Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Economic Voting
  • Cited by 7
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2016
Print publication year:
2016
Online ISBN:
9781316556764
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316556764
Subjects:
Area Studies, American Studies, American Government, Politics and Policy, Politics and International Relations, Comparative Politics
Information

Book description

The conventional wisdom of economic voting theory argues that a nation's economic performance drives electoral outcomes. Therefore, voters will hold an administration accountable for its economic stewardship. Austin Hart challenges the simplicity of this notion, drawing on cognitive-psychological research on priming to demonstrate that the intensity of voters' exposure to economic campaign messages systematically conditions the strength of the economic vote. However, this study goes further than simply saying 'campaigns matter'. Here, we learn that candidates who control the campaign narrative can capitalize on favorable economic conditions or - contrary to the predictions of conventional theory - overcome unfavorable conditions. Although the aim is not to dismiss the importance of structural variables in the study of elections, Hart shows that the choices candidates make about what to say and how often shape election outcomes in ways that cannot be explained by contextual or institutional forces alone.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
References
Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rhode, David W.. 2002. Change and Continuity in the 2000 Elections. Washington, DC Google Scholar: CQ Press.
Achen, Christopher H. and Bartels, Larry M.. 2004 Google Scholar. Blind Retrospection: Electoral Responses to Drought, Flu, and Shark Attacks. Conference paper: Prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston. Madrid: Juan March Institute.
Adams, James, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2011. “Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties' Policy Statements during Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 55 Google Scholar(2): 370–382.
Aguilar Zinser, Adolfo. 1995. Vamos a ganar! La pugna de Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas por el poder. Mexico City Google Scholar: Oceano.
Ajzen, Icek A. and Sexton, James. 1999. “Depth of Processing, Belief Congruence, and Attitude-Behavior Correspondence.” In Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, ed. Chaiken, Shelly and Trope, Yaacov. New York Google Scholar: Guilford Press.
Alcañiz, Isabella and Hellwig, Timothy. 2011. “Who's to Blame? The Distribution of Responsibility in Developing Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 41 Google Scholar(2): 389–411.
Alesina, Alberto and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Allison, Paul D. 1999. “Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups.” Sociological Methods and Research 28 Google Scholar(2): 186–208.
Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor Google Scholar: University of Michigan Press.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Nagler, Jonathan. 1995. “Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39 Google Scholar(3): 714–744.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. “Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 42 Google Scholar(4): 1349–1363.
Andersen, Robert. 2003. “Do Newspapers Enlighten Preferences? Personal Ideology, Party Choice, and the Electoral Cycle: The United Kingdom, 1992–1997.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 Google Scholar(3): 601–619.
Anderson, Christopher J. 1995. Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Armonk Google Scholar: M.E.Sharpe.
Anderson, Christopher J. 2000. “Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies 19 Google Scholar: 151–170.
Anderson, Christopher J. 2007. “The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Annual Review of Political Science 10 Google Scholar(1): 271–296.
Anderson, Leslie, Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Stegmaier, Mary. 2003. “Post-Socialist Democratization: A Comparative Political Economy Model of the Vote for Hungary and Nicaragua.” Electoral Studies 22 Google Scholar(3): 469–484.
Anderson, Christopher J. and Just, Aida. 2013. “Legitimacy from Above: The Partisan Foundations of Support for the Political System in Democracies.” European Political Science Review 5 Google Scholar: 335–362.
Anderson, Christopher J., Mendes, Silvia, and Tverdova, Yuliya. 2004. “Endogenous Economic Voting: Evidence from the 1997 British Election.” Electoral Studies 23 Google Scholar(4): 683–708.
Andersen, Robert, Tilley, James, and Heath, Anthony F.. 2005. “Political knowledge and enlightened preferences: party choice through the electoral cycle.” British Journal of Political Science 35 Google Scholar(2): 285–302.
Anderson, Leslie, Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Stegmaier, Mary. 2003. “Post-Socialist Democratization: A Comparative Political Economy Model of the Vote for Hungary and Nicaragua.” Electoral Studies 22 Google Scholar(3): 469–484.
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative. New York Google Scholar: The Free Press.
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Iyengar, Shanto. 1996. “The Craft of Political Advertising: A Progress Report.” In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, ed. Mutz, Diana C., Sniderman, Paul M., and Brody, Richard A.. Ann Arbor Google Scholar: University of Michigan Press.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Iyengar, Shanto, Simon, Adam, and Valentino, Nicholas. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?” American Political Science Review 88 Google Scholar(4): 829–838.
Apple, R.W. Jr. 1992 Google Scholar. “The 1992 Campaign: Political Pulse – Ohio: Bush Surges in Ohio, His Big Battleground State.” New York Times, November 2.
Asch, Solomon E. 1946. “Forming Impressions of Personality.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41 Google Scholar(3): 258–290.
Baker, Andy. 2009. The Market and the Masses in Latin America. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, Andy and Greene, Kenneth F.. 2011. “The Latin American Left's Mandate: Free-Market Policies and Issue Voting in New Democracies.” World Politics 63 Google Scholar(1): 43–77.
Baker, Kendall L. and Norpoth, Helmut. 1981. “Candidates on Television: The 1972 Electoral Debates in West Germany.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45 Google Scholar(3): 329–345.
Banco Nacional de Mexico. 2000 Google Scholar. “Public Opinion Prior to the July 2 Elections.” Review of the Economic Situation in Mexico, June: 247.
Banks, Antoine J. and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2012. “Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 56 Google Scholar(2): 286–297.
Barker, David C. 2005. “Values, Frames and Persuasion in Presidential Nomination Campaigns.” Political Behavior 27 Google Scholar(4): 375–394.
Barker, David C., Carman, Christopher Jan, and Knight, Kathleen. 1998 Google Scholar. “Rush to Judgment: Framing Issues, Priming Values, and Changing Minds – A Model of Political Persuasion through Talk Radio.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Baron, Robert M. and Kenny, David A.. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 Google Scholar(6): 1173–1182.
Barro, Robert. 1973. “The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model.” Public Choice 14 Google Scholar(1): 19–42.
Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Bartels, Larry M. 1993. “Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review 87 Google Scholar(2): 267–285.
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40 Google Scholar(1): 194–230.
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24 Google Scholar(2): 117–150.
Bartels, Larry M. 2006. “Priming and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns.” In Capturing Campaign Effects, ed. Brady, Henry E. and Johnston, Richard. Ann Arbor Google Scholar: University of Michigan Press.
Bartels, Larry M. and Zaller, John. 2001. “Presidential Vote Models: A Recount.” P.S. Political Science and Politics 34 Google Scholar(1): 8–20.
Bates, Robert. 1989. Beyond the Miracles of the Market: The Political Economy of Agrarian Development in Kenya. Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Beltrán, Ulises. 2000. “Factores de ponderación del voto retrospectivo.” Política y Gobierno 7 Google Scholar(2): 425–442.
Beltrán, Ulises. 2003. “Venciendo la incertidumbre: El voto restropectivo en la elección de Julio de 2000 in México.” Política y Gobierno 10 Google Scholar(2): 325–358.
Beltrán, Ulises. 2009. “Introducción. El proceso electoral: Precampañas, campañas y resultado.” Política y Gobierno, Temático 1 Google Scholar: 5–39.
Berejikian, Jeffrey. 1992. “Revolutionary Collective Action and the Agent-Structure Problem.” American Political Science Review 86 Google Scholar(3): 647–657.
Berejikian, Jeffrey. 1997. “The Gains Debate: Framing State Choice.” American Political Science Review 91 Google Scholar(4): 789–805.
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul, and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting. Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Berger, Jonah, Meredith, Marc, and Wheeler, S. Christian. 2008. “Contextual Priming: Where People Vote Affects How They Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 Google Scholar(26): 8846–8849.
Bernstorff, Dagmar. 1972. “What the Elections Told.” Economic and Political Weekly 7 Google Scholar(51): 2451–2452.
Binder, David. 1972 Google Scholara. “In Bonn Campaign, the Stress is on ‘Imitsch.’” The New York Times, October 25: 2.
Binder, David. 1972 Google Scholarb. “Brandt Urges Opposition to Back Treaty.” The New York Times, November 8: 62.
Binder, David. 1972 Google Scholarc. “Brandt Leads Barzel in Crowd Appeal.” The New York Times, November 14: 2.
Binder, David. 1972 Google Scholard. “To the Polls on Brandt's Ostpolitik.” The New York Times, November 19: E2.
Bisgaard, Martin. 2015. “Bias Will Find a Way: Economic Perceptions, Attributions of Blame, and Partisan-Motivated Reasoning during Crisis.” Journal of Politics 77 Google Scholar(3): 849–860.
Bisgaard, Martin and Slothuus, Rune. 2015 Google Scholar. “How Changing Party Elite Cues Alter Citizens’ Perceptions of Economic Reality.” Unpublished manuscript.
Blais, André, Turgeon, Mathieu, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nadeau, Richard, and Nevitte, Neil. 2004. “Which Matters Most? Comparing the Impact of Issues and the Economy in American, British, and Canadian Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 34 Google Scholar(3): 555–563.
Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Campaign Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49 Google Scholar(2): 388–405.
Bratton, Michael, Mattes, Robert, and Gyimah-Boadi, E.. 2005. Public Opinion, Democracy and Market Reform in Africa. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Brewer, Paul R., Graf, Joseph, and Willnat, Lars. 2003. “Priming or Framing: Media Influence on Attitudes toward Foreign Countries.” The International Journal for Communication Studies 65 Google Scholar(6): 493–508.
Brians, Craig L. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. 1996. “Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Receptions from TV Commercials, TV News, and Newspapers.” American Journal of Political Science 40 Google Scholar: 172–193.
Bruhn, Kathleen. 2004. “The Making of the Mexican President, 2000: Parties, Candidates, and Campaign Strategy.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Bruhn, Kathleen. 2009. “López Obrador, Calderón, and the 2006 Presidential Campaign.” In Consolidating Mexico's Democracy, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I., Lawson, Chappell, and Moreno, Alejandro. Baltimore, MD Google Scholar: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Budge, Ian. 1993. “Issues, Dimensions, and Agenda Change in Post-War Democracies: Longterm Trends in Party Election Programs and Newspaper Reports in Twenty-Three Democracies.” In Agenda Formation, ed. Riker, William H.. Ann Arbor Google Scholar: University of Michigan Press.
Butler, David and Stokes, Donald. 1969. Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Electoral Choice. New York Google Scholar: St. Martin's Press.
Byung, Hee Soh. 1988. “Political Instability and Economic Fluctuations in the Republic of Korea.” Public Choice 57 Google Scholar(3): 259–274.
Camarena, Salvador and Patterson, Jorge Zepeda. 2007. El Presidente Electo. México, DF Google Scholar: Planeta.
Camp, Roderic Ai. 2004. “Citizen Attitudes toward Democracy and Vicente Fox's Victory in 2000.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York Google Scholar: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Campbell, James E. 2000. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station, TX Google Scholar: Texas A&M Press.
Campbell, James E. 2001. “The Referendum that Didn't Happen: The Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election.” P.S. Political Science and Politics 34 Google Scholar(1): 33–38.
Campello, Daniela and Zucco, Cesar Jr. 2015. “Merit, Chance, and the International Determinants of Government Success.” Working Paper, “Presidential Success and the World Economy.” Journal of Politics 78 Google Scholar(2): 589–602.
“Canada Tilts, Cautiously, Rightward.” 2006 Google Scholar. The New York Times, January 25: A20.
Canton, Darío and Jorrat, Jorge Raúl. 2002. “Economic Evaluations, Partisanship, and Social Biases of Presidential Voting in Argentina, 1995 and 1999.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14 Google Scholar(4): 413–427.
Carey, Sean and Lebo, Matthew J.. 2006. “Election Cycles and the Economic Voter.” Political Research Quarterly 59 Google Scholar(4): 543–556.
Carmines, Edward and Stimson, James. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Carsey, Thomas M. and Layman, Geoffrey C.. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50 Google Scholar(2): 464–477.
Chappell, Henry W. Jr. and Veiga, Linda G.. 2000. “Economics and Elections in Western Europe: 1960–1997.” Electoral Studies 19 Google Scholar(2–3): 183–197.
Chong, Dennis. 1993. “How People Think, Reason, and Feel About Rights and Liberties.” American Journal of Political Science 37 Google Scholar(3): 867–899.
Chong, Dennis. 2000. Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society. Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N.. 2007a. “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of Communication 57 Google Scholar(1): 99–118.
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N.. 2007b. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10 Google Scholar: 103–126.
Chong, Dennis and Wolinsky-Nahmias, Y.. 2005. “Green Fees: The Price of Open Space.” In Ambivalence, Politics, and Public Policy, ed. Craig, Stephen C. and Martinez, Michael D.. New York Google Scholar: Palgrave.
Claibourn, Michele P. 2008. “Making a Connection: Repetition and Priming in Presidential Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 70 Google Scholar(4): 1142–1159.
Clarke, Harold D., Kornberg, Allan, Scotto, Thomas, and Twyman, Joe. 2006. “Flawless Campaign, Fragile Victory: Voting the Canada's 2006 Federal Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 Google Scholar(4): 815–819.
Clarke, Harold D. and Zuk, Gary. 1987. “The Politics of Party Popularity: Canada, 1974–1979.” Comparative Politics 19 Google Scholar(3): 299–315.
Conover, Pamela J. and Feldman, Stanley. 1982. “Projection and the Perception of Candidates’ Issue Positions.” Political Research Quarterly 35 Google Scholar(2): 228–244.
Conradt, David P. and Lambert, Dwight. 1974. “Party System, Social Structure, and Competitive Politics in West Germany: An Ecological Analysis of the 1972 Federal Election.” Comparative Politics 7 Google Scholar(1): 61–86.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E.. New York Google Scholar: Free Press.
Cordoba, Jose. 2003 Google Scholar. “Introducing the Armani-Clad Woman Who Could Break Mexico's Gridlock.” Wall Street Journal, July 30.
Cotrim-Macieira, Josaine. 2005. “The Change to Win? The Brazilian Workers’ Party's 2002 General Election Marketing Strategy.” In Political Marketing: A Comparative Perspective, ed. Lilleker, Darren G. and Lees-Marshment, Jennifer. Manchester Google Scholar: Manchester University Press.
Coyne, Andrew. 2006 Google Scholar. “In from the Cold.” The New York Times, January 23: A19.
De Houwer, Jan., Hendrickx, H., and Bayens, F.. 1997. “Evaluative Learning with ‘Subliminally’ Presented Stimuli.” Consciousness and Cognition 6 Google Scholar(1): 87–107.
Dillon, Sam. 2000 Google Scholar. “Mexico's Ruling Party Reported to Quash Polls Predicting Its Defeat.” The New York Times, July 17.
Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. 2004. Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Domínguez, Jorge I. and McCann, James A.. 1995. “Shaping Mexico's Electoral Arena: The Construction of Partisan Cleavages in the 1988 and 1991 National Elections.” American Political Science Review 89 Google Scholar(1): 34–48.
Domínguez, Jorge I. and McCann, James A.. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore, MD Google Scholar: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York Google Scholar: Harper & Row.
Druckman, James N. 2001. “On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?” Journal of Politics 63 Google Scholar(4): 1041–1066.
Druckman, James N. and Nelson, Kjersten R.. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 47 Google Scholar(4): 728–744.
Duch, Raymond M. and Armstrong, David. 2009 Google Scholar. “Kramer Revisited: Comparing the Effect of Economic Attitudes and the Real Economy on Vote Choice.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Duch, Raymond M. and Falcó-Gimeno, Albert. 2015 Google Scholar. “Decision Making in Coalitions and the Economic Vote.” Paper presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Duch, Raymond M., Palmer, Harvey D., and Anderson, Christopher J.. 2000. “Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science 44 Google Scholar(4): 635–652.
Duch, Raymond M., Przepiorka, Wojtek, and Stevenson, Randolph. 2015. “Responsibility Attribution for Collective Decision Makers.” American Journal of Political Science 59 Google Scholar(2): 372–389.
Duch, Raymond M. and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, George C. III, Mitchell, William, and Welch, Reed. 1995. “Explaining Presidential Approval: The Importance of Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 39 Google Scholar(1): 108–134.
Erbring, Lutz, Goldenberg, Edie N., and Miller, Arthur. 1980. “Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by the Media.” American Journal of Political Science 24 Google Scholar(1):16–49.
Erikson, Robert S. 1989. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote.” American Political Science Review 83 Google Scholar(2): 567–573.
Erikson, Robert S., Bafumi, Joseph, and Wilson, Bret. 2001. “Was the 2000 Presidential Election Predictable?” Political Science & Politics 34 Google Scholar(4): 815–819.
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, Robert S. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2012. The Timeline of Presidential Elections: How Campaigns Do (and Do Not) Matter. Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Eskew, Carter and Shrum, Robert. 2001. “Carter Eskew and Robert Shrum.” In Electing the President 2000: The Insiders’ View, ed. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall and Waldman, Paul. Philadelphia, PA Google Scholar: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Evans, Geoffrey and Andersen, Robert. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” Journal of Politics 68 Google Scholar(1): 194–207.
Fair, Ray C. 1976. A Model of Macroeconomic Activity. Volume II: The Empirical Model. Pensacola, FL Google Scholar: Ballinger Publishing Co.
Fair, Ray C. 1978. “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 60 Google Scholar(2): 159–173.
Fair, Ray C. 2006 Google Scholar. “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President: 2004 Update.” Unpublished manuscript. Yale University.
Fazio, Russell. 2001. “On the Automatic Activation of Associated Evaluations: An Overview.” Cognition and Emotion 15 Google Scholar(2): 115–141.
Fazio, Russell H., Jackson, Joni R., Dunton, Bridget C., and Williams, Carol J.. 1995. “Variability in Automatic Activation as an Unobtrusive Measure of Racial Attitudes: A Bona Fide Pipeline?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 Google Scholar(6): 1013–1027.
Fazio, Russel H., Sanbonmatsu, David M., Powell, Martha C., and Kardes, Frank R.. 1986. “On the Automatic Activation of Attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 Google Scholar(2): 229–238.
Fearon, James. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50 Google Scholar(1): 5–25.
Festinger, Leon. 1957. Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL Google Scholar: Row, Peterson.
Finkel, Steven E. 1993. “Reexamining the ‘Minimal Effects’ Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 55 Google Scholar(1): 1–21.
Finkel, Steven E. and Schrott, Peter R.. 1995. “Campaign Effects on Voter Choice in the German Election of 1990.” British Journal of Political Science 25 Google Scholar(3): 349–377.
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven Google Scholar: Yale University Press.
Fischhoff, Baruch. 1976. “Attribution Theory and Judgment under Uncertainty.” In New Directions in Attribution Research, ed. Harvey, J.H., Ickes, W.J., and Kidd, R.F.. New York Google Scholar: Wiley.
Fischhoff, Baruch, Slovic, Paul, and Lichtenstein, Sarah. 1980. “Knowing What You Want: Measuring Labile Values.” In Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior, ed. Wallsten, T.. Hillsdale, NJ Google Scholar: Erlbaum.
Flores-Macías, Francisco. 2009. “Electoral Volatility in 2006: Which Voters Changed Their Minds and Why?” In Consolidating Mexico's Democracy, ed. Domínguez, J., Lawson, C., and Moreno, A.. Baltimore, MD Google Scholar: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Foer, Franklin. 2002. “Radical Solution.” New Republic 227 Google Scholar(13): 15–18.
Fowler, Anthony and Margolis, Michele. 2011. “The Political Consequences of Uninformed Voters.” Working paper. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Electoral Studies 34 Google Scholar(June): 100–110.
Fritz, Sarah and Morris, Dwight. 1992. The Handbook of Campaign Spending. Washington, DC Google Scholar: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Gamson, William A. and Modigliani, Andre. 1987. “The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action.” In Research in Political Sociology, Vol. 3, ed. Braungart, Richard D.. Greenwich, CT Google Scholar: JAI Press.
Gelman, Andrew and King, Gary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls so Variable When Votes Are so Predictable?” British Journal of Political Science 23 Google Scholar(4): 409–451.
Gerber, Alan, Gimpel, James G., Green, Donald P., and Shaw, Daron R.. 2007 Google Scholar. “The Influence of Television and Radio Advertising on Candidate Evaluations: Results from a Large Scale Randomized Experiment.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago.
Gerber, Alan, Gimpel, James G., Green, Donald P., and Shaw, Daron R.. 2011. “How Large and Long-Lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 105 Google Scholar(1): 135–150.
Gerber, Alan S. and Huber, Gregory A.. 2009. “Partisanship and Economic Behavior: Do Partisan Differences in Economic Forecasts Predict Real Economic Behavior?” American Political Science Review 103 Google Scholar(3): 407–426.
Gerber, Alan S. and Huber, Gregory A.. 2010. “Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments.” American Journal of Political Science 54 Google Scholar(1): 153–173.
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., and Washington, Ebonya. 2010. “Party Affiliation, Partisanship, and Political Beliefs: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 104 Google Scholar(4): 720–744.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Everitt, Joanna, Fournier, Patrick, and Nevitte, Neil. 2006. “Back to the Future? Making Sense of the 2004 Canadian Election Outside Quebec.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 39 Google Scholar(1): 1–25.
Glaser, Jack and Banaji, Mahzarin. 1999. “When Fair Is Foul and Foul Is Fair: Reverse Priming in Automatic Activation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 Google Scholar(4): 669–687.
“GNP Contenders Resume Mudslinging.” 2007 Google Scholar. The Chosun Ilbo, June 7, at http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200706/200706070014.html.
Goertzel, Ted G. 2011. Brazil's Lula: The Most Popular Politician on Earth. Boca Raton, FL Google Scholar: Brown Walker Press.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Goffman, Erving. 2006. “Cognitive Heterogeneity and Economic Voting: A Comparative Analysis of Four Democratic Electorates.” American Journal of Political Science 50 Google Scholar(1): 127–145.
González Gómez, Mauricio A. 1998. “Crisis and Economic Change in Mexico.” In Mexico Under Zedillo, ed. Purcell, Susan Kaufman and Rubio, Luis. Boulder Google Scholar: Lynne Rienner.
Grafström, Cassandra and Salmond, Rob. 2010 Google Scholar. “Moments of Clarity: Election Campaigns, Clarity of Responsibility, and Economic Voting.” Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Greenberg, Stanley. 2001. “Stanley Greenberg.” In Electing the President, 2000: The Insiders’ View, ed. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall and Waldman, Paul II. Philadelphia Google Scholar: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Greenberg, Stanley. 2009 Google Scholar. “Winning with the Economy – Or Without It.” The American Prospect 9, October: n. pag. Web. November 10, 2010, prospect.org/article/winning-economy-or-without-it-0 (September 19, 2009).
Greene, Kenneth. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Greene, Kenneth. 2011. “Campaign Persuasion and Nascent Partisanship in Mexico's New Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 55 Google Scholar(2): 398–416.
Greenwald, Anthony G., Klinger, Mark R., and Liu, Thomas J.. 1989. “Unconscious Processing of Dichoptically Masked Words.” Memory and Cognition 17 Google Scholar(1): 35–47.
Haftendorn, Helga. 2006. Coming of Age: German Foreign Policy Since 1945. Lanham Google Scholar: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hamann, Kerstin. 2000. “Linking Policies and Economic Voting: Explaining Reelection in the Case of the Spanish Socialist Party.” Comparative Political Studies 33 Google Scholar(8): 1018–1048.
Hansford, Thomas G. and Gomez, Brad T.. 2015. “Reevaluating the Sociotropic Economic Voting Hypothesis.” Electoral Studies 39 Google Scholar(1): 15–25.
Happy, J.R. 1989. “Economic Performance and Retrospective Voting in Canadian Federal Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 22 Google Scholar(2): 377–387.
Hart, Austin. 2013. “Can Candidates Activate or Deactivate the Economic Vote? Evidence from Two Mexican Elections.” Journal of Politics 75 Google Scholar(4): 1051–1063.
Hart, Austin and Middleton, Joel. 2014. “Priming under Fire: Reverse Causality and the Classic Media Priming Hypothesis.” Journal of Politics 76 Google Scholar(2): 581–592.
Healy, Andrew and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2014. “Substituting the End for the Whole: Why Voters Respond Primarily to the Election-Year Economy.” American Journal of Political Science 58 Google Scholar(1): 31–47.
Healy, Andrew and Malhotra, Neil. 2010. “Random Events, Economic Losses, and Retrospective Voting: Implications for Democratic Competence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5 Google Scholar: 193–208.
Healy, Andrew, Malhotra, Neil, and Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung. 2010. “Irrelevant Events Affect Voters’ Evaluations of Government Performance.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 Google Scholar(29): 12804–12809.
Hellwig, Timothy. 2001. “Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting.” Journal of Politics 63 Google Scholar(4): 1141–1162.
Hellwig, Timothy. 2012. “Constructing Accountability: Party Position Taking and Economic Voting.” Comparative Political Studies 45 Google Scholar(1): 91–118.
Hellwig, Timothy. 2015. Globalization and Mass Politics: Retaining the Room to Maneuver. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, Dirk, De Houwer, Jan, and Eelen, Paul. 1996. “Evaluative Decision Latencies Mediated by Induced Affective Sales.” Behaviour Research and Therapy 34 Google Scholar(5–6): 483–488.
Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr. 1987. The American Political Economy: Macroeconomics and Electoral Politics. Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Higgins, E. Tory, Bargh, John A., and Lombardi, Wendy J.. 1985. “The Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 11 Google Scholar(1): 59–69.
Higgins, E. Tory and King, Gary. 1981. “Accessibility of Social Constructs: Information-Processing Consequences of Individual and Contextual Variability.” In Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction, ed. Cantor, Nancy and Kihlstrom, John. Hillsdale, NJ Google Scholar: Erlbaum.
Hillygus, D. Sunshine and Shields, Todd G.. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Hinich, Melvin J. and Unger, Michael C.. 1997. Analytical Politics. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Beverly Hills Google Scholar: Sage.
Holbrook, Thomas M. 2001. “Forecasting with Mixed Economic Signals: A Cautionary Tale.” P.S. Political Science and Politics 34 Google Scholar(1): 39–44.
Huber, Gregory A. and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2007. “Identifying the Persuasive Effects of Presidential Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 51 Google Scholar(4): 957–977.
Huber, Gregory A., Hill, Seth J., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Sources of Bias in Retrospective Decision Making: Experimental Evidence on Voters’ Limitations in Controlling Incumbents.” American Political Science Association 106 Google Scholar(4): 720–741.
Huber, Gregory A. and Lapinski, John S.. 2006. “The ‘Race Card’ Revisited: Assessing Racial Priming in Policy Contests.” American Journal of Political Science 50 Google Scholar(2): 421–440.
Hunter, Wendy. 2010. The Transormation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil, 1989-2000. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, Shanto and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News that Matters. Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, Shanto, Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 1984. “The Evening News and Presidential Evaluations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 Google Scholar(4): 778–787.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1994. “Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming: The Use of Private Polls in Kennedy's 1960 Presidential Campaign.” American Political Science Review 88 Google Scholar(3): 527–540.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Jiménez, Sergio. 2006 Google Scholar. “Calderón admite errores en campaña y que no avanza.” El Universal, March 2. www.eluniversal.com.mx/nacion/135728.html.
Johnston, Richard, Blais, Andre, Brady, Henry E., and Crête, Jean. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Johnston, Richard, Hagen, Michael G., and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2004. The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, Bryan D. 1999. “Bounded Rationality.” Annual Review of Political Science 2 Google Scholar(1): 297–321.
Jones, Bryan D. and Baumgartner, Frank M.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 Google Scholar(2): 263–291.
Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39 Google Scholar(4): 341–350.
Kayser, Mark A. 2014. “The Elusive Economic Vote.” In Comparing Democracies 4, ed. LeDuc, Lawrence, Niemi, Richard G., and Norris, Pippa. Thousand Oaks, CA Google Scholar: Sage.
Kayser, Mark A. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2011. “Performance Pressure: Patterns of Partisanship and the Economic Vote.” European Journal of Political Research 50 Google Scholar(3): 365–394.
Key, V.O. (1966). The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Harvard University Press.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Kinder, Donald R. and Kiewiet, E. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11 Google Scholar(2): 129–161.
Kinsley, Michael. 2000 Google Scholar. “The Art of Finger-Pointing: Why Wait until Next Week? Let's Start Now.” Slate, October 31.
Klauer, Karl C. 1997. “Affective Priming.” European Review of Social Psychology 8 Google Scholar(1): 63–107.
Klesner, Joseph L. 2004. “The Structure of the Mexican Electorate: Social, Attitudinal, and Partisan Bases of Vicente Fox's Victory.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Klesner, Joseph L. 2009. “A Sociological Analysis of the 2006 Elections.” In Consolidating Mexico's Democracy, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I., Lawson, Chappell, and Moreno, Alejandro. Baltimore, MD Google Scholar: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Klingemann, Hans D. and Pappi, Franz Urban. 1970. “The 1969 Bundestag Election in the Federal Republic of Germany.” Comparative Politics 2 Google Scholar(4): 523–548.
Klinger, Mark R., Burton, Philip C., and Pitts, G. Shane. 2000. “Mechanisms of Unconscious Priming I: Response Competition Not Spreading Activation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 Google Scholar(2): 441–455.
Knapp, Bill. 2001. “Bill Knapp.” In Electing the President 2000: The Insiders’ View, ed. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall and Waldman, Paul. Philadelphia, PA Google Scholar: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kolbert, Elizabeth. 1992 Google Scholar. “The 1992 Campaign: The Media; Perot to Unveil a New Ad Pitch, but Will It Sell?” The New York Times, October 3: 1.
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 77 Google Scholar(1): 92–111.
Krauss, Clifford. 2006 Google Scholar. “A Conservative Evolves, and Leads a Canadian Race.” The New York Times, January 16: A4.
Krosnick, Jon A. and Brannon, Laura A.. 1993. “The Impact of the Gulf War on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Multidimensional Effects of Political Involvement.” American Political Science Review 87 Google Scholar(4): 963–975.
Krosnick, Jon A. and Kinder, Donald P.. 1990. “Altering the Foundations of Support for the President through Priming.” American Political Science Review 84 Google Scholar(2): 497–512.
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 Google Scholar(3): 480–498.
“La alternancia real Es Cárdenas.” 2000 Google Scholar. La Jornada, June 26.
Ladd, Jonathan. 2007. “Predispositions and Public Support for the President during the War on Terrorism.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71 Google Scholar(4): 511–538.
Lang, Kurt and Lang, Gladys Engel. 1966. “The Mass Media and Voting.” In Reader in Public Opinion and Communication, ed. Berelson, Bernard and Janowitz, Morris. New York Google Scholar: Free Press.
Langston, Joy. 2009. “The PRI's 2006 Presidential Campaign.” In Consolidating Mexico's Democracy, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I., Lawson, Chappell, and Moreno, Alejandro. Baltimore, MD Google Scholar: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Laux, William E. 1973. “West German Political Parties and the 1972 Bundestag Election.” The Western Political Quarterly 26 Google Scholar(3): 507–528.
Lawson, Chappell. 2004a. “Mexico's Great Debates: The Televised Candidate Encounters of 2000 and Their Electoral Consequences.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Lawson, Chappell. 2004b. “Television Coverage, Vote Choice, and the 2000 Campaign.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Lawson, Chappell. 2006 Google Scholar. “Preliminary Findings from the Mexico 2006 Panel Study: Blue States and Yellow States.” http://web.mit.edu/polisci/reserach/mexico06/Region_and_demographics8.doc.
Lawson, Chappell. 2009. “Introduction: The Mexican 2006 Election in Context.” In Consolidating Mexico's Democracy, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I., Lawson, Chappell, and Moreno, Alejandro. Baltimore, MD Google Scholar: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lawson, Chappell and Klesner, Joseph. 2004. “Political Reform, Electoral Participation, and the Campaign of 2000.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Lawson, Chappell and McCann, James. 2005. “Television Coverage, Media Effects, and Mexico's 2000 Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 35 Google Scholar(1): 1–30.
Lawson, Chappell, et al. 2000 Google Scholar. “Mexico 2000 Panel Study.” Available online at: http://web.mit.edu/polisci/faculty/C.Lawson.html.
Lawson, Chappell, et al. 2007 Google Scholar. “The Mexico 2006 Panel Study. Waves 1–3.” Available online at: http://web.mit.edu/clawson/www/polisci/research/mexico06/index.html.
Lazarsfeld, Paul, Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudot, Hazel. 1948. The People's Choice. New York Google Scholar: Columbia University Press.
Lee, Aie-Rie and Glasure, Yong U.. 1995. “Party Identifiers in South Korea: Differences in Issue Orientations.” Asian Survey 35 Google Scholar(4): 367–376.
Lee, Hyeon-Woo. 1998. “Economic Voting in Korea: Analysis of the 15th Presidential Election.” Korea Observer 29 Google Scholar(4): 635–662.
Lee, Sophie Jiseon. 2011 Google Scholar. “Economic Voting and Regionalism in South Korea: A Statistical Analysis of the 2007 Presidential Election.” Master's thesis. Available from Duke University Libraries at: http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/3779.
Lenz, Gabriel S. 2009. “Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 53 Google Scholar(4): 821–837.
Lenz, Gabriel S. 2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policy and Performance. Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
Levy, Jack. 1994. “Prospect Theory and International Relations: Theoretical Applications and Analytical Problems.” In Avoiding Losses/Taking Risks: Prospect Theory in International Politics, ed. Farnham, Barbara. Ann Arbor Google Scholar: University of Michigan Press, 119–146.
Levy, Jack. 1997. “Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 41 Google Scholar(1): 87–112.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor Google Scholar: University of Michigan Press.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Mitchell, Glenn. 1990. “Modelos Transnacionales de Voto Economico: Estudio de un Conjunto de Paises Europeos.” Revista del Instituto de Estudios Economicos 4 Google Scholar: 65–81.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Mitchell, Glenn. 1993 Google Scholar. “Bringing Politics Back In: The French Lesson for Popularity Functions.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Paldam, Martin. 2000. “Economic Voting: An Introduction.” Electoral Studies 19 Google Scholar(2–3): 113–121.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 3 Google Scholar(1): 183–219.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Stegmaier, Mary. 2007. “Economic Models of Voting.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. Goodin, R.E.. Oxford Google Scholar: Oxford University Press.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Stegmaier, Mary. 2008. “The Economic Vote in Transitional Democracies.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 18 Google Scholar(August): 303–323.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Tien, Charles. 2001. “Modeling the Future: Lessons from the Gore Forecast.” P.S. Political Science and Politics 34 Google Scholar(1): 21–23.
Lichbach, Mark. 2003. Is Rational Choice Theory All of Social Science? Ann Arbor Google Scholar: University of Michigan Press.
Lin, Tse-min. 1999. “The Historical Significance of Economic Voting, 1872–1996.” Social Science History 23 Google Scholar(4): 561–591.
Lockerbie, Brad. 2008. Do Voters Look to the Future? Economics and Elections. Albany Google Scholar: State University of New York Press.
Lujambio, Alonso. 2001 Google Scholar. “Dinero y democratización: El financiamiento y la fiscalización de los partidos políticos en la trasición mexicana a la democracia, 1988–2000.” International Seminar on Money and Electoral Competition, Federal Elections Institute, Mexico City, June 5–8.
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review 86 Google Scholar(3): 597–611.
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Magaloni, Beatriz and Poiré, Alejandro. 2004. “The Issues, the Vote, and the Mandate for Change.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000, ed. Dominguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Markus, Gregory. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 32 Google Scholar(1): 137–154.
Markus, Gregory B. and Converse, Philip E.. 1979. “Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice.” American Political Science Review 73 Google Scholar(4): 1055–1070.
Matthews, John Scott and Johnston, Richard. 2010. “The Campaign Dynamics of Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies 29 Google Scholar(2010):13–24.
McCann, James A. 2004. “Primary Priming.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
McCann, James A. and Lawson, Chappell. 2003. “An Electorate Adrift? Public Opinion and the Quality of Democracy in Mexico.” Latin American Research Review 38 Google Scholar(3): 60–81.
McDermott, Rose. 1998. Risk Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor Google Scholar: University of Michigan Press.
McDermott, Rose. 2004. “Prospect Theory in Political Science: Gains and Losses from the First Decade.” Political Psychology 25 Google Scholar(2): 289–312.
McGuire, William J. 1973. “Persuasion, Resistance, and Attitude Change.” In Handbook of Communication, ed. De Sola Pool, I. and Schramm, Wilbur. New York Google Scholar: Random House.
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Meyer, David E. and Schvaneveldt, Roger W.. 1971. “Facilitation in Recognizing Pairs of Words.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 Google Scholar(2): 227–234.
Milbank, Dana. 2001. Smashmouth. New York Google Scholar: Basic Books.
Miller, Joanne M. 2007. “Examining the Mediators of Agenda Setting: A New Experimental Paradigm Reveals the Role of Emotion.” Political Psychology 28 Google Scholar(6): 689–717.
Miller, Joanne M. and Krosnick, Jon A.. 1998 Google Scholar. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations; Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source.” Ohio State University. Unpublished manuscript.
Miller, Joanne M. and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2000. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations; Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source.” American Journal of Political Science 44 Google Scholar(2): 295–309.
Min, Jeonghun. 2010 Google Scholar. “Campaign Effects in Korean Presidential Elections.” PhD dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Min, Jeonghun. 2011. “How Do Campaign Events Affect Regionalism during South Korean Presidential Campaigns?” Asian Survey 51 Google Scholar(5): 899–925.
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan. 1991. El Tiempo de la Legitimidad: Elecciones, Autoritarismo y Democracia en México. México, DF Google Scholar: Cal y Arena.
Monroe, Kristen R. 1984. Presidential Popularity and the Economy. New York Google Scholar: Praeger.
Monroe, Kristen R. and Erickson, Lynda. 1986. “The Economy and Political Support: The Canadian Case.” Journal of Politics 48 Google Scholar(3): 616–647.
Moreno, Alejandro. 2004. “The Effect of Negative Campaigns on Mexican Voters.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Moreno, Alejandro. 2009. “The Activation of Economic Voting in the 2006 Mexican Presidential Campaign.” In Consolidating Mexico's Democracy: The 2006 Presidential Campaign in Comparative Perspective, ed. Domínguez, Jorge, Lawson, Chappell, and Moreno, Alejandro. Baltimore, MD Google Scholar: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Muñoz, Paula. 2012 Google Scholar. “Political Marketing Meets Street Politics: An Informational Theory of Electoral Clientelism.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas.
Mutz, Diana. 1992. “Mass Media and the Depoliticization of Personal Experience.” American Journal of Political Science 36 Google Scholar(2): 483–508.
Nannestad, Peter and Paldam, Martin. 1994. “The VP Function: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after 25 Years.” Public Choice 79 Google Scholar: 213–245.
Neely, James H. 1976. “Semantic Priming and Retrieval from Lexical Memory: Evidence for Faciliatory and Inhibitory Processes.” Memory and Cognition 4 Google Scholar(5): 648–654.
Neely, James H. 1977. “Semantic Priming and Retrieval from Lexical Memory: Roles of Inhibitionless Spreading Activation and Limited-Capacity Attention.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 106 Google Scholar(3): 225–254.
Nelson, Thomas E. and Kinder, Donald R.. 1991 Google Scholar. “Framing Effects Need Not Depend on Changes in Construct Accessibility.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
Nelson, Thomas E. and Kinder, Donald R.. 1996. “Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 58 Google Scholar(4): 1055–1078.
Nelson, Thomas E., Oxley, Zoe M., and Clawson, Rosalee A.. 1997. “Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects.” Political Behavior 19 Google Scholar(3): 221–246.
Nelson, Thomas E., Willey, Elaine, and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1998 Google Scholar. “Belief Content, Importance, and Accessibility in Issue Opinion.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
Niemi, Richard G. and Weisberg, Herb F.. 2001. “Is the Party System Changing?” In Controversies in Voting Behavior, ed. Niemi, Richard G. and Weisberg, Herb F., edn. Washington, DC Google Scholar: CQ Press.
Nisbett, Richard. E. and Ross, Lee. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Google Scholar: Prentice-Hall.
“No Fight on Ostpolitik.” 1972 Google Scholar. The New York Times, October 17: 40.
Norpoth, Helmut. 1996. “The Economy.” In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, ed. LeDuc, L., Niemi, R.G. and Norris, P.. Thousand Oaks, CA Google Scholar: Sage.
Norpoth, Helmut. 2001. “Divided Government and Economic Voting.” Journal of Politics 63 Google Scholar(2): 414–435.
Norpoth, Helmut. 2004. “Bush v. Gore: The Recount of Economic Voting.” In Models of Voting in Presidential Elections, ed. Weisberg, H.F. and Wilcox, C.. Stanford, CA Google Scholar: Stanford University Press.
Novaes, Lucas M. and Schuimerini, Luis E.. 2015 Google Scholar. “Exogenous Commodity Shocks and the Electoral Returns to Office: Evidence from Brazil.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Oberauer, Klaus and Kliegl, Reinhold. 2006. “A Formal Model of Capacity Limits in Working Memory.” Journal of Memory and Language 55 Google Scholar: 601–626.
Onishi, Norimitsu. 2007 Google Scholara. “Korean Leaders Agree on Economic Projects.” The New York Times, October 4: A14.
Onishi, Norimitsu. 2007 Google Scholarb. “The Evolution of a Man Called ‘Bulldozer.’” The New York Times, December 20: A8.
Onishi, Norimitsu. 2007 Google Scholarc. “South Korea's Next Leader Says He'll Chide the North.” The New York Times, December 21: A5.
Ortiz, Francisco. 2002. Comprender a la gente: Por qué ganó Fox. Mexico City Google Scholar: Nuevo Siglo.
Pacek, Alexander. 1994. “Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 38 Google Scholar(3): 723–744.
Pacek, Alexander and Radcliff, Benjamin. 1995. “Political Economy of Competitive Elections in the Developing World.” American Journal of Political Science 39 Google Scholar(3): 745–759.
Paldam, Martin. 1991. “How Robust Is the Vote Function?” In Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, ed. Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M.S., and Lafay, J.D., pp. 9–32. Ann Arbor Google Scholar: University of Michigan Press.
Paolino, Philip. 2005. “Voter Behavior in Democratizing Nations: Reconsidering the Two-Step Model.” Political Research Quarterly 58 Google Scholar(1): 107–117.
Pardos-Prado, Sergi and Sagarzazu, Iñaki. 2015 Google Scholar. “The Political Conditioning of Subjective Economic Evaluations: The Role of Party Discourse.” British Journal of Political Science available on CJO2014. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000428.
Peffley, Mark, Feldman, Stanley, and Sigelman, Lee. 1987. “Economic Conditions and Party Competence: Process or Belief Revision.” Journal of Politics 49 Google Scholar(1): 100–121.
Peffley, Mark and Williams, John T.. 1985. “Attributing Presidential Responsibility for National Economic Problems.” American Politics Research 13 Google Scholar(4): 393–425.
Petty, Richard E. and Wegener, Duane T.. 1998. “Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edn, Vol. 2, ed. Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardner. New York Google Scholar: McGraw-Hill.
Pollock, Phillip H. III. 1994. “Issues, Values, and Critical Moments: Did ‘Magic’ Johnson Transform Public Opinion on AIDS?” American Journal of Political Science 38 Google Scholar(2): 426–446.
Popkin, Samuel L. 2012. The Candidate: What It Takes to Win – and Hold – the White House. New York Google Scholar: Oxford University Press.
Porto, Mauro P. 2007. “Framing Controversies: Television and the 2002 Presidential Election in Brazil.” Political Communication 24 Google Scholar(1): 19–36.
Posner, Daniel N. and Simon, David J.. 2002. “Economic Conditions and Incumbent Support in Africa's New Democracies: Evidence from Zambia.” Comparative Political Studies 35 Google Scholar(3): 313–336.
Powell, G. Bingham and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37 Google Scholar(2): 391–414.
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Rabin, Matthew. 1998. “Psychology and Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 Google Scholar(1): 11–46.
Remmer, Karen L. 1991. “The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin American in the 1980s.” American Political Science Review 85 Google Scholar(3): 777–800.
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism. San Francisco Google Scholar: W. H. Freeman.
Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven Google Scholar: Yale University Press.
Riker, William H. 1990. “Heresthetic and Rhetoric in the Spatial Model.” In Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting, ed. Enelow, James M. and Hinich, Melvin J.. Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Riker, William H. 1993. Agenda Formation. Ann Arbor Google Scholar: University of Michigan Press.
Riker, William H. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven Google Scholar: Yale University Press.
Rosenbaum, David E. 1991 Google Scholara. “Challenged by Foes on Economy, Bush Wonders whether to Answer.” The New York Times, October 31: A1.
Rosenbaum, David E. 1991 Google Scholarc. “Bush's Time to Act; Passive Approach on the Recession Collides with Harsh Political Reality.” The New York Times, December 17: D21.
Rosenstiel, Tom. 1993. Strange Bedfellows: How Television and the Presidential Candidates Changed American Politics, 1992. New York Google Scholar: Hyperion.
Rosenthal, Andrew. 1991 Google Scholara. “Sununu Resigns under Fire as Chief Aide to President; Cites Fear of Hurting Bush.” The New York Times, December 3: A1.
Rosenthal, Andrew. 1991 Google Scholarb. “Bush's Campaign Advisers Split with White House on Economy.” The New York Times, December 23: A1.
Royed, Terry J., Leyden, Kevin M., and Borrelli, Stephen. 2000. “Is ‘Clarity of Responsibility’ Important for Economic Voting? Revisiting Powell and Whitten's Hypothesis.” British Journal of Political Science 30 Google Scholar: 669–698.
Royer, Charles T. 1994. Campaign for President: The Managers Look at ’92. Hollis, NH Google Scholar: Hollis Publishing Company.
Rudolph, Thomas J. 2003. “Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attributions.” American Journal of Political Science 47 Google Scholar(4): 698–713.
Rusciano, Frank Louis. 1992. “Rethinking the Gender Gap: The Case of West German Elections, 1949–1987.” Comparative Politics 24 Google Scholar(3): 335–357.
Samuels, David. 2004. “From Socialism to Social Democracy: Party Organization and the Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 37 Google Scholar(9): 999–1024.
Samuels, David and Hellwig, Timothy. 2010. “Elections and Accountability for the Economy: A Conceptual and Empirical Reassessment.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 20 Google Scholar(4): 393–419.
Sanders, David. 2003. “Party Identification, Economic Perceptions, and Voting in British General Elections, 1974–1997.” Electoral Studies 22 Google Scholar(2): 239–263.
Schacter, Daniel L. 1987. “Implicit Memory: History and Current Status.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13 Google Scholar(3): 501–518.
Schedler, Andreas. 2005. “From Electoral Authoritarianism to Democratic Consolidation.” In Mexico's Democracy at Work, ed. Crandall, R., Paz, G., and Roett, R.. Boulder Google Scholar: Lynne Rienner.
Schrott, Peter R. and Lanoue, David J.. 1992. “How to Win a Televised Debate: Candidate Strategies and Voter Response in Germany, 1972–1987.” British Journal of Political Science 22 Google Scholar(4): 445–467.
Sears, David O. and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1999. “Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults’ Political Predispositions.” Journal of Politics 61 Google Scholar(1): 1–28.
Sears, David O. and Lau, Richard R.. 1983. “Inducing Apparently Self-Interested Political Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 27 Google Scholar(2): 223–252.
Shaw, Daron R. 1999. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–1996.” American Political Science Review 93 Google Scholar(2): 345–361.
Shaw, Daron R. 2006. The Race to 270: The Electoral College and Campaign Strategies in 2000 and 2004. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Shirk, David. 2005. Mexico's New Politics: The PAN and Democratic Change. Boulder Google Scholar: Lynne Rienner.
Shirk, David. 2009. “Choosing Mexico's 2006 Presidential Candidates.” In Consolidating Mexico's Democracy, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I., Lawson, Chappell, and Moreno, Alejandro. Baltimore, MD Google Scholar: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Shrum, Robert. 2007. No Excuses: Concessions of a Serial Campaigner. New York Google Scholar: Simon & Schuster.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Sides, John. 2006. “The Origins of Campaign Agendas.” British Journal of Political Science 36 Google Scholar(3): 407–436.
Sides, John. 2007. “The Consequences of Campaign Agendas.” American Politics Research 35 Google Scholar(4): 465–488.
Sides, John. 1979. Models of Thought. New Haven Google Scholar: Yale University Press.
Simonovits, Gabor. 2015. “An Experimental Approach to Economic Voting.” Political Behavior 37 Google Scholar(4): 977–994.
Singer, Matthew M. 2009. “Defendamos lo que hemos logrado.” Política y Gobierno 15 Google Scholar(Special Issue on 2006 Mexican Election, Fall): 199–236.
Singer, Matthew M. 2011. “Who Says ‘It's the Economy’? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance.” Comparative Political Studies 44 Google Scholar(3): 284–312.
Singer, Matthew M. 2013a. “Economic Voting in an Era of (Non)Crisis: The Changing Electoral Agenda in Latin America, 1982–2010.” Comparative Politics 45 Google Scholar(2): 169–185.
Singer, Matthew M. 2013b. “What Goes Around Comes Around: Perceived Vulnerable Employment and Economic Voting in Developing Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 52 Google Scholar(2): 143–163.
Sniderman, Paul and Theriault, Sean. 1999 Google Scholar. “The Dynamics of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Sniderman, Paul and Theriault, Sean. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Studies in Public Opinion, ed. Saris, W.E. and Sniderman, P.M., pp. 133–165. Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Soroka, Stuart N. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion and Policy. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Srull, T.K. and Wyer, R.S. Jr. 1979. “The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 Google Scholar(10): 1660–1672.
Stevens, Stuart. 2001. The Big Enchilada: Campaign Adventures with the Cockeyed Optimists from Texas Who Won the Biggest Prize in Politics. New York Google Scholar: Free Press.
Stevenson, Randolph T. and Vavreck, Lynn. 2000. “Does Campaign Length Matter?” British Journal of Political Science 30 Google Scholar(2): 217–235.
Stigler, George J. 1973. “General Economic Conditions and National Elections.” American Economic Review 63 Google Scholar: 160–164.
Stoker, Laura. 1993. “Judging Presidential Character: The Demise of Gary Hart.” Political Behavior 15 Google Scholar(2): 193–223.
Stubager, Rune, Botterill, Niels W., Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Nadeau, Richard. 2014. “Scope Conditions of Economic Voting: The Danish Exception?” Electoral Studies 34 Google Scholar(1): 16–26.
Takens, Janet, Kleinnijenhuis, Jan, Hoof, Anita van, and Atteveldt, Wouter van. 2015. “Party Leaders in the Media and Voting Behavior: Priming Rather Than Learning or Projection.” Political Communication 32 Google Scholar(2): 249–267.
Taylor, Shelley E. and Crocker, Jennifer. 1981. “Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing.” In Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, ed. Higgins, E. et al. Hillsdale, NJ Google Scholar: Erlbaum.
Tesler, Michael. 2015. “Priming Predispositions and Changing Policy Positions: An Account of When Mass Opinion Is Primed or Changed.” American Journal of Political Science 59 Google Scholar(4): 806–824.
Tucker, Joshua A. 2001. “Economic Conditions and the Vote for Incumbent Parties in Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic from 1990 to 1996.” Post-Soviet Affairs 17 Google Scholar(4): 309–331.
Tufte, Edward. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel. 1981. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 Google Scholar(4157): 1124–1131.
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., and White, Ismael. 2002. “Cues That Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes during Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 96 Google Scholar(1): 75–90.
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., and Williams, Dmitri. 2004. “The Impact of Political Advertising on Knowledge, Internet Information Seeking, and Candidate Preference.” Journal of Communication 54 Google Scholar(2): 337–354.
van der Brug, Wouter, van der Eijk, Cees, and Franklin, Mark N.. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Vavreck, Lynn. 2009. The Message Matters. Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
von Dannenberg, Julia. 2008. The Foundations of Ostpolitik: The Making of the Moscow Treaty between West Germany and the USSR. Oxford Google Scholar: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–130.
West, Darrell M. 1997. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952–1996, edn. Washington, DC Google Scholar: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
Weyland, Kurt. 1996. “Risk Taking in Latin American Economic Restructuring: Lessons From Prospect Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 40 Google Scholar(2): 185–207.
Whitten, Guy D. and Palmer, Harvey D.. 1999. “Cross-National Analyses of Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies 18 Google Scholar(1): 49–67.
Wilcox, Nathaniel T. and Wlezien, Christopher. 1993. “The Contamination of Responses to Survey Items: Economic Perceptions and Political Judgments.” Political Analysis 5 Google Scholar: 181–213.
Wilkin, Sam, Haller, Brandon, and Norpoth, Helmut. 1997. “From Argentina to Zambia: A World-Wide Test of Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies 16 Google Scholar(3): 301–316.
Williams, Richard. 2009. “Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients across Groups.” Sociological Methods and Research 37 Google Scholar(4): 531–559.
Wines, Michael. 1991 Google Scholar. “With No Frills, Bush Chief Signals Changes.” The New York Times, December 6: A1.
Wines, Michael. 1992 Google Scholara. “The 1992 Campaign: White House; Bad Economic News Forces Bush to Refocus Re-election Strategy.” The New York Times, July 4: A1.
Wines, Michael. 1992 Google Scholarb. “The 1992 Campaign: The Republicans; Baker Returns, Bringing Tried-and-True Tactics.” The New York Times, August 24: A1.
Wittenbrink, Bernd, Judd, Charles M., and Park, Bernadette. 1997. “Evidence for Racial Prejudice at the Implicit Level and Its Relationship with Questionnaire Measures.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 Google Scholar(2): 262–274.
Wlezien, Christopher. 2001. “On Forecasting the Presidential Vote.” P.S. Political Science and Politics 34 Google Scholar(1): 24–31.
Wlezien, Christopher, Franklin, Mark, and Twiggs, Daniel. 1997. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity.” Political Behavior 19 Google Scholar(1): 7–17.
Wood, B. Dan. 2007. The Politics of Economic Leadership. Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John. 1998. “Monica Lewinsky's Contribution to Political Science.” P.S. Political Science and Politics 31 Google Scholar: 182–189.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.