Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:16:19.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Organizational change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Dean Tjosvold
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Barbara Wisse
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

If we review the finance section of any newspaper, we are bound to find news about changing business structures (merging, downsizing, acquisition or expansion), or changes in the way things are done or organizations are managed (implementing new technologies, flattening of hierarchies, standardization of production based on quality criteria, etc.). These past few years have been particularly prolific in terms of business mergers and takeovers. According to market analysts Thomson Financial, the value of business mergers and takeovers in 2006 totaled 3.79 billion dollars, representing an increase of 38 percent compared to 2005. To give some examples, the pharmaceutical multinational Pfizer is to close several research centers and factories around the world, laying off nearly 10,000 workers as a reaction to the increased competition from new pharmaceutical companies offering generic alternatives. As for business takeovers, there are the examples of Google's takeover of YouTube or AT&T's of BellSouth. Everything suggests that 2007 and 2008 will be particularly busy in terms of business mergers and takeovers in key economic sectors, such as electricity in Europe (ENEL and Endesa or Suez-Gaz de France), or the car industry worldwide. In short, changing business patterns in strategic sectors of the economy, caused by pressure on organizations to adapt to changing market demands, has accelerated sharply in recent years as a result of globalization and market competition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. S. (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. II, pp. 267–299), New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bass, B. (1985) Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics, 13, 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordia, P., Hobman, E., Jones, E., Gallois, C., and Callan, V. J. (2004a) Uncertainty during organizational change: Types, consequences and management strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 507–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordia, P., Hunt, E., Paulsen, N., Tourish, D., and DiFonzo, N. (2004b) Uncertainty during organizational change: Is it all about control?European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., and Bies, R. J. (1994) Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 397–409.Google Scholar
Brotheridge, C. M. (2003) The role of fairness in mediating the effects of voice and justification on stress and other outcome in climate of organizational change. International Journal of Stress Management, 10, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, R. J. and Greenglass, E. R. (2001) Hospital restructuring and nursing staff well-being: The role of perceived hospital and union support. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 14, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, P. P., Carson, K. D., and Roe, C. (1993) Social power bases: A meta-analytic examination of interrelationships and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1150–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, P. T. and Voronov, M. (2003) Power in group and organizations. In West, M., Tjosvold, D., and Smith, K. G. (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 229–254), Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Conger, J. and Kanungo, R. N. (1988) Charismatic leadership in organizations, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R. and Folger, R. (1991) Procedural justice and worker motivation. In Steers, R. M. and Porter, L. W. (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior, 5th edn (pp. 131–143), New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cremer, D. and Knippenberg, D. (2002) How do leaders promote cooperation: The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 858–866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreu, C. K., Gielbels, E., and Vliert, E. (1998) Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects on punitive capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 408–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, E. B. and Goldberg, S. G. (1999) Challenging “resistance to change.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiFonzo, N., Bordia, P., and Rosnow, R. L. (1994) Reining in rumours. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorriots, B. and Johansson, I. L. (1999) Communicative power: A linguistic approach to the study of microdynamics of organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 15, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., and Herold, D. M. (2006) The effect of organizational changes on employee commitment: A multilevel investigation. Personnel Psychology, 59, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiol, C. M. (2002) Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organization Science, 13, 653–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, J. R. P. and Raven, B. H. (1959) The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167), Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. (2003) Social identity. In Leary, M. R. and Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462–479), New York, N.Y.: The Gilford Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. and Reid, S. A. (2001) Social identity, leadership and power. In Lee-Chai, A. Y. and Bargh, J. A. (Eds.), The Use and Abuse of Power (pp. 159–180), Ann Arbor, Mich.: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. and Vaughan, G. M. (1995) Social psychology: An introduction, London: Prentice-Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Hollander, E. P. (1985) Conformity, status and idiosyncratic credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, H. C. (1961) Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, J. M. and Smewing, C. (2001) The role of the supervisor in career and organizational commitment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipnis, D. (1984) The use of power in organizations and in interpersonal settings. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 5, 179–210.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. (1995) Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 57, 106–114.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. (2002) The heart of change: Real-life stories of how people change their organization, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. and Schlesinger, L. A. (1979) Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 41, 59–67.Google Scholar
Ledford, G. E., Mohrman, S. A., Mohrman, A. M., and Lawler, E. E. (1990) The phenomenon of large-scale organizational change. In Mohrman, A. M. et al. (Eds.), Large scale organizational change (pp. 1–31), San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Leventhal, G. (1980) What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen, K., Greenburg, M., and Wills, R. (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55), New York, N.Y.: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, L. K. and Seibold, D. R. (1998) Reconceptualizing organizational change implementation as a communication problem: A review of literature and research agenda. In Roloff, M. E. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. XXI, pp. 93–151), Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Lindskold, S. and Aronoff, J. (1980) Conciliatory strategies and relative power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., and Sivasubramanian, N. (1996) Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, S. R., Miller, D., and John, C. (2005) Readiness for organizational change: Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference?Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15 (2), 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mael, F. A. and Ashforth, B. E. (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. (1970) Problem solving and creativity: In individuals and groups, Monterey, Calif.: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
Miller, V. D., Johnson, J. R., and Grau, J. (1994) Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., and Strange, J. M. (2002) Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munduate, L. and Bennebroeck-Gravenhorst, K. (2003) Power dynamics and organizational change. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novelli, L., Kirkman, B. L., and Shapiro, D. L. (1995) Effective implementation of organizational change: An organizational justice perspective. In Cooper, C. and Rousseau, D. (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (Vol. II, pp. 15–36), John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Oreg, S. (2006) Personality, context and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piderit, S. K. (2000) Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 783–794Google Scholar
Rafferty, A. E. and Griffin, M. A. (2006) Perception of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1154–1162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, B. H. (1999) Reflections on interpersonal influence and social power in experimental social psychology. In Rodrigues, A. and Levine, R. (Eds.), Reflections on 100 years of experimental social psychology (pp. 114–134), New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., and Austin, J. T. (1997) Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 48–59.Google Scholar
Salam, S. C. (2004) Foster trust through competence, honesty, and integrity. In Locke, E. A. (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behaviour (pp. 274–288), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schweiger, D. M. and DeNisi, A. S. (1991) Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 110–135.Google Scholar
Somech, A. and Drach-Zahavy, A. (2002) Relative power and influence strategy: The effects of agent/target organizational power on superior's choices of influence strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E. (2002) Employee control and occupational stress. American Psychological Society, 11, 153–166.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In Worchel, S. and Austin, L. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, Chicago, Ill.: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D. (2000) Power in cooperative and competitive organizational contexts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, B. A. and Russell, R. F. (2004) The influence of the transformational leader. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 10, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C. (2005) Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. and Blader, S. L. (2000) Cooperation in groups, Philadelphia, Pa.: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., and Blader, S. L. (2003) The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. and Cremer, D. (2005) Process-based leadership: Fair procedures and reactions to organizational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 529–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knippenberg, B., Martin, L., and Tyler, T. (2006) Process-orientation versus outcome orientation during organizational change: The role of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knippenberg, D., Knippenberg, B., and Bobbio, A. (2008) Leaders as agents of continuity: Collective self-consistency and resistance to change. In Sani, F. (Ed.), Self Continuity: Individual and collective perspectives (pp. 175–187), Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wanberg, C. R. and Banas, J. T. (2000) Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 85, 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., and Austin, J. T. (2000) Cynicism about organizational change: Measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group and Organization Management, 25, 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. and Quinn, R. E. (1999) Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, M. A., Hirst, G., Richter, A., and Shipton, H. (2004) Twelve steps to heaven: Successfully managing change through developing innovative teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. (2006) Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. and Falbe, C. M. (1991) The importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. and Tracey, J. B. (1992) Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G., Gordon, A., and Taber, T. (2002) A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behaviour research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×