Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:20:07.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Studying Primate Cognition

From the Wild to Captivity and Back

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

By
Julia Fischer
Edited by
Bennett L. Schwartz  and
Michael J. Beran
Bennett L. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Michael J. Beran
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Get access

Summary

How do nonhuman primates process information about their social and physical world, and how do they make decisions? To address this question, research in the tradition of ethology and behavioral ecology aims to uncover how animals behave under ecological and evolutionarily valid conditions. By combining detailed observations of behavior in the wild with field experimentation, such studies have shed light on what primates know about predators, their home ranges and food sources, and their social environment. A second research stream takes non-naturalistic experiments into freely moving groups of wild or captive primates to test social learning, problem-solving skills, and motivation. Finally, captivity-based studies address a wide range of questions, using an array of different methodological approaches, often with the aim to explore the limits of the animals’ abilities. This chapter compares the strengths and the limitations of the different research streams and proposes an integrative approach to developing a profound understanding of primate cognition.

Keywords

comparative cognitiondevelopmental psychologyethologyexperimental psychologyfield studiesplaybackprimatesocial cognition
Type
Chapter
Information
Primate Cognitive Studies , pp. 609 - 631
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, D. B., & Kitchen, D. M. (2020). Model vs. playback experiments: The impact of sensory mode on predator-specific escape responses in saki monkeys. Ethology, 126, 563–575.Google Scholar
Almeling, L., Hammerschmidt, K., Sennhenn-Reulen, H., Freund, A. M., & Fischer, J. (2016). Motivational shifts in aging monkeys and the origins of social selectivity. Current Biology, 26, 1744–1749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, K., Pohlner, Y., & Zuberbühler, K. (2008). A forest monkey’s alarm call series to predator models. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 549–559.Google Scholar
Beran, M. J., Evans, T. A., Paglieri, F., McIntyre, J. M., Addessi, E., & Hopkins, W. D. (2014). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) can wait, when they choose to: A study with the hybrid delay task. Animal Cognition, 17, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, M., Agha, N. S., & Gail, A. (2020). Wireless recording from unrestrained monkeys reveals motor goal encoding beyond immediate reach in frontoparietal cortex. ELife, 9, e51322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergman, T. J., Beehner, J. C., Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (2003). Hierarchical classification by rank and kinship in baboons. Science, 302, 1234–1236.Google Scholar
Bliss-Moreau, E., & Baxter, M. G. (2019). Interest in non-social novel stimuli as a function of age in rhesus monkeys. Royal Society Open Science, 6, 182237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borgeaud, C., Alvino, M., van Leeuwen, K., Townsend, S. W., & Bshary, R. (2015). Age/sex differences in third-party rank relationship knowledge in wild vervet monkeys, Chlorocebus aethiops pygerythrus. Animal Behaviour, 102, 277–284.Google Scholar
Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425, 297–299.Google Scholar
Calapai, A., Berger, M., Niessing, M., Heisig, K., Brockhausen, R. R., Treue, S., & Gail, A. (2017). A cage-based training, cognitive testing and enrichment system optimized for rhesus macaques in neuroscience research. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 35–45.Google Scholar
Cäsar, C., Zuberbühler, K., Young, R. J., & Byrne, R. W. (2013). Titi monkey call sequences vary with predator location and type. Biology Letters, 9, 20130535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheney, D. L., Moscovice, L. R., Heesen, M., Mundry, R., & Seyfarth, R. M. (2010). Contingent cooperation between wild female baboons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 9562–9566.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1980). Vocal recognition in free-ranging vervet monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 28, 362–367.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1989). Redirected aggression and reconciliation among vervet monkeys, Cercopithecus aethiops. Behaviour, 110, 258–275.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., & Silk, J. B. (1995). The role of grunts in reconciling opponents and facilitating interactions among adult female baboons. Animal Behaviour, 50, 249–257.Google Scholar
Crockford, C., Wittig, R. M., Mundry, R., & Zuberbühler, K. (2012). Wild chimpanzees inform ignorant group members of danger. Current Biology, 22, 142–146.Google Scholar
Crockford, C., Wittig, R. M., & Zuberbühler, K. (2017). Vocalizing in chimpanzees is influenced by social-cognitive processes. Science Advances, 3, e1701742.Google Scholar
Cunningham, E., & Janson, C. (2007). Integrating information about location and value of resources by white-faced saki monkeys (Pithecia pithecia). Animal Cognition, 10, 293–304.Google Scholar
de Wit, S., & Dickinson, A. (2009). Associative theories of goal-directed behaviour: A case for animal–human translational models. Psychological Research, 73, 463–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelmann, J. M., Haux, L. M., & Herrmann, E. (2019). Helping in young children and chimpanzees shows partiality towards friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40, 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, J. M., & Herrmann, E. (2016). Chimpanzees trust their friends. Current Biology, 26, 252–256.Google Scholar
Evans, T. A., Beran, M. J., Paglieri, F., & Addessi, E. (2012). Delaying gratification for food and tokens in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): When quantity is salient, symbolic stimuli do not improve performance. Animal Cognition, 15, 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagot, J. (2009). Automatic testing of cognitive performance in baboons maintained in social groups. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 396–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faraut, L., Siviter, H., Pesco, F. D., & Fischer, J. (2019). How life in a tolerant society affects the usage of grunts: Evidence from female and male Guinea baboons. Animal Behaviour, 153, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrigno, S., Kornell, N., & Cantlon, J. F. (2017). A metacognitive illusion in monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20171541.Google Scholar
Fichtel, C. (2004). Reciprocal recognition of sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi) and redfronted lemur (Eulemur fulvus rufus) alarm calls. Animal Cognition, 7, 45–52.Google Scholar
Fichtel, C., Dinter, K., & Kappeler, P. M. (2020). The lemur baseline: How lemurs compare to monkeys and apes in the Primate Cognition Test Battery. PeerJ, 8, e10025.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. (2017). Monkeytalk: Inside the worlds and minds of primates. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, J., Noser, R., & Hammerschmidt, K. (2013). Bioacoustic field research: A primer to acoustic analyses and playback experiments with primates. American Journal of Primatology, 75, 643–663.Google Scholar
Fischer, J., & Price, T. (2017). Meaning, intention, and inference in primate vocal communication. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 82, 22–31.Google Scholar
Girard-Buttoz, C., Surbeck, M., Samuni, L., Tkaczynski, P., Boesch, C., Fruth, B., Wittig, R. M., Hohmann, G., & Crockford, C. (2020). Information transfer efficiency differs in wild chimpanzees and bonobos, but not social cognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287, 20200523.Google Scholar
Green, S. J., Boruff, B. J., Bonnell, T. R., & Grueter, C. C. (2020). Chimpanzees use least-cost routes to out-of-sight goals. Current Biology, 30, 4528–4533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, B., Call, J., Agnetta, B., & Tomasello, M. (2000). Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Animal Behaviour, 59, 771–785.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D. (1988). How infant vervet monkeys learn to recognize starling alarm calls: The role of experience. Behaviour, 105, 187–201.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., MacNeilage, P. F., & Ware, M. (1996). Numerical representations in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 1514–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haux, L. M., Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., & Hertwig, R. (2021). How chimpanzees decide in the face of social and nonsocial uncertainty. Animal Behaviour, 173, 177–189.Google Scholar
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernández-Lloreda, M. v, Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317, 1360–1366.Google Scholar
Hobaiter, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2014). The meanings of chimpanzee gestures. Current Biology, 24, 1596–1600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inoue, S., & Matsuzawa, T. (2007). Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17, 1004–1005.Google Scholar
Joly, M., Ammersdörfer, S., Schmidtke, D., & Zimmermann, E. (2014). Touchscreen-based cognitive tasks reveal age-related impairment in a primate aging model, the grey mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). PLoS ONE, 9, e109393.Google Scholar
Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe. Cognition, 109, 224–234.Google Scholar
Keupp, S., Titchener, R., Bugnyar, T., Mussweiler, T., & Fischer, J. (2019). Competition is crucial for social comparison processes in long-tailed macaques. Biology Letters, 15, 20180784.Google Scholar
King, A. J., Douglas, C. M. S., Huchard, E., Isaac, N. J. B., & Cowlishaw, G. (2008). Dominance and affiliation mediate despotism in a social primate. Current Biology, 18, 1833–1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortlandt, A. (1975). Wild chimpanzees use clubs in fighting an animated stuffed leopard. In Nettleship, M. A., Givens, R. D., & Nettleship, A. (Eds.), War, its causes and correlates (pp. 297–298). Mouton.Google Scholar
Magrath, R. D., Haff, T. M., Mclachlan, J. R., Igic, B., Magrath, R. D., Haff, T. M., Mclachlan, J. R., & Igic, B. (2015). Wild birds learn to eavesdrop on heterospecific alarm calls. Current Biology, 25, 2047–2050.Google Scholar
ManyPrimates, Altschul, D. M., Beran, M. J., Bohn, M., Call, J., DeTroy, S., Duguid, S. J., Egelkamp, C. L., Fichtel, C., Fischer, J., Flessert, M., Hanus, D., Haun, D. B. M., Haux, L. M., Hernandez-Aguilar, R. A., Herrmann, E., Hopper, L. M., Joly, M., Kano, F., … & Watzek, J. (2019). Establishing an infrastructure for collaboration in primate cognition research. PLoS ONE, 14, e0223675.Google Scholar
Massen, J. J. M., van den Berg, L. M., Spruijt, B. M., & Sterck, E. H. M. (2012). Inequity aversion in relation to effort and relationship quality in long-tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis). American Journal of Primatology, 74, 145–156.Google Scholar
Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science, 311, 1297–1300.Google Scholar
Menzel, C. R. (1991). Cognitive aspects of foraging in Japanese monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 41, 397–402.Google Scholar
Moeller, S., Unakafov, A. M., Fischer, J., Gail, A., Treue, S., & Kagan, I. (2020). Human and macaque pairs coordinate differently in a dyadic decision game with face-to-face action visibility. BioRxiv, 983551.Google Scholar
Morgan, G., Kornell, N., Kornblum, T., & Terrace, H. S. (2014). Retrospective and prospective metacognitive judgments in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition, 17, 249–257.Google Scholar
Noser, R., & Byrne, R. W. (2010). How do wild baboons (Papio ursinus) plan their routes? Travel among multiple high-quality food sources with inter-group competition. Animal Cognition, 13, 145–155.Google Scholar
Okamoto-Barth, S., Moore, C., Barth, J., Subiaul, F., & Povinelli, D. J. (2011). Carryover effect of joint attention to repeated events in chimpanzees and young children. Developmental Science, 14, 440–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paxton Gazes, R., Brown, E. K., Basile, B. M., & Hampton, R. R. (2013). Automated cognitive testing of monkeys in social groups yields results comparable to individual laboratory-based testing. Animal Cognition, 16, 445–458.Google Scholar
Pika, S., & Mitani, J. C. (2006). Referential gestural communication in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Current Biology, 16, R191–R192.Google Scholar
Price, T., & Fischer, J. (2014). Meaning attribution in the West African green monkey: Influence of call type and context. Animal Cognition, 17, 277–286.Google Scholar
Rathke, E.-M., & Fischer, J. (2020). Differential ageing trajectories in motivation, inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility in Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375, 20190617.Google Scholar
Rendall, D., Rodman, P. S., & Emond, R. E. (1996). Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 51, 1007–1015.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. I., Roberts, S. G. B., & Vick, S.-J. (2014). The repertoire and intentionality of gestural communication in wild chimpanzees. Animal Cognition, 17, 317–336.Google Scholar
Rosati, A. G., Arre, A. M., Platt, M. L., & Santos, L. R. (2018). Developmental shifts in social cognition: Socio-emotional biases across the lifespan in rhesus monkeys. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schel, A. M., Townsend, S. W., Machanda, Z., Zuberbühler, K., & Slocombe, K. E. (2013). Chimpanzee alarm call production meets key criteria for intentionality. PLoS ONE, 8, e76674.Google Scholar
Schell, A., Rieck, K., Schell, K., Hammerschmidt, K., & Fischer, J. (2011). Adult but not juvenile Barbary macaques spontaneously recognize group members from pictures. Animal Cognition, 14, 503–509.Google Scholar
Schino, G., Tiddi, B., & di Sorrentino, E. P. (2006). Simultaneous classification by rank and kinship in Japanese macaques. Animal Behaviour, 71, 1069–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, V., Federspiel, I., Eckert, J., Keupp, S., Tschernek, L., Faraut, L., Schuster, R., Michels, C., Sennhenn-Reulen, H., Bugnyar, T., Mussweiler, T., & Fischer, J. (2016). Do monkeys compare themselves to others? Animal Cognition, 19, 417–428.Google Scholar
Schmitt, V., & Fischer, J. (2011). Representational format determines numerical competence in monkeys. Nature Communications, 2, 257.Google Scholar
Schmitt, V., Pankau, B., & Fischer, J. (2012). Old World monkeys compare to apes in the primate cognition test battery. PLoS ONE, 7, e32024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnoell, A. V., & Fichtel, C. (2012). Wild redfronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons) use social information to learn new foraging techniques. Animal Cognition, 15, 505–516.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2003). Signalers and receivers in animal communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 145–173.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2015). Social cognition. Animal Behaviour, 103, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., & Marler, P. (1980). Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science, 210, 801–803.Google Scholar
Silk, J. B. (1999). Male bonnet macaques use information about third-party rank relationships to recruit allies. Animal Behaviour, 58, 45–51.Google Scholar
Silk, J. B., Roberts, E. R., Städele, V., & Strum, S. C. (2018). To grunt or not to grunt: Factors governing call production in female olive baboons, Papio anubis. PLoS ONE, 13, e0204601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strandburg-Peshkin, A., Farine, D. R., Couzin, I. D., & Crofoot, M. C. (2015). Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons. Science, 348, 1358–1361.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, T. T. (1967). Auditory communication among vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). In Altmann, S. A. (Ed.), Social communication among primates (pp. 281–324). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
van de Waal, E., Borgeaud, C., & Whiten, A. (2013). Potent social learning and conformity shape a wild primate’s foraging decisions. Science, 340, 483–485.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, E. J. C., DeTroy, S. E., Kaufhold, S. P., Dubois, C., Schütte, S., Call, J., & Haun, D. B. M. (2021). Chimpanzees behave prosocially in a group-specific manner. Science Advances, 7, eabc7982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voinov, P. v., Call, J., Knoblich, G., Oshkina, M., & Allritz, M. (2020). Chimpanzee coordination and potential communication in a two-touchscreen turn-taking game. Scientific Reports, 10, 3400.Google Scholar
Wegdell, F., Hammerschmidt, K., & Fischer, J. (2019). Conserved alarm calls but rapid auditory learning in monkey responses to novel flying objects. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3, 1039–1042.Google Scholar
Wheeler, B. C., Fahy, M., & Tiddi, B. (2019). Experimental evidence for heterospecific alarm signal recognition via associative learning in wild capuchin monkeys. Animal Cognition, 22, 687–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A. (2000). Primate culture and social learning. Cognitive Science, 24, 477–508.Google Scholar
Wilson, V. A. D., Kade, C., Moeller, S., Treue, S., Kagan, I., & Fischer, J. (2020). Macaque gaze responses to the Primatar: A virtual macaque head for social cognition research. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1645.Google Scholar
Wittig, R. M., & Boesch, C. (2003). The choice of post-conflict interactions in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour, 140, 1527–1559.Google Scholar
Wittig, R. M., Crockford, C., Wikberg, E., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2007). Kin-mediated reconciliation substitutes for direct reconciliation in female baboons. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1109–1115.Google Scholar
Zuberbühler, K. (2006). Alarm calls. In Brown, K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (pp. 143–155). Elsevier.Google Scholar
Zuberbühler, K., Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1999). Conceptual semantics in a nonhuman primate. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 33–42.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×