Summary
‘A Rule, given by a founder with an acknowledged fullness of spiritual wisdom, approved by the Church and tested by the experience of saints, is a safe path, and it is for the religious the only safe path. It comes to him not as a rigid, mechanical code of works, but as a sure guide to one who seeks God, and who seeks that he may indeed find … When once a religious house or a religious order ceases to direct its sons to the abandonment of all that is not God, and ceases to show them the rigours of the narrow way that leads to the imitation of Christ in His Love, it sinks to the level of a purely human institution, and whatever its works may be, they are the works of time and not of eternity. The true monk, in whatever century he is found, looks not to the changing ways around him or to his own mean condition, but to the unchanging everlasting God, and his trust is in the everlasting arms that hold him.’
David Knowles, The Religious Orders in England 1959 iii p. 468.‘While never denying what had been defined, or flouting what had been ordained, by the supreme authority of the Church, [Erasmus] remained as it were agnostic to the thesis that a religious truth could be contained within a theological formula, or a virtuous life regulated by a disciplinary code …
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Religion and Public Doctrine in Modern England , pp. 129 - 156Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1980