Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Series editors' preface
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: the new collective security
- PART I Law and politics in United Nations reform
- PART II Defining “threats” to collective security
- PART III Prevention and responses
- 7 On the far side of conflict: the UN Peacebuilding Commission as optical illusion
- 8 The new peacebuilding architecture: an institutional innovation of the United Nations
- 9 The World Summit process and UN sanctions reform: between rhetoric and force
- 10 The UN response to the evolving threat of global terrorism: institutional reform, rivalry, or renewal?
- 11 International justice and collective security: between pragmatism and principle
- PART IV Perspectives on the ground
- Bibliography
- Index
7 - On the far side of conflict: the UN Peacebuilding Commission as optical illusion
from PART III - Prevention and responses
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Series editors' preface
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: the new collective security
- PART I Law and politics in United Nations reform
- PART II Defining “threats” to collective security
- PART III Prevention and responses
- 7 On the far side of conflict: the UN Peacebuilding Commission as optical illusion
- 8 The new peacebuilding architecture: an institutional innovation of the United Nations
- 9 The World Summit process and UN sanctions reform: between rhetoric and force
- 10 The UN response to the evolving threat of global terrorism: institutional reform, rivalry, or renewal?
- 11 International justice and collective security: between pragmatism and principle
- PART IV Perspectives on the ground
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The past as prologue
On October 24, 2005, sixty years after its creation, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a voluminous resolution, A/RES/60/1, reflecting the outcome of a lengthy process that culminated in a World Summit meant to bring the United Nations into the twenty-first century. One of the main features of this resolution was the establishment of a Peacebuilding Commission “as an intergovernmental advisory body.”
While this, at first blush, would seem to be a major accomplishment, it is in fact a disappointing ending to a long process that at certain times carried considerable promise. The decisions that led to the creation of a Commission with only a fraction of its potential were driven by the politically charged concept of “UN reform.”
As a rule, organizations develop organically, and if they don't adapt to external changes they either die, as the League of Nations did, or they become a historical relic functioning on the margins, like the symphony orchestra – dressed up in the symbols of a bygone era. Those who see the UN as a viable institution, and therefore fear its ability to set global standards and make sovereignty into a relative term, would like to see its powers diminished. They hope to achieve this by depicting the organization as a corrupt and outdated entity that requires “reform,” much as a delinquent is sent away to an institution where a few decades of austerity and hard labor will drive out the evil spirits.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- United Nations Reform and the New Collective Security , pp. 195 - 211Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
- 2
- Cited by