Book contents
- Paul and Secular Singleness in 1 Corinthians 7
- Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series
- Society For New Testament Studies Monograph Series
- Paul and Secular Singleness in 1 Corinthians 7
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction and Methodology
- 2 The Demographic Shape of Secular Singleness
- 3 The Ideological Shape of Secular Singleness
- 4 The Context of 1 Corinthians 7
- 5 The Crux of 1 Corinthians 7
- 6 The Content of 1 Corinthians 7
- 7 Findings and Conclusions
- Appendix Individuals from the Egyptian Census Classified by Age
- Bibliography
- Ancient Sources Index
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2024
Book contents
- Paul and Secular Singleness in 1 Corinthians 7
- Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series
- Society For New Testament Studies Monograph Series
- Paul and Secular Singleness in 1 Corinthians 7
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction and Methodology
- 2 The Demographic Shape of Secular Singleness
- 3 The Ideological Shape of Secular Singleness
- 4 The Context of 1 Corinthians 7
- 5 The Crux of 1 Corinthians 7
- 6 The Content of 1 Corinthians 7
- 7 Findings and Conclusions
- Appendix Individuals from the Egyptian Census Classified by Age
- Bibliography
- Ancient Sources Index
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Paul and Secular Singleness in 1 Corinthians 7 , pp. 287 - 316Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Primary Sources
Antipater of Tarsus. 2004. On Marriage in Paul on Marriage & Celibacy, ed. Deming, W., 221–29. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Behr, Charles A., ed. 1981. P. Aelius Aristides: The Complete Works Volume II. Orations XVII–LIII. Vol. 2. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter, ed. 1986. The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation including the Demotic Spells. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Canivet, Pierre, ed. 1958. Théodoret de Cyr: Thérapeutique des maladies helléniques. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, James H., ed. 1985. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. 2 vols. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
Chilton, C. W. 1971. Diogenes of Oenoanda: The Fragments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dindorf, W., ed. 1829. Aristides. Vols. 1–2. Leipzig: Reimer (repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1964).Google Scholar
Edwards, Richard A., and Wild, Robert A., eds. 1981. The Sentences of Sextus. Ann Arbor: Scholars.Google Scholar
Felten, J., ed. 1913. Nicolai progymnasmata. Rhetores Graeci. Vol. 11. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Foerster, R. 1915. Libanii Opera. Vol. 8. Leipzig: Teubner (repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1997).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, William W., ed. 1992. Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought, and Influence; Part Two. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. 1993. Sayings by Diogenes Perserved in Arabic. In Le cynisme ancien et ses prolongements, eds. Goulet-Cazé, M. O. and Goulet, R., 475–518. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Haase, Fr., ed. 1902. L. Annaei Senecae: Opera qvae svpersvnt svpplementvm. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Hense, O., and Wachsmuth, C., eds. 1884–1912. Ioannis Stobaei anthologium. 5 vols. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Jäkel, Siegfried, ed. 1964. Menandri Sententiae: Comparatio Menandri et Philistionis. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A., ed. 2003. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kovacs, Judith. 2005. 1 Corinthians: Interpreted by Early Christian Commentators. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Kühn, Karl Gottlob, ed. 1965. Claudii Galeni Opera omnia. Vol. 8. Hildesheim: G. Olms.Google Scholar
Lutz, Cora, ed. 1947. Musonius Rufus ‘The Roman Socrates’. Yale Classical Studies. Vol. 10. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J., ed. 1977. The Cynic Epistles: A Study Edition. Missoula: Scholars.Google Scholar
Marcovich, Miroslav, ed. 1999. Diogenis Laertii: Vitae Philosophorum. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Ocellus Lucanus, . 2004. On the Nature of the Universe [Spurious] in Paul on Marriage & Celibacy, ed. and trans. Deming, W., 231–37. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Oribasius, . 1851. Oeuvres d’Oribase. Trans. Ulco Cats Bussemaker and Charles Daremberg. Vol. 1. Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar
Pendrick, Gerard J., ed. 2002. Antiphon the Sophist: The Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pertusi, Augustinus, ed. 1955. Scholia vetera in Hesiodi Opera et dies. Milano: Società Editrice ‘Vita e Pensiero’.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Joyce. 1982. Aphrodisias and Rome. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Smith, Martin Ferguson, ed. 1993. The Epicurean Inscription: Diogenes of Oenoanda Napoli: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Smith, Martin Ferguson, ed. 2003. Supplement to Diogenes of Oinoanda The Epicurean Inscription Napoli: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Soranus, . 1956. Gynecology. Translated by O. Temkin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1999. The Atomists Leucippus and Democritus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Trapp, Michael, ed. 1997. The Philosophical Orations / Maximus of Tyre. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouna, Voula. 2007. The Ethics of Philodemus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrli, Fritz, ed. 1967. Dikaiarchos. Die Schule des Aristoteles: Texte und Kommentar. Vol. 1. Basel; Stuttgart: Schwabe.Google Scholar
White, Robert J. 1975. The Interpretation of Dreams: Oneirocritica by Artemidorus. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Achelis, Hans. 1902. Virgines subintroductae: ein Beitrag zum VII. Kapitel des I. Korintherbriefs. Leipzig: Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Acsádi, G., and Nemeskéri, J.. 1970. History of Human Life Span and Mortality. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Adams, Edward. 2000. Constructing the World: A Study in Paul’s Cosmological Language. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Agnihotri, Satish Balran. 2000. Sex Ratio Patterns in the Indian Population: A Fresh Exploration. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Alexander, L. 1998. Better to Marry Than to Burn: St. Paul and the Greek Novel. In Ancient Fiction and Early Christian Narrative, eds. Hock, R. F., Chance, J. B., and Perkins, J., 235–56. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David, ed. 2004. Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Arzt-Grabner, Peter, Kritzer, Ruth Elisabeth, et al. 2006. 1. Korinther. Papyrologische Kommentare zum Neuen Testament. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth. 1990a. Free Action and the Swerve. In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Vol. 8, 275–91. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth. 2004. Epicurean Economics. In Philodemus and the New Testament World, eds. Fitzgerald, J. T., Obbink, D., and Holland, G. S., 133–76. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Austin, Norman. 1994. Helen of Troy and Her Shameless Phantom. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Baasland, Ernst. 1996. ἀνάγκη bei Paulus im Lichte eines stoischen Paradoxes. In Geschichte – Tradition – Reflexion: Festschrift für Martin Hengel zum 70. Geburtstag, eds. Cancik, Hubert, Lichtenberger, Hermann, and Schäfer, P., vol. III, 357–85. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Bagnall, Roger S. 1997. The Census List. In The Census Register P.Oxy. 984: The Reverse of Pindar’s Paeans, eds. Bagnall, R. S., Frier, B. W., and Rutherford, I. C., 19–26. Brussels: Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Bagnall, Roger S. 2007. Family and Society in Roman Oxyrhynchus. In Oxyrhynchus: A City and its Texts, ed. Bowman, A. K., 182–93. London: Egypt Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Bagnall, Roger S., and Frier, Bruce W.. 1994. The Demography of Roman Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, Roger S., and Frier, Bruce W.. 2006. The Demography of Roman Egypt. Reprint with Catalogue of Census Declarations Supplement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bagnall, Roger S., Frier, Bruce W., et al. 1997. The Census Register P.Oxy. 984: The Reverse of Pindar’s Paeans. Brussels: Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Bailey, Cyril, ed. 1947. Titi Lucreti Cari de rerum natura: libri sex. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. E. 2011. Paul through Mediterranean Eyes: Cultural Studies in 1 Corinthians. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Balch, David L. 1971–72. Backgrounds of I Cor. VII: Sayings of the Lord in Q; Moses as an Ascetic ΘΕΙΟΣ ΑΝΗΡ in II Cor. III. NTS 18: 351–64.Google Scholar
Balch, David L. 1981. Let Wives Be Submissive: The Domestic Code in 1 Peter. Chico: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Balch, David L. 1983. 1 Corinthians 7:32–35 and Stoic Debates about Marriage, Anxiety and Distraction. JBL 102: 429–39.Google Scholar
Balch, David L. 2004. Philodemus, ‘On Wealth’ and ‘On Household Management’: Naturally Wealthy Epicureans against Poor Cynics. In Philodemus and the New Testament World, eds. Fitzgerald, J. T., Obbink, D., and Holland, G. S., 177–96. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. 1992. Thessalonica and Corinth: Social Contrasts in Pauline Christianity. JSNT 47: 49–74.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. 2016. Apocalyptic Allegiance and Disinvestment in the World: A Reading of 1 Corinthians 7:25–35. In Paul and the Apocalyptic Imagination, eds. Ben, J. K. G., Blackwell, C., and Maston, Jason, 257–74. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, P. 2011. The Corinthian Question: Why Did the Church Oppose Paul? Nottingham: Apollos (IVP).Google Scholar
Barré, Michael L. 1974. To Marry or to Burn: Pyrousthai in I Cor 7:9. CBQ 36: 193–202.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. K. 1971. A Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians. 2nd ed. London: A & C Black.Google Scholar
Bartchy, S. Scott. 1973. First-Century Slavery and 1 Corinthians 7:21. Missoula: University of Montana.Google Scholar
Barton, Stephen. 1995. Historical Criticism and Social-Scientific Perspectives in New Testament Study. In Hearing the New Testament, ed. Green, J. B., 61–89. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Barton, Stephen. 2017. Sanctification and Oneness in 1 Corinthians with Implications for the Case of ‘Mixed Marriages’ (1 Corinthians 7.12–16). NTS 63: 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumert, Norbert. 1996. Woman and Man in Paul. Translated by P. Madigan and L. M. Maloney. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Baur, F. C. 1851. Die Einleitung in das Neue Testament als theologische Wissenschaft. Theologische Jahrbücher (Tübingen) 10: 294–97.Google Scholar
Baur, F. C. 1852. Beiträge zur Erklärung der Korinthierbriefe. Theologische Jahrbücher (Tübingen) 11: 1–40.Google Scholar
Bengel, John Albert. 1877. Gnomon of The New Testament. Translated by A. D. Fausset. Vol. 3. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Berger, Klaus. 1984. Gnosis/Gnostizismus I. In Theologische Realenzyklopädie, ed. Horst, R. B., vol. XIII, 519–35. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bickel, Ernst. 1915. Diatribe in Senecae philosophi fragmenta. Vol. 1: Fragmenta de matrimonio. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Bieżuńska-Małowist, Iza. 1977. L’esclavage dans l’Égypte gréco-romaine. Vol. 2. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
Bintliff, J. 1977. Natural Environment and Human Settlement in Prehistoric Greece: Based on Original Fieldwork. Vol. 1. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blue, Bradley B. 1991. The House Church at Corinth and the Lord’s Supper: Famine, Food Supply and the Present Distress. Criswell Theological Review 5: 221–39.Google Scholar
Boer, W. den 1973. Demography in Roman History: Facts and Impressions. Mnemosyne 26: 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollack, Jean. 1975. La pensée du plaisir: Épicure: textes moraux, commentaires. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Bookidis, Nancy. 2005. Religion in Corinth: 146 B.C.E. to 100 C.E. In Urban Religion in Roman Corinth, eds. Schowalter, D. N. and Friesen, S. J., 141–64. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boozer, Anna Lucille. 2019. Looking for Singles in the Archaeological Record of Roman Egypt. In The Single Life in the Roman and Later Roman World, eds. Laes, C. and Huebner, S. R., 57–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, Alan K. 1995. Review of Roger S. Bagnall and Bruce W. Frier, The Demography of Roman Egypt. JRS 85: 310–11.Google Scholar
Boyancé, Pierre. 1960. L’épicurisme dans la société et la littérature romaines. Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 4: 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakke, David. 2020. Holy Men and Women of the Desert. In The Oxford Handbook of Christian Monasticism, ed. Kaczynski, Bernice M., 36–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Branham, R. Bracht, and Goulet-Cazé, M. O., eds. 1996. The Cynics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, David. 2000. Learning, Luxury and Empire: Athenaeus’ Roman Patron. In Athenaeus and his World, eds. Braund, D. and Wilkins, J., 3–22. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Braund, Susanna Morton, ed. 2004. Juvenal and Persius. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Tad. 1996. Epicurus on Sex, Marriage and Children. Classical Philology 91.4: 346–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, Brian, and Wannenwetsch, Bernd. 2016. The Malady of the Christian Body: A Theological Exposition of Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians. Eugene, OR: Cascade.Google Scholar
Broek, Roelof van den. 1983. The Present State of Gnostic Studies. Vigiliae Christianae 37: 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookins, Timothy. 2014. Corinthian Wisdom, Stoic Philosophy, and the Ancient Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookins, Timothy A., and Longenecker, Bruce W.. 2016. 1 Corinthians 1–9: A Handbook on the Greek Text. Waco: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Eric. 2009. Politics and Society. In The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J., 179–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Paul J. 2014. Bodily Resurrection and Ethics in 1 Cor 15: Connecting Faith and Morality in the Context of Greco-Roman Mythology. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Bruning, James L., and Kintz, B. L.. 1997. Computational Handbook of Statistics. 4th ed. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1971. Italian Manpower, 225 B.C.–A.D. 14. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, Joseph M. 1996. Moral Codes and Social Structure in Ancient Greece. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Büchler, Adolph. 1968. Types of Jewish-Palestinian Piety from 70 B.C.E. to 70 C.E: The Ancient Pious Men. New York: KTAV.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. 1956. Primitive Christianity in Its Contemporary Setting. Translated by R. H. Fuller. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Burk, D. 2008. Discerning Corinthian Slogans through Paul’s Use of the Diatribe in 1 Corinthians 6:12–20. Bulletin for Biblical Research 18: 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvin, John. 1993. Commentary on the Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians. Translated by J. Pringle. Grand Rapids: Baker.Google Scholar
Caragounis, Chrys C. 1996. ‘Fornication’ and ‘Concession’ Interpreting 1 Cor 7,1–7. In Corinthian Correspondence, ed. Bieringer, R., 543–59. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Caragounis, Chrys C. 2006. What Did Paul Mean? The Debate on 1 Cor 7,1–7. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 82.1: 189–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartlidge, David R. 1975. 1 Corinthians 7 as a Foundation for a Christian Sex Ethic. JR 55: 220–34.Google Scholar
Casaubon, Isaac, ed. 1593. Diogenis Laertii: De vitis, dogmatis et apophthegmatis clarorum philosophorum, libri X. 2nd ed. Geneva: H. Stephanus.Google Scholar
Castner, C. J. 1988. Prosopography of Roman Epicureans: From the Second Century B.C. to the Second Century A.D. Frankfort: Lang.Google Scholar
Chilton, C. W. 1960. Did Epicurus Approve of Marriage? A Study of Diogenes Laertius X, 119. Phronesis: 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciampa, Roy E. 2009. Revisiting the Euphemism in 1 Corinthians 7.1. JSNT 31.3: 325–38.Google Scholar
Ciampa, Roy E. 2011. ‘Flee Sexual Immorality’: Sex and the City of Corinth. In The Wisdom of the Cross: Exploring 1 Corinthians, ed. Rosner, B. S., 100–33. Nottingham: Apollos.Google Scholar
Ciampa, Roy E., and Rosner, Brian S.. 2010. The First Letter to the Corinthians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. 1999. Reading Renunciation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. 2005. Dissuading from Marriage: Jerome and the Asceticization of Satire. In Satiric Advice on Woman and Marriage, ed. Smith, W. S., 154–81. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. 1979. Pre-Roman and Roman Winchester Part II: The Roman Cemetary at Lankhills. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Clarysse, Willy, and Thompson, Dorothy. 2006. Counting the People in Hellenistic Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Claytor, W. Graham, and Bagnall, R. S.. 2015. The Beginnings of the Roman Provincial Census: A New Declaration from 3 BCE. Greek 55.3: 637–53.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J. 1971. Age Patterns of Marriage. Population Studies 25: 193–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, Adela Yarbro. 2019. Ancient Christians on Marriage and Celibacy: Readings of 1 Corinthians 7 in the Early Church. Biblical Research 64: 6–24.Google Scholar
Collins, John. 1961. Chiasmus, the ‘ABA’ Pattern and the Text of Paul. In Studiorum Paulinorum Congressus Internationalis Catholicus, vol. 2, 575–83. Rome: E Pontificio Instituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Collins, Raymond F. 1992. A Problem at Corinth. In Divorce in the New Testament, 9–39. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Raymond F. 1999. First Corinthians. Sacra Pagina Series. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Colonna, Aristides, ed. 1959. Hesiod: Opera et dies. Milan: Istituto Editoriale Cisalpino.Google Scholar
Concannon, Cavan W. 2014. ‘When You Were Gentiles’: Specters of Ethnicity in Roman Corinth and Paul’s Corinthian Correspondence. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conzelmann, Hans. 1975. 1 Corinthians: A Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians. Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Cross, F. L., ed. 2005. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. 3rd rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, George. 1909. Celibacy (Christian). In Encyclopedia of Religions and Ethics, ed. Hastings, J., 271–75. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Danylak, Barry. 2008. Tiberius Claudius Dinippus and the Food Shortages in Corinth. TB 59.2: 231–70.Google Scholar
Danylak, Barry. 2010. Redeeming Singleness: How the Storyline of Scripture Affirms the Single Life. Wheaton: Crossway.Google Scholar
Daube, David. 1959. Concessions to Sinfulness in Jewish Law. The Journal of Jewish Studies 10: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kingsley. 1951. The Population of India and Pakistan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dawes, Gregory W. 1990. ‘But If You Can Gain Your Freedom’ (1 Corinthians 7:17–24). CBQ 52: 681–97.Google Scholar
De Witt, Norman Wentworth. 1936. Epicurean Contubernium. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 67: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Witt, Norman Wentworth. 1945. Roman Epicureanism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Canada 59: 31–44.Google Scholar
De Witt, Norman Wentworth. 1954. St. Paul and Epicurus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deasley, Alex R. G. 2021. 1 Corinthians: A Commentary in the Wesleyan Tradition. Kansas City: Beacon Hill.Google Scholar
Deissmann, Adolf. 1926. Paul: A Study in Social and Religious History. Translated by W. E. Wilson. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Deissmann, Adolf. 1927. Light from the Ancient East. Translated by L. R. M. Strachan. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
DeMaris, Richard E. 2002. Cults and the Imperial Cult in Early Roman Corinth: Literary Versus Material Record. In Zwishen den Reichen: Neues Testament und Römische Herrschaft, eds. Labahn, M. and Zangenberg, J., 73–91. Tübingen: Franke Verlag.Google Scholar
Deming, Will. 2004. Paul on Marriage & Celibacy: The Hellenistic Background of 1 Corinthians 7. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Dixon, Ruth B. 1971. Explaining Cross-Cultural Variations in Age at Marriage and Proportions Never Marrying. Population Studies 25: 215–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, Ruth B. 1978. Late Marriage and Non-Marriage as Demographic Responses: Are They Similar? Population Studies 32: 449–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, John A. 1984. The Ethics of Democritus and Aristotle. In Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Democritus, ed. Benakis, L. G., 371–85. Xanthi: E. Bouloukos.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Richard. 1982. The Economy of the Roman Empire. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dupont, Florence. 1989. Daily Life in Ancient Rome. Translated by C. Woodall. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dupont, Jacques. 1949. Gnosis: La connaissance religieuse dans les épitres de Saint Paul. Louvain: E. Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Edwards, Katherine M. 1933. Corinth, Vol. 6: Coins 1896–1929. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Thomas Charles. 1903. A Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. 1997. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Einarson, Benedict, and De Lacy, Phillip H., eds. 1967. Plutarch: Moralia Volume XIV. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellicott, Charles, , J. 1887. St Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. K. 1972–73. Paul’s Teaching on Marriage in 1 Corintians: Some Problems Considered. NTS 19: 219–25.Google Scholar
Elliott, John. 1995. Social-Scientific Criticism of the New Testament: An Introduction. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. Earle. 1974. ‘Christ Crucified’. In Reconciliation and Hope. New Testament Essays in Atonement and Eschatology Presented to L. L. Morris, ed. Banks, R., 70–75. Exeter: Paternoster.Google Scholar
Emeljanow, V. 1965. A Note on the Cynic Short Cut to Happiness. Mnemosyne 18.2: 182–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, Donald W. 1990. Roman Corinth: An Alternative Model for the Classical City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Erdkamp, Paul. 2005. The Grain Market in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, Anders. 1998. ‘Women Tongue Speakers, Be Silent’: A Reconstruction through Paul’s Rhetoric. Biblical Interpretation 6.1: 80–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erler, Michael. 2009. Epicureanism in the Roman Empire. In The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J., 46–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erler, Michael. 2020. Epicurus: An Introduction to His Practical Ethics and Politics. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar
Erler, Michael, Flashar, Hellmut, et al. 1994. Die Philosophie der Antike / Band 4,1, Die hellenistische Philosophie. 2 vols. Basel: Schwabe/Verlag.Google Scholar
Erler, Michael, and Schofield, Malcolm. 1999. Epicurean Ethics. In The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, eds. Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M., 642–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Esler, Philip. 1998. The Social Ethos of the Corinthian Correspondence. Interests and Ideology from 1 Corinthians to 1 Clement. JTS 49: 253–60.Google Scholar
Evans Grubbs, Judith. 2019. Singles, Sex and Status in the Augustan Marriage Legislation. In The Single Life in the Roman and Later Roman World, eds. Laes, C. and Huebner, S. R., 105–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. 1980. 1 Cor. 7:1 in the NIV. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 23: 307–14.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. 2003. 1 Corinthians 7:1–7 Revisited. In Paul and the Corinthians: Studies on a Community in Conflict, eds. Burke, T. J. and Elliott, J. K., 197–213. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. 2014. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Ferguson, John. 1990. Epicureanism under the Roman Empire. In ANRW. Vol. 2.36.4, 2257–327.Google Scholar
Findlay, G. G. 1891. St. Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians. In The Expositor’s Greek Testament, ed. Nicoll, W. R., vol. 2, 727–953. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Finn, Richard. 2009. Asceticism in the Graeco-Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, Mark T. 2012. Honour and Conflict in the Ancient World: 1 Corinthians in Its Greco-Roman Social Setting. New York: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Fiore, Benjamin. 1990. Passion in Paul and Plutarch: 1 Corinthians 5–6 and the Polemic against Epicurus. In Greeks, Romans, and Christians, eds. Balch, D. L., Ferguson, E., and Meeks, W. A., 135–43. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Fiorenza, Elizabeth S. 1983. In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Fish, Jeffrey. 2011. Not All Politicians Are Sisyphus: What Roman Epicureans Were Taught about Politics. In Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, eds. Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R., 72–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. 2008. First Corinthians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. The Anchor Yale Bible. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Rebecca. 1999. Quae Corpore Quaestum Facit: The Sexual Economy of Female Prostitution in the Roman Empire. JRS 89: 38–61.Google Scholar
Flexsenhar, Michael III. 2015. Recovering Paul’s Hypothetical Slaves: Rhetoric and Reality in 1 Corinthians 7:21. Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters 5.1: 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. Massyngberde. 1964. Levirate Marriage in St Paul (1 Cor 7). NTS 10: 361–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. Massyngberde. 1964–65. St. Paul the Philogamist (1 Cor vii in Early Patristic Exegesis). NTS 11: 326–48.Google Scholar
Ford, J. Massyngberde. 1966. The Rabbinic Background of St. Paul’s Use of Hyperakmos. JJS 18: 89–91.Google Scholar
Fox, Arminta M. 2020. Paul Decentered: Reading 2 Corinthians with the Corinthian Women. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Fox, Arminta M. 2021. The Writing Continues: The Women Are Still There in 2 Corinthians. In After the Corinthian Women Prophets, ed. Marchal, Joseph. A., 145–64. Atlanta: SBL.Google Scholar
Fraade, Steven D. 1986. Ascetical Aspects of Ancient Judaism. In Jewish Spirituality, ed. Green, A., 253–88. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedländer, Ludwig. 1919. Darstellungen aus der Sittengeschichte Roms: in der Zeit von August bis zum Ausgang der Antonine. 9th ed. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Frier, Bruce W. 1997. Demographic Analysis. In The Census Register P.Oxy. 984: The Reverse of Pindar’s Paeans, eds. Bagnall, R. S., Frier, B. W., and Rutherford, I. C., 89–113. Brussels: Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Friesen, Steven J. 2004. Poverty in Pauline Studies: Beyond the So-called New Consensus. JSNT 26: 323–61.Google Scholar
Garcilazo, Albert V. 2007. The Corinthian Dissenters and the Stoics. New York: Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. E. 1983. The Christian’s Posture toward Marriage and Celibacy: 1 Corinthians 7. Review & Expositor 80: 351–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. E. 2003. 1 Corinthians. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker.Google Scholar
Garnsey, Peter. 1988. Famine and Food Supply in the Graeco-Roman World: Responses to Risk and Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnsey, Peter, and Morris, Ian. 1989. Risk and the Polis: The Evolution of Institutionalised Reponses to Food Supply Problems in the Ancient Greek State. In Bad Year Economics, eds. Halstead, P. and O’Shea, J., 98–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre. 1675. Animadversiones in librum X Diogenis Laertii qui est De Vita, Moribus, Placitisque Epicuri. 3rd ed. Leyden: Francisci Barbier.Google Scholar
Georgi, Dieter. 1986. The Opponents of Paul in Second Corinthians. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Gustav A. 1912. Zur Legende vom Kyniker Diogenes. Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 15: 388–408.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. 1996. Sigfridus Sudhaus Philodemeorum studiosus. Cronache Ercolanesi 26: 15–26.Google Scholar
Gill, David W. J., and Hubbard, Moyer V.. 2007. 1 & 2 Corinthians. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Gillihan, Yonder Moynihan. 2002. Jewish Laws on Illicit Marriage, the Defilement of Offspring, and the Holiness of the Temple: A New Halakic Interpretation of 1 Corinthians 7:14. JBL 121.4: 711–44.Google Scholar
Goar, R. J. 1971. On the End of Lucretius’ Fourth Book. The Classical Bulletin 47: 75–77.Google Scholar
Golden, Mark. 2000. A Decade of Demography: Recent Trends in the Study of Greek and Roman Populations. In Polis & Politics, eds. Flensted-Jensen, P., Nielson, T. H., and Rubenstein, L., 23–40. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. Dorcas. 1997. Sister or Wife?: 1 Corinthians 7 and Cultural Anthropology. Sheffield: JSNT.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.O. 1990. Le cynisme à l’époque impériale. In ANRW. Vol. 2.36.4, 2720–833. Berlin.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.O. 1996. Appendix A: A Comprehensive Catalogue of Known Cynic Philosophers. In The Cynics, eds. Bracht Branham, R. and Goulet-Cazé, M. O., 389–413. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gove, Philip Babcock, ed. 1986. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged. Springfield: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Grilli, Alberto. 1971. Epicuro e il Matrimonio. Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia 26: 51–56.Google Scholar
Grosheide, F. W. 1953. Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Gummere, Richard M. 1925. Introduction. In Seneca: Ad Lucilium Epistulae Moralia, vii–xii. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gundry, Judith M. 2014. Anxiety or Care for People? The Theme of 1 Corinthians 7:32–34 and the Relation between Exegesis and Theology. In Reconsidering the Relationship between Biblical and Systematic Theology in the New Testament: Essays by Theologians and New Testament Scholars, eds. Reynolds, Benjamin E., Lugioyo, Brian, and Vanhoozer, Kevin J., 109–30. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Gundry, Judith M. 2016. Affliction for Procreators in the Eschatological Crisis: Paul’s Marital Counsel in 1 Corinthians 7.28 and Contraception in Greco-Roman Antiquity. JSNT 39.2: 141–68.Google Scholar
Gundry-Volf, Judith M. 1994a. Celibate Pneumatics and Social Power: On the Motivations for Sexual Asceticism in Corinth. Union Seminary Quarterly Review 48: 105–26.Google Scholar
Gundry-Volf, Judith M. 1994b. Male and Female in Creation and New Creation: Interpretations of Galatians 3:28c in 1 Corinthians 7. In To Tell the Mystery, 95–121. Sheffield: JSOT.Google Scholar
Gundry-Volf, Judith M. 1996. Controlling the Bodies: The Corinthian Sexual Ascetics (1 Cor 7). In Corinthian Correspondence, ed. Bieringer, R., 519–41. Louvain: Louvain University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1962. A History of Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, Harald. 1958. Latin Fathers and the Classics: A Study on the Apologists, Jerome and Other Christian Writers. Stockholm: Göteborg.Google Scholar
Hanks, Patrick, ed. 1986. Collins Dictionary of the English Language. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph, and Lawler, Traugott, eds. 1997. Jankyn’s Book of Wikked Wyves. Athens: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Harmon, A. M., ed. 1961. Lucian. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, Kyle. 2012. Porneia: The Making of a Christian Sexual Norm. JBL 131.2: 363–83.Google Scholar
Harper, Kyle. 2016. People, Plagues, and Prices in the Roman World: The Evidence from Egypt. The Journal of Economic History 76.3: 803–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartenstein, Judith. 2015. Encratism, Asceticism, and the Construction of Gender and Sexual Identity in Apocryphal Gospels. In Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Apocrypha, eds. Andrew Gregory, T. N., Tuckett, Christopher M., and Verheyden, Joseph, 389–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hastings, Adrian, ed. 2000. The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hausrath, Adolf. 1895. A History of the New Testament Times. Translated by L. Huxley. Vol. 4. Oxford: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Havelock, Eric A. 1957. The Liberal Temper in Greek Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, Richard. 2005. ‘In a Different Guise’: Roman Education and Greek Rhetorical Thought on Marriage. In Satiric Advice on Woman and Marriage: From Plautus to Chaucer, ed. Smith, W. S., 26–38. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine. 1999. Intermarriage and Impurity in Ancient Jewish Sources. HTR 92: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Christine. 2002. Gentile Impurities and Jewish Identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrici, Georg. 1881. Handbuch über den ersten Brief an die Korinther von Dr. H.A.W. Meyer. 6th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar
Heinrici, Georg. 1888. Handbuch über den ersten Brief an die Korinther von Dr. H.A.W. Meyer. 7th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar
Héring, Jean. 1962. The First Epistle of Saint Paul to the Corinthians. London: Epworth.Google Scholar
Hicks, R. D., ed. 1925. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Loeb Classical Library. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, A. 1950. Hésiode, Les travaux et les jours, 405–407, 317–319, 21–24. L'élément proverbial et son adaptation. Mnemosyne 3: 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Bengt. 1978. Paul and Power: The Structure of Authority in the Primitive Church as Reflected in the Pauline Epistles. Coniectanea Biblica. Vol. 11; New Testament Series. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Hombert, Marcel, and Préaux, Claire. 1952. Recherches sur le recensement dans l’Égypte romaine: (P. Bruxelles inv. E. 7616) Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Keith. 1965. Contraception in the Roman Empire. Comparative Studies in Society and History 8: 124–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Keith. 1966. On the Probable Age Structure of the Roman Population. Population Studies 20.2: 245–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, Keith. 1980. Brother-Sister Marriage in Roman Egypt. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22: 303–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Keith. 1987. Graveyards for Historians. In La mort les morts et l’au-delà dans le monde romain, ed. Hinard, F., 113–26. Caen: Université de Caen.Google Scholar
Horrell, David G. 1996. The Social Ethos of the Corinthian Correspondence. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Horrell, David G. 1999. Introduction: Social-Scientific Interpretation of the New Testament: Retrospect and Prospect. In Social-Scientific Approaches to New Testament Interpretation, ed. Horrell, D. G., 3–27. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Horrell, David G. 2020. Ethnicity and Inclusion: Religion, Race, and Whiteness in Constructions of Jewish and Christian Identities. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Horrell, David G., and Adams, Edward. 2004. The Scholarly Quest for Paul’s Church at Corinth: A Critical Survey. In Christianity at Corinth: The Quest for the Pauline Church, eds. Adams, Edward and Horrell, D. G., 1–43. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Horsley, Richard A. 1979. Spirtual Marriage with Sophia. Vigiliae Christianae 33: 30–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, H. M. 1948. Three Groups of Roman Epicureans. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 79: 341–42.Google Scholar
Hübner, Heinrich Gustav, ed. 1828. Diogenes Laertius: De vitis, dogmatis et apophthegmatis clarorum philosophorum, libri decem. Leipzig: Koehlerus.Google Scholar
Huebner, Sabine R. 2013. The Family in Roman Egypt: A Comparative Approach to Intergenerational Solidarity and Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huebner, Sabine R. 2019. Single Men and Women in Pagan Society: The Case of Roman Egypt. In The Single Life in the Roman and Later Roman World, eds. Laes, Christian and Huebner, Sabine R., 37–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, James Bassett. 1973. Man and Woman in 1 Corinthians: Some Exegetical Studies in Pauline Theology and Ethics. PhD diss., Faculty of Divinity, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad, and Gerson, L. P.. 1994. The Epicurus Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Jeremias, Joachim. 1966. Zur Gedankenführung in den paulinishcen Breifen. In Abba: Studien zur neutestamentlichen Theologie und Zeitgeschichte, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Johnson, Sherman E. 1982. Paul in the Wicked City of Corinth. Lexington Theological Quarterly 17: 59–67.Google Scholar
Judge, Edwin A. 1960. Social Pattern of the Christian Groups in the 1st Century: Some Prolegomena to the Study of New Testament Idea of Social Obligation. London: Tyndale.Google Scholar
Judge, Edwin A. 2008. Rank and Status in the World of the Ceasars and St Paul. In Social Distinctives of the Christians in the First Century: Pivotal Essays by E. A. Judge, ed. Scholer, D. M., 137–56. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Kaelber, Walter O. 1987. Asceticism. In The Encyclopedia of Religion, ed. Eliade, M., vol. 1, 441–45. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. 1964. An Apologia for Primitive Christian Eschatology. In Essays on New Testament Themes, trans. W. J. Montague, 169–95. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. 1969. Hellenistic Enthusiasm and Paul. In New Testament Questions of Today, 124–37. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Kee, H. C. 1980. Christian Origins in Sociological Perspective. Philadelphia: Westminster.Google Scholar
Keener, Craig S. 2005. 1–2 Corinthians. New Cambridge Bible commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, John Harvey. 1966. Corinth: Volume VIII, Part III: The Inscriptions 1926–1950. Princeton: ASCSA.Google Scholar
Kertzer, David I. 1991. Household History and Sociological Theory. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 155–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittredge, C. B. 1998. Community and Authority: The Rhetoric of Obedience in the Pauline Tradition. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
Kittredge, C. B. 2000. Corinthian Women Prophets and Paul’s Argumentation in 1 Corinthians. In Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation, ed. Horsley, R. A., 103–9. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
Kittredge, C. B. 1998. Community and Authority: The Rhetoric of Obedience in the Pauline Tradition. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
Kittredge, C. B. 2000. Corinthian Women Prophets and Paul’s Argumentation in 1 Corinthians. In Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation, ed. Horsley, Richard A., 103–9. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
Klein, William W., Blomberg, Craig L., et al. 1993. Introduction to Biblical Interpretation. Dallas: Word.Google Scholar
Kleve, M. Knut. 1969. Lucrèce, l’épicurisme et l’amour. In Actes du VIIIe Congrès, Association Guillaume Budé, 376–83. Paris: Société d’édition ‘Les Belles Lettres’.Google Scholar
Kleve, M. Knut. 1997. Lucretius and Philodemus. In Lucretius and His Intellectual Background, eds. Algra, K. A., Koenen, M. H., and Schrijvers, P. H., 49–66. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.Google Scholar
Kling, Christian Friedrich. 1869. The First Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut. 1982. Introduction to the New Testament 1: History, Culture, and Religion of the Hellenistic Age. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
König, Jason. 2001. Favorinus’ Corinthian Oration in its Corinthian Context. PCPhS 47: 141–71.Google Scholar
Kraemer, Ross S. 2019. Thecla. In The Oxford Handbook of New Testament, Gender, and Sexuality, ed. Dunning, Benjamin H., 485–503. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Jens-Uwe. 1995. Rechtliche und soziale Stellung von Waisen. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Kuck, D. W. 1992. Judgment and Community Conflict: Paul’s Use of Apocalyptic Judgment Language in 1 Corinthians 3:5–4:5. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kümmel, W. G. 1954. Verlobung und Heirat bei Paulus (I. Cor 7.36–38). In Neutestamentliche Studien für Rudolf Bultmann, ed. Eltester, W., 275–95. Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann.Google Scholar
Laes, Christian. 2019. What’s in a Single? Roman Antiquity and a Comparative World Approach. In The Single Life in the Roman and Later Roman World, eds. Laes, C. and Huebner, S. R., 3–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Jan. 2001. Three Brief Notes on 1 Cor 15. In Collected Studies on Pauline Literature and on the Book of Revelation. Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Jan. 2012. What Kind of Logic Is There in 1 Corinthians 7,14cd? Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 88.1: 173–78.Google Scholar
Lang, T. J. 2018. Trouble with Insiders: The Social Profile of the ἄπιστοι in Paul’s Corinthian Correspondence. JBL 137.4: 981–1001.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. 1972. Introduction: The History of the Family. In Household and Family in Past Times, eds., Laslett, P. and Wall, R., 1–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, P. 1983. Family and Household as Work Group and Kin Group: Areas of Traditional Europe Compared. In Family Forms in Historic Europe, ed. Wall, R., 513–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Last, R. 2016. The Pauline Church and the Corinthian Ekklēsia: Greco-Roman Associations in Comparative Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laughery, G. J. 1997. Paul: Anti-marriage? Anti-sex? Ascetic? A Dialogue with 1 Corinthians 7:1–40. Evangelical Quarterly 69: 109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ronald. 1981. Short-term Variation: Vital Rates, Prices, and Weather. In The Population History of England 1541–1871, eds. Wrigley, E. A. and Schofield, R. S., 356–401. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Leipoldt, Johannes. 1961. Griechische Philosophie und frühchristliche Askese. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Leonard, WIlliam Ellery, and Smith, Stanley Barney, eds. 1968. T. Lvcreti Cari: De Rerum Natura. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Leshem, Dotan. 2016. Retrospectives: What Did the Ancient Greeks Mean by ‘Oikonomia’? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 30.1: 225–38.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. B. 1895. Notes on Epistles of St Paul from Unpublished Commentaries. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Litfin, A. Duane. 1994. St. Paul’s Theology of Proclamation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A. 1996a. The Socratic Tradition: Diogenes, Crates, and Hellenistic Ethics. In The Cynics, eds. Bracht Branham, R. and Goulet-Cazé, M. O., 28–46. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Anthony A. 1996b. Stoic Eudaimonism. In Stoic Studies, ed. Long, A. A., 179–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A. 1999. The Socratic Legacy. In The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, eds. Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M., 617–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A., and Sedley, D. N.. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lund, Nils. 1942. Chiasmus in the New Testament. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lütgert, W. 1908. Freiheitspredigt und Schwarmgeister in Korith: Ein Beitrag zur Charakteristik der Christuspartei. Gütersloh: C. Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. 1973. Select Pauline Epistles, 1 Corinthians 7, 1 Corinthians 15, Lectures on 1 Timothy. Luther’s Works. Vol. 28. St. Louis: Concordia.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Dennis Ronald. 1983. The Legend and the Apostle. Philadelphia: Westminster.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Margaret Y. 1988. The Pauline Churches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Margaret Y. 1990. Women Holy in Body and Spirit: The Social Setting of 1 Corinthians 7. New Testament Studies 36: 161–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Margaret Y. 1996. Early Christian Women and Pagan Opinion: The Power of the Hysterical Woman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Margaret Y. 2012. Reading 1 Corinthians 7 through the Eyes of Families. In Text, Image, and Christians in the Graeco-Roman World: A Festschrift in Honor of David Lee Balch, eds. Niang, A. C. and Osiek, C., 38–52. Eugene, OR: Pickwick.Google Scholar
MacDonnell, W. R. 1913. On the Expectation of Life in Ancient Rome. Biometrika 9: 366–80.Google Scholar
Mackie, Scott D. 2013. The Two Tables of the Law and Paul’s Ethical Methodology in 1 Corinthians 6:12–20 and 10:23–11:1. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 75.2: 315–34.Google Scholar
MacRae, G. W. 1978. Nag Hammadi and the New Testament. In Gnosis: Festschrift für Hans Jonas, ed. Aland, B., 144–57. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Matthew R. 2018. The Church without Ascetics: The Lack of an Ascetic Group in Corinth. Journal for the Study of Paul and His Letters 8.1–2: 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J. 1970. ‘Gentle as a Nurse’: The Cynic Background to 1 Thessalonians 2. Novum Testamentum 12: 203–17.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J. 1982. Self-Definition among Epicureans and Cynics. In Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, eds. Meyer, B. F. and Sanders, E. P., 46–59. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Abraham J. 1983. Social Aspects of Early Christianity. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Malina, Bruce J. 1982. The Social Sciences and Biblical Interpretation. Interpretation 36: 229–42.Google Scholar
Malina, Bruce J. 1986a. Christian Origins and Cultural Anthropology. Atlanta: John Knox.Google Scholar
Malina, Bruce J. 1986b. The Received View and What It Cannot Do: III John and Hospitality. Semeia 35: 171–89.Google Scholar
Malina, Bruce J. 2001. The New Testament World. 3rd ed. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Marchal, Joseph A. 2011. The Corinthian Women Prophets and Trans Activism: Rethinking Canonical Gender Claims. In Bible Trouble: Queer Reading at the Boundaries of Biblical Scholarship, eds. Hornsby, Teresa J. and Stone, Ken, 223–46. Atlanta: SBL.Google Scholar
Marchal, Joseph A., ed. 2021. After the Corinthian Women Prophets Reimagining Rhetoric and Power. Atlanta: SBL.Google Scholar
Marcovich, Miroslav, ed. 1999. Diogenis Laertii: Vitae Philosophorum. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Marshall, Jill E. 2017. Women Praying and Prophesying in Corinth: Gender and Inspired Speech in First Corinthians. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Alistair Scott. 2004. ‘The Body for the Lord’: Sex and Identity in 1 Corinthians 5–7. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Mazumdar, Vina, and Krishnaji, N., eds. 2001. Enduring Conundrum: India’s Sex Ratio. Delhi: Rainbow.Google Scholar
McArthur, H. 1987. Celibacy in Judaism at the Time of Christian Beginnings. Andrews University Seminary Studies 25.2: 163–81.Google Scholar
McGinn, Thomas A. J. 2002. The Augustan Marriage Legislation and Social Practice: Elite Endogamy versus Male ‘Marrying Down’. In Specvlum ivris eds. Aubert, J.-J. and Sirks, B., 46–93. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McGinn, Thomas A. J. 2004a. The Economy of Prostitution in the Roman World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, Thomas A. J. 2004b. Missing Females? Augustus’ Encouragement of Marriage between Freeborn Males and Freedwomen. Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 53: 200–208.Google Scholar
McKirahan, Voula Tsouna. 1994. The Socratic Origins of the Cynics and Cyrenaics. In The Socratic Movement, ed. Waerdt, P. A. V., 367–91. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McWilliam, Janette. 2001. Children among the Dead: The Influence of Urban Life on the Commemoration of Children in Tombstone Inscriptions. In Childhood, Class and Kin in the Roman World, ed. Dixon, S., 74–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A. 1974. The Image of the Androgyne: Some Uses of a Symbol in Earliest Christianity. HR 13: 165–208.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A. 2003. The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Menoud, Ph.-H. 1951. Mariage et célibat selon Saint Paul. Revue de théologie et de philosophie 1: 21–34.Google Scholar
Merklein, Helmut. 1987. ‘Es ist gut für den Menschen, eine Frau nicht anzufassen’: Paulus und die Sexualität nach 1 Kor 7. In Studien zu Jesus und Paulus, 385–408. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. A. W. 1861. Handbuch über den ersten Brief an die Korinther. 4th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. A. W. 1870. Handbuch über den ersten Brief an die Korinther. 5th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. A. W. 1892. Critical and Exegetical Handbook to the Epistles to the Corinthians. 5th ed. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Milinovich, Timothy. 2013. Beyond What Is Written: The Performative Structure of 1 Corinthians. Eugene, OR: Pickwick.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. 1989. Concerning περὶ δέ in 1 Corinthians. Novum Testamentum 31: 229–56.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. 1991. Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation: An Exegetical Investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Moffatt, James. 1938. The First Epistle of Paul to Corinthians. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Moles, John L. 1995. The Cynics and Politics. In Justice and Generosity, eds. Laks, A. and Schofield, M., 129–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Clifford H., and Jackson, John, eds. 1931. Tacitus. Histories: Books 4–5. Annals: Books 1–3. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Leon. 1985. The First Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians: An Introduction and Commentary. 2nd ed. Leicester: IVP.Google Scholar
Most, Glenn W., ed. 2006. Hesiod: Theogony. Works and Days. Testimonia. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Muniruzzaman, A. N. M. 1966. Demographic Survey in East Pakistan, 1961–62, Part 2, Chapter 1: Basic Demographic Characteristics. Dacca: Statistical Survey Research Unit in collaboration with Institute of Statistical Research and Training, University of Dacca.Google Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. 1984. The Corinth That Saint Paul Saw. The Biblical Archaeologist 47: 147–59.Google Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. 2009a. The Divorced Woman in 1 Cor 7:10–11. In Keys to First Corinthians, 32–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. 2009b. Works without Faith in 1 Corinthians 7:14. In Keys to First Corinthians, 43–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanos, Mark D. 2017. Reading Corinthians and Philippians within Judaism: Collected Essays of Mark D. Nanos. Vol. 4. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.Google Scholar
Nasrallah, Laura S. 2014. ‘You Were Bought with a Price’: Freedpersons and Things in 1 Corinthians. In Corinth in Contrast, eds. Friesen, Steven J., James, Sarah A., and Schowalter, Daniel N., 54–73. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Natali, Carlo. 1995. Oikonomia in Hellenistic Political Thought. In Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy – Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Hellenisticum, eds. Laks, Andre and Schofield, Malcolm, 95–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Derek. 1998. Deity and Diet: The Dilemma of Sacrificial Food at Corinth. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Neyrey, Jerome H. 1986. Body Language in 1 Corinthians: The Use of Anthropological Models for Understanding Paul and His Opponents. Semeia 35: 129–70.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Hanne Sigismund. 1991. Ditus Examen Domus? On the Use of the Term Verna in the Roman Epigraphical and Literary Sources. Classica et Mediaevalia 42: 221–40.Google Scholar
Noy, David. 2000. Foreigners at Rome: Citizens and Strangers. London: Duckworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Timothy. 2005. Epicurus on Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Økland, Jorunn. 2004. Women in Their Place: Paul and the Corinthian Discourse of Gender and Sanctuary Space. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Økland, Jorunn. 2019. Pauline Letters. In Oxford Handbook of New Testament, Gender, and Sexuality, ed. Dunning, B. H., 315–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olshausen, Hermann. 1863. Biblical Commentary on St. Paul’s First and Second Epistles to the Corinthians. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Olson, S. Douglas. 2006. Introduction. In Athenaeus: The Learned Banqueters, ed. Olson, S. D., vii–xix. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Omanson, Roger L. 1992. Acknowledging Paul’s Quotations. The Bible Translator 43.2: 201–13.Google Scholar
Omanson, Roger L. 2013. The King James New Testament: How a Translation Determined Christian Thought on Marriage and Celibacy for Nearly Four Hundred Years. The Bible Translator 64.2: 204–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oropeza, Brisio J. 2017. 1 Corinthians: A New Covenant Commentary. Eugene, OR: Cascade.Google Scholar
Orr, William F. 1967. Paul’s Treatment of Marriage in 1 Corinthians 7. Pittsburgh Perspective 8.3: 5–22.Google Scholar
Osiek, Carolyn, and Balch, David L.. 1997. Families in the New Testament World: Households and House Churches. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Oster, Richard E. 1992. Use, Misuse and Neglect of Archaeological Evidence in Some Modern Works on 1 Corinthians (1 Cor 7,1–5, 8,10, 11,2–16, 12,14–26). ZNW 83: 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Angela N. 2020. Feminized-Minoritized Paul? A Womanist Reading of Paul’s Body in the Corinthian Context. In Minoritized Women Reading Race and Ethnicity: Intersectional Approaches to Constructed Identity and Early Christian Texts, eds. Smith, M. J. and Choi, J. Y., 71–87. Lanham: Lexington.Google Scholar
Parkin, Tim G. 1992. Demography and Roman Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Parkin, Tim G. 1995. Review of Roger S. Bagnall and Bruce W. Frier, The Demography of Roman Egypt. Bryn Mawr Classical Review 6.2: 88–89.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J., Rea, J. R., et al., eds. 1968. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 33. London: Egypt Exploration Society in Graeco-Roman Memoirs.Google Scholar
Pearson, Birger A. 1972. Jesus’ Teachings as Regulations in the Early Church. Interpretation 26: 348–51.Google Scholar
Pearson, Birger A. 1990. Gnosticism, Judaism, and Egyptian Christianity. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Peppiatt, Lucy. 2015. Women and Worship at Corinth: Paul’s Rhetorical Arguments in 1 Corinthians. Eugene, OR: Cascade.Google Scholar
Pertusi, Augustinus, ed. 1955. Scholia vetera in Hesiodi Opera et dies. Milano: Società Editrice ‘Vita e Pensiero’.Google Scholar
Plunkett, Mark A. 1988. Sexual Ethics and the Christian Life; A Study of 1 Corinthians 6:12–7:7. PhD diss., Princeton Theological Seminary.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Sarah B. 1984. Copronyms and the Exposure of Infants in Egypt. In Studies in Memory of A. Arthur Schiller, eds. Bagnall, R. and Harris, W. V., 147–62. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Sarah B. 1993. Infanticide in Hellenistic Greece. In Images of Women in Antiquity, 2nd ed., 207–22. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prior, David. 1985. The Message of 1 Corinthians: Life in the Local Church. Leicester: IVP.Google Scholar
Procopé, J. F. 1989. Democritus on Politics and the Care of the Soul. Classical Quarterly 39: 307–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pudsey, April Jayne. 2007. Sex, Statistics and Soldiers. New Approaches to the Demography of Roman Egypt, 28 B.C.–259 A.D. PhD diss., Faculty of Humanities, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Ramsay, William M. 1900. Historical Commentary on the Epistles to the Corinthians. The Expositor 6.1: 19–31, 91–111, 203–17, 273–89, 380–87.Google Scholar
Rathbone, Dominic. 1990. Villages, Land and Population in Graeco-Roman Egypt. PCPhS 216: 103–42.Google Scholar
Rawson, Beryl, ed. 1986. The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives. London: Croon Helm.Google Scholar
Reed, David A. 2015. Paul on Marriage and Singleness: Reading 1 Corinthians with the Augustan Marriage Laws. PhD thesis, Toronto School of Theology.Google Scholar
Reed, Jonathan. 2010. Instability in Jesus’ Galilee: A Demographic Perspective. Journal of Biblical Literature 129.2: 343–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. 2005. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Audrey N. M. 1956. The Cynic Conception of Αυταρκεια. Mnemosyne 9: 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Philip J. 1984. Recent Sociological Approaches to the Study of the New Testament. Religion 14: 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riesner, Rainer. 1998. Paul’s Early Period: Chronology, Mission Strategy, Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Rife, Joseph L. 2010. Religion and Society at Roman Kenchreai. In Corinth in Context: Comparative Studies on Religion and Society, eds. Friesen, Steven J., Schowalter, Daniel N., and Walters, James C., 391–432. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Vernon K. 1995. Social-Scientific Criticism and Literary Studies. In Modelling Εarly Christianity, ed. Esler, P., 274–89. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. T. 1919. A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research. 3rd ed. Leicester: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Robertson, Archibald, and Plummer, Alfred. 1914. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the First Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Robinson, James M. 1971. Kerygma and History in the New Testament. In Trajectories through Early Christianity, 20–71. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jonathan Rivett. 2018. The Argument against Attributing Slogans in 1 Corinthians 6:12–20. JSPL 8.1–2: 147–66.Google Scholar
Rosati, Gianpiero. 2009. The Latin Reception of Hesiod. In Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, eds. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C., 343–74. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rosner, Brian S. 1994. Paul, Scripture and Ethics: A Study of 1 Corinthians 5–7. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums, vol. 22. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosner, Brian S. 1998. Temple Prostitution in 1 Corinthians 6:12–20. Novum Testamentum 40: 336–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossing, B. R. 2005. Prophets, Prophetic Movements, and the Voices of Women. In Christian Origins, ed. Horsley, R. A., vol. 1, 261–86. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Rostovtzeff, Mikhail Ivanovich. 1957. Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rousselle, Aline. 1992. Body Politics in Ancient Rome. In A History of Women in the West, ed. Schmitt Pantel, P., 296–336. Cambridge: Belknap.Google Scholar
Roy, P. 1985. Antisthenes’ Affairs with Athenian Women. Liverpool Classical Monthly 10.9: 132–33.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D. 1985. Aphrodite à Corinthe: réflexions sur une idée reçue. Revue Biblique 92: 359–74.Google Scholar
Sampley, J. P. 1980. Pauline Partnership in Christ: Christian Community & Commitment in Light of Roman Law. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Sandnes, Karl O. 2002. Belly and Body in the Pauline Epistles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, Walter. 1996. What’s in an Age? A Comparative View of Bias in the Census Returns of Roman Egypt. BASP 33: 25–59.Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter. 2001. Death on the Nile: Disease and the Demography of Roman Egypt. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, Walter. 2007a. Epigraphy and Demography: Birth, Marriage, Family, and Death. Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics. Stanford University, 1–25.Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter. 2007b. The Roman Slave Supply. Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics, Stanford University, 1–22.Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter, and Friesen, Steven J.. 2009. The Size of the Economy and the Distribution of Income in the Roman Empire. JRS 99: 61–91.Google Scholar
Schmithals, Walter. 1971. Gnosticism in Corinth. Translated by J. E. Steely. New York: Abingdon.Google Scholar
Schnabel, Eckhard J. 2006. Der erste Brief des Paulus an die Korinther. Brunnen: R. Brockhaus Verlag Wuppertal.Google Scholar
Schniewind, Julius. 1952. Die Leugnung der Auferstehung in Korinth. In Nachgelassene Reden und Aufsätze, ed. Kähler, E., 110–39. Berlin: Töpelmann.Google Scholar
Schofield, Roger. 1985. The Impact of Scarcity and Plenty on Population Change in England, 1541–1871. In Hunger and History: The Impact of Changing Food Production and Consumption Patterns on Society, eds. Rotberg, R. I. and Rabb, T. K., 67–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schrage, Wolfgang. 1964. Die Stellung zur Welt bei Paulus, Epiktet und in der Apokalyptik: ein Beitrag zu 1 Kor 7:29–31. ZTK 61.2: 125–54.Google Scholar
Schrage, Wolfgang. 1976. Zur Frontstellung der paulinischen Ehebewertung in 1 Kor 7 1–7. ZNW 67: 214–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrage, Wolfgang. 1995. Der erste Brief an die Korinther 2. Teilband 1Kor 6,12–11,16. Evangelisch-Katholischer Kommentar. Düsseldorf: Benziger Verlag.Google Scholar
Schreckenberg, Heinz. 1964. Ananke: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Wortgebrauchs. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Schreiner, T. R. 2018. 1 Corinthians: An Introduction and Commentary. Nottingham: IVP.Google Scholar
Schroeder, C. T. 2014. Women in Anchoritic and Semi-Anchoritic Monasticism in Egypt: Rethinking the Landscape. Church History 83.1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Frederic M. 2004. Philodemus: Avocatio and the Pathos of Distance in Lucretius and Vergil. In Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans, ed. Armstrong, D., 139–56. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schwegler, Albert. 1846. Das nachapostolische Zeitalter in den Hauptmomenten seiner Entwicklung. 2 vols. Tübingen: L. F. Fues.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Albert. 1912. Paul and His Interpreters. Translated by W. Montgomery. London: A. C. Black.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Albert. 1953. The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle. Translated by W. Montgomery. 2nd ed. London: A. C. Black.Google Scholar
Scranton, Robert. 1951. Monuments in the Lower Agora and North of the Archaic Temple, Corinth 1.3. Princeton: ASCSA.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1998a. The Inferential Foundations of Epicurean Ethics. In Ethics, ed. Everson, S., 129–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1998b. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senft, Christophe. 1979. La première épître de Saint-Paul aux Corinthiens. Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar
Shaw, Brent. 1992. Explaining Incest: Brother-Sister Marriage in Graeco-Roman Egypt. Man 27: 267–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, David. 1987. The Love Poetry of Philodemus. American Journal of Philology 108: 310–24.Google Scholar
Sider, David. 1997. The Epigrams of Philodemus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebenmann, Paul Charles. 1997. The Question of Slogans in 1 Corinthians. Department of Religion. PhD diss., Baylor University.Google Scholar
Siker, Jeffrey S., and Mitchell, Margaret M.. 1993. The Corinthian Women Prophets: A Reconstruction through Paul’s Rhetoric. In Religious Studies Review. 19.4: 305–11.Google Scholar
Singer, Irving. 1965–66. Love in Ovid and Lucretius. The Hudson Review 18.4: 537–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sipe, A. W. Richard. 2000. Celibacy. In The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought, ed. Hastings, A., 104–5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smallwood, E. M., ed. 1967. Documents Illustrating the Principates of Gaius Claudius and Nero. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smelik, K. A. D., and Hemelrijk, E. A.. 1984. ‘Who Knows Not What Monsters Demented Egypt Worships?’ Opinions on Egyptian Animal Worship in Antiquity as Part of the Ancient Conception of Egypt. In ANRW. Vol. II.17.4, 1853–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Martin F. 1992. Introduction. In Lucretius: On the Nature of Things, ed. Smith, M. F., ix–lvii. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Shanell T. 2019. ‘She Did That!’: Female Agency in New Testament Texts – A Womanist Response. In Oxford Handbook of New Testament, Gender, and Sexuality, ed. Dunning, B. H., 157–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sobo, Elisa J., and Bell, Sandra, eds. 2001. Celibacy, Culture and Society: The Anthropology of Sexual Abstinence. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Spawforth, Anthony J. S. 1996. Roman Corinth: The Formation of a Colonial Elite. In Roman Onomastics in the Greek East Social and Political Aspects, ed. Rizakis, A. D., 167–82. Paris: Diffusion De Boccard.Google Scholar
Spurgeon, Andrew B. 2017. 1 Corinthians: An Exegetical and Contextual Commentary. Bangalore: Primalogue.Google Scholar
Stanley, Arthur Penrhyn. 1876. The Epistles of St. Paul to the Corinthians. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Stanley, C. D. 1990. Paul and Homer, Greco–Roman Citation Practice in the 1st Century. Novum Testamentum 32.1: 48–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Chester G. 1955. Virgil’s Acceptance of Octavian. The American Journal of Philology 76: 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearns, John B. 1936. Epicurus and Lucretius on Love. The Classical Journal 31: 343–51.Google Scholar
Stegemann, Ekkehard W., and Stegemann, Wolfgang. 1999. The Jesus Movement: A Social History of Its First Century. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Storey, Glenn R., and Paine, Richard R.. 1999. Latin Funerary Inscriptions: Another Attempt at Demographic Analysis. In XI congresso internazionale di epigrafia greca e Latina, vol. 1, 847–62. Rome: Edizioni Quasar.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley Kent. 1981. A ‘Debate’ over Freedom: 1 Corinthians 6:12–20. In Christian Teaching: Studies in Honor of LeMoine G. Lewis, ed. Ferguson, E., 59–71. Abilene: Abilene Christian University.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley Kent. 2011. Does Pauline Christianity Resemble a Hellenistic Philosophy? In Redescribing Paul and the Corinthians, eds. Cameron, Ron and Miller, Merrill, 219–43. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Strack, Hermann L., and Billerbeck, Paul. 1928. Kommentar Zum Neuen Aus Talmud und Midrasch. Band 4, 1–2, Exkurse zu einzelnen Stellen des Neuen Testaments. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela. 1996. Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strubbe, J. H. M. 1989. The Sitonia in the Cities of Asia Minor under the Principate (II). Epigraphica Anatolica 13: 99–122.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. 1982. Tibullus and Propertius. In Ancient Writers Greece and Rome, ed. Luce, T. J., vol. 2, 765–82. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Swan, P. M. 1976. A Consular Epicurean under the Early Principate. Phoenix 30: 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, Reuben J., ed. 2003. New Testament Greek Manuscripts: 1 Corinthians. Wheaton: Tyndale House.Google Scholar
Szilágyi, J. 1961. Beiträge zur Statistik der Sterblichkeit in den westeuropäischen Provinzen des römischen Imperiums. Acta Archaeologica 13: 125–55.Google Scholar
Szilágyi, J. 1963. Die Sterblichkeit in den Städten mittel- und süd-italiens sowie in Hispanien. Acta Archaeologica 15: 129–224.Google Scholar
Szilágyi, J. 1965. Die Sterblichkeit in den nordafrikanischen Provinzen I. Acta Archaeologica 17: 309–34.Google Scholar
Szilágyi, J. 1967. Die Sterblichkeit in den nordafrikanischen Provinzen III. Acta Archaeologica 19: 25–50.Google Scholar
Tait, Jane I. M. 1941. Philodemus’ Influence on the Latin Poets. Bryn Mawr: Bryn Mawr College Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1999. The Atomists Leucippus and Democritus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Terry, Ralph Bruce. 1995. A Discourse Analysis of First Corinthians. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Thackeray, H. St. J. 1900. The Relation of St. Paul to Contemporary Jewish Thought. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thaden, Robert H. von Jr. 2007. The Wisdom of Fleeing Porneia: Conceptual Blending in 1 Corinthians 6:12–7:7. PhD diss., Graduate Division of Religion, Emory University.Google Scholar
Thaden, Robert H. von Jr. 2017. Sex, Christ, and Embodied Cognition: Paul’s Wisdom for Corinth. Atlanta: SBL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theissen, Gerd. 1982. The Social Setting of Pauline Christianity. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Thiselton, Anthony. 2000. The First Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. The New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Tidball, Derek J. 1985. On Wooing a Crocodile: An Historical Survey of the Relationship between Sociology and New Testament Studies. Vox Evangelica 15: 95–109.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Mary Ann. 1999. Asceticism and Mark’s Gospel. In Asceticism and the New Testament, eds. Vaage, L. E. and Wimbush, V. L., 29–48. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trapp, Michael. 2007. Philosophy in the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics and Society. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Trebilco, Paul R. 2017. Outsider Designations and Boundary Construction in the New Testament: Early Christian Communities and the Formation of Group Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. 1991. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouna, Voula. 2007. The Ethics of Philodemus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, J. Brian. 2011. Remain in Your Calling: Paul and the Continuation of Social Identities in 1 Corinthians. Eugene, OR: Pickwick.Google Scholar
Tutrone, Fabio. 2021. A View from the Garden: Contemplative Isolation and Constructive Sociability in Lucretius and in the Epicurean Tradition. In Being Alone in Antiquity: Greco-Roman Ideas and Experiences of Misanthropy, Isolation and Solitude, ed. Rafał, Matuszewski, 201–28. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vaage, Leif E., and Wimbush, Vincent L.. 1999. Asceticism and the New Testament. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Valentine, Katy E. 2013. 1 Corinthians 7 in Light of Ancient Rhetoric of Self-control. Review & Expositor 110.4: 577–90.Google Scholar
Vos, Craig S. 1999a. Church and Community Conflicts: The Relationships of the Thessalonian, Corinthian, and Philippian Churches with Their Wider Civic Communities. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Vos, Johan S. 1999b. Argumentation und Situation in 1 Kor 15. Novum Testamentum 41.4: 313–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. 1981. Family and Inheritance in the Augustinian Marriage Laws. PCPhS 27: 58–80.Google Scholar
Warren, James. 2002. Epicurus and Democritean Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warwick, R. 1968. The Skeletal Remains. In The Romano-British Cemetery at Trentholme Drive, York, ed. Wenham, L. P., 113–26. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Watts, Dorothy J. 1989. Infant Burials and Romano-British Christianity. The Archaeological Journal 146: 372–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Dorothy J. 2001. The Silent Majority: Women in Romano-British Cemeteries. The Archaeological Journal 158: 332–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, P. R. C. 1972. Familia Caesaris. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, P. R. C. 1990. Where Have All the Junian Latins Gone? Nomenclature and Status in the Early Empire. Chiron 20: 275–305.Google Scholar
Wedderburn, A. J. M. 1987. Baptism and Resurrection: Studies in Pauline Theology against Its Greco-Roman Background. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Wells, Calvin. 1982. The Human Burials. In Romano-British Cemeteries at Cirencester, eds. McWhirr, A., Viner, L., and Wells, C., 135–202. Cirencester: Cirencester Excavation Committee.Google Scholar
Wendland, Heinz-Dietrich. 1965. Die Briefe an die Korinther. Göttingen: Vandenhoed & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Wenham, David. 1984. Paul’s Use of the Jesus Tradition. In The Jesus Tradition outside the Gospels, 7–37. Sheffield: JSOT.Google Scholar
Wenham, David. 1995. Paul: Follower of Jesus or Founder of Christianity? Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
West, Allen Brown. 1931. Corinth: Volume VIII, Part II: Latin Inscriptions 1896–1926. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
West, S. E., and Plouviez, Judith. 1976. The Romano-British Site at Icklingham. East Anglian Archaeology 3: 63–125.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Ulrich von, ed. 1962. Hesiodos Erga. 2nd ed. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Williams, C. K. II. 1994. Roman Corinth as a Commerical Center. In The Corinthia in the Roman Period, ed. Gregory, T. E., 31–46. Ann Arbor: Cushing-Malloy.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael Allen. 1996. Rethinking ‘Gnosticism’. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. M. 1982. Gnosis at Corinth. In Paul and Paulinism: Essays in Honor of C. K. Barrett, eds. Hooker, M. D. and Wilson, S. G., 102–14. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Wimbush, Vincent L. 1987. Paul, the Worldly Ascetic: Response to the World and Self-Understanding According to 1 Cor. 7. Macon: Mercer.Google Scholar
Wimbush, Vincent L. 1990. Ascetic Behavior in Greco-Roman Antiquity: A Sourcebook. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Wimbush, Vincent L., and Valantasis, Richard. 1995. Asceticism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winer, G. B. 1882. A Treatise on the Grammar of New Testament Greek. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Winter, Bruce W. 1989. Secular and Christian Responses to Corinthian Famines. TB 40: 86–106.Google Scholar
Winter, Bruce W. 1994a. Acts and Food Shortages. In The Book of Acts in its Graeco-Roman Setting, eds. Gill, D. W. J. and Gempf, C., vol. 2, 59–78. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Winter, Bruce W. 1994b. Social Mobility: 1 Cor 7:17–24. In Seek the Welfare of the City, 145–64. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Winter, Bruce W. 1997a. Gluttony and Immorality at Elitist Banquets: The Background to 1 Corinthians 6:12–20. Jian Dao 7: 77–90.Google Scholar
Winter, Bruce W. 1997b. St Paul as a Critic of Roman Slavery in 1 Corinthians 7:21–23. In St. Paul and the European Civilization: Proceedings of the International Congress, Veria 26–28 June 1997, ed. Karavidopoulos, I., vol. 3, 337–54. Veria: International Congress.Google Scholar
Winter, Bruce W. 1998. Puberty or Passion? The Referent of ΥΠΕΡΑΚΜΟΣ in 1 Corinthians 7:36. TB 49.1: 71–89.Google Scholar
Wire, Antoinette Clark. 1990. The Corinthian Woman Prophets: A Reconstruction through Paul’s Rhetoric. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Wire, Antoinette Clark. 1994. 1 Corinthians. In Searching the Scriptures: A Feminist Commentary, ed. Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler, vol. 2, 153–95. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Wiseman, James. 1979. Corinth and Rome I: 228 B.C.–A.D. 267. In ANRW. Vol. 7.1, 439–547.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben. 1981. Rite and Rights for Women – Galatians 3.28. NTS 27.5: 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witherington, Ben. 1988. Women in the Earliest Churches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witherington, Ben. 1995. Conflict and Community in Corinth: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on 1 and 2 Corinthians. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1996. Der erste Brief des Paulus an die Korinther. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Woolf, Greg. 1997. The Roman Urbanization of the East. In The Early Roman Empire in the East, ed. Alcock, S. E., 1–14. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, O. Larry. 1985. Not Like the Gentiles: Marriage Rules in the Letters of Paul. SBL Dissertation Series. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Zeller, Dieter. 2010. Der erste Brief an die Korinther. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. 1868. Socrates and the Socratic Schools. Translated by O. J. Reichel. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. 1892. The Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics. Translated by O. J. Reichel. Rev. ed. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. 1897. Aristotle and the Earlier Peripatetics. Translated by B. F. C. Costelloe and J. H. Muirhead. Vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar