Book contents
- The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade Governance
- The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I New and Old Challenges
- Part II Trade Policy and Trade-Related Concerns
- Part III Development Angles
- Part IV Diffusion across Economic Treaties
- 14 Heading for Divorce?
- 15 The Regime Complex for Investment Governance
- 16 Asian Trade Agreements in Services
- Index
- References
16 - Asian Trade Agreements in Services
Filling Form with Content
from Part IV - Diffusion across Economic Treaties
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2019
By
Book contents
- The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade Governance
- The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I New and Old Challenges
- Part II Trade Policy and Trade-Related Concerns
- Part III Development Angles
- Part IV Diffusion across Economic Treaties
- 14 Heading for Divorce?
- 15 The Regime Complex for Investment Governance
- 16 Asian Trade Agreements in Services
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter takes stock of the dense network of trade agreements in services that has evolved in the East Asian region, and considers some of its prospects in the wake of the withdrawal of the United States from the TPP negotiations. Perhaps surprising for a region associated with booming economies, trade agreements in Asia have not always been driven by economic considerations. At the same time, it remains unclear if services trade has been as much a factor in trade agreement formation as in other regions. Based on DESTA data, the chapter shows that services trade (at least in its cross-border and consumption abroad modes) and PTA formation go hand-in-hand in Asia as well, even though the panoply of agreements remains divided by two different and possibly incompatible approaches, as some countries prefer positive lists and others prefer negative lists. With the United States choosing to withdraw from regional PTA projects for the time being, the positive-list approach looks to be the most common in the near future, while liberalization prospects may be limited.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade GovernanceWorld Trade Forum, pp. 388 - 406Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Aggarwal, V. K. 1992. “The Political Economy of Service Sector Negotiations in the Uruguay Round,” Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 16(1):34–4.Google Scholar
Baccini, L. Dür, A., and Elsig, M.. 2014. “The Design of International Trade Agreements: Introducing a New Database,” Review of International Organizations 9(3):353–75.Google Scholar
Baccini, L. Osgood, I., and Weymouth, S.. 2018. The Service Economy: U.S. Trade Coalitions in an Era of Deindustrialization. Unpublished manuscript. Montreal, QC: McGill University.Google Scholar
Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H.. 2004. “Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements,” Journal of International Economics 64(1):29–63.Google Scholar
Borchert, I. Gootiiz, B., and Mattoo, A.. 2011. “Services in Doha: What’s on the Table?” In: Martin, W. and Mattoo, A. (Eds.), Unfinished Business: The WTO’s Doha Agenda. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 115–43.Google Scholar
Borchert, I. and Mattoo, A.. 2010. “The Crisis-Resilience of Services Trade,” The Service Industries Journal 30(13):2115–36.Google Scholar
Breinlich, H. and Criscuolo, C.. 2011. “International Trade in Services: A Portrait of Importers and Exporters,” Journal of International Economics 84(2):188–206.Google Scholar
Brinkley, J. 2017. “Trump Hands China a Gift in Dumping Trans-Pacific Partnership,” Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/johnbrinkley/2017/01/24/trump-dumps-trans-pacific-partnership-sad/, accessed September 27, 2017.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. A. 1997. “North American Trade Negotiations: Liberalization Games between Asymmetric Players,” European Journal of International Relations 3(1):105–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, M. A. and Tomlin, B. W.. 2000. The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Feketekuty, G. 1988. International Trade in Services: An Overview and Blueprint for Negotiations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Francois, J. F. and Hoekman, B.. 2010. “Services Trade and Policy,” Journal of Economic Literature 48(3):642–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francois, J. F. and Pindyuk, O.. 2013. “Consolidated Data on International Trade in Services v8.9.,” IIDE Discussion Paper 20130101. Rotterdam: Institute for International and Development Economics.Google Scholar
Gibler, D. M. 2009. International Military Alliances, 1648 to 2008. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. L. and Deardorff, A. V.. 2006. “Lobbying As Legislative Subsidy,” American Political Science Review 100(1): 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, B. 1995. “Assessing the General Agreement on Trade in Services,” In: Martin, W. and Winters, L. A. (Eds.), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88–124.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. and Kostecki, M. M.. 2010. The Political Economy of the World Trading System. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. and Mattoo, A.. 2000. “Services, Economic Development and the Next Round of Negotiations on Services,” Journal of International Development 12(2):283–96.Google Scholar
Kim, S. Y. and Manger, M. S.. 2017. “Hubs of Governance: Higher-Order Effects of PTA Formation,” Political Science Research and Methods 5(3):467–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, F. and Lee, H.-H.. 2006. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade in Services,” Review of World Economics 142(1):92–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazer, D. 1999. “The Free Trade Epidemic of the 1860s and Other Outbreaks of Economic Discrimination,” World Politics 51(4):447–83.Google Scholar
Manger, M. S. 2014. “The Economic Logic of Asian PTAs: The Role of Intra-Industry Trade,” Journal of East Asian Studies 14(2):151–84.Google Scholar
Mattoo, A. and Low, P.. 2000. “Is There a Better Way? Alternative Approaches to Liberalisation under the GATS,” In: Sauvé, P. and Stern, R. (Eds.), GATS 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 449–72.Google Scholar
Mercurio, B. 2016. “The Flow-On Effect: How the TPP Will Re-Shape Trade Relations in East Asia,” In: Bungenberg, M., Herrmann, C., Krajewski, M., and Terhechte, J. P. (Eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016. European Yearbook of International Economic Law. Cham: Springer, pp. 515–25.Google Scholar
Milner, H. V. 1997. “Industries, Governments, and the Creation of Regional Trade Blocs,” In: Mansfield, E. D. and Milner, H. V. (Eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 77–106.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. 1999. “Structural Gaiatsu: International Finance and Political Change in Japan,” Comparative Political Studies 32(8):907–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravenhill, J. 2009. “East Asian Regionalism: Much Ado about Nothing?” Review of International Studies 35(1):215–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravenhill, J. 2010. The ‘New East Asian Regionalism’: A Political Domino Effect. Review of International Political Economy 17(2), 178–208.Google Scholar
Sauvé, P. 2000. “Developing Countries and the GATS 2000 Round,” Journal of World Trade 34(2):85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K. and Urata, S.. 2010. “On the Use of FTAs by Japanese Firms: Further Evidence,” Business and Politics 12(1):1–15.Google Scholar
Vreeland, J. R. 2006. The International Monetary Fund (IMF): Politics of Conditional Lending. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walter, S. 2010. “Globalization and the Welfare State: Testing the Microfoundations of the Compensation Hypothesis,” International Studies Quarterly 54(2):403–26.Google Scholar
Wang, H. 2017. “The Differences between China’s Recent FTA and the TPP: A Case Study of the China-Korea FTA, In: Chaisse, J, Gao, H., and Lo, C. (Eds.), Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law Rule-Making: TPP as a New Model for Trade Agreements?, Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp. 293–305.Google Scholar
WTO. 2011. World Trade Report 2011: The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-Existence to Coherence. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar