1969). “The Proof-Structure of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction”. Review of Metaphysics 22(4): 640–59.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1976). Identität und Objektivität: Eine Untersuchung über Kants transzendentale Deduktion. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1994). The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heßbrüggen-Walter, Stefan (2004). Die Seele und ihre Vermögen: Kant’s Metaphysik des Mentalen in der “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”. Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
Hölder, Alfred (1873). Darstellung der Kantischen Erkenntnistheorie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der verschiedenen Fassungen der transscendentalen Deduction der Kategorien. Tübingen: Laupp.Google Scholar
Hoppe, Hansgeorg (1983). Synthesis bei Kant: Das Problem der Verbindung von Vorstellungen und ihrer Gegenstandsbeziehung in der “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Horstmann, Rolf-Peter (1989). “Why Must There Be a Transcendental Deduction in Kant’s Critique of Judgment?”. In Förster, Eckart (ed.) Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three “Critiques” and the “Opus Postumum”. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 157–79.Google Scholar
Horstmann, Rolf-Peter (2018). Kant’s Power of Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, Robert (2001). “Kant, the ‘I Think’, and Self-Awareness”. In Cicovacki, Predrag (ed.) Kant’s Legacy: Essays in Honor of Lewis White Beck. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press. 117–52.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1740/1978). A Treatise on Human Nature. Eds. Selby-Bigge, Lewis A. and Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund (1900/1975). Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. In Holenstein, Elmar (ed.) Husserliana XVIII. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund (1928). Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewußtseins. Ed. Heidegger, Martin. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund (1931/1988). Cartesian Meditations. Trans. Dorion Cairns. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Indregard, Jonas Jervell (2017). “Self-Affection and Pure Intuition in Kant”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95(4): 627–43.Google Scholar
Indregard, Jonas Jervell (2018). “Consciousness as Inner Sensation: Crusius and Kant”. Ergo 5(7): 173–201.Google Scholar
Jacob, Pierre (2019). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, s.v. Intentionality. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intentionalityGoogle Scholar
Jankowiak, Tim (2014). “Sensations as Representations in Kant”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22(3): 492–513.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Larry M. (2011). “Leibniz on Memory and Consciousness”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19(5): 887–916.Google Scholar
Kannisto, Toni (2016). “Positio contra complementum possibilitatis – Kant and Baumgarten on Existence”. Kant-Studien 107(2): 291–313.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David (1989). “Demonstratives”. In Almog, Joseph, Perry, John and Wettstein, Howard (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. 481–563.Google Scholar
Keller, Pierre (1995). “Personal Identity and Kant’s Third Person Perspective”. Idealistic Studies 24(2): 123–46.Google Scholar
Keller, Pierre (1998). Kant and the Demands of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman (1930). A Commentary to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patrica (1984). “Kant’s Real Self”. In Wood, Allen (ed.) Kant on Self and Nature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 113–47.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia (1990). Kant’s Transcendental Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia (1999). “Kant on Self-consciousness”. Philosophical Review 108(3): 345–86.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1986). “Projecting the Order of Nature”. In Butts, Robert (ed.) Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science. Dordrecht: Reidel. 201–35.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2008). The Constitution of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2009). Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, Katharina (2016). “Quantifying Inner Experience? – Kant’s Mathematical Principles in the Context of Empirical Psychology”. European Journal of Philosophy 24(2): 331–57.Google Scholar
Kraus, Katharina (2018). “The Soul as the ‘Guiding Idea’ of Psychology: Kant on Scientific Psychology, Systematicity, and the Idea of the Soul”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 71: 77–88.Google Scholar
Kraus, Katharina (2019a). “The Parity and Disparity between Inner and Outer Experience in Kant”. Kantian Review 24(2): 171–95.Google Scholar
Kraus, Katharina (2019b). “Rethinking the Relationship between Empirical Psychology and Transcendental Philosophy in Kant”. International Yearbook of German Idealism 15: 47–76.Google Scholar
Kraus, Katharina (forthcoming). “Kant’s Argument against Psychological Materialism in the Prolegomena”. In Thielke, Peter (ed.) Kant’s “Prolegomena”: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, Katharina and Sturm, Thomas (2017). “‘An Attractive Alternative to Empirical Psychologies Both in His Day and Our Own’? A Critique of Frierson’s Kant’s Empirical Psychology”. Studi Kantiani 30: 203–23.Google Scholar
Kriegel, Uriah (2009). Subjective Consciousness: A Self-Representational Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulstad, Mark A. (1991). Leibniz on Apperception, Consciousness and Reflection. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
Land, Thomas (2014). “Spatial Representation, Magnitude, and the Two Stems of Cognition”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44(5–6): 524–50.Google Scholar
Land, Thomas (2015a). “No Other Use Than in Judgment? Kant on Concepts and Sensible Synthesis”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 53(3): 461–84.Google Scholar
Land, Thomas (2015b). “Non-Conceptual Readings of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction”. Kantian Review 20(1): 25–51.Google Scholar
Leary, David E. (1978). “The Philosophical Development of the Conception of Psychology in Germany, 1780–1850”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 14: 113–21.Google Scholar
Lee, Seung-Kee (2012). “Logical Forms, Indeterminacy, and the Subjective Unity of Consciousness in Kant”. In Giordanetti, Piero, Pozzo, Riccardo and Sgarbi, Marco (eds.) Kant’s Philosophy of the Unconscious. Berlin: De Gruyter. 233–70.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1686/1989). “Discourse on Metaphysics.” In Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Philosophical Essays. Eds. and trans. Garber, Daniel and Ariew, Roger. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. 35–68.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1714a/1989). “The Principles of Philosophy, or, the Monadology”. In Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Philosophical Essays. Eds. and trans. Garber, Daniel and Ariew, Roger. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. 213–25.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1714b/1989). “Principles of Nature and Grace”. In Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Philosophical Essays. Eds. and trans. Garber, Daniel and Ariew, Roger. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. 206–13.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1765/1996). New Essays on Human Understanding. Eds. and trans. Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1690/1975). An Essay on the Human Understanding. Ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (1998). Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (2005). Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (2007). “Kant’s ‘I think’ versus Descartes’ ‘I am a Thing that Thinks’”. In Longuenesse, Béatrice and Garber, Daniel (eds.) Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 9–31.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (2012). “Two Uses of ‘I’ as Subject”. In Prosser, Simon and Récanati, François (eds.) Immunity to Error through Misidentification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 81–103.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf (1990). Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf (2001). “Kant on the Scientific Status of Psychology, Anthropology, and History”. In Watkins, Eric (ed.) Kant and the Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press. 185–204.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf (2003). “The Cognition–Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34: 149–64.Google Scholar
Maly, Sebastian (2011). Kant über die symbolische Erkenntnis Gottes. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mariña, Jacqueline (2011). “Transcendental Arguments for Personal Identity in Kant’s Transcendental Deduction”. Philo 14(2): 109–36.Google Scholar
Marshall, Colin (2010). “Kant’s Metaphysics of the Self”. Philosophers’ Imprint 10(8): 1–21.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter (2014). “Transcendental Presuppositions and Ideas of Reason”. Kant-Studien 105(4): 554–72.Google Scholar
McLear, Colin (2011). “Kant on Animal Consciousness”. Philosophers’ Imprint 11(15): 1–16.Google Scholar
McLear, Colin (2014). “The Kantian (Non)-Conceptualism Debate”. Philosophy Compass 9(11): 769–90.Google Scholar
McLear, Colin (2015). “Two Kinds of Unity in the Critique of Pure Reason”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 53(1): 79–110.Google Scholar
McNulty, M. Bennett (2015). “Rehabilitating the Regulative Use of Reason: Kant on Empirical and Chemical Laws”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 54: 1–10.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2018). Kant on Reflection and Moral Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa and Valaris, Marco (2017). “Attention and Synthesis in Kant’s Conception of Experience”. Philosophical Quarterly 67(268): 571–92.Google Scholar
Michel, Karin (2003). Untersuchungen zur Zeitkonzeption in Kants “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mischel, Theodore (1967). “Kant and the Possibility of a Science of Psychology”. Monist 51: 599–622.Google Scholar
Mohr, Georg (1991). Das sinnliche Ich. Innerer Sinn und Bewußtsein bei Kant. Würzburg: Könighausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Mudd, Sasha (2017). “The Demand for Systematicity and the Authority of Theoretical Reason in Kant”. Kantian Review 22(1):81–106.Google Scholar
Munzel, Felicitas (1999). Kant’s Conception of Moral Character: The “Critical” Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Nassar, Dalia (2016). “Analogical Reflection as a Source for the Science of Life: Kant and the Possibility of the Biological Sciences”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 58: 57–66.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul (1912). Allgemeine Psychologie nach kritischer Methode. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck).Google Scholar
Nayak, Abhaya C. and Sotnak, Eric (1995). “Kant on the Impossibility of the ‘Soft Sciences’”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55: 133–51.Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan (1994). The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1989). Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paton, Herbert J. (1936). Kant’s Metaphysics of Experience. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Pendlebury, Michael (1995). “Making Sense of Kant’s Schematism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55(4): 777–97.Google Scholar
Peters, Julia (2018). “Kant’s Gesinnung”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 56(3): 497–518.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert (1976). “The Schematism and Empirical Concepts”. Kant-Studien 67: 156–71.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert (1982). Kant’s Theory of Form. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2001). Kants “Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft”: Ein kritischer Kommentar. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2017). Kant’s Theory of Normativity: Exploring the Space of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Thomas (1990). Kant’s Theory of Self-Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reininger, Robert (1900). Kants Lehre vom inneren Sinn und seine Theorie der Erfahrung. Wien/Leipzig: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Rosefeldt, Tobias (2003). “Kant’s Self: Real Entity and Logical Identity”. In Glock, Hans-Johann (ed.) Strawson and Kant. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 141–54.Google Scholar
Rosefeldt, Tobias (2017). “Subjects of Kant’s First Paralogism”. In Gomes, Anil and Stephenson, Andrew (eds.) Kant and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 221–44.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Jay (2005). Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the “Critique of Pure Reason”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul (1943/1948). Being and Nothingness. Trans Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Schechtman, Marya (2014). Staying Alive: Personal Identity, Practical Concerns, and the Unity of a Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Claudia (2008). “Kant’s Transcendental and Empirical Psychology of Cognition”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39(4): 462–72.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Friederike (2015). “On Kant’s Conception of Inner Sense: Self-Affection by the Understanding”. European Journal of Philosophy 23(4): 1044–63.Google Scholar
Schönrich, Gerhard (1991). “Kant und die vermeintliche Unmöglichkeit einer wissenschaftlichen Psychologie”. Psychologie und Geschichte 2: 130–7.Google Scholar
Schulting, Dennis (2012). Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid (1968). Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid (1978). “The Role of Imagination in Kant’s Theory of Experience”. In Johnstone, Henry (ed.) Categories: A Colloquium. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. 231–45.Google Scholar
Serck-Hanssen, Camilla (2009). “Kant on Consciousness”. In Heinämaa, Sara (ed.) Psychology and Philosophy. Berlin: Springer. 139–57.Google Scholar
Serck-Hanssen, Camilla (2011). “Der Nutzen von Illusionen: Ist die Idee der Seele unentbehrlich?”. In Dörflinger, Bernd and Kruck, Günter (eds.) Über den Nutzen von Illusionen: Die regulativen Ideen in Kants theoretischer Philosophie. Hildesheim: Olms. 59–70.Google Scholar
Shabel, Lisa (1998). “Kant on the ‘Symbolic Construction’ of Mathematical Concepts”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29(4): 589–621.Google Scholar
Shabel, Lisa (2007). “Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics”. In Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 94–128.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Sidney (1968). “Self-Reference and Self-Awareness”. Journal of Philosophy 65: 555–67.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Sidney (1994). “Self-Knowledge and ‘Inner Sense’”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 249–314.Google Scholar
Simmons, Allison (2011). “Leibnizian Consciousness Reconsidered”. Studia Leibnitiana 43(2): 196–215.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Kelly and Williamson, Diane (eds.) (2018). Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Andrew (2015). “Kant on the Object-Dependence of Intuition and Hallucination”. Philosophical Quarterly 65(260): 486–508.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Andrew (2017). “Imagination and Inner Intuition”. In Gomes, Anil and Stephenson, Andrew (eds.) Kant and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 104–23.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen (2011). Locke on Personal Identity: Consciousness and Concernment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter (1959). Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sturm, Thomas (2001). “Kant on Empirical Psychology: How Not to Investigate the Human Mind”. In Watkins, Eric (ed.) Kant and the Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press. 163–84.Google Scholar
Sturma, Dieter (1985). Kant über Selbstbewußtsein: Zum Zusammenhang von Erkenntniskritik und Theorie des Selbstbewußtseins. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Tetens, Johann Nicolaus (1777). Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwickelung. Leipzig: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (1994). “Hume’s Notion of Consciousness and Reflection in Context”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2: 75–105.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (1996). “Between Wolff and Kant: Merian’s Theory of Apperception”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 34: 213–32.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (1997). “Varieties of Inner Sense. Two Pre-Kantian Theories”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 79(1): 58–79.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (2001). “Kant’s Notion of Self-Consciousness in Context”. In Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Schumacher, Ralph (eds.) Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung. Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 2. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 468–76.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (2011). The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (2017). “Kant and Tetens on the Unity of the Self”. In Dyck, Corey and Wunderlich, Falk (eds.) Kant and His Contemporaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 59–75.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (2018). “Feder und der Innere Sinn”. In Nowitzky, Hans Peter, Roth, Udo and Stiening, Gideon (eds.) Johann Georg Heinrich Feder (1740–1821): Empirismus und Popularphilosophie zwischen Wolff und Kant. Berlin: De Gruyter. 55–86.Google Scholar
Thöle, Bernhard (1991). Kant und das Problem der Gesetzmäßigkeit der Natur. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton (2013). “The Non-Conceptuality of the Content of Intuitions: A New Approach”. Kantian Review 18(1): 107–36.Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton (2016). “The Difference between Original, Metaphysical, and Geometrical Representations of Space”. In Schulting, Dennis (ed.) Kantian Nonconceptualism. London: Palgrave. 257–85.Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton (2017). “Kant on the Place of Cognition in the Progression of Our Representations”. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1623-5Google Scholar
Tugendhat, Ernst (1979). Selbstbewußtsein und Selbstbestimmung: Sprachanalytische Interpretationen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans (1911). Die Philosophie des Als Ob: System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus. Mit einem Anhang über Kant und Nietzsche. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.Google Scholar
Valaris, Markos (2008). “Inner Sense, Self-Affection and Temporal Consciousness in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason”. Philosophers’ Imprint 8(4): 1–18.Google Scholar
Vogel, Jonathan (1993). “The Problem of Self-Knowledge in Kant’s ‘Refutation of Idealism’: Two Recent Views”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53: 875–87.Google Scholar
Warren, Daniel (2001). Reality and Impenetrability in Kant’s Philosophy of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Washburn, Michael C. (1976). “Did Kant Have a Theory of Self-Knowledge?” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 58: 40–56.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2005). Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2009). Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2013). “Kant on Infima Species”. In Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio and Ruffing, Margit (eds.) Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin: De Gruyter. 283–96.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2016). “Kant on Materialism”. British Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (5): 1035–52.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2019). “Kant on Real Conditions”. In Waibel, Violette L. and Ruffing, Margit (eds.) Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin: De Gruyter. 1133–40.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric and Willaschek, Marcus (2017a). “Kant’s Account of Cognition”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(1): 83–112.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, and Willaschek, Marcus (2017b). “Kant on Cognition and Knowledge”. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1624-4Google Scholar
Waxman, Wayne (1991). Kant’s Model of the Mind: A New Interpretation of Transcendental Idealism. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Shelley (2008). “The Coherence of Consciousness in Locke’s ‘Essay’”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 25(1): 21–39.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (1992). Praktische Vernunft: Handlungstheorie und Moralbegründung bei Kant. Stuttgart/Weimar: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (2009). “Der eigenen Wille”. In Heilinger, Jan-Christoph, King, Colin G. and Wittwer, Héctor (eds.) Individualität und Selbstbestimmung. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. 191–212.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (2010). “The Primacy of Pure Practical Reason and the Very Idea of a Postulate”. In Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens (eds.) Kant’s “Critique of Practical Reason”: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 168–96.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (2018). Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1720/1997). Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. In Gesammelte Werke I 2. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1732/1968). Psychologia empirica. In Gesammelte Werke II 5. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1734/1994). Psychologia rationalis. In Gesammelte Werke II 6. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael (2006). “Empirischer und transzendentaler Dualismus. Zu Rolf-Peter Horstmanns Interpretation von Kants Paralogismen”. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 54: 265–75.Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul (1973). Kant’s Theory of Mental Activity. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2018). “Feeling and Desire in the Human Animal”. In Sorensen, Kelly and Williamson, Diane (eds.) Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 88–106.Google Scholar
Wuerth, Julian (2010). “The Paralogisms of Pure Reason”. In Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 210–44.Google Scholar
Wuerth, Julian (2014). Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Falk (2005). Kant und die Bewußtseinstheorien des 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm (1888). “Selbstbeobachtung und innere Wahrnehmung”. Philosophische Studien 4: 292–309.Google Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm (1902). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Young, J. Michael. 1982. “Kant and the Construction of Arithmetical Concepts.” Kant-Studien 73: 17–46.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan (2005). Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2017). “Empirical Scientific Investigation and the Ideas of Reason”. In Massimi, Michela and Breitenbach, Angela (eds.) Kant and the Laws of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 89–107.Google Scholar