Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:10:47.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2020

Nichole M. Bauer
Nichole M. Bauer
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Qualifications Gap
Why Women Must Be Better than Men to Win Political Office
 , pp. 195 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaldering, Loes, and van der Pas, Daphne Joanna. 2017. “Political Leadership in the Media: Gender Bias in Leader Stereotypes during Campaign and Routine Times.” British Journal of Political Science forthcoming. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AAUW. 2016. Barriers and Bias: The Status of Women in Leadership. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.Google Scholar
Alexander, Deborah, and Anderson, Kristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3):527–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, David J., and Ditonto, Tessa M.. 2018. “Information and Its Presentation: Gender Cues in Low-Information vs. High-Information Experiments.” Political Analysis 26 (4):379–398.Google Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Berry, Christopher R.. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3):478–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Cory. L. 2004. “The Influence of Reporter Gender on Source Selection in Newspaper Stories.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81:139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2018. “Someone like Me: Descriptive Representation and Support for Supreme Court Nominees.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (1):127–142.Google Scholar
Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2019. “Voting for Women in Nonpartisan and Partisan Elections.” Electoral Studies 57:245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, Chardie L. 2008. “The Importance of Community Context for Young Women’s Occupational Aspirations.” Sex Roles 58 (3–4):208–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann. 1996. Why Movements Succeed or Fail: Opportunity, Culture, and the Struggle for Women’s Suffrage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, John A. 1989. “Conditional Automaticity: Varieties of Automatic Influence in Social Perception and Cognition.” In Unintended Thought, edited by Uleman, J. S. and Bargh, J. A., 3–51. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Bargh, John A. 1994. “The Four Horsemen of Automacity: Awareness, Intention, Efficiency, and Control in Social Cogniton.” In Handbook of Social Cognition, edited by Wyer, R. S. Jr. and Skrull, T. K., 1–40. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D. 2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Beaulieu, Emily. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes and Corruption: How Candidates Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud.” Politics & Gender 10:365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., Beaulieu, Emily, and Saxton, Gregory W.. 2017. “Restoring Trust in the Police: Why Female Officers Reduce Suspicions of Corruption.” Governance 31:1–19.Google Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., Beaulieu, Emily, and Saxton, Gregory W.. forthcoming. “Sex and Corruption: How Sexism Shapes Voters’ Responses to Scandal.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8:103–121.Google Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., Branton, Regina P., and Cassese, Erin C.. 2017. “A Re-examination of Women’s Electoral Success in Open Seat Elections: The Conditioning Effect of Electoral Competition.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38 (3):298–317.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2015a. “Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office: Gender Stereotype Activation and Support for Female Candidates.” Political Psychology 36 (6):691–708. doi: 10.1111/pops.12186.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2015b. “Who Stereotypes Female Candidates? Identifying Individual Differences in Feminine Stereotype Reliance.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (1):94–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2014.992794.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2017. “The Effects of Counter-Stereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations.” Political Psychology 38 (2):279–295. doi: 10.1111/pops.12351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2018. “Untangling the Relationship between Partisanship, Gender Stereotypes, and Support for Female Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 39 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2019. “The Effects of Partisan Trespassing Strategies across Candidate Sex.” Political Behavior 41(4): 897–915. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9475-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020a. “Running Local: Gender Stereotyping and Female Candidates in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 56(1): 96–123.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020b. “Shifting Standards: How Voters Evaluate the Qualifications of Female and Male Candidates.” Journal of Politics 82(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M., Harbridge, Laurel Yong, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2017. “Who Is Punished? Conditions Affecting Voter Evaluations of Legislators Who Do Not Compromise.” Political Behavior 39 (2):379–400. doi: 10.1007/s11109-016-9356-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Sandra, and Lansing, Marjorie. 1983. Women and Politics: The Visible Majority. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bederman, G. 1995. Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bejarano, Christina. 2013. The Latina Advantage: Gender, Race, and Political Success. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Rachel, and Freeder, Sean. 2020. “The More You Know: Voter Heuristics and the Information Search.” Political Behavior 42:603–623.Google Scholar
Berry, Marie, and Chenoweth, Erica. 2018. “Who Made the Women’s March?” In The Resistance: The Dawn of the Anti-Trump Opposition Movement, edited by Meyer, David S. and Tarrow, Sidney. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biernat, Monica, and Kobrynowicz, Diane. 1997. “Gender- and Race-Based Standards of Competence: Lower Minimum Standards but Higher Ability Standards for Devalued Groups.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 72 (3):554–557.Google Scholar
Biernat, Monica, and Manis, Melvin. 1994. “Shifting Standards and Stereotype Based Judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (1):5–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigler, Rebecca S., and Lieben, Lynn S.. 2006. “A Developmental Intergroup Theory of Social Stereotypes and Prejudice.” In Advances in Child Development and Behavior, edited by Vail, R. V., 39–89. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Biroli, Flavia. 2018. “Violence against Women and Reactions to Gender Equality in Politics.” Politics & Gender 14 (4):681–685.Google Scholar
Bittner, Amanda, and Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth. 2017. “Sex Isn’t Gender: Reforming Concepts and Measurements in the Study of Public Opinion.” Political Behavior 39 (4):1019–1041. doi: 10.1007/s11109-017-9391-y.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1765. Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blair, Irene V. 2002. “The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Review 6 (3):242–261.Google Scholar
Blair, Irene V., and Banaji, Mahzarin R.. 1996. “Automatic and Controlled Processes in Stereotype Priming.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (6):1142–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bligh, Michelle C., Shlehofer, Michele M., Casad, Bettina J., and Gaffney, Amber M.. 2012. “Competent Enough, but Would You Vote for Her? Gender Stereotypes and Media Influences on Perceptions of Women Politicians.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42 (3):560–597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00781.x.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R., Fleisher, Richard, and Talbert, Jeffrey C.. 1997. “Partisan Differences in Candidate Quality in Open Seat House Races, 1976–1994.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (2):281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, Chris W., and Kanthak, Kristin. 2018. “Stronger Together: Political Ambition and the Presentation of Women Running for Office.” Politics, Groups, and Identities forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bos, Angela L. 2011. “Out of Control: Delegates’ Information Sources and Perceptions of Female Candidates.” Political Communication 28 (1):87–109.Google Scholar
Bos, Angela L. 2015. “The Unintended Effects of Political Party Affirmative Action Politics on Female Candidate’s Nomination Chances.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (1):73–93.Google Scholar
Bourque, Susan C., and Grossholtz, Jean. 1974. “Politics as Unnatural Practice: Political Science Looks at Female Participation.” Politics & Society 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., De Boef, Suzanna, and Lin, Tse-min. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” The American Political Science Review 98 (3):515–528.Google Scholar
Boydstun, Amber E., and Van Aelst, Peter. 2018. “New Rules for an Old Game? How the 2016 US Election Caught the Press off Guard.” Mass Communication and Society 21 (6):671–696. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2018.1492727.Google Scholar
Bracic, Ana, Israel-Trummel, Mackenzie, and Shortle, Allyson. 2019. “Is Sexism for White People? Gender Stereotypes, Race, and the 2016 Presidential Election.” Political Behavior 41 (2):281–307. doi: doi.org/10.1007/s1110.Google Scholar
Branton, Regina, English, Ashley, Pettey, Samantha, and Barnes, Tiffany D.. 2018. “The Impact of Gender and Quality Opposition on the Relative Assessment of Candidate Competency.” Electoral Studies 54:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.002.Google Scholar
Brescoll, Victoria L., and LaFrance, M.. 2004. “The Correlates and Consequences of Newspaper Reports of Research on Sex Differences.” Psychological Science 15:515–220.Google Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2013. He Runs, She Runs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Elizabeth R., Diekman, Amanda B., and Schneider, Monica C.. 2011. “A Change Will Do Us Good: Threats Diminish Typical Preferences for Male Leaders.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37 (7):930–941.Google Scholar
Brown, Nadia. 2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, Lisa A., and Hellwege, Julia Marin. 2018. “Working Mothers Represent: How Children Affect the Legislative Agenda of Women in Congress.” American Politics Research 47 (3):447–470.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C., Ono, Yoshikuni, and Yamada, Masahiro. 2017. “Reassessing Public Support for a Female President.” Journal of Politics 79 (3):1–7.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2004. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, Sarah, Eberhardt, Lindsay, and Merolla, Jennifer L.. 2013. “What Is the Difference between a Hockey Mom and a Pit Bull? Presentations of Palin and Gender Stereotypes in the 2008 Presidential Election.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (3):687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T., Lewis, N. A., and Hunt, W. A.. 1958. “Context Effects with Judgmental Language That Is Absolute, Extensive, and Extra-Experimentally Anchored.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 55:220–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” Journal of Politics 68 (2):233–247.Google Scholar
Campbell, David, and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2019. “The Resistance as Role Model: Disillusionment and Protest among American Adolescents after 2016.” Political Behavior forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cargile, Ivy A. M. 2016. “Latina Issues: An Analysis of the Policy Issue Competencies of Latina Candidates.” In Distinct Identities: Minority Women in U.S. Politics, edited by Brown, Nadia E. and Gershon, Sarah A., 134–150. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cargile, Ivy A. M., and Pringle, Lisa. 2019. “Context Not Candidate Sex: A Case Study of Female Vote Choice for Mayor.” Urban Affairs Review forthcoming.Google Scholar
Carlin, Diana B., and Winfrey, Kelly L.. 2009. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage.” Communication Studies 60 (4):326–343. doi: 10.1080/10510970903109904.Google Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas, and Sadin, Meredith L.. 2014. “The ‘Mill Worker’s Son’ Heuristic: How Voters Perceive Politicians from Working-Class Families – And How They Really Behave in Office.” Journal of Politics 77 (1):285–298.Google Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas, and Lupu, Noam. 2015. “What Good Is a College Degree? Education and Leader Quality Reconsidered.” Journal of Politics 78 (1):35–50.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J., and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., Engstrom, Erik J., and Roberts, Jason M.. 2007. “Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in Congress.” American Political Science Review 101 (2):289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Erin C. 2019. “Intersectional Stereotyping in Political Decision Making.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Political Decision Making, edited by Redlawsk, David, Oxford University Press https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-773.Google Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2018. “Party and Gender Stereotypes in Campaign Attacks.” Political Behavior 40 (3):785–807. doi: 10.1007/s11109-017-9423-7.Google Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2019. “Playing the Woman Card: Ambivalent Sexism in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Race.” Political Psychology 40 (1):55–74.Google Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Barnes, Tiffany D.. 2019. “Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races.” Political Behavior 41 (4): 677–700.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Hope. 1973. A Minority of Members, Women in the U.S. Congress. New York: New York American Library.Google Scholar
Chambers, David Wade. 1983. “Stereotypic Images of the Scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test.” Science Education 67 (2):255–265.Google Scholar
Chang, Edward H., Milkman, Katherine L., Gromet, Dena M., Rebele, Robert W., Massey, Cade, Duckworth, Angela L., and Grant, Adam M.. 2019. “The Mixed Effects of Online Diversity Training.” PNAS forthcoming.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Shirley. 1970. Unbought and Unbossed. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Claassen, Ryan L., and Ryan, John Barry. 2016. “Social Desirability, Hidden Biases, and Support for Hillary Clinton.” PS: Political Science and Politics 49 (4):730–735.Google Scholar
Clayton, Amanda, O’Brien, Diana Z., and Jennifer Piscopo, M. 2019. “All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (1):113–129.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. M., and Hong, Y. Y.. 2008. “Beyond Nature and Nurture: The Influence of Lay Gender Theories on Self-Stereotyping.” Self and Identity 7:34–53.Google Scholar
Conroy, Meredith, 2015. Masculinity, Media, and the American Presidency. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, and Wilcox, Clyde. 1994. The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Corder, J. Kevin, and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2016. Counting Women’s Ballots Female Voters from Suffrage through the New Deal. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender 9:390–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2018. “Can’t Buy Them Love: How Party Culture among Donors Contributes to the Party Gap in Women’s Representation.” Journal of Politics 80 (4):1211–1224. doi: 10.1086/698848.Google Scholar
Darr, Joshua P. 2016. “Presence to Press: How Campaigns Earn Local Media.” Political Communication 33 (3):503–522. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2015.1107158.Google Scholar
Deason, Grace, Greenlee, Jill S., and Langer, Carrie A.. 2015. “Mothers on the Campaign Trail: Implications of Politicized Motherhood on Women in Politics.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (1):133–148.Google Scholar
Deckman, Melissa. 2016. Tea Party Women: Mama Grizzlies, Grassroots Leaders, and the Changing Face of the American Right. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Devine, Patricia G. 1989. “Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their Automatic and Controlled Components.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1):5–18.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Bryce J., Hayes, Matthew, and O’Brien, Diana Z.. 2019. “Pitch Perfect: Vocal Pitch and the Emotional Intensity of Congressional Speech on Women.” American Political Science Review 13 (4): 941–962.Google Scholar
Ditonto, Tessa M. 2017. “A High Bar or a Double Standard? Gender, Competence, and Information in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior 39 (2): 301–325. doi: 10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5.Google Scholar
Ditonto, Tessa M., and Andersen, David J.. 2018. “Two’s a Crowd: Women Candidates in Concurrent Elections.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 39 (3):257–284.Google Scholar
Ditonto, Tessa M., Hamilton, Allison J., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Information Search, and Voting Behavior in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior 36 (2):335–358.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly. 2015. Navigating Gendered Terrain: Stereotypes and Strategy in Political Campaigns. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly, Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Carroll, Susan J.. 2018. A Seat at the Table. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doan, Alesha E., and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2010. “The Role of Intersectional Stereotypes on Evaluations of Gay and Lesbian Political Candidates.” Politics & Gender 6 (1): 63–91.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Kifer, Martin J., and Parkin, Michael. 2009. “Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 103 (3):343–366. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409990037.Google Scholar
Ducat, S. 2004. The Wimp Factor: Gender Gaps, Holy Wars, and the Politics of Anxious Masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 2007. “Masculinity on the Campaign Trail.” In Rethinking Madam President: Are We Ready for a Woman in the White House?, edited by Cox Han, Lori and Heldman, Caroline. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, p. 87–112.Google Scholar
Dunaway, Johanna, Lawrence, Regina G., Rose, Melody, and Weber, Christopher R.. 2013. “Traits versus Issues: How Female Candidates Shape Coverage of Senate and Gubernatorial Races.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (3):715–726. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913491464.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Carli, Linda L.. 2003. “The Female Leadership Advantage: An Evaluation of the Evidence.” The Leadership Quarterly 14:807–834.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Carli, Linda L.. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Karau, Steve J.. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109 (3):573–594. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573.Google Scholar
Ekstrand, Laurie E., and Eckert, William A.. 1981. “The Impact of Candidate’s Sex on Voter Choice.” The Western Political Quarterly 34 (1):78–87.Google Scholar
Evans, Sara. 1979. Personal Politics: The Roots of Women’s Liberation in the Civil Rights Movement and the New Left. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Neuberg, Steven L.. 1990. “A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by Zanna, M. P., 1–69. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Ellen. 2016. “The Unfavored Daughter: When Margaret Chase Smith Ran in the New Hampshire Primary.” The New Yorker, February 6.Google Scholar
Folke, Olle, and Rickne, Johanna. 2016. “The Glass Ceiling in Politics: Formalization and Empirical Tests.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (5):567–599.Google Scholar
Foschi, Martha. 1992. “Gender and Double Standards for Competence.” In Gender, Interaction, and Inequality, edited by Ridgeway, Cecilia L.. New York: Springer-Verlag, p. 181–207.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2014a. “Reconciling Family Roles with Political Ambition: The New Normal for Women in Twenty-First Century U.S. Politics.” Journal of Politics 76 (2):398–414.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2014b. “Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition.” American Political Science Review 108 (3):499–519.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. 1975. The Politics of Women’s Liberation: A Case Study of an Emerging Social Movement and Its Relation to the Policy Process. New York: D. McKay.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2009. “The Role of Gender Stereotypes in U.S. Senate Campaigns.” Politics & Gender 5:301–329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09990158.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2014. “How the Gender of U.S. Senators Influences People’s Understanding of Politics.” The Journal of Politics 76 (4):1017–1031.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2015. The Changing Face of Representation: The Gender of U.S. Senators and Constituent Communications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 1999. “What Does Feminization of Poverty Mean? It Isn’t Just Lack of Income.” Feminist Economics 5 (2):99–103.Google Scholar
Fulton, Sarah A. 2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2):303–314.Google Scholar
Fulton, Sarah A. 2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-dynamics and Micro-mechanisms.” Political Behavior 36:605–630.Google Scholar
Fulton, Sarah A., Maestas, Cherie D., Maisel, L. Sandy, and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2):235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, Carolyn L. 1999. “Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluation.” Journal of Politics 61 (3):700–720.Google Scholar
Gehlen, Frieda L. 1977a. “Women Members of Congress: A Distinctive Role.” In A Portrait of Marginality: The Political Behavior of the American Woman, edited by Githens, Marianne and Prestage, Jewel L.. New York: McKay, p. 304–319.Google Scholar
Gehlen, Frieda L. 1977b. “Legislative Role Performance of Female Legislators.” Sex Roles 3 (1):1–19.Google Scholar
Gershon, Sarah Allen. 2008. “Communicating Female and Minority Interests Online: A Study of Web Site Issue Discussion among Female, Latino, and African American Members of Congress.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 13 (2):120–140.Google Scholar
Gershon, Sarah Allen. 2012a. “Press Secretaries, Journalists, and Editors: Shaping Local Congressional News Coverage.” Political Communication 29 (2):160–183.Google Scholar
Gershon, Sarah Allen. 2012b. “When Race, Gender, and the Media Intersect: Campaign News Coverage of Minority Congresswomen.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 33 (2):105–125.Google Scholar
Gershon, Sarah Allen. 2013. “Media Coverage of Minority Congresswomen and Voter Evaluations: Evidence from an Online Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (3):702–714.Google Scholar
Gertzog, Irwin. 1984. Congressional Women: Their Recruitment, Treatment, and Behavior. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 1988. “Gender and Support for Reagan: A Comprehensive Model of Presidential Approval.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (1):19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Peter, Lameiras, Maria, Fiske, Susan T., Eckes, Thomas, Masser, Barbara, Volpato, Chiara, Wells, Robin, et al. 2004. “Bad but Bold: Ambivalent Attitudes toward Men Predict Gender Inequity in 16 Nations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86:713–728.Google Scholar
Golebiowska, Ewa A. 2003. “When to Tell?: Disclosure of Concealable Group Membership, Stereotypes, and Political Evaluation.” Political Behavior 25 (4):313–337.Google Scholar
Greenlee, Jill S. 2014. The Political Consequences of Motherhood. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenlee, Jill S., Nteta, Tatishe M., Rhodes, Jesse H., and Sharrow, Elizabeth A.. 2018. “Helping to Break the Glass Ceiling? Fathers, First Daughters, and Presidential Vote Choice in 2016.” Political Behavior forthcoming.Google Scholar
Groeling, Tim. 2010. When Politicians Attack: Party Cohesion in the Media. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guttmann, A., and Thompson, D.. 2012. The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., Miller, Patrick, Flores, Andrew, Lewis, Daniel C., Tadlock, Barry, and Taylor, Jami. 2017. “Bringing ‘T’ to the Table: Understanding Individual Support of Transgender Candidates for Public Office.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (3):399–417.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4):529–550.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4):908–923. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00163.xGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2010. “Agenda Convergence and the Paradox of Competitiveness in Political Campaigns.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (3):594–611.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7 (2):133–165. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X11000055.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny, and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2016. Women on the Run: Gender, Media, and Political Campaigns in a Polarized Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heilman, Madeline E., and Okimoto, Tyler G.. 2007. “Why Are Women Penalized for Success at Male Tasks?: The Implied Communality Deficit.” Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (1):81–92.Google Scholar
Heilman, Madeline E., Block, Caryn J., and Martell, Richard F.. 1995. “Sex Stereotypes: Do They Influence Perceptions of Managers?” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10 (4):237–252.Google Scholar
Heldman, Caroline J., Carroll, Susan J., and Olson, Stephanie. 2005. “‘She Brought Only a Skirt’: Print Media Coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s Bid for the Republican Presidential Nomination.” Political Communication 22:315–335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006564.Google Scholar
Hennings, Valerie M., and Urbatsch, R.. 2015. “There Can Be Only One (Woman on the Ticket): Gender in Candidate Nominations.” Political Behavior 37 (3):749–766.Google Scholar
Herrick, Rebekah. 2016. “Gender Themes in State Legislative Candidates’ Websites.” The Social Science Journal 53:282–290.Google Scholar
Heyman, Gail D., and Giles, Jessica W.. 2006. “Gender and Psychological Essentialism.” Enfrance 58 (3):293–310.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R. 2013. “Sex and the City: Female Leaders and Spending on Social Welfare Programs in U.S. Municipalities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 36 (4):701–715.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., and Schneider, Monica C.. 2018. “Gender, Race, and Political Ambition: How Intersectionality and Frames Influence Interest in Political Office.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 6 (2):264–280.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Merolla, Jennifer, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2011. “Sex, Stereotypes, and Security: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Crises on Assessments of Gender and Leadership.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32 (3):173–192.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Merolla, Jennifer L., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2016. “Terrorist Threat, Male Stereotypes, and Candidate Evaluations.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (1):134–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915624018.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Merolla, Jennifer, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2017. “Can Experience Overcome Stereotypes in Times of Terror Threat?” Research and Politics January–March 4:1–7.Google Scholar
Homola, Jonathan. 2019. “Are Parties Equally Responsive to Women and Men?” British Journal of Political Science 49 (3):957–975.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1):119–147.Google Scholar
Jane, E. A. 2014a. “‘Back to the kitchen, cunt’: Speaking the Unspeakable about Online Misogyny.” Continuum 28:558–570.Google Scholar
Jane, E. A. 2014b. “Your a ugly, whorish slut.” Feminist Media Studies 14:531–546.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Farah, Barbara G.. 1981. “Social Roles and Political Resources: An Over-Time Study of Men and Women in Party Elites.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (3):462–482.Google Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer, and Barabas, Jason. 2017. “Revisiting the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Political Behavior 39 (4):817–838. doi: 10.1007/s11109-016-9380-6.Google Scholar
Jones, Phillip Edward, and Brewer, Paul R.. 2019. “Gender Identity as a Political Cue: Voter Responses to Transgender Candidates.” Journal of Politics 81 (2):697–701.Google Scholar
Jones, Phillip Edward, Brewer, Paul R., Young, Dannagal, Lambe, Jennifer L., and Hoffman, Lindsay H.. 2018. “Explaining Public Opinion toward Transgender People, Rights, and Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (2):252–278.Google Scholar
Junn, Jane. 2017. “The Trump Majority: White Womanhood and the Making of Female Voters in the U.S.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (2):343–352.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1992. “Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of US Senate Candidates.” The Journal of Politics 54 (2):497–517.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1994. “Does Gender Make a Difference? An Experimental Examination of Sex Stereotypes and Press Patterns in Statewide Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1):162–195. doi: DOI: 10.2307/2111340.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Goldenberg, Edie N.. 1991. “Women Candidates in the News: An Examination of Gender Differences in U.S. Senate Campaign Coverage.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 55 (2):180–199.Google Scholar
Kanthak, Kristin, and Woon, Jonathon. 2015. “Women Don’t Run: Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3):595–612.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher, Monson, Quin, and Preece, Jessica. 2017. “How to Elect More Women: Gender and Candidate Success in a Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (4):927–943.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Karen M. 2002. “Culture Wars, Secular Realignment, and the Gender Gap in Party Identification.” Political Behavior 24 (3):283–307.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. 1980. Women of the Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jeong. 2019. “Direct Democracy and Women’s Political Engagement.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (3): 594–610.Google Scholar
Klar, Samara, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klar, Samara, Madonia, Heather, and Schneider, Monica C.. 2014. “The Influence of Threatening Parental Primes on Mothers’ versus Fathers’ Policy Preferences.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 2 (4):607–623.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?” The Journal of Politics 62 (2):414–429.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens’ Impressions of House Candidates’ Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2):453–462.Google Scholar
Koenig, Anne M., Eagly, Alice H., Mitchell, Abigail A., and Ristikari, Tiina. 2011. “Are Leader Stereotypes Masculine? A Meta-Analysis of Three Research Paradigms.” Psychological Bulletin 137 (4):616–642.Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna, and Ryan, John Barry. 2017. “Choice vs. Action: Candidate Ambiguity and Voter Decision Making 501.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 12 (4):479–505.Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna, and Bauer, Nichole M.. 2014. “The Relationship between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context.” Political Behavior 36 (1):167–188.Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna, Milita, Kerri, Ryan, John Barry, and Connors, Elizabeth C.. 2019. “How Gender Affects the Efficacy of Discussion as an Information Shortcut.” Political Science Research Methods forthcoming.Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna, Piston, Spencer, and Bauer, Nichole M.. 2016. “Saving Face: Identifying Voter Responses to Black and Female Candidates.” Political Psychology 37 (2):253–273. doi: 10.1111/pops.12261.Google Scholar
Kunda, Ziva, Sinclair, Lisa, and Griffin, Dale. 1997. “Equal Ratings but Separate Meanings: Stereotypes and the Construal of Traits.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (4):720–734.Google Scholar
Kuperberg, Rebecca. 2018. “Intersectional Violence against Women in Politics.” Politics & Gender 14 (4):685–690.Google Scholar
Ladam, Christina, Harden, Jeffrey J., and Windett, Jason H.. 2018. “Prominent Role Models: High-Profile Female Politicians and the Emergence of Women as Candidates for Public Office.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (2):369–381.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert. 1965. Political Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2012. Becoming a Candidate: Political Ambition and the Decision to Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women’s Underrepresentation? Reevaluating Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 70 (1):67–82.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Regina G., and Rose, Melody. 2010. Hillary Clinton's Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Regina G., and Rose, Melody. 2011. “Bringing out the Hook: Exit Talk in Media Coverage of Hillary Clinton and Past Presidential Campaigns.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4):870–883.Google Scholar
Lay, J. Celeste. 2015. “The Salience of Schools and Safety: Explaining Mayoral Voting among Women in Cities.” In Minority Voting in the United States, edited by Krieder, Kyle L. and Baldino, Thomas J., 168–189. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABC-Clio.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Jeffrey, and Steigerwalt, Amy. 2018. Gendered Vulnerability: How Women Work Harder to Stay in Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Levanon, Asaf, England, Paula, and Allison, Paul. 2009. “Occupational Feminization and Pay: Assessing Causal Dynamics using 1950–2000 U.S. Census Data.” Social Forces 88 (2):865–891.Google Scholar
Lizotte, Mary-Kate, and Sideman, Andrew H.. 2009. “Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Politics & Gender:127–151.Google Scholar
Lizotte, Mary-Kate, and Meggers-Wright, Heather J.. 2019. “Negative Effects of Calling Attention to Female Political Candidates’ Attractiveness.” Journal of Political Marketing 18 (3): 240–266.Google Scholar
Lowande, Kenneth, Ritchie, Melinda, and Lauterbach, Erinn. 2019. “Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (3): 644–659.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine. 1979. Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maestas, Cherie D., and Rugeley, Cynthia R.. 2008. “Assessing the ‘Experience Bonus’ through Examining Strategic Entry, Candidate Quality, and Campaign Receipts in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3):520–535.Google Scholar
Maestas, Cherie D., Fulton, Sarah A., Maisel, L. Sandy, and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review 199 (2):195–208.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Anna Mitchell. 2018. Women Take Their Place in State Legislatures: The Creation of Women’s Caucuses. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Manne, Kate A. 2018. Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1985. “Myth and Reality: The ERA and the Gender Gap in the 1980 Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (2):164–178.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” The Journal of Politics 61 (3):628–657.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCammon, Holly J., and Campbell, Karen E.. 2001. “Winning the Vote in the West: The Political Successes of the Women’s Suffrage Movements.” American Sociological Review 66 (1):49–70.Google Scholar
McConnaughy, Corrine 2013. The Woman Suffrage Movement in America: A Reassessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1):270–283.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (4):895–918.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 2016. Masculinity, Femininity, and American Political Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milita, Kerri, Simas, Elizabeth N., Ryan, John Barry, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2017. “The Effects of Ambiguous Rhetoric in Congressional Elections.” Electoral Studies 46: 48–63. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.01.004.Google Scholar
Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., and Chugh, D.. 2015. “What Happens Before? A Field Experiment Exploring How Pay and Representation Differentially Shape Bias on the Pathway into Organizations.” Journal of Applied Psychology 100 (6):1678–1712.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Wattenberg, Martin P., and Malanchuk, Oksana. 1986. “Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review 80 (2):521–540.Google Scholar
Miller, Melissa K., and Peake, Jeffrey S.. 2013. “Press Effects, Public Opinion, and Gender: Coverage of Sarah Palin’s Vice Presidential Campaign.” International Journal of Press/Politics 18:482–507.Google Scholar
Milyo, Jeffrey, and Schlosberg, Samantha. 2000. “Gender Bias and Selection Bias in House Elections.” Public Choice 105 (1–2):41–59.Google Scholar
Mo, Hyunjung Cecilia. 2015. “The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters.” Political Behavior 37 (2):357–395.Google Scholar
Moss-Rascusin, Corinne A., Phelan, Julie E., and Rudman, Laurie A.. 2010. “When Men Break the Gender Rules: Status Incongruity and Backlash against Modest Men.” Psychology of Men and Masculinity 11 (2):140–151.Google Scholar
Nugent, Mary K. 2019. “When Does He Speak for She? Men Representing Women in Parliaments.” PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Oliver, Sarah, and Conroy, Meredith. 2017. “Tough Enough for the Job? How Masculinity Predicts Recruitment of City Council Members.” American Politics Research 46 (6):1094–1122.Google Scholar
Ondercin, Heather L. 2016. “To Run or Not to Run: How the Likelihood of Winning Influences the Decisions of Female Candidates.” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Ondercin, Heather L. 2017. “Who Is Responsible for the Gender Gap? The Dynamics of Men’s and Women’s Democratic Macropartisanship, 1950–2012.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (4):749–761.Google Scholar
Ondercin, Heather L., and Jones-White, Daniel. 2011. “Gender Jeopardy: What Is the Impact of Gender Differences in Political Knowledge on Political Participation?” Social Science Quarterly 92 (3):675–694.Google Scholar
Ono, Yoshikuni, and Burden, Barry C.. 2019. “The Contingent Effects of Candidate Sex on Voter Choice.” Political Behavior 41 (3):583–607.Google Scholar
Osborn, Tracy. 2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender, and Representation in the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis M.. 2001. “The Political Glass Ceiling: Gender, Strategy, and Incumbency in U.S. House Elections, 1978–1998.” Women & Politics 23 (1–2):59–78.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis M.. 2005. “When Women Run against Women: The Hidden Influence of Female Incumbents in Elections to the US House of Representatives.” Politics & Gender 1:35.Google Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn, and McGhee, Eric. 2013. “What It Takes to Win: Questioning ‘Gender Neutral’ Outcomes in U.S. House Elections.” Politics & Gender 9:439–462.Google Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn, and Dancey, Logan. 2011. “Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women’s Interests in a Partisan Era.” Politics & Gender 7:493–519.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3):825–850. doi: 10.2307/2111797.Google Scholar
Phelan, Julie E., Moss-Rascusin, Corinne A., and Rudman, Laurie A.. 2008. “Competent yet out in the Cold: Shifting Criteria for Hiring Reflect Backlash toward Agentic Women.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 32:406–413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00454.x.Google Scholar
Piston, Spencer, Krupnikov, Yanna, Ryan, John Barry, and Milita, Kerri. 2018. “Clear as Black and White: The Effects of Ambiguous Rhetoric Depend on Candidate Race.” Journal of Politics 82 (2):662–674.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric, and Zipp, John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics and Voting for Women Candidates.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1):30–57.Google Scholar
Postman, L., and Miller, G. A.. 1945. “Anchoring of Temporal Judgments.” American Journal of Psychology 58:43–53.Google Scholar
Prentice, Deborah A., and Carranza, Erica. 2002. “What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn’t Be, Are Allowed to Be, and Don’t Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 26 (4):269–291. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066.Google Scholar
Quadlan, Natasha. 2018. “The Mark of a Woman’s Record: Gender and Academic Performance in Hiring.” American Sociological Review 83 (2):331–360.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2):472–496.Google Scholar
Rheault, Ludovic, Rayment, Erica, and Musulan, Andreea. 2019. “Politicians in the Line of Fire: Incivility and the Treatment of Women on Social Media.” Research & Politics:1–7.Google Scholar
Ridout, Travis N., Fowler, Erika Franklin, and Searles, Kathleen. 2012. “Exploring the Validity of Electronic Newspaper Databases.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15 (6):451–466. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2011.638221.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. O., Ho, A. K., Rhodes, M., and Gelman, S. A.. 2017. “Making Boundaries Great Again: Essentialism and Support for Boundary Enhancing Initiatives.” Personality and Psychological Bulletin 43:1643–1658.Google Scholar
Rudman, Laurie A. 1998. “Self-Promotion as a Risk Factor for Women: The Costs and Benefits of Counter-Stereotypic Impression Management.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74:629–645.Google Scholar
Sadker, David, and Zittleman, Karen R.. 2009. Still Failing at Fairness: How Gender Bias Cheats Girls and Boys in School. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Sadker, Myra, and Sadker, David. 1986. “Sexism in the Classroom: From Grade School to Graduate School.” The Phi Delta Kappan 67 (7):512–515.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002a. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):20–34.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002b. “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures.” The Journal of Politics 64 (3):791–809.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Dolan, Kathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3):485–494.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay L., Burns, Nancy, Verba, Sidney, and Donahue, Jesse. 1995. “Gender and Citizen Activity: Is There a Different Voice?” American Journal of Political Science 39:267–293.Google Scholar
Schneider, Monica C. 2014a. “The Effects of Gender-Bending on Candidate Evaluations.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy 35:55–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2014.863697.Google Scholar
Schneider, Monica C. 2014b. “Gender-Based Strategies on Candidate Websites.” Journal of Political Marketing 13 (4):264–290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.958373.Google Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology 35 (2):245–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12040.Google Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2016. “The Intersection of Party and Gender Stereotypes in Evaluating Political Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 37 (3):274–294.Google Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., Holman, Mirya R., Diekman, Amanda B., and McAndrew, Thomas. 2016. “Power, Conflict, and Community: How Gendered Views of Political Power Influence Women’s Political Ambition.” Political Psychology 37 (4):515–531. doi: 10.1111/pops.12268.Google Scholar
Searles, Kathleen, and Banda, Kevin K.. 2019. “But Her Emails! How Journalistic Preferences Shaped Election Coverage in 2016.” Journalism 20 (8): 1052–1069.Google Scholar
Sellers, Patrick J. 1998. “Strategy and Background in Congressional Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 92 (1):159–171.Google Scholar
Seltzer, Richard, Newman, Jody, and Leighton, Melissa. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Silva, Andrea, and Skulley, Carrie. 2019. “Always Running: Candidate Emergence among Women of Color over Time.” Political Research Quarterly 72 (2):342–359.Google Scholar
Simien, Evelyn M. 2005. “Race, Gender, and Linked Fate.” Journal of Black Studies 35 (5):529–550.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Smith, Jessi, and Huntoon, Meghan. 2014. “Women’s Bragging Rights: Overcoming Modesty Norms to Facilitate Women’s Self-Promotion.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 38 (4):447–459.Google Scholar
Solowiej, Lisa, and Brunell, Thomas L.. 2003. “The Entrance of Women to the U.S. Congress: The Widow Effect.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (3):283–292.Google Scholar
Stoddard, Olga, and Preece, Jessica. 2015. “Why Women Don’t Run: Experimental Evidence on Gender Differences in Competition Aversion.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 117: 296–308.Google Scholar
Stone, Walter J., Fulton, Sarah A., Maestas, Cherie D., and Maisel, L. Sandy. 2006. “Incumbency Reconsidered: Prospects, Strategic Retirement, and Incumbent Quality in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 72 (1):178–190.Google Scholar
Stone, Walter J., Maisel, L. Sandy, and Maestas, Cherie D.. 2004. “Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (3):479–495.Google Scholar
Streb, Matthew J., Burrell, Barbara, Frederick, Brian, and Genovese, Michael A.. 2008. “Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (1):76–89.Google Scholar
Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, Howard, Philip N., and Schneider, Steven M.. 2003. “The New Political Campaign Position: A Survey of Web Site Producers and Managers.” International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Sweet-Cushman, Jennie. 2016. “Gender, Risk Assessment, and Political Ambition.” Politics and the Life Sciences 36 (2):1–17. doi: 10.1017/pls.2016.13.Google Scholar
Sweet-Cushman, Jennie. 2018. “Where Does the Pipeline Get Leaky? The Progressive Ambition of School Board Members and Personal and Political Network Recruitment.” Politics, Groups, and Identities forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sweet-Cushman, Jennie. 2019. “See It; Be It? The Use of Role Models in Campaign Trainings for Women.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7 (4): 853–863.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Rothbart M. 1992. “Category Labels and Social Reality: Do We View Social Categories as Natural Kinds?” In Language, Interaction, and Social Cognition, edited by Semin, G. R. and Friedler, K., 11–36. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Teele, Dawn Langan. 2018. “How the West Was Won: Competition, Mobilization, and Women’s Enfranchisement in the United States.” Journal of Politics 80 (2):442–461.Google Scholar
Teele, Dawn Langan. 2019. Forging the Franchise: The Political Origins of the Women’s Vote. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle M. 2015. “Why So Few (Republican) Women? Explaining the Partisan Imbalance in the US Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 50 (2):295–323.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle M. 2020. “Ideology and Gender in U.S. House Elections.” Political Behavior 42: 415–442.Google Scholar
Tolley, Erin. 2016. Framed: Media and the Coverage of Race in Canadian Politics. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Turcotte, Jason, and Paul, Newly. 2015. “A Case of More Is Less: The Role of Gender in U.S. Presidential Debates.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (4): 773–784. doi: 10.1177/1065912915605581:1-15.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Wayne, Carly, and Oceno, Marzia. 2018. “Mobilizing Sexism: The Interaction of Emotion and Gender Attitudes in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (Special Issue):213–235.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vinkenburg, Claartje, van Engen, Marloes L., Eagly, Alice H., and Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary C.. 2011. “An Exploration of Stereotypical Beliefs about Leadership Styles: Is Transformational Leadership a Route to Women’s Promotion?” The Leadership Quarterly 22 (1):10–21.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan E., and Wittmer, Dana E.. 2013. “When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers than Men?” American Journal of Political Science 57:326–341.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan E., and Wittmer, Dana E.. 2018. “Women’s Issues and Their Fates in the U.S. Congress.” Political Science Research Methods 6 (4):679–696. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2016.32.Google Scholar
Vraga, Emily K. 2017. “Which Candidates Can Be Mavericks? The Effects of Issue Disagreement and Gender on Candidate Evaluations.” Politics & Policy 45 (1):4–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12192.Google Scholar
Ward, Orlanda. 2016. “Seeing Double: Race, Gender, and Coverage of Minority Women’s Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Politics & Gender 12:317–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000222.Google Scholar
Ward, Orlanda. 2017. “Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns: Representations of Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic Female Candidates at the U.K. 2010 General Election.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 22 (1):43–66.Google Scholar
Williams, Leonard. 1998. “Political Advertising in the Year of the Woman: Did X Mark the Spot?” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, edited by Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Thomas, Sue, and Wilcox, Clyde, 197–215. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Wilton, Leigh S., Bell, Ariana N., Carpinella, Colleen M., Young, Danielle M., Meyers, Cahel, and Clapham, Rebekah. 2018. “Lay Theories of Gender Influence Support for Women and Transgender People’s Legal Rights.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 10 (7): 883–894.Google Scholar
Winter, Nicholas J. G. 2010. “Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties.” Political Behavior 32 (4):587–618. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z.Google Scholar
Witt, Linda, Paget, Karen M., and Matthews, Glenna. 1994. Running as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2015. “Candidate Gender and the Political Engagement of Women and Men.” American Politics Research 45 (3):872–896.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2019. “Descriptive Representation and the Political Engagement of Women.” Politics & Gender forthcoming.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2002. “Explaining Women’s Rights Realignment: Convention Delegates, 1972–1992.” Political Behavior 24 (3):237–282.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina, and Campbell, David E.. 2017. “Role Models Revisited: Youth, Novelty, and the Impact of Female Candidates.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (3):418–434. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1268179.Google Scholar
Wood, Wendy, and Eagly, Alice H.. 2012. “Biosocial Construction of Sex Differences and Similarities in Behavior.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by Olson, James M. and Zanna, Mark P., 55–123. Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zeldes, Geri Alumit, Zico, Frederick, and Diddi, Arvind. 2007. “Race and Gender: An Analysis of the Sources and Reporters in Local Television Coverage of the 2002 Michigan Gubernatorial Campaign.” Mass Communication and Society 10 (3):345–363.Google Scholar
Zipp, John F., and Plutzer, Eric. 1985. “Gender Differences in Voting for Female Candidates: Evidence from the 1982 Election.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (2):179–197.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Nichole M. Bauer, Louisiana State University
  • Book: The Qualifications Gap
  • Online publication: 17 July 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864503.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Nichole M. Bauer, Louisiana State University
  • Book: The Qualifications Gap
  • Online publication: 17 July 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864503.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Nichole M. Bauer, Louisiana State University
  • Book: The Qualifications Gap
  • Online publication: 17 July 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864503.010
Available formats
×