Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:14:57.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Wisdom and Leadership

from Part IV - Wisdom in the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Judith Glück
Affiliation:
Universität Klagenfurt, Austria
Get access

Summary

This chapter outlines contemporary research related to excellent and inadequate leadership. This research reveals some practical problems arising in leadership research and identifies important psychological issues that contribute to bad or toxic leadership. The concept of wisdom, including practical wisdom, is elaborated as an effective and ethical foundation of leadership theory and practice. Central to practical wisdom are wise reasoning and the ability to do things wisely, including doing leadership wisely. There is a discussion of issues related to developing wisdom generally, and then specifically in leaders and potential leaders. The chapter fills a gap in understanding how to develop wisdom in people so that they act wisely. The chapter will give you some ideas on how to develop your wisdom potential. Finally, we will discuss the implications of our views on leadership and wisdom before concluding with reflections on why we keep appointing/ voting for bad leaders.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Psychology of Wisdom
An Introduction
, pp. 230 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvesson, M. and Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(4), 383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. (1984). Nicomachean Ethics, Apostle, H. G., trans. The Peripatetic Press.Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Wernsing, T., and Gardner, W. L. (2018). Revisiting the development and validation of the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire: analytical clarifications. Journal of Management, 44(2), 399411.Google Scholar
Barbuto, J. E. Jr. and Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group and Organization Management, 31(3), 300–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M. and Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership, 2nd ed. Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J., Westbrook, D., Fennell, M. et al. (2004). Behavioural experiments: historical and conceptual underpinnings. In Bennett-Levy, J., Butler, G., Fennell, M. et al., eds., Oxford Guide to Behavioural Experiments in Cognitive Therapy. Oxford University Press, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Berger, J., Osterloh, M., Rost, K., and Ehrmann, T. (2020). How to prevent leadership hubris? Comparing competitive selections, lotteries, and their combination. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), 101388.Google Scholar
Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Perry, J. L., and Jehn, K. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142(11), 1227–74.Google Scholar
Boddy, C. R. (2015). Psychopathic leadership: a case study of a corporate psychopath CEO. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 141–56.Google Scholar
Boddy, C. R. (2017). A Climate of Fear: Stone Cold Psychopaths at Work. Clive R. Boddy.Google Scholar
Boddy, C. R., Mile, S. D., Sanyal, C., and Hartog, M. (2015). Extreme managers, extreme workplaces: capitalism, organizations and corporate psychopaths. Organization, 22(4), 530–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, J. E. and Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–10.Google Scholar
Case, P., French, R., and Simpson, P. (2012). From theoria to theory: leadership without contemplation. Organization, 19(3), 345–61.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. and Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It’s all about me: narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–87.Google Scholar
Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Curnow, T. (2011). Sophia and phronesis: past, present, and future. Research in Human Development, 8(2), 95108.Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., and Tannenbaum, D. (2009). Motivated moral reasoning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, 307–38.Google Scholar
Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–87.Google Scholar
Einarsen, S., Schanke-Aasland, M., and Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: a definition and conceptual model. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahy, P. (2017). How to avoid hiring a narcissist: a toxic hire will hurt your team and your leadership credibility. The Journal of Medical Practice Management, 33(3), 146–9.Google Scholar
Glück, J. and Bluck, S. (2011). Laypeople’s conceptions of wisdom and its development: cognitive and integrative views. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(3), 321–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Glück, J. and Bluck, S. (2013). The MORE Life Experience Model: a theory of the development of personal wisdom. In Ferrari, M. and Weststrate, N. M., eds., The Scientific Study of Personal Wisdom: From Contemplative Traditions to Neuroscience. Springer, pp. 7598.Google Scholar
Glück, J., Bluck, S., and Weststrate, N. M. (2018). More on the MORE Life Experience Model: what we have learned (so far). The Journal of Value Inquiry, 53(3), 349–70.Google ScholarPubMed
González, E. (2002). Defining a post-conventional corporate moral responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1), 101-108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership. Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Guignon, C. B. (2004). On Being Authentic. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogue, M. and Lord, R. G. (2007). A multilevel, complexity theory approach to understanding gender bias in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 370–90.Google Scholar
Jeste, D. V. and Vahia, I. V. (2008). Comparison of the conceptualization of wisdom in ancient Indian literature with modern views: focus on the Bhagavad Gita. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 71(3), 197209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeste, D. V., Thomas, M. L., Liu, J. et al. (2021). Is spirituality a component of wisdom? Study of 1,786 adults using expanded San Diego Wisdom Scale (Jeste-Thomas Wisdom Index). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 132, 174–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, E. (2017). Developing leaders to perform in uncertainty: the mindfulness solution. Ph.D thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
King, E., Norbury, K., and Rooney, D. (in press). Coaching for leadership wisdom. Organizational Dynamics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landay, K., Harms, P. D., and Credé, M. (2019). Shall we serve the dark lords? A meta-analytic review of psychopathy and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 183–96.Google Scholar
Langer, E. J. (1989). Minding matters: the consequences of mindlessness–mindfulness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 137–73.Google Scholar
Langer, E. J., Blank, A., and Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: the role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(6), 635–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., and Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, B., Rooney, D., and Boal, K. (2009). Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 177–90.Google Scholar
Manz, C. C. and Sims, H. P., Jr. (1991). Superleadership: beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(4), 1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., and Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–88.Google Scholar
Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., and Hilbig, B. E. (2020). Measuring the dark core of personality. Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 182–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oc, B., Daniels, M. A., Diefendorff, J. M., Bashshur, M. R., and Greguras, G. J. (2020a). Humility breeds authenticity: how authentic leader humility shapes follower vulnerability and felt authenticity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 158, 112–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oc, B., Netchaeva, E., and Kouchaki, M. (2020b). It’s a man’s world! The role of political ideology in the early stages of leader recruitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 162, 2441.Google Scholar
Ouimet, G. (2010). Dynamics of narcissistic leadership in organizations: towards an integrated research model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(7), 713–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla, A., Hogan, R., and Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176–94.Google Scholar
Parris, D. L. and Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 377–93.Google Scholar
Pelletier, K. L. (2010). Leader toxicity: an empirical investigation of toxic behavior and rhetoric. Leadership, 6(4), 373–89.Google Scholar
Piętka, D. (2015). The concept of intuition and its role in Plato and Aristotle. Organon, 47, 2340.Google Scholar
Pretz, J. E., Brookings, J. B., Carlson, L. A. et al. (2014). Development and validation of a new measure of intuition: the types of intuition scale. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(5), 454–67.Google Scholar
Purser, R. E. and Loy, D. (2013). Beyond McMindfulness. Huffington Post, 1(7), 13.Google Scholar
Reed, L. L., Vidaver-Cohen, D., and Colwell, S. R. (2011). A new scale to measure executive servant leadership: development, analysis, and implications for research. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 415–34.Google Scholar
Rooney, D., McKenna, B., and Liesch, P. (2010). Wisdom and Management in the Knowledge Economy. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, D., Küpers, W., Pauleen, D., and Zhuravleva, E. (2021). A developmental model for educating wise leaders: the role of mindfulness and habitus in creating time for embodying wisdom. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(1), 181–94.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, S. A. and Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 617–33.Google Scholar
Rosette, A. S., Leonardelli, G. J., and Phillips, K. W. (2008). The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 758–77.Google Scholar
Ryömä, A. (2020). The interplay of heroic and post-heroic leadership: exploring tensions in leadership manifestations in the oscillations between onstage and offstage contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36(1), 101092.Google Scholar
Schouten, R., Silver, J., and Silver, J. (2012). Almost A Psychopath: Do I (Or Does Someone I Know) Have a Problem with Manipulation and Lack of Empathy? Hazelden.Google Scholar
Schyns, B. and Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J. C., and Santora, J. C. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 402–24.Google Scholar
Sheehy, B., Boddy, C. R., and Murphy, B. (2020). Corporate law and corporate psychopaths. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, September 10; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2020.1795000Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). What is wisdom and how can we develop it? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 164–74.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Wisdom, foolishness, and toxicity in leadership: how does one know which is which? In Mumford, M. and Higgs, C. A., eds., Leader Thinking Skills: Capacities for Contemporary Leadership. Routledge, pp. 362–81.Google Scholar
Thoroughgood, C. N., Padilla, A., Hunter, S. T., and Tate, B. W. (2012). The susceptible circle: a taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 897917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trowbridge, R. H. and Ferrari, M. (2011). Sophia and phronesis in psychology, philosophy, and traditional wisdom. Research in Human Development, 8(2), 8994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–31.Google Scholar
Valentine, S., Fleischman, G., and Godkin, L. (2018). Villains, victims, and verisimilitudes: an exploratory study of unethical corporate values, bullying experiences, psychopathy, and selling professionals’ ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 135–54.Google Scholar
Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: a review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., and Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89126.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(2), 163–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Webster, J. D. and Deng, X. C. (2015). Paths from trauma to intrapersonal strength: worldview, posttraumatic growth and wisdom. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 20(3), 253–66.Google Scholar
Westover, T. (2018). Educated. Windmill Books.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×