Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface: the new Pleistocene
- Foreword
- Part I Definition of the base of the Quaternary
- Part II Characterization of the Pleistocene boundary-stratotype
- Part III The paleontological context of the Pleistocene boundary
- Part IV The Pleistocene boundary in regional sequences
- 11 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in Italy
- 12 Stratigraphy of the Plio–Pleistocene sequence of the Mediterranean coastal belt of Israel and its implications for the evolution of the Nile Cone
- 13 The Pliocene–Pleistocene transition in the Iberian Peninsula
- 14 Biostratigraphy and calibrated climatic chronology of the Upper Pliocene and Lower Pleistocene of France
- 15 The Plio–Pleistocene of England and Iceland
- 16 The Neogene–Ouaternary boundary in The Netherlands
- 17 The Tertiary–Quaternary boundary in western Germany
- 18 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in eastern Germany
- 19 The Plio–Pleistocene of Hungary
- 20 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in Romania
- 21 The Pliocene and Pleistocene of the European part of the Commonwealth of Independent States
- 22 The N/Q boundary in Asian Russia and Tadjikistan
- 23 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in the Indian subcontinent
- 24 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in Japan: the Osaka Group, Kinki district
- 25 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in Japan: stratigraphy in the Boso Peninsula, central Japan
- 26 The base of the Quaternary in China
- 27 Plio–Pleistocene deposits and the Quaternary boundary in sub-Saharan Africa
- 28 Plio–Pleistocene reference sections in Indonesia
- 29 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in New Zealand
- 30 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in continental sequences of North America
- Index
21 - The Pliocene and Pleistocene of the European part of the Commonwealth of Independent States
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface: the new Pleistocene
- Foreword
- Part I Definition of the base of the Quaternary
- Part II Characterization of the Pleistocene boundary-stratotype
- Part III The paleontological context of the Pleistocene boundary
- Part IV The Pleistocene boundary in regional sequences
- 11 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in Italy
- 12 Stratigraphy of the Plio–Pleistocene sequence of the Mediterranean coastal belt of Israel and its implications for the evolution of the Nile Cone
- 13 The Pliocene–Pleistocene transition in the Iberian Peninsula
- 14 Biostratigraphy and calibrated climatic chronology of the Upper Pliocene and Lower Pleistocene of France
- 15 The Plio–Pleistocene of England and Iceland
- 16 The Neogene–Ouaternary boundary in The Netherlands
- 17 The Tertiary–Quaternary boundary in western Germany
- 18 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in eastern Germany
- 19 The Plio–Pleistocene of Hungary
- 20 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in Romania
- 21 The Pliocene and Pleistocene of the European part of the Commonwealth of Independent States
- 22 The N/Q boundary in Asian Russia and Tadjikistan
- 23 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in the Indian subcontinent
- 24 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in Japan: the Osaka Group, Kinki district
- 25 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in Japan: stratigraphy in the Boso Peninsula, central Japan
- 26 The base of the Quaternary in China
- 27 Plio–Pleistocene deposits and the Quaternary boundary in sub-Saharan Africa
- 28 Plio–Pleistocene reference sections in Indonesia
- 29 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in New Zealand
- 30 The Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in continental sequences of North America
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Within western Russia and the adjoining states, the Upper Pliocene and Quaternary (Anthropogene) sequences are abundantly documented in terms of fossil mammals, marine and fresh-water mollusks, foraminifera, ostracodes, macro- and microflora, and remains of human occupation, as well as extensive data on neotectonics, lithology, and paleomagnetism. For many years, however, the stratigraphers in that vast region did not share a unified point of view on the location of the lower boundary of the Quaternary. Although the majority considered that the lower boundary of the Quaternary should be correlated to the base of the Bakuan Stage, some favored the base of the Akchagylian Stage, whereas others preferred the base of the Apsheronian.
At a joint meeting of the IGCP-41 working group and INQUA Subcommission 1-d at the XI INQUA Congress in Moscow in 1984, the proposal was adopted to place the Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary, and thus the Neogene-Quaternary (N/Q) boundary, in a physical reference point, or boundary-stratotype, at Vrica, Calabria, located at the base of the claystone layer conformably overlying sapropelic marker e in component-section B of Selli et al. (1977) (Aguirre and Pasini, 1985). According to Tauxe et al. (1983), with slight modification by Zijderveld et al. (1991), that level is close to the top of the Olduvai normal-polarity subchron. Following that concept, the N/Q boundary should be located somewhere in the lower part of the Apsheronian beds of the Caspian Basin and their stratigraphic equivalents. That boundary level has now been officially accepted by stratigraphic workers in the former USSR.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Pleistocene Boundary and the Beginning of the Quaternary , pp. 221 - 226Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1996