Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-c7tcl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-13T05:16:13.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on o-Minimality and Variations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2025

Deirdre Haskell
Affiliation:
College of the Holy Cross, Massachusetts
Anand Pillay
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Charles Steinhorn
Affiliation:
Vassar College, New York
Get access

Summary

The article surveys some topics related to o-minimality, and is based on three lectures. The emphasis is on o-minimality as an analogue of strong minimality, rather than as a setting for the model theory of expansions of the reals. Section 2 gives some basics (the Monotonicity and Cell Decomposition Theorems) together with a discussion of dimension. Section 3 concerns the Peterzil-Starchenko Trichotomy Theorem (an o-minimal analogue of Zil'ber Trichotomy). There follows some material on definable groups, with powerful applications of the Trichotomy Theorem in work by Peterzil, Pillay and Starchenko. The final section introduces weak o-minimality, P-minimality, and C-minimality. These are analogues of o-minimality intended as settings for certain henselian valued fields with extra structure.

1. Introduction

This paper is a survey of selected topics in and around o-minimality. The emphasis is on analogies with stability theory, and there is little here on analytic expansions of the reals. On the other hand, there is quite a lot on dimension in o-minimal and related structures. I have concentrated on algebraic examples. Section 2 is introductory, and covers definable functions, cell decomposition, dimension for definable sets, prime models, and definable types. Section 3 is on groups definable in o-minimal theories: there I describe a trichotomy theorem due to Peterzil and Starchenko, and consequences, due to them and Pillay, for definable groups. In Section 4, I leave o-minimality and turn to other settings (weak o-minimality, C-minimality, P-minimality) which are superficially similar, and survey some of the main examples and results.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×