Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- List of Authors
- PART I THEORETICAL AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSES
- Analytical and Comparative Report
- Economic Analysis
- PART II PRESCRIPTION IN TORT LAW OUTLINED
- Case Scenarios
- Austria
- Belgium
- Czech Republic
- England and Wales
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Italy
- The Netherlands
- Norway
- Poland
- South Africa
- Spain
- Switzerland
- United States
- European Union
- Appendix: Questionnaire
- About the Editors
Case Scenarios
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 December 2020
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- List of Authors
- PART I THEORETICAL AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSES
- Analytical and Comparative Report
- Economic Analysis
- PART II PRESCRIPTION IN TORT LAW OUTLINED
- Case Scenarios
- Austria
- Belgium
- Czech Republic
- England and Wales
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Italy
- The Netherlands
- Norway
- Poland
- South Africa
- Spain
- Switzerland
- United States
- European Union
- Appendix: Questionnaire
- About the Editors
Summary
Case 1
(Failure to ensure the wearing of a ski helmet) : D, a ski instructor, negligently fails to make sure that all skiers in her‘off -piste‘group wear helmets. P, a skier in the group, hits a tree. P immediately suff ers head injury X, and years later another head injury Y that developed from the same accident.
An. and Comp. Report ……….. 26 Germany ……………… 349 Poland …………… 529
Austria ……………………………… 147 Greece …………………. 386 South Africa ….. 559
Belgium ……………………………. 189 Italy ……………………… 422 Spain ……………… 589
Czech Republic ………………… 224 Netherlands …………. 457 Switzerland ……. 627
France ………………………………. 316 Norway ………………… 488 United States …. 662
Case 2
(Three mistakes during one treatment) : Physician D treats patient P negligently and performs three mistakes on the day of the treatment: A, B and C. Mistake A causes harm X after a year. Mistake B causes harm Y after two years. Mistakes A and C together cause harm Z after three years.
An. and Comp. Report ……….. 29 Germany ……………… 349 Poland …………… 529
Austria ……………………………… 149 Greece …………………. 387 South Africa ….. 559
Belgium ……………………………. 188 Italy ……………………… 422 Spain ……………… 590
Czech Republic ………………… 224 Netherlands …………. 457 Switzerland ……. 627
France ………………………………. 317 Norway ………………… 489 United States …. 664
Case 3
(Consecutive harms from one injury) : Builder D lays down defective foundations for a building thereby creating the risk of future collapse. As a result, the value to the owner of the building (P) decreases (harm A). Two years later the foundation subsides and requires fixing paid by P (harm B). Three years later cracks appear in the building fixed by P (harm C). Four years later the building collapses (harm D).
An. and Comp. Report ……….. 30 Germany ……………… 350 Poland …………… 529
Austria ……………………………… 150 Greece …………………. 387 South Africa ….. 560
Belgium ……………………………. 176 Italy ……………………… 422 Spain ……………… 590
Czech Republic ………………… 225 Netherlands …………. 457 Switzerland ……. 628
France ………………………………. 317 Norway ………………… 489 United States …. 665
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Prescription in Tort LawAnalytical and Comparative Perspectives, pp. 135 - 138Publisher: IntersentiaPrint publication year: 2020