Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:46:48.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Sustainability Assessment: Integrative Concept, Methodology, and Examples

from Part II - Integrative Approaches for Sustainability Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2020

By
Volker Stelzer  and
Jürgen Kopfmüller
Edited by
Claudia R. Binder ,
Romano Wyss  and
Emanuele Massaro
Claudia R. Binder
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Romano Wyss
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Emanuele Massaro
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Get access

Summary

The Integrative Concept of Sustainable Development (ICoS) was developed through an intensive process in order to operationalise the guiding rules of sustainable development in an interdisciplinary team. Through its three general sustainability goals and 25 sustainability rules, ICoS establishes that indicators are part of a step-wise, systematic, and consistent construction that links theoretical abstraction to deliberative action: the political and societal practice of sustainable development (Barton & Kopfmüller, 2012, p. 84). The application of the concept is presented through two examples: a completed project in Santiago de Chile, and a project currently being developed, which will enable the calculation of regional sustainable energy balances.

Keywords

Sustainability Solution Spaceurban sustainabilityindicatorsustainability assessmentparticipatoryexperttrade-offssystemicnormative
Type
Chapter
Information
Sustainability Assessment of Urban Systems , pp. 161 - 180
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acker-Widmaier, G. (1999). Intertemporale Gerechtigkeit und nachhaltiges Wirtschaften. Zur normativen Begründung eines Leitbildes. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.Google Scholar
Barton, J., Jordan, F. R., León, A. S. M., & Solis, M. O. (2007). ¿Cuán sustentable es la Región Metropolitana de Santiago? Metodologías de evaluación de la sustentabilidad. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), pp. 65–70.Google Scholar
Barton, J., & Kopfmüller, J. (2012). Sustainable urban development in Santiago de Chile: Background – concept – challenges. In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martinez, F. (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbacher, D. (1999). Kommentargutachten, beauftragt im Rahmen des HGF-Projekts „Untersuchung zu einem integrativen Konzept nachhaltiger Entwicklung. Bestandsaufnahme, Problemanalyse, Weiterentwicklung.” Düsseldorf Edition.Google Scholar
Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., Kopfmüller, J., & Paetau, M. (2001). Das integrative Konzept: Mindestbedingungen nachhaltiger Entwicklung. In Grunwald, A, Coenen, R, Nitsch, J, Sydow, A, & Wiedemann, P (eds.), Forschungswerkstatt Nachhaltigkeit – Wege zur Diagnose und Therapie von Nachhaltigkeitsdefiziten. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 79–102.Google Scholar
Bräutigam, K.-R., Gonzalez, T., Szanto, M., Seifert, H., & Vogdt, J. (2012). Municipal solid waste management in Santiago de Chile: Challenges and perspectives towards sustainability. In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martínez, F (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 279–301.Google Scholar
Brown-Weiss, E. (1989). In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony and Intergenerational Equity. Dobbs Ferry, NY: The United Nations University and Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
District Future – Urban Lab. (2018). www.itas.kit.edu/english/num_current_paro11_quazu.php (accessed 26.4.2018).Google Scholar
Emmrich, R., & Melzer, M. (2012). Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept der HGF als Baustein der Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 171–188.Google Scholar
Energy Ministry. (2013). Balance National de Energía 2012. Santiago de Chile. www.minenergia.cl/documentos/balance-energetico.html (accessed 10.11.2018).Google Scholar
ES 2050. (2018). Energy System 2050: A Contribution of the Research Field Energy. www.helmholtz.de/en/research/energy/energy_system_2050/ (accessed 26.4.2018).Google Scholar
Fuss, M., Vasconcelos Barros, R. T., & Poganietz, W. R. (2018). Designing a framework for municipal solid waste management towards sustainability in emerging economy countries: An application to a case study in Belo Horizonte (Brazil). Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, pp. 655–664.Google Scholar
Grunwald, A., Coenen, R., Nitsch, J., Sydow, A., & Wiedemann, P. (2001). Forschungswerkstatt Nachhaltigkeit: Wege zur Diagnose und Therapie von Nachhaltigkeitsdefiziten. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar
Hartlieb, N., Bräutigam, K.-R., Kopfmüller, J., Sardeman, G., Achternbosch, M., & Kupsch, C. (2012). Das Nachhaltigkeitskonzept im Kontext der Abfallwirtschaft. Anwendung auf das Beispiel der Cadmiumstoffströme. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 213–233.Google Scholar
Hartmuth, G., Huber, K., & Rink, D. (2012). Downscaling von Nachhaltigkeit: Das Integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept als Bauplan für kommunale Indikatorensysteme. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, D., Krellenberg, K., Hansjürgens, B., & Martínez, F. (2012). Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Jörissen, J., Coenen, R., & Stelzer, V. (2005). Zukunftsfähiges Wohnen und Bauen. Herausforderungen, Defizite, Strategien. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar
Justen, A., Martinez, F., Lenz, B., & Cortés, C. (2012). Santiago 2030: Perspectives on the urban transport system. In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martínez, F (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 207–227.Google Scholar
Kopfmüller, J. (2006). Das integrative Konzept nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Motivation, Architektur, Perspektiven. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edtion sigma, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
Kopfmüller, J. (2011). The integrative sustainability concept of the Helmholtz Association. The “Risk Habitat Megacity” project as a case of application. In: Banse, G, Nelson, G. L., & Parodi, O (eds.), Sustainable Development – The Cultural Perspective. Concepts – Aspects – Examples. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 137–149.Google Scholar
Kopfmüller, J., Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., et al. (2001). Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet. Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar
Kopfmüller, J., Barton, J., & Salas, A. (2012). How sustainable is Santiago? In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martínez, F (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 305–326.Google Scholar
Lehn, H., McPhee, J., Vogdt, J., et al. (2012). Risks and opportunities for sustainable management of water resources and services in Santiago de Chile. In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martínez, F (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 251–278.Google Scholar
Ministry of Planning. (2006). Final results of energy sector in metropolitan region, year 2006. Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
MINVU – Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo (2006). Manual de aplicación, Reglamentación térmica. MINVU e Instituto de la Contrucción. Santiago de Chile. www.sodal.cl/files/1_Manual%20A%20 R%20 T.pdf (accessed 10.11.2018).Google Scholar
National Institute of Statistics (2011). Electric generation and distribution. Historical series: Electric distribution by sector in GWh, years 1997–2010. Santiago de Chile. www.ine.cl/canales/chile_estadistico/estadisticas_economicas/energia/series_estadisticas/series_estadisticas.php (accessed 10.11.2018).Google Scholar
Nayono, S., Lehmann, A., Kopfmüller, J., & Lehn, H. (2016). Improving sustainability by technology assessment and systems analysis: The case of IWRM Indonesia. Applied Water Science, 6(3), 279–292. DOI:http://0.1007/s13201-016-0427-y.Google Scholar
Parodi, O. (2008). Technik am Fluss: Philosophische und kulturwissenschaftliche Betrachtungen zum Wasserbau als kulturelle Unternehmung. Munich: oekom.Google Scholar
Paulesich, R. (2012). EaseyX. Der HGF-Ansatz in einem Modell zur Bewertung börsennotierter Unternehmen. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 189–212.Google Scholar
Quevedo, D.L. (Ed.) (2010). Escenarios Energéticos Chile 2030. Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
Quitzow, R., Ollier, L., Bangert, A., et al. (2018). Multikriterieller Bewertungsansatz für eine nachhaltige Energiewende: Von der Analyse zur Entscheidungsfindung mit ENavi. Potsdam: IAAS.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rösch, C., Raab, K., Skarka, J., & Stelzer, V. (2007). Energie aus dem Grünland: Eine nachhaltige Entwicklung? Karlsruhe: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis. www.itas.kit.edu/english/num_completed_roes03_gruen.php (accessed 12.10.2018).Google Scholar
Rösch, C., Skarka, J., Raab, K., & Stelzer, V. (2009). Energy production from grassland: Assessing the sustainability of different process chains under German conditions. Biomass & Bioenergy, 33(4), 689–700. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.10.008.Google Scholar
Rösch, C., Bräutigam, K. -R., Kopfmüller, J., Stelzer, V., & Lichtner, P. (2017). Indicator system for the sustainability assessment of the German energy system and its transition. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 7(1), 1–13. DOI:10.1186/s13705-016-0103-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rösch, C., Bräutigam, K. -R., Kopfmüller, J., Stelzer, V., Lichtner, P., & Fricke, A. (2018). Indicator-based Sustainability Assessment of the German Energy System and its Transition. Karlsruhe: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Schäfer, M. (2012). Der Beitrag wirtschaftlicher Akteure zu nachhaltiger Entwicklung und Lebensqualität. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 115–137.Google Scholar
Schidler, S. (2012). Interdisziplinäre Bildung von Nachhaltigkeitskriterien. Fallbeispiel Nachwachsende Rohstoffe: Grüne Bioraffinerie. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 157–169.Google Scholar
Schultz, J., Brand, F., Kopfmüller, J., & Ott, K. (2008). Building a “theory of sustainable development”: Two salient conceptions within the German discourse. International Journal for Environment and Sustainable Development, 7(4), 465–482. DOI:10.1504/IJESD.2008.022390.Google Scholar
Schumacher, U., Bonas, I., & Tisch, A. (2012): Gemeinschaftseinrichtungen zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung in Brandenburg. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar
Simon, S., Stelzer, V., Quintero, A., et al. (2010). Thematic field: Energy. In Krellenberg, K, Kopfmüller, J, & Barton, J (eds.), How Sustainable is Santiago de Chile? Current Performance – Future Trends – Potential Measures: Synthesis Report of the Risk Habitat Megacity Research Initiative (2007–2011). Leipzig: UFZ.Google Scholar
Simon, S., Stelzer, V., Vargas, L., Gonzalo, P., Quintero-Márquez, A., & Kopfmüller, J. (2012). Energy systems. In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martínez, F (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 183–205.Google Scholar
Spangenberg, J. (2005). Die ökonomische Nachhaltigkeit der Wirtschaft. Theorien, Kriterien und Indikatoren. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar
Stelzer, V., Kopfmüller, J., & Simon, S. (2010). Nachhaltige Energieversorgung in Megacities. Das Beispiel Santiago de Chile. Technikfolgenabschätzung Theorie und Praxis, 19(3), 30–38.Google Scholar
Stelzer, V., Knapp, M., Meyer, R., & Pehle, A. (2017). Integrative sustainability assessment to evaluate OUI biomass scenarios over URR. In Schumacher, K, Fichtner, K. W., and Schultmann, F (eds.), Innovations for Sustainable Biomass Utilisation in the Upper Rhine Region. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, pp. 218–226.Google Scholar
Stelzer, V., Quintero, A., Vargas, L., et al. (2014). Indicator based sustainability analysis of future energy situation of Santiago de Chile. In Awrejcewicz, J, Shitikova, M, Niola, V, Panagopoulos, T, Wenzel, W, Gorunescu, F, Horova, I, & Korobeinikov, A (eds.), Energy, Environment, Biology and Biomedicine. Prague: WSEAS – World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society. ISBN: 978–1-61804–232-3, pp. 24–27.Google Scholar
UN – United Nations (1992a). Agenda 21. New York: United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (accessed 12.10.2018).Google Scholar
UN – United Nations (1992b). Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992, Annex I, Rio declaration on environment and development. A/CONF.151/26(I). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN – United Nations (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. New York: United Nations. www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (accessed 12.10.2018).Google Scholar
WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×