Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- List of sign language abbreviations
- Notational conventions
- 1 Introduction
- I HISTORY AND TRANSMISSION
- II SHARED CROSSLINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS
- III VARIATION AND CHANGE
- 18 Sign languages in West Africa
- 19 Sign languages in the Arab world
- 20 Variation in American Sign Language
- 21 Sociolinguistic variation in British, Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages
- 22 Variation in East Asian sign language structures
- 23 Crosslinguistic variation in prosodic cues
- 24 Deixis in an emerging sign language
- 25 The grammar of space in two new sign languages
- Notes
- References
- Index
24 - Deixis in an emerging sign language
from III - VARIATION AND CHANGE
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- List of sign language abbreviations
- Notational conventions
- 1 Introduction
- I HISTORY AND TRANSMISSION
- II SHARED CROSSLINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS
- III VARIATION AND CHANGE
- 18 Sign languages in West Africa
- 19 Sign languages in the Arab world
- 20 Variation in American Sign Language
- 21 Sociolinguistic variation in British, Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages
- 22 Variation in East Asian sign language structures
- 23 Crosslinguistic variation in prosodic cues
- 24 Deixis in an emerging sign language
- 25 The grammar of space in two new sign languages
- Notes
- References
- Index
Summary
Introduction
If you look closely at any sign language, you will soon discover familiar local gestures – nods, hand signals, even facial expressions – embedded within the language stream. At least, these signs appear familiar. However, their meanings, and the way they are combined with other signs, differ in many ways from their gesture lookalikes. Evidently, the first signers of these languages adopted everyday gestures as raw materials and used them to build the language. Once the gestures became part of a language, their functions changed.
These functions go beyond basic vocabulary. Many researchers of sign languages have suggested that gestures from the ambient culture were a source of grammatical elements too (Newport & Supalla 2000, Casey 2003, Wilcox 2004). Studies comparing gestures with contemporary signs support such an account. For example, a Jordanian hand gesture meaning ‘wait a second’ appears to have been co-opted as a negative completive marker in Jordanian Sign Language (Hendriks, 2004), and a French gesture meaning ‘to go’ is the likely source of a future marker in American Sign Language (ASL) (Janzen & Shaffer 2002). There are nonmanual examples too: the raising of eyebrows often seen on the faces of English speakers when they produce conditional sentences appears to be the origin of the eyebrow raise required with conditional expressions in ASL (Pyers & Emmorey 2007), and common American head movements and body postures have apparently been reshaped into ASL markers of negation and role shift (McClave 2000, 2001).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sign Languages , pp. 543 - 569Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
- 38
- Cited by