Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Part one Preview
- Part two Geometrical optics
- Part three Paraxial optics
- Part four Waves in homogeneous media
- 13 Waves
- 14 Wave propagation I: exact results
- 15 Wave propagation II: approximations
- 16 The stationary phase approximation
- Part five Wave propagation through lenses
- Part six Aberrations
- Part seven Applications
- Appendix 1 Fourier transforms
- Appendix 2 Third order calculations
- Appendix 3 Ray tracing
- Appendix 4 Eikonals and the propagation kernels
- Appendix 5 Paraxial eikonals
- Appendix 6 Hints and problem solutions
- Bibliography
- Index
16 - The stationary phase approximation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Part one Preview
- Part two Geometrical optics
- Part three Paraxial optics
- Part four Waves in homogeneous media
- 13 Waves
- 14 Wave propagation I: exact results
- 15 Wave propagation II: approximations
- 16 The stationary phase approximation
- Part five Wave propagation through lenses
- Part six Aberrations
- Part seven Applications
- Appendix 1 Fourier transforms
- Appendix 2 Third order calculations
- Appendix 3 Ray tracing
- Appendix 4 Eikonals and the propagation kernels
- Appendix 5 Paraxial eikonals
- Appendix 6 Hints and problem solutions
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Introduction
In this chapter we begin to forge a connection between the ray theory and the wave theory of light, two topics that so far have been treated as entirely separate and disconnected. Fresnel showed in the early nineteenth century how the idea of straight line propagation can be reconciled with the wave theory by using what are now called Fresnel zones. His reasoning went as follows. A source point S radiates a spherical wavefront towards a circular aperture, as shown in fig. 16.1. To find the amplitude of the light wave at a point P beyond the aperture, each point in the part of the wavefront not stopped by the screen may be considered as a secondary source. The amplitude at P is the sum of the amplitudes contributed by each of these secondary sources. In this summation the relative phase of the contributions plays a crucial role.
To get a handle on the summation, Fresnel divided the wavefront into annular zones. These zones are bounded by circles, chosen such that successive distances SQ1P, SQ2P, SQ3P… differ by half a wavelength. It is not difficult to show that the areas of the zones so constructed are very nearly equal. So the waves arriving at P coming from two adjacent zones have the same amplitude, but a phase difference of 180° on account of the way in which the zones were constructed. The contributions from adjacent zones therefore cancel each other.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Ray and Wave Theory of Lenses , pp. 154 - 166Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995