Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:02:54.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part 5 - The Partial Organization of Formal Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2019

Edited by
Göran Ahrne  and
Nils Brunsson
Göran Ahrne
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Nils Brunsson
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

The idea of partial organization has not been fully explored. Relatively little attention has been paid to organization within organizations or to the possibility of partial de-organization. We explore this possibility in the context of business firms for which innovation and strategic renewal are imperatives. The firm’s top management created conditions for autonomous action in the form of a dedicated internal development program for strategic renewal. Thus, it attempted to partially deconstruct its organizational hierarchy and other elements of its decided order. Employees from all over the organization were invited to participate in the program and to present proposals for new strategic initiatives. The contribution of the paper is in the introduction of the concept of partial de-organizing and in the argument that partial organization is also observable within, and not just without, the boundaries of formal organizations.

Keywords

autonomyhierarchyauthorityinnovationorganizingparadoxpartial de-organizationprocessself-organizationstrategic renewalinternational organizationsmeta-organizationsinternational relationsmembershipstatesdecisionhypocrisypartial organizationUnited NationsEuropean UnionWorld Bank
Type
Chapter
Information
Organization outside Organizations
The Abundance of Partial Organization in Social Life
 , pp. 357 - 418
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ahrne, G., Aspers, P., & Brunsson, N. (2015) The Organization of Markets. Organization Studies 36(1): 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrne, G. & Brunsson, N. (2011) Organization outside Organizations: The Significance of Partial Organization. Organization 18(1): 83–104.Google Scholar
Barberio, V., Höllerer, M. A., Meyer, R. E., & Jancsary, D. (2018) Organizational Boundaries in Fluid Forms of Production: The Case of Apache Open-source Software. In Ringel, L., Hiller, P., & Zietsma, C. (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Toward Permeable Boundaries of Organizations?, vol. 57. Bingley, UK: Emerald. 139–68.Google Scholar
Beck, N., Bru, J., & Woywode, M. (2008) Momentum or Deceleration? Theoretical and Methodological Reflections on the Analysis of Organizational Change. Academy of Management Journal 51(3): 413–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, M. J. & Tushman, M. L. (2003) Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review 28(2): 238–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, L. J. (1981) On the Measurement of Organizational Slack. Academy of Management Review 6(1): 29–39.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012) The Dynamics of Standardization: Three Perspectives on Standards in Organization Studies. Organization Studies 33(5–6): 613–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgelman, R. A. (1983) A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 28(2): 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgelman, R. A. (1991) Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research. Organization Science 2(3): 239–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contino, C. & den Hond, F. (2009) Sense and Sensibility in Managerial Advice. In Buono, A. F. (ed.), Emerging Trends and Issues in Management Consulting: Consulting as a Janus-Faced Reality. Volume 9. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing. 207–38.Google Scholar
Davila, T. & Epstein, M. (2014) The Innovation Paradox. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
de Rond, M. (2014) The Structure of Serendipity. Culture and Organization 20(5): 342–58.Google Scholar
Dougherty, D. & Hardy, C. (1996) Sustained Product Innovation in Large, Mature Organizations: Overcoming Innovation-to-Organization Problems. Academy of Management Journal 39(5): 1120–53.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1989) The Cement of Society. A Survey of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farson, R. & Keyes, R. (2003) The Innovation Paradox: The Success of Failure, the Failure of Success. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Galunic, D. C. & Rodan, S. (1998) Resource Recombinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and the Potential for Schumpeterian Innovation. Strategic Management Journal 19(12): 1193–201.Google Scholar
Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., & Van De Ven, A. H. (2013) Perspectives on Innovation Processes. Academy of Management Annals 7(1): 775–819.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004) The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 47(2): 209–26.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. & Birkinshaw, J. (2007) The Innovation Value Chain. Harvard Business Review 85(6): 121–30.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. M. & Clark, K. B. (1990) Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 9–30.Google Scholar
March, J. G. & Simon, H. A. (1993 [1958]) Organizations. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morgeson, F. P. & Humphrey, S. E. (2006) The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and Validating a Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and the Nature of Work. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(6): 1321–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, J. (2008) The Innovation Paradox. Retrieved 1 November 2016 from http://innovateonpurpose.blogspot.fi/2008/10/innovation-paradox.html.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. & Bettis, R. A. (1986) The Dominant Logic. A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance. Strategic Management Journal 7(6): 485–501.Google Scholar
Rouleau, L. & Balogun, J. (2011) Middle Managers, Strategic Sensemaking, and Discursive Competence. Journal of Management Studies 48(5): 953–83.Google Scholar
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009) A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity’s Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies 46(5): 864–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripsas, M. (2009) Technology, Identity, and Inertia through the Lens of ‘The Digital Photography Company’. Organization Science 20(2): 441–60.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. & Chia, R. (2002) On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change. Organization Science 13(5): 567–82.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. & Nadler, D. (1986) Organizing for Innovation. California Management Review 28(3): 74–92.Google Scholar
Välikangas, L. & Gibbert, M. (2005) Boundary-Setting Strategies for Escaping Innovation Traps. Sloan Management Review 15 April 2005.Google Scholar
Välikangas, L. & Gibbert, M. (2016) Strategic Innovation: The Definitive Guide to Outlier Strategies. Harlow: Pearson FT Press.Google Scholar
Volberda, H. W., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Mihalache, O. R. (2014) Advancing Management Innovation: Synthesizing Processes, Levels of Analysis, and Change Agents. Organization Studies 35(9): 1245–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuori, T. O. & Huy, Q. N. (2015) Distributed Attention and Shared Emotions in the Innovation Process: How Nokia Lost the Smartphone Battle. Administrative Science Quarterly DOI:2010.1177/0001839215606951.Google Scholar

References

Abbott, K. & Snidal, D. (1998) Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(1): 3–32.Google Scholar
Ahrne, G. (1994) Social Organizations: Interaction inside, outside, and between Organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
Ahrne, G. & Brunsson, N. (2005) Organizations and Meta-Organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management 21(4): 429–49.Google Scholar
Ahrne, G. & Brunsson, N. (2008) Meta-Organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ahrne, G. & Brunsson, N. (2011) Organization outside Organizations: The Significance of Partial Organization. Organization 18(1): 83–104.Google Scholar
Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Kerwer, D. (2016) The Paradox of Organizing States: A Meta-Organization Perspective on International Organizations. Journal of International Organizations Studies 7(1): 5–24.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J. (2001) Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J. & Meunier, S. (2009) The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 13–24.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. N. (2002) Eyewitness to a Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. N. & Finnemore, M. (1999) The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53(4): 699–732.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. N. & Finnemore, M. (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, H. & Dumez, H. (2015) La dynamique des dispositifs d´action collective entre firmes: le cas des méta-organisations dans le secteur pétrolier. L´Année sociologique 65(2): 333–56.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. & Siebenhüner, B. (2009) Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biersteker, T. J. & Weber, C. (1996) State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boli, J. & Thomas, G. M. (1999) INGOs and the Organization of World Culture. In Boli, J. and Thomas, G. M. (eds.), Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 13–49.Google Scholar
Borrás, S. & Jacobsson, K. (2004) The Open Method of Co-Ordination and New Governance Patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 11(2): 185–208.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. (2007) Organized Hypocrisy. In Brunsson, N. (ed.), The Consequences of Decision-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 111–34.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. & Jacobsson, B. (2000) A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brütsch, C. & Lehmkuhl, D. (eds.) (2007) Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carreau, D. (1994) Why Not Merge the International Monetary Fund (IMF) with the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank)? Fordham Law Review 62(7): 1989–2000.Google Scholar
Checkel, J. T. (2005) International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization 59(3): 801–26.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, J. M. (2010) Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Codding, G. A. & Rutkowski, A. M. (1982) The International Telecommunication Union in a Changing World. Dedham: Artech House.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. and Jacobson, H. K. (eds.) (1973) The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organization. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, N. (2009) The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case. International Organization 63(1): 33–65.Google Scholar
Drezner, D. W. (2009) The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 65–70.Google Scholar
Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (2006) Introduction. In Drori, G. S., Meyer, J.W., & Hwang, H. (eds.), Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. 1–22.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (2006) Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. C. (2010) The Organizational Turn in International Organization Theory. Journal of International Organizations Studies 1(1): 11–28.Google Scholar
Finke, D., Koenig, T., Proksch, S. O., & Tsebelis, G. (2012) Reforming the European Union: Realizing the Impossible. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
The Globe and Mail (2011) www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canada-formally-abandons-kyoto-protocol-on-climate-change/article4180809/Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., & Slaughter, A.-M (eds.) (2001) Legalization and World Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grant, R. W. & Keohane, R. O. (2005) Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. American Political Science Review 99(1): 29–43.Google Scholar
Hatch, M. J. (2011) Organizations: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (eds.) (2006) Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidenreich, M. & Zeitlin, J. (2009) Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hill, C. & Smith, M. (2011) International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hix, S. & Høyland, B. K. (2011) The Political System of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hülsse, R. & Kerwer, D. (2007) Global Standards in Action: Insights from Anti-Money Laundering Regulation. Organization 14(5): 625–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, I. (2008) Myths of Membership: The Politics of Legitimation in UN Security Council Reform. Global Governance 14(2): 199–217.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, B. & Sundström, G. (2006) Från hemvävd till invävd: europeiseringen av svensk förvaltning och politik. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. (2002) The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy. In Keohane, R. O. (ed.), Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. London: Routledge. 219–44.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., Macedo, S., & Moravcsik, A. (2009) Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism. International Organization 63(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Kerwer, D. (2013) International Organizations as Meta-Organizations: The Case of the European Union. Journal of International Organizations Studies 4 (Special Issue: Sociological Perspectives on International Organizations and the Construction of Global Order): 40–52.Google Scholar
Koch, M. (2009) Autonomization of IGOs. International Political Sociology 3(4): 431–48.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. (1983) International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, D. A. (2003) The New Sovereignty in International Relations. International Studies Review 5(3): 303–23.Google Scholar
Lake, D. A. (2009) Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (2001) The Market System: What It Is, How It Works, and What to Make of It. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindley-French, J. (2007) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization: The Enduring Alliance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipson, M. (2007) Peacekeeping: Organized Hypocrisy? European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. ([1964]1976) Funktion und Folgen formaler Organisation. Berlin: Duncker & Humblodt.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2000) Organisation und Entscheidung. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Malone, D. M. (2007) Security Council. In Weiss, T. G. & Daws, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 117–35.Google Scholar
March, J. G. & Simon, H. A. ([1958]1993) Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994) The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19(3): 5–49.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997) World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 144–81.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Drori, G. S., & Hwang, H. (2006) World Society and the Proliferation of Formal Organization. In Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (eds.), Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 25–49.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. & Jepperson, R. L. (2000) The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory 18(1): 100–20.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mörth, U. (ed.) (2004) Soft Law in Governance and Regulation: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ness, G. D. & Brechin, S. R. (1988) Bridging the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations. International Organization 42(2): 245–73.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S. & Gehring, T. (2011) Institutional Interaction: Ten Years of Scholarly Development. In Oberthür, S. & Schram Stokke, O. (eds.), Managing Institutional Complexity. Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change. Boston: MIT Press. 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittberger, V., Zangl, B., & Kruck, A. (2011) International Organization: Polity, Politics and Policies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Schäfer, A. (2006) A New Form of Governance? Comparing the Open Method of Co-ordination to Multilateral Surveillance by the IMF and the OECD. Journal of European Public Policy 13(1): 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2003) The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S., & Knobel, H. (2006) International Socialization in Europe: European Organizations, Political Conditionality, and Democratic Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R., Gerald, F. D. (2007) Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open System Perspectives. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
Shanks, C., Jacobson, H. K., & Kaplan, J. H. (2009) Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981–1992. International Organization 50(4): 593–627.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. ([1945]1997) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Steffek, J. (2010) Public Accountability and the Public Sphere of International Governance. Ethics & International Affairs 24(1): 45–68.Google Scholar
Trondal, J. (2010) An Emergent European Executive Order. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trondal, J., Marcussen, M, Larsson, T. & Veggeland, F. (2010) Unpacking International Organizations: The Dynamics of Compound Bureaucracies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Usherwood, S. & Starting, N. (2013) Euroscepticism as a Persistent Phenomenon. Journal of Common Market Studies 51(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Vifell, Å. (2006) Enklaver i staten. Internationalisering, demokrati och den svenska statsförvaltningen. Stockholm Studies in Politics 113. Stockholm University: Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Waltz, K. N. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Warren, M. (2001) Democracy and Association. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. (2008) Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wessels, W. (1997) An Ever Closer Fusion? A Dynamic Macropolitical View on Integration Processes. Journal of Common Market Studies 35(2): 267–99.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2004) Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems. Government and Opposition 39(2): 260–87.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×