Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T21:21:35.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2018

Leonie James
Affiliation:
University of Kent, Canterbury
Get access

Summary

Given the density of the narrative presented in this book, it is in order to summarise my key contentions. This book provides a definitive account of all of Laud's Scottish-related activities, from his initial visit to Scotland with James VI…I in June 1617 to his execution in January 1645. Although arguing that he was not the first archbishop of Canterbury to take an interest in the Scottish church, the book shows that he was the first English archbishop to be given relatively free rein to intervene in Scottish church affairs by his royal master, Charles I. Laud's unparalleled position as senior ecclesiastical adviser to the king, who shared his love of ceremony and his preference for order and uniformity, gave him unprecedented access to a church which lay beyond his formal jurisdiction. If his status at court gave him the opportunity to intervene in Scotland, his antipathy towards Presbyterianism provided the motive. During the 1630s, he had no official authority outside the Church of England, but he used his position within the English church to extend his remit beyond English borders, all the while operating outside institutional boundaries to become involved in as many aspects of crown policy in Scotland as possible. Laud did not work in isolation – he needed at least a few of the Scottish bishops ‘on side’ to implement such core policies as the canons and prayer book – but he was a force to be reckoned with when it came to putting in place the king's and his own wish to harmonise Scottish worship with English church practice. Although some of the Caroline episcopate were definitely on the conservative side, in terms of seventeenth-century religion, the bishops in Scotland cannot really be described as ‘Laudian’ as a whole, but they did their level best to comply with the king's and Laud's commands because, as the archbishop made clear, they would not prosper if they failed in this endeavour. Recognising the implications for their church, yet unable to challenge the king directly, most of the Scottish bishops were caught between a rock and a hard place. All they could do was perhaps delay proceedings and try to ensure that core policies like canons and prayer book were in a form as acceptable as possible to Scottish worshippers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Leonie James, University of Kent, Canterbury
  • Book: 'This Great Firebrand': William Laud and Scotland, 1617-1645
  • Online publication: 15 February 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Leonie James, University of Kent, Canterbury
  • Book: 'This Great Firebrand': William Laud and Scotland, 1617-1645
  • Online publication: 15 February 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Leonie James, University of Kent, Canterbury
  • Book: 'This Great Firebrand': William Laud and Scotland, 1617-1645
  • Online publication: 15 February 2018
Available formats
×