Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:26:29.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2023

Dries Van Nieuwenhuyse ,
Ronald van Harxen  and
David H. Johnson
Illustrated by
Joris De Raedt
Dries Van Nieuwenhuyse
Affiliation:
EHSAL Management School, Brussels, Belgium
Ronald van Harxen
Affiliation:
Dutch Little Owl Working Group (STONE)
David H. Johnson
Affiliation:
Global Owl Project, USA
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Little Owl
Population Dynamics, Behavior and Management of <I>Athene noctua</I>
 , pp. 563 - 607
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadi, F., Gimenez, O., Ullrich, B., Arlettaz, R. and Schaub, M. 2010. Estimation of immigration rate using integrated population models. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdusalyamov, I.A. 1971. Little Owl (A. n. bactriana Hutton) Fauna Tadzhikskoi SSR (Fauna of Tajik SSR). Vol. XIX. Part 1. Ptitsy (Birds). Dushanbe: Donish, 332–336.Google Scholar
Abu Baker, M.A. and Yamaguchi, N. 2017. On the diet of Little Owl Athene noctua from Al Reem biosphere reserve in Qatar, with the first record of Pygmy Gerbil Gerbillus henleyi for Qatar. Sandgrouse 39: 53–60.Google Scholar
Adam, G. 1973. Steinkauz (Athene noctua) jagt zu Fuss nach Heuschrecken Ornithologische Mitteilungen 25: 249.Google Scholar
Afanasova, L.V. and Khokhlov, A.N. 1995. Pitanie domovogo sycha v period razmnojeniya na zapade Stavropol’skogo kraya [The Little Owl feeding during breeding period in the west of Stavropol Territory]. Trudy Teberdinskogo gosudarstvennogo zapovednika [Proceedings of Teberda State Nature Reserve] 14: 187–190.Google Scholar
Aldrovandus, U. 1646. Ornithologiae hoc est de avibvs historiae Libri XII. Apud Nicolaum Tebeldinum.Google Scholar
Allanazarova, N.A. 1988. Nekotorye dannye po pitaniyudomovogo sycha v yugo-zapadnom Uzbekistane [Some data on the Little Owl feeding in Uzbekistan]. Ekologiya, okhrana i ratsional’noeispolízovanie ptits Uzbekistana [Ecology, Conservation and Wise Management of Birds of Uzbekistan]. Materialy II Respublikanskoi ornitologicheskoi konferentsii [Materials of the 2nd Republican Ornithogy Conference], Tashkent, 23–25 November 1988. Tashkent: Fan Press, 6–7 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Alonso, R., Orejas, P., Lopes, F. and Sanz, C. 2011. Pre-release training of juvenile little owls Athene noctua to avoid predation. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 34: 389–393.Google Scholar
Altringham, J.D., O’Brien, S. and Julian, S. 1994. Feeding ecology of Little Owls (Athene noctua) at an upland site in Northern England. Naturalist 119: 81–94.Google Scholar
Ametov, M. 1981. Birds of Karakalpakia and their Protection. Nukus: Karakalpakstan Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Ammersbach, R. 1952. Zur “Kiewitt”-Frage (Steinkauz oder Waldkauz). Ornithologische Mitteilungen 4: 184.Google Scholar
Ancelet, C. 2003. Des Chouettes chevêches Athene noctua casanières, confiantes ou terrorisées? Héron 36: 167.Google Scholar
Andersen, L.H., Sunde, P., Loeschcke, V. and Pertoldi, C. 2015. A population viability analysis on the declining population of Little Owl (Athene noctua) in Denmark using the stochastic simulation program VORTEX. Ornis Fennica 92: 123–143.Google Scholar
Andersen, L.H., Sunde, P., Pellegrino, I., Loeschcke, V. and Pertoldi, C. 2017. Using population viability analysis, genomics, and habitat suitability to forecast future population patterns of Little Owl Athene noctua across Europe. Ecology and Evolution 7: 10987–11001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Franklin, A.B., et al. 1999. A protocol for conflict resolution in analyzing empirical data related to natural resource controversies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 1050.Google Scholar
Anderson, S.I. 1949. Little Owl raiding starlings’ nest. New Zealand Bird Notes 3: 110–110.Google Scholar
Andreotti, A. 1989. Atlante degli uccelli nidificante in Liguria Regione Liguria. Asserorato All’urbanistica Asserorato All’agricultura e Foreste. Catalogli dei beni naturali. Genova: Regione Liguria, 71.Google Scholar
Andrews, I. 1995. The Birds of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Mussleburgh: I.J. Andrews.Google Scholar
Andrews, P. 1990. Owls, Caves, and Fossils. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Angyal, L. and Konopka, H.-L. 1975. Beobachtungen an einem zahmen Steinkauz. Gefiederte Welt 99: 212–216.Google Scholar
Apolloni, N., Grüebler, M.U., Arlettaz, R., Gottschalk, T.K. and Naef-Daenzer, B. 2018. Habitat selection and range use of little owls in relation to habitat patterns at three spatial scales. Animal Conservation 21: 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J.M., Hatch, J.J. and Nisbet, I.C. 2006. Effects of egg size, parental quality and hatch-date on growth and survival of Common Tern Sterna hirundo chicks. Ibis 148: 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ataev, K. 1977. Novye dannye po ekologii domovogo sycha [New data on the Little Owl ecology]. VII Vsesoyuznaya ornitologicheskaya konferentsiya [VIIth All-Union Orn. Conference]. Kishinev: Naukova Dumka Press, 196–197.Google Scholar
Audenaert, T. 2003. Voorkomen en verspreiding van de Steenuil Athene noctua te Sint-Pauwels tijdens het broedseizoen. Groene Waasland 132: 10–13.Google Scholar
Augst, U. and Manka, G. 1997. Vorkommen, Verbreitung und Bestandsentwicklung von Steinkauz (Athene noctua), Sperlingskauz (Glaucidium passerinum) und Rauhfusskauz (Aegolius funereus) in der Sächsischen Schweiz. Naturschutz report. Rauhfusskauz und Sperlingskauz in Deutschland. Thütinger Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Naturschutz und Umwelt. 122–131.Google Scholar
Austin, O.L. 1948. The birds of Korea. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard College 101: 1–301.Google Scholar
Avilés, J.M. and Parejo, D. 2012. Covariation between bill colouration and fitness components in a nocturnal bird. Journal of Avian Biology 43: 565–570.Google Scholar
Avilés, J.M. and Parejo, D. 2013. Colour also matters for nocturnal birds: owlet bill coloration advertises quality and influences parental feeding behaviour in Little Owls. Oecologia 173: 399–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagnoli, P., Fontanesi, G., Casini, G. and Porciatti, V. 1990. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. I: Anatomical investigation of the Thalamo Wulst Pathway. Brain Behavior and Evolution 35: 31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, E.C.S. 1926. Description of a new subspecies of little owl (Carine brema fryi) from Madras, with remarks in the distribution of the species. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists Club 40 -60: 61.Google Scholar
Baker, J., French, K. and Whelan, R.J. 2002. The edge effect and ecotonal species: bird communities across a natural edge in southeastern Australia. Ecology 83: 3048–3059.Google Scholar
Balmer, D.E., Gillings, S., Caffrey, B.J., et al. 2013. Bird Atlas 2007–11: The Breeding and Wintering Birds of Britain and Ireland. Thetford: BTO Books.Google Scholar
Bangs, O. and Peters, J.L. 1928. Birds collected by Dr. Joseph F. Rock in Western Kansu and Eastern Tibet. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 68: 330–331.Google Scholar
Bannermann, D.A. 1955. The Birds of the British Isles. Vol. 4. Edinburgh, London: Oliver and Boyd, 198–207.Google Scholar
Barabash-Nikiforov, I.I. and Semago, L.L. 1963. PtitsyYugo Vostoka chernozemnogo tsentra [Birds of the Southeast of Black-Earth Centre]. Voronezh: Voronezh University Press [In Russian].Google Scholar
Barber, W.E. 1925. Increase of Little Owl in north Lancashire. British Birds 19: 26.Google Scholar
Bart, J. and Robson, D.S. 1995. Design of a monitoring program for northern spotted owls. In Ralph, C.J., Sauer, J.R. and Droege, S. (eds.), Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 75–81.Google Scholar
Barthelemy, E. and Bertrand, P. 1997. Recensement de la Chevêche d’Athéna Athene noctua dans le massif du Garlaban (Bouches-du-Rhône) Faune de Provence. Bulletin du Conservatoire et Etudes des Ecosystèmes de Provence 18: 61–66.Google Scholar
Baudvin, H. 1997. Barn owl (Tyto alba) and Long-eared Owl (Asio otus) mortality along motorways in Bourgogne-Champagne: report and suggestions. In Duncan, J.R., Johnson, D.H. and Nichols, T.H. (eds.), Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere: 2nd International Symposium, 1997 February 5–9 1997, Winnipeg, Manitoba. General Technical Report NC-190. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Forest Service, 58–61.Google Scholar
Bauer, H.G. 1987. Geburtsortstreue und Streuungsverhalten junger Singvögel. Vogelwarte 34: 15–32.Google Scholar
Bauer, H.-G. and Berthold, P. 1996. Die Brutvögel Mitteleuropas: Bestand und Gefährdung. Wiesbaden: Aula-Verlag, 254–256.Google Scholar
Bauer, H.-G., Berthold, P., Boye, P., et al. 2002. Rote Liste der Brutvögel Deutschlands: 3. Überarbeitete Fassung. Berlin Vogelschutz 39: 13–60.Google Scholar
Bauer, H.-G., Bezzel, E. and Fiedler, W. 2005. Nonpasseriformes: Nichtsperlingsvögel. Das Kompendium der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Wiebelsheim: Aula-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bauer, S. and Thielcke, G. 1982. Gefährdete Brutvogelarten in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und im Land Berlin: Bestandsentwicklung, Gefährdungsursachen und Schutzmassnahmen. Vogelwarte 31: 265–267.Google Scholar
Baumgart, W. 1980. Wodurch ist der Steinkauz bedroht? Falke 27: 228–229.Google Scholar
Bavoux, C. and Burneleau, G. 1983. Statut des rapaces nocturnes à l’Ile d’Oléron. Bulletin du Groupe Ornithologique Aunis-Saintonge 13: 64–68.Google Scholar
BBS Report 2011. The Breeding Bird Survey 2011. www.bto.org/our-science/projects/bbs/bbs-publications/bbs-reports (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Bednarek, W., Hausdorf, W., Jörissen, U., Schulte, E. and Wegener, H. 1975. Über die Auswirkung der chemischen Umwelt belastung auf Greifvögel in zwei Probeflächen Westfalen. Journal für Ornithologie 116: 184–185.Google Scholar
Bednarz, J., Kupczyk, M., Kuźniak, S. and Winiecki, A. 2000. Birds of the Poznań Region. Faunistic Monograph. Poznań: Bogucki Scientific Publications [In Polish].Google Scholar
Beersma, P. and Beersma, W. 2000. Temperatuurmetingen in nestkasten voor Steenuilen Athene noctua. Vogeljaar 48: 269–271.Google Scholar
Beersma, P. and Beersma, W. 2001. Little Owls Athene noctua and biocides: reasons for concern? In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.), The Little Owl in Flanders in its International Context. Proceedings of the Second International Little Owl Symposium, 16–18 March 2001, Geraardsbergen, Belgium. Oriolus 67: 94–99.Google Scholar
Behl, S. 2006. Steinkauz – Athene noctua. In: Eichstädt, W., Scheller, W., Sellin, D., Starke, W. and Stegemann, K.D. (eds.), Atlas der Brutvögel in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Friedland: Steffen Verlag, 238–239.Google Scholar
Bekaert, M. 2006. Onderzoek naar de invloed van intrinsieke en extrinsieke limiterende factoren op het reproductief succes van de Steenuil (Athene noctua). Scriptie voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Master in de Biologie. Universiteit Gent.Google Scholar
Bel’skaya, G.S. 1992. Osobennosti biologii ptits v aridnykh usloviyakh [Features of Bird Biology in Arid Conditions]. Asgabat: Ylym Press, 222–248.Google Scholar
Benjes, H. 1997. Die Vernetzung von Lebensräumen mit Benjeshecken. 9. Auflage. München: Verlag Natur and Umwelt.Google Scholar
Benton, T.G., Bryant, D.M., Cole, L. and Crick, H.Q.P. 2002. Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berce, T. 2019. Čuk Athene noctua. In:Mihelič, T., Kmecl, P., Denac, K., et al. (eds.), Atlas Ptic Slovenije: Popis Gnezdilk 2002–2017. Ljubljana: DOPPS, 202–203.Google Scholar
Berce, T. and Kmecl, P. 2008. Popis Čuka Athene noctua na Krasu v Letu 2007: Zaključno Poročilo. Ljubljana: DOPPS.Google Scholar
Berce, T., Hladnik, P., Hönigsfeld Adamič, M., Nekrep, I. and Gregorc, T. 2014. Čukov dom na Barju: Zaključno Poročilo Projekta. Ljubljana: Lutra, Inštitut za Ohranjanje Naravne Dediščine.Google Scholar
Berg, H.-M. 2002. Eulen in Österreich: Forschung und Schutz–ein Überblick. Eulen-Rundblick, AG Eulen 50: 53–55.Google Scholar
Bergerud, A. 1984. Changement de proie dans un écosystème simple. Pour la Science 1984: 76–85.Google Scholar
Berghmans, H. 2001a. Little Owl Athene noctua preying on dead day-old chickens, Natuur.oriolus 68: 191.Google Scholar
Berghmans, H. 2001b. Shell of snail Cepaea nemoralis in pellet of Little Owl Athene noctua. Natuur.oriolus 68: 194.Google Scholar
Berghmans, H. 2001c. Nest box with two incubating female Little Owls Athene noctua and nine chicks: a case of bigamy? Natuur.oriolus 68: 192–193.Google Scholar
Berghmans, H. 2001d. Adult Little Owl Athene noctua sharing nest box with three Jackdow Corvus monedula chicks. Natuur.oriolus 68: 191.Google Scholar
Bergier, P., Thévenot, M., Qninba, A., Houllier, J.-R. and Isenmann, P. 2017. Little Owl. In: Oiseaux du Sahara Atlantique Marocain [Birds of the Moroccan Atlantic Sahara]. Bruxelles: Societé d’Etudes Ornithologiques de Belgique, 162–163.Google Scholar
Bergmann, H.H. and Helb, H.-W. 1982. Stimmen der Vögel Europas. München: Aula-Verlag.Google Scholar
Berthold, P. 2000. Vogelzug: eine kurze, aktuelle Gesamtübersicht. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Bettmann, H. 1951. Waldkauz oder Steinkauz. Ornithologische Mitteilungen 3: 132–133.Google Scholar
Beven, G. 1979. Little Owl’s method of catching cockchafers. British Birds 72: 594–595.Google Scholar
Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D. and Hill, D.A. 1992. Bird Census Techniques. London: B.T.O. – R.S.P.B., Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bijlsma, R.G., Hustings, F. and Camphuysen, C.J. 2001. Algemene en schaarse vogels van Nederland (Avifauna van Nederland 2). Haarlem/Utrecht: GMB Uitgeverij/KNNV Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Binnemans, I., Desmarets, G. and Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. 2021. Onderzoek naar voorkomen en trend Steenuil in Vlaanderen tussen 2000 en 2020: Burgerwetenschap in de praktijk. Natuurpunt.Oriolus 87: 90–97.Google Scholar
BirdLife International 2004. Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International, 163.Google Scholar
BirdLife International 2015. European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Publications of the European Union.Google Scholar
Birdlife International and Durham University 2022. Species Climate Change Impacts Factsheet: Noctua. www.birdlife.org (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Birrer, S. 2021. Birds as prey of owls: an intra- and interspecific comparison. In Roque, I., Duncan, J.R., Johnson, D.H. and Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 World Owl Conference, Evora, Portugal. Vol. 29. Lisbon: Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves, 35–45.Google Scholar
Bisseling, G.A.L. 1933. Een partieel albinistische Steenuil, Athene noctua vidalii A.E. Brehm Orgaan Club Ned. Vogelkd 5: 170.Google Scholar
Blache, S. 2001. Etude du régime alimentaire de la Chevêche d’Athéna (Athene noctua Scop.) en période de reproduction en zone agricole intensive dans le sud-est de la Belgique. In Génot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), Chouette Chevêche et Territoires: Actes du Colloque International de Champ-sur-Marne, 25 et 26 Novembre 2000. Ciconia 25: 77–94.Google Scholar
Blache, S. 2004. La Chevêche (Athene noctua) en zone d’agriculture intensive (plaine de Valence; Drôme): habitat, alimentation, repoduction. Mémoire. Diplôme Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Blagosklonov, C. 1968. Guide de la protection des oiseaux utiles. Moscou: MIR 246.Google Scholar
Blakesley, J.A., Noon, B.R. and Shaw, D.W.H. 2001. Demography of the California Spotted Owl in northeastern California. Condor 103: 667.Google Scholar
Blanc, T. 1958 . Au garde-manger hivernal de la Chevêche. Nos Oiseaux 24: 321.Google Scholar
Blanke, E. 2003. Steenuilen in de gemeente Raalte in 2003. Athene Nieuswbrief STONE 8: 43–44.Google Scholar
Blanke, E. 2005. Steenuilen en steenmarters: een probleem? Athene Nieuwsbrief STONE 10: 7–13.Google Scholar
Blas, García, J. and Muñoz, Gallego, A.R. 2003. In Martí, R. and Del Moral, J.C. (eds.), Atlas de las Aves Reproductoras de España. Madrid: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-Sociedad Española de Ornitología.Google Scholar
Bloem, H., Boer, K., Groen, N., Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2001. De Steenuil in Nederland: Handleiding voor onderzoek en bescherming. STONE.Google Scholar
Blondel, J. and Badan, O. 1976. La biologie du Hibou grand-duc en Provence. Nos Oiseaux 33: 212-213.Google Scholar
Blyth, E. In Hutton, T. 1847. Rough notes on the ornithology of Candahar and its neighbourhood. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 16: 776–777.Google Scholar
Bock, A. 2011. Roosting Site Selection of Little Owls (Athene noctua) in Southern Germany. Bachelor thesis, University of Marburg, 1–48.Google Scholar
Bock, A., Naef-Daenzer, B., Keil, H., et al. 2013. Roost site selection by Little Owls Athene noctua in relation to environmental conditions and life-history stages. Ibis 155: 847–856.Google Scholar
Bogdanov, A.N. 1956. [Birds of the Zerafshan River basin]. Part 1. Proceedings of the Institute of Zoology and Parasitology of the Ac Sc of the Uzbek SSR 5: 107–163 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Boie, H. 1822 . Über Classification insonderheit der europäischen Vögel. Isis von Oken 10, 11: col. 549, Jena.Google Scholar
Bon, M., Scarton, F., Stival, E., Sattin, L. and Sgorlon, G. (eds.), 2014. Nuovo Atlante Degli Uccelli Nidificanti e Svernanti in Provincia di Venezia. Venezia: Associazione Faunisti Veneti, Museo di Storia Naturale di.Google Scholar
Bonin, B. and Strenna, L. 1986. Sur la biologie du Faucon crécerelle, Falco tinnunculus, en Auxois. Alauda 54: 251.Google Scholar
Bönsel, A. 2001 . Erste Ergebnisse zum Wiederansiedlungsprojekt des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Kiel: Landesverband Eulen-Schutz im Schleswig-Holstein Eulenwelt, 29–31.Google Scholar
Bonvicini, P. and Maino, M. 1993. Predazione di barbagianni Tyto alba su Civetta Athene noctua in provincia di Arezzo. Picus 19: 69.Google Scholar
Borgsteede, H.M., Okulewicz, A., Zoun, P.E.F. and Okulewicz, J. 2003. The helminth fauna of birds of prey (Accipitriformes, Falconiformes and Strigiformes) in the Netherlands. Acta Parasitologica 48: 200–207.Google Scholar
Bortolotti, G.R., Tella, J.L., Forero, M.G., Dawson, R.D. and Negro, J.J. 2000. Genetics, local environment and health as factors influencing plasma carotenoids in wild American kestrels (Falco sparverius). Proceedings of the Royal Society B 267: 1433–1438.Google Scholar
Bouchy, P. 2004. Analyse Démo-génétique de Viabilité dans le Cas de Petites Populations Fragmentées: Applications à la Chouette Chevêche (Athene noctua). Thèse de doctorat Université Paris 6 Pierre et Marie Curie.Google Scholar
Božič, L. and Vrezec, A. 2000. Sove Pohorja [Owls of the Pohorje Mountains]. Acrocephalus 21: 47–53.Google Scholar
Bozó, L. and Csathó, A.I. 2017. The status and population changes of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the south of Békés county (Hungary). Ornis Hungarica 25: 23–33.Google Scholar
Bračko, F. and Štumberger, B. 2017. Čuk Athene noctua Acrocephalus 37: 71–72.Google Scholar
Brands, R. 1980. Beiträge zur Brutbiologie des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Staatsexamensarb. University of Köln.Google Scholar
Brandt, T., Buschmann, H. and Zukowski, S. 2012. Zur Situation des Steinkauzes Athene noctua in Niedersachsen: Ergebnisse einer landesweiten Erfassung in den Jahren 2008 und 2009. Vogelkundliche Berichte aus Niedersachsen 43: 1–14.Google Scholar
Brehm, A.E. 1857. Allgemeine Deutsche Naturhistorische Zeitung Isis, neue Folge, 3, Heft: 11 440.Google Scholar
Brehm, C.L. 1855. Athene indigena. In Der vollständige Vögelsang: Eine gründliche Anleitung alle europaischen Vögel. Weimar: B. Voigt, 37.Google Scholar
Bretagnolle, V., Bavoux, C., Burneleau, G. and Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. 2001. In Génot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), Abondance et distribution des Chevêches d’Athéna: approche méthodologique pour des enquêtes à grande échelle en plaine céréalière. Ciconia 25: 173–184.Google Scholar
Breuer, W. 1998. Berücksichtigung von Steinkauzehabitaten in der Flächennutzungsplanung am Beispiel von drei nordrhein-westfälischen Gemeinden. Natur und Landschaft 73: 175–180.Google Scholar
Brichetti, P. 1997. L’avifauna nidificante. In Brichetti, P. and Gariboldi, A. (eds.), Manuale Pratico di Ornitologia. Bologna: Edagricole, 259–267.Google Scholar
Brichetti, P. and Fracasso, G. 2006. Ornitologia Italiana. Vol. 3 Stercorariidae – Caprimulgidae. Bologna: Alberto Perdisa Editore.Google Scholar
Brichetti, P. and Fracasso, G. 2020. The Birds of Italy. Vol. 2 Pteroclidae – Locustellidae. Latina: Edizioni Belvedere.Google Scholar
Brodkorp, P. 1971. Catalogue of fossil birds, Part 4 (Columbiformes through Piciformes). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences 15: 163–266.Google Scholar
Broekema, H. 2014. Inanna, Heerseres van Hemel en Aarde. Leeuwarden: Elikser Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Broekhuizen, S., Spoelstra, K., Thissen, J.B.M. and Canters, K.J. (eds.). 2006. Atlas van de Nederlandse Zoogdieren. Natuur van Nederland 12. Leiden: Naturalis Biodiversity Center and EIS Kenniscentrum en Andere Ongewervelden and Zoogdiervereniging.Google Scholar
Broekhuizen, S., van’t Hoff, J., Jansen, L.A. and Niewold, F.J.J. 1980. Application of radio tracking in wildlife research in the Netherlands. In Amlaner, C.J. and Mac Donald, D.W. A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking. Oxford: Perjamon Press, 65–84.Google Scholar
Broun, L.V. 1986. Osobennosti stroeniya zheludochno-kishechnogo traktaplotoyadnykh ptits v svyazi s pishchevoi spetsializatsiei [Peculiarities of the anatomy of digestive tract of bird-myophages in connection with feeding specialization]. In Izuchenie Ptits SSSR, ikh Okhrana i Ratsional’noe iSPOL’zovanie [The study of birds of the U.S.S.R., their protection and wise management]. Proceedings of the 1st Meeting of All-Union Ornithology Society and 9th All-Union Ornithology Conference, Leningrad. Part 1, 99–100 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Brunelli, M., Sarrocco, S., Corbi, F., et al. (eds.), 2011. Nuovo atlante degli uccelli nidificanti nel Lazio. Roma: Edizioni ARP.Google Scholar
Büchi, O. 1952. Forte mortalité de rapaces nocturnes dans le canton de Fribourg Nos Oiseaux 21: 224.Google Scholar
Bultot, J. 1996. Opération Chevêche. L’Homme et l’Oiseau 2: 101–107.Google Scholar
Bultot, J., Marie, P. and Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. 2001. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.), Population dynamics of Little Owl Athene noctua in Wallonia and its driving forces. Evidence for density-dependence. Oriolus 67: 110–125.Google Scholar
Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Burton, P.J.K. 1983. Little Owl raiding Starling’s nest. British Birds 76: 314–315.Google Scholar
Bušina, T. 2021. Reinforcement of declining little owl (Athene noctua): a peculiar case of habitat selection and underground roosting. Global Ecology and Conservation 28: e01656.Google Scholar
Busse, H. 1983. Der Steinkauz. Falke 30: 34–35.Google Scholar
Cameron-Brown, F.A. 1975. Little Owl behaviour. Gloucestershire Naturalists’ Society Journal 26: 83–84.Google Scholar
Campedelli, T., Buvoli, I., Bonazzi, P., et al. 2012. Andamenti di popolazione delle specie comuni nidificanti in Italia: 2000–2011. Avocetta 36: 121–143.Google Scholar
Capanna, E., Civitelli, M.V. and Martinico, E. 1987. I cromosomi degli uccelli. Citotassonomia ed evoluzione cariotipica. Avocetta 11: 101–123.Google Scholar
Carneiro, M., Colaço, B., Colaço, J., et al. 2016. Biomonitoring of metals and metalloids with raptors from Portugal and Spain: a review. Environmental Reviews 24: 63–83.Google Scholar
Carvalho, D. 2009. Woman has two faces: re-examining Eve and Lilith in the Jewish feminist mindset. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 115.Google Scholar
Casalini, R. 2005. Attivita di Mobbing nei confronti di Athene noctua (Scopoli, 1769) in un ambiente mediterraneo. In Mastrorilli, M., Nappi, A. and Barattieri, M. (eds.), Atti I Convegno Italiano sulla Civetta. Bariano: Gruppo Italiano Civette, 41–44.Google Scholar
Casini, G., Fontanesi, G., Porciatti, V. and Bagnoli, P. 1988. Anatomical and functional organization of the visual wulst in the owl Athene noctua. European Journal of Neuroscience 39: 12–15.Google Scholar
Casini, G., Porciatti, V., Fontanesi, G. and Bagnoli, P. 1992. Wulst efferents in the Little Owl Athene noctua: an investigation of projections to the optic tectum. Brain Behavior and Evolution 39: 101–115.Google Scholar
Castellucci, M. and Zavalloni, D. 1989. Predazione di barbagianni, Tyto alba, su civetta, Athene noctua. Rivista Italiana di Ornithologia 59: 282–283.Google Scholar
Centili, D. 1996. Censimento, distribuzione e habitat della Civetta Athene noctua in un’area dei monti della Tolfa. Tesi. Universita “La Sapienza”, Roma.Google Scholar
Centili, D. 2001. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.) Playback and Little Owls Athene noctua: preliminary results and considerations. Oriolus 67: 88–93.Google Scholar
Cesaris, C. 1988. Populazioni di Alloco Strix aluco e di Civetta Athene noctua in un’area del Parco Lombardo della Valle del Tiano. Avocetta 12: 115–118.Google Scholar
Charter, M., Leshem, Y., Izhaki, I., Guershon, M. and Kiat, Y. 2006. The diet of the Little Owl, Athene noctua, in Israel. Zoology in the Middle East 39: 31–40.Google Scholar
Chenchouni, H. 2014. Diet of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) during the pre-reproductive period in a semi-arid mediterranean region. Zoology and Ecology 24: 314–323.Google Scholar
Cheylan, G. 1986. Inventaire ornithologique préliminaire des îles de Marseille. Faune de Provence. Bulletin du Conservatoire et Etudes des Ecosystèmes de Provence 7: 30–38.Google Scholar
Chodkiewicz, T., Chylarecki, P., Sikora, A., et al. 2019. Raport z wdrażania Art. 12 Dyrektywy Ptasiej w Polsce w latach 2013–2018: Stan, zmiany, zagrożenia. Biuletyn Monitoringu Przyrody 20: 1–80.Google Scholar
Chodkiewicz, T., Kuczyński, L., Sikora, A., et al. 2015. Ocena liczebności populacji ptaków lęgowych w Polsce w latach 2008–2012. Ornis Polonica 56: 149–192.Google Scholar
Chrenková, M., Dobrý, M. and Šálek, M. 2017. Further evidence of large-scale population decline and range contraction of the little owl Athene noctua in Central Europe. Folia Zoologica 66: 106–116.Google Scholar
Chrenková, M., Jacobsen, L.B., Sunde, P., Šálek, M. and Thorup, K. 2012. Effect of conservation measures on breeding success and working effort of little owls. Sborník Abstraktů z Konference 9–10 Února 2012.Google Scholar
Christie, D. and Van Woudenberg, A. 1997. Modeling critical habitat for flammulated owls (Otus flammeolus). In Duncan, J.R., Johnson, D.H. and Nicholls, T.H. (eds.), Biology and Conservation of Owls on the Northern Hemisphere: 2nd International Symposium; 1997 February 5–9; Winnipeg, General Technical Report NC-190. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, 97–106.Google Scholar
Christie, H.H.V. 1931. Buzzard killing Little Owl. British Birds 24: 367.Google Scholar
Chylarecki, P. and Sikora, A. 2007. Ocena liczebności gatunków lęgowych w Polsce. In Sikora, A., Rohde, Z., Gromadzki, M., Neubauer, G. and Chylarecki, P. (eds.), Atlas Rozmieszczenia Ptaków Lęgowych Polski 1985–2004. Poznań: Bogucki Wyd. Nauk., 34–41.Google Scholar
Cichon, M. 2003. Does prior breeding experience improve reproductive success in collared flycatcher females? Oecologia 134: 78–81.Google Scholar
Cieślak, M. 2017. Feathers of European Owls: Insights into Species Ecology and Identification. Uppsala: Oriolus Forläg.Google Scholar
Clec’h, D. 1993. La Chouette chevêche Athene noctua en Bretagne. Ar Vran 4: 5–34.Google Scholar
Clec’h, D. 2001a. Impact de la circulation routière sur la Chevêche d’Athéna, Athene noctua, par l’étude de la localisation de ses sites de reproduction. Alauda 69: 255–260.Google Scholar
Clec’h, D. 2001b. In Genot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), Etude d’une population de Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Haut-Léon (Bretagne-France). Ciconia 25: 119–128.Google Scholar
Clements, J.F., Schulenberg, T.S., Iliff, M.J., et al. 2015. The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: v2015. https://ebird.org/news/taxonomy-update-for-2015/ (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Clewley, G.D., Norfolk, D.L., Leech, D.I. and Balmer, D.E. 2016. Playback survey trial for the Little Owl Athene noctua in the UK. Bird Study 63: 268–272.Google Scholar
Collinge, W.E. 1922. The Little Owl. Bird Notes and News 10: 21–23.Google Scholar
Coppée, J.-L., Bultot, J. and Hanus, B. 1995. Population et reproduction de la Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua) en Hainaut. Protection et Restauration de ses Habitats Aves 32: 73–99.Google Scholar
Cornulier, T. and Bretagnolle, V. 2006. Assessing the influence of environmental heterogeneity on bird spacing patterns: a case study with two raptors. Ecography 29: 240–250.Google Scholar
Corti, M., Podofillini, S., Griggio, M., et al. 2018. Sequence variation in melanocortin-1-receptor and tyrosinase-related protein1 genes and their relationship with melanin-based plumage trait expression in Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni) males. Journal of Ornithology 159: 587–591.Google Scholar
Costaglia, A., Lepore, G., De Falco, G. and Cecio, A. 1981. Neuroistologia comparata dell’esofago in uccelli granivori onnivori e carnivori. Atti della Societa Italiana die Scienze Veterinarie 35: 323–324.Google Scholar
Courtois, J.-M. 1988. Deux lépidoptères commensaux de la Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua). Ciconia 12 : 177.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. 1983. Species concept and speciation analysis. In Johnston, R.F. (ed.), Current Ornithology. Vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press, 159–187.Google Scholar
Cramp, S. 1963. Toxic chemicals and birds of prey. British Birds 56: 129–130.Google Scholar
Cramp, S. (ed.) 1985. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. 4. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 514–525.Google Scholar
Cramp, S. 1998. Cramp’s The Complete Birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford: Optimedia, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crespon, J. 1840. Ornithologie du Gard et des pays circonvoisins. Nismes: Chez Bianquis-Gignoux.Google Scholar
Csermely, D., Casagrande, S. and Sponza, S. 2002. Adaptative details in the comparison predatory behaviour of four owl species. Italian Journal of Zoology 69: 239–243.Google Scholar
Curio, E. 1963. Probleme des Feinderkennens bei Vögeln. Proceedings of the 13th International Ornithological Congress, Ithaca, 17–24 June 1963. Lawrence, KS: American Ornithologists’ Union, 206–239.Google Scholar
d’Hamonville, L. 1895. Les Oiseaux de la Lorraine (Meuse, Meurthe, Moselle et Vosges). Nancy: Sidot Frères.Google Scholar
Dalbeck, L. 2003. Der Uhu Bubo bubo (L.) in Deutschland: Autökologische Analysen an einer Wieder Angesiedelten Population. Resümee eines Artenschutzprojekts. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
Dalbeck, L., Bergerhausen, W. and Hachtel, M. 1999a. Habitatpräferenzen des Steinkauzes Athene noctua SCOPOLI, 1769 im ortsnahen Grünland. Charadrius 35: 100–115.Google Scholar
Dalbeck, L., Bergerhausen, W. and Hachtel, M. 1999b. Habitatpräferenzen des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) im ortsnahen Grünland. Eulen-Rundblick, AG Eulen 4849: 3–15.Google Scholar
Damgaard, C. and Weiner, J. 2000. Describing inequality in plant size or fecundity. Ecology 81: 1139–1142.Google Scholar
Danko, S. 1985a. Report on activities of the group for research and protection of birds of prey and owls in Czechoslovakia in 1982. Bulletin of World Working Group on Birds of Prey 2: 48.Google Scholar
Danko, S. 1985b. Report on activities of the group for research and protection of birds of prey and owls in Czechoslovakia in 1983. Bulletin of World Working Group on Birds of Prey 2: 50.Google Scholar
Danko, S. 1986. Report on activities of the group for research and protection of birds of prey and owls in Czechoslovakia in 1986. Buteo 1: 22.Google Scholar
Danko, S. 1989. Report on activities of the group for research and protection of birds of prey and owls in Czechoslovakia in 1989. Buteo 4: 1–28.Google Scholar
Danko, S., Chavko, J. and Karaska, D. 1995. Report on the activity of the Group on Protection of Birds of Prey and Owls in the Slovak Republik in 1993. Buteo 7: 109–121; 132–148.Google Scholar
Danko, Š., Darolová, A. and Krištín, A. 2002. Bird Distribution in Slovakia. Bratislava: Veda, Vydavatelstv SAV.Google Scholar
Dawson-Smith, F. 1913. British owls. Bird Notes and News 4: 169.Google Scholar
De Smet, A. 2019. De steenuil voor de vijfde maal gebiedsdekkend geïnventariseerd in Zeeuws Vlaanderen. Uilen 9: 56–67.Google Scholar
DeCesare, N.J., Hebblewhite, M., Schmiegelow, F., et al. 2012. Transcending scale dependence in identifying habitat with resource selection functions. Ecological Applications 22: 1068–1083.Google Scholar
Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J. 1999. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 5. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.Google Scholar
Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J. and Christie, D. 2016. Handbook of the Birds of the World (HBW). Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.Google Scholar
Delamain, J. 1938. Portraits d’Oiseaux. Paris: Stock, 59–62.Google Scholar
Delibes, M., Brunet-Lecomte, P. and Manez, M. 1983. Datos sobre la alimentacion de la Lechuza comun (Tyto alba), el Buho Chico (Asio otus) y el Mochuelo (Athene noctua) en una misma localidad de Castilla la Vieja. Ardeola 30: 57–63.Google Scholar
Delmée, E. 1988. In Devillers, P., Roggeman, W., Tricot, J., et al. (eds.), Atlas des Oiseaux Nicheurs de Belgique. Bruxelles: Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 172.Google Scholar
Dementiev, G. 1931. Sur quelques points de systématique et de nomenclature. Alauda 3: 258–259.Google Scholar
Dementiev, G. and Gladkov, N.A. 1951. Ptitsy Sovetskogo Soyuza [Birds of the Soviet Union]. Moskva: Akademii Nauk, 440–447.Google Scholar
Dempsey, E. and O’Clery, M. 1993. The Complete Guide to Ireland’s Birds. Dublin: Gill.Google Scholar
Denac, D., Marcic, M., Radolic, P. and Tomazic, A. 2002. Sove v cerkvah, gradovih in drugih objektih na obmocju Vipavske doline [Owls in churches, castles and other buildings in the Vipava valley and the Karst (SW Slovenia)]. Acrocephalus 23: 91–95.Google Scholar
Desmots, D. 1988. Prédation de Moineaux domestiques (Passer domesticus) par une Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua). Biotopes 54(6): 44–45.Google Scholar
Díaz, M., Asensio, B. and Tellería, J.L. 1996. Aves Ibéricas. I. No Paserifiomes. Madrid: J.M. Reyero Editores.Google Scholar
Dickinson, E.C. and Remsen, J.V. 2013. The Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World, Vol. 1: Non-passerines. Eastbourne: Aves Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Dobinson, H.M. and Richards, A.J. 1964. The effects of the severe winter of 1962/63 on birds in Britain. British Birds 57: 391–392.Google Scholar
Dolinar, I. 1951. Ptici v obmocju Savinjske doline pred 45 leti in danes. Lovec 34: 8–12.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, A., Fronczak, J., Kowalski, M. and Lippoman, T. 1991. Liczebnosc i preferencje srodowiskowe sow Strigiformes na terenach rolniczych Niziny Mazowieckiej [Population density and habitat preferences of owls Strigiformes on agricultural areas of Marowsze Lowland (Central Poland)]. Acta Ornitholecologica 26: 39–53.Google Scholar
Donovan, T.M., Beardmore, C.J., Bonter, D.N., et al. 2002. Priority research needs for the conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Journal of Field Ornithology 73: 329–450.Google Scholar
du Feu, C.R., Clark, J.A., Schaub, M., Fiedler, W. and Baillie, S.R. 2016. The EURING Data Bank – a critical tool for continental-scale studies of marked birds. Ringing and Migration 31: 1–18.Google Scholar
Dugas, M.B. 2009. House sparrow, Passer domesticus, parents preferentially feed nestlings with mouth colours that appear carotenoid-rich. Animal Behaviour 78: 767–772.Google Scholar
Dupond, C. 1943. Les Oiseaux de la Belgique. Bruxelles: Patrimoine du Musée Royal d’Histoire naturelle de Belgique, 71–72.Google Scholar
Dvorak, M., Landmann, A., Teufelbauer, N., et al. 2017. Erhaltungszustand und Gefährdungssituation der Brutvögel Österreichs: Rote Liste (5. Fassung) und Liste für den Vogelschutz prioritärer Arten (1. Fassung). Egretta 5: 6–42.Google Scholar
Dyrcz, A., Grabiński, W., Stawarczyk, T. and Witkowski, J. 1991. Birds of the Silesian Region: A Faunistic Monograph. Wrocław: Warsaw University, Department of Bird Ecology [In Polish].Google Scholar
Eakle, W.L. 1994. A raptor survey in western Turkey and eastern Greece. Journal of Raptor Research 28: 186–191.Google Scholar
Edwards, C.A. and Bohlen, P.J. 1996. Biology and Ecology of Earthworms, third edition. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Eick, M.J. 2003. Habitatnutzung und Dismigration des Steinkauzes Athene noctua. Diplomarbeit. Universität Hohenheim, Institut für Zoologie.Google Scholar
Elith, J. Philips, S.J., Hastie, T., et al. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17: 43–57.Google Scholar
Elliott, J.S. 1940. Little Owl preying on birds. British Birds 33: 312–313.Google Scholar
Ellis, J.C.S. 1946. Lttle Owl’s method of taking pheasant chick by daylight. British Birds 39: 217.Google Scholar
Elzinga, C.L., Salzer, D.W. and Willoughby, J.W. 1998. Measuring and Monitoring Plant Populations. Denver, CO: Bureau of Land Management.Google Scholar
Enehjelm Af, C. 1969. Breeding owls. The Avicultural Magazine 72: 56.Google Scholar
Enriquez, P.L. and Mikkola, H. 1997. Comparative study of general public owl knowledge in Costa Rica, Central America and Malawi, Africa. In Duncan, J.R., Johnson, D.H. and Nichols, T.H. (eds.), Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere: 2nd International Symposium, February 5–9 1997, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. General Technical Report NC-190. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Forest Service, 160–166.Google Scholar
Equipa Atlas 2008. Atlas des Aves Nidificantes em Portugal (1999–2005). Lisboa: Assírio and Alvim.Google Scholar
Erkert, H. 1967. Beleuchtungsabhängige Aktivitätsoptima bei Eulen und circadiane Regel. Naturwissenschaften 54: 231–232.Google Scholar
Estoppey, F. 1992. Une densité élevée de Chouettes chevêches, Athene noctua, dans la plaine du Pô en Italie. Nos Oiseaux 41: 315–319.Google Scholar
Etienne, P. 2003. La reproduction de la Chouette chevêche Athene noctua. Parades et Occupations de l’espace Avocette Numéro spécial: 113–116.Google Scholar
Etienne, P. 2012. La Chouette chevêche, Biologie, Répartition et Relations avec l’Homme. Mièze: Biotope.Google Scholar
European Environment Agency 2021. Reporting under Article 12 of the Birds Directive. www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-bd/activities/reporting/article-12 (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. 1981. Zur Nistökologie des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Vogelwelt 102: 161–180.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. 1983. Habitat, Siedlungsdichte und Brutbiologie einer niederrheinischen Steinkauzpopulation (Athene noctua). Ökologie der Vögel 5: 1–40.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. 1984. Die akustische Unterscheidung von Steinkauz-männchen und-weibchen (Athene noctua). Journal für Ornithologie 125: 94–97.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. 1987. Das Territorialverhalten des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Eine verhaltensökologie Studie mit Hilfe der Telemetrie. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. 1988. Jahreszeitliche ökologische Anpassungen des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Journal für Ornithologie 129: 393–415.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. 1989. Tagesperiodische Aktivitätmuster des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Vogelwarte 35: 94–114.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. 1990. Geographische Variation des Reviergesangs beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua): ein Vergleich des gesangs nordwestdeutscher und ostenglischer. Vögel Vogelwarte 35: 279–286.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. 1991. Der Untere Niederrhein – ein Verbreitungsschwerpunkt des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). In Mitteleuropa. Natur und Landschaft 66: 156–159.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. 1992. Population ecology of Little Owl Athene noctua in Central Europe: a review. In Galbraith, C.A., Taylor, I.R. and Percival, S. (eds.), The Conservation and Ecology of European Owls, Peterborough. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 64–75.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. and Hennes, R. 1978. Empfehlungen zur Methodik von Siedlungsdichte Untersuchungen vom Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Vogelwelt 99: 137–141.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. and Hennes, R. 1980. Beitrag zur Populationsökologie des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua): eine Analyse deutscher und niederländischer Ringfunde. Vogelwarte 30: 162–179.Google Scholar
Exo, K.-M. and Scherzinger, W. 1989. Stimme und Lautrepertoire des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua): Beschreibung, Kontext und Lebensraumanpassung. Ökologie der Vögel 11: 149–187.Google Scholar
Faivre, B., Gregorie, A., Preault, M., Cezilly, F. and Sorci, G. 2003. Immune activation rapidly mirrored in a secondary sexual trait. Science 300: 103.Google Scholar
Fajardo, I., Pividal, V., Trigo, M. and Jimenez, M. 1998. Habitat selection, activity peaks and strategies to avoid road mortality by the Little Owl Athene noctua: a new methodology on owls research. Alauda 66: 49–60.Google Scholar
Falcone, S. 1987. Rapaci abbattuti illegalmente in Sicilia. Rapaci Mediterranei III. Supplemento alle Ricerche di Biologia della Selvaggina (Atti del IV Colloquio, Sant’Antioco, Cagliari, 11–13 ottobre 1984 12: 93–95.Google Scholar
Farsky, O. 1928. De l’utilité de Quelques Oiseaux de Proie et Corvidés Déterminée par l’Examen de Leurs Aliments. Thèse de Docteur en Sciences. Nancy: Ancienne impr. Vagner, 99–103.Google Scholar
Fattebert, J., Michel, V., Scherlera, P., et al. 2018. Little owls in big landscapes: informing conservation using multi-level resource selection functions. Biological Conservation 228: 1–9.Google Scholar
Fattorini, S., Manganaro, A., Ranazzi, L., Cento, M. and Salvati, L. 2000. Insect predation by Little Owl, Athene noctua, in different habitats of Central Italy. Rivista Italiana di Ornithologia 70: 139–142.Google Scholar
Ferrer, D., Molina, R., Castella, J. and Kinsella, J.M. 2004. Parasitic helminths in the digestive tract of six species of owls (Strigiformes) in Spain. The Veterinary Journal 167: 181–185.Google Scholar
Ferris, W. and Bagnara, J.T. 1972. Reflecting pigment cells in the dove iris. In Riley, V. (ed.), Pigmentation: Its Genesis and Biological Control. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 181–192.Google Scholar
Ferrus, L., Génot, J.-C., Topin, F., Baudry, J. and Giraudoux, P. 2002. Répartition de la Chevêche d’Athéna (Athene noctua Scop.) et variation d ‘échelle d’analyse des paysages. Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 57: 39–51.Google Scholar
Festetics, A. 1952. Observations on the Barn Owl and Little Owl’s life habitats. Aquila 60: 452–453.Google Scholar
Festetics, A. 1959. Gewölluntersuchungen an Steinkauzen der Camargue. Terre et Vie 106: 121–127.Google Scholar
Fiedler, W. 2013. Unveröffentlichte Übersichten der Steinkauzbrutdaten 2006–2012. Radolfzell: Vogelwarte Radolfzell.Google Scholar
Finck, P. 1989. Variabilität des Territorialverhaltens beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschftlichen Fakultät der Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Finck, P. 1990. Seasonal variation of territory size with the Little Owl (Athene noctua). Oecologia 83: 68–75.Google Scholar
Finck, P. 1993. Territoriengrösse beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua): Einfluss der Dauer der Territorienbesetzung. Journal für Ornithologie 134: 35–42.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. and Dornbusch, G. 2010. Bestandssituation ausgewählter Brutvogelarten in Sachsen-Anhalt: Jahresbericht 2009. Ber. Landesamt Umweltsch. Sachsen-Anhalt, Sonderheft 1: 5–36.Google Scholar
Formon, A. 1969. Contribution à l’étude d’une population de Faucons pèlerins Falco peregrinus dans l’est de la France. Nos Oiseaux 30: 136.Google Scholar
Formozov, A.N. and Osmolovskaya, V.I. 1953. Chislennost nekotorykh landshaftnykh zhivotnykh tsentral’nogo Kazakhstana po dannym analiza dobychi, vylovlennoi khishchnymi ptitsami [Number of some landscape animals of the central Kazakhstan on the base of analysis of prey, caught by birds of prey]. Trudy Instituta geografii, AN. SSSR [Proceedings of Institute of Geography, Academy of Science of the U.S.S.R.] 54: 329–350.Google Scholar
Forsman, E.D., DeStefano, S., Raphael, M.G. and Gutiérrez, R.J. (eds.) 1996. Demography of the Northern Spotted Owl. Studies in Avian Biology No. 17. Camarillo, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society.Google Scholar
Framis, H. and Alonso, J. 2009. Winter nesting of Little Owl (Athene noctua) in Catalonia, northeastern Spain. Journal of Raptor Research 43: 170–171.Google Scholar
Framis, H., Baucells, J. and Holroyd, G.L. 2020. A case of partial leucism in a Little Owl Athene noctua in Catalonia, NE Spain. Revista Catalana d’Ornitologia 36: 83–87.Google Scholar
Frankel, O.H. and Soule, M.E. 1981. Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, A.B., Gutierrez, R.J., Nichols, J.D., et al. 2004. Population Dymamics of the California Spotted Owl (Strix Occidentalis Occidentalis): A Meta-Analysis. Ornithological Monographs No. 54. Washington, D. C.: American Ornithologists’ Union.Google Scholar
Freyer, H. 1842. Fauna der in Krain bekannten Säugethiere, Vögel, Reptilien und Fische. Ljubljana: Eger’schen Gubernial.Google Scholar
Frolov, V.V., Korkina, S.A., Frolov, A.V., et al. 2001. Analiz sostoyaniya fauny nevorob’inykh ptits yuga lesostepnoi zony pravoberezhnogo Povolzh’ya v XX veke [Analysis of the state of fauna of non-passerine birds in south of the forest-steppe zone of the Right-bank Volga region in XX century]. Berkut 10: 156–183.Google Scholar
Fronczak, J. and Dombrowski, A. 1991. Owls (Strigiformes) in the agricultural and forest landscapes of South Bialystok Lowlands. Acta Ornitholecologica 26: 55–61.Google Scholar
Fuchs, P. 1986. Structure and functioning of a Little Owl Athene noctua population. Annual Report Research Institute for Nature Management 1985, 113–126.Google Scholar
Fuchs, P. and Thissen, J.B.M. 1981. Die Pestizid-und PCB-Belastung bei Greifvögeln und Eulen in den Niederlanden nach gesetzlich verordneten Einschränkungen im Gebrauch der Chlorierten Kohlenwasserstoffpestizide. Ökologie der Vögel 3: 189–195.Google Scholar
Fuchs, P. and Van De Laar, J.A.J. 2010. Steenuilen in een veranderend landschap. De Levende Natuur 111: 198–204.Google Scholar
Fuller, M.R. and Mosher, J.A. 1981. Methods of detecting and counting raptors: a review. In Ralph, , C.J. and Scott, , J.M. (eds.), Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds. Studies in Avian Biology 6. Camarillo, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society, 235–246.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.J., Trevelyan, R.J. and Hudson, R.W., 1997. Landscape composition models for breeding bird populations in lowland English farmland over a 20 year period. Ecography 20: 295–307.Google Scholar
Furrington, H. 1979. Nisthilfe für Steinkäuze: Eine Röhre schützt vor dem Marder. Wir und die Vögel 11: 20–22.Google Scholar
Furrington, H. 1998. 27 Jahre Steinkauz-Schutz im Stadt-und Landkreis Heilbronn mit Randgebieten auf einer Kontrollfläche von ca. 750 km². Ornithologische Schnellmitteilungen Baden-Württemberg 59: 14–16.Google Scholar
Gaffney, M.F. and Hodos, W. 2003. The visual activity and refractive state of the American kestrel (Falco sparverius). Vision Research 43: 2053–2059.Google Scholar
Gaines, W.L., Harrod, R.J. and Lehmkuhl, J.F. 1999. Monitoring Biodiversity: Quantification and Interpretation. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-443. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.Google Scholar
Galeotti, P. 1989. Tavola rotonda: metodi di censimento per gli strigiformi. In Fasola, M. (ed.), Atti II Seminario Italiano Censimenti Faunistici dei Vertebrati. Supplemento alle Ricerche di Biologia della Selvaggina 16: 437–445.Google Scholar
Galeotti, P. and Morimando, F. 1991. Dati preliminari sul censimento della Civetta in ambiente urbano. Supplemento alle Ricerche di Biologia della Selvaggina 16: 349–351.Google Scholar
Galeotti, P. and Sacchi, R. 1996. Owl census project in the Lombardy region: preliminary data on the Tawny Owl (Strix aluco), the Little Owl (Athene noctua) and the Long-eared Owl (Asio otus), populations. In Abstracts II International Conference on Raptors. Urbino: Raptor Research Foundation e Università di Urbino, 79–80.Google Scholar
Gallego, A., Baron, M. and Gayoso, M. 1975. Horizontal cells of the avian retina Vision Research 15: 1029–1030.Google Scholar
Ganey, J.L. and Block, W.M. 2005. Winter Movements and Range Use of Radio-marked Mexican Spotted Owls: An Evaluation of Current Management Recommendations. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-148-WWW. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.Google Scholar
Ganey, J.L., White, G.C., Bowden, D.C. and Franklin, A.B. 2004 . Evaluating methods for monitoring populations of Mexican Spotted Owls: a case study. In Thompson, W.L. (ed.), Sampling Rare or Elusive Species: Concepts Designs, and Techniques for Estimating Population Parameters. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 337–385.Google Scholar
Ganguli-Lachungpa, U., Rahmani, A.R. and Islam, M.Z. 2011. Eleven priority areas for conservation: important birds areas of Sikkim. In Arrawatia, M.L. and Tambe, S. (eds.), Biodiversity of Sikkim: Exploring and Conserving a Global Hotspot. Gangtok: Information and Public Relations Department Government of Sikkim, 281–302.Google Scholar
Ganya, I.M. and Zubkov, N.I. 1975. Pitanie domovogo sycha (Athene noctua Scop.) in srednei chasti Moldavii [The Little Owl (Athene noctua Scop.) feeding at the middle part of Moldavia]. In Ekologiya Ptits im Mlekopitayushchikh Moldavii [Ecology of Birds and Mammals of Moldavia]. Kishinev: Shiintsa Press, 63–72.Google Scholar
Garcia, J.B. and Munoz, R. 2003. Mochuelo Europeo. In Martí, R. and Moral, J.C. (eds.), Atlas de las Aves Reproductoras de España. Madrid: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-Sociedad Española de Ornitología, 318–319.Google Scholar
García-Fernández, A.J., Motas-Guzman, M., Navas, I., et al. 1997. Environmental exposure and distribution of lead in four species of raptors in southeastern Spain. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 33: 76–82.Google Scholar
García-Fernández, A.J., Sanchez-Garcia, J.A., Gomez-Zapata, M., and Luna, A. 1996. Distribution of cadmium in blood and tissues of wild birds. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 30: 252–258.Google Scholar
García-Fernández, A.J., Sanchez-Garcia, J.A, Jimenez-Montalban, P. and Luna, A. 1995. Lead and cadmium in wild birds in Southeastern Spain. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14: 2049–2058.Google Scholar
Gassmann, H. and Bäumer, B. 1993. Zur Populationsökologie des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in der westlichen Jülicher Börde. Erste Ergebnisse einer 15jährigen. Studie Die Vogelwarte 37: 130–143.Google Scholar
Gassmann, H., Bäumer, B. and Glasner, W. 1994. Faktoren der Steuerung des Bruterfolges beim Steinkauz Athene noctua. Vogelwelt 115: 5–13.Google Scholar
Gates, J.E. and Giffen, N.R., 1991. Neotropical migrant birds and edge effects at a forest-stream ecotone. Wilson Bulletin 103: 204–217.Google Scholar
Gavrilov, E.I. 1999. Fauna i Rasprostranenie Ptits Kazakhstana [Fauna and Distribution of the Birds of Kazakhstan]. Almaty: Publishing House of Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR [In Russian].Google Scholar
Gavrin, V.F. 1962. Otryad Sovy Striges. In Ptitsy Kazakhstana [Birds of Kazakhstan]. Vol. 2. Almaty: Arend Wassink, 708–779.Google Scholar
Gedeon, K., Grüneberg, C., Mitschke, A., et al. 2014. Atlas Deutscher Brutvogelarten [Atlas of German Breeding Birds]. Münster: Stiftung Vogelmonitoring Deutschland und Dachverband Deutscher Avifaunisten.Google Scholar
Geister, I. 1995. Ornitološki atlas Slovenije. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. 1990a. Habitat et sites de nidification de la Chouette chevêche, Athene noctua SCOP., en bordure des Vosges du Nord. Ciconia 14: 85–116.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. 1990b. La Chouette chevêche en France: constat d’une régression. L’Oiseau Magazine 18: 22–27.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. 1990c. Régression de la Chouette chevêche, Athene noctua SCOP., en bordure des Vosges du Nord. Ciconia 14: 65–84.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. 1991. Mortalité de la Chouette chevêche, Athene noctua, en France. In Juillard, M., Bassin, P., Baudvin, H., et al. (eds.), Rapaces Nocturnes Actes du 30e Colloque Interrégional d’Ornithologie Porrentruy (Suisse), 2–4 Novembre 1990. Bern: Nos Oiseaux, 139–148.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. 1992a. Bilan de l’enquête Chouette chevêche du C.E.O.A. Cigogneau 34: 19–21.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. 1992b. Biologie de reproduction de la Chouette chevêche Athene noctua SCOP., en bordure des Vosges du Nord. Ciconia 16: 1–18.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. 1992c. Contribution à l’écologie de la Chouette Chevêche, Athene noctua (Scop.), en France. Thèse. Université de Dijon.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. 1999. In Rocamora, G. and Yeatman-Berthelot, D. (eds.), Oiseaux Menacés et à Surveiller en France. Paris: Société d’Etudes Ornithologiques de France, Ligue pour le Protection des Oiseaux, 302–303.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. 2001. In Génot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), Etat des connaissances sur la Chevêche d’Athéna, Athene noctua, en bordure des Vosges du Nord (Nord-Est de la France) de 1984 à 2000. Ciconia 25: 109–118.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. 2005. La Chevêche d’Athéna, Athene noctua, dans la Réserve de la Biosphère des Vosges du Nord de 1984 à 2004. Ciconia 29: 1–272.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. and Bersuder, D. 1995. Le régime alimentaire de la Chouette chevêche, Athene noctua, en Alsace-Lorraine. Ciconia 19: 35–51.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. and Lecomte, P. 1998. Essai de synthèse sur la population de Chevêche d’Athéna Athene noctua en France. Ornithos 5: 124–131.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. and Lecomte, P. 2002. La Chevêche d’Athéna. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. and Sturm, F. 2001. Biologie de reproduction de la Chevêche d’Athéna (Athene noctua) en captivité. Ciconia 25: 219–230.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. and Sturm, F. 2003. Bilan de l’expérience de renforcement des populations de Chevêche d’Athéna Athene noctua dans le Parc naturel régional des Vosges du Nord. Alauda 71: 175–178.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. and Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. 2002. Athene noctua Little Owl. BWP Update 4: 35–63.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C. and Wilhelm, J.-L. 1993. Occupation et utilisation de l’espace par la Chouette chevêche, Athene noctua, en bordure des Vosges du Nord. Alauda 61: 181–194.Google Scholar
Génot, J.-C., Sturm, F., Pfitzinger, H., et al. 2000. Expérience de renforcement des populations de Chevêche d’Athéna (Athene noctua Scop.) dans la Réserve de Biosphère des Vosges du Nord. Annales Scientifiques de la Réserve de Biosphère Transfrontalière Vosges du Nord-Pfälzerwald 8: 31–51.Google Scholar
Géroudet, P. 1964. L’hiver rigoureux de 1962–1963 en Suisse romande. Nos Oiseaux 27: 222.Google Scholar
Gesner, C. 1555. Historiae Animalivm, Liber III. Froschovervm: Tigvri apvd Christoph.Google Scholar
Ghenam, K. and Si Bachir, A. 2011. Approche biométrique et calorimétrique de quelques ordres d’insectes (Coleoptera, Orthoptera, Dermaptera et Hymenoptera) de la région de Batna (Algérie) [Biometric and Calorimetric Approach of Some Insect Orders (Coleoptera, Orthoptera, Dermaptera and Hymenoptera) in the Region of Batna (Algeria)]. In Proceedings of SIBFA Conference. Ouargla, Algeria: Ouargla University, 150–156.Google Scholar
Gibbons, D.W., Avery, M.I. and Brown, A.F. 1996. Population trends of breeding birds in the United Kingdom since 1800. British Birds 89: 291–305.Google Scholar
Gill, F., Donsker, D. and Rasmussen, P. (eds.) 2021. IOC World Bird List (v11.2). www.worldbirdnames.org/new/ioc-lists/master-list-2/ (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Gimbutas, M. 1989. The Language of the Goddess. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Glue, D.E. 1971a. Ringing recovery circumstances of small birds of prey. Bird Study 18: 137–146.Google Scholar
Glue, D.E. 1971b. Avian predator pellet analysis and the mammologist. Mammal Review 1: 56–57.Google Scholar
Glue, D.E. 1972. Bird prey taken by British owls. Bird Study 19: 91–95.Google Scholar
Glue, D.E. 1973. Seasonal mortality in four small birds of prey. Ornis Scandinavica 4: 97–102.Google Scholar
Glue, D.E. 2002. Little Owl Athene noctua. In Wernham, C.V., Toms, M.P., Marchant, H., et al. (eds.), The Migration Atlas: Movements of the Birds of Britain and Ireland. London: T. and A.D. Poyser, 429–431.Google Scholar
Glue, D.E. and Scott, D. 1980. Breeding biology of the Little Owl. British Birds 73: 167–180.Google Scholar
Glutz Von Blotzheim, U.N. 1962. Die Brutvögel der Schweiz. Aarau: Verlag Aargauer Tagblatt A.G., 319–321.Google Scholar
Glutz Von Blotzheim, U.N. and Bauer, K.M. 1980. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Bd 9. Wiesbaden: Akademie Verlagsges, 501–530.Google Scholar
Goddard, E.H. 1917. Little Owl in Wiltshire. The Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 39: 403.Google Scholar
Golubeva, T.B., Chernyi, A.G. and Ilichev, V.D. 1970. Effect of parameters of acoustic stimulation on responses of the auditory nerve in the owls Asio otus and Athene noctua. Neuroscience Translations 4: 50–59.Google Scholar
Gomes, A.C.R., Silva, R. and Cardoso, G.C. 2018. Plumage pigmentation patterns of diurnal raptors in relation to colour ornamentation and ecology. Journal of Ornithology 159: 793–804.Google Scholar
Gomes, L., Grilo, C., Silva, C. and Mira, A. 2009. Identification methods and deterministic factors of owl roadkill hotspot locations in Mediterranean landscapes. Ecological Research 24: 355–370.Google Scholar
Gompertz, B. 1825. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 115: 513–585.Google Scholar
Gooch, G.B. 1940. The bill-snapping of a Little Owl. British Birds 33: 316.Google Scholar
Gorman, G. 1995. The status of owls (Strigiformes) in Hungary. Buteo 7: 95–108.Google Scholar
Goszczynski, J. 1981. Comparative analysis of food of owls in agrocenoses. Ekologia Polska [Polish Journal of Ecology] 29: 431–439.Google Scholar
Gotta, A. and Pigozzi, G. 1997. Trophic niche of the barn owl and little owl in a rice field habitat in northen Italy. Italian Journal of Zoology 64: 55–59.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, T.K., Ekschmitt, K. and Wolters, V. 2011. Efficient placement of nest boxes for the Little Owl (Athene noctua). Journal of Raptor Research 45: 1–14.Google Scholar
Gould, E., Gould, J. and Lear, E. 1837. The Birds of Europe. Vol. 1. London: R. and J.E. Taylor.Google Scholar
Graubitz, G. 1983. Domovyi sych [Little Owl]. In Ptitsy Latvii: Territorialnoe Razmeshchenie i Chislennost [Birds of Latvia: Territorial Distribution and Number]. Riga: Zinatne, 122–123.Google Scholar
Gregory, T.C. 1944. Little Owl hovering. British Birds 38: 55–56.Google Scholar
Grell, M.B., Jørgensen, H.E., Meltofte, H. and Skov, H. 1998. Fugle-nes Danmark: De Danske Fugles Udbredelse, Tæthed, Bestands-Forhold og Udviklingstendenser 1971–1996 Baseret På Resulta-Terne af Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Landsdækkende Kort-Lægning i 1993–96. Copenhagen: Gads Forlag.Google Scholar
Grilo, C., Revilla, E., Reto, D., Filipe, J. and Ascensão, F. 2014. Understanding the mechanisms behind road effects: linking occurrence with road mortality in owls. Animal Conservation 17: 555–564.Google Scholar
Grimm, H. 1986. Zur Strukturierung zweier Graslandhabitate und deren potentielles Nahrungsangebot für den Steinkauz (Athene noctua) in Thüringer Becken. Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz in Thüringen 22: 94–104.Google Scholar
Grimm, H. 1989. Die Erhaltung und Pflege von Streuobstwiesen unter dem Aspekt des Steinkauzschutzes (Athene noctua). Abhandlungen und Berichte des Museums der Natur Gotha 15: 103–107.Google Scholar
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. 1999. Birds of India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. 2011. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Helm Field Guides. London: Christopher Helm.Google Scholar
Grinschgl, F. 2021. Artenschutzprojekt für gefährdete Vogelarten in NÖ 2018–2020. Modul 2: Steinkauz. Endbericht 2020. Projektbericht im Auftrag des Amtes der NÖ Landesregierung, Abteilung Naturschutz. Vienna: Abteilung Naturschutz.Google Scholar
Grishanov, G.V. 1994. Gnezdyashchiesya ptitsy Kaliningradskoi oblasti: territorialnoe razmeshchenie i dinamikachislennosti v XIX–XX vv. I. Non-Passeriforms [Breeding birds of Kaliningrad Region: territorial distribution and dynamics of number in XIX–XXth century. I. Non-Passeriformes]. Russkiy Ornitologicheskiy Zhurnal [Russian Journal of Ornithology] 3: 83–116.Google Scholar
Groen, N., Boudewijn, T. and De Jonge, J. 2000. De effecten van overstroming van de uiterwaarden op de Steenuil. De Levende Natuur 101: 143–148.Google Scholar
Groen, N., Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2001. In Génot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), Effects of pollution on birds in river ecosystems: a case study on the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the Netherlands. Ciconia 25: 141–146.Google Scholar
Grooters, H. and Grooters, S. 2006. Steenuilen rond Neede. Athene Nieuwsbrief 11: 35–41.Google Scholar
Grosse, A. and Transehe, N. 1929. Austrumbaltijas Mugurkaulaino Saraktis. Riga: Komisijā pie J. Deubner.Google Scholar
Grüebler, M. and Apolloni, N. 2018. Steinkauz. In Knaus, P., Antoniazza, S., Wechsler, S., et al. (eds.), Schweizer Brutvogelatlas 2013–2016: Verbreitung und Bestandsentwicklung der Vögel in der Schweiz und im Fürstentum Liechtenstein. Sempach: Schweizerische Vogelwarte, 238–239.Google Scholar
Grüebler, M.U., Schaller, S., Keil, H. and Naef-Daenzer, B. 2013. The occurrence of cavities in fruit trees: effects of tree age and management on biodiversity in traditional European orchards. Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 3233–3246.Google Scholar
Grüebler, M.U., Widmer, S., Korner-Nievergelt, F., Naef-Daenzer, B. 2014. Temperature characteristics of winter roost-sites for birds and mammals: tree cavities and anthropogenic alternatives. International Journal of Biometeorology 58: 629–637.Google Scholar
Grzywaczewski, G. 2006. Stan populacji pójdzki Athene noctua w Polsce [State of the population of the little owl Athene noctua in Poland]. Notatki Ornitologiczne 47: 147–158.Google Scholar
Grzywaczewski, G. 2009. Home range size and habitat use of the Little Owl Athene noctua in East Poland. In Johnson, D.H., Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. and Duncan, J.R. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth World Owl Conference, Oct–Nov 2007, Groningen, The Netherlands. Ardea 97: 541–545.Google Scholar
Grzywaczewski, G. and Kitowski, I. 2000. Owls (Strigiformes) in cities of the Lublin Region (SE Poland). In Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls, Czech Society for Ornithology, Mikulov, 24-26.11.2000. Prague: Czech Society for Ornithology, 22–23.Google Scholar
Grzywaczewski, G., Kitowski, I. and Scibior, R. 2006. Diet of little owl Athene noctua during breeding in the central part of Lublin region (SE Poland). Acta Zoologica Sinica 52: 1155–1161.Google Scholar
GTAN-SPEA 2021. Relatório do Programa NOCTUA Portugal (2009/10–2019/20). Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves, Lisboa. Unpublished report available at www.spea.pt (accessed March 2023).Google Scholar
Gubin, B.M. 1998. Gnezdyashchiesya ptitsy vostochnoi kromki peskov Kyzylkum [Breeding birds of eastern edge of Kyzylkum sands]. Russkiy Ornitologicheskiy Zhurnal [Russian Journal of Ornithology] 50 (Express issue): 3–23.Google Scholar
Guermeur, Y. and Monnat, J.Y. 1980. Histoire et Géographie des Oiseaux Nicheurs de Bretagne. Clermont-Ferrand: S.E.P.N.B. Centrale Ornithologique Ar Vran, Ministère de l’Environnement et du cadre de Vie, Direction de la Protection de la Nature, A.R.P.E.G.E., 103–104.Google Scholar
Guerra, C., Bover, P. and Alcover, J.A. 2012. A new species of extinct Little Owl from the Pleistocene of Mallorca (Balearic Islands). Journal of Ornithology 153: 347–354.Google Scholar
Gunston, D. 1948. Little Owl as prey of Tawny Owl. British Birds 41: 388.Google Scholar
Güntürkün, O. 2000. Sensory physiology: vision. In Whittow, G.C. (ed.), Sturke’s Avian Physiology, fifth edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1–19.Google Scholar
Gusev, V.M. 1952. O znachenii glubiny snezhnogo pokrova dlya ptits, pitayushchikhsya myshevidnymi gryzunami [On the significance of the snow cover depth for birds, feeding on mouse-like rodents]. Zoologicheskij Zhurnal [Zoological Journal] 31: 471–473 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Gushcha, G.I. 1982. Ornithogastia Vercammen-Grandjean, 1960, Stat. N. (Acariformes, Trombiculidae) sopisaniem novogo vida Ukrainy [Ornithogastia Vercammen-Grandjean, 1960, Stat. N. (Acariformes, Trombiculidae) with descriptions of new species of Ukraine]. Vestnik Zoologii [Bulletin of Zoology] 4: 20–25 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Gustin, M., Brambilla, M. and Celada, C. 2016. Stato di conservazione e valore di riferimento favorevole per le popolazioni di uccelli nidificanti in Italia. Rivista Italiana di Ornitologia [Research in Ornithology] 86: 3–36.Google Scholar
Gyllin, R. 1968. Ryttling som jaktmethod hos minervauggla (Athene noctua) (Hovering as hunting method of Little Owl Athene noctua). Var Fagelvarld 27: 172–173.Google Scholar
Haase, P. 1993. Zur Situation und Brutbiologie des Steinkauzes Athene n. noctua SCOP., 1769 im Westhaveland. Naturschutz und Landschatspflege in Brandenburg 2: 29–37.Google Scholar
Haase, P. 2001. Steinkauz – Athene noctua (Scopoli 1769). In Arbeitsgemeinschaft Berlin-Brandenburgischer Ornithologen (Hrsg.), Die Vogelwelt von Brandenburg und Berlin. Rangsdorf: Natur and Text, 2–385.Google Scholar
Habel, J.C., Braun, J., Fischer, C., Weisser, W.W. and Gossner, M.M. 2015. Population restoration of the nocturnal bird Athene noctua in Western Europe: an example of evidence based species conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 24: 1743–1753.Google Scholar
Hahn, E. 1984. Welche der Mitteleuropäischen Eulenarten Eignet sich als Biomonitor? Diplomarbeit Universität des Saarlandes, Saabrücken.Google Scholar
Haller, W. 1951. Zur “kiewitt”-Frage (Steinkauz oder Waldkauz?). Ornithologische Mitteilungen 3: 199–201.Google Scholar
Hallmann, C., Schekkerman, H., Stroeken, P. and Van Harxen, R. 2011. Conditie-index voor Jonge Steenuilen. SOVON-notitie 2011-104. Nijmegen: SOVON Vogelonderzoek Nederland.Google Scholar
Hameau, O. and Millon, A. 2022. Biologie de reproduction de la Chevêche d’Athéna Athene noctua en Provence. Ornithos 29(3): 137–153.Google Scholar
Hámori, D. 2019. Conservation Biological Studies on the Little Owl Athene noctua (Scopoli, 1769) in the Kiskunság. Theses of doctoral (Ph.D.) dissertation, University of Sopron.Google Scholar
Hámori, D. and Csortos, C. 2016. A Kuvik Munkacsoport 2016 évi beszámolója. Heliaca 14: 14–18.Google Scholar
Hámori, D. and Csortos, C. 2017. A Kuvik Munkacsoport 2016 évi beszámolója [2016 report on conservation activities and results – Little Owl Working Group]. Heliaca 13: 15–17.Google Scholar
Hámori, D., Winkler, D. and Cserkész, T. 2019. Little Owl’s (Athene noctua) vertebrate food composition in breeding season with high frog dominance in grasslands. Ornis Hungarica 27: 44–61.Google Scholar
Handrinos, G. and Akriotis, T. 1997. The Birds of Greece. London: Christopher Helm.Google Scholar
Hansen, W., Synnatzschke, J. and Oelke, H. 1988. Bestimmungsbuch für Rupfungen und Mauserfedern. Beiträge zur Naturkunde Niedersachsen 41: 371–373.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, D.E. 1973. X-ray photographs of Little Owl pellets. British Birds 66: 33.Google Scholar
Harbodt, A. and Pauritsch, G. 1987. Lebensraum Streuobstwiese. Programme und gesetzliche Schutzmöglichkeiten. In: Keil, W. (ed.), Staatliche Vogelschutzwarte für Hessen, Rheinland-Pfalz und Saarland. Festschrift. Gießen: Institut für Angewandte Vogelkunde, 81–91.Google Scholar
Hardouin, L. 2002. Communication Acoustique et Reconnaissance Individuelle chez la Chevêche d’Athéna. Strasbourg: CEPE, CNRS, Université Louis Pasteur, DEA.Google Scholar
Hardouin, L. 2006. Communication Acoustique et Territorialité chez les Rapaces Nocturnes. Strasbourg : Université Louis Pasteur.Google Scholar
Hardouin, L.A., Robert, D. and Bretagnolles, V. 2008. A dusk chorus effect in a nocturnal bird: support for mate and rival assessment functions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62: 1909–1918.Google Scholar
Hardouin, L.A., Tabel, P. and Bretagnolles, V. 2006. Neighbour-stranger discrimination in the little owl, Athene noctua. Animal Behaviour 72: 105–112.Google Scholar
Hartert, E. 1913. Die Vögel der Paläarktischen Fauna: Systematisch Übersicht der in Europa, Nord Asien und der Mittelmeerregion vorkommende Vögel. Berlin: Friedländer und Sohn, 999–1006.Google Scholar
Hartert, E. 1924. Ornithological results of Captain Buchanan’s second Sahara expedition. Novitates Zoologicae 31: 18.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Müller, B. 1973. Beitrag zur Mauser des Steinkauzes, Athene noctua (Scop.). I. Der Handflügel. Philippia Abhandlungen Berichte Naturkunde Museum Kassel 1: 286–295.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Müller, B. 1974. Beitrag zur Mauser des Steinkauzes, Athene noctua (Scop.). II. Armflügel und Schwanzfedern. Philippia Abhandlungen Berichte Naturkunde Museum Kassel 2: 182–184.Google Scholar
Haverschmidt, F. 1939. Beobachtungen über die Begattung beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Beiträge zur Fortpflanzungsbiologie der Vögel 15: 236–239.Google Scholar
Haverschmidt, F. 1946. Observations on the breeding habits of the Little Owl. Ardea 34: 214–246.Google Scholar
Heim De Balsac, H. and Mayaud, N. 1962. Oiseaux du Nord-Est de l’Afrique. Paris: Lechevalier, 184–185.Google Scholar
Heinroth, O. and Heinroth, M. 1926. Die Vögel Mitteleuropas. Berlin: Hugo Bermühler Verlag, 15–17.Google Scholar
Helbig, A. 1981. Auswirkungen des strengen Winters 1978–79 auf die Vogelwelt in Westfalen. Charadrius 17: 82–103.Google Scholar
Henrichs, T. and Fischer, R. 2006. Steinkauzvorkommen (Athene noctua) in den Streuobstwiesen bei Holzheim/EMS, TK 5614.1. Pflanzen und Tiere in Rheinland-Pfalz 16: 178–179.Google Scholar
Henrioux, P. 1980. Nidification simultanée de l’Etourneau et de la Chouette chevêche dans le même nichoir. Nos Oiseaux 35: 343.Google Scholar
Hensley, R.C. and Smith, K.G. 1986. Eastern bluebird responses to nocturnal black rat snake nest predation. Wilson Bulletin 98: 602–603.Google Scholar
Hernandez, M. 1988. Road mortality of the Little Owl Athene noctua in Spain. Journal of Raptor Research 22: 81–84.Google Scholar
Herrera, C.M. and Hiraldo, F. 1976. Food-niche and trophic relationships among European owls. Ornis Scandinavica 7: 29–41.Google Scholar
Hessels, M. and Van Harxen, R. 2020. Daar zitten toch geen Steenuilen? Bosuilen en Steenuilen in het werkgebied de Vogelwerkgroep Zuidoost-Achterhoek. Uilen 10: 16–27.Google Scholar
Hessische Gesellschaft Für Ornithologie Und Naturschutz 2010. Vögel in Hessen: Die Brutvögel Hessens in Raum und Zeit. Brutvogelatlas. Echzell: Hessische Gesellschaft Für Ornithologie Und Naturschutz.Google Scholar
Hewson, R. 1972. Changes in the number of stoats, rats and Little Owl in Yorkshire as shown by tunnel trapping. Journal of Zoology 168: 427–429.Google Scholar
Hibbert-Ware, A. 1938a. Report of the Little Owl Food Inquiry 1936–37. British Birds 31: 249–264.Google Scholar
Hibbert-Ware, A. 1938b. The food habits of the Little Owl (Carine noctua vidalii). Annals of Applied Biology 25: 218–220.Google Scholar
Hill, G.E. 1991. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350: 337.Google Scholar
Hinsley, S.A. and Bellamy, E. 2000. The influence of hedge structure, management and landscape context on the value of hedgerows to birds: a review. Journal of Environmental Management 60: 33–49.Google Scholar
Hochachka, W. and Smith, J.N.M. 1991. Determinants and consequences of nestling condition in song sparrows. Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 995–1008.Google Scholar
Hole, D.G., Willis, S.G., Pain, D.J., et al. 2009. Projected impacts of climate change on a continentwide protected area network. Ecology Letters 12: 420–431.Google Scholar
Holmgren, V.C. 1988. Owls in Folklore and Natural History. Santa Barbara, CA: Capra Press.Google Scholar
Holsegård-Rasmussen, M.H., Sunde, P., Thorup, K., et al. 2009. Variation in working effort in Danish Little Owls Athene noctua. In Johnson, D.H., Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. and Duncan, J.R. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth World Owl Conference, Oct–Nov 2007, Groningen, The Netherlands. Ardea 97: 547–554.Google Scholar
Holt, D.W., Berkley, R., Deppe, C., et al. 2019. Little Owl (Athene noctua). In Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D.A. and de Juana, E. (eds.), Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.Google Scholar
Holt, D.W., Deppe, C., Enriquez-Rocha, P.L., et al. 1999. Strigidae species account. In Elliot, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D. and de Juana, E. (eds.) Handbook of Birds of the World. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, 153–242.Google Scholar
Hölzinger, J. 2001. Athene noctua (Scopoli, 1769) Steinkauz. In Hölzinger, J. and Mahler, U. (eds.), Die Vögel Baden-Württembergs. Band 2.3 Nicht-Singvögel 3. Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer, 195–211.Google Scholar
Hölzinger, J., Bauer, H.-G., Berthold, P. Boschert, M. and Mahler, U. 2007. Rote Liste und kommentiertes Verzeichnis der Brutvogelarten Baden-Württembergs, 5. Fassung. Stand 31.12.2004. Karlsruhe: Landesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar
Hounsome, T., O’mahony, D. and Delahay, R. 2004. The diet of Little Owls Athene noctua in Gloucestershire, England. Bird Study 51: 282–284.Google Scholar
Hubl, H. 1952. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Vorhaltensweisen junger Eulenvögel in Gefangenschaft: (Schleiereule, Tyto alba , Steinkauz, Athene noctua und Waldkauz, Strix aluco). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 9: 102–119.Google Scholar
Hudson, W.E. (ed.) 1991. Landscape Linkages and Biodiversity: Defenders of Wildlife. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Hulten, M. 1955. Gewöllenuntersuchungen. Regulus 35: 45.Google Scholar
Hulten, M. and Wassenich, V. 1961. Die Vogelfauna Luxemburgs. 2. Teil Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes Luxembourgeois 66: 446–447.Google Scholar
Iankov, P. 1983. The Ornithofauna of Sofia, its Structure and Formation Characteristics. PhD thesis. University of Minsk [In Russian].Google Scholar
Iankov, P. 2007. Atlas of Breeding Birds in Bulgaria. Sofia: Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds.Google Scholar
Ignatov, A. 1993. Distribution and Status of Little Owl (Athene noctua, Brehm, 1855) in Bulgaria. Thesis. Sofia University.Google Scholar
Ignatov, A. (in press) Modelling the distribution of the Little Owl Athene noctua in Bulgaria. Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Ignatov, A. and Popgeorgiev, G. 2021. Recent and historical distribution of Little Owl (Athene noctua) in Bulgaria. In Roque, I., Duncan, J.R., Johnson, D.H. and Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 World Owl Conference, Evora, Portugal. Vol. 29. Lisbon: Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves, 216–222.Google Scholar
Ilanloo, S.S., Ebrahimi, E., Valizadegan, N., et al. 2020. Little owl (Athene noctua) around human settlements and agricultural lands: conservation and management enlightenments. Acta Ecologica Sinica 40: 347–352.Google Scholar
Ille, R. 1983. Ontogenese des Beutefangverhaltens beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Journal für Ornithologie 124: 133–146.Google Scholar
Ille, R. 1992. Zur Biologie und Ökologie des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) im Marchfeld: Aktuelle Situation und mögliche Schutzmassnahmen. Egretta 35: 49–57.Google Scholar
Ille, R. 1996. Zur Biologie und Ökologie zweier Steinkauzpopulationen in Österreich. Abhandlungen Der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Österreich 129: 17–31.Google Scholar
Ille, R. and Grinschgl, F. 2001. In Génot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), Little Owl (Athene noctua) in Austria: habitat characteristics and population density. Ciconia 25: 129–140.Google Scholar
Ille, R. and Grinschgl, F. 2014. Sicherung und Entwicklung des gemeinsamen Lebensraumes von Steinkauz und Blutspecht in Niederösterreich unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Besiedlung in den Kellergassen. Unveröffentl Endbericht im Auftrag der NÖ Landesregierung, Abteilung Naturschutz. RU5-S-946/001-2011.Google Scholar
Ille, R. and Grinschgl, F. 2017. Überprüfung der Nutzung der im Rahmen des Artenschutzprojekts Steinkauz’ im Nordburgenland 2011 angebotenen Nistkästen sowie Verbesserung des Nistplatzangebots durch Anbringen weiterer Nistkästen. Bericht 2017. Im Auftrag des Amtes der Bergunland. Eisenstadt: Landesregierung Abteilung 5.Google Scholar
Illner, H. 1979. Erfahrungsbericht über Steinkauzbruten in Niströhren. D.B.V. AG zum Schutz bedrohter Eulen Informationsblatt 9: 6.Google Scholar
Illner, H. 1981. Populationsentwicklung der Eulen (Strigiformes) auf einer Probefläche Mittelwestfalens 1974–1979 und bestandsbeeinflussende Faktoren, insbesondere anthropogener Art. Ökologie der Vögel 3: 301–310.Google Scholar
Illner, H. 1988. Langfristiger Rückgang von Schleiereule Tyto alba, Waldohreule Asio otus, Steinkauz Athene noctua und Waldkauz Strix aluco in der Agrarlandschaft Mittelwestfalens 1974–1986. Vogelwelt 109: 145–151.Google Scholar
Illner, H. 1990. Sind durch Nistkasten-Untersuchungen verlässliche Populationstrends zu ermitteln? Eine Fallstudie am Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Vogel und Umwelt 6: 47–57.Google Scholar
Illner, H. 1991. Influence d’un apport de nourriture suplémentaire sur biologie de reproduction de la Chouette chevêche, Athene noctua. In Juillard, M. (ed.), Rapaces Nocturnes: Actes du 30e Colloque Interrégional d’Ornithologie Porrentruy (Suisse): 2, 3 et 4 Novembre 1990. Prangins: Nos Oiseaux, 153–158.Google Scholar
Illner, H. 1992. Road deaths of Westphalian owls: methodological problems, influence of road type and possible effects on population levels. In Galbraith, C.A., Taylor, I.R. and Percival, S. (eds.), The Ecology and Conservation of European Owls: Proceedings of a Symposium Held at Edinburgh University. Peterborough: UK Nature Conservation. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 94–100.Google Scholar
Il’yukh, M.P. 2002. Gnezdovaya biologiya domogovo sycha Predkavkazie [Breeding biology of the Little Owl in Front-Caucasian area]. Ptitsy Yuzhnoi Rossii (Birds of south Russia) [Proceedings of the International Conference on Results and Prospects of Ornithology Development on the Northern Caucasus in the 21st Century devoted to the 20th Anniversary of the North Caucasian Ornithological Group, October 24–27 2002, Rostov-on-Don]. Proceedings 31: 113–118.Google Scholar
Ingendahl, D. and Tersteegen, H.-J. 1992. Bestand von Steinkauz und Schleiereule im Sudkreis Kleve (Unterer Mittelrhein): Ein Bericht der Eulenschutzgruppe Issum. D.B.V. AG zum Schutz bedrohter Eulen Informationsblatt 38: 11–13.Google Scholar
Isenmann, P. and Moali, A. 2000. Little Owl. In Les Oiseaux d’Algerie [The Birds of Algeria]. Paris: Societé d’Etudes Ornithologiques de France, 190–191.Google Scholar
Isenmann, P., Gaultier, T., El Hili, A., et al. 2005. Little Owl. In Oiseaux de Tunisie [Birds of Tunisia]. Paris: Societé d’Etudes Ornithologiques de France, 249.Google Scholar
Isenmann, P., Hering, J., Brehme, S., et al. 2016. Little Owl. In Oiseaux de Libye [Birds of Libya]. Paris: Societé d’Etudes Ornithologiques de France, 149–152.Google Scholar
Ishunin, G.I. 1965. Pitanie domovogo sycha v zapovednike Aral-Paigambar (Uzbekistan) [The Little Owl feeding in Aral-Paigambar Nature Reserve (Uzbekistan)]. Ornitologiya 7: 471–472.Google Scholar
Issa, N. and Muller, Y. 2015. Atlas des Oiseaux de France Métropolitaine: Nidification et présence hivernale. Paris: LPO/SEOF/MNHN, Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Ivanov, A.I. 1940. Birds of Tajikistan. Vol. 10. Zoology and Parasitology. Moscow-Leningrad: Public House of the Academy of Science of the USSR.Google Scholar
Ivanov, A.I. 1976. Katalog Ptits SSSR [Catalogue of the Birds of the USSR]. Leningrad: Nauka Press.Google Scholar
Jabłoński, P. 2019. Distribution and abundance of the Little Owl Athene noctua in the western part of the Mazovian Lowland in 2016–2018. Kulon 24: 1–7.Google Scholar
Jacob, J. and Hoerschelmann, H. 1984. Chemotaxonomische Untersuchungen an Eulen (Strigiformes). Funktionelle Biologie and Medizin 3: 56–61.Google Scholar
Jacob, J.-P., Dehem, C., Burnel, A., et al. 2010. Atlas des Oiseaux Nicheurs de Wallonie 2001–2007. Série “Faune-Flore-Habitats”, no. 5. Gembloux: Aves et Département de l’Etude du Milieu Naturel et Agricole.Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. 2003. Succes van het verplaatsen van eieren of jongen van Steenuilen. Athene Nieuswbrief STONE 8: 20–23.Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. 2008. Steenuilen in de Midden-Betuwe. Athene Nieuwsbrief 13: 70–71.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. 1974. Quantitative measurement of food selection. Oecologia 14, 413–417.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, L.B. 2006. Ynglebestanden af Kirkeugle Athene noctua i Vendsyssel og Himmerland 1981–2000 [The Little Owl in northern Jutland, Denmark]. Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift 100: 35–43.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, L.B., Chrenková, M., Sunde, P., Šálek, M. and Thorup, K. 2016. Effects of food provisioning and habitat management on spatial behaviour of Little Owls during the breeding season. Ornis Fennica 93: 121–129.Google Scholar
Jashemski, W.F. and Meyer, F.G. 2002. The Natural History of Pompeii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaspers, V., Covaci, A., Maervoet, J., et al. 2005. Brominated flame retardants and organochlorine pollutants in eggs of little owls (Athene noctua) from Belgium. Environmental Pollution 136: 81–88.Google Scholar
Jay, M. 1993. In Centre Ornithologique Du Gard, Oiseaux Nicheurs du Gard. Atlas biogéographique 1985–1993, 145.Google Scholar
Jenny, M., Zellweger-Fischer, J., Pfiffner, L., Birrer, S. and Graf, R. 2011. Leitfaden für die Anwendung des Punktesystems. Biodiversität auf Landwirtschaftesbetrieben im Projekt “Mit Vielfalt punkten.” Sempach and Frick, Switzerland: Swiss Ornithological Institute and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL).Google Scholar
Jermaczek, A., Czwalga, T., Jermaczek, D., et al. 1995. Birds of the Gorzów Wielkopolski Region. Faunistic monograph. Swiebodzin: Naturalists of the Gorzów Wielkopolski Region.Google Scholar
Jöbges, M. 2004. Steinkauz (Athene noctua). In: Gedeon, K., Mitschke, A. and Sudfeldt, C. (eds.), Brutvögel in Deutschland. Hohenstein-Ernstthal: Eigenverlag des Vereins Sächsischer Ornithologen e.V., 22–23.Google Scholar
Jöbges, M. and Franke, S. 2006. Vom Totensymbol zum Sympathieträger. Situation des Steinkauzes Athene noctua in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Charadrius 42: 164–177.Google Scholar
Johnson, D.H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65–71.Google Scholar
Johnson, D.H., Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. and Génot, J.-C. 2009. Survey protocol for the Little Owl Athene noctua. In Johnson, D.H., Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. and Duncan, J.R. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth World Owl Conerence, Oct–Nov 2007, Groningen, the Netherlands. Ardea 97: 403–412.Google Scholar
Joiris, C. and Delbecke, K. 1981. Rückstände chlororganischer Pestizide und PCBs in belgischen Greifvögeln. Ökologie der Vögel 3: 173–180.Google Scholar
Jongbloed, R., Traas, T.P. and Luttik, R. 1996. A probablistic model for deriving soil quality criteria based on secondary poisoning top predators. II. Calculations for dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and cadmium. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 34: 279–306.Google Scholar
Jonston, J. 1650. Historiae Naturalis de Auibvs. Libri VI. Francofvrti ad Moenvm: Matthaei Meriani.Google Scholar
Juillard, M. 1979. La croissance des jeunes Chouettes chevêches, Athene noctua, pendant leur séjour au nid. Nos Oiseaux 35: 113–124.Google Scholar
Juillard, M. 1980. Répartition, biotopes et sites de nidification de la Chouette chevêche, Athene noctua, en Suisse. Nos Oiseaux 35: 309–337.Google Scholar
Juillard, M. 1981. Nichoir pour Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua). Nos Oiseaux 36: 40–42.Google Scholar
Juillard, M. 1981a. Trois malformations anatomiques apparentes chez la Chouette chevêche, Athene noctua. Nos Oiseaux 36: 121–125.Google Scholar
Juillard, M. 1984. La Chouette Chevêche. Prangins: Nos Oiseaux.Google Scholar
Juillard, M. 1990. Le déclin de la Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua), en Suisse. In Colloque interrégional d’ornithologie et de mammalogie, Strasbourg 1989. Ciconia 14: 55–57.Google Scholar
Juillard, M. 1997. Les vergers de la Chouette. Pro Natura Magazine 5: 6–8.Google Scholar
Juillard, M., Baudvin, H., Bonnet, J. and Génot, J.-C. 1992. Habitat et sites de nidification de la Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua) sur le Causse Méjean (Lozère). Nos Oiseaux 41: 415–440.Google Scholar
Juillard, M., Baudvin, H., Bonnet, J., Génot, J.-C. and Teyssier, G. 1990. Sur la nidification en altitude de la Chouette chevêche, Athene noctua: Observations dans le Massif central (France). Nos Oiseaux 40: 267–276.Google Scholar
Juillard, M., Praz, J.-C., Etournaud, A. and Beaud, P. 1978. Données sur la contamination des rapaces de Suisse romande et de leurs oeufs par les biocides organochlorés, les PCB et les métaux lourds. Nos Oiseaux 34: 189–206.Google Scholar
Kämpfer, A. and Lederer, W. 1988. Dismigration des Steinkauzes Athene noctua in Mittelwestfalen. Vogelwelt 109: 155–164.Google Scholar
Kämpfer-Lauenstein, A. and Lederer, W. 1995. Bestandsentwicklung einer Steinkauzpopulation in Mittelwestfalen (1974–1994). Charadrius 4: 211–216.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Karubian, J., Lindsay, W.R., Schwabl, H. and Webster, M.S. 2011. Bill coloration, a flexible signal in a tropical passerine bird, is regulated by social environment and androgens. Animal Behaviour 81: 795–800.Google Scholar
Karyakin, I.V. 1998. Pernatye Khishchniki Ural’skogo Regiona [Birds of Prey and Owls of the Ural Region]. Perm: Centre for Field Research of the Ural Animal Conservation Union.Google Scholar
Karyakin, I.V. and Kozlov, A.A. 1999. Predvaritelínyikasdastr ptits Chelyabinskoi oblasti [Preliminary Register of Birds of the Chelyabinsk Region (Oblast)]. Novosibirsk: Manuscript Press, 221–223.Google Scholar
Kasparek, M. 1992. Die Vögel der Türkei: Eine Übersicht. Heidelberg: Kasparek Verlag.Google Scholar
Kasparek, M. and Bilgin, C.C. 1996. Aves. In Kence, A. and Bilgin, C.C. (eds.), Türkiye Omurgalılar Tür Listesi. Ankara: DPT Yayınları.Google Scholar
Kaup, J.J. 1859. Monograph of the Strigidae. Transactions of the Zoological Society London 4: 201–260.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, R.P. 2002. Conservation and management of large forest owls in southeastern Australia. In Newton, I., Kavanagh, R., Olsen, J. and Taylor, I. (eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Owls. Canberra: CSIRO, 201–219.Google Scholar
Kehrer, S. 1972. Der Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Stuttgart: D.B.V. Verlag.Google Scholar
Keil, H. 2001. Artenschutzprojekt Steinkauz im Kreis Ludwigsburg. In Eulen als Kulturfolger: Probleme und Chancen. Tagungsband zum 17. Treffen der Eulenfachleute in Baden-Württemberg 2001. Oberriexingen: FOGE e.V.Google Scholar
Kelber, A. and Lind, O. 2010. Limits of colour vision in dim light. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 30: 454–459.Google Scholar
Kelber, A., Vorobyev, M. and Osorio, D. 2003. Animal colour vision: behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biology Reviews 78: 81–118.Google Scholar
Keller, V., Herrando, S., Voříšek, P., et al. 2020. European Breeding Bird Atlas 2: Distribution, Abundance and Change. Barcelona: European Bird Census Council and Lynx Edicions.Google Scholar
Kendeigh, S.C. 1961. Energy of birds conserved by roosting in cavities. Wilson Bulletin 73: 140–147.Google Scholar
Kenward, R. 1987. Wildlife Radio Tagging: Equipment, Field Techniques and Data Analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keve, A. and Kohl, S. 1961. A new race of the Little Owl from Transylvania. Bulletin of the British Ornithological Club 81: 51–52.Google Scholar
Khokhlov, A.N. 1992. Osobennosti Ekologii sov Vantropogennykh Landshaftakh Tsentral’nogo Predkavkz’ya [Ecological Characters of Owls in the Anthropogenic Landscapes of the Central Pre-Caucasus]. Sovremennatya Ornitologiya 1991 [Modern Ornithology 1991]. Moscow: Nauka, 85–95.Google Scholar
Khokhlov, A.N. 1995. Ornitologicheskie nablyudeniya v Zapadnoi Turkmenii [Ornithological observations in Western Turkmenia]. Stavropol: Stavropol State Pedagogical University.Google Scholar
Khokhlov, A.N., Il’yukh, M.P., Emel’yanov, S.A., et al. 1998. K Letnei Ornitofaune Nizoviy Reki Kumy i Prilezhashchikh Territoriy [On the Summer Ornithofauna of Lower Parts of the Kuma River and Adjoining Territories], 135–143.Google Scholar
Kijko, A.O. and Yakubenya, O.I. 1995. Кийко А. О., Якубеня О. І. Видовий склад, поширення та живлення сов у Львівській області // Пробл. вивч. та охор. птахів. – Львів-Чернівці, 1995. – С. 61-63. [The Species Composition, Distribution and Feeding of Owls in the Lviv Region (Ukraine). Problems in the Study and Conservation of Birds]. Lviv-chernivtsi, 61–63 [In Ukrainian].Google Scholar
Kinsky, F.C. 1973. The subspecific status of the New Zealand population of the Little Owl, Athene noctua (Scopoli, 1769). Notornis 20: 9–13.Google Scholar
Kirchberger, K. 1988. Artenschutzmöglichkeiten beim Steinkauz und Schwarzmilan Vogelschutz in Österreich. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Vogelkunde 2: 52–55Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, O. 1906. Strix Athene. Steinkauz Berajah.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, O. 1907. Zum geographischen Variieren von Strix Athene. Falco 3: 63–67.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, O. 1909. Beschreibung neuer Formen (Strix athene saharae nov. spp.). Falco 5: 19–20.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, O. 1909. Strix Saharae. Falco 5.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, O. 1934. Die Raubvögel der Heimat. Leipzig: Verlag Quelle et Meyer, 15.Google Scholar
Kloibhofer, F. and Lugmair, A. 2018. Artenschutzprojekt Steinkauz in Oberösterreich. Jahresbericht 2018. Unveröffentlichter Bericht im Auftrag der Naturschutzabteilung d. Amtes der OÖ Landesregierung.Google Scholar
Knaus, P., Antoniazza, S., Wechsler, S., et al. 2018. Atlas des oiseaux nicheurs de Suisse 2013–2016. Distribution et évolution des effectifs des oiseaux en Suisse et au Lichtenstein. Sempach: Station Ornithologique Suisse.Google Scholar
Knötzsch, G. 1978. Ansiedlungsversuche und Notizen zur Biologie des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Vogelwelt 99: 41–54.Google Scholar
Knötzsch, G. 1985. Zwölfjährige Populationsuntersuchungen an einem isolierten Vorkommen des Steinkauzes im Bodenseegebiet. In Bundesweiter Tagung der A.G. zum Schutz bedrohter Eulen am 2/3 März 1985 in Grävenwiesbach, D.B.V. Zusammenfassung der Vorträge. Soest: A.G. Eulen, 3–4.Google Scholar
Knötzsch, G. 1988. Bestandsentwicklung einer Nistkasten-Population des Steinkauzes Athene noctua am Bodensee. Vogelwelt 109: 164–171.Google Scholar
Koblik, E.A. 2001. Raznoobrazie Ptits (po Materialam Ekspozitsii Zoologicheskogo Muzeya MGU) [Bird Diversity (Proceedings of the Zoological Museum of Moscow State University)]. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 3.Google Scholar
Komarov, Y.E. 1998. Ptitsy seliskikh naselennykh punktov respubliki Severnaya Ossetia-Alania [Birds of countryside settlement of Republic of Northern Ossetia-Alania]. Kavkazskiy Ornithologicheskiy Vestnik [Caucasian Ornithological Bulletin] 10: 65–74.Google Scholar
König, C. 1969. Extrem kurze Brutdauer beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Vogelwelt 90: 66–67.Google Scholar
König, C., Weick, F. and Becking, J.-H. 1999. Owls: A Guide to the Owls of the World. Flossmoor, IL: Pica Press.Google Scholar
König, C., Weick, F. and Becking, J.-H. 2008. Owls of the World, second edition. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Koop, M.-H. 1996. Freilandökologischer Vergleich der Kleinsäuger-, Laufkäfer-und Regenwurm-Abundanz mit deren Nutzung als Beute durch den Steinkauz Athene noctua (Scopoli, 1769) in drei Steinkauzrevieren der Mechernicher Voreifel. Diplom-Arbeit am Institut für Angewandte Zoologie der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität, Bonn.Google Scholar
Köppl, C., Futterer, E., Nieder, B., Sistermann, R. and Wagner, H. 2005. Embryonic and posthatching development of the barn owl (Tyto alba): reference data for age determination. Developmental Dynamics 233: 1248–1260.Google Scholar
Kopystynska, K. 1962. Investigations on infra-red vision in animals. Part III. Preliminary experiments on the Little Owl Athene noctua (Scop.). Prace Zoologiczne 7: 95–107.Google Scholar
Korpimäki, E. 1988. Effects of territory quality on occupancy, breeding performance, and breeding dispersal in Tengmalm’s owl. Journal of Animal Ecology 57: 97–108.Google Scholar
Korpimäki, E., Hakkarainen, H., Ilmonen, P. and Wiehn, J. 2002. Detrimental effects of blood parasites on parental effort and reproductive success of Tengmalm’s Owls (Aegolius funereus) and Eurasian Kestrels (Falco tinnunculus). In Newton, I., Kavanagh, R., Olsen, J. and Taylor, I. (eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Owls. Canberra: CSIRO, 68–73.Google Scholar
Korpimäki, E., Tolonen, P. and Bennett, G. F. 1995. Blood parasites, sexual selection and reproductive success of European kestrels. Ecoscience 2: 335–343.Google Scholar
Kostadinova, I. (ed.) 1997. Important Bird Areas in Bulgaria. BSPB Conservation Series. Book 1. Sofia: BSPB [In Bulgarian].Google Scholar
Kostin, Y.V. 1983. Ptitsy Kryma (Birds of the Crimea). Moscow: Nauka, 144–145.Google Scholar
Kostrzewa, A., Ferrer-Lerin, F. and Kostrzewa, R. 1986. Abundance, status and vulnerability of raptors and owls in parts of the Spanish Pyrennees. Bulletin of World Working Group on Birds of Prey 3: 186–187.Google Scholar
Kowalski, M., Lippoman, T. and Oglecki, P. 1991. Liczebnosc sow Strigiformes we wschodniej czesci Puszczy Kampinoskiej [Census of owls Strigiformes in the Eastern part of Kampinos National Park (Central Poland)]. Acta Ornitholecologica 26: 23–29.Google Scholar
Krings, M., Muller, M., Limberger, E. and Wagner, H. 2020. Embryonic development of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) and Tengmalm’s Owl (Aegolius funereus) compared to the American Barn Owl (Tyto furcata): reference data for staging. Journal of Ornithology 161: 267–273.Google Scholar
Krings, M., Müller-Limberger, E. and Wagner, H. 2018. EvoDevo in owl ear asymmetry – the little owl (Athene noctua). Zoology 132: 1–5.Google Scholar
Krischer, O. 1990. Rückgang der Steinkauzpopulation in der Region Basel Mitglieder-Informationen AG zum Schutz dbedrohter. Eulen 35: 3–4.Google Scholar
Kuhn, W. 1992. Analyse von Steinkauzgewöllen mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung der Koleopteren. Dilpomarbeit des Fachbereichs Forstwirtschaft der Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität.Google Scholar
Kuhn, W. 1995. Struktur und jahreszeitliche Verteilung von Käfern in Steinkauzgewöllen. Eulen-Rundblick, AG Eulen 42: 12–15.Google Scholar
Kulaeva, T.M. 1977. Sovoobraznye [Strigiformes]. In Ptitsy Volzhsko-Kamskogo kraya [Birds of the Volga-Kama Territory]. Moscow: Nauka Press, 239–257.Google Scholar
Laaksonen, T., Hakkarainen, H. and Korpimäki, E. 2004. Lifetime reproduction of a forest-dwelling owl increases with age and area of forests. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B (Suppl.) 271: 461–464.Google Scholar
Labitte, A. 1951. Notes biologiques sur la Chouette chevêche, Carine noctua vidalii A.E. Brehm, 1857. L’Oiseau et Revue Française d’Ornithologie 21: 120–126.Google Scholar
Lack, D. 1946. Competition for food by birds of prey. Journal of Animal Ecology 15: 128.Google Scholar
Lack, D. 1954. The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lancum, F.H. 1925. Further observations on the food of the Little Owl. Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture 32: 170–173.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1988. Demographic models of the northern spotted owl (Strix orientalis caurina). Oecologia 75: 601–607.Google Scholar
Latham, J. 1790. Index Ornithologicus Sive Systema Ornithologiae. London: Prostant Venales Apud Leigh et Sotheby.Google Scholar
Laursen, J.T. 1981. Prey of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in East Jutland, Denmark. Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift 75: 105–110.Google Scholar
Lecomte, P. 1995. Le statut de la Chouette chevêche Athene noctua en Ile-de-France. Evolution et perspectives Alauda 63: 43–50.Google Scholar
Lecomte, P., Lapios, J.-M. and Génot, J.-C. 2001. In Génot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), Plan de restauration des populations de Chevêches d’Athéna en France. Ciconia 25: 159–171.Google Scholar
Lederer, W. and Kämpfer-Lauenstein, A. 1996. Einfluss der Witterung auf die Brutbiologie einer Steinkauzpopulation (Athene noctua) in Mittelwestfalen. Populationsökologie Greifvögel und Eulenarten 3: 353–360.Google Scholar
Lefeuvre, J.-C. 1981. Les études scientifiques, un préalable indispensable à la restructuration foncière et à l’aménagement des zones agricoles bocagères. In Ecologie et Développement, Journées Scientifiques des 19–20 Septembre 1979. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Lei, F.M., Cheng, T.H. and Yin, Z.H. 1997. On distribution, habitat and the clinal variations of the subspecies of the Little Owl Athene noctua in China (Strigiformes: Strigidae). Acta Zootaxonomical Sinica 22: 327–334.Google Scholar
Leicht, U. 1992. Erfahrungen mit der Steinkauzzucht und der Auswilderung. Naturschutzzentrum Wasserschloss Midwitz 2: 35.Google Scholar
Leigh, R.S. 2001a. In Génot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), The breeding dynamics of Little Owls (Athene noctua) in North West England. Ciconia 25: 67–76.Google Scholar
Leigh, R.S. 2001b. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.), Working structure of the European conservation plan for the Little Owl Athene noctua: the way forward. Oriolus 67: 142–146.Google Scholar
Letty, J., Génot, J.-C. and Sarrazin, F. 2001a. Viabilité de la population de Chevêche d’Athéna Athene noctua dans le Parc naturel régional des Vosges du Nord. Alauda 69: 359–372.Google Scholar
Letty, J., Génot, J.-C. and Sarrazin, F. 2001b. In Génot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), Analyse de viabilité de la population de Chevêche d’Athéna (Athene noctua) dans le Parc naturel régional des Vosges du Nord. Ciconia 25: 147–152.Google Scholar
Libois, R. 1977. Contribution à l’étude du régime alimentaire de la Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua) en Belgique. Aves 14: 165–177.Google Scholar
Lilleleht, V. and Leibak, E. 1992. Rarities in Estonia till 1989: report of the Estonian Rarities Committee (3). Hirundo 10: 3–20.Google Scholar
Limparungpatthanakij, W., Packer, J., Packer, A. and Hussain, F. 2017. Little Owl Athene noctua at Se La Pass, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian Birds 13: 160–161.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1746. Fauna Svecica. Lugduni Batavorum: Conradum Wishoff et Georg. Jac. Wishoff. Fil. Conr.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae: Impensis Driect.Google Scholar
Lippens, L. and Wille, H. 1972. Atlas des Oiseaux de Belgique et d’Europe Occidentale. Tielt: Lannoo, 500–501.Google Scholar
Lipsberg, Yu. K. 1985. Domovyi sych [Little Owl]. Sarkana gramata Latvijas PSR [Red Data Book of the Latvian SSR]. Riga: “Zinatne” Publishing House, 452–453.Google Scholar
Lo Verde, G. and Massa, B. 1988. Abitudini alimentari della Civetta (Athene noctua) in Sicilia. Naturalista Siciliano 4: 145–149.Google Scholar
Lockley, R.M. 1938. The Little Owl inquiry and the Skokholm-Petrels. British Birds 31: 278–279.Google Scholar
López-Idiáquez, D., Fargallo, J.A., López-Rull, I. and Martínez-Padilla, J. 2019. Plumage coloration and personality in early life: sexual differences in signalling. Ibis 161: 216–221.Google Scholar
Lord, J. and Ainsworth, G.H. 1945. Fight between Little Owls and Barn Owls. British Birds 38: 275.Google Scholar
Lorgé, P. and Melchior, E. 2010. Die Vögel Luxemburgs. Kockelscheuer: Letzebuerger Natur a Vulleschutz-Liga.Google Scholar
Loske, K.-H. 1978. Hilfe für den Steinkauz Ornithologische. Mitteilungen 30: 19–21.Google Scholar
Loske, K.-H. 1986. Zum Habitat des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Vogelwelt 107: 81–101.Google Scholar
Loske, K.-H. and Loske, R. 1981. Quantitative Erfassung von Biotopverlusten dargestellt am Beispiel des Langeneicker Bruches (Kreis Soast). Natur und Landschaft Westfalen 17: 79–82.Google Scholar
Louchart, A. 2005. Integrating the fossil record in the study of insular body size evolution; example of owls (Aves, Strigiformes). In Alcover, J.A. and Bover, , P. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Syposium “Insular Vertebrate Evolution: The Paleontological Approach”. Monografies de la Societat d’Història Natural de les Balears 12. Palma: Societat d’Història Natural de les Balears, 155–174.Google Scholar
Loudon, H. 1906. Über des Vorkommen des Steinkauzes, Carine noctua Retz, in den Ostseeprovinzen. Ornithologische Monatsber 14: 190–191.Google Scholar
Lourenço, R., Moreira, S., Roque, I. and Tomé, R. 2021. Estimating the population and distribution trends of owls in Portugal using citizen science data from Program NOCTUA-Portugal and other sources. In Roque, I., Duncan, J.R., Johnson, D.H. and Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 World Owl Conference, Evora, Portugal. Airo 29: 291–305.Google Scholar
Lourenço, R., Roque, I., Tomé, R., Sepúlveda, P., Atlas, Equipa, Melo, C. and Pereira, C. 2015. Current status and distribution of nocturnal birds (Strigiformes and Caprimulgiformes) in Portugal. Airo 23: 36–50.Google Scholar
Lourenço, R., Tavares, P.C., Del Mar Delgado, M., Rabaça, J.E. and Penteriani, V. 2011. Superpredation increases mercury levels in a generalist top predator, the eagle owl. Ecotoxicology 20: 635–642.Google Scholar
Lucas, P. 1996. Comparaison entre deux populations de Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua) en province de Liège. Aves 33: 85–92.Google Scholar
Luder, R. and Stange, C. 2001. Entwicklung einer Population des Steinkauzes Athene noctua bei Basel 1978–1993. Ornithologische Beobachter 98: 237–248.Google Scholar
Luginbühl, J. 1908. Etwas vom Steinkauz. Ornithologische Beobachter 6: 166–167.Google Scholar
Lugmair, A. and Kloibhofer, F. 2021. Artenschutzprojekt Steinkauz in Oberösterreich – Jahresbericht 2021. Im Auftrag der Naturschutzabteilung d. Linz: Amt der OÖ Landesregierung.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.P. 1993. Insectes coprophages et médicaments vétérinaires: une menace à prendre au sérieux. Insectes 91: 2–3.Google Scholar
Lyaister, A.F. and Sosnin, G.V. 1942. Materialy po ornitofaune Armyanskoi SSR (Ornis Armenica) [Materials on Ornithofauna of the Armenian SSR (Ornis Armenica)]. Yerevan: AN SSSR Arm. filial. Biol. in-t (Academy of Science of the U.S.S.R. Biological Institute), 5–10 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Madon, P. 1933. Les Rapaces d’Europe, Leur Régime, Leurs Relations Avec l’Agriculture et la Chasse. Toulon: Lechevalier, 97–113.Google Scholar
Magnus, A. 1495. Diui Alberti Magni de Animalibus libri vigintisex Nouissime Impressi. Venedig: Johannes et Gregorius de Gregoriis.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, M.C. 2011. The use of nest boxes by roosting birds during the non-breeding season: a review of the costs and benefits. Ardea 99: 167–176.Google Scholar
Makatsch, W. 1976. Die Eier der Vögel Europas. Band 2. Neudamn, Melsungen, Berlin, Basel, Wien: Verlag J. Neumann, 43–45.Google Scholar
Malchevskiy, A.S. and Pukinskiy, Y.B. 1983. Ptitsy Leningradskoi oblasti isopredelnykh territoriy [Birds of Leningrad Region and Adjoining Territories]. Vol. 1. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press [In Russian].Google Scholar
Malmstigen, J.E. 1970. Ryttling hos minervauggla, Athene noctua. Var Fagelvärld 29: 231.Google Scholar
Manez, M. 1983a. Espectro alimentacio del Mochuelo comun (Athene noctua) en Espana. Alytes 1: 275–290.Google Scholar
Manez, M. 1983b. Variaciones geograficas y estacionales en la dieta del Mochuelo comun (Athene noctua). Actas del XV congreso international de fauna cinegetica y silvestre, Trujillo (Cáceres) España, 1981. Seville: Estacion Biologica de Doñana, Federacion Española de Caza, 617–634.Google Scholar
Marchant, J.H., Hudson, R., Carter, S.P. and Whittington, P. 1990. Population Trends in British Breeding Birds. Tring: Nature Conservancy Council/BTO, 114–116.Google Scholar
Marcot, B.G. and Johnson, D.H. 2003. Owls in mythology and culture. In Duncan, J.R. (ed.), Owls of the World: Their Lives, Behavior and Survival. Toronto: Key Porter Books, 89–105.Google Scholar
Marié, P. and Leysen, M. 2001. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.), Contribution to the design of an anti-marten Martes foina system to limit predation in Little Owl Athene noctua nest boxes. Oriolus 67: 126–131.Google Scholar
Marinatos, S. 1968. Excavations in Pylos. Prakt 1968: 119–132.Google Scholar
Martí, R. and Del Moral, J.C. (eds.) 2003. Atlas de las Aves Reproductoras de España. Madrid: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-Sociedad Española de Ornitología.Google Scholar
Martin, A.L.B., Gaskett, A.C. and Friesen, M.R. 2018. Feather colours of live birds and museum specimens look similar when viewed by seabirds. Ibis 160: 185–189.Google Scholar
Martin, R. and Rollinat, R. 1914. Description et Moeurs des Mammifères, Oiseaux, Reptiles, Batraciens et Poissons de la France Centrale. Paris: Paul Lechevalier, 97–98.Google Scholar
Martin, R. and Rollinat, R. 1982. Les oiseaux du département de l’Indre à la fin du 19ème siècle. In Les Vertébrés Sauvages du Département de l’Indre. Paris: Groupe d’Etude de l’Avifaune de l’Indre, 17–18.Google Scholar
Martinez, J.A. and Zuberogoitia, I. 2003. La urbanización litoral de Alicante reduce la población de mochuelos. Quercus 203: 52.Google Scholar
Martinez, J.A. and Zuberogoitia, I. 2004a. Effects of habitat loss on perceived and actual abundance of the Little Owl Athene noctua in eastern Spain. Ardeola 51: 215–219.Google Scholar
Martinez, J.A. and Zuberogoitia, I. 2004b. Habitat preferences for Long-eared Owls Asio otus and Little Owls Athene noctua in semi-arid environments at three spatial scales. Bird Study 51: 163–169.Google Scholar
Martinez, J.A., Zuberogoitia, I. and Alonso, R. 2002. Rapaces Nocturnas: Guia para la Determinacion de la Edad y el Sexo en las Estrigiformes Ibericas. Madrid: Monticola Ed., 86–95.Google Scholar
Martinez, J.E., Sanchez, M.A., Carmona, D., et al. 1992. The ecology and conservation of the Eagle Owl Bubo bubo in Murcia, south-east Spain. Pp. 84–88 in C. A. Galbraith, I. R. Taylor and S. Percival, eds. The ecology and conservation of European owls. Peterborough, U.K.: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.Google Scholar
März, R. and Weglau, I. 1957. Rupfungs-und Gewöllaufsammlung bei Darfel/Westfalen. Vogelwelt 78: 110–112.Google Scholar
Mastrorilli, M. 1997. Popolazioni di Civetta (Athene noctua) e selezioni dell’habitat in un’area di pianura della provincia di Bergamo. Rivista Museo civico Scienze Naturali "E.Caffi" 19: 15–19.Google Scholar
Mastrorilli, M. 1999. Caratteristiche dei ricoveri e dei siti riproduttivi di Civetta Athene noctua nelle province di Bergamo e Cremona. Avocetta 23: 163.Google Scholar
Mastrorilli, M. 2000. Seconda nidificazione di Civetta, Athene noctua, in Corsica. Rivista Italiana di Ornithologia 70: 89–91.Google Scholar
Mastrorilli, M. 2001. Little Owl Athene noctua status and habitat selection in the town of Bergamo (Lombardy, Northern Italy). Oriolus 67: 136–141.Google Scholar
Mastrorilli, M. 2005. La Civetta in Italia. Brescia: Araspix Editrice.Google Scholar
Matvejev, S.D. 1950. La Distribution et la Vie des Oiseaux en Serbie (Ornithogeographia Serbica). Monographies – T. Clxi. Institut d’ecologie et de Biogéographie No. 3. Belgrade: Academie Serbe des Sciences.Google Scholar
Mayer, M., Šálek, M., Fox, A.D., et al. 2021. Fine-scale movement patterns and habitat selection of little owls (Athene noctua) from two declining populations. PLoS One 16: e0256608.Google Scholar
Mayor, S.J., Schneider, D.C., Schaefer, J.A. and Mahoney, S.P. 2009. Habitat selection at multiple scales. Écoscience 16: 238–247.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1940. Speciation phenomena in birds. American Naturalist 74: 249–278.Google Scholar
McGarigal, K., Wan, H.Y., Zeller, K.A., Timm, B.C. and Cushma, S.A. 2016. Multi-scale habitat selection modeling: a review and outlook. Landscape Ecology 31: 1161–1175.Google Scholar
Mearns, B. and Mearns, R. 1998. The Bird Collectors. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mebs, T. and Scherzinger, W. 2000. Die Eulen Europas: Biologie, Kennzeichen, Bestände. Kosmos Naturführer. Stuttgart: Kosmos.Google Scholar
Medlin, F. 1967. Centuries of Owls in Art and the Written Word. Norwalk, CT: Silvermine Publishers.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 1998. Suivi et protection de la Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua) dans le canton de Genève, Suisse: Aperçu de la période d’étude 1984–1997. Genève: Nos Oiseaux, 1–4.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 2013. Programme de conservation de la Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Canton de Genève, Rapport Annuel 2012. Geneva: Groupe Ornithologique du Bassin Genevois.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 2014. Programme de conservation de la Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Canton de Genève, Rapport Annuel 2013. Geneva: Groupe Ornithologique du Bassin Genevois.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 2015. Programme de conservation de la Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Canton de Genève, Rapport Annuel 2014. Geneva: Groupe Ornithologique du Bassin Genevois.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 2016. Programme de conservation de la Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Canton de Genève, Rapport Annuel 2015. Geneva: Groupe Ornithologique du Bassin Genevois.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 2017. Programme de conservation de la Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Canton de Genève, Rapport Annuel 2016. Geneva: Groupe Ornithologique du Bassin Genevois.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 2018. Programme de conservation de la Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Canton de Genève, Rapport Annuel 2017. Geneva: Groupe Ornithologique du Bassin Genevois.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 2019. Programme de conservation de la Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Canton de Genève, Rapport Annuel 2018. Geneva: Groupe Ornithologique du Bassin Genevois.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 2020. Programme de conservation de la Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Canton de Genève, Rapport Annuel 2019. Geneva: Groupe Ornithologique du Bassin Genevois.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 2021. Programme de conservation de la Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Canton de Genève, Rapport Annuel 2020. Geneva: Groupe Ornithologique du Bassin Genevois.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. 2022. Programme de conservation de la Chevêche d’Athéna dans le Canton de Genève, Rapport Annuel 2021. Geneva: Groupe Ornithologique du Bassin Genevois.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. and Albrecht, P. 2001. Suivi et protection de la Chevêche d’Athéna (Athena noctua) dans le canton de Genève, Suiss (Période 1984–2000). Ciconia 25: 191–197.Google Scholar
Meisser, C. and Juillard, M 1998. Steinkauz. In Schmid, H., Luder, R., Naef-Daenzer, B., Graf, R. and Zbinden, N. (eds.), Schweizer Brutvogelatlas. Verbreitung der Brutvögel in der Schweiz und im Fürstentum Liechtenstein 1993–1996. Sempach: Schweizerische Vogelwarte, 282–283.Google Scholar
Meisser, C., Brahier, A. Lardelli, R. Schudel, H. and Kestenholz, M. 2016. Aktionsplan Steinkauz Schweiz. Artenförderung Vögel Schweiz. Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt OFEV, Schweizerische Vogelwarte, Schweizer Vogelschutz SVS/BirdLife Schweiz, Umwelt-Vollzug Nr. 1638.Google Scholar
Meklenburtsev, R.N. 1936. Materialy po mlekopitayushchim i ptitsam Pamira [Materials on mammals and birds of Pamir]. Tashkent. ill. Ser. 8a. Zool. Issue 22. Rezul’taty Pamir. ekspeditsii Sredne-Az. gos. un-ta [Results of Pamir expedition of Middle-Asian State University). Trudy Sredne-Az. un-ta [Proceedings of the Middle-Asian University] 4: 39–40 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Meklenburtsev, R.N. 1946. Зимующие и пролетные птицы Восточного Памира [Wintering and passage birds of Eastern Pamir]. Bulletin of Moscow Naturalists Society 51: 87–110.Google Scholar
Meklenburtsev, R.N. 1958. Материалы по наземным позвоночным бассейна реки Кашка-дарья: Материалы Кашка-дарьинской экспедиции биолого-почвенного факультета Среднеазиацкого гос. ун-та им. В.И. Ленина [Materials on terrestrial vertebrates of Kashka-Daria River basin: materials of Kashka-Darian expedition of biology-soil department of Middle-Asian State University named after V.I. Lenin]. Trudy Sredne-Az. un-ta [Proceedings of the Middle-Asian University] 130: 30 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Melchior, E., Mentgen, E., Peltzer, R., Schmitt, R. and Weiss, J. 1987. Atlas des Oiseaux Nicheurs du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. Kockelscheuer: Lëtzebuerger Natur-a Vulleschutzliga, 122–123.Google Scholar
Mercier, A. 1921. Valeur économique de quelques rapaces. Gerfaut 11: 65.Google Scholar
Meschini, E. and Frugis, S. 1993. Atalante degli uccelli nidifcante in Italia. Supplemento alle Ricerche di Biologia della Selvaggina 20: 148.Google Scholar
Meyer, L.B. 1815. Kurze Beschreibung der Vögel Liv- und Ehstlands. Nürnberg: Johann Leonhard Schräg.Google Scholar
Meyknecht, J. 1941. Farbensehen und Helligkeitsunterscheidung beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua vidalii A.E. Brehm). Ardea 30: 129–170.Google Scholar
Mezzavilla, F. and Bettiol, K. (eds.) 2007. Nuovo Atlante degli Uccelli nidificanti in provincia di Treviso (2003–2006). Venice: Associazione Faunisti Veneti.Google Scholar
Michel, V.T., Jiménez-Franco, M.V., Naef-Daenzer, B. and Grüebler, M.U. 2016. Intraguild predator drives forest edge avoidance of a mesopredator. Ecosphere 7: 1–12.Google Scholar
Michel, V.T., Naef-Daenzer, B., Keil, H. and Grüebler, M.U. 2015. Häufigkeit, Ursachen und Konsequenzen der Brutplatzwechsel beim Steinkauz Athene noctua. In 148. Jahresversammlung der DO-G, Konstanz. Wilhelmshaven: Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaf, 426.Google Scholar
Michel, V. T., Naef-Daenzer, B., Keil, H. and Grüebler, M.U. 2017. Reproductive consequences of farmland heterogeneity in little owls (Athene noctua). Oecologia 183: 1019–1029.Google Scholar
Mikkola, H. 1976. Owls killing and killed by other owls and raptors in Europe. British Birds 69: 144–154.Google Scholar
Mikkola, H. 1983. Owls of Europe. Calton: Poyser, 126–135.Google Scholar
Miller, G.S. 1989. Dispersal of Juvenile Northern Spotted Owls in Western Oregon. MS thesis. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.Google Scholar
Mills, D.G.H. 1981. Cannibalism among Little Owls. British Birds 74: 354.Google Scholar
Mingozzi, T., Boano, G. and Pulcher, C. 1988. Atlante degli uccelli nidificanti in Piemonte e Valle d’Aosta Monograf. Vol. VIII. Torino: Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali.Google Scholar
Mishchenko, A., 2004. Otsenka chislennosti i eyo dinamiki dlya ptits Evropeiskoi chasti Rossii [Estimation of numbers and trends for birds of the European part of Russia]. In Ptitsy Evropy II [Birds in Europe II]. Moscow: Russian Bird Conservation Union, 10–14 [In Russian with English summary].Google Scholar
Misonne, X. 1948. Le régime de la Chouette chevêche Athene noctua vidalii A.E. Brehm. Gerfaut 38: 89.Google Scholar
Mlíkovský, J. and Piechocki, R. 1983. Biometrische Untersuchungen, zum Geschlechtsdimorphismus einiger mitteleuropäische Eulen. Beiträge zur Vogelkunde 29: 1–11.Google Scholar
MME Nomenclator Bizottság 2008. Nomenclator Avium Hungariae. Magyarország madarainak névjegyzéke. Budapest: MME.Google Scholar
Mohr, H. 1989. Steinkäuze brüten wieder in Schwaben. Gefierdete Welt 113: 308–309.Google Scholar
Mohr, H. 1990. Bemerkenswertes aus dem Leben hessischer Steinkäuze (Athene noctua). Vogel und Umwelt 6: 63–69.Google Scholar
Molina, B., Nebreda, A. and Del Moral, J.C. 2021. III Atlas de las aves en época de reproducción en España. Madrid: SEO/BirdLife.Google Scholar
Møller, A.P., Biard, C., Blount, J.D., et al. 2000. Carotenoid-dependent signals: indicators of foraging efficiency, immunocompetence or detoxification ability? Poultry and Avian Biology Reviews 11: 137–160.Google Scholar
Møller, A.P., Nielsen, J.T. and Garamszegi, L.Z. 2006. Song post exposure, song features, and predation risk. Behavioral Ecology 17: 155–163.Google Scholar
Möller, B. 1993. Erste Ergebnisse zur Wiedereinbürgerung des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in den Landkreisen Hildesheim und Peine. Beiträge zur Naturkunde Niederscshens 46: 72–81.Google Scholar
Monrós, J.S., 1997. El Dominio Vital y Albunos Aspectos de la Ecologia de la Culebra Bastarda Malpolon monspessulanus en los Naranjales. PhD thesis. Valencia: University of Valencia.Google Scholar
Moreau, W.M. 1947. Kestrel robbing Little Owl. British Birds 40: 216–217.Google Scholar
Morrison, M.L. 2001. A proposed research emphasis to overcome the limits of wildlife-habitat relationship studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 65: 613–623.Google Scholar
Moschetti, G. and Mancini, D. 1993 . Dieta della Civetta Athene noctua (Scopoli) e sue variazioni stagionali in un parco urbano in ambiente mediterraneo. Gli Uccelli d’Italia 28: 3–12.Google Scholar
Mougeot, F. and Arroyo, B.E. 2006. Ultraviolet reflectance by the cere of raptors. Biology Letters 2: 173–176.Google Scholar
Mourer-Chauviré, C., Salotti, M., Pereira, E., et al. 1997. Athene angelis n. sp. (Aves, Strigiformes) nouvelle espece endémique insulaire éteinte du Pleistocene moyen et supérieur de Corse (France). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris 324: 677–684.Google Scholar
Mulder, B.S., Noon, B.R., Spies, T.A., et al. 1999. The strategy and design of the effectiveness monitoring program for the Northwest Forest Plan. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-437. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.Google Scholar
Müller, W. 1999. Untersuchungen zum Auftreten Alternativer Fortpflanzungsstrategien und zum Geschlechterverhältnis beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Diplomarbeit. Universität Bonn.Google Scholar
Müller, W., Epplen, J.T. and Lubjuhn, T. 2001. Genetic paternity analyses in Little Owls (Athene noctua): does the high rate of paternal care select against extra-pair young? Journal für Ornithologie 142: 195–203.Google Scholar
Muntaner, J., Ferrer, X. and Martínez–Vilalta, A. 1983. Atlas dels ocells nidificants de Catalunya i Andorra. Barcelona: Ketres.Google Scholar
Naef-Daenzer, B. and Grüebler, M. 2016. Post-fledging survival of altricial birds: ecological determinants and adaptation. Journal of Field Ornithology 87: 227–250.Google Scholar
Nankinov, D.N. 2002. Sovremennoe sostoyanie populyatsiy sov Bolgarii [Present situation of population of owls in Bulgaria]. Berkut 11: 48–60.Google Scholar
Naumann, J.A. 1803. Naturgeschichte der Land- und Wasser-Vögel des Nördlichen Deutschlands und Angränzender Länder, nach Eigenen Erfahrungen Entworfen, und nach dem Leben Gezeichnet. Bd. IV. Köthen: Verfasser.Google Scholar
Navarro, C., Perez-Contreras, T., Aviles, J.M., Mcgraw, K.J. and Soler, J.J. 2010. Beak colour reflects circulating carotenoid and vitamin A levels in spotless starlings (Sturnus unicolor). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64: 1057–1067.Google Scholar
Navarro, J., Minguez, E., Garcia, D., et al. 2005. Differential effectiveness of playbacks for Little Owls (Athene noctua) surveys before and after sunset. Journal of Raptor Research 39: 454–457.Google Scholar
Neal, J.C., Montague, W.G. and James, D.A. 1993. Climbing by black rat snakes on cavity trees of Red-Cockaded woodpeckers. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21: 160–165.Google Scholar
Negro, J.-J., De La Riva, M. and Hiraldo, F. 1990. Daytime activity of Little Owls (Athene noctua) in southwestern Spain. Journal of Raptor Research 24: 72–74.Google Scholar
Newton, I. 1979. Population Ecology of Raptors. Berkhamsted: T. and A.D. Poyser.Google Scholar
Newton, I. 1998. Population Limitations in Birds. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Newton, I. 2002. Population limitation in Holarctic owls. In Newton, I., Kavanagh, R., Olsen, J. and Taylor, I. (eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Owls. Canberra: CSIRO Publishing, 3–29.Google Scholar
Newton, I., Wyllie, I. and Dale, L. 1997. Mortality causes in British Barn Owls (Tyto alba), based on 1,101 carcasses examined during 1963–1996. In Duncan, J.R., Johnson, D.H. and Nichols, T.H. (eds.), Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere: 2nd International Symposium, 1997 February 5–9 1997, Winnipeg, Manitoba. General Technical Report NC-190. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Forest Service, 299–307.Google Scholar
Nicolai, B. 1993. Atlas der Brutvögel Ostdeutschlands. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Nicolai, B. 2000. Bestandsentwicklung und Situation des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in Sachsen-Anhalt. Apus 10: 55–64.Google Scholar
Nienhuis, J., Willems, F. and Majoor, F. 2015. Digitale Nestkaart. Versie 5.3, mei 2015. Nijmegen: Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland.Google Scholar
Nikiforov, M.E., Kozulin, A.V., Grichik, V.V. and Tishechkin, A.K. 1997. Ptitsy Belarusi na rubezhe XXI veka [Birds of Belarus at the End of the XXI Century]. Minsk: N.A. Korolev.Google Scholar
Nikiforov, M.E., Yaminskiy, B.V. and Shklyarov, L.P. 1989. Belorussii Spravochnik: Opredelitel Gnedz i Yaits [Birds of Belarus: Guide to Nests and Eggs]. Minsk: Vysheishaya Shkola Press.Google Scholar
Noon, B.R. 2003. Conceptual issues in monitoring ecological resources. In Busch, D.E. and Trexler, J.C. (eds.), Monitoring Ecosystems: Interdisciplinary Approaches for Evaluating Ecoregional Initiatives. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 27–72.Google Scholar
Noon, B.R. and Franklin, A.B. 2002. Scientific research and the Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis): opportunities for major contributions to avian population ecology. The Auk 119: 311–320.Google Scholar
Nore, T. 1977. L’Autour et l’épervier en Limousin. Ornithologie Limousin 7: 25–41.Google Scholar
Nore, T. 1979. Rapaces diurnes communs en Limousin pendant la période de nidification (II: autour, épervier et faucon crécerelle). Alauda 47: 265.Google Scholar
Ntalampiras, S. and Potamitis, I. 2021. Acoustic detection of unknown bird species and individuals. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology 2021: 1–10.Google Scholar
Olea, P.P. 1997. Mochuelo comun. Athene noctua. In Purroy, J. (ed.), Atlas de las Aves de Espana (1975–1995). Cerdanyola del Vallès: Lynx Edicions, 260–261.Google Scholar
Oles, T. 1961. Observations on the food habits in Little Owl. Przeglad Zoologiczny 4: 377–378.Google Scholar
Olioso, G. 1996. Oiseaux de Vaucluse et de la Drôme Provençale. Paris: C.R.O.P., C.E.E.P. et S.E.O.F, 86.Google Scholar
Oliphant, L.W. 1987. Pteridines and purines as major pigments of the avian iris. Pigment Cell Research 1: 129–131.Google Scholar
Oliphant, L.W. and Hudon, J. 1993. Pterines as reflecting pigments and components of reflecting on black ratsnakes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32: 900–906.Google Scholar
Onkelinx, T. and Everaert, J. 2018. Verklarend onderzoek naar landschapskenmerken op de verspreiding van de Steenuil Athene noctua in de ruilverkaveling Gooik. Vlaamse Landmaatschappij: Instituut voor Natuurbehoud.Google Scholar
Onrust, J. and Piersma, T. 2017. The hungry worm feeds the bird. Ardea 105: 153–161.Google Scholar
Opdam, P. 1991. Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landscape Ecology 5: 93–106.Google Scholar
Orf, M. 2001. Habitatnutzung und Aktionsraumgrösse des Steinkäuze Athene noctua im Main-Taunus-Kreis. Frankfurt am Main: Diplomarbeit im Fachbereich Biologie der Johann Wolgang Goethe-Universität.Google Scholar
Orlando, G., Varesio, A. and Chamberlain, D. 2021. Field evaluation for playback surveys: species-specific detection probabilities and distance estimation errors in a nocturnal bird community. Bird Study 2021: 1–10.Google Scholar
Ornithological Society of Turkey 1969. Bird report 1966–1967. Nicosia, Cyprus: Ornithological Society Of Turkey, 88.Google Scholar
Orsini, P. 1985. Le régime alimentaire du Hibou grand-duc Bubo bubo en Provence. Alauda 53: 11–28.Google Scholar
Osieck, E.R. and Hustings, F. 1994. Rode lijst van bedreigde soorten en blauwe lijst van belangrijke soorten in Nederland. Technisch Rapport 12. Zeist: Vogelbescherming Nederland.Google Scholar
Osmolovskaya, V.I. 1953. Geograficheskoe raspredelenie khishchnykh ptits ravninnogo Kazakhstana i ikh znachenie v istreblenii vreditelei [Geographical distribution of the birds of prey of the plain Kazakhstan and their importance in extermination of pests]. Trudy Instituta Geografii [Proceedings of the Institute of Geography], AN. SSSR [Academy of Science of the U.S.S.R.] 54: 219–307.Google Scholar
Otto, A. and Ullrich, T. 2000. Schutz des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in der südlichen Ortenau und in angrenzenden Gebieten. Naturschutz am südlichen Oberrhein 3: 49–54.Google Scholar
Owen, J.H. 1919. On the procuring of food by the male for the female among birds of prey. British Birds 13: 29.Google Scholar
Pačenovský, S. 2002. Kuvik obyčajný (Athene noctua). In Danko, Š., Darolová, A. and Krištín, A. (eds.), Rozšírenie vtákov na Slovensku. Bratislava: Veda, 367–369.Google Scholar
Palmer, P. 1989. Little Owl and grey squirrel in same nest-box. British Birds 82: 221.Google Scholar
Pardieu, Marquis De 1927. Nidification précoce d’une Chevêche. Revue Française d’ Ornithologie 11: 118.Google Scholar
Parejo, D. and Avilés, J.M. 2011. Predation risk determines breeding territory choice in a Mediterranean cavity-nesting bird community. Oecologia 165: 185–191.Google Scholar
Parejo, D. and Avilés, J.M. 2020. Melanism influences the use of social information in a polymorphic owl. Scientific Reports 10: 1869.Google Scholar
Parejo, D., Avilés, J.M. and Exposito-Granados, M. 2018. Receivers matter: the meaning of alarm calls and competition for nest sites in a bird community. Oecologia 187: 707–717.Google Scholar
Parejo, D., Avilés, J.M. and Rodríguez, J. 2010. Visual cues and parental favouritism in a nocturnal bird. Biology Letters 6: 171–173.Google Scholar
Paris, P. 1909. Anomalies observées chez quelques oiseaux de la Côte d’Or. Revue Française d’Ornithologie 1: 104.Google Scholar
Parkin, A.T. and Knox, A.G. 2010. The Status of Birds in Britain and Ireland. London: Christopher Helm.Google Scholar
Parmentier, F. and Van Paassen, A. 2009. Steenuil Onder de Pannen: Maatregelencatalogus ter Verbetering van het Leefgebied van de Steenuil. De Bilt: Landschapsbeheer Nederland.Google Scholar
Parslow, J.L.F. 1967. Changes in status among breeding birds in Britain and Ireland. British Birds 60: 190–200.Google Scholar
Passarotto, A., Cruz-Miralles, A. and Avilés, J.M. 2020. Iris yellowness relates to age and individual quality in two owl species. Journal of Raptor Research 54: 233–244.Google Scholar
Patev, P. 1950. Birds of Bulgaria. Vol. 1. Sofia: BAS [In Bulgarian].Google Scholar
Pavia, M. and Mourer-Chauviré, C. 2002. An overview of the genus Athene in the Pleistocene of the Mediterranean Islands, with the description of Athene trinacriae n. sp. (Aves: Strigidae). In Zhou, Z. and Zhang, F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Symposium of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution. Beijing: Science Press, 13–27.Google Scholar
Pedersen, D., Thorup, K., Sunde, P., Jacobsen, L.B. and Rahbek, C. 2013. Post-fledging behaviour of juveniles in the Little Owl (Athene noctua). Ornis Fennica 90: 117–128.Google Scholar
Peitzmeier, J. 1952. Langsamer Ausgleich der Winterluste beim Steinkauz. Vogelwelt 73: 136.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, I., Boatti, L., Cucco, M., et al. 2016. Development of SNP markers for population structure and phylogeography characterization in little owl (Athene noctua) using a genotyping- by-sequencing approach. Conservation Genetics Resources 8: 13–16.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, I. Cucco, M., Calà, E., Boano, G. and Pavia, M. 2020. Plumage coloration and morphometrics of the Little Owl Athene noctua in the Western Palearctic. Journal of Ornithology 161: 1071–1081.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, I., Negri, A., Boano, G., et al. 2015. Evidence for strong genetic structure in European populations of the Little Owl Athene noctua. Journal of Avian Biology 46: 462–475.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, I., Negri, A., Cucco, M., et al. 2014. Phylogeography and Pleistocene refugia of the Little Owl Athene noctua inferred from mtDNA sequence data. Ibis 156: 639–657.Google Scholar
Penteriani, V., Delgado, M.D.M., Alonso-Alvarez, C.N., et al. 2007. The importance of visual cues for nocturnal species: Eagle owl fledglings signal with white mouth feathers. Ethology 113: 934–943.Google Scholar
Pérez-López, M., Hermoso De Mendoza, M., Lopez Beceirob, A. and Soler Rodrıguez, F. 2008. Heavy metal (Cd, Pb, Zn) and metalloid (As) content in raptor species from Galicia (NW Spain). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 70: 154–162.Google Scholar
Peronace, V., Cecere, J.G., Gustin, M. and Rondinini, C. 2012. Lista Rossa 2011 degli Uccelli Nidificanti in Italia. Avocetta 36: 11–58.Google Scholar
Perrig, M., Grüebler, M.U., Keil, H. and Naef-Daenzer, B. 2014. Experimental food supplementation affects the physical development, behaviour and survival of Little Owl Athene noctua nestlings. Ibis 156: 755–767.Google Scholar
Perrig, M., Grüebler, M.U., Keil, H. and Naef-Daenzer, B. 2017. Post-fledging survival of Little Owls Athene noctua in relation to nestling food supply. Ibis 159: 532–540.Google Scholar
Pertoldi, C., Pellegrino, I., Cucco, M., et al. 2012. Genetic consequences of population decline in the Danish population of the little owl (Athene noctua). Evolutionary Ecology Research 14: 921–932.Google Scholar
Peter, W. 1999. Schutzmassnahmen für den Steinkauz (Athene noctua) und dessen Bestandsentwicklung im Main-Kinzig-Kreis Eulen-Rundblick, AG. Eulen 4849: 24–25.Google Scholar
Peters, J.L. 1940. Checklist of the Birds of the World. Vol IV. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, K.A. and Otis, D.L. 2007. Shorebird roost-site selection at two temporal scales: is human disturbance a factor? Journal of Applied Ecology 44: 196–209.Google Scholar
Peterson, A.T., Vieglais, D.A., Navarro Sigüenza, A.G. and Silva, M. 2003. A global distributed biodiversity information network: building the world museum. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 123A: 186–196.Google Scholar
Petzold, H. and Raus, T. 1973. Steinkauz (Athene noctua): Bestandsaufnahmen in Mittelwestfalen. Anthus 10: 25–38.Google Scholar
Pfister, O. 2001. Owls in Ladakh. Oriental Bird Club Bulletin 29: 22–29.Google Scholar
Piechocki, R. 1960. Über die Winterverluste der Schleiereule (Tyto alba). Vogelwarte 29: 277–280.Google Scholar
Piechocki, R. 1968. Die Grossfieder-Mauser des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Journal für Ornithologie 109: 30–36.Google Scholar
Pirovano, A. and Galeotti, P. 1999. Territorialismo intra-e interspecifica delle Civette Athene noctua in provincia di Pavia. Avocetta 23: 139.Google Scholar
Pitzer, W. 1995. Schleiereulen-und Steinkauzvorkommen am südlichen Rand des Ruhrgebiets. Falke 4: 121–124.Google Scholar
Plantinga, J-E. 1999. Plan van Aanpak Steenuil. Actierapport 14. Zeist: Vogelbescherming Nederland.Google Scholar
Pleguezuelos, J.M. 2003. Culebra bastarda: Malpolon monspessulanus. In Carrascal, L.M. and Salvador, A. (eds.), Enciclopedia Virtual de los Vertebrados Españoles. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. www.vertebradosibericos.org/ (accessed April 2023).Google Scholar
Pocora, V., Popovici, M., Manci, C.O. and Iorgu, I.S. 2012. Feeding of the little owl during nesting season in the Danube Delta (Romania). Analele Științifice ale Universității “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași, s. Biologie animală 58: 107–114.Google Scholar
Pointereau, P. and Bazile, D. 1995. Arbres des Champs, Haies, Alignements, Prés Vergers. Toulouse: Solagro.Google Scholar
Ponebšek, J. 1917. Naše ujede, I. del Sove. Ljubljana: Carniola, Muzejsko društvo za Kranjsko.Google Scholar
Popescu, A. and Negrea, I. 1987. Date privind hrana unor pasari rapitoare de noapte (Athene noctua noctua Scop.: Strigiformes) din judetul timis. Analele Universitatii Bucuresti Biologie 36: 67–70.Google Scholar
Popov, A.V. 1959. Ptitsy Gissaro-Karategina: Ekologo-geograficheskiy ocherk [Birds of the Gissaro-Karategin: Ecology-Geographical Sketch]. Stalinabad: Publishing House of the Academy of Science of the Tadjik SSR [In Russian].Google Scholar
Popov, V.V. 1991. K raspredeleniyu sov v yugo-zapadnoi Tuve [On owl distribution in southwestern Tuva (Tyva, Russia)]. Ornithologicheskie problemy Sibiri [Ornithological problems of Siberia]. Barnaul: Altai University Press, 152–154 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Poprach, K., Opluštil, L., Krause, F. and Machar, I. 2017. Land-use changes at nest sites of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the South-Moravian region of the Czech Republic. Journal of Landscape Ecology 11. DOI: 10.1515/jlecol-2017-0018.Google Scholar
Porciatti, V., Fontanesi, G. and Bagnoli, P. 1989. The electroretinogram of the Little Owl (Athene noctua). Vision Research 29: 1693–1698.Google Scholar
Porciatti, V., Fontanesi, G., Raffaelli, A. and Bagnoli, P. 1990. Binocularity in the Little Owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings. Brain Behavior Evolution 35: 40–48.Google Scholar
Potier, S., Mitkus, M. and Keler, A. 2020. Visual adaptations of diurnal and nocturnal raptors. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 106: 116–126.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C.M. 1940. Kirkeuglerne og Vinteren. Flora og Fauna 46: 123–126.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C.M. 1957. Massedødsfald blandt kirkeugler (Athene noctua (Scop.)). Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift 51: 40–41.Google Scholar
Pugesek, B.H. 2003. Concepts of structural equation modeling in biological research. In Pugesek, B.H., Tomer, A. and Von Eye, E. (eds.), Structural Equation Modeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 40–57.Google Scholar
Pukinskiy, Yu.B. 1977. Zhizn’ Sov [Life of Owls]. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press, 175–184.Google Scholar
Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132: 652–661.Google Scholar
Purroy, F. 1997. Atlas de las Aves de España 1975–1995. Cerdanyola del Vallès: Lynx Edicions.Google Scholar
Pykal, J., Krafka, Z., Klimes, Z., et al. 1994. Populacni hustota sycka obecneho (Athene noctua) ve vybranych oblastech jiznich Cech [Population density of Little Owl (Athene noctua) in selected regions of Southern Bohemia (Czech Republic)]. Sylvia 30: 59–63.Google Scholar
Qu, Y.-H., Lei, F.-M. and Yin, Z.-H. 2002. A study on genetic polymorphisms within Athene noctua. In Lian, Z.M., Xi, G.S., Huang, Y., et al. (eds.), Animal Science. Xian, Shaanxi: Normal University Press, 189–195.Google Scholar
Quadrelli, G. 1985. Pesenza di fibre vegetali nelle borre di civetta Athene noctua (Scopoli). Picus 11: 69–71.Google Scholar
Quaglietta, L. and Porto, M. 2019. SiMRiv: an R package for mechanistic simulation of individual, spatially-explicit multistate movements in rivers, heterogeneous and homogeneous spaces incorporating landscape bias. Movement Ecology 7 : 11.Google Scholar
Rakhimov, I.I. 1995. Sych domovyi [Little Owl]. In Krasnaya Kniga Respubliki Tatarstan [Red Data Book of the Republic of Tatarstan]. Kazan: Priroda Star, 78–79.Google Scholar
Rakhimov, I.I. and Pavlov, Y.I. 1999. Sych domovyi [Little Owl]. In Khishchnye Ptitsy i Sovy Tatarstana [Birds of Prey and Owls of Tatarstan]. Kazan: Tatpoligraf, 76–78.Google Scholar
Randi, E., Fusco, G., Lorenzini, R. and Spina, F. 1991. Allozyme divergene and phylogenetic relationships within the Strigiformes. The Condor 93: 295–301.Google Scholar
Ravussin, P.-A., De Alencastro, L.-F., Humbert, B., Rossel, D. and Tarradellas, J. 1990. Contamination des oeufs de Chouette de Tengmalm, Aegolius funereus, du Jura vaudois (Suisse) par les métaux lourds et les organochlorés. Nos Oiseaux 40: 257–266.Google Scholar
Regelink, J.R. and Bosch, T. 2007. Grote bosmuis in Winterswijk. Zoogdier 18: 23.Google Scholar
Reichenow, A. 1904 . Die Vögel Afrikas. Vol. 3. Neudamm: Verlag von J. Neumann, 822.Google Scholar
Reinard, M. 1977. Steinkauz zieht seine Jungen in einer Erdhöhle gross. Regulus 12: 234–236.Google Scholar
Reiser, O. 1925. Die Vögel von Marburg an der Drau. Graz: Natuwissenschaftlicher Verein in Steiermark.Google Scholar
Reisinger, L. 1926a. Ein interessanter Fehler am Auge eines Steinkauzes. Biologisches Zentralblatt (Leipzig) 46: 632.Google Scholar
Reisinger, L. 1926b. Hypnose des Steinkauzes. Biologisches Zentralblatt (Leipzig) 46: 630–631.Google Scholar
Retzius, A.J. 1800. Faunae Svecicae a Carolo a Linné egu. Pars Prima. Lipsiae: Apud Siegfried Lebrecht Crusium.Google Scholar
Rheinwald, G. 1993. Atlas der Verbreitung und Häufigkeit der Brutvögel Deutschlands – Kartierung 1985. Schriftenreihe 12. Radolfzell: Deutscher Avifaunisten.Google Scholar
Rich, T.D., Beardmore, C.J., Berlanga, H., et al. 2004. Partners in Flight. North American Landbird Conservation Plan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.Google Scholar
Richetti, F., Vittoria, A., Costagliola, A., De Falco, G. and Lepore, G. 1980. Prime osservazioni istomorfologiche sull’apparatodigerente di alcuni uccelli rapaci diurni (Buteo buteo) enoturni (Athene noctua). Atti della Societa Italiana della Scienze Veterinarie 34: 125.Google Scholar
Ritzel, L. and Wulf, J. 1978. Elstern (Pica pica) attackiert Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Ornithologische Mitteilungen 30: 255.Google Scholar
Robb, M. and The Sound Approach. 2015. Undiscovered Owls. A Sound Approach Guide. Poole: The Sound Approach.Google Scholar
Robiller, F. 1987. Über den Bodenbelag in Bruthöhlen des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Acta Ornitholecologica 1: 299–301.Google Scholar
Robiller, F. and Robiller, F.C. 1992. Gelungene Ansiedlung des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) am Stadtrand von Weimar. Beiträge zur Vogelkunde 38: 1–5.Google Scholar
Robiller, F. and Robiller, M. 1986. Ein Beitrag zur Brutbiologie des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Beiträge zur Vogelkunde 32: 161–174.Google Scholar
Rocamora, G. and Yeatman-Berthelot, D. 1999. Oiseaux Menacés et à Surveiller en France. Paris: Société d’Etudes Ornithologiques de France, Ligue pour le Protection des Oiseaux, 302–303.Google Scholar
Rochon-Duvigneaud, A. 1934. Notes d’ophtalmologie comparée. Les yeux de la Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua). Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 59: 224–226.Google Scholar
Rodts, J. 1994. La faune et le trafic routier. L’Homme et l’Oiseau 2: 109–118.Google Scholar
Roff, D.A. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Rogacheva, E.V. 1988. Ptitsy Srednei Sibiri [Birds of the Middle Siberia]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Rohner, C., Krebs, C.J., Hunter, D.B. and Currie, D.C. 2000. Roost site selection of Great Horned owls in relation to black fly activity: an anti-parasite behavior? Condor 102: 950–955.Google Scholar
Romanowski, J. 1988. Trophic ecology of Asio otus (L) and Athene noctua (Scop.) in the suburbs of Warsaw. Polish Ecological Studies 14: 223–234.Google Scholar
Romanowski, J., Altenburg, D. and Żmihorski, M. 2013. Seasonal variation in the diet of the Little Owl, Athene noctua in agricultural landscape of Central Poland. North-Western Journal of Zoology 9: 131603.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M.L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. American Naturalist 137: 5–28.Google Scholar
Roulin, A. 2016. Evolutionary trade-off between naturally- and sexually-selected melanin-based colour traits in worldwide barn owls and allies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 119: 455–476.Google Scholar
Roulin, A. and Ducrest, A-L. 2013. Genetics of colouration in birds. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 24: 594–608.Google Scholar
Roulin, A., Riols, C., Dijkstra, C. and Ducrest, A. 2019. Female plumage spottiness signals parasite resistance in the barn owl (Tyto alba). Behavioral Ecology 12: 103–110.Google Scholar
Roulin, A., Uva, V. and Romano, A. 2018. A melanin-based trait is more strongly related to body size in the tropics than in temperate regions in the globally distributed barn owl family. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 31:1932–1944.Google Scholar
Rufino, R. 1989. Atlas das Aves que nidifican em Portugal Continental. Lisboa: Centro de Estudos de Migroçoes e Protecçao de Aves. Servicio Nacional de Parques Reservas e Conservaçao da Natureza, 97.Google Scholar
Runte, P. 1951. Zur “kuwitt Frage” (Steinkauz oder Waldkauz?). Ornithologische Mitteilungen 3: 133–136.Google Scholar
Rusch, W. 1988. Zwei Brutnachweise des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in der Nähe eines Waldkauz-Brutplatzes (Strix aluco). Kiebitz 8: 145.Google Scholar
Russow, V. 1880. Die Ornis Ehst-, Liv- und Curlad’s mit besonderer Berucksichtingung der Zug- und Brutverhaltnisse. Dorpat: Arciv f. d. Naturkude Liv-, Ehst- und Kurlands.Google Scholar
Ryabitsev, V.K. 2001. Ptitsy Urala, Priural’ya i Zapadnoi Sibiri [Birds of the Ural, Ural Area and West Siberia]. Ekaterinburg: Uralian University Press.Google Scholar
Ryder, J.P. 1980. The influence of age on the breeding biology of colonial nesting seabirds. In Burger, J., Olla, B.L. and Winn, H.E. (eds.), Behavior of Marine Animals. Boston, MA: Springer, 153–168.Google Scholar
Rydzewski, W. 1978. The longevity of ringed birds. Ring 97: 239.Google Scholar
Ryslavy, T. and Mädlow, W. 2008. Rote Liste und Liste der Brutvögel des Landes Brandenburg 2008. Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege Brandenberg 17: 3–104.Google Scholar
Sageder, G. 1990. Nahrungsspektrum und Mechanismen der Entstehung der Beutewahl beim Steinkauz: eine vergleichende Freiland-und Laboruntersuchung. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades an der Formal und Naturwissenschftalichen Fakultät der Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Sagitov, A.K. 1990. Otryad Sovy Striges. In Ptitsy Uzbekistan [Birds of Uzbekistan]. Vol. 2. Tashkent: FAN, 225–244.Google Scholar
Saino, N., Romano, M., Ambrosini, R., et al. 2012. Longevity and lifetime reproductive success of Barn Swallow offspring are predicted by their hatching date and phenotypic quality. Journal of Animal Ecology 81: 1004–1012.Google Scholar
Šálek, M. 2004. Vyvoj populace sykha obecneho Athene noctua na Ceskobudejovecku a Pisecku. Sluka Holysov 1: 87–88.Google Scholar
Šálek, M. and Lövy, M. 2012 . Spatial ecology and habitat selection of Little Owl Athene noctua during the breeding season in Central European farmland. Bird Conservation International 22: 1–11.Google Scholar
Šálek, M. and Schröpfer, L. 2008. Population decline of the Little Owl (Athene noctua Scop.) in the Czech Republic. Polish Journal of Ecology 56: 527–534.Google Scholar
Šálek, M., Bazant, M. and Żmihorski, M. 2018. Active farmsteads are year-round strongholds for farmland birds. Journal of Applied Ecology 55: 1908–1918.Google Scholar
Šálek, M., Chrenkovà, M., Dobry, M., et al. 2016. Scale-dependent habitat associations of a rapidly declining farmland predator, the Little Owl Athene noctua, in contrasting agricultural landscapes. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 224: 55–66.Google Scholar
Šálek, M., Poprach, K., Opluštil, L., et al. 2019. Assessment of relative mortality rates for two rapidly declining farmland owls in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). European Journal of Wildlife Research 65: 19.Google Scholar
Salikhbaev, H.S., Kashkarov, D.Yu. and Sharipov, A. 1970. [Birds]. In Sultanov, G.S. (ed.), Ecology of Vertebrate Animals of Nuratau Ridge. Tashkent: FAN, 42–99 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Sandstrom, U. 1991. Enhanced predation rates on cavity bird nests at deciduous forest edges – an experimental study. Ornis Fennica 68: 93–98.Google Scholar
Sanmartin, M.L., Alvarez, F., Barreiro, G. and Leiro, J. 2004. Helminth fauna of Falconiform and Strigiform birds of prey in Galicia, Northwest Spain. Parasitol Res 92: 255–263.Google Scholar
Sará, M. and Zanca, L. 1989. Considerazioni sul censimento degli Strigiformi. Rivista Italiana di Ornithologia 59: 3–16.Google Scholar
Saurola, P. 2002. Natal dispersal distances of Finnish owls: results from ringing. In Newton, I., Kavanagh, R., Olsen, J. and Taylor, I. (eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Owls. Canberra: CSIRO Publishing, 42–55.Google Scholar
Saunders, H. 1889. An Illustrated Manual of British Birds. New York: Gurney and Jackson. Original from the New York Public Library.Google Scholar
Savigny, J-C. 1809. Desciption de l’Égypte, ou Recueil des Observations et des Recherches qui ont été Faites en Égypte Pendant l’Expédition de l’Armée Française, Publié par les Ordres de sa Majesté l’Empereur Napoleon le Grand, livr. 23. Système des Oiseaux de L’Égypte et de la Syrie, 287.Google Scholar
Sawitzky, W. 1899. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Baltischen Ornis. Die Vogelwelt der Stadt Riga und Umgegend. Korr.-Bl. Naturforscher-Vereins zu Riga 62: 191–218.Google Scholar
Schaaf, R. 2005. Der Steinkauz von Crespina. Kauzbrief 17: 14–24.Google Scholar
Schaub, M., Ullrich, B., Knötzsch, U., Albrecht, P. and Meisser, C. 2006. Local population dynamics and the impact of scale and isolation: a study on different little owl populations. Oikos 115: 389–400.Google Scholar
Scherzinger, W. 1970. Aktionssystem des Sperlingkauzes (Glaucidium passerinum L.). Zoologica 118: 1–120.Google Scholar
Scherzinger, W. 1971a. Beobachtungen zur Jugendentwicklung einiger Eulen (Strigidae). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 28: 494–504.Google Scholar
Scherzinger, W. 1971b. Zum Feindverhalten einiger Eulen (Strigidae). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 29: 165–174.Google Scholar
Scherzinger, W. 1980. Verhalten und Stimme des Steinkauzes. In Glutz Von Blotzheim, U.N. and Bauer, K.M. (eds.), Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Vol. 9. Wiesbaden: Aula Verlag.Google Scholar
Scherzinger, W. 1986. Kontrastzeichnungen im Kopfgefieder der Eulen (Strigidae)als visuelle Kommunikationsmittel. Annalen Naturhistorischen Museum Wien 89: 37–56.Google Scholar
Scherzinger, W. 1988. Vergleichende Betrachtung der Lautrepertoires innerhalb der Gattung Athene (Strigiformes). Proceedings of the International 100th DO-G Meeting, Current Topics in Avian Biology, Bonn. Wilhelmshaven: Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaf, 89–96.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. 2003. Gewöllenanalyse bei einer Population des Steinkauzes Athene noctua im Grossen Moos, einer intensive genutzen Agrarlandschaft des schweizerischen Mittellandes. Ornithologische Beobachter 100: 117–126.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. 2000. Kuvik. In Haraszthy, L. (ed.), Magyarország Madarai [Birds of Hungary]. Budapest: Mezőgazda Kiadó, 218–219.Google Scholar
Schnurre, O. 1940. Drei Jahre aus dem Leben eines Berliner Waldkauzes. Beiträge zur Fortpflanzungsbiologie der Vögel 16: 84.Google Scholar
Schönn, S. 1980. Käuze als Feinde anderer Kauzarten und Nisthilfen für höhlenbrütende Eulen. Falke 27: 294–299.Google Scholar
Schönn, S. 1986. Zu Status, Biologie, Ökologie und Schutz des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in der D.D.R. Acta Ornitholecologica 1: 103–133.Google Scholar
Schönn, S. 1998. Steinkauz – Athene noctua (Scop., 1769). In Steffens, R., Saemann, D. and Grössler, K. (eds.), Die Vogelwelt Sachsens. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 268–269.Google Scholar
Schönn, S., Scherzinger, W., Exo, K.-M. and Ille, R. 1991. Der Steinkauz. Wittenberg Lutherstadt: Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei, A. Ziemsen Verlag.Google Scholar
Schoop, G., Siegert, R., Galassi, D. and Klöppel, G. 1955. Newcastle-Infektionen beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua), Hornraben (Bucorvus sp.), Seeadler (Haliaetus albicilla) und Rieseneisvogel (Dacelo gigas). Mh. Praktischer Tierheilkunde 7: 223–235.Google Scholar
Schröpfer, L. 1996. Ein Beitrag zur Verbreitung des Steinkauzes Athene noctua (Scopoli) in Westböhemen. Populationsökologie Greifvögel und Eulenarten 3: 361–364.Google Scholar
Schröpfer, L. 2000. Little Owl (Athene noctua). Sylvia 36: 58–60.Google Scholar
Schroth, G. (ed.). 2004. Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Landscapes. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberg, L. 1970. Hilfe unserem Steinkauz. Deutsche Bund für Vogelschutz Jahresheft. Alsdorf: Deutsche Bund für Vogelschutz, 20–23.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberg, L. 1981. Nisthilfen für Steinkauz, Schleiereule und Turmfalken. Ökologie der Vögel 3: 349–353.Google Scholar
Scopoli, G.A. 1769. Athene noctua Annus I-(V) Historico-Naturalis (Annus I Hist.-Nat.) 22. Descriptiones Avium. Lipsiae: Sumtib. Christ. Gottlob Hilscheri.Google Scholar
Sekour, M., Beddiaf, R., Souttou, K., et al. 2011. Variation saisonnière du régime alimentaire de la Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua) (Scopoli, 1769) dans l’extrême Sud-Est du Sahara algérien (Djanet, Algérie). Terre Vie 66: 79–91.Google Scholar
Selmi, E., Ronchetti, G., Zoboli, A. and Conventi, L. 2005. Posatoi di Civetta Athene noctua in un’area rurale della Provincia di Modena. In Mastrorilli, M., Nappi, A. and Barattieri, M. (eds.), Atti I Convegno italiano sulla Civetta. Osio Sotto (BG), 21 Marzo 2004. Grazzano Visconti: Gruppo Italiano Civette, 33–36.Google Scholar
SEO/BirdLife 2002. Catalogo Verano 2002. Madrid: SEO/BirdLife International.Google Scholar
Severinghaus, L.L. 2002. Home-range, movement and dispersal of Lanyu Scops Owls (Otus elegans). In Newton, I., Kavanagh, R., Olsen, J. and Taylor, I. (eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Owls. Canberra: CSIRO Publishing, 58–67.Google Scholar
Severtzov, N.A. 1873. Izvestia Imperskogo Obschestva Liubiteley Estestvoznaniya. Antropologii i Etnografikii, Moskva, 8, pt. 2 115.Google Scholar
Sgorlon, G. 2005. Exitus di Civetta Athene noctua dopo interazione con il Barbagianni Tyto alba. In Mastrorilli, M., Nappi, A. and Barattieri, M. (eds.), Atti I Convegno italiano sulla Civetta. Osio Sotto (BG), 21 Marzo 2004. Grazzano Visconti: Gruppo Italiano Civette, 49.Google Scholar
Shao, M. and Liu, N. 2008. The diet of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in the desert habitats of northwestern China. Journal of Raptor Research 42: 61–64.Google Scholar
Sharrock, J.T.R. 1976. The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland. Berkhamsted: Poyser, 254–255.Google Scholar
Shawyer, C. 1998. The Barn Owl. Chelmsford: Arlequin Press.Google Scholar
Shirihai, H. 1996. The Birds of Israel. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shtegman, B.K. 1960. K biologii domovoga sycha v yuzhnom Pribalkhashie [On the Little Owl biology in southern Pribalkhash’ye (Cis-Balkhash Lake Area)]. Ornitologiya 3: 315–319.Google Scholar
Sick, H. 1937. Morphologisch-funktionelle Untersuchungen über die Feinstruktur der Vogelfeder. Journal of Ornithology 85: 206–372.Google Scholar
Sicona, 2021. Erfolge beim Artenschutz. Wieder über 40 Steinkauzreviere in Luxemburg. SICONA info-newsletter 03/2021.Google Scholar
Siehoff, D. 2011. Augenabnormitäten beim Steinkauz Athene noctua und anderen Eulenarten oder: Sind einäugige Eulen in der Natur überlebensfähig? Eulen-Rundblick, AG Eulen 61: 98–99.Google Scholar
Signoret, F. 2002. La Chouette chevêche Athene noctua en marais Breton Vendéen: inventaire 1999–2000. Gorgebleue 17: 25–30.Google Scholar
Sill, K. and Ullrich, B. 2005. Reproduktive Leistung eines über zwölf Jahre brütend kontrollierten Steinkauzweibchens Athene noctua. Vogelwarte 43: 43–45.Google Scholar
Silva, C.C., Lourenço, R., Godinho, S., et al. 2012. Major roads have a negative impact on the Tawny Owl Strix aluco and the Little Owl Athene noctua populations. Acta Ornithologica 47: 47–54.Google Scholar
Simakin, L.V. 2000. Zimnyaya fauna i naselenie ptits Badkhyza (Yugo-vostochnaya Turkmenia) [Winter fauna and bird population of Badkhyz]. Ornitologiya 29: 87–92.Google Scholar
Simeonov, S. and Delov, V. 1989. Birds of Konyavska Mountain. Sofia, Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 38: 65–81 [In Bulgarian with English summary].Google Scholar
Simeonov, S.D. 1968. Materialen über die Nahrung des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua Scopoli) in Bulgarien Fragmenta Balcanica. Skopje, Musei Macedonici Scientiarum Naturalium 6: 157–165.Google Scholar
Simeonov, S.D. 1983. New data on the diet of the Little Owl (Athene noctua (Scop.)). Bulgaria Ekologiya Sofiya 11: 53–60.Google Scholar
Simeonov, S.D. 1988. A study of the nutritive spectrum of the eagle owl (Bubo bubo L.) in Bulgaria. Ekologiya Sofiya 21: 47–56.Google Scholar
Simmons, W.S. 1971. Eyes of the Night: Witchcraft Among a Senegalese People. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Slana, D. 2000. Čuk Athene noctua. Acrocephalus 21: 90.Google Scholar
Soban, D. 2004. Joannes A. Scopoli–Carl Linnaeus. Correspondence 1760–1775. Proteusova Knjižnica. Ljubljana: Slovenian Natural History Society.Google Scholar
Sokolov, V.Y. and Syroechkovsky, Y.Y. (eds.) 1990. State Nature Reserves of the Caucasus. Moscow: Mysl.Google Scholar
Sokołowski, J. 1953. Owls. Warsaw: National School Publishers [In Polish].Google Scholar
Soler, M. and Soler, J.J. 1992. Latitudinal trends in clutch size in single brooded hole nesting bird species: a new hypothesis. Ardea 80: 293–300.Google Scholar
Solymosy, L. 1951. A kuvik teli költese [Little Owl breeding in winter]. Aquila 56: 242.Google Scholar
Sopyiev, O. 1982. On some adaptations of birds due to the anthropogenic effects on the Kara-Kum desert. In Internationalis Ornithologici, Moscow, August 16–24, 1982. Moscow: Nauka, 1060–1061.Google Scholar
Sosnikhina, T.M. 1950. Khozyaistvennoe znachenie domovogo sycha v usloviyakh polupustyni yuga Armyanskoi SSR [Practical importance of the Little Owl in conditions of semidesert of the south of Armenian SSR]. Proceedings of the Acadmey of Science of Armenian SSR 3: 95–100.Google Scholar
Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland 1987. Atlas van de Nederlandse Vogels. Arnhem: Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland, 318–319.Google Scholar
Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland 2018. Vogelatlas van Nederland. Broedvogels, Wintervogels en 40 Jaar Verandering. Utrecht/Antwerpen: Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland.Google Scholar
Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland 2002. Atlas van de Nederlandse Broedvogels 1998-2000. Nederlandse Fauna 5. Leiden: Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, KNNV Uitgeverij and European Invertebrate Survey-Nederland.Google Scholar
Spangenberg, E.P. and Feigin, G.A. 1936. Ptitsy Nizhnei Syr-Dari i Prilegayushchikh Raionov [Birds of Lower Syr-Daria and Adjacent Regions). Sbornik Tr. Zool, muzeya Moskovskogo Universiteta [Proceedings of the Zoological Museum of Moscow State University] 3: 41–184 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Sparks, T.H., Parish, T. and Hinsley, S.A. 1996. Breeding birds in field boundaries in an agricultural landscape. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 60: 1–8.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.G. 1965. Avian casualties on railways. Bird Study 12: 257.Google Scholar
Spina, F. and Volponi, S. 2008 . Atalante della Migrazione degli Uccelli in Italia. 1. Non-Passeriformi. Rome: Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Istituto Superiore per la protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale.Google Scholar
Stadler, H. 1932. La voix des chouettes d’Europe moyenne. Alauda 4: 271–278.Google Scholar
Stadler, H. 1945. Die Stimmen der mitteleuropäischen Eulen. Vögel Heimat 14 –16: 17–23.Google Scholar
Staggenborg, J. H., Schaefer, M., Stange, C., Naef-Daenzer, B. and Grüebler, M.U. 2017. Time and travelling costs during chick-rearing in relation to habitat quality in Little Owls Athene noctua. Ibis 159: 519–531.Google Scholar
Stahl, D. 1982. Zucht und Auswilderung des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Voliere 5: 178–180.Google Scholar
Stall, F.E. 1904. Ornithologische Notizen. Korrespondenzblatt des Naturforscher-Vereins zu Riga 47: 77–107.Google Scholar
Stam, F. 2003. De overlevingskans en levensverwachting van steenuilen in het werkgebied van de vogelwerkgroep. Stad en Ambt Doesborgh.Athene Nieuwsbrief STONE 8: 9–11.Google Scholar
Stange, C. 1999. Die Steinkäuze kommen. Ornis 4: 29–31.Google Scholar
Stastny, K., Bejcek, V. and Hudec, K. 1996 . Atlas Hnizdniho Rozireni Ptaku v Ceske Republice 1985–1989. Jinocany: H and H, 188–189.Google Scholar
Staton, J. 1947. Little Owl as prey of Tawny Owl. British Birds 40: 279.Google Scholar
Steffen, J. 1958. Chevêches et Friquets. Nos Oiseaux 24: 321.Google Scholar
Steiner, H., Huber, K., Leitner, H. and Ebner, K. 2020. Ein erfolgreiches Schutzprojekt für den Steinkauz im Most- und Traunviertel. ÖKO.L Zeitschrift für Ökologie, Natur- und Umweltschutz 2020-04: 25–30.Google Scholar
Stepanyan, L.S. 1990. Konspekt Ornitologicheskoi Fauny SSSR [Synopsis of the Ornithological Fauna of the USSR]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Stevanović, V. and Vasić, V. (eds.) 1995. Biodiverzitet Jugoslavije sa pregledom vrsta od međunarodnog značaja. Biološki fakultet i Ecolibri, Beograd [Biodiversity of Yugoslavia with Review of the Species of International Significance]. Belgrade: Faculty of Biology and Ecolibri [In Yugoslavian].Google Scholar
Stresemann, E. and Stresemann, V. 1966. Die Mauser der Vögel. Journal für Ornithologie 107: 357–362.Google Scholar
Stroeken, P. and Van Harxen, R. 2003a. Een methode voor de leeftijdsbepaling van steenuiljongen. Athene Nieuwsbrief 7: 33.Google Scholar
Stroeken, P. and Van Harxen, R. 2003b. Broedbiologisch onderzoek 2003 in de Zuidoost-Achterhoek. Athene Nieuwsbrief 8: 29.Google Scholar
Stroeken, P. and Van Harxen, R. 2003c. Verslag van het broedbiologisch onderzoek in de Zuidoost-Achterhoek in 2003. Athene Nieuwsbrief STONE 8: 29–31.Google Scholar
Stroeken, P. and Van Harxen, R. 2003d. Steenuil bereikt leeftijd van 15 kalenderjaren. Athene Nieuwsbrief STONE 8: 12–16.Google Scholar
Stroeken, P. and Van Harxen, R. 2018. Succesvol dubbellegsel bij steenuilen. Uilen 8: 66–74.Google Scholar
Stroeken, P. and Van Harxen, R. 2019. Validatie methodiek leeftijdsbepaling steenuilenjongen. Uilen 9: 74–79.Google Scholar
Stroeken, P. and Van Harxen, R. 2021. Steenuilenjongen gewikt en gewogen. Een verkennende analyse van de conditie van nestjongen in de periode 1998–2021. Uilen 11: 20–37.Google Scholar
Stroeken, P. and Van Harxen, R. 2022. Steenuilen gewikt en gewogen. Uilen 11: 20–37.Google Scholar
Stroeken, P., Bloem, H., Van Harxen, R., Groen, N. and Boer, K. 2001. The Little Owl in the Netherlands: distribution, breeding densities, threats and protection measurements. In Génot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), Chouette Chevêche et Territoires: Actes du Colloque International de Champ-sur-Marne, 25 et 26 Novembre 2000. Ciconia 25: 185–190.Google Scholar
Stroeken, P., Van Harxen, R. and Hallmann, C.A. 2010. Een methode voor het bepalen van de conditie van steenuiljongen. Uilen 1: 40–45.Google Scholar
Struwe-Juhl, B. 2003. Steinkauz: Athene noctua. In Berndt, R.K., Koop, B. and Struwe-Juhl, B. (eds.), Brutvogelatlas. Vogelwelt Schleswig-Holsteins. Band 5. Neumünster: Wachholtz Verlag, 234–235.Google Scholar
Stuart, J. 1977. The Magic of Owls. New York: Walker and Company.Google Scholar
Štumberger, B. 2000. Čuk Athene noctua Acrocephalus 21: 89.Google Scholar
Südbeck, P., Bauer, H.-G., Boschert, M., Boye, P. and Knief, W. 2007. Rote Liste der Brutvögel Deutschlands – 4. Fassung. Hilpoltstein: Nationalen Gremium Rote Liste Vögel.Google Scholar
Sudfeldt, C., Dröschmeister, R., Frederking, W., et al. 2013. Vögel in Deutschland – 2013. Münster: DDA, BfN, LAG VSW.Google Scholar
Sukhinin, A.N., Misonne, G.S. and Zhernov, I.V. 1972. Pitanie domovogo sycha v Turkmenii [The Little Owl feeding in Turkmenia] Ornitologiya 10: 216–227.Google Scholar
Sunde, P. 2021. Bestandsstatus for Danske Kirkeugler 2019–20, Samt Afrapportering af Fodringsprojekt. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet, DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi.Google Scholar
Sunde, P., Mayer, M. Fox, A.D., et al. 2021. Det Biologiske Levegrundlag for Kirkeugler I Danmark [Habitat and Prey Requirements for the Little Owl in Denmark]. Videnskabelig rapport fra DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi. Aarhus: DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi, 444.Google Scholar
Sunde, P., Thorup, K., Jacobsen, L.B., et al. 2009. Spatial behaviour of little owls (Athene noctua) in a declining low-density population in Denmark. Journal of Ornithology 150: 537–548.Google Scholar
Sunde, P., Thorup, K., Jacobsen, L.B. and Rahbek, C. 2014. Weather conditions drive dynamic habitat selection in a generalist predator. PLoS ONE 9: 1–13.Google Scholar
Surina, B. 2000. Čuk Athene noctua. Acrocephalus 21: 90.Google Scholar
Sushkin, P.P. 1938. Ptitsy Sovetskogo Altaya I prilezhashchikh Chastei Severo-Zapadnoi Mongolii [Birds of the Soviet Altai and Adjoining Parts of Northwestern Mongolia]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1–317.Google Scholar
Swindle, K.A., Ripple, W.J., Meslow, E.C. and Schafer, D. 1999. Old-forest distribution around Spotted Owl nests in the central Cascade Mountains, Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 1212–1221.Google Scholar
Swinhoe, R. 1870. On Chinese zoology. Proceedings of the Zoological Society London 1870.Google Scholar
Szép, T., Csörgő, T., Halmos, G., et al. (eds.) 2021. Magyarország madáratlasza. [Bird Atlas of Hungary]. Budapest: Agrárminisztérium, Magyar Madártani és Természetvédelmi Egyesület.Google Scholar
Taczanowski, W. 1882. Polish Birds. Vol. I–II. Cracow: PAU [In Polish].Google Scholar
Tarr, C.L. and Fleischer, R.C. 1993. Mitochondrial DNA variation and evolutionary relationships in the amakihi complex. Auk 110: 825–831.Google Scholar
Tarres, M.A.G., Baron, M. and Gallego, A. 1986. The horizontal cells in the retina of the owl, Tyto alba, and owlet, Carine noctua. Experimental Eye Research 42: 315–321.Google Scholar
Taurinsh, E.A. and Vilks, K.A. 1949. Ornitofauna Latvijskoi SSR. Okhrana prirody [Conservation of Nature] 9: 52–73 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Tayler, A.G. 1944. Little Owl hovering. British Birds 37: 178.Google Scholar
Taylor, I. 1994. Barn Owls: Predator–Prey Relationships and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teixeira, R.M. 1979. Atlas van de Nederlandse Broedvogels. Deventer: De Lange van Leer, 196–197.Google Scholar
Temminck, C.J. 1815. Manuel D’Ornithologie Ou Tableau Systèmatique Des Oiseaux Qui Se Trouvent En Europe. Amsterdam: J.C. Sepp.Google Scholar
Tengmalm, P.G. 1793. Utkast til Uggelflägtets, i fynnerhet de Svenska arternas, Natural Historia. Köngl. Vetenskaps, Academiens nya Handlingar 14: 229–240.Google Scholar
Thévenot, M., Vernon, R. and Bergier, P. 2003. The Birds of Morocco: An Annotated Checklist. BOU Checklist No. 22. Tring: British Ornithologists’ Union and British Ornithologists’ Club.Google Scholar
Thibault, J.-C. 1983. Les oiseaux de la Corse: Histoire et Répartition aux XIXe et XXe Siècles. Paris: Parc Naturel Régional de Corse de Gerfau, 148–149.Google Scholar
Thibault, J.-C. and Bonaccorsi, G. 1999. The Birds of Corsica. An Annotated Checklist. BOU Checklist No. 17. Tring: British Ornithologists’ Union and British Ornithologists’ Club, 64.Google Scholar
Thiollay, J.-M. 1968. Le régime alimentaire de nos rapaces: quelques analyses françaises. Nos Oiseaux 29: 252–253.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.F. 1939. The food of the Little Owl derived from pellets, February 1936 to January 1937. Discovery New Series 2: 94–99.Google Scholar
Thompson, W.L., White, G.C. and Gowan, C. 1998. Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thorogood, R., Ewen, J.G. and Kilner, R.M. 2011. Sense and sensitivity: responsiveness to offspring signals varies with the parents’ potential to breed again. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 278: 2638.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W.H. and Griffin, D.R. 1962. The lack of ultrasonic components in the flight noise of owls compared with birds. Ibis 104: 256–257.Google Scholar
Thorup, K., Pedersen, D., Sunde, P., Jacobsen, L.B. and Rahbek, C. 2013 . Seasonal survival rates and causes of mortality of Little Owls in Denmark. Journal of Ornithology 154: 183–190.Google Scholar
Thorup, K., Sunde, P., Jacobsen, L.B. and Rahbek, C. 2010. Breeding season food limitation drives population decline of the Little Owl Athene noctua in Denmark. Ibis 152: 803–814.Google Scholar
Tillmann, J.E. 2009. Fear of the dark: night-time roosting and anti-predation behaviour in the grey partridge (Perdrix perdrix L.). Behaviour 146: 999–1023.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, L. and Tinbergen, N. 1932. Über die Ernährung einer Steinkauzbrut (Athene noctua visalii A.E. Brehm). Beiträge zur Fortpflanzungsbiologie der Vögel 8: 11–14.Google Scholar
Tischler, F. 1941. Die Vögel Ostpreussens und seiner Nachgebiete 1. Königsberg und Berlin: Ost Europa Verlag, 553–555.Google Scholar
Tome, D. 1996a. Owls in Slovenia: present status and distribution. In Stubbe, M. and Stubbe, A. (eds.), Populationsökologie Greifvogel-und Eulenarten, Vol. 3. Wittenberg: Martin-Luther-Universität Halle, 343–351.Google Scholar
Tome, D. 1996b. Vertical distribution of owls in Slovenia [Višinska razširjenost sov v Sloveniji]. Acrocephalus 17: 2–3.Google Scholar
Tomé, R. 2011. Effects of Habitat Quality on the Abundance, Behaviour and Breeding Performance of Owls: Barn and Little Owls in Agro-Pastoral Landscapes of Southern Europe. Ph.D. thesis, University of Turku.Google Scholar
Tomé, R., Bloise, C. and Körpimäki, E. 2004. Nest-site selection and nesting success of Little Owls (Athene noctua) in Mediterranean woodlands and open habitats. Journal of Raptor Research 38: 35–46.Google Scholar
Tomé, R., Dias, M.P., Chumbinho, A.C. and Bloise, C. 2011. Influence of perch height and vegetation structure on the foraging behaviour of Little Owls Athene noctua: how to achieve the same success in two distinct habitats. Ardea 99: 17–26.Google Scholar
Tomé, R., Santos, N., Cardia, P., Ferrand, N. and Korpimäki, E. 2005. Factors affecting the prevalence of blood parasites of Little Owls Athene noctua in southern Portugal. Ornis Fennica 82: 63–72.Google Scholar
Tomiałojć, L. 1972. Ptaki Polski: Wykaz Gatunków I Rozmieszczenie. [Birds of Poland: List of Species and Distribution]. Warsaw: PWN [In Polish].Google Scholar
Tomiałojć, L. 1976. Birds of Poland [Ptaki Polski]. Warsaw: PWN, 123 [In Polish].Google Scholar
Tomiałojć, L. 1990. Ptaki Polski: Rozmieszczenie i Liczebność. [Birds of Poland: Distribution and Importance]. Warsaw: PWN [In Polish].Google Scholar
Toms, M.P., Crick, H.Q.P. and Shawyer, C.R. 2000. Project Barn Owl Final Report. British Trust for Ornithology, Research Report 197. Thetford: British Trust for Ornithology.Google Scholar
Torregiani, F. 1981. Osservazione dell’accopiamento della civetta, Athene noctua. Gli Uccelli d’Italia 6: 178–179.Google Scholar
Toschki, A. 1999. Bestand und Verbreitung des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua) in Aachen Eulen-Rundblick. AG Eulen 4849: 16–20.Google Scholar
Transehe, N. and Sinats, R. 1936. Latvijas Putni. Riga: Mezu Departamenta Izdevums.Google Scholar
Tricot, J. 1968. A propos de la capture des lombrics par la Chouette chevêche (Athene noctua). Aves 5: 11.Google Scholar
Trontelj, P. 1994. Ptice kot indikator ekološkega pomena Ljubljanskega barja (Slovenija) [The importance of birds as ecological indicators on the Ljubljansko barje (Slovenia)]. Scopolia 32: 1–61.Google Scholar
Tschumi, M., Humbel, J., Erbes, J., et al. 2019. Parental sex allocation and sex-specific survival drive offspring sex ratio bias in little owls. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 73: 85.Google Scholar
Tschumi, M., Scherler, P., Fattebert, J., Naef-Daenzer, B. and Grüebler, M.U. 2020. Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability. Landscape Ecology 35: 2287–2300.Google Scholar
Tucker, G.M. and Evans, M.I. 1997. Habitats for Birds in Europe: A Conservation Strategy for the Wider Environment. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 6. Cambridge: BirdLife International.Google Scholar
Tucker, G.M. and Heath, M.F. 1994. Birds in Europe: Their Conservation Status. Cambridge: Birdlife International, 330–331.Google Scholar
Turner, M. and Gardner, R.H. (eds.) 1997. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogenity. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Turner, M., Gardner, R.H. and O’Neill, R.V. 2003. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ullrich, B. 1970. Ersatzbrut und Mauserbeginn beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Vogelwelt 91: 28–29.Google Scholar
Ullrich, B. 1973. Beobachtungen zur Biologie des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Anzeiger der Ornithologischer Gesellschaft in Bayern 12: 163–175.Google Scholar
Ullrich, B. 1975a. Bestandsgefährdung von Vogelarten im Ökosystem “Streuobstwiese” unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Steinkauz und den einheimischen Würgerarten der Gattung Lanius. Beih. Veröff. Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege Baden-Württemberg 7: 90–110.Google Scholar
Ullrich, B. 1975b. Zu Legeabstand, Brutbeginn, Schlupffolge und Brutdauer beim Steinkauz (Athene noctua). Journal für Ornithologie 116: 324–325.Google Scholar
Ullrich, B. 1980. Zur Populationsdynamik des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua). Vogelwarte 30: 179–198.Google Scholar
Unterholzner, L., Folie, B., Ege, P., et al. 2018. Atlas der Brutvögel Südtirols 2010–2015, Lana. Südtirol, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Vogelkunde und Vogelschutz.Google Scholar
Urios, V., Escobar, J.V., Pardo, R. and Gómez, J.A. (eds.). 1991. Atlas de las Aves nidificantes de la Comunidad Valenciana. Valencia: Generalitat Valenciana.Google Scholar
Uspensky, G.A. 1977. O gnezdovanii pustel’gi obyknovennoi, kobchika i domovogo sycha v gnezdakh vranovykh ptits [On the breeding of Kestrel, Red-footed Falcon and Little Owl in corvid’s nests]. Abstracts of the VII All Union Ornithology Conference. Part 1. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 330–331.Google Scholar
Uttendörfer, O. 1939. Die Ernährung der deutschen Raubvögel und Eulen und ihre Bedeutung in der heimischen Natur. Neudamm: Verlag J. Neumann, 257–266.Google Scholar
Vaassen, E.W.A.M. 2000. Some notes on urban raptors and their habitats in Turkey. International Hawkwatcher 2: 34–38.Google Scholar
Van De Velde, E. and Mannaert, P. 1980. Steenuil (Athene noctua) eet wegslachtoffers. Veldornithologisch Tijdschrift 3: 137–139.Google Scholar
Van den Berghe, K. 1998. Marterachtigen in Vlaanderen. De Levende Natuur 99: 169–170.Google Scholar
Van den Brink, N.W., Groen, N.M., De Jonge, J. and Bosveld, A.T.C. 2003. Ecotoxicological suitability of floodplain habitats in the Netherlands for the little owl (Athene noctua vidalli). Environmental Pollution 122: 127–134.Google Scholar
Van den Burg, A. 2017. Het onderzoeken van niet uitgekomen eieren. Otterlo: Biosphere Science Productions.Google Scholar
Van Den Burg, A., Beersma, P. and Beersma, W. 2003. De temperatuur van nest-en roestplaatsen van de Steenuil Athene noctua. Vogeljaar 51: 147–152.Google Scholar
Van den Tempel, R. 1993. Vogelslachtoffers in het Wegverkeer. Technisch rapport 11. Zeist: Vogelbescherming Nederland.Google Scholar
Van Dooren, A. and Hermsen, C. 2019. FC Uilenbal: een samengesteld gezin. Uilen 9: 68–73.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. 2021. De steenuil. Amsterdam: Atlas Contact.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2001. Prooidierresten bij steenuilbroedsels (2). Athene Nieuwsbrief 5: 18–20.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2003. Prooidierresten bij steenuilbroedsels (3). Athene Nieuwsbrief 7: 19–20.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2005. In het land der blinden. Athene Nieuwsbrief 10: 17–18.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2009. Nieuwe aantalschatting van de Steenuil in Nederland. Athene Nieuwsbrief 14: 43–48.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2010. Reproductie van de Steenuil in Nederland in 2008 en 2009. Uilen 1: 8–13.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2011a. De steenuil. Zeist: Uitgeverij KNNV.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2011b. De prooiaanvoer bij de Steenuil in het vijfde Beleef de Lente-jaar. Uilen 2: 20–23.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2016. Wat krijgen jonge steenuilen op hun bordje? Nieuwsbrief Steenuilenwerkgroep Natuurpunt 13: 1–5.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2019. Wat weegt die muis? Gewichten intacte muizen. Uilen 9: 98–101.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2020a. Niet altijd braaf volgens het boekje. Uilen 10: 106–111.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2020b. Oost west, thuis best of is het gras bij de buren toch groener? Uilen 10: 96–105.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2020c. De dames (en heren) steenuil rond Winterswijk onder de loep. Uilen 10: 62–67.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2021. Male Little Owl (Athene noctua) attempting brood care after loss of nesting female. In Roque, I., Duncan, J. R., Johnson, D. H. and Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 World Owl Conference, Evora, Portugal. Vol. 29. Lisbon: Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves, 477–486.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R. and Stroeken, P. 2022. Een explosie aan vervolglegsels bij de steenuilen in Winterswijk Uilen 11: 74–79.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R., Stroeken, P. Boudewijn, T. and van Turnhout, C. 2023. 50 Jaar Reproductie van de Steenuil in Nederland. STONE Steenuilenoverleg Nederland Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland. 73pp.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R., Stroeken, P. and Sterringa, G. 2018a. Nieuwe gegevens over de eileg, broeden, uitkomst van de eieren en uitvliegen van de jongen bij de steenuil. Uilen 8: 74–88.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R., Stroeken, P. and Sterringa, G. 2018b. Overname broedzorg door man steenuil. Uilen 8: 52–61.Google Scholar
Van Harxen, R., Stroeken, P., Stevens, A.J. and Kwakkel, B. 2017. Steenuilen en parasieten. Uilen 7.Google Scholar
Van Horne, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 893–901.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. 2004. Steenuil. In Vermeersch, G., Anselin, A.,, Devos, K., Herremans, M., Stevens, J., Gabriëls, J. and Van Der Krieken, B. (eds.), Atlas van de Vlaamse Broedvogels 2000–2002. Mededelingen van het Instituut voor Natuurbehoud 23. Brussels: Instituut voor Natuurbehoud, 256–257.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. and Bekaert, M. 2001a. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.), Study of Little Owl Athene noctua habitat preference in Herzele (East-Flanders, Northern Belgium) using the median test. Oriolus 67: 62–71.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. and Bekaert, M. 2001b. In Genot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), Modèle de régression logistique de prédiction de la qualité de l’habitat de la Chevêche d’Athéna (Athene noctua) à Herzele, Flandre Orientale. Ciconia 25: 95–102.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. and Bekaert, M. 2002. An (auto)logistic regression model for prediction of Little Owl (Athene noctua) suitability of landscapes in East Flanders. Evidence for socially induced distribution patterns of Little Owl raptors in the new millenium. In Yosef, R. (ed.), Proceedings of the World Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls, Eilat, Israel 2–8 April 2000. Eilat: International Birding and Research Center, 80–90.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. and Leysen, M. 2001. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.), Habitat typologies of Little Owl Athene noctua territories in Flanders (Northern Belgium). Oriolus 67: 72–83.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. and Leysen, M. 2004. Distribution of Little Owl (Athene noctua) in Flanders (northern Belgium), in relation to environment: spatial modeling through GIS data and logistic regression. In Rodríguez, R.E. and Bojórquez Tapia, L. (eds.), Spatial Analysis in Raptor Ecology and Conservation. La Paz: Centro de INVESTIGACIONES Biologicas del Noroeste/Comision Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, 75–109.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. and Nollet, F. 1991. Biotoopstudie van de Steenuil Athene noctua met behulp van het clusteringsprogramma TWINSPAN. Oriolus 57: 57–61.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Bekaert, M., Steenhoudt, K. and Nollet, F. 2001a. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.), Longitudinal analysis of habitat selection and distribution patterns in Little Owls Athene noctua im Meulebeke (West-Flanders), Northern Belgium). Oriolus 67: 52–61.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Coussens, P. and Nollet, F., 1995. Digital method for recording and analyzing the territory use and activity budget of the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio. In Yosef, R. and Lohrer, F.E. (eds.), Shrikes (Laniidae) of the world: biology and conservation. Proceedings of the West Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology 6: 268–275.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Génot, J.-C. and Johnson, D.H. 2008. The Little Owl: Conservation, Ecology and Behavior of Athene noctua. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.) 2001b. The Little Owl in Flanders in its international context. Proceedings of the Second International Little Owl Symposium, 16–18 March 2001,Geraardsbergen, Belgium. Oriolus 67, Supplement.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Steenhoudt, K. 2001c. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.), Analysis and spatial prediction of Little Owl Athene noctua distribution in relation to its environment in Flanders (Northern Belgium). Oriolus 67: 32–51.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Nollet, F. and Evans, A. 1999. The ecology and conservation of the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio breeding in Europe. Aves 36: 179–192.Google Scholar
Van Orden, C. and Paklina, N.V. 2003. An association between Tibetan Owlets Athene noctua ludlowi and Himalayan Marmots Marmota himalayana in West-Tibet and Southeast Ladakh. De Takkeling 11: 80–85.Google Scholar
Van Veen, J.C. and Kirk, D.A. 2000. Dietary shifts and fledging success in breeding Tawny Owls Strix aluco. Ökologie Vögel 22: 237–281.Google Scholar
Von Wacquant Geozelles, S. 1890. Zur Lebensweise des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua Retz). Ornithologische Monatsschrift 15: 194–202.Google Scholar
Van Zoest, J.G.A. and Fuchs, P.P. 1988. Jaaggedrag en prooiaanvoer van een Steenuil Athene noctua broedpaar. Limosa 61: 105–112.Google Scholar
van’t Hoff, J. 1999. In Groningen gaat de steenuil wel heel hard achteruit. En wat we daaraan denken te gaan doen. Athene Nieuwsbrief 2: 4–9.Google Scholar
van’t Hoff, J. 2001. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.), Balancing on the edge: the critical situation of the Little Owl Athene noctua in an intensive agricultural landscape, Oriolus 67: 100–109.Google Scholar
Vanden Wyngaert, L. 2005. Steenuilproject Dijleland Verslag. Jaarverslag 2004.Google Scholar
Vanden Wyngaert, L. 2017. Anti-marter Buis. Mechelen: Nieuwsbrief Steenuilenwerkgroep Natuurpunt, 18.Google Scholar
Vaurie, C. 1960. Systematic notes on palearctic birds. No. 42 Strigidae: the genus Athene. American Museum Novitates 2015: 1–21.Google Scholar
Veit, W. 1988. Die Bestandsentwicklung zweier Steinkauzpopulationen in den Kreis Limburg-Weilburg, Lahn-Dill und Giessen von 1978–1987. Vogel und Umwelt 5: 87–91.Google Scholar
Velatta, F., Magrini, M. and Lombardi, G. (eds.) 2019. Secondo Atlante Ornitologico dell’Umbria. Perugia: Distribuzione Regionale degli Uccelli Nidificanti e Svernanti, Regione Umbria.Google Scholar
Venables, W.A., Baker, A.D., Clarke, R.M., et al. 2008. The Birds of Gwent. London: Helm.Google Scholar
Vendrig, K. and Groen, N. 2001. De prooiaanvoer van de steenuil in de Gelderse Poort: Onderzoek naar de prooiaanvoer van de steenuil middels videobeelden. Lelystad: RIZA.Google Scholar
Verboven, N. and Verhulst, S. 1996. Seasonal variation in the incidence of double broods: the date hypothesis fits better than the quality hypothesis. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 264–273.Google Scholar
Vercauteren, P. 1986. Reactie op het artikel: “Balts en copulatie bij de Steenuil in November”. Ornis Flandriae 5: 107–108.Google Scholar
Vercauteren, P. 1989. Steenuil Athene noctua. In Vogels in Vlaanderen, Voorkomen en Verspreiding. Brussels: Vlaamse Avifauna Commissie, 248–249.Google Scholar
Verwaerde, J., Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Nollet, F. and Bracquene, J. 1999. Standaardprotocol voor het inventariseren van Steenuilen Athene noctua Scop. (Strigidae) in de West-Europese Laagvlakte. Oriolus 65: 109–114.Google Scholar
Vikstrøm, T. and Moshøj, C. 2020. Fugleatlas-de Danske Ynglefugles Udbredelse 2014–2017. Copenhagen: Dansk Ornitologisk Forening.Google Scholar
Vilkov, E.V. 2003. Status, dinamika chislennosti i osobennosti ekologii sov Dagestana [Status, Number Dynamics and Peculiarities of Ecology of Owls of Dagestan].Google Scholar
Village, A. 1990. The Kestrel. London: Poyser.Google Scholar
Visscher, G. 2022. Twee dames die het samen wel erg lang uithouden. Uilen 11: 64–69.Google Scholar
Visser, D. 1977. De Steenuil-in het Rijk van Nijmegen. De Mourik 3: 13–27.Google Scholar
Vogrin, M. 1997. Little Owl (Athene noctua): a highly endangered species in NE Slovenia. Buteo 9: 99–102.Google Scholar
Vogrin, M. 2001. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Leysen, M. and Leysen, K. (eds.), Little Owl Athene noctua in Slovenia: an overview. Oriolus 67: 132–135.Google Scholar
von Bertalanffy, L. 1934. Untersuchungen über die Gesetzlichkeit des Wachstums. I. Allgemeine Grundlagen der Theorie; mathematische und physiologische Gesetzlichkeiten des Wachstums bei Wassertieren. Arch Entwicklungsmech 131: 613–652.Google Scholar
Von Erlanger, C.F. 1898. Beiträge zur Avifauna Tunesiens. 1. Teil. Journal of Ornithology 46: 377–497.Google Scholar
von Heuglin, M.Th. 1863. Die Ornithologie Nordostafrikas, der Nilquellen- und Küsten-Gebiete des Rothen Meeres und des nördlichen Somali-Landes. Cassel: Verlag von Theodor Fischer.Google Scholar
von Heuglin, M.Th. 1869. Athene noctua spilogastra. Ornithologie Nordost-Afrika’s, der Nil-quellen-und kusten-gebiete des Rothen Meeres under des nordlichen Somal-lande. Cassel: T. Fischer, 11, pl. 4.Google Scholar
von Risenthal, D. 1879. Verkannte und Missachtete: Das Steinkäuzchen. Ornithologische Monatsschrift 4: 119–124.Google Scholar
von Schantz, T.V., Bensch, S., Grahn, M., Hasselquist, D. and Wittzell, H. 1999. Good genes, oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266: 1–12.Google Scholar
Vrezec, A. and Vrh Vrezec, P. 2011. Čuk Athene noctua. Acrocephalus 32: 97–98.Google Scholar
Vrezec, A., Ambrožič, Š., Kobler, A., Kapla, A. and De Groot, M. 2017. Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763) at its terra typica in Slovenia: historical overview, distribution patterns and habitat selection. Nature Conservation 19: 19–1217.Google Scholar
Wahlstedt, J. 1971. Jaktmetod hos minervauggla Athene noctua [Hunting method of Little Owl Athene noctua]. Var Fagelvarld 30: 46–47.Google Scholar
Wails, C.N., Oswald, S.A., Arnold, J.M. and Weidensaul, S. 2018. The best dressed are less stressed: associations between colouration and body condition in a North American owl. Bird Study 65: 505–515.Google Scholar
Walker, C.H., Hamilton, G.A. and Harrisson, R.B. 1967. Organochlorine insecticide residues in wild birds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 18: 123–129.Google Scholar
Walter, G. and Hudde, H. 1987. Die Gefiederfliege Camus hemapterus (Milichidae, Diptera), ein Ektoparasit der Nestlinge. Jounal of Ornithology 128: 251–255.Google Scholar
Walters, M. 2003. A Concise History of Ornithology. New Haven, CT, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wangdi, T. 2015. Four new birds discovered in Bhutan. www.kuenselonline.com/four-new-birds-discovered-in-bhutan/ (accessed April 2023).Google Scholar
Weatherhead, P.J. and Blouin-Demers, G. 2004. Long-term effects of radiotelemetry on Black Ratsnakes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32: 900–906.Google Scholar
Weesie, P.D.M. 1982. A Pleistocene endemic island form within the genus Athene: Athene cretensis nov. spp. (Aves Strigiformes) from Crete. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen B 85: 323–336.Google Scholar
Weger, M. and Wagner, H. 2016. Morphological variations of leading-edge serrations in owls (Strigiformes). PLoS ONE 11: e0149236.Google Scholar
Weimann, R., 1965. Die Vögel des Kreises Paderborn. Schr. R. Paderborn, Heimatverein 3: 1–87.Google Scholar
Weinstein, K. 1989. The Owl in Art, Myth, and Legend. London: Savitri Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Weiserbs, A. and Jacob, J.-P. 2007. Oiseaux Nicheurs de Bruxelles 2000–2004: Répartition, Effectifs, Evolution. Eastbourne: Aves Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Wemer, P. 1910. Etwas vom Steinkauz, Athene noctua (Retz.). Jahresbericht des Westfälischen Provinzial-Vereins für Wissenschaft und Kunst 1911–1912 40: 107–110.Google Scholar
Wetmore, A. 1957. In memoriam: James Lee Peters. The Auk 74: 167–173.Google Scholar
White, G.C. 2000. Population viability analysis: data requirements and essential analyses. In Boitani, L. and Fuller, T.K. (eds.), Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press, 288–331.Google Scholar
Widmer, S. 2011. Roosting Sites of the Little Owl (Athene noctua): Temperature in Roosting Sites During Wintertime. Bachelor thesis. Wädenswil: Zürich University of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
Wilk, T., Chodkiewicz, T., Sikora, A., Chylarecki, P. and Kuczyński, L. 2020. Czerwona lista ptaków Polski. Marki: OTOP.Google Scholar
Willems, F., Van Harxen, R., Stroeken, P. and Majoor, F. 2004. Reproductie van de Steenuil in Nederland in de periode 1977–2003. SOVON-onderzoeksrapport 2004/04. Beek-Ubbergen: SOVON Vogelonderzoek Nederland.Google Scholar
Willughby, F. and Ray, J. 1676. Ornithologiae. Londini: Joannis Martyn.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.C., Ochman, H. and Prager, E.M. 1987. Molecular timescale for evolution. Trends Genetics 3: 241–247.Google Scholar
Wink, M. 2008. Taxonomy and genetics: phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships. In Van Nieuwenhuyse, D., Génot, J.-C. and Johnson, D.H. (eds.), The Little Owl: Conservation, Ecology and Behaviour of Athene noctua. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38–44.Google Scholar
Wink, M. and Heidrich, P. 1999. Molecular evolution and systematics of owls (Strigiformes). In König, C., Weick, F. and Becking, J.H. (eds.), Owls: A Guide to the Owls of the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 39–57.Google Scholar
Wink, M. and Sauer-Gürth, H. 2021. Molecular taxonomy and systematics of owls (Strigiformes): an update. In Roque, I., Duncan, J.R., Johnson, D.H. and Van Nieuwenhuyse, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 World Owl Conference, Evora, Portugal. Vol. 29. Lisbon: Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves, 487–500.Google Scholar
Wink, M., Sauer-Gürth, H. and Fuchs, M. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships in owls based on nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear marker genes. In Chancellor, R.D. and Meyburg, B.-U. (eds.), Raptors Worldwide: Proceedings of the VI World Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls, Budapest, Hungary 18–23 May 2003. Towcester: World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls (WWGBP), 517–526.Google Scholar
Wintle, B.A., Kavanagh, R.P., McCarthy, M.A. and Burgman, M.A. 2005. Estimating and dealing with detectability in occupancy surveys for forest owls and arboreal marsupials. Journal of Wildlife Management 69: 905–917.Google Scholar
Witherby, H.F., Jourdain, F.C.R., Ticehurst, N.F. and Tucker, B.W. 1938. The Handbook of British Birds. London: Witherby Ltd., 322–327.Google Scholar
Witt, K., Bauer, H.-G., Berthold, P., et al. 1996. Rote Liste der Brutvögel Deutschlands. 2. Fassung. Berichte zum Vogelschutz 34: 11–36.Google Scholar
Woodward, I., Aebischer, N., Burnell, D., et al. 2020. Population estimates of birds in Great Britain and the United Kingdom. British Birds 113: 69–104.Google Scholar
Wurm, H. and Paar, J. 2021. Nisthilfen für den Steinkauz im Bezirk Neusiedl am See (Burgenland, Österreich): ein erfolgreiches Artenschutzprojekt. Eulenrundblick 71.Google Scholar
Yeatman, L. 1976. Atlas des Oiseaux Nicheurs de France. Paris: Société Ornithologiques de France, 128–129.Google Scholar
Yew, D.T. 1980. Neuronal cells and types of contacts in the owl’s retina. Anatomischer Anzeiger 147: 255–259.Google Scholar
Yosef, R. 1993. Effects of Little Owl predation on Northern Shrike postfledging success. Auk 110: 396–398.Google Scholar
Yosef, R. 1994. The effects of fence lines on the reproductive success of Loggerhead Shrikes. Conservation Biology 8: 281–285.Google Scholar
Zabala, J., Zuberogoitia, I., Martinez-Climent, J.A., et al. 2006. Occupancy and abundance of Little Owl Athene noctua in an intensively managed forest area in Biscay. Ornis Fennica 83: 97–107.Google Scholar
Zaccaroni, A., Amorena, M., Naso, B., et al. 2003. Cadmium, chromium and lead contamination of Athene noctua, the Little Owl, of Bologna and Parma, Italy. Chemosphere 52: 1251–1258.Google Scholar
Zarei, A., Tabatabaei Yazdi, F. and Rajaee, S. 2021. Dietary niche comparison of raptors in north eastern Iran as important zoogeographic zone. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 5: 1–11.Google Scholar
Zarkhidze, V.A. and Loskutova, E.A. 1999. Dinamika troficheskikh svyazei khishchnykh ptits i melkikh mlekopitayushchikh v severozapadnoi Turkmenii [Relationships between the birds of prey and small mammals in north-western Turkmenistan and their dynamics]. Russkiy Ornitologicheskiy Zhurnal [Russian Journal of Ornithology] 82: 3–17 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Zarudnyi, N.A. 1896. Ornitologicheskaya fauna Zakaspijskogo kraya (Severnoi Persii, Zakaspijskoi oblasti, Khivinskogo oazisa i ravninnoi Bukhary) [Ornithological fauna of Trans-Caspian territory (Northern Persia, Trans-Caspian Region, Khiva oasis and the Plain Bukhara)]. Mat-ly k Poznaniyu Fauny i Flory Ros. Imperii [Materials on the Study of Fauna and Flora of the Russian Empire]. Otdeleniye Zoologie [Department of Zoology] 2: 1–555 [In Russian].Google Scholar
Zav’yalov, E.V., Tabachishin, V.G., Shlyakhtin, G.V., Yakushev, N.N. and Kochetova, I.B. 2000. Sovy Saratovskoi oblasti [Owls of the Saratov Region]. Berkut 9: 73–74.Google Scholar
Zens, K.-W. 1992. Ökologische Studien an einer Population des Steinkauzes (Athene noctua SCOP. 1769) in der Mechernicher Voreifel unter Einbeziehung der radiotelemetrischen Methode. Diplom-Arbeit am Institut für Angewandte Zoologie der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelm-Universität, Bonn.Google Scholar
Zens, K.-W. 2005. Langzeitstudie (1987–1997) zur Biologie, Ökologie und Dynamik einer Steinkauzpopulation (Athene noctua SCOP. 1769) im Lebensraum der Mechenicher Voreifel. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelm-Universität, Bonn.Google Scholar
Zerunian, S., Franzini, G. and Sciscione, L. 1982. Little Owls and their prey in a Mediterranean habitat. Bollettino di Zoologia 49: 195–206.Google Scholar
Zhalakevichius, M., Paltanavichius, S., Shvazhas, S. and Stanevichius, V. 1995. Lietuvos Paukshchiai [Birds of Lithuania]. Acta Ornithologica Lituanica 11 (Special Issue): 112.Google Scholar
Zhao, W., Shao, M.-Q., Song, S. and Liu, N.-F. 2011. Niche separation of two sympatric owls in the desert of northwestern China. Journal of Raptor Research 45: 174–179.Google Scholar
Ziesemer, F. 1981. Zur Situation der Eulen (Strigiformes) in Schleswig-Holstein. Ökologie der Vögel 3: 311–316.Google Scholar
Zuberogoitia, I. 2002. Ecoetologia de las rapaces nocturnas de Bizkaia. PhD thesis. Universidad del Pais Vasco.Google Scholar
Zuberogoitia, I. and Campos, L.F. 1997. Intensive census of nocturnal raptors in Biscay. Munibe 49: 117–127.Google Scholar
Zuberogoitia, I. and Campos, L.F. 1998. Censusing owls in large areas: a comparison between methods. Ardeola 45: 47–53.Google Scholar
Zuberogoitia, I. and Martínez-Climent, J.A. 2001. In Génot, J.-C., Lapios, J.-M., Lecomte, P. and Leigh, R.S. (eds.), The Little Owl in the “Proyecto Noctua”. Ciconia 25: 103–108.Google Scholar
Zuberogoitia, I., Martínez, J.A., Zabala, J. and Martinez, J.E. 2005. Interspecific aggression and nest-site competition in a European owl community. Journal of Raptor Research 39: 156–159.Google Scholar
Zuberogoitia, I., Zabala, J. and Martinez, J.A. 2011. Bias in little owl population estimates using playback techniques during surveys. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 34: 395–400.Google Scholar
Zuberogoitia, I., Zabala, J., Martínez, J.A., et al. 2007. Seasonal dynamics in social behaviour and spacing patterns of the Little Owl Athene noctua. Ornis Fennica 84: 173–180.Google Scholar
Zvářal, K. 2002. Can “Architectural traps” be the cause of the critical decrease of Little Owl (Athene noctua)? Crex 18: 94–99.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H., Bauer, G. and Heusinger, G. 1981. Ökologische Funktionsanalyse Von Feldhecken. Tierökologische Untersuchungen Über Struktur Und Funktion Biozönotischer Komplexe. Schlussber, Lehrstuhl Tierökol, University of Bayreuth. München: Bayer. Landesamt F. Umweltschutz.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×