Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:49:16.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Assessing English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2019

Edited by
Christopher J. Hall  and
Rachel Wicaksono
Christopher J. Hall
Affiliation:
York St John University
Rachel Wicaksono
Affiliation:
York St John University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ontologies of English
Conceptualising the Language for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment
 , pp. 163 - 230
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anderson, A., Bader, M., Bard, E. G. et al. (1991). The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech, 34(4), 351–366.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics, Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 923–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1981). A theoretical framework for communicative competence. In Palmer, A. S., Groot, P., and Trosper, G., eds., The Construct Validation of Tests of Communicative Competence (pp. 31–36). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online. Accessed 19 August 2017 from www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2012). Framework of Reference for Pluralistic Approaches. Online. Accessed 10 August 2018 from http://carap.ecml.atGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2018). CEFR Companion Volume. Online. Accessed 7 June 2018 from https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989Google Scholar
Deardorff, D. K. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 149, 65–79.Google Scholar
English Profile. (n.d.). English Profile - What the CEFR Means for English. Online. Accessed 19 August 2017 from www.englishprofile.orgGoogle Scholar
ETS (n.d.). TOEFL iBT® Test Content. Online. Accessed 19 August 2017 from http://www.ets.org/toefl/institutions/about/contentGoogle Scholar
Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., and Falik, L. H. (2010). Beyond Smarter: Mediated Learning and the Brain’s Capacity for Change. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
Gee, J. and Handford, M. (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geranpayeh, A. and Taylor, L. (2013). Examining Listening: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J. (2014). Moving beyond accuracy: From tests of English to tests of ‘Englishing’. ELT Journal, 68(4), 376–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, L. (2012). Accent, listening assessment and the potential for a shared-L1 advantage: A DIF perspective. Language Testing, 29(2), 163–180.Google Scholar
Harding, L. (2015). Adaptability and ELF communication: The next steps for communicative language testing? In Dawadi, S., Mader, J., and Urkun, Z., eds., Selected Proceedings from the IATEFL TEA SIG 2014 Conference. Granada: IATEFL.Google Scholar
Harsch, C. and Martin, G. (2012). Adapting CEF-descriptors for rating purposes: Validation by a combined rater training and scale revision approach. Assessing Writing, 17, 228–250.Google Scholar
Harsch, C. and Poehner, M. (2016). Enhancing student experience abroad: The potential of dynamic assessment to develop student interculturality. Language and Intercultural Communication, 16(3), 470–490.Google Scholar
Harsch, C., Pant, H. A., and Köller, O., eds. (2010). Calibrating Standards-Based Assessment Tasks for English as a First Foreign Language. Standard-setting Procedures in Germany. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Harsch, C., Ushioda, E., and Ladroue, C. (2017). Investigating the Predictive Validity of TOEFL iBT® Scores and Their Use in Informing Policy in a UK University Setting. ETS Research Monograph. Princeton: ETS.Google Scholar
IELTS. (2015). Ensuring quality and fairness in international language testing. Online. Accessed 21 August 2017 from www.ielts.org/-/media/publications/quality-and-fairness/quality-and-fairness-2015-uk.ashx?la=enGoogle Scholar
IELTS. (2017). Speaking band decriptors. Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.takeielts.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/IELTS_Speaking_band_descriptors.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J., Cogo, A., and Dewey, M. (2011). Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching, 44(3), 281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. and Elder, C. (2009). Understanding aviation English as a lingua franca. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 23.1–23.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. and Poehner, M. (2004). Dynamic Assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 , 49–74.Google Scholar
Little, D. and Erickson, G. (2015). Learner identity, leaner agency and the assessment of language proficiency. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 120–139.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (2012). Language Assessments as Shibboleths: A Poststructuralist Perspective. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson. (2017). PTE General. Specification. Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.pearsonpte.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/PTE-General-Specification-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269–282.Google Scholar
Rupp, A. A., Vock, M., Harsch, C., and Köller, O. (2008). Developing Standards-based Assessment Tasks for English as a First Foreign Language – Context, Processes and Outcomes in Germany. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Said, H. (2011). Phraseology: Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers Phraseology Study. Montreal: International Air Transport Association.Google Scholar
Trinity College London. (2016). Exam Information: Graded Examinations in Spoken English (GESE). Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.trinitycollege.com/resource/?id=5755Google Scholar
Trinity College London. (n.d.). Online. Accessed 22 August 2017 from www.trinitycollege.com/site/?id=3108Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. In Hanfmann, E. and Vakar, G., eds. and trans. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wicaksono, R. (2012). Raising students’ awareness of the construction of communicative (in)competence in international classrooms. In Ryan, J., ed., Cross Cultural Teaching and Learning for Home and International Students: Internationalisation of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

ALC. (2006). Standard speaking tests. Available online from www.alc.co.jp/edusys/sst/english.htmlGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonk, W. J. and Ockey, G. J. (2003). A many-facet Rasch analysis of the second language group oral discussion task. Language Testing, 20(1), 89–110.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (2006). Candidate discourse in the revised IELTS Speaking Test. IELTS Research Report, 6, 71–89.Google Scholar
Cambridge English. (2008). Cambridge Preliminary English Test: Official Examination Papers from University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (PET Practice Tests). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cambridge English. (2009). Cambridge First Certificate in English: Official Examination Papers from University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (FCE Practice Tests). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cambridge English. (2018a). Cambridge English First (FCE). Available online from www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams-and-tests/first/Google Scholar
Cambridge English. (2018b). Grade statistics. Available online from http://gradestatistics.cambridgeenglish.org/2016/fce.htmlGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 229–242.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eiken Foundation of Japan. (2014) TEAP Speaking rating scales. Available online from www.eiken.or.jp/teap/construct/sp_rating_crit.htmlGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 399–423.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2018). Rethinking the Second Language Listening Test: From Theory to Practice. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Galaczi, E. D. and Taylor, L. (2018). Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 219–236.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A (2000). Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Geranpayeh, A. and Taylor, L., eds. (2013). Examining Listening: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Listening. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Issacs, T. (2008). Towards defining a valid assessment criterion of pronunciation proficiency in non-native English speaking graduate students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 555–580.Google Scholar
Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., and O’Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 24–29.Google Scholar
Jaiyote, S. (2016). The relationship between test-takers’ first language, listening proficiency and their performance on paired speaking tests. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Bedfordshire.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (1997). Testing pronunciation in communicative exams. In M. Vaughan-Rees, ed., A Special Issue of Speak Out! Bringing Together the Interests of the IATEFL Pronunciation and Testing Sigs, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khalifa, H. and Weir, C. J. (2009). Examining Reading: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Reading. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
May, L. (2011). Interaction in a Paired Speaking Test. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L., ed., Educational Measurement, 3rd ed. London and New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241–256.Google Scholar
MEXT. (2008). The course of study for upper secondary school. Available online from www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/new-cs/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Nakatsuhara, F. (2012). The relationship between test-takers’ listening proficiency and their performance on the IELTS Speaking Test. In Taylor, L. and Weir, C. J., eds., IELTS Collected Papers 2: Research in Reading and Listening Assessment (pp. 519–573). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nakatsuhara, F. (2014). A research report on the development of the Test of English for Academic Purposes (TEAP) Speaking Test for Japanese university entrants – Study 1 and Study 2. Available online from www.eiken.or.jp/teap/group/pdf/teap_speaking_report1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nakatsuhara, F. and Jaiyote, S. (2015). Exploring the impact of test-takers’ L1 backgrounds on paired speaking test performance: How do they perform in shared and non-shared L1 pairs? Paper presented at the BAAL/CUP Applied Linguistics Seminar. York St John University, 24–26 June 2015.Google Scholar
National Centre for University Entrance Examinations. (2017). Transition in the number of applicants. Available online from www.dnc.ac.jp/data/suii/suii.htmlGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, B. (2011). Introduction – Professionalisation, localisation and fragmentation in language testing. In O’Sullivan, B., ed., Language Testing: Theory and Practice (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Palgrave.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, B. and Dunlea, J. (2015). Aptis Genearal Techinical Manual Ver 1.0 TR/2015/005. Available online from www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/aptis_general_technical_manual_v-1.0.pdfGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, B. and Weir, C. J. (2011). Test development and validation. In O’Sullivan, B., ed., Language Testing: Theories and Practices (pp. 13–32). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Post, B. (2011). Using acoustic analysis software to analyse L2 pronunciation features. Paper presented at the 3rd BAALTEASIG Conference. University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. and Egbert, M. (2006). The interactional organisation of the IELTS Speaking Test. IELTS Research Report, 6, 161–205.Google Scholar
Sewell, A. (2013). Language testing and international intelligibility: A Hong Kong case study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(4), 423–443.Google Scholar
Shaw, S. D. and Weir, C. J. (2007). Examining Writing: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Writing. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tanaka, C. (2018, June 13). Private-sector test results to account for 20% of national university English entrance exam scores. The Japan Times. Available online from www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/06/13/national/private-sector-test-results-account-20-national-university-english-entrance-exam-scores/#.W5aI8uhKhAkGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. (2006). The changing landscape of English: Implications for English language assessment. ELT Journal, 60(1), 51–60.Google Scholar
Taylor, L., ed. (2011). Examining Speaking: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Speaking. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsuzuki, M. and Nakamura, S. (2009). Intelligibility assessment of Japanese accents. In Hoffmann, T. and Siebers, L., eds., World Englishes: Problems, Properties and Prospects (pp. 239–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Weir, C. J. (2005). Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-Based Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R. (2011). Interactional Competence in Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing. In Hinkel, E., ed., Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning Volume II (pp. 426–443). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). In Holquist, M., ed. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., trans. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, B. (2017). Response to Ward (2017, 19 May). Exclusive: More Sats ‘chaos’ as two thirds of moderators fail to assess pupils’ work correctly. Times Educational Supplement. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-more-sats-chaos-two-thirds-moderators-fail-assess-pupilsGoogle Scholar
Busby, E. (2018, 18 May). ‘Worrying decline’ in pupils choosing English at A level. The Independent. Available from https://edition.independent.co.uk/editions/uk.co.independent.issue.250518/data/8368091/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., ed. (1991). Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum: The LINC Reader. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Davies, C. (2017). Sats tests for seven-year-olds in England set to be scrapped. The Guardian. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.theguardian.com/education/2017/mar/30/national-sats-tests-for-seven-year-olds-set-to-be-scrappedGoogle Scholar
Department for Education and Skills. (2006). Primary National Strategy: Primary Framework for Literacy and Mathematics. Norwich: OPSI.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (2015). Policy Paper: 2010 to 2015 government policy: school and college qualifications and curriculum. Online. Accessed 1 August 2017 from www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-school-and-college-qualifications-and-curriculum/2010-to-2015-government-policy-school-and-college-qualifications-and-curriculumGoogle Scholar
Dombey, H. (2008). The simple view of reading – Explained. Online. Accessed August 2017. www.teachingtimes.com/news/the-simple.htmGoogle Scholar
Eaglestone, R. and Kovesi, S. (2013, 31 October). English: Why the discipline may not be ‘too big to fail”. Times Higher Education.Google Scholar
Gillen, J. (2014). Digital Literacies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goddard, A. and Beard, A. (2007). As Simple as ABC? Issues of transition for students of English Language A Level going on to study English language/linguistics in higher education. Report Series 14. The Higher Education Academy English Subject Centre.Google Scholar
Goddard, A. and Carey, N. (2017). Discourse: The Basics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, M. and Martin, N. (1988). The Word for Teaching Is Learning: Essays for James Britton. NATE. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Mansell, W. (2017). Battle on the adverbials front: Grammar advisers raise worries about Sats tests and teaching. The Guardian. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.theguardian.com/education/2017/may/09/fronted-adverbials-sats-grammar-test-primaryGoogle Scholar
Ofsted, . (2013). Improving literacy: Moving English forward. Ofsted Schools Survey Reports. Online. Accessed September 2017 from www.gov.uk/government/publications/moving-english-forwardGoogle Scholar
Parliament Education Select Committee Report on Primary Assessment. Online. Accessed August 2017 from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/682/68202.htmGoogle Scholar
Perera, K. (1984). Children’s Writing and Reading: Analysing Classroom Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Richmond, J. (2015). Reading 3 to 7. English Language and Literacy 3 to 19: Principles and Proposals. Leicester: UKLA and Owen Education.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. (2016). How to engage an audience? Good conjunctions and suffixes. [Irony alert]. Online. Accessed August 2017 from http://michaelrosenblog.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/how-to-engage-audience-good.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rosenkvist,  M. (2010). Using student test results for accountability and improvement: A literature review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 54. Paris: OECD Publishing. Online. Accessed August 2017 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km4htwzbv30-enGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D. (1976). Toward an interactive model of reading. Technical Report No. 56. San Diego, CA: Center for Human Information Processing, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Russell Group. (2016). Subject choices at school and college. Online. Accessed August 2017 from http://russellgroup.ac.uk/for-students/school-and-college-in-the-uk/subject-choices-at-school-and-college/Google Scholar
Ward, H. (2017). More Sats ‘chaos’ as two thirds of moderators fail to assess pupils’ work correctly. Times Educational Supplement online. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-more-sats-chaos-two-thirds-moderators-fail-assess-pupilsGoogle Scholar
Weale, S. (2017). More primary school children suffering stress from Sats, survey finds. The Guardian. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.theguardian.com/education/2017/may/01/sats-primary-school-children-suffering-stress-exam-timeGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, K. (2016). Top adviser calls for a rethink over ‘really demanding’ grammar test for 11-year-olds. Times Educational Supplement. Online. Accessed August 2017 from www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/exclusive-top-adviser-calls-rethink-over-really-demanding-grammarGoogle Scholar
Wyse, D. (2017). Evidence given to the Parliamentary Education Select Committee: Primary Assessment, 3: Design and Development, Writing, para 34. Online. Accessed 31 July 2019 from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/682/682.pdfGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×