Book contents
- Things and Stuff
- Things and Stuff
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors and their Affiliations
- Preface
- 1 Editorial Introduction: Background to the Count–Mass Distinction
- Large-Scale Architectures for Count and Mass
- Implications from Individual Languages
- 6 Mass-to-Count Shifts in the Galilee Dialect of Palestinian Arabic
- 7 Object Mass Nouns as an Arbiter for the Count–Mass Category
- 8 Bare Nouns and the Count–Mass Distinction: A Pilot Study Across Languages
- 9 Counting (on) Bare Nouns: Revelations from American Sign Language
- Compositional Analyses and Theoretical Issues
- New Empirical Approaches to the Semantics of the Count–Mass Distinction
- References
- Language Index
- Subject Index
9 - Counting (on) Bare Nouns: Revelations from American Sign Language
from Implications from Individual Languages
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2021
- Things and Stuff
- Things and Stuff
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors and their Affiliations
- Preface
- 1 Editorial Introduction: Background to the Count–Mass Distinction
- Large-Scale Architectures for Count and Mass
- Implications from Individual Languages
- 6 Mass-to-Count Shifts in the Galilee Dialect of Palestinian Arabic
- 7 Object Mass Nouns as an Arbiter for the Count–Mass Category
- 8 Bare Nouns and the Count–Mass Distinction: A Pilot Study Across Languages
- 9 Counting (on) Bare Nouns: Revelations from American Sign Language
- Compositional Analyses and Theoretical Issues
- New Empirical Approaches to the Semantics of the Count–Mass Distinction
- References
- Language Index
- Subject Index
Summary
This paper deals with ASL nouns and demonstrates (despite previous suggestions in the literature) that ASL belongs to Chierchia’s group (III), i.e. languages without overt number marking and a visible countability distinction. Although the countability distinction appears to be hidden at first glance, it can be flushed out. I account for the phenomenon in terms of properties of [n+__ ], showing that the countability distinction must be grammatical in ASL. This paper is thus a first step towards an examination of the count/mass distinction in ASL. We find that as predicted by the previous literature (Chierchia 2010, Deal 2017), the countability distinction in ASL, albeit not being immediately visible at all, is connected to number marking.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Things and StuffThe Semantics of the Count-Mass Distinction, pp. 213 - 234Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
- 2
- Cited by