Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T06:10:35.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Special Needs Populations

from PART I - CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND STRATEGIC OVERVIEW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

By
Brenda D. Phillips
Edited by
Kristi L. Koenig  and
Carl H. Schultz
Kristi L. Koenig
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Carl H. Schultz
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

OVERVIEW

In studying the impact of disasters, concern has developed regarding populations that demonstrate a greater vulnerability to injury, death, and/or property loss. The term “special needs,” as well as vulnerable populations or populations at risk, has been applied to this group. These terms broadly cover a range of people who might need particular kinds of assistance in emergencies and disasters. Vulnerable populations include people with disabilities, senior citizens, pregnant women, infants and children, single parents, women, low-income families, and racial and ethnic minorities. Examples of unique interventions for such individuals are specially crafted warnings (in various languages and literacy levels), evacuation and transportation assistance, priority rescue, medical treatment, accessible sheltering, and assistance with rebuilding.

A broad-brush approach to vulnerability has certain benefits. First, a wider inclusion means that a given jurisdiction, organization, or community may contextualize the term. In some locations, it may be that the most vulnerable population includes senior citizens. In another location, it could be recent immigrants. Second, a broad approach captures a more complete list of those potentially at risk. Doing so allows emergency managers to understand the complexities of people's lives and circumstances. Sex, for example, can greatly increase risk in some contexts. Pregnancy may further complicate the ability to escape danger or can, itself, endanger both mother and fetus. Low-income households may lack the resources to afford protective action. If such households include seniors on fixed incomes, additional complications arise including transportation assistance and nutritional and medical support.

Keywords

disastersemergency managementmitigationrecoveryresponsepopulations at riskpreparednesssocial vulnerabilityvulnerable populations
Type
Chapter
Information
Koenig and Schultz's Disaster Medicine
Comprehensive Principles and Practices
 , pp. 113 - 130
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,National Organization on Disability. Special Needs Assessment for Katrina Evacuees. Washington, DC: National Organization on Disability; 2005.
American Medical Association. Nearly 1,000 People Killed by Hurricane Katrina in Louisiana. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/print/20035.html. Accessed January 10, 2009.
Sharkey, P. Survival and death in New Orleans: an empirical look at the human impact of Katrina. J Black Studies. 2007;37(4):482–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laska, S. What if Hurricane Ivan had not missed New Orleans? Natural Hazards Observer. 2004;1.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L. Guidelines for emergency managers working with culturally and linguistically diverse communities. Aust J Emerg Manage. 2003;18(1):13–18.Google Scholar
Enarson, E. Social Vulnerability Course. http://www.fema.gov. Accessed September 30, 2008.
Wisner, B. Development of Vulnerability Analysis. http://www.fema.gov. Accessed September 30, 2008.
Friedsam, H. Older persons as disaster casualties. J Health Hum Behav. 1970;1(4):269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, F, Friedman, M, Watson, P. 60,000 disaster victims speak: part II . Psychiatry. 2002;65(3):240–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, F, Friedman, M, Watson, P, Byrne, C, Diaz, E, Kaniasty, K. 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part I . Psychiatry. 2002;65(3):207–239.Google Scholar
Lindell, MK, Perry, RW. Communicating Risk in Multiethnic Communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.
Prince-Embury, S, Rooney, JF. Psychological symptoms of residents in the aftermath of the Three Mile Island accident and restart. J Soc Psychol. 1988;128(6):779–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulshock, S, Cohen, E. The elderly in the aftermath of disaster. Gerontologist. 1975;15(4):357–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Baylor College of Medicine, American Medical Association. Recommendations for Best Practices in the Management of Elderly Disaster Victims. Baylor College of Medicine; 2006.
Phillips, B, Hewett, P. Home alone: disasters, mass emergencies and children in self-care. J Emerg Manage. 2005;3(2):31–35.Google Scholar
Peek, L, Fothergill, A. Reconstructing Childhood: An Exploratory Study of Children in Hurricane Katrina. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Center; 2006.
Fothergill, A, Peek, L. Surviving catastrophe: a study of children in hurricane Katrina. In: Center, NH, ed. Learning from Catastrophe. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Center; 2006:97–129.
Pfefferbaum, B, Call, J, Sconzo, G. Mental health services for children in the first two years after the 1995 Oklahoma City terrorist bombing. Psychiatry Serv. 1999;50(7):956–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbrother, G, Stuber, J, Galea, S, Pfefferbaum, B, Fleischman, A. Unmet need for counseling services by children in New York City after the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center: implications for pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2004;113(5):1367–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delica, ZG. Balancing vulnerability and capacity: women and children in the Philippines. In: Enarson, E, Morrow, BH, eds. The Gendered Terrain of Disaster. Miami, FL: International Hurricane Center; 2000:109–113.
Landrigan, P. Health and environmental consequences of the World Trade Center disaster. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(6):731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center, Heinz. Human Links to Coastal Disasters. Washington, DC: The Heinz Center; 2002.
Comerio, M. The Impact of Housing Losses in the Northridge Earthquake: Recovery and Reconstruction Issues. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California-Berkeley; 1996.
Fothergill, A, Maestas, EGM, Darlington, JD. Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: a review of the literature. Disasters. 1999;23(2):156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legates, DR, Biddle, MD. Warning Response and Risk Behavior in the Oak Grove-Birmingham, Alabama Tornado of 8 April 1998. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Center; 1999.
Aguirre, BE, Anderson, WA, Balandran, S, Peters, BE, White, HM. Saragosa, Texas, Tornado May 22, 1987: An Evaluation of the Warning System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1991.
Phillips, B. Cultural diversity in disaster situations. Intl J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1993;11:99–110.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. The geography of social vulnerability: race, class and catastrophe. Available at: http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Cutter/printable.html. Accessed January 11, 2009.
,Oxfam. The Tsunami's Impact on Women. London: Oxfam International; 2001.
Noel, G. The role of women in health-related aspects of emergency management: a Caribbean perspective. In: Enarson, E, Morrow, BH, eds. The Gendered Terrain of Disaster. Miami: International Hurricane Center; 2000:213–219.
Enarson, E, Morrow, BH. Why gender? Why women? An introduction to women and disaster. In: Enarson, E, Morrow, B, eds. The Gendered Terrain of Disaster. Miami: International Hurricane Center; 2000:1–9.
Enarson, E, Phillips, B. Invitation to a new feminist disaster sociology. In: Phillips, B, Morrow, B, eds. Women and Disasters: From Theory to Practice. Philadelphia: Xlibris, International Research Committee on Disasters; 2008:41–74.
Phillips, B, Morrow, BH. What's gender got to do with it? In: Phillips, B, Morrow, B, eds. Women and Disasters: From Theory to Practice. Philadelphia: Xlibris, International Research Committee on Disasters; 2008:27–40.
Enarson, E. What women do: gendered labor in the Red River Valley flood. Environ Hazards. 2001;3:1–18.Google Scholar
Webb, G, Tierney, K, Dahlhamer, J. Businesses and disasters. Natural Hazards Rev. 2000;1(3):83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enarson, E, Morrow, B. A gendered perspective: the voices of women. In: Peacock, W, Morrow, B, Gladwin, H, eds. Hurricane Andrew. Miami: International Hurricane Center; 2000:116–140.
Toscani, L. Women's roles in natural disaster preparation and aid: a Central American view. In: Enarson, E, Morrow, BH, eds. The Gendered Terrain of Disaster. Miami: International Hurricane Center; 2000:207–211.
Christiansen, K, Blair, M, Holt, J. The built environment, evacuation and individuals with disabilities. Rev Disabil Policy Stud. 2007;17(4):249–254.Google Scholar
Tierney, KJ, Petak, WJ, Hahn, H. Disabled Persons and Earthquake Hazards. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science; 1988.
,National Organization on Disability. Harris Survey Data. Available at: http://nod.citysoft.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.viewPage&PageID=1565&C:\CFusion8\verity\Data\dummy.txt. Accessed January 11, 2009.
Phillips, B, Morrow, B. Social vulnerability, forecasts and warnings. Natural Hazards Rev. 2007;8(3):61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, V, Weisman, R. A hole in the weather warning system. Am Meteorol Soc. 2003;84(2):187–194.Google Scholar
Hendricks, T. Bay Area report: 112 languages spoken in diverse region. San Francisco Chronicle, March 14, 2005.
,Government Accountability Office. Transportation-Disadvantaged Populations. Washington, DC: GAO; 2003.
Eldar, R. The needs of elderly persons in natural disasters. Disasters. 2007;16(4):355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, L, Byard, D, Lin, C-C, Benson, S, Barbera, J. Frail elderly as disaster victims. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17(2):76–74.Google Scholar
Peek, L. Becoming Muslim. Sociol Religion. 2005;66(3):215–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, KJ, Lindell, MK, Perry, RW. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the U.S. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press; 2001.
Willigen, MV. Riding out the storm. Natural Hazards Rev. 2002;3(3):98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enarson, E. Violence against women in disasters. Violence Against Women. 1999;5(7):742–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,California State Independent Living Council. The Impact of Southern California Wildfires on People with Disabilities. Sacramento, CA: California State Independent Living Council; 2004.
Metz, W, Hewett, P, Muzzarelli, J, Tanzman, E. Identifying Special Needs Households that Need Assistance for Emergency Planning. Intl J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2002;20(2):255–281.Google Scholar
Jenkins, P, Phillips, BD. Battered women, catastrophe and the context of safety. NWSA J. 2008;20(3):49–68.Google Scholar
,Florida Department of Health. Resource Guide for Special Needs Shelters. Tallahassee, FL; 2006.
Mileti, D. Disasters by Design. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press; 1999.
Nakagawa, Y, Shaw, R. Social capital: a missing link to disaster recovery. Intl J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2004;22(1):5–34.Google Scholar
Uphoff, N. Understanding Social Capital. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2000.
,Natural Hazards Center. Holistic Disaster Recovery. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Center; 2001.
Steuteville, R. Hugo sets an example. BioCycle. 1992;33:1030–1033.Google Scholar
,Centers for Disease Control. Self-reported increase in asthma severity after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. MMWR. 2002;51:781–784.Google Scholar
Lin, S. Respiratory symptoms and other health effects among residents living near the World Trade Center. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(16):499–507.Google Scholar
Szema, A. Clinical deterioration in pediatric asthmatic patients after September 11, 2001. J Allerg Clin Immunol. 2004;113:420–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malievskaya, E. Assessing the health of immigrant workers near ground zero. Am J Indust Med. 2002;42(6):548–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, K. Everything in its Path. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1976.
Mitigation, Godschalk DR.. In: Waugh, W, Tierney, K, eds. Emergency Management: Practice and Principles for Local Government. 2nd ed. Washington DC: ICMA Press; 2007:89–112.
Cuny, F. Disasters and Development. Dallas, TX: Intertech; 1983.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×