Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:09:46.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Trust and Risk

Neuroeconomic Foundations of Trust Based on Social Risk

from Part II - Neuropsychological Level of Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2021

By
Nina Lauharatanahirun  and
Jason A. Aimone
Edited by
Frank Krueger
Frank Krueger
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

Interpersonal trust decisions significantly shape our social interactions with others. At its basis, trust decisions can be thought of as an investment of resources in another that involve a degree of uncertainty as to whether such an investment made in a social exchange may be reciprocated or provide future benefits. In this chapter, interpersonal trust behavior is conceptualized as a microeconomic system and empirical support is presented for how interpersonal trust behavior can be thought of as a decision based on social risk. Decision makers face social risk when another person or group of people is the primary source of uncertainty. Arriving at the decision to trust another often involves psychological processes that occur at the cognitive, emotional, and social levels. Such psychological features are often dependent on the environment and institution surrounding the behavior and may give rise to differential preferences and beliefs such as betrayal aversion. We discuss how functional neuroimaging studies play a central role in disambiguating the contribution of such psychological factors to interpersonal trust behavior. We present key neuroeconomic studies that better our understanding of the neural mechanisms that underlie social risk decisions, and present open questions and future directions for research in this area.

Keywords

interpersonal trustsocial riskbetrayal aversionrisktrust fMRI
Type
Chapter
Information
The Neurobiology of Trust , pp. 101 - 123
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. American Economic Review, 101(2), 695–723. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.2.695Google Scholar
Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1998). The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature, 393(6684), 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/30982Google Scholar
Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. (2011). Beneficial betrayal aversion. PLoS ONE, 6(3), Article e17725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017725CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. (2012). What you don’t know won’t hurt you: A laboratory analysis of betrayal aversion. Experimental Economics, 15(4), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683–012-9314-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. (2013). Harnessing the benefits of betrayal aversion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 89, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.02.001Google Scholar
Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. (2016). Neuroeconomics: A flourishing field. In Komlos, J. & Kelly, I. R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economics and human biology. (pp. 649–666). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199389292.013.1Google Scholar
Aimone, J. A., Houser, D., & Weber, B. (2014). Neural signatures of betrayal aversion: An fMRI study of trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1782), Article 20132127. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2127Google Scholar
Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70, 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., & Piankov, N. (2006). Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experimental Economics, 9(3), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683–006-9122-4Google Scholar
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single‐response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9(3), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090304Google Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027Google Scholar
Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/t13084–000Google Scholar
Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008). Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. American Economic Review, 98(1), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.294Google Scholar
Bohnet, I., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2010). Trust and the reference points for trustworthiness in Gulf and Western countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(2), 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.811Google Scholar
Bohnet, I., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). Trust, risk and betrayal. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.004Google Scholar
Butler, J. V., & Miller, J. B. (2018). Social risk and the dimensionality of intentions. Management Science, 64(6), 2787–2796. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2694Google Scholar
Christopoulos, G. I., Tobler, P. N., Bossaerts, P., Dolan, R. J., & Schultz, W. (2009). Neural correlates of value, risk, and risk aversion contributing to decision making under risk. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(40), 12574–12583. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2614-09.2009Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (1990) Foundation of social theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R., Grabowski, T. J., Bechara, A., et al. (2000). Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nature Neuroscience, 3(10), 1049–1056. https://doi.org/10.1038/79871CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunning, D., Anderson, J. E., Schlösser, T., Ehlebracht, D., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036673Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2019). Why people trust: Solved puzzles and open mysteries. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838255Google Scholar
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1996.0081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2004). Is trust a risky decision? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Effron, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2011). Reducing exposure to trust-related risks to avoid self-blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210393532Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2007) Explaining social behavior. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806421Google Scholar
Engelmann, J. B., & Tamir, D. (2009). Individual differences in risk preference predict neural responses during financial decision making. Brain Research, 1290, 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.078Google Scholar
Fairley, K., Sanfey, A., Vyrastekova, J., & Weitzel, U. (2016). Trust and risk revisited. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. (2009). On the economics and biology of trust. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.235Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.106228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetchenhauer, D., & Dunning, D. (2012). Betrayal aversion versus principled trustfulness: How to explain risk avoidance and risky choices in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(2), 534–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetchenhauer, D., Lang, A. S., Ehlebracht, D., Schlösser, T., & Dunning, D. (2020). Does betrayal aversion really guide trust decisions towards strangers? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(4), 556–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2166Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gershoff, A. D., & Koehler, J. J. (2011). Safety first? The role of emotion in safety product betrayal aversion. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/658883Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2001) Conceptions and explanations of trust. In Cook, K. S. (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 3–39). Russell Sage Foundation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610441322.5Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700Google Scholar
Hong, K., & Bohnet, I. (2007). Status and distrust: The relevance of inequality and betrayal aversion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.06.003Google Scholar
Houser, D., Schunk, D., & Winter, J. (2010). Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(1–2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.01.002Google Scholar
Huettel, S. A., Stowe, C. J., Gordon, E. M., Warner, B. T., & Platt, M. L. (2006). Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron, 49(5), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.024Google Scholar
Huster, R. J., Enriquez-Geppert, S., Lavallee, C. F., Falkenstein, M., & Herrmann, C. S. (2013). Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: Functional networks and cognitive contributions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(3), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.001Google Scholar
Jung, W. H., Lee, S., Lerman, C., & Kable, J. W. (2018). Amygdala functional and structural connectivity predicts individual risk tolerance. Neuron, 98(2), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.819Google Scholar
Kim‐Spoon, J., Deater‐Deckard, K., Lauharatanahirun, N., et al. (2017). Neural interaction between risk sensitivity and cognitive control predicting health risk behaviors among late adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(3), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirsch, P., Esslinger, C., Chen, Q., et al. (2005). Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(49), 11489–11493. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3984-05.2005Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Koehler, J. J., & Gershoff, A. D. (2003). Betrayal aversion: When agents of protection become agents of harm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749–5978(02)00518-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koscik, T. R., & Tranel, D. (2011). The human amygdala is necessary for developing and expressing normal interpersonal trust. Neuropsychologia, 49(4), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(7042), 673–676. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03701Google Scholar
Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauharatanahirun, N., Christopoulos, G. I., & King-Casas, B. (2012). Neural computations underlying social risk sensitivity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauharatanahirun, N., Maciejewski, D., Holmes, C., Deater‐Deckard, K., Kim‐Spoon, J., & King‐Casas, B. (2018). Neural correlates of risk processing among adolescents: Influences of parental monitoring and household chaos. Child Development, 89(3), 784–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13036Google Scholar
Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: A network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5–6), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429–010-0262-0Google Scholar
Mikolajczak, M., Gross, J. J., Lane, A., Corneille, O., de Timary, P., & Luminet, O. (2010). Oxytocin makes people trusting, not gullible. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1072–1074. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377343Google Scholar
Mohr, P. N., Biele, G., & Heekeren, H. R. (2010). Neural processing of risk. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(19), 6613–6619. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0003-10.2010Google Scholar
Nave, G., Camerer, C., & McCullough, M. (2015). Does oxytocin increase trust in humans? A critical review of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 772–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615600138Google Scholar
Quercia, S. (2016). Eliciting and measuring betrayal aversion using the BDM mechanism. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 2(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881–015-0021-3Google Scholar
Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & Montague, P. R. (2008). A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(7), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617Google Scholar
Sapienza, P., Toldra‐Simats, A., & Zingales, L. (2013). Understanding trust. The Economic Journal, 123(573), 1313–1332. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12036Google Scholar
Schechter, L. (2007). Traditional trust measurement and the risk confound: An experiment in rural Paraguay. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62(2), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Simmons, A., Matthews, S. C., Stein, M. B., & Paulus, M. P. (2004). Anticipation of emotionally aversive visual stimuli activates right insula. Neuroreport, 15(14), 2261–2265. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200410050-00024Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1982). Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. The American Economic Review, 72(5), 923–955. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1812014Google Scholar
Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2015). Trust: An integrative review from a person–situation perspective. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000046Google Scholar
Tobler, P. N., O’Doherty, J. P., Dolan, R. J., & Schultz, W. (2007). Reward value coding distinct from risk attitude-related uncertainty coding in human reward systems. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97(2), 1621–1632. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00745.2006Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Chin, J. (2007). Feeling duped: Emotional, motivational, and cognitive aspects of being exploited by others. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.127Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Jing, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, C., & Valadez, E. A. (2017). How dispositional social risk-seeking promotes trusting strangers: Evidence based on brain potentials and neural oscillations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(8), 1150–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000328Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. The Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1, Part 2), 453–486. https://doi.org/10.1086/467284Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T. (2011). Trust: The evolutionary game of mind and society. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53936-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 931–959. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.931Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Kolin, E. A., Price, L., & Zoob, I. (1964). Development of a sensation-seeking scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28(6), 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040995Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×