Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:50:49.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Prevalence of Traditional Nonprofit Sector Theories in Research

from Part I - Overviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2024

By
Megan LePere-Schloop  and
Rebecca Nesbit
Edited by
Eva Witesman  and
Curtis Child
Eva Witesman
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Curtis Child
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Get access

Summary

To what extent are contemporary scholars using the ten explanations of the nonprofit sector described in Chapter 2? The authors use scholarship, or published academic articles, as data to answer this question. They find that the ten nonprofit-sector theories continue to be an important foundation for nonprofit studies research. The most commonly used sector theories are associationalism, contract failure, nonprofit/government interdependence, and social origins. However, their analysis suggests that use of the nonprofit-sector theories is merely ceremonial. Nonprofit scholars could do much more to question, develop, and refine the existing sector theories – or to develop new ones. This research highlights the importance of a book like this one to encourage scholars to discuss and question existing sector theories and pose new sector-theory contributions to better understand the nonprofit sector.

Keywords

bibliometricmarket-failure theorysupply-side theorysocial-origins theoryinterdependence theorythe commonsmediating structuresassociationalismnonprofit studiesnonprofit-sector theory
Type
Chapter
Information
Reimagining Nonprofits
Sector Theory in the Twenty-First Century
 , pp. 41 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, L., Chen, X., Flanigan, S. T., Keyes-Williams, J., Vasavada, T. S., & Saidel, J. R. (2007). Toward doctoral education in nonprofit and philanthropic studies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4_suppl), 51S–63S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007305054Google Scholar
Anheier, H. K. (2006). Nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In Powell, W. W. & Anheier, H. K. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 89–114). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Anheier, H. K., & Ben-Ner, A. (2003). The study of nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Badelt, C. (1990). Institutional choice and organizational behavior in the third sector. In Anheier, H. K. & Seibel, W. (Eds.), The third sector: Comparative studies of nonprofit organizations. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110868401Google Scholar
Badelt, C. (1997). Entrepreneurship theories of the non-profit sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bator, F. M. (1958). The anatomy of market failure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882231Google Scholar
Ben-Ner, A. (1986). Nonprofit organizations: Why do they exist in market economies? The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy, 1, 94–113.Google Scholar
Ben-Ner, A. (2002). The shifting boundaries of the mixed economy and the future of the nonprofit sector. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8292.00184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Ner, A., & Gui, B. (2003). The theory of nonprofit organizations revisited. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 3–26). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_1Google Scholar
Ben-Ner, A., & Van Hoomissen, T. (1991). Nonprofit organizations in the mixed economy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62(4), 519–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.1991.tb01366.xGoogle Scholar
Berger, P., & Neuhaus, R. (2021). To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (4th ed.) (pp. 350–361). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367696559-32Google Scholar
Berry, J. M. (2003). A voice for nonprofits. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165Google Scholar
Bode, I. (2006). Disorganized welfare mixes: Voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(4), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706068273Google Scholar
Boschee, J. (2001). Eight basic principles for nonprofit entrepreneurs. Nonprofit World, 19(4), 15–18.Google Scholar
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government–nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.203Google Scholar
Brudney, J. L., & Durden, T. K. (1993). Twenty years of the Journal of Voluntary Action Research/Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly: An assessment of past trends and future directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764093223004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushouse, B. K., & Sowa, J. E. (2012). Producing knowledge for practice: Assessing NVSQ 2000–2010. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011422116Google Scholar
Chaves, M. (1998). The religious ethic and the spirit of nonprofit entrepreneurship. In Powell, W. W. & Clemens, E. S. (Eds.), Private action and the public good. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, E. S. (2006). Constitution of citizens: Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 207–220). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, E. S. (2016). The constitution of citizens: Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (pp. 261–275). Routledge.Google Scholar
Cordes, J. J., Steuerle, C. E., & Twombly, E. (2004). Dimensions of nonprofit entrepreneurship: An exploratory essay. In D. Holtz-Eakin & H.S. Rosen (Eds.). Public Policy and the Economics of Entrepreneurship (pp. 115–148). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coston, J. M. (1998). A model and typology of government–NGO relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(3), 358–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764098273006Google Scholar
Darden, L., & Maull, N. (1977). Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science, 44(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/288723Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. (1988). Democracy in America: And two essays on America. Penguin UK.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. (1995). Comments on “What theory is not.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 391–397. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393790Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Anheier, H. K. (1990). The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 137–159. www.jstor.org/stable/2393790Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (1987). Political theories of nonprofit organization. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (1st ed.) (Vol. 43, p. 45). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, B., & Foley, M. W. (1998). Civil society and social capital beyond Putnam. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(1), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642980420010Google Scholar
Edwards, B., & Foley, M. W. (2001). Civil society and social capital: A primer. In Beyond Tocqueville: Civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective (pp. 1–14). University Press of New England Hanover.Google Scholar
Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 582–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009333686Google Scholar
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsevier. (2021). About Scopus – Abstract and citation database. Scopus. www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopusGoogle Scholar
Froelich, K. A., & Knoepfle, T. W. (1996). Internal Revenue Service 990 data: Fact or fiction? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764096251004Google Scholar
Froelich, K. A., Knoepfle, T. W., & Pollak, T. H. (2000). Financial measures in nonprofit organization research: Comparing IRS 990 return and audited financial statement data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000292002Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., & Shleifer, A. (2001). Not-for-profit entrepreneurs. Journal of Public Economics, 81(1), 99–115. doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00130-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, T., Khumawala, S. B., Kraut, M. A., & Meade, J. A. (2007). The quality and reliability of Form 990 data: Are users being misled? Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal; Arden, 11, 27.Google Scholar
Grønbjerg, K. A. (2016). Changing shape of government-nonprofit relations. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), Nature of the nonprofit sector (pp. 235–237). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367696559-22Google Scholar
Handy, F. (1997). Coexistence of nonprofit, for-profit and public sector institutions. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 68(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8292.00043Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. (1979). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–902.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. (1981). The rationale for exempting nonprofit organizations from corporate income taxation. Yale Law Journal, 91(1), 54–101.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. (2003). The role of trust in nonprofit enterprise. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 115–122). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_6Google Scholar
Hügel, S. (2020). PyZotero (1.4.10). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2917290Google Scholar
Jackson, S. K., Guerrero, S., & Appe, S. (2014). The state of nonprofit and philanthropic studies doctoral education. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 795–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014549056Google Scholar
James, E. (1987). Nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In Powell, W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (1st ed.) (Vol. 43, p. 45). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
James, E. (1989). The nonprofit sector in international perspective: Studies in comparative culture and policy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, E. (1990). Economic theories of the nonprofit sector: A comparative perspective. In Anheier, H. K. & Seibel, W. (Eds.), The third sector: Comparative studies of nonprofit organizations. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110868401.21Google Scholar
James, E., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (2013). The non-profit enterprise in market economics. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315015163Google Scholar
Kamerāde, D., Crotty, J., & Ljubownikow, S. (2016). Civil liberties and volunteering in six former Soviet Union countries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(6), 1150–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976401664968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, C. H., Baek, Y. M., & Kim, E. H.-J. (2021). Half a century of NVSQ: Thematic stability across years and editors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 08997640211017676. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211017676Google Scholar
Kingma, B. R. (2003). Public good theories of the nonprofit sector. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 53–65). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_3Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (2000). A third sector in the third millennium? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 11(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008914531485Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M., Kramer, R. M., & Wilensky, H. L. (1981). Voluntary agencies in the welfare state. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Krashinsky, M. (1984). Transactions costs and a theory of the non-profit organization. (Working Paper #84). Program on Non-Profit Organizations, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University.Google Scholar
Lecy, J. (2020). Nonprofit open data collective. Nonprofit Open Data Collective. https://nonprofit-open-data-collective.github.io//Google Scholar
LePere-Schloop, M., & Nesbit, R. (2022a). Disciplinary contributions to nonprofit studies: A 20-year empirical mapping of journals publishing nonprofit research and journal citations by nonprofit scholars. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_suppl), 68S–101S. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221119728Google Scholar
LePere-Schloop, M., & Nesbit, R. (2022b) The nexus of public administration, public policy, and nonprofit studies: An empirical mapping of research topics and knowledge integration. Public Administration Review, 83(3), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13587Google Scholar
Lipsky, M., & Smith, S. R. (1989). Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state. Political Science Quarterly, 104(4), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151102Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1989). And lettuce is nonanimal: Toward a positive economics of voluntary action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18(4), 367–383.Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1992a). The commons: A multidisciplinary approach to nonprofit organization, voluntary action, and philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640920210030Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1992b). The commons: New perspectives on nonprofit organization, voluntary action and philanthropy. Faculty Scholarship, 754. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications/754Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1995). Commons: Can this be the name of “thirdness”? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (2011). 14. Deliberation and dialogue and commons theory. In Resolving community conflicts and problems (pp. 264–276). Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (2015). Voluntary action in new commons. Faculty Scholarship, 760. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications/760Google Scholar
Loper, E., & Bird, S. (2002). NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0205028Google Scholar
Ma, J., & Konrath, S. (2018). A century of nonprofit studies: Scaling the knowledge of the field. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(6), 1139–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00057-5Google Scholar
Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Mirabella, R. M. (2007). University-based educational programs in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies: A 10-year review and projections of future trends. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4_suppl), 11S–27S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007305051Google Scholar
Mirabella, R. M., & Wish, N. B. (2000). The “best place” debate: A comparison of graduate education programs for nonprofit managers. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00082Google Scholar
National Academies. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11153Google Scholar
Ortmann, A., & Schlesinger, M. (1997). Trust, repute and the role of non-profit enterprise. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354189Google Scholar
Ortmann, A., & Schlesinger, M. (2003). Trust, repute, and the role of nonprofit enterprise. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 77–114). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_5Google Scholar
Paarlberg, L. E., LePere-Schloop, M., Walk, M., Ai, J., & Ming, Y. (2020). Activating community resilience: The emergence of COVID-19 funds across the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(6), 1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020968155Google Scholar
Paarlberg, L. E., Nesbit, R., Clerkin, R. M., & Christensen, R. K. (2019). The politics of donations: Are red counties more donative than blue counties? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(2), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018804088Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Cohen, A. S., & Perreault, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781775841Google Scholar
Preston, A. E. (1988). The nonprofit firm: A potential solution to inherent market failures. Economic Inquiry, 26(3), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01511.xGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664–683. https://doi.org/10.2307/420517Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1992). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-yGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996). Altruism, nonprofits, and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 701–728. www.jstor.org/stable/2729219Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1987a). Partners in public service. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (1st ed., Vol. 43, p. 45). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1987b). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1–2), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976408701600104Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (2003). Voluntary failure theory correctly viewed. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 183–186). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_11Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (2016). Market failure. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), Nature of the nonprofit sector (pp. 230–234). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367696559-21Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1997). Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(3), 213–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022058200985Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Elliott, O. V. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Toepler, S. (2015). Government–nonprofit cooperation: Anomaly or necessity? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), 2155–2177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9651-6Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Shier, M. L., & Handy, F. (2014). Research trends in nonprofit graduate studies: A growing interdisciplinary field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014548279Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1996). Unravelling from above. The American Prospect, 25, 20–24.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1997). The Tocqueville problem: Civic engagement in American democracy. Social Science History, 21(4), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171662Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life (Vol. 8). University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. P. (2004). Civic engagement in American democracy. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T., Cobb, R. V., & Klofstad, C. A. (2005). Disconnection and reorganization: The transformation of civic life in late-twentieth-century America. Studies in American Political Development, 19(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X0500009XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T., Ganz, M., & Munson, Z. (2000). A nation of organizers: The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585829Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976409402300305Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (1997). Grassroots associations are important: Some theory and a review of the impact literature. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(3), 269–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640972630Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots associations. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (2003). A history of ARNOVA. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(3), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640972630Google Scholar
Smith, S. R., & Grønbjerg, K. A. (2006). Scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 221–242). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (2009). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674043817Google Scholar
Soskis, B. (2006). A history of associational life and the nonprofit sector in the United States. In Powell, W. W. & Bromley, P. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3rd ed.) (pp. 221–242). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. (1997). Overall evaluation of economic theories. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354194Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. (2003). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 277–309). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_16Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. (2006). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 117–139). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). Markets, market failures, and development. The American Economic Review, 79(2), 197–203. www.jstor.org/stable/1827756Google Scholar
Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theiss-Morse, E., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Citizenship and civic engagement. Annual Review of Political Science-Palo Alto, 8, 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104829Google Scholar
Tschirhart, M., & Gazley, B. (2014). Advancing scholarship on membership associations: New research and next steps. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2_suppl), 35–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976401351705Google Scholar
Van Til, J. (2008). Growing civil society: From nonprofit sector to third space. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wan Utap, A. K., Zainab, A. N., & Anuar, N. B. (2009). Bibliometric studies on single journals: A review. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 14(1), Article 1.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2022). Democracy and association. In Democracy and association. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbrod, B. (1977). The voluntary nonprofit sector: An economic analysis. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, B. (1986). Toward a theory of the voluntary nonprofit sector in a three-sector economy. In Rose-Ackerman, S. (Ed.), The economics of nonprofit institutions (pp. 21–44). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, B. (2009). The nonprofit economy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winston, C. (2007). Government failure versus market failure: Microeconomics policy research and government performance. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Wolch, J. R. (1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. Foundation Center.Google Scholar
Wolfram, D. (2003). Applied informetrics for information retrieval research. Greenwood.Google Scholar
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208. www.jstor.org/stable/657866Google Scholar
Wry, T., Cobb, J. A., & Aldrich, H. (2013). More than a metaphor: Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 441–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.781862Google Scholar
Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections: Joining together in America’s fragmented communities. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Young, D. (1980). Entrepreneurship and the behavior of nonprofit organizations: Elements of a theory. Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University.Google Scholar
Young, D. (1983). If not for profit, for what? Lexington Books. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/facbooks2013/1Google Scholar
Young, D. (1989a). Contract failure theory. In Shafriz, J. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (Vol. 3, pp. 230–234). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429045097Google Scholar
Young, D. (1989b). Government failure theory. In Shafriz, J. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (Vol. 1, pp. 235–237). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429045097Google Scholar
Young, D. (1989c). Third party government. In Shafriz, J. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (Vol. 4). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429045097Google Scholar
Young, D. (2000). Alternative models of government–nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291009Google Scholar
Young, D. (2006). Complementary, supplementary or adversarial? Nonprofit-Government Relations. In E. T. Boris & C.E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofit and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 37–80). Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Young, D. (2016a). Contract failure theory. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (3rd ed.) (pp. 230–234). Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, D. (2016b). Government failure theory. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (3rd ed.) (pp. 126–128). Westview Press.Google Scholar
Young, D. (2016c). Third party government. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (3rd ed.) (pp. 323–326). Westview Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×