Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Facts and forms
- Part II Motives
- Part III Values and reasons
- 11 The values of reciprocity
- 12 Reciprocal corrections of market failures
- 13 Reciprocity in trust, and intrinsic values
- 14 Normative uses of reciprocity
- 15 The logic of good social relations
- 16 How and why? Understanding and explaining reciprocity
- Part IV The economics of reciprocity
- Bibliography
- Index
15 - The logic of good social relations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Facts and forms
- Part II Motives
- Part III Values and reasons
- 11 The values of reciprocity
- 12 Reciprocal corrections of market failures
- 13 Reciprocity in trust, and intrinsic values
- 14 Normative uses of reciprocity
- 15 The logic of good social relations
- 16 How and why? Understanding and explaining reciprocity
- Part IV The economics of reciprocity
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Introduction
The nature of good social relations
“Hell is the others,” a character of Jean-Paul Sartre says. Paradise may be the others too. The quality of social relations is an essential part of the quality of a society, a basic factor of the happiness, blooming or misery of its members, a widespread cause of the success or failure of its workings, and, indeed, a main consequence of the quality and virtue of the people themselves. The quality of social relations differs widely from one society to the other, and among various segments of a society – a fact that begs for explanation. This quality may also be improved as a result of social organization, or progress in social consciousness or education, and these possibilities of improvement should be understood.
However, the explanation of the quality of social relations raises major puzzles. People often complain about the poor quality or deterioration of social relations, and yet they are their own doing. They would often all benefit from better relations, and yet they fail to improve them. Can the required relations be obtained by exchanges and markets, or are they impaired by such selfish interactions, or, again, does the working of exchanges and markets require some of these good relations in the form of honesty? Do other-regarding conducts require out-and-out altruism, which could explain some insufficiencies, or are some more moderate and balanced social conducts sufficient? For instance, varieties of reciprocities may be relevant, or needed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- ReciprocityAn Economics of Social Relations, pp. 202 - 223Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008