Pending Proceedings in the New Guidelines for Submissions on Enforcement Matters

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316157763.005

4 - Pending Proceedings in the New Guidelines for Submissions on Enforcement Matters

An Improved Regression?

from Part I - Process: NAFTA and NAAEC

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2015

Montserrat Rovalo

Edited by

Hoi L. Kong and

L. Kinvin Wroth

Show author details

Hoi L. Kong: Affiliation:
McGill University, Faculty of Law
L. Kinvin Wroth: Affiliation:
Vermont Law School

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: NAFTA and Sustainable Development
History, Experience, and Prospects for Reform
, pp. 97 - 122

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316157763.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Case concerning Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana v Namibia) [1999] ICJ Rep 1045.Google Scholar

Case concerning the Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Chad), [1994] ICJ Rep 6.Google Scholar

North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, September 14, 1993, in force January 1, 1994, (1993) 32 ILM 1480; Can TS 1994 No 3.Google Scholar

Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with respect to Activities in the Area, Advisory Opinion (February 1, 2011).Google Scholar

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Vienna, May 23, 1969, in force January 27, 1980, 1155 UNTS 331; (1969) 8 ILM 679.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Bringing the Facts to Light: A Guide to Articles 14 and 15 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2000).Google Scholar

Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Guidelines for Submissions on Enforcement Matters under Articles 14 and 15 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (Montreal: Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2013).Google Scholar

SEM-00–004 (BC Logging), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 27, 2001).Google Scholar

SEM-00–006 (Tarahumara), Council Resolution 03–04 pursuant to Article 15(2) (April 22, 2003).Google Scholar

SEM-00–006 (Tarahumara), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 29, 2002).Google Scholar

SEM-01–001 (Cytrar II), Council Resolution 02–13 pursuant to Article 15(2) (December 10, 2002).Google Scholar

SEM-01–001 (Cytrar II), Determination pursuant to Article 14(3) (June 13, 2001).Google Scholar

SEM-01–001 (Cytrar II), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 29, 2002).Google Scholar

SEM-02–003 (Pulp and Paper), Council Resolution 03–16 pursuant to Article 15(2) (December 11, 2003).Google Scholar

SEM-02–003 (Pulp and Paper), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (October 8, 2003).Google Scholar

SEM-02–004 (El Boludo Project), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (May 17, 2004).Google Scholar

SEM-03–003 (Lake Chapala II), Council Resolution 08–01 pursuant to Article 15(2) (May 30, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-03–003 (Lake Chapala II), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (May 18, 2005).Google Scholar

SEM-04–005 (Coal-fired Power Plants), Government of the United States of America Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (September 29, 2005).Google Scholar

SEM-04–005 (Coal-fired Power Plants), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (December 5, 2005).Google Scholar

SEM-05–001 (Crushed Gravel in Puerto Peñasco), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (October 24, 2005).Google Scholar

SEM-05–002 (Coronado Islands), Government of the United Mexican States Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (January 10, 2006).Google Scholar

SEM-05–002 (Coronado Islands), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (January 18, 2007).Google Scholar

SEM-06–003 and SEM-06–004 (Ex Hacienda El Hospital II and Ex Hacienda El Hospital III), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (May 12, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-06–005 (Species at Risk), Council Resolution 10–05 pursuant to Article 15(2) (December 20, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-06–005 (Species at Risk), Government of Canada Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (February 8, 2007).Google Scholar

SEM-06–006 (Los Remedios National Park), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (February 26, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-06–006 (Los Remedios National Park), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (March 20, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-06–006 (Los Remedios National Park), Secretariat Information Request pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (November 27, 2007).Google Scholar

SEM-07–001 (Minera San Xavier), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (June 5, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-07–001 (Minera San Xavier), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 15, 2009).Google Scholar

SEM-07–001 (Minera San Xavier), Secretariat Information Request pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (March 7, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-07–005 (Drilling Waste in Cunduacán), Determination pursuant to Article 14(3) (April 8, 2009).Google Scholar

SEM-07–005 (Drilling Waste in Cunduacán), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (May 15, 2008).Google Scholar

SEM-08–001 (La Ciudadela Project), Government of the United Mexican States Supplemental Response pursuant to Article 21(1)(b) (May 26, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-08–001 (La Ciudadela Project), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 12, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-09–001 (Transgenic Maize in Chihuahua), Government of the United Mexican States Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (May 3, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-09–001 (Transgenic Maize in Chihuahua), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (December 20, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-09–002 (Wetlands in Manzanillo), Notification pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 19, 2013).Google Scholar

SEM-09–003 (Los Remedios National Park II), Government of the United Mexican States Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (December 20, 2010).Google Scholar

SEM-09–003 (Los Remedios National Park II), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (July 27, 2011).Google Scholar

SEM-95–001 (Spotted Owl), Submission pursuant to Article 14 (June 30, 1995).Google Scholar

SEM-96–003 (Oldman River I), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (April 2, 1997).Google Scholar

SEM-97–001 (B.C. Hydro), Council Resolution 98–07 pursuant to Article 15(2) (June 24, 1998).Google Scholar

SEM-97–001 (B.C. Hydro), Government of Canada Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (July 21, 1997).Google Scholar

SEM-97–001 (B.C. Hydro), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (April 27, 1998).Google Scholar

SEM-98–004 (BC Mining), Council Resolution 01–11 pursuant to Article 15(2) (November 16, 2001).Google Scholar

SEM-98–004 (BC Mining), Government of Canada Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (September 8, 1999).Google Scholar

SEM-98–004 (BC Mining), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (June 29, 1998).Google Scholar

SEM-98–005 (Aquanova), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (August 4, 2000).Google Scholar

SEM-98–005 (Cytrar I), Recommendation pursuant to Article 15(1) (October 26, 2000).Google Scholar

SEM-99–001 and SEM 00–002 (Methanex), Determination pursuant to Article 14(3) (June 30, 2000).Google Scholar

SEM-99–001 and SEM 00–002 (Methanex), Government of the United States of America Response pursuant to Article 14(3) (May 30, 2000).Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony. Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRef Google Scholar

Black's Law Dictionary Free Online Legal Dictionary, 2nd ed.Google Scholar

Markell, David. “The North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation After Ten Years: Lessons About Institutional Structure and Public Participation in Governance.” (2004) 26 Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 341–57.Google Scholar

Markell, David. “The Role of Spotlighting Procedures in Promoting Citizen Participation, Transparency, and Accountability.” (2010) 45 Wake Forest Law Review, 425–67.Google Scholar

Pacheco-Vega, Raúl. “Las denuncias ciudadanas sobre cumplimiento ambiental en América del Norte (1996–2012): perspectivas sobre la sociedad civil ambientalista norteamericana.” (2013) 8 NORTEAMÉRICA, 77–108.CrossRef Google Scholar

Solano, Pablo. “Choosing the Right Whistle: The Development of the ‘Environmental Law’ Concept under the Citizen Submission Process,” Chapter 3 of this volume.Google Scholar

Ten-year Review and Assessment Committee. “Ten Years of North American Environmental Cooperation.” Report of the Ten-year Review and Assessment Committee to the Council of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (June 15, 2004).Google Scholar