Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T07:46:48.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2025

Asha Hornsby
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Allen, Grant, ‘Some New Books’, Fortnightly Review, 26.151 (July 1879), 144–54.Google Scholar
Arnold, Matthew, ‘The Function of Criticism at the Present Time’, in Essays in Criticism (1864; Oxford: Clarendon, 1918), pp.936Google Scholar
Axon, W. E. A., ‘The Poets as Protectors of Animals’, Vegetarian Messenger and Health Review, 7 (June 1910), 189–93.Google Scholar
Ayer, Frederick F., ‘Poem on Vivisection: Written by Browning as Protest against “Infamous Practice”’ [Letter to the Editor], New York Tribune (12 February 1908), 7.Google Scholar
Aytoun, William Edmonstoune, Dublin University Magazine, 70.419 (November 1867), 587–600.Google Scholar
, B. J., ‘A Sad, Sad Story (Told chiefly for Little Folks)’, Animal World, 6.66 (1 March 1875), 35.Google Scholar
Baron, J. H., ‘The Brown Dog of University College’, BMJ, 2.4991 (1 September 1956), 547.Google Scholar
Barrett, Frank, Found Guilty (London: Ward & Downey, 1877).Google Scholar
[Barry, William Francis], ‘Realism and Decadence in French Fiction’, Quarterly Review, 171 (July 1890), 5790.Google Scholar
Bayne, Peter, ‘Thackeray’s Moral Analysis’, Literary World, 21 (1880), 392.Google Scholar
Bell, Ernest, ‘The New Photography and Vivisection’ [Letter to the Editor], Saturday Review, 2105.81 (29 February 1896), 228.Google Scholar
Bell, Ernest, ‘An Afterlife for Animals’, Anti-Vivisectionist Review (June 1911), 323–8.Google Scholar
Berdoe, Edward, Biographical and Historical Notes to Browning’s Complete Works (London: Smith Elder, 1894).Google Scholar
Berdoe, Edward, Browning and the Christian Faith (New York: Haskell House, 1896).Google Scholar
Berdoe, Edward, The Browning Cyclopaedia. A Guide to the Study of the Works of Robert Browning. With Copious Explanatory Notes and References on All Difficult Passages (London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1897).Google Scholar
Berdoe, Edward, Browning’s Message to His Time (London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1890).Google Scholar
Berdoe, Edward, Browning Studies (London: G. Allen, 1895).Google Scholar
Berdoe, Edward, Dying Scientifically: A Key to St Bernard’s (London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1888).Google Scholar
Berdoe, Edward, [Æsculapius Scalpel], St Bernard’s: The Romance of a Medical Student, 2nd ed. (London: Swan Sonnenschein, Lowrey & Co., 1888).Google Scholar
Berdoe, Edward, A Primer of Browning (London: Routledge, 1904).Google Scholar
Bernard, Claude, An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine, trans. Green, Henry Copley (New York: Henry Schuman 1949).Google Scholar
Bernard, Claude, Leçons sur la chaleur animale (Paris: J. B. Baillière, 1876).Google Scholar
Bernard, Claude, ‘Sur la physiologie du cœur et ses rapports avec le cerveau’, in Leçons sur les propriétés des tissus vivants, ed. Alglave, Émile (Paris: Germer Ballière, 1887), pp.421–71.Google Scholar
Blind, Karl, ‘The War Scare’, Examiner, 3511 (15 May 1875), 540–1.Google Scholar
Braddon, Mary Elizabeth, Hostages to Fortune: A Novel, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Bernhard Tauchnitz, 1875).Google Scholar
Brontë, Charlotte, Jane Eyre, ed. Smith, Margaret (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, Anthony, SPCA Founding Statement (London: Whiteside and Fenn, 1824).Google Scholar
Browne, J. H. B., ‘Theophrastus Such’, Westminster Review, 112 (July 1879), 185–96.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert, ‘Arcades Ambo’, Zoophilist, 9.9 (1 January 1890), 192.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert, ‘Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came’, in The Complete Poetic and Dramatic Works of Robert Browning, ed. Scudder, Horace E. (Cambridge, MA: Houghton, Mifflin & Co., 1895), pp.287–9.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert, ‘Tray’, in The Complete Poetic and Dramatic Works of Robert Browning, ed. Scudder, Horace E. (Cambridge, MA: Houghton, Mifflin & Co., 1895), 887.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert, The Paracelsus of Robert Browning, ed. Pollock Denison, Christina (1835; New York: Baker & Taylor, 1911).Google Scholar
Browning, Robert, The Poetical Works of Robert Browning: Volume XV: Parlyings and Asolando, ed. Hawlin, Stefan and Meredith, Michael (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Brunton, Lauder, ‘Vivisection and the Use of Remedies’, Nineteenth Century: A Monthly Review, 11.61 (March 1882), 479–87.Google Scholar
Bryan, Benjamin, (ed.), The Vivisector’s Directory (London: VSS, 1884).Google Scholar
Buchanan, Robert, The City of Dream, An Epic Poem (London: Chatto & Windus, 1888)Google Scholar
Buchanan, Robert, ‘The City without God’, The Monthly Record and Animals Guardian, June 1901, 66–7.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Robert, ‘The Fleshly School of Poetry: Mr D. G. Rossetti’, Contemporary Review, 18 (October 1871), 334–50.Google Scholar
Burdon-Sanderson, John (ed.), et al., Handbook for the Physiological Laboratory, 2 vols. (London: J. A. Churchill, 1873).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Thomas M. D., Physiology or Mechanism of Blushing; Illustrative of the Influence of Mental Emotion of the Capillary Circulation; General View of the Sympathies, the Organic Reactions of Those Structures with Which They Seem to Be Connected (London: John Churchill, 1839).Google Scholar
Burton, Robert, The Anatomy of Melancholy (Oxford: John Lichfield and James Short, 1621).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, SamuelAn Occasional Reflection on Dr Charlton’s Feeling a Dog’s Pulse at Gresham-College. By R. B. Esq to Lyndamore’, in The Genuine Remains in Verse and Prose of Mr Samuel Butler, ed. Thyer, R., 2 vols. (London: J. & R. Tonson, 1759), I, pp.404–10.Google Scholar
Caird, Mona, Beyond the Pale: An Appeal on Behalf of the Victims of Vivisection (London: William Reeves, 1897).Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis, ‘Fame’s Penny Trumpet’ (published privately, 1876).Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis, Some Popular Fallacies about Vivisection (Oxford: [n.pub], 1875).Google Scholar
Cassidy, J., The Gift of Life (London: Chapman & Hall, 1897).Google Scholar
Chesterton, G. K., ‘Charlotte Brontë and the Realists’, Brontë Society Transaction, 4.16 (1907), 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, A. P., [Letter to the Editors of the Scotsman and Daily Review April 1877], reprinted in Home Chronicler, 4.90 (9 March 1878), 149.Google Scholar
Clark, S. E., ‘The Science of Thought’ [Letter to the Editor], Zoophilist, 7.2 (1 June 1887), 26–7.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. H., ‘Mr. Coleridge’s Gentleman-Like Amenities’ [Letter to the Editor], BMJ, 1.2210 (9 May 1903), 1117–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, A Charity and a Controversy (London: VSS, 1889).Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, The Confessions of a Lost Dog, Reported by her Mistress (London: Griffith & Farran, 1867).Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, The Duties of Women: A Course of Lectures (London: William & Norgate, 1881).Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, ‘The Education of the Emotions’, Fortnightly Review, 49 (February 1888), 223–36.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, False Beasts and True, Essays on Natural (and Unnatural) History (London: Ward, Lock and Tyler, 1876).Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, The Friend of Man; and his Friends, – The Poets (London: George Bell & Sons, 1889).Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, The Higher Expediency (London: VSS, 1882), pp.120.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, ‘The Last Words of “Le Zoophile”’, Zoophilist, 3.17 (1 April 1884), 285.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, Life of Frances Power Cobbe as Told by Herself (London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1904).Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, Light in Dark Places (London: VSS, 1883).Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, ‘The Medical Profession and Its Morality’, Modern Review, 2 (1888), 296326.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, ‘Pity, Genuine and Spurious’, Zoophilist, 10.11 (1 March 1891), 210–11.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, ‘Pity, Genuine and Spurious’, Forum, 10 (December 1890), 423–32.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, Public Money (London: VSS, 1892).Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, Science in Excelsis: A New Vision of Judgement, 4th ed. (London: Williams and Norgate, 1883).Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, ‘The Scientific Spirit of the Age’, Contemporary Review, 54 (1888), 126–39.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, ‘The Society’s Annual Meeting’, Zoophilist, 9.3 (1 July 1889), 7687.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power, ‘Vivisection and Its Two-Faced Advocates’, Contemporary Review, 41 (1 January 1882), 610–26.Google Scholar
Colmore, Gertrude, Priests of Progress (London: Stanley Paul & Co., 1908).Google Scholar
Coleridge, Bernard, ‘M. Pasteur’s Researches’, Zoophilist, 7.1 (2 May 1887), 67.Google Scholar
Coleridge, John Duke, ‘The Nineteenth Century Defenders of Vivisection’, 31.182 Fortnightly Review (February 1882), 225–37.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Stephen, An Evening in My Library among the English Poets (London: John Lane, 1916).Google Scholar
Coleridge, Stephen, The Glory of English Prose: Letters to My Grandson (London and New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1922).Google Scholar
Coleridge, Stephen, The Idolatry of Science (London: John Lane, 1920).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Wilkie, Heart and Science: A Story of the Present Time (London: Chatto & Windus, 1884).Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie, ‘Letter to Frances Power Cobbe, 23 June 1882’, reprinted in Frances Power Cobbe, Life of Frances Power Cobbe as Told by Herself (London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1904), 558–9.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie, ‘Letter to Surgeon-General C. A. Gordon, 13 July 1882’, reprinted in Collins, Wilkie, Heart and Science, A Story of the Present Time, ed. Farmer, Steve (Toronto: Broadview, 1997), 371.Google Scholar
Coppard, R., ‘A Caged Lark’s Petition’, Animal World, 14.170 (1 November 1883), 164.Google Scholar
Corelli, Maria, The Master Christian (London: Methuen, 1900).Google Scholar
Élie, Cyon de, ‘The Anti-Vivisectionist Agitation’, Contemporary Review, 43 (1883), 495510.Google Scholar
Élie, Cyon, ‘Le cœur et le cerveau’, Revue scientifique de la France et de l’étranger, 21 (1873), 481–9.Google Scholar
Élie, Cyon, Methodik Der Physiologischen Experimente und Vivisektionen: Mit Atlas (Geissen: J. Ricker’sche Buchhandlung, 1876).Google Scholar
, D. E., ‘L’Art et la vie de Stendhal’ [Review], The Contemporary Review, 12 (November 1869), 479–80.Google Scholar
Dana, Charles L., ‘The Zoophil-Psychosis: A Modern Malady’, Medical Record, 75 (6 March 1909), 381–3.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (London: John Murray, 1871).Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles, The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication (London: John Murray, 1868).Google Scholar
de Pomar, Duke, ‘A Secret Marriage and Its Consequences’, Tinsley’s Magazine, 23 (August 1878), 113–38.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., ‘Review of Daniel Deronda by George Eliot’, Nation (19 October 1876), 245.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles, Great Expectations, ed. Rosenberg, Edgar (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1999).Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles, Oliver Twist, ed. Tillotson, Kathleen (1838; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles, Works of Charles Dickens, The Pickwick Papers, 4 vols. (New York: Hurd & Houghton, 1868), II.Google Scholar
Doyle, Arthur Conan, Memories and Adventures, ed. Kerr, Douglas (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Doveton, F. B., ‘Traps and Torture’, Animal World, 16.187 (1 April 1885), 56.Google Scholar
Drummond, William, Vivisection Forty Years Ago ([1876]; London: Williams & Norgate).Google Scholar
Dudgeon, R. E., ‘Experiments on Human Beings’ (London: BUAV, [n.d.]), 1–14.Google Scholar
Eliot, George, Adam Bede, The Clarendon Edition of the Novels of George Eliot, ed. Martin, Carol A. (1859; Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Eliot, George, Daniel Deronda, The Clarendon Edition of the Novels of George Eliot ed. Handley, Graham (1876; Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Eliot, George, The George Eliot Letters, ed. Haight, Gordon S., 9 vols. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956), IV.Google Scholar
Eliot, George, The Lifted Veil and Brother Jacobs, ed. Small, Helen (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, George, Middlemarch, ed. Carroll, David, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, George, George, Eliot, ‘The Morality of Wilhelm Meister’, Leader, 6.278 (21 July 1855), 703.Google Scholar
Eliot, George, George, Eliot, ‘Silly Novels by Lady Novelists’, Westminster Review, 66 (October 1856), 442–61.Google Scholar
Etherington, George F., Vivisection Investigated and Vindicated (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Richard, 1842).Google Scholar
Filon, Augustin, ‘John Morley: Critique, journaliste et homme d’ état’, Revue des deux mondes (1 November 1891), 164–192.Google Scholar
Foster, Michael, ‘Vivisection’, Macmillan’s Magazine, 29 (1874), 367–76.Google Scholar
Foster, Michael, ‘Vivisection’, This Saturday: A Journal of Choice Reading, 1.12 (March 211874), 329–34.Google Scholar
Foster, Michael, ‘Vivisection’, The Popular Science Monthly, 4.41 (April 1874), 372–85.Google Scholar
Foster, Michael, ‘VivisectionEclectic Magazine of Foreign Literature, Science, and Art, 19.4 (April 1874), 408–17.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Birth of the Clinic (1963; Abingdon: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
, G., , A. P., ‘“The Animal World” at Railway Stations’ [Letter to the Editor], Animal World, 14.162 (1 March 1883), 46.Google Scholar
, G., , S. G., ‘Browning and Tennyson’, Leisure Hour: An Illustrated Magazine for Home Reading, 39 (February 1890), 231–34.Google Scholar
Garner, R. L., ‘The Simian Tongue [I]’, New Review, 4 (1891), 555–62.Google Scholar
Geison, Gerald, Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Gemmer, Caroline M., ‘Treatment of Canaries: A Few Plain Rules’, Animal World, 5.56 (1 May 1874), 91.Google Scholar
Goddard, G. F., ‘A Judgement upon Vivisection from Moralists, Philosophers, and Divines’ [Letter to the Editor], Anti-Vivisectionist, 7.177 (31 January 1880), 67–8.Google Scholar
Goddard, G. F., ‘The Truth Must be Faced’ [Letter to the Editor], Home Chronicler, 4.95 (13 April 1878), 235–6.Google Scholar
Gore, George, The Utility and Morality of Vivisection (London: J. W. Kolckmann, 1882).Google Scholar
Graham, Leonard, The Professor’s Wife: A Story (London: Chatto & Windus, 1881).Google Scholar
Grand, Sarah, The Beth Book, ed. Taylor, Jenny Bourne (London: D. Appleton, 1897).Google Scholar
Hadwen, Walter, Experiments on Living Animals Useless and Cruel. (A Medical View of the Vivisection Question.) An Address (London; BUAV, [n.d.]).Google Scholar
Hadwen, Walter, The Difficulties of Dr Deguerre (London: C. W. Daniel Company, 1926).Google Scholar
Hadwen, Walter, ‘Keep Your Eye on the Death Rates’, Abolitionist, 12.26 (1 December 1926), 137–52.Google Scholar
Hardy, Thomas, ‘Compassion: An Ode. In celebration of the Centenary of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals’, in The Collected Poems of Thomas Hardy with a Portrait (London: Macmillan, 1930), pp.782–3.Google Scholar
Harrison, Frederick, ‘The Duties of Man to the Lower Animals’, Humane Review, 5 (1904), 110.Google Scholar
Helps, Arthur, Some Talk about Animals and Their Masters (London: Strahan & Co., 1873).Google Scholar
Henley, W. E., ‘Monomaniac of Love’ [Review], Academy, 333 (21 September 1878), 289.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, K., ‘Caroline Schlegal’, Fortnightly Review, 11.64 (April 1872), 408–27.Google Scholar
Hirst, F. W., Early Life & Letters of John Morley, 2 vols. (London: Macmillan & Co., 1927), I.Google Scholar
Hoey, J. C., ‘Lothair’, Dublin Review, 15.29 (July 1870), 156–78.Google Scholar
Hoggan, George, ‘Anaesthetics and the Lower Animals’ [Letter to the Editor], Spectator, 2448 (29 May 1875), 690–1.Google Scholar
Hoggan, George, ‘Anaesthetics and the Lower Animals’ [Letter to the Editor], Spectator, 2450 (12 June 1875), 754–5.Google Scholar
Hoggan, George, ‘Vivisection’ [reprinted letter], Spectator, 48.2432 (6 February 1875), 177–8.Google Scholar
Howitt, Mary, ‘Our Four-Footed Friends’, Home Chronicler, 4.95 (13 April 1878), 229–30.Google Scholar
Hutton, R. H., [Review of The Island of Doctor Moreau], Spectator, 76.3537 (11 April 1896), 519–20.Google Scholar
Hutton, R. H., Studies in Parliament: A Series of Sketches of Leading Politicians (London: Longmans, 1866).Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H.An Apologetic Irenicon’, Fortnightly Review, 52 (November 1892), 557–71.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H.Evolution and Ethics’, in Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays (London: Macmillan & Co., 1894), pp.46116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, T. H. Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, ed. Huxley, Leonard, 2 vols. (New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1901), I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, T. H.On the Relation of Man to the Lower Animals’, in Man’s Place in Nature and other Anthropological Essays (1861; New York: D. Appleton, 1899), pp.77156.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H.The Struggle for Existence in Human Society’, Nineteenth Century, 23 (February 1888), 6180.Google Scholar
, J. B., ‘Literary Vivisection’, Athenaeum, 1879 (October 1863), 571–3.Google Scholar
[Jeffrey, Francis], ‘Art. VIII. Thalaba, the Destroyer: A Metrical Romance. By Robert Southey’ [Review], Edinburgh Review, 1 (October 1802), 6383.Google Scholar
Jevons, William Stanley, ‘Cruelty to Animals: A Study in Sociology’, Fortnightly Review, 19.113 (1 May 1876), 671–84.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel, ‘No.17, Expedients of Idlers’, in The Works of Samuel Johnson, new ed., 12 vols. (1758; London, T. Longman et. al, 1992), VII, pp.64–7.Google Scholar
Joyce, James, Stephen Hero, ed. Spencer, T. (New York: New Directions, 1944).Google Scholar
[Julia, Aemelia], Leon de Beaumanoir (London: London & Hall, 1865).Google Scholar
[Lawrence, George Alfred], Guy Livingstone (New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1857).Google Scholar
Keen, W. W., Animal Experimentation and Medical Progress (New York and Boston: Boston Mifflin, 1914).Google Scholar
Le Bon, Gustave, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind (New York: Macmillan, 1896).Google Scholar
Lee, Elizabeth, Ouida: A Memoir (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1914).Google Scholar
Lee, Vernon, ‘Honour and Evolution’, in Baldwin: Being Dialogues in Views and Aspirations (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1886), pp.127–84.Google Scholar
Lee, Vernon, [Violet Paget], ‘Vivisection: An Evolutionist to Evolutionists’, Contemporary Review, 41 (May 1882), 788811.Google Scholar
Levy, H., ‘The Autobiography of H. G. Wells’ [Review], Supplement to “Nature”, 134.3397 (8 December 1934), 882–4.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H., ‘Dickens in Relation to Criticism’, Fortnightly Review, 17 (1872), 141–52.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H., ‘The Principles of Success in Literature’, Fortnightly Review, 1 (1865), 572–89.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H., Problems of Life and Mind: Study of Psychology Its Object, Scope, and Method (Boston: Houghton, 1879).Google Scholar
Lind-af-Hageby, L., August Strindberg: the Spirit of Revolt, Studies and Impressions (London: Stanley Paul & Co., 1913).Google Scholar
Lind-af-Hageby, L. and Schuartau, Leisa, The Shambles of Science: Extracts from the Diary of Two Students of Physiology (London: Ernest Bell, 1903).Google Scholar
Locke, H., ‘Letter to the Editor of the Stroud Journal’, Home Chronicler, 5.107 (6 July 1878), 11.Google Scholar
Lubbock, John, The Pleasures of Life (Philadelphia: Henry Altemus, 1894).Google Scholar
[Macaulay, Thomas Babington], ‘Mr Robert Montgomery: The Modern Practice of Puffing’, Edinburgh Review, 51 (April 1830), 193211.Google Scholar
Macauley, James, ‘Government Offices: The Civil Service Commission and Examination’, Leisure Hour: A Family Journal of Instruction and Recreation, 934 (20 November 1869), 747–9.Google Scholar
MacDonald, George, Paul Faber, Surgeon (London: Strahan, 1878).Google Scholar
Mackay, Charles, ‘Leon de Beaumanoir’ [Review], London Review of Politics, Society, Literature, Art, and Science, 11.272 (16 September 1865), 312–13.Google Scholar
Mantegazza, Paolo, Degli innesti animali e della produzione artificiale delle cellule (Milan: Amministrazione del Politecnico, 1865).Google Scholar
Mantegazza, Paolo, Fisiologia del dolore (Florence: Paggi, 1880).Google Scholar
Mantegazza, Paolo, L’Anno 3000. Sogno (Milano: Fratelli Treves, 1897).Google Scholar
Mantegazza, Paolo, The Year 3000, A Dream ed. Pireddu, Nicoletta, trans. Jacobson, David (Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Marey, Étienne-Jules, La méthode graphique dans les sciences expérimentales et principalement en physiologie et médecine (Paris: G. Masson, 1878).Google Scholar
Maron, Eugène, ‘Critique littéraire: Année 1847’, La Revue indépendante, 7 (25 January 1847), 242.Google Scholar
Marryat, Florence, An Angel of Pity (London: Hutchinson, 1898).Google Scholar
Marston, Ellis, of Chloe: A Tale of the Times (London: Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent & Co., 1900).Google Scholar
[Marzials, Frank T.], ‘George Eliot and Comtism’, London Quarterly Review, 47 (January 1877), 446–71.Google Scholar
McGrigor, J. Allan, ‘“Only a Cur!”’, Animal World, 15.173 (1 February 1884), 24.Google Scholar
Miller, Florence Fenwick, Lynton Abbott’s Children: A Novel, 3 vols. (London: Samuel Tinsley, 1879).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Peter Chalmers, ‘Mr Wells’s “Dr Moreau”’, The Saturday Review, 3.536 (11 April 1896), 368–69.Google Scholar
[Molière, ], The Misanthrope, Tartuffe, and Other Plays, trans. Slater, Maya (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
[Monomania, ], The Monomaniac of Love: A Study in the Pathology of Character, 2 vols. (London: Provost & Co., 1878).Google Scholar
Monro, Theodore Russell, ‘The Repression of Cruelty by Means of Humane Education’, Animals Guardian, 1.5 (February 1891), 51–2.Google Scholar
Morris, F. O., ‘The Cowardly Cruelty of the Experiments Upon Living Animals’ [Letter to the Editor], Zoophilist, 9.9 (1 January 1890), 204–5.Google Scholar
Morris, F. O., [Letter], Zoophilist, 9.10 (1 February 1890), 225.Google Scholar
Morris, F. O., ‘Sport and Slaughter’ [Letter to the Editor of The Times], Home Chronicler, 4.87 (16 February 1878), 100.Google Scholar
Morris, Lewis, ‘In a German Laboratory’, Zoophilist, 7.2 (1 June 1887), 27.Google Scholar
Morris, Lewis, ‘A Song of Two Worlds’, Zoophilist, 3.2 (2 February 1883), 83.Google Scholar
Morris, Lewis, ‘To the Tormentors’, in The Works of Sir Lewis Morris (London: Kegan Paul, 1898), 141–3Google Scholar
Mortimer, John, ‘George Eliot as a Novelist’, Papers of the Manchester Literary Club, 7 (24 January 1881), 116–28.Google Scholar
Müller, F. Max, Lectures on the Science of Language, Delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in April, May, and June, 1861, 3rd ed. (London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts, 1862).Google Scholar
, N., , E. P., ‘Shakespeare and the Animal World – II’, Animal World, 17.200 (1 May 1886) 66–7.Google Scholar
, N., , E. P., ‘Shakespeare and the Animal World – III’, Animal World, 17.201 (1 June 1886), 91.Google Scholar
, N., , E. P., ‘Shakespeare and the Animal World – V’, Animal World, 17.207 (1 December 1886), 179.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, A Genealogy of Morals, trans. Haussman, William A. & John Gray (London: Unwin, 1899).Google Scholar
Nightingale, Florence, Notes on Hospitals (London: John W. Parker and Son, 1859).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Notes on Nursing: What it is and what it is not (1859; London: Duckworth, 1970).Google Scholar
Nugent, C. E., ‘A Canary’s Appeal’, Animal World, 15.177 (2 June 1884), 91.Google Scholar
Orr, Alexandra, ‘Mr Browning’s Dramatic Idylls’, Contemporary Review, 35 (May 1879), 289302.Google Scholar
Ouida, , ‘The Future of Vivisection’, Gentleman’s Magazine, 252 (1882), 412–23.Google Scholar
Ouida, , The New Priesthood (London: E. W. Allen, 1893).Google Scholar
Ouida, , Puck: His Vicissitudes, Adventures, Observations, Conclusions, Friendships, and Philosophies Related by Himself and Edited by Ouida, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Bernhard Tauchnitz, 1870).Google Scholar
Ouida, , ‘Some Fallacies of Science’, North American Review, 142 (February 1886), 139–52.Google Scholar
Ouida, , Toxin: A Sketch (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1895).Google Scholar
Owen, John, ‘To My Cat, “Muff”’, Academy, 784 (14 May 1887), 342.Google Scholar
, P. L., ‘Turn and Turn About: A Story for Boys’, Animal World, 5.57 (1 June 1874), 88–9.Google Scholar
Paget, Walburga, ‘Vivisection and Aesthetics’, Abolitionist (15 May 1901), 13–15.Google Scholar
Pain, Barry, The Octave of Claudius (London: Harper, 1897).Google Scholar
Papillon, Fernand, ‘Physiology of the Passions’, Popular Science Monthly, (March 1874), 559.Google Scholar
Phelps, Elizabeth, Through Life Us Do Part (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1908).Google Scholar
Phillips, E. C., ‘Only a Mongrel: An Autobiography’, Animal World, 7.76 (1 January 1876), 35.Google Scholar
Phillpotts, Eden, ‘Bayliss v. Coleridge’ [Letter to the Editor], BMJ, 2.2239 (28 November 1903), 1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, Arthur, ‘The Pets of Authors’, Animal World, 16.185 (1 February 1885), 27–9.Google Scholar
Reade, Compton, Who was then the Gentleman? 3 vols. (London: John & Robert Maxwell, 1885).Google Scholar
Reade, R. H., ‘The Apostle of Russia’, Good Words, 33 (January 1892), 448–52.Google Scholar
Reed, Myrtle, A Spinner in the Sun (London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1906).Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. M. (ed.), The Nine Circles of Hell of the Innocents Described from the Report of the Presiding Spirits (London and New York: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1902).Google Scholar
Richet, Charles, Recherches expérimentales et cliniques sur la sensibilité (Paris: G. Masson, 1877).Google Scholar
Roberts, Harry, ‘Public Control of Hospitals: The Problem Stated’, in Humanitarian Essays Being Volume III of ‘Cruelties of Civilisation’, ed. Salt, Henry (London: William Reeves, 1897), pp.324.Google Scholar
Roberts, Louisa, ‘A Nursery Rhyme for Grown-Up Children (It Might Frighten the Little Ones!)’, Animal World, 6.67 (1 April 1875), 59.Google Scholar
[Roscoe, William Caldwell], ‘Miss Bronte’, National Review 5.9 (July 1857), 127–64.Google Scholar
Rossetti, Christina, ‘A Poor Old Dog’ [‘Word for the Dumb’], in, New Poems, Hitherto Unpublished or Uncollected, ed. Rossetti, William Michael (London: Macmillan & Co., 1896).Google Scholar
Rowe, C. E., ‘Vivisection’, Zoophilist, 7.8 (1 December 1887), 128.Google Scholar
, S., , H. S., ‘The Poet as Philosopher and Peer’, To-day, 2 (February 1884), 135–47.Google Scholar
, S., Escott, T. H., ‘A Historian of the Day’, The Times, 1 (June 1879), 379–84.Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, Charles AugustinMadame Bovary, par M. Gustave Flaubert’, Le Moniteur Universel, 4 May 1857.Google Scholar
Salt, Henry, Animal Rights Considered in Relation to Human Progress (New York: Macmillan, 1894).Google Scholar
Salt, Henry, ‘Sentiment’, Humanitarian, (October 1905), 172–3.Google Scholar
Salt, Henry, Story of My Cousins: Brief Animal Biographies (London: Watts, 1923).Google Scholar
Savage, George, ‘A Working Man on Vivisection: Vivisection – What Is It? A Popular Dialogue between Two Working Men’, Home Chronicler, 49 (26 May 1877), 744–5.Google Scholar
Sewell, Anna, Black Beauty: His Grooms and Companions, the Autobiography of a Horse (London: Jarrold and Sons, 1877).Google Scholar
Shadwell, Thomas, The Virtuoso, ed. Hope, Marjorie and Stuart Rhodes, David (London: Edward Arnold, 1966).Google Scholar
Sharp, T., ‘A Plea and a Protest’, Animal World, 15.178 (1 July 1884), 107.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. B., ‘Preface on Doctors’, The Doctor’s Dilemma (London: Penguin, 1987), pp.988.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. B., ‘These Scoundrels: Vivisection – the “Science” of Imbeciles: Boiling Babies for the Sake of Knowledge: St Thomas, “the Half-wit,” and the Risen Christ’, Sunday Express, (7 August 1927), 7.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Amos, ‘Mr Tennyson’s New Poems’, Westminster Review, 26.2 (October 1864), 396414.Google Scholar
Simon, John, ‘An Address Delivered at the Opening of the Section of Public Medicine’, BMJ (6 August 1881), 219–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoad, Warner, ‘Vivisection’, Zoophilist, 10.3 (1 July 1890), 57.Google Scholar
Spence, Joseph, Anecdotes, Observations, and Characters, 2nd ed. (London: J. R. Smith, 1858).Google Scholar
Statham, W. M., ‘Private and Confidential. Sarcasm’, Quiver, 12.577 (January 1877), 310–12.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames, ‘Sentimentalism’, Cornhill Magazine, 10 (July 1864), 6575.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Robert Louis, Memories and Portraits (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887).Google Scholar
Strindberg, August, The Cloister, ed. Bjurström, C. B. and trans. Sandbach, Mary (London: Secker & Walburg, 1969).Google Scholar
Strindberg, August, ‘On Modern Drama and Modern Theatre’, in Selected Essays by August Strindberg, ed. and trans. Robinson, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp.7386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strindberg, August, ‘Preface to Miss Julie’, in Strindberg on Drama and Theatre, ed. and trans. Törnqvist, Egil and Steene, Birgitta (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007), pp.6272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strindberg, August, Strindberg’s Letters, ed. and trans. Robinson, Michael, 2 vols. (London: The Athlone Press, 1992), I.Google Scholar
Suckling, F. H., ‘Practical Lessons in Humanity for Children’, Animals Guardian, 1.2 (November 1890), 1718.Google Scholar
Swan, Michael, ‘Critic on the Hearth. The Spoken Word: Choice of Voice’, Listener, 57.1462 (4 April 1957), 575.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Algernon C., A Study of Shakespeare (London: Chatto & Windus, 1880).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Algernon C., ‘Wilkie Collins’, Fortnightly Review, 46.275 (1 November 1889), 589–99.Google Scholar
Symington, Andrew James, ‘Charles [Tennyson] Turner’s Sonnets’, Animal World, 6.68 (1 May 1875), 70–1.Google Scholar
Tennyson, Alfred, In Memoriam, ed. Rolfe, William J. (New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1896), CXIV.Google Scholar
Tennyson, Alfred, ‘In the Children’s Hospital’, Anti-Vivisectionist, 7.205 (15 December 1880), 516–17.Google Scholar
Tennyson, Alfred, ‘In the Children’s Hospital’, Zoophilist, 9.8 (2 December 1889), 169–76.Google Scholar
Tennyson, Alfred, The Princess: A Medley (London: Edward Moxon, 1847).Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony, ‘Critical Notice’, Fortnightly Review, 4.22 (1 April 1866), 510–12.Google Scholar
Trollope, Frances Eleanor, ‘The Homes and Haunts of the Italian Poets’, Belgravia, 32.127 (May 1877), 287309.Google Scholar
Von Hacht, Bertha, ‘The Dogs of Fiction’, Animal World, 18.214 (1 July 1887), 102–4.Google Scholar
, W., , E. A., ‘Homer and the Animal World’, Animal World, 6.70 (1 July 1875), 105–6.Google Scholar
Warbasse, James Peter, The Conquest of Disease through Animal Experimentation (London: Appleton & Co., 1910).Google Scholar
Watson, Thomas, ‘Vivisection’, Contemporary Review, 25 (13 May 1875), 867–70.Google Scholar
Weeden, Linda, ‘The Poet and the Vivisector’ (Enfield: EDAVL, [n.d.]).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘Ancient Experiments in Co-operation’, in H. G. Wells: Early Writings in Science and Science Fiction, ed. Philmus, Robert M. and Hughes, David (1892; Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975), pp.187–93.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., Early Writings in Science and Science Fiction, ed. Philmus, Robert and Hughes, David (Berkley: University of California Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., Experiment in Autobiography: Discoveries and Conclusions of a Very Ordinary Brain (Since 1866) (New York: J. B. Lippincott, 1967).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., First and Last Things: A Confession and Rule of Life (New York: J. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1908).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘Human Evolution, an Artificial Process’, Fortnightly Review, 60 (October 1896), 590–5.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., In the Days of the Comet (London: Macmillan, 1906).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., The Island of Doctor Moreau, ed. Harris, Mason (Peterborough: Broadview, 2009).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., The Island of Doctor Moreau, ed. Parrinder, Patrick (London: Penguin, 2005).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., The Island of Doctor Moreau (New York: Stone & Kimball, 1896).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., The Invisible Man, ed. Parrinder, Patrick (London: Penguin, 2005).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., [Letter to the Editor], Saturday Review (1 November 1896), 479.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘The Limits of Individual Plasticity’, Saturday Review, 79 (19 January 1895), 8990.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘The Man of Science and the Expressive Man. To Whom does the Future Belong? Some thoughts about Ivan Pavlov and George Bernard Shaw’, in The Way the World is Going: Guesses and Forecasts of the Years Ahead (London: Ernest Benn Ltd., 1928), pp.271–81.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘Morals and Civilisation’, Fortnightly Review, 61 (February 1897), 263–8.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., The Outline of History: Being a Plain History of Life and Mankind, 2 vols. (London: Newnes, 1919), II.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘Popular Feeling and the Advancement of Science: Anti-Vivisection’, in The Way the World is Going: Guesses and Forecasts of the Years Ahead (London: Ernest Benn Ltd., 1928), 221–30.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘Preface’, The Scientific Romances of H. G. Wells (London: Gollancz, 1933), pp.vii–x.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘The Problem of the Birth Supply’, Mankind in the Making, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Bernard Tauchnitz, 1903), I, 5198.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘The Province of Pain’, in Early Writings in Science and Science Fiction ed. Philmus, Robert and Hughes, David (1894; Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975), 194–9.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘Science, in School and after School’, Nature, 50 (27 September 1894), 525–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, H. G., The Science of Life, 2 vols. (New York: Doubleday, 1931).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., Textbook of Biology, 2 vols. (London: W. B. Clive & Co., University Correspondence College Press, 1892), I.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., ‘Under the Knife’, in The Country of the Blind and Other Stories (London: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1911), pp.161–78.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., The Wonderful Visit (London: J. M. Dent & Co., 1895).Google Scholar
Wilcox, Ella Wheeler, ‘Poem’, Anti-Vivisectionist Review, (August 1909), 56.Google Scholar
Wilks, Samuel, ‘Tennyson’s Poem “In the Children’s Hospital”’ [Letter to the Editor], BMJ (7 March 1903), 576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Basil, [Review of The Island of Doctor Moreau], Athenaeum (9 May 1896), 615–16.Google Scholar
Zola, Émile, ‘The Experimental Novel’, in The Experimental Novel and other Essays, trans. Sherman, Belle M. (New York: Cassell Publishing, 1893), 154.Google Scholar
Zola, Émile, La Joie de vivre [1883], Les Rougon-Macquart: Histoire naturelle et sociale d’une famille sous le second empire, ed. Lanoux, Armand and Mitterland, Henri, 5 vols. (Paris: Gallimard, 1960-67), III.Google Scholar
Zola, Émile, ‘Le Naturalisme au théâtre’, in Le Roman expérimental (Paris: Charpentier, 1880), pp.109–56.Google Scholar
Zola, Émile, ‘Naturalism on the Stage’, in The Experimental Novel and other Essays, trans. Sherman, Belle M. (New York: Cassell Publishing, 1893), pp.109–57.Google Scholar
Zola, Émile, ‘Le Roman expérimental’, in Le Roman expérimental (Paris: Charpentier, 1880), pp.153.Google Scholar
Zola, Émile, Thérèse Raquin (Paris: A. Lacroix, Verboeckhoven & Co., 1868).Google Scholar
Zola, Émile, Thérèse Raquin: A Realistic Novel (London: Viztelly & Co., 1887).Google Scholar
Aaltola, Elisa, Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abberley, Will, Mimicry and Display in Victorian Literary Culture: Nature, Science and the Nineteenth-Century Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, William M., ‘The British Catholic Debate Over Vivisection, 1876–1914: A Common Theology but Differing Applications’, British Catholic History, 34.3 (2019), 451–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ablow, Rachel, Victorian Pain (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Abse, Joan, John Ruskin, The Passionate Moralist (London: Quartet Books, 1982).Google Scholar
Adams, Carol and Donovan, Josephine (eds.), Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., Aesthetic Theory, trans. Kentor, Robert Hullot, ed. Adorno, Gretel and Tiedemann, Rolf (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Agruss, David, ‘Victorian Experimental Physiology and the Empire of Bodily Interiors: Vivisection, Sexuality, Imperialism’, Prose Studies, 35.3 (2013), 263–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Emily, Theater Figures: The Production of the Nineteenth-century British Novel (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Alter, Stephen, William Dwight Whitney and the Science of Language (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Anderson, Katherine, Twisted Words: Torture and Liberalism in Imperial Britain (Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anger, Suzy, Victorian Interpretation (London and New York: Cornell University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Arata, Stephen, ‘The fin de siècle’, in The Cambridge History of Victorian Literature, ed. Flint, Kate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp.124–47.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Phillip, ‘Shakespeare’s Animal Parts’, in Reading Literary Animals, Medieval to Modern, ed. Edwards, Karen L., Ryan, Derek and Spencer, Jane (London: Routledge, 2020), pp.6987.Google Scholar
Ashton, Rosemary, G. H. Lewes, A Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Baguley, David (ed.), ‘Introduction: Zola and His Critics’, in Critical Essays on Emile Zola (Boston: G. K. Hall & Co., 1986), pp.124.Google Scholar
Baguley, David Naturalist Fiction: The Entropic Vision (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Andrew, Mad Scientist, Impossible Human: An Essay in Generative Anthropology (Aurora, Colorado: The Davies Group, 2014).Google Scholar
Bates, A. W. H., Anti-Vivisection and the Profession of Medicine in Britain, A Social History (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, A. W. H., ‘Boycotted Hospital: The National Anti-Vivisection Hospital, London, 1903–1935’, Journal of Animal Ethics, 6.2 (2016), 177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, A. W. H., ‘Vivisection, Virtue Ethics, and the Law in 19th Century Britain’, Journal of Animal Ethics, 4.2 (2014), 3044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, George Joseph (ed.), Documents of Modern Literary Realism (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Gillian, Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot, and Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, Marc, The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow, and Empathy – and Why They Matter (Novato: The New World Library, 2007).Google Scholar
Bender, John, ‘Novel Knowledge: Judgement, Experience, Experiment’, in This is Enlightenment, ed. Siskin, Clifford and Warner, William (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010), pp.284300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bending, Lucy, The Representations of Bodily Pain in Late Nineteenth-Century English Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergonzi, Bernard, The Early H. G. Wells: A Study of the Scientific Romances (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico, ‘Early Modern Experimentation on Live Animals’, Journal of the History of Biology, 46.2 (2012), 199226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertomeu-Sánchez, José Ramón, ‘Classrooms, Salons, Academies, and Courts: Mateu Orfila (1787-1853) and Nineteenth-Century French Toxicology’, Ambix, 61.2 (2014), 162–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biro, David, ‘Psychological Pain: Metaphor or Reality’, in Pain and Emotion in Modern History, ed. Boddice, Rob (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp.5365.Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, Humane Professions: The Defence of Experimental Medicine, 1876-1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘Introduction: Hurt Feelings?’, in Pain and Emotion in Modern History, ed. Boddice, Rob (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), pp.115.Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob, The Science of Sympathy: Morality, Evolution, and Victorian Civilisation (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddice, Rob, ‘“Vivisecting Major”: A Victorian Gentleman Scientist Defends Animal Experimentation, 1876–1885’, Isis, 102 (2011), 215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borzelleca, Joseph F., ‘Profiles in Toxicology: Paracelsus: Herald of Modern Toxicology’, Toxicological Sciences, 53 (2000), 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, Joanna, ‘Pain Sensitivity: An Unnatural History from 1800 to 1965’, Journal of Medical Humanities, 35 (2014), 301–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourke, Joanna, The Story of Pain: From Prayer to Painkillers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Bozzetto, Roger, ‘Moreau’s Tragi-Farcical Island’, Science-Fiction Studies, 20 (1993), 3444.Google Scholar
Brilmyer, S. Pearl, The Science of Character: Human Objecthood and the Ends of Victorian Realism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumley, Mark, ‘Declamation and Dismemberment: Rhetoric, the Body, and Disarticulation in Four Victorian Horror Novels’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of North Carolina (2015).Google Scholar
Buettinger, Craig, ‘Antivivisection and the Charge of Zoophil-Psychosis in the Early Twentieth Century’, The Historian, 55 (1993), 857–72.Google Scholar
Burghardt, Gordon, ‘The Sun Always Rises: Scientists also Need Semantics’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 31 (2008), 133–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Harry G., Out of Inferno: Strindberg’s Reawakening as an Artist (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Catlett, Stephen, ‘Huxley, Hutton and the “White Rage”: A Debate on Vivisection at the Metaphysical Society’, Archives of Natural History, 11 (1983), 181–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, Timothy, ‘The “Bestial Mark” of Race in “The Island of Doctor Moreau”’, Criticism, 46.4 (2004), 575–95.Google Scholar
Cole, Thomas G. II, ‘The Production of Medicoethical Misconduct: Medical Ethics and Vivisection in Wilkie Collins’s Heart and Science’, Med Humanities, 49 (2023), 289–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conti, Fiorenzo, and Conti, Silvana Irrera, ‘On Science and Literature: A Lesson from the Bernard-Zola Case’, BioScience, 53.9 (2003), 865–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, R. S., ‘Suggestions toward a Genealogy of the “Man of Feeling”’, English Literary History, 6 (1934), 205–30.Google Scholar
Cronin, J. Keri, Art for Animals: Visual Culture and Animal Advocacy, 1870–1914 (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew, The Anatomist Anatomis’d: An Experimental Discipline in Enlightenment Europe (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010).Google Scholar
Daly, Macdonald, ‘Vivisection in Eighteenth-Century Britain’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 12 (1989), 5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dames, Nicholas, The Physiology of the Novel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danta, Chris, Animal Fables after Darwin: Literature, Speciesism, and Metaphor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danta, Chris, ‘The Metaphysical Cut: Darwin and Stevenson on Vivisection’, Victorian Review, 36.2 (2010), 5186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter, ‘The Image of Objectivity’, Representations, 40 (1992), 81128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depledge, Greta, ‘Experimental Medicine, Marital Harmony, and Florence Marryat’s An Angel of Pity’, Women’s Writing, 20.2 (2013), 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, Anne, Moral Authority, Men of Science, and the Victorian Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, Diana, Picturing Animals in Britain, 1750-1850 (Yale: Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Donald, Diana, Women Against Cruelty: Protection of Animals in Nineteenth-Century Britain (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dror, Otniel E., ‘The Affect of Experiment: The Turn to Emotions in Anglo-American Physiology, 1900–1940’, Isis, 90.2 (1999), 205–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dror, Otniel E., ‘The Scientific Image of Emotion: Experience and Technologies of Inscription’, Configurations, 7.3 (1999), 355401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebury, Katherine, ‘Vivisection in Modernist Culture and Popular Fiction, 1890–1945’, in The Palgrave Handbook of Animals and Literature, ed. McHugh, Susan, McKay, Robert, and Miller, John (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021), pp.397409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Karen L., Ryan, Derek, and Spencer, Jane, ‘Introduction’, in Reading Literary Animals, Medieval to Modern, ed. Edwards, Karen L., Ryan, Derek and Spencer, Jane (London: Routledge, 2020), pp.110.Google Scholar
Eichberg, Stephanie, ‘“No Brain, No Pain?” The Emergence of Animal “Pseudo-Pain” in Nineteenth-Century Research on Reflex Action’, in Who’s Talking Now?: Multispecies Relations from a Human and Animals’ Points of View, ed. Blanco, Chiara and Deering, Bel (Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press, 2015), pp.121–30.Google Scholar
Eigner, Edwin M., and George, J. Worth, , ‘Introductory Essay’, in Victorian Criticism of the Novel. ed. Eigner, Edwin M. and Worth, George J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp.119.Google Scholar
Elce, Erika Behrisch, ‘“One Remarkable Evening”: Redemptive Science in Wilkie Collins’s Heart and Science’, Journal of Literature and Science, 7.1 (2014), 4154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmail, Jennifer, Reading Deafness: Science and Sounds in Victorian Literature and Culture (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Evans, Joan, ‘Men Nurses: A Historical and Feminist Perspective’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47.3 (2004), 321–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairclough, Mary, ‘The Sympathy of Popular Opinion: Representations of the Crowd in Britain, 1770-1849’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of York (2008).Google Scholar
Farmer, Steve, ‘Introduction’, in Collins, Wilkie, Heart and Science, ed. Farmer, Steve (London: Broadview, 1996), pp.727.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Christine, The Brutal Tongue: Language, Science and Popular Fiction in the Victorian Fin-de-Siècle (New York: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Suzanne C., ‘Mme. Laure and Operative Irony in Middlemarch: A Structural Analogy’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 3.4 (1963), 509–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuerstein, Anna, The Political Lives of Victorian Animals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, Michael A., and Stark, James F., ‘Medical Science and the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876: A Re-examination of Anti-vivisectionism in Provincial Britain’, Elsevier, 49 (2015), 1223.Google ScholarPubMed
Finn, Michael R., ‘Dogs and Females: Vivisection, Feminists and the Novelist Rachilde’, French Cultural Studies, 23.3 (2012), 190201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fissell, Mary, ‘The Disappearance of the Patient’s Narrative and the Invention of Hospital Medicine’, in British Medicine in an Age of Reform ed. French, Roger and Wear, Andrew (London: Routledge, 1991), pp.92109.Google Scholar
Flegel, Monica, ‘“I Declare I Never Saw to Lovely an Animal!”: Beauty, Individuality, and Objectification in Nineteenth-Century Animal Autobiographies’, in Animals in Victorian Literature and Culture: Contexts for Criticism, ed. Mazzeno, Laurence W. and Morrison, Ronald D. (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp.147–66.Google Scholar
Fleissner, Robert F., ‘H. G. Wells and Ralph Ellison: Need the Effect of One Invisible Man on Another Be Itself Invisible?’, Extrapolation, 33.4 (1992), 346–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, Kate, ‘Blood, Bodies, and The Lifted Veil’, Nineteenth-Century Literature, 51.4 (1997), 455–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Edward K., The Brown Dog and His Memorial (London: Anti-Vivisection Council, 1908).Google Scholar
Frankel, Oz, States of Inquiry: Social Investigations and Print Culture in Nineteenth-Century Britain and the United States (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Hilary, ‘Periodicals and Reviewing’, in The Cambridge History of Victorian Literature, ed. Flint, Kate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp.5676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Richard, Antivivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Friedland, Gerald, ‘Discovery of the Function of the Heart and Circulation of the Blood’, Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 20.3 (2009), 160.Google Scholar
Furst, Lilian R. and Skrine, Peter N., Naturalism (New York: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Garbarino, Carla and Mazzarello, Paolo, ‘A Strange Horn between Paolo Mantegazza and Charles Darwin’, Endeavour, 37.3 (2013), 184–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, Stanton B. Jr., ‘Physiologies of the Modern: Zola, Experimental Medicine, and the Naturalist Stage’, Modern Drama 43.4 (2000), 529–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garratt, Peter, ‘Scientific Literary Criticism’, in The Routledge Research Companion to Nineteenth-Century British Literature and Science, ed. Holmes, John and Ruston, Sharon (London: Routledge, 2017), pp.115–27.Google Scholar
Geibel, James Wayne, ‘An Annotated Bibliography of British Criticism of George Eliot, 1858–1900’, unpublished PhD thesis, Ohio State University (1969).Google Scholar
Gilbert, Pamela K., Disease, Desire, and the Body in Victorian Women’s Popular Novels (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Pamela K., Victorian Skin: Surface, Self, History (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmour, Michael J., ‘William Bartram (1739–1823): A Quaker-Inspired Animal Advocacy’ in Animal Theologians, ed. Linzey, Andrew and Linzey, Clair (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023), pp.124–34.Google Scholar
Glaholt, Hayley Rose, ‘Vivisection as War: The “Moral Diseases” of Animal Experimentation and Slavery in British Victorian Quaker Pacifist Ethics’, Society and Animals20 (2012), 154–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Jane, ‘Flush: A Biography: Speaking, Reading, and Writing with the Companion Species’, in A Companion to Virginia Woolf, ed. Berman, Jessica (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016), pp.163–75.Google Scholar
Gooday, Graeme, ‘Placing or Replacing the Laboratory in the History of Science?’, Isis, 99.4 (2008), 783–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Adam, ‘Dog Story: How Did the Dog Become Our Master’, New Yorker (8 August 2011) www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/08/08/dog-story-adam-gopnik.Google Scholar
Götselius, Thomas, ‘Helvetet lössläppt: Strindberg skriver’, in Strindbergs förvandlingar, ed. Adolfsson, Eva and Olsson, Ulf (Stockholm: Symposion, 1999), pp.95136.Google Scholar
Gould, Deborah, ‘Affect and Protest’, in Political Emotions: New Agendas in Communication, ed. Staiger, Janet, Cvetkovich, Ann and Reynolds, Anne (New York: Routledge, 2010), pp.1844.Google Scholar
Gravier, Maurice, ‘Strindberg and the French Drama of his Time’, in Strindberg’s Dramaturgy, ed. Stockenström, Göran (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988), pp.141–51.Google Scholar
Gray, Beryl, The Dog in the Dickensian Imagination (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Gray, Beryl, ‘The Lifted Veil’ in Oxford Reader’s Companion to George Eliot, ed. Rignall, John (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp.231–2.Google Scholar
Gray, Liz, ‘Body, Mind and Madness: Pain in Animals in Nineteenth-Century Comparative Psychology’, in Pain and Emotion in Modern History ed. Boddice, Rob (New York: Palgrave Macmillan: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp.148–63Google Scholar
Griffiths, Devin, The Age of Analogy: Science and Literature between the Darwins (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Guarnieri, Patrizia, ‘Moritz Schiff (1823–96): Experimental Physiology and Noble Sentiment in Florence’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas (London: Routledge, 1987), pp.105–24.Google Scholar
Guerrini, Anita, ‘Experiments, Causation and the Uses of Vivisection in the First Half of the Seventeenth Century’, Journal of the History of Biology, 46.2 (2012), 227–54.Google Scholar
Guerrini, Anita, Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Animal Rights (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Guy, Josephine M., and Small, Ian, ‘The British “Man of Letters” and the Rise of the Professional’, in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Volume VII, Modernism and the New Criticism, ed. Walton Litz, A., Menand, Louis, and Rainey, Lawrence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp.377–88.Google Scholar
Habib, M. A. R. (ed.), ‘Introduction’, in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, 9 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), VI, pp.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Susan (ed.), Animal Welfare & Anti-Vivisection 1870–1910: Nineteenth-Century Woman’s Mission, 3 vols. (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Hamilton, SusanCritique of Science in the Victorian Anti-Vivisection Press: Frances Power Cobbe’s Writing for the Victoria Street Society’, Victorian Review, 36.2 (2010), 6679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Susan ‘“Still Lives”: Gender and the Literature of the Victorian Vivisection Controversy’, Victorian Review, 17.2 (1991), 2132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Susan ‘“[T]o Bind Together in Mutual Helpfulness”: Genre and/as Social Action in the Victorian Anti-Vivisection Press’, Journal of Modern Periodical Studies, 6.2 (2015), 134–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handcock, Tarryn, ‘Revelation and the Unseen in H. G. Wells’s The Invisible Man’, Colloquy: Text, Theory, Critique, 25 (2013), 4057.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna, Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
Harris, Mason, ‘Introduction’, in Wells, H. G., The Island of Doctor Moreau, ed. Harris, Mason (Peterborough: Broadview, 2009), pp.1358.Google Scholar
Hartley, Lucy, Physiognomy and the Meaning of Expression in Nineteenth-Century Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Hemmings, F. W. J., ‘The Present Position in Zola Studies’, in The Present State of French Studies: A Collection of Research Review, ed. Osburn, Charles B. (Metuchen: The Scarecrow Press, 1971), pp.586623.Google Scholar
Herman, David, ‘Animal Autobiography; Or, Narration Beyond the Human’, Humanities, 5.82 (2016), 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, David, ‘Storyworld/Umwelt: Nonhuman Experiences in Graphic Narratives’, SubStance, 40.1 (2011), 156–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesketh, Ian, The Science of History in Victorian Britain: Making the Past Speak (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 2016).Google Scholar
Heymans, Peter, Animality in British Romanticism: The Aesthetics of Species (London: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkiss, A. D., ‘Chronic Pain in Nineteenth-Century British Medical Writings’, History of Psychiatry, 2 (1991), 2740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, Frederick, Claude Bernard and Animal Chemistry (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Tarquin, ‘Science, Sensitivity and the Sociozoological Scale: Constituting and Complicating the Human-Animal Boundary at the 1875 Royal Commission on Vivisection and beyond’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 90 (2021), 194207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holzapfel, Amy Strahler, ‘Strindberg as Vivisector: Physiology, Pathology, and Anti-Mimesis in The Father and Miss Julie’, Modern Drama, 51.3 (2008), 329–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopley, Emma, Campaigning Against Cruelty: The Hundred Year History of the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (London: BUAV, 1998).Google Scholar
Houghton, Walter, ‘Periodical Literature and the Articulate Classes’, in The Victorian Periodical Press: Samplings and Soundings, ed. Shattock, Joanne and Wolff, Michael (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1982), pp.327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Irving, ‘Zola: The Poetry of Naturalism’, in Critical Essays on Emile Zola, ed. Baguley, David (Boston: G. K. Hall & Co., 1986), pp.111–23.Google Scholar
Howell, Phillip, At Home and Astray: The Domestic Dog in Victorian Britain (Virginia: University of Virginia Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Huff, Cynthia, and Haefner, Joel, ‘The Master’s Voice: Animalographies, Life Writing and the Posthuman’, Biography, 35.1 (2012), 153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Kimberley, ‘Vivisected Language in H. G. Wells’s The Island of Doctor Moreau’, Wellsian, 29 (2006), 1934.Google Scholar
James, Simon, Maps of Utopia: H. G. Wells Modernity, and the End of Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas, ‘The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine as Rhetorical and Aesthetic Accomplishment’, in The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine, ed. Cunningham, Andrew and Williams, Percy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp.304–23.Google Scholar
Jasper, James M., ‘The Emotions of Protest: Affective and Reactive Emotions in and Around Social Movements’, Sociological Forum, 13.3 (1998), 397424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewson, N. D., ‘The Disappearance of the Sick Man from Medical Cosmology, 1770–1870’, Sociology, 10.2 (1976), 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Linda M., ‘John Ruskin (1819–1900): “Beholding Birds” – A Visual Case against Vivisection’, in Animal Theologians, ed. Linzey, Andrew and Linzey, Clair (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023), pp.153–72.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred, Sacred Tears: Sentimentality in Victorian Literature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Kean, Hilda, Animal Rights: Political and Social Change in Britain since 1800 (London: Reaktion Books, 1988).Google Scholar
Kean, Hilda, ‘An Exploration of the Sculptures of Greyfriars Bobby, Edinburgh, Scotland, and the Brown Dog, Battersea, South London, England’, Society and Animals Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 11.4 (2003), 353–73.Google Scholar
Kean, Hilda, ‘“The Smooth Cool Men of Science”: The Feminist and Socialist Response to Vivisection’, History Workshop Journal, 40 (1995), 1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennaway, James, ‘Musical Hypnosis: Sound and Selfhood from Mesmerism to Brainwashing’, Social History of Medicine, 25.2 (2011), 271–89.Google Scholar
Kent, Christopher, ‘Introduction’, in British Literary Magazines: The Victorian and Edwardian Age, 1837–1913, ed. Sullivan, Alvin (London: Greenwood Press, 1984), pp.xiiixxvi.Google Scholar
Kenyon-Jones, Christine, Kindred Brutes: Animals in Romantic-Period Writing (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001).Google Scholar
Kete, Kathleen, The Beast in the Boudoir: Petkeeping in Nineteenth-Century Paris (Berkley: University of California Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kichigina, Galina, The Imperial Laboratory: Experimental Physiology and Clinical Medicine in Post-Crimean Russia (New York: Rodopi, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingstone, Helen, Victorian Narratives of the Recent Past: Memory, History, Fiction (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korte, Barbara, ‘The Semantics of Physical Pain in Science Fiction’, English Studies, 90.3 (2009), 294304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreilkamp, Ivan, ‘Petted Things: Wuthering Heights and the Animal’, Yale Journal of Criticism, 18.1 (2005), 87110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreisel, Deanna K., ‘Incognito, Intervention, and Dismemberment in Adam Bede’, English Literary History, 70 (2003), 541–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansbury, Coral, ‘Gynaecology, Pornography, and the Antivivisection Movement’, Victorian Studies, 28.3 (1985), 413–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Lansbury, Coral, The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers and Vivisection in Victorian and Edwardian England (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, We Have Never Been Modern, trans. Porter, Catherine (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Levine, George, ‘One Culture: Science and Literature’, in One Culture: Essays in Science and Literature, ed. Levine, George (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987), pp.334.Google Scholar
Levine, George, The Realistic Imagination: English Fiction from Frankenstein to Lady Chatterley (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Levitt, Gail, ‘Anti-Vivisection Writing 1875–1910 and its Cultural Context’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Exeter (2003).Google Scholar
Li, Chien-hui, ‘Mobilizing Christianity in the Antivivisection Movement in Victorian Britain’, Journal of Animal Ethics, 2.2 (2012), 141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Chien-hui, Mobilizing Traditions in the First Wave of the British Animal Defense Movement (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lide, Barbara, ‘Strindberg and Molière – Parallels, Influence, Image’, in Molière and the Commonwealth of Letters: Patrimony and Posterity, ed. Johnson, Roger Jr., Neumann, Edith S., and Trail, Guy T (Jackson: University of Mississippi Press, 1975), pp.259–68.Google Scholar
Lindström, Hans, Textkritisk kommentar till August Strindbergs Samlade Verk del 29 (Stockholm: Stockholm University, 2020).Google Scholar
Logan, Louise, ‘Drawing Species Lines: Sensation and Empathy in Illustrations of Vivisection in the Illustrated Police News’, Victorian Periodical Review, 53.1 (2020), 1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveridge, Ann, ‘Historical, Fictional, and Illustrative Readings of the Vivisected Body 1873–1913’, unpublished PhD thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University (2017).Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael, ‘Sacrifice and the Transformation of the Animal Body into a Scientific Object: Laboratory Culture and Ritual Practice in the Neurosciences’, Social Studies of Science, 18.2 (1988), 265–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, Dan, The Politics of Animal Experimentation (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEachen, Dougald B., ‘Wilkie Collins’ Heart and Science and the Vivisection Controversy’, The Victorian Newsletter, 29 (1966), 22–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Mackerness, E. D., ‘Nathan Benjulia, a Prototype of Dr Moreau?’, Wellsian, 2 (1978), 15.Google Scholar
MacLean, Steven, The Early Fiction of H. G Wells: Fantasies of Science (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Maehle, Andreas-Holger and Tröhler, Ulrich, ‘Animal Experimentation from Antiquity to the End of the Eighteenth Century’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas (London: Routledge, 1987), pp.1447.Google Scholar
Maehle, Andreas-Holger and Tröhler, Ulrich, ‘Literary Responses to Animal Experimentation in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Britain’, Medical History, 34 (1990), 2751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, Jan, Christina Rossetti: A Literary Biography (London: Faber and Faber, 2012).Google Scholar
Marvin, Gary and McHugh, Susan, ‘In It Together: An Introduction to Human–Animal Studies’, in The Routledge Handbook of Human–Animal Studies, ed. Marvin, Garry and McHugh, Susan (New York: Routledge, 2014), pp.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Emma, Christina Rossetti: Poetry, Ecology, Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Peter, The Brown Dog Affair: The Story of a Monument that Divided a Nation (London: Two Sevens Publishing, 1977).Google Scholar
Matlock, Jann, ‘Censoring the Realist Gaze’, in Spectacles of Realism: Body, Gender, Genre, ed. Cohen, Margaret and Prendergast, Christopher (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1995) pp.2865.Google Scholar
Maurer, Oscar, ‘Anonymity vs Signature in Victorian Reviewing’, Texas Studies in English, 27 (1948), 128.Google Scholar
Mayer, Jed, ‘The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Laboratory Animals’, Victorian Studies, 50.3 (2008), 339417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, Jed, ‘Ruskin, Vivisection, and Scientific Knowledge’, Nineteenth Century Prose, 35.1 (2008), 200–22.Google Scholar
Mayer, Jed, ‘The Vivisection of the Snark’, Victorian Poetry, 47.2 (209), 429–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Jed, ‘Ways of Reading Animals in Victorian Literature Culture and Science’, Literature Compass, 7.5 (2010), 347–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzeno, Laurence W. and Morrison, Ronald D. (ed.), ‘Introduction’, in Animals in Victorian Literature and Culture: Contexts for Criticism (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp.120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, Elizabeth, ‘The Ethics of Materiality: Sensation, Pain and Sympathy in Victorian Literature’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Maryland (2007).Google Scholar
McLaughlen, Robbie, Re-imagining the ‘Dark Continent’ in Fin de Siècle Literature, (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchiori, Barbara Arnett, Grant Allen: The Downward Path which Leads to Fiction (Rome: Bulzoni Editore, 2000).Google Scholar
Menke, Richard, ‘Fiction as Vivisection’, English Literary History, 67.2 (2000), 617–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midgley, Mary, Animals and Why They Matter (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Milburn, Colin, ‘Science from Hell: Jack the Ripper and Victorian Vivisection’, in Science Images and Popular Images of the Sciences, ed. Weingard, Peter and Hüppauf, Bernd (New York: Routledge, 2008), pp.125–58.Google Scholar
Miller, Ian, ‘Necessary Torture? Vivisection, Suffragette Force-Feeding, and Responses to Scientific Medicine in Britain, 1870-1920’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 64.3 (2009), 333–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, Robert, Experimental Life: Vitalism in Science and Literature (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Sally, Frances Power Cobbe: Victorian Feminist, Journalist, Reformer (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Moore, Gregory, ‘Literary Criticism and Models of Science’, in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. Habib, M. A. R., 9 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), VI, pp.565–87.Google Scholar
Morehead, Alison, ‘Hands, Dissection and Embodied Seeing: Strindberg and Munch’, in August Strindberg and Visual Culture: The Emergence of Optical Modernity in Image, Text, and Theatre, ed. Schroeder, Jonathan, Stenport, Anna Westerstahl, and Szalczer, Eszter (New York: Bloomsbury, 2019), 1934.Google Scholar
Morgan, Benjamin, The Outward Mind: Materialist Aesthetics in Victorian Science and Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, David B., The Culture of Pain (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Pam, Realism (New York: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
Morrison, Ronald D., ‘Dickens, Household Worlds, and the Smithfield Controversy at the Time of the Great Exhibition’, in Animals in Victorian Literature and Culture: Contexts for Criticism, ed. Mazzeno, Laurence W. and Morrison, Ronald D. (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp.4164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moruno, Dolores, ‘Pain as Practice in Paolo Mantegazza’s Science of Emotions’, OSIRIS, 31 (2016), 137–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscoso, Javier, Pain: A Cultural History, trans. Thomas, Sarah and House, Paul (New York: Palgrave Macmillan: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullan, John, Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Murphy, Patricia, In Science’s Shadow: Literary Constructions of Late Victorian Women (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Murphy, Sara, ‘Heart, Science, and Regulation: Victorian Anti-Vivisection Discourse and the Human’, Law & Literature, 26.3 (2014), 365–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, Crispian, ‘D. H. Lawrence and Dogs: Canines and the Critique of Civilisation’, Journal of D. H. Lawrence Studies, 4.1 (2015), 95118.Google Scholar
Noakes, Richard, ‘Science in mid-Victorian Punch’, Endeavour, 26.3 (2002), 92–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
North, John, ‘The Rationale – Why Read Victorian Periodicals?’, in Victorian Periodicals: A Guide to Research, ed. Don Vann, J. and van Arsdel, Rosemary, 2 vols (New York: MLA, 1978), I, pp.320Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C., Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Oancea, Ana, ‘Literature and Vivisection: Re-evaluating Émile Zola’s Interpretation of Claude Bernard’, Neohelicon 45 (2018), 671–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obenchain, Theodore G., The Victorian Vivisection Debate: Frances Power Cobbe, Experimental Science, and the ‘Claims of Brutes’ (London: MacFarland & Co., 2012).Google Scholar
O’Leary, Timothy, ‘Critical Vivisection: Transforming Ethical Sensibilities’, in The Ends of Critique: Methods, Institutions, Politics, ed. Thiele, Kathrin, Kaiser, Birgit M. and O’Leary, Timothy (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2021), pp.139–57Google Scholar
Olmstead, J. M. D., Claude Bernard: Physiologist (New York: Harper, 1938).Google Scholar
Osborne, John, ‘Theories of Drama’, in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. Habib, M. A. R., 9 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), VI, pp.539–61.Google Scholar
Otis, Laura, ‘Howled out of the Country: Wilkie Collins and H. G. Wells Retry David Ferrier’, in Neurology and Literature, 1860–1920, ed. Stiles, Anne (New York: Palgrave, 2007), pp.2751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otis, Laura, Networking: Communicating with Bodies and Machines in the Nineteenth Century (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Tony, ‘From Morality to Medical Danger: Anti-Vivisectionism in the Novels of Three Late-Victorian/Early 20th Century Writers’, MANUSYA: A Journal of Humanities, 18.1 (2015), 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrinder, Patrick (ed.), H. G. Wells, The Critical Heritage (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972).Google Scholar
Paterson, Arthur, George Eliot’s Family Life and Letters (London: Selwyn & Blount Ltd., 1928).Google Scholar
Paton, William, ‘Epilogue’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas (London: Routledge, 1987), pp.316–64.Google Scholar
Pedlar, Valerie, ‘Experimentation or Exploitation? The investigations of David Ferrier, Dr Benjulia, and Dr Seward’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 28.3 (2003), 169–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, Derek C., Holyoak, Keith J., and Povinelli, Daniel J., ‘Darwin’s Mistake: Explaining the Discontinuity between Human and Non-human Minds’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 31(2008), 109–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, David, Romanticism and Animal Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pernick, Martin S., ‘The Calculus of Suffering in Nineteenth-Century Surgery’, Hastings Centre Report, 13.2 (1983), 2636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelps, Norm, The Longest Struggle: Animal Advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA (New York: Lantern Books, 2007).Google Scholar
Philippot, Didier (ed.), Gustave Flaubert, Memoire de la critique (Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne, 2006).Google Scholar
Philmus, Robert M., ‘Introducing Moreau’, in Wells, H. G., The Island of Doctor Moreau: A Variorum Text, ed. Philmus, Robert M. (Athens and London: University of Georgia Press, 1993), pp.xixlvii.Google Scholar
Pickering, Kenneth, and Thompson, Jayne, Naturalism in the Theatre, Its Development and Legacy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar
Pireddu, Nicoletta (ed.), ‘Introduction: Paolo Mantegazza, Fabulator of the Future’, in The Year 3000, A Dream, trans. Jacobson, David (Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 2010), pp.153.Google Scholar
Pittard, Christopher, Purity and Contamination in Late Victorian Detective Fiction (Ashgate: Farnham, 2011).Google Scholar
Pollock, Mary Sanders, ‘Ouida’s Rhetoric of Empathy: A Case Study in Victorian Anti-Vivisection Narrative’, in Figuring Animals: Essays on Animal Images in Art, Literature, Philosophy, and Popular Culture, ed. Pollock, Mary Sanders and Rainwater, Catherine (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp.135–59.Google Scholar
Porter, Roy, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity (New York: W. W. Norton, 1999).Google Scholar
Postlethwaite, Diana, ‘George Eliot and Science’, in The Cambridge Companion to George Eliot, ed. Levine, George (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp.98118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Leah, ‘Victorian Reading’, in The Cambridge History of Victorian Literature, ed. Flint, Kate. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp.3455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prideaux, Sue, Strindberg: A Life (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Punter, David, The Literature of Terror: History of Gothic Fictions from 1765 to the Present Day (London: Longman, 1980).Google Scholar
Pykett, Lyn, ‘Opinionated Ouida’, in Ouida and Victorian Popular Culture, ed. King, Andrew and Jordan, Jane (London: Routledge, 2013), pp.147–64.Google Scholar
Radick, Gregory, ‘Morgan’s Canon, Garner’s Phonograph, and the Evolutionary Origins of Language and Reason’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 33.1 (2000), 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radick, Gregory, The Simian Tongue: The Long Debate about Animal Language (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragnarsdóttir, Íris Lilja, ‘Verbal Vivisection: Animal Abuse and the English Language’, unpublished PhD thesis, Sigillum University (2020).Google Scholar
Raines, Melissa, ‘Knowing too Much: The Burden of Omniscience in The Lifted Veil’, The George Eliot Review, 43 (2012), 3946.Google Scholar
Raphael, Linda, ‘Imagining Another’s Pain: Privilege and Limitation in Parent and Child Relations’, in Pain and Emotion in Modern History, ed. Boddice, Rob (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), pp.220–42.Google Scholar
Rebellato, Dan, ‘Introduction: Naturalism and Symbolism: Early Modernist Practice’, in Routledge Drama Anthology and Sourcebook: From Modernism to Contemporary Performance, ed. Gale, Maggie and Deeney, John (Abingdon: Routledge, 2010), pp.625.Google Scholar
Rey, Roselyne, The History of Pain, trans. Wallace, Louise Elliot, Cadden, J. A., and Cadden, S. W. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Richards, Stewart, ‘Drawing the Life-Blood of Physiology: Vivisection and the Physiologists’ Dilemma, 1870–1900’, Annals of Science, 43.1 (1986), 2756CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, Stewart, ‘Vicarious Suffering, Necessary Pain: Physiological Method in Late Nineteenth-century Britain’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas (London: Routledge, 1987), pp.125–48.Google Scholar
Richardson, Angelique, ‘George Eliot, G. H. Lewes, and Darwin: Animals, Emotions, and Morals’, in After Darwin: Animals, Emotions, and the Mind, ed. Richardson, Angelique (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2013), pp.136–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigney, Anne, Imperfect History: The Elusive Past and the Legacy of Romantic Historicism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rilett, Beverley, ‘The Role of George Henry Lewes in George Eliot’s Career: A Reconsideration’, George Henry Lewes Studies, 69.1 (2017), 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinkel, Gene K., and Rinkel, Margaret E., The Picshuas of H. G. Wells, a Burlesque Diary (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Ritvo, Harriet, The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Roberts, Helene, ‘Exhibition and Review: The Periodical Press and the Victorian Art Exhibition System’, in The Victorian Periodical Press: Samplings and Soundings, ed. Shattock, Joanne and Wolff, Michael (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1982), pp.79107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Michael, ‘Introduction’ in Selected Essays by August Strindberg, ed. and trans. Robinson, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp.122.Google Scholar
Rokem, Freddie, ‘The Camera and the Aesthetics of Repetition: Strindberg’s Use of Space and Scenography in Miss Julie, A Dream Play, and The Ghost Sonata’, in Strindberg’s Dramaturgy, ed. Stockenström, Göran (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988), pp.107–28.Google Scholar
Rudacille, Deborah, The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Conflict between Animal Research and Animal Protection (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Rupke, Nicolaas (ed.), ‘Animal Experimentation from Antiquity to the end of the Eighteenth Century’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas (London: Routledge, 1987), pp.1447.Google Scholar
Rupke, NicholaasIntroduction’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective (London: Routledge, 1987), pp.113.Google Scholar
Rupke, NicholaasPro-vivisection in England in the Early 1880s: Arguments and Motives’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas (London: Routledge, 1987), pp.188213.Google Scholar
Rylance, Rick, Victorian Psychology and British Culture 1850-1880 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saintsbury, George, A Short History of French Literature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1917).Google Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert M., A Primate’s Memoir (New York: Touchstone, 2002).Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine, The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Schiller, Joseph, ‘Claude Bernard and Vivisection’, Journal of the History of Medicine, 22 (1967), 246–60.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Claude (ed.), Naturalism and Symbolism in European Theatre, 1850–1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Shattock, Joanne, ‘Contexts and Conditions of Criticism 1830–1914’, in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, ed. Habib, M. A. R., 9 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), VI, pp.2145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotwell, Allen R., ‘The Revival of Vivisection in the Sixteenth Century’, Journal of the History of Biology, 46.2 (2012), 171–97.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine, ‘Hysteria, Feminism and Gender’ in Hysteria Beyond Freud, ed. Gilman, Sander et al. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), pp.286344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugg, Wallace, ‘Humanitarian Attitudes in the Early Animal Experiments of the Royal Society’, Annals of Science, 24 (1968), 227328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumaker, J. R.Degenerationism and Mesmerism in Wilkie Collins’s Heart and Science’, South Carolina Review, 41.1 (2008), 102–9.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, Sally, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Science, The Make-Believe of a Beginning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Simons, John, Animals, Literature, and the Politics of Representation (London: Palgrave, 2002).Google Scholar
Sirabian, Robert, ‘The Conception of Science in Wells’s The Invisible Man’, Papers on Language and Literature, 37.4 (2001), 382403.Google Scholar
Smajić, Srdjan, Ghost-Seers, Detectives, and Spiritualists: Theories of Vision in Victorian Literature and Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, Mary Ellen, Encyclopaedia of Gothic Literature (New York: Library of Congress, 2005).Google Scholar
Sparks, Tabitha, ‘Surgical Injury and Narrative Cure in Wilkie Collins’s “Poor Miss Finch” and “Heart and Science”’, Journal of Narrative Theory, 32.1 (2002), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperlinger, Tom, ‘“The Sensitive Author”: George Eliot’, The Cambridge Quarterly, 36.3 (2007), 250–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Clair, William, ‘Romantic Biography: Conveying Personality, Intimacy, and Authenticity in an Age of Ink on Paper’, in On Life-Writing, ed. Leader, Zachary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp.4871.Google Scholar
Stauffer, John, ‘Foreword’, in American Protest Literature, ed. Trodd, Zoe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006), pp.xiixviii.Google Scholar
Steintrager, James A., Cruel Delight: Enlightenment Culture and the Inhuman (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Stiles, Anne, ‘Literature in “Mind”: H. G. Wells and the Evolution of the Mad Scientist’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 70.2 (2009), 317–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stounbjerg, Per, ‘“To Eat or Be Eaten – That Is the Question”: Incorporations and Rejections of the Other in Strindberg’s Autobiographical Prose Writings’, in August Strindberg and the Other, New Critical Approaches ed. Houe, Poul, Hakon Rossel, Sven and Stockenström, Göran (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2002), 133–47.Google Scholar
Straley, Jessica, ‘Love and Vivisection: Wilkie Collins’ Experiment in Heart and Science’, Nineteenth-Century Literature, 65.3 (2010), 348–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Alvin (ed.), ‘Fortnightly Review, The’, in British Literary Magazines: The Victorian and Edwardian Age, 1837–1913 (London: Greenwood Press, 1984) pp.131–5.Google Scholar
Swinkin, Rachel, ‘The Limits of Sympathy: Animals and Sentimentality in Eighteenth Century British Literature and Culture 1759–1810’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Columbia (1996).Google Scholar
Talairach-Vielmas, Laurence, Wilkie Collins, Medicine and the Gothic (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Tansey, E. M., ‘George Eliot’s Support for Physiology: The George Henry Lewes Trust 1879-1939’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 44.2 (1990), 221–40.Google Scholar
Tansey, E. M., ‘“The Queen Has Been Dreadfully Shocked”: Aspects of Teaching Experimental Physiology Using Animals in Britain, 1876–1986’, American Journal of Physiology, 19.1 (1998), 1833.Google Scholar
Taylor, Antony, ‘Shakespeare and Radicalism: The Uses and Abuses of Shakespeare in Nineteenth-Century Popular Politics’, Historical Journal, 45.2 (2002), 357–79.Google Scholar
Törnqvist, Egil, and Steene, Birgitta (eds. and trans.), Strindberg on Drama and Theatre (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trodd, Zoe, ‘The Civil Rights Movement and Literature of Social Protest’, in The Cambridge Companion to American Civil Rights Literature, ed. Armstrong, Julie (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp.1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, Richard, Shaftesbury, The Great Reformer (Oxford: Lion Hudson, 2010).Google Scholar
Turner, James, Reckoning with the Beast: Animals, Pain and Humanity in the Victorian Mind (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Turner, Lynn, Sellback, Undine, and Broglio, Ron (eds.), The Edinburgh Companion to Animal Studies (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tusmith, Bonnie, ‘The Inscrutable Albino in Contemporary Ethic Literature’, Amerasia Journal, 19.3 (1993), 85102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velten, Hannah, Beastly London: A History of Animals in the City (London: Reaktion Books Ltd., 2013).Google Scholar
Vilas-Boas, Gonçalo, ‘As vivissecações naturalistas de Strindberg’, Adagio, 17 (1996), 2235.Google Scholar
Vint, Sherryl, ‘Animals and Animality from the Island of Dr Moreau to the Uplift Universe’, Yearbook of English Studies, 37.2 (2007), 85102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, Keir, ‘Death at St Bernard’s: Anti-vivisection, Medicine, and the Gothic’, Journal of Victorian Culture, 18.2 (2013), 246–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Tamara, ‘“Overpowering Vitality”: Nostalgia and Men of Sensibility in the Fiction of Wilkie Collins’, Modern Language Quarterly, 63.4 (2002), 471500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkowitz, Judith R., Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class and the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1890).Google Scholar
Walters, J. Cuming, Tennyson: Poet, Philosopher, Idealist (New York: Haskell House, 1971).Google Scholar
Watt-Smith, Tiffany, On Flinching: Theatricality and Scientific Looking from Darwin to Shell-Shock (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weltman-Aron, B., ‘Le “procès-verbal” de l’expérience: Le réalisme selon Zola’, Excavatio, 3 (1993), 99106.Google Scholar
Wellek, René, A History of Modern Criticism: 1750–1950. Vol. IV. The Later Nineteenth-Century (Yale: Yale University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
West, Anna Thomas Hardy and Animals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Paul, ‘Darwin Wept: Science and the Sentimental Subject’, Journal of Victorian Culture, 16.2 (2011), 195213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Paul, ‘Darwin’s Emotions: The Scientific Self and the Sentiment of Objectivity’, History of Science Society, 100.4 (2009), 811–26.Google ScholarPubMed
White, Paul, ‘The Experimental Animal in Victorian Britain’, in Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, ed. Daston, Lorraine and Mitman, Greg (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005), pp.5981.Google Scholar
White, Paul, ‘Introduction: The Emotional Economy of Science’, Isis, 100.4 (2009), 792–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Paul, ‘Sympathy under the Knife: Experimentation in Late Victorian Medicine’, in Medicine, Emotion and Disease, 1700–1950, ed. Alberti, Fay Bound (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), pp.100–24.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jack, H. G. Wells: Critic of Progress (Baltimore: The Mirage Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Williamson, Lori, Power and Protest: Frances Power Cobbe and Victorian Society (New York: Rivers Oram Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Willis, Martin (ed.), Staging Science: Scientific Performance on Street, Stage and Screen (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, Martin Vision, Science, and Literature, 1870–1920: Ocular Horizons (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Winter, Alison, ‘Ethereal Epidemic: Mesmerism and the Introduction of Inhalation Anaesthesia to Early Victorian London’, Social History of Medicine, 4.1 (1991), 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, Cary, ‘Human, All Too Human: “Animal Studies” and the Humanities’, PMLA, 124.2 (2009), 564–75.Google Scholar
Wood, Sarah, Without Mastery: Reading and Other Forces (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2023).Google Scholar
Woolford, John, ‘Periodicals and the Practice of Literary Criticism, 1855–1864’, in The Victorian Periodical Press: Samplings and Soundings, ed. Shattock, Joanne and Wolff, Michael (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1982), pp.109–42.Google Scholar
Yee, Jennifer, ‘Émile Zola’s Black Lives: Colonial Experiments and the Limits of Empathy in La Joie de vivre’, Journal of the Society of Dix-Neuviémistes (2022), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, Audrey, Animal Analogy in Shakespeare’s Character Portrayal (Columbia University, New York: King’s Crown Press, 1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Asha Hornsby, University of St Andrews
  • Book: Vivisection and Late-Victorian Literary Culture
  • Online publication: 30 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009503532.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Asha Hornsby, University of St Andrews
  • Book: Vivisection and Late-Victorian Literary Culture
  • Online publication: 30 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009503532.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Asha Hornsby, University of St Andrews
  • Book: Vivisection and Late-Victorian Literary Culture
  • Online publication: 30 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009503532.016
Available formats
×