Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:02:47.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance and Leadership

The Board as the Nexus of Leadership-in-Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2020

Monique Cikaliuk ,
Ljiljana Eraković ,
Brad Jackson ,
Chris Noonan  and
Susan Watson
Monique Cikaliuk
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Ljiljana Eraković
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Brad Jackson
Affiliation:
University of Waikato, New Zealand
Chris Noonan
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Susan Watson
Affiliation:
University of Auckland

Summary

This Element deals with leadership and governance of corporations from the point of view of the board. We expand our understanding of board leadership by focusing on the modern company as a legal person comprised of a capital fund and the relationships among directors, shareholders, management and stakeholders. We propose a model which integrates insights from the fields of leadership and corporate governance and establishes a theoretical link illustrated by empirical findings in three intersections: team leadership on the board, the chair's leadership of the board, and strategic leadership by the board. We maintain this integrative model provides a powerful means to further an understanding of the board as the nexus of leadership and governance. We close this Element by identifying the new research directions that our integrative model opens up. We also identify the implications for practice for those who either serve on boards or provide support to them.
Get access

Keywords

board of directorscorporate governanceleadershipjurisprudencecorporate regulation
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Corporate Governance
Online ISBN: 9781108895385
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 27 August 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberg, C., Bankewitz, M., Knockaert, M., & Huse, M. (2017). The service tasks of board of directors: A critical literature review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2017(1).Google Scholar
Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P., & Tirole, J. (1997). Formal and real authority in organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 105(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Aguilar, L. A. (2015, October 14). The Important Work of Boards of Directors. Retrieved 12 December 2018, from www.sec.gov/news/speech/important-work-of-boards-of-directors.html.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. L., & Svejenova, S. (2005). Sharing Executive Power: Roles and Relationships at the Top. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. (2017). Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full-range’ theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 76–96.Google Scholar
Armour, J., Black, B., Cheffins, B., & Nolan, R. (2009). Private enforcement of corporate law: An empirical comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6(4), 687–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASIC V. Hellicar, 286 ALR (2012).Google Scholar
Attenborough, D. (2006). The Company Law Reform Bill: An analysis of directors’ duties and the objective of the company. The Company Lawyer, 27(6), 162–9.Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, S. M. (2003). Director Primacy: The means and ends of corporate governance. Northwestern University Law Review, 97(2), 547–606.Google Scholar
Baker, S. (2016, July 12). Theresa May’s Plan to Put Workers on Boards Is Borrowed from Germany and France. Retrieved 11 December 2018, from www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/theresa-may-board-corporate-plan-germany-france-productivity-economics-a7132221.html.Google Scholar
Barratt, R., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (2002). Developing reflexive corporate leadership: The role of the non executive director. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2(3), 32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 751–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207–18.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A. (2013). The myth that insulating boards serves long-term value. Columbia Law Review, 113, 1637–94.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. (1931). Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Review, 44(7), 1049–74.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. (1965). The impact of the corporation on classical economic theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 79(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
Bezemer, P.-J., Nicholson, G., & Pugliese, A. (2018). The influence of board chairs on director engagement: A case-based exploration of boardroom decision-making. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(3), 219–34.Google Scholar
Black, B. S., Cheffins, B. R., & Klausner, M. (2006). Outside director liability: A policy analysis. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 162(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/info:doi/10.1628/093245606776166543.Google Scholar
Blair, M. M. (1995). Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Blair, M. M. (1998). For whom should corporations be run?: An economic rationale for stakeholder management. Long Range Planning, 31(2), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00003-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. A. (1999). A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review, 85(2), 247–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. A. (2001). Director accountability and the mediating role of the corporate board. Washington University Law Quarterly, 79(2), 403–48.Google Scholar
Bolton, P., Brunnermeier, M. K., & Veldkamp, L. (2010). Economists’ perspectives on leadership. In Nohria, N. and Khurana, R., eds, Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press, pp. 239–64.Google Scholar
Bolton, P., Brunnermeier, M. K., & Veldkamp, L. (2012). Leadership, coordination, and corporate culture. Review of Economic Studies, 80(2), 512–37.Google Scholar
Bryman, A., Collinson, D., Grint, K., Jackson, B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (eds). (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Leadership. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. (1997). Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 693–728. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555325.Google Scholar
Carter, C., & Lorsch, J. W. (2004). Back to the Drawing Board: Designing Corporate Boards for a Complex World. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, D. (1965). Influence, leadership, control. In March, J., ed., Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp.1–47.Google Scholar
Casal, C., & Caspar, C. (2014). Building a forward-looking board. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 119–26.Google Scholar
Chait, R. P., Ryan, W. P., & Taylor, B. E. (2005). Governance as Leadership: Reframing the Work of Nonprofit Boards. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cikaliuk, M., Eraković, L., Jackson, B., Noonan, C., & Watson, S. (2018a). Board leadership and governance for clear-sighted CEO succession at Air New Zealand. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.23.Google Scholar
Cikaliuk, M., Eraković, L., Jackson, B., Noonan, C., & Watson, S. (2018b). Leadership in governance: Women board chairs. In Devnew, L., Le Ber, M. J., Torchia, M. and Burke, R. J., eds, More Women on Boards: An International Perspective. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 269–83.Google Scholar
Clark, V. Workman, 1920 IR 1 (1920).Google Scholar
Clarke, T. (2013). Deconstructing the mythology of shareholder value: A comment on Lynn Stout’s ‘The Shareholder Value Myth’. Accounting, Economics, and Law; Berlin, 3(1), 15–42. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/10.1515/ael-2013-0006.Google Scholar
Clarke, T. (2014). Dangerous frontiers in corporate governance. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(03), 268–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.37.Google Scholar
Clarke, T. (2017). International Corporate Governance: A Comparative Approach, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clegg, S., & Bailey, J. R. (2007). International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Conger, J. A., & Lawler, E. E. (2009a). Sharing leadership on corporate boards: A critical requirement for teamwork at the top. Organizational Dynamics, 38(3), 183–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.04.007.Google Scholar
Conger, J. A., & Lawler, E. E. (2009b). Why your board needs a non-executive chair. In Conger, J. A., ed., Boardroom Realities: Building Leaders across Your Board. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 51–67.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th edn. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Dailey, P. R., & Koblentz, J. M. (2012). Refreshing your board of directors – What if you shook up board membership and processes before a crisis strikes? Corporate Board, 33(197), 16–20.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (2006). Best Practice in Corporate Governance: Building Reputation and Sustainable Success. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Davies, P. L., & Worthington, S. (2008). Gower and Davies’ Principles of Company Law, 8th edn. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F. (2016). The Vanishing American Corporation: Navigating the Hazards of a New Economy. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. (2019). The evolution of corporate form: From shareholders property to the corporation as commons. In Clarke, T., O’Brien, J. and O’Kelley, C., eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 687–710.Google Scholar
Deakin, S., Gindis, D., Hodgson, G. M., Huang, K., & Pistor, K. (2017). Legal institutionalism: Capitalism and the constitutive role of law. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.04.005.Google Scholar
Deloitte Development LLC. (2016). Board Effectiveness: A Focus on Behavior. Retrieved 4 December 2018, from www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/center-for-board-effectiveness/articles/board-effectiveness-a-focus-on-behavior.html.Google Scholar
Dewan, T., & Myatt, D. P. (2008). The qualities of leadership: Direction, communication, and obfuscation. American Political Science Review, 102(3), 351–68.Google Scholar
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., et al. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62.Google Scholar
Dodd, E. M. Jr (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review, 45(7), 1145–63.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1996). The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ees, H. van, Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2009). Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 307–19.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, M. A. (1989). The structure of corporation law. Columbia Law Review, 89(7), 1461–525.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
Engelen, A., Gupta, V., Strenger, L., & Brettel, M. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation, firm performance, and the moderating role of transformational leadership behaviors. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1069–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455244.Google Scholar
Erakovic, L., & Jackson, B. (2012). Promoting leadership in governance and governance in leadership: Towards a supportive research agenda. In Davila, A., Elvira, M. M., Ramirez, J. and Zapata-Cantu, L., eds, Understanding Organizations in Complex, Emergent and Uncertain Environments. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026088_4.Google Scholar
Esser, I., & du Plessis, J. J. (2007). The stakeholder debate and directors’ fiduciary duties. South African Mercantile Law Journal, 19(3), 346–63.Google Scholar
Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 113–35.Google Scholar
Ferreira, D., & Rezende, M. (2007). Corporate strategy and information disclosure. The RAND Journal of Economics, 38(1), 164–84.Google Scholar
Fhr European Ventures Llp v. Cedar Capital Partners LLC, 2014 UKSC (2014).Google Scholar
Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior, and corporate social responsibility: Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 289–306.Google Scholar
Filatotchev, I., Toms, S., & Wright, M. (2006). The firm’s strategic dynamics and corporate governance life-cycle. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2(4), 256–79.Google Scholar
Financial Reporting Council. (2018). The UK Corporate Governance Code. Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved 12 March 2020 from www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/59a5171d-4163-4fb2-9e9d-daefcd7153b5/UK-Corporate-Governance-Code-2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2003). Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(2), 101–13. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.10025204.Google Scholar
Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pittman Books.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Zyglidopoulos, S. (2018). Stakeholder Theory: Concepts and Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D., ed., Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, pp.150–67.Google Scholar
Fulham Football Club Ltd v. Cabra Estates plc, 1994 BCLC 1 (1994).Google Scholar
Gabrielsson, J., Huse, M., & Minichilli, A. (2007). Understanding the leadership role of the board chairperson through a team production approach. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 21–39.Google Scholar
Gardner, W. L., Lowe, K. B., Moss, T. W., Mahoney, K. T., & Cogliser, C. C. (2010). Scholarly leadership of the study of leadership: A review of The Leadership Quarterly’s second decade, 2000–2009. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 922–58.Google Scholar
Gautier, A. (2002). Men behaving badly. New Zealand Management, 49(4), 26–31.Google Scholar
Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 654–81.Google Scholar
Gervais, S., & Goldstein, I. (2007). The positive effects of biased self-perceptions in firms. Review of Finance, 11(3), 453–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibby, T. (2016, June 14). Effective Board Leadership Is Like … Retrieved 4 December 2018, from www.boardeffect.com/blog/effective-board-leadership-is-like/.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. (2000). The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 245–57.Google Scholar
Goel, A. M., & Thakor, A. V. (2008). Overconfidence, CEO selection, and corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2737–84.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2007). Myths and reality. Canadian Business, 80(16/17), 60–3.Google Scholar
Gunasekara, G. (2013). Privacy as a stakeholder interest in New Zealand: Transparency in corporate governance practices. New Zealand Business Law Quarterly, 19(4), 271–94.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97–124.Google Scholar
Harrison, Y. D., & Murray, V. (2012). Perspectives on the leadership of chairs of nonprofit organization boards of directors: A grounded theory mixed-method study. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(4), 411–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21038.Google Scholar
Heenan, D. A., & Bennis, W. (1999). Co-Leaders: The Power of Great Partnerships. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hendry, K. P., Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. (2010). How boards strategise: A strategy as practice view. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.09.005.Google Scholar
Hermalin, B. E. (1998). Toward an economic theory of leadership: Leading by example. The American Economic Review, 88(5), 1188–206.Google Scholar
Hermalin, B. E. (2007). Leading for the long term. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Holloway, D. A., & van Rhyn, D. (2005). Effective corporate governance reform and organisational pluralism: Reframing culture, leadership and followership. In Lehman, C., ed., Corporate Governance: Does Any Size Fit? Vol. 11. Amsterdam: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 303–28.Google Scholar
Howard Smith Ltd v. Ampol Petroleum Ltd, 1974 AC (1974).Google Scholar
Huck, S., & Rey-Biel, P. (2006). Endogenous leadership in teams. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 162(2), 253–61. https://doi.org/DOI:info:doi/10.1628/093245606777583495.Google Scholar
Hung, H. (2011). Directors’ roles in corporate social responsibility: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0870-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huse, M. (1994). Board-management relations in small firms: The paradox of simultaneous independence and interdependence. Small Business Economics, 6(1), 55–72.Google Scholar
Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16(s1), S65–S79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00448.x.Google Scholar
Huse, M. (2007). Boards, Governance and Value Creation: The Human Side of Corporate Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huse, M. (ed.). (2009). The Value Creating Board: Corporate Governance and Organizational Behaviour. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huse, M. (2018). Value-creating boards: Challenges for future research and practice. In Clarke, T., ed., Cambridge Elements in Corporate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564786.Google Scholar
Huse, M., & Gabrielsson, J. (2012). Board leadership and value creation: An extended team production approach. In Clarke, T. and Branson, D. M., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 233–52. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200995.n12.Google Scholar
Huse, M., Gabrielsson, J., & Minichilli, A. (2009). How board contribute to value creation. In Huse, M., ed., The Value Creating Board: Corporate Governance and Organizational Behaviour. New York: Routledge, pp. 523–32.Google Scholar
Huse, M., & Rindova, V. P. (2001). Stakeholders’ expectations of board roles: The case of subsidiary boards. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(2), 153–78.Google Scholar
Huse, M., & Zattoni, A. (2008). Trust, firm life cycle, and actual board behavior: Evidence from ‘one of the lads’ in the board of three small firms. International Studies of Management & Organization, 38(3), 71–97.Google Scholar
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1159–75.Google Scholar
In Re Smith and Fawcett Ltd, 1942 Ch (1942).Google Scholar
In Re Westmid Packing Services Ltd, 1998 All ER 2 (1998).Google Scholar
Ingley, C., Rennie, M., Mueller, J., et al. (2011). Reformed and engaged boards–not activist shareholders. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 7(3), 302–29. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2011.040811.Google Scholar
Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators & The Investment Association. (2017). The Stakeholder Voice in Board Decision Making: Strengthening the Business, Promoting Long-Term Success. London:Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators & The Investment Association. Retrieved 12 March 2020, from www.icsa.org.uk/assets/files/free-guidance-notes/the-stakeholder-voice-in-Board-Decision-Making-09-2017.pdf.Google Scholar
Institute of Corporate Directors, Canada. (2015). Beyond Term Limits: Using Performance Management to Guide Board Renewal. Retrieved 12 December 2018, from www.icd.ca/getmedia/e57f3478-2b5c-4f14-aad4-5aa8d6a7298d/15-1889-Beyond_Term_Limits_EN_Final.pdf.aspx.Google Scholar
International Integrated Reporting Council. (2018). Get to Grips with the Six Capitals. Retrieved 5 April 2018, from https://integratedreporting.org/what-the-tool-for-better-reporting/get-to-grips-with-the-six-capitals/.Google Scholar
Jackson, B., & Parry, K. (2018). A Very Short Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Studying Leadership, 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. (2001). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7(3), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-036X.00158.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–60.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–68.Google Scholar
Jung, D. I., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 949–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1379(200012)21:8<949::aid-job64>3.0.CO;2-F.Google Scholar
Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2002). Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research, 33(3), 313–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/10496402033003002.Google Scholar
Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N. K., & Barratt, R. (2006). Chairman and chief executive officer (CEO): That sacred and secret relationship. Journal of Management Development, 25(2), 134–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaler, J. (2003). Differentiating stakeholder theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024794710899.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A., & Englander, E. (2005). A team production model of corporate governance. The Academy of Management Executive, 19(3), 9–22.Google Scholar
Khanna, P., Jones, C. D., & Boivie, S. (2014). Director human capital, information processing demands, and board effectiveness. Journal of Management, 40(2), 557–85.Google Scholar
Klarner, P., Yoshikawa, T., & Hitt, M. A. (2018). A capability-based view of boards: A new conceptual framework for board governance. Academy of Management Perspectives, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0030.Google Scholar
Knippenberg, D. van, & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic – transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60.Google Scholar
Knoll, M. S. (2018). The Modigliani–Miller theorem at 60: The long-overlooked legal applications of finance’s foundational theorem. Yale Journal on Regulation Bulletin, 36, 1–21.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H., & Suehiro, H. (2005). Emergence of leadership in teams. The Japanese Economic Review, 56(3), 295–316.Google Scholar
Kocourek, P., Burger, C., & Birchard, B. (2003). Hard facts: Soft behaviours. New Zealand Management, 50(7), 68–9.Google Scholar
Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2009). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35(4), 981–1006.Google Scholar
Kortmann, S., & Piller, F. (2016). Open business models and closed-loop value chains: Redefining the firm-consumer relationship. California Management Review, 58(3), 88–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., et al. (2017). The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R., eds, The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 243–75.Google Scholar
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.Google Scholar
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Leblanc, R. (2005). Assessing board leadership. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(5), 654–66.Google Scholar
Leblanc, R., & Gillies, J. (2005). Inside the Boardroom: How Boards Really Work and the Coming Revolution in Corporate Governance. Mississauga, Ontario Canada: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Letza, S., Sun, X., & Kirkbride, J. (2004). Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 12(3), 242–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00367.x.Google Scholar
Levrau, A., & van den Berghe, L. (2013). Perspectives on the decision-making style of the board chair. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 10(2), 105–21.Google Scholar
Lim, E. (2015). Contracting out of fiduciary duties. Common Law World Review, 44(4), 276–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779515616035.Google Scholar
Lorsch, J. W. (2009). Leadership: The key to effective boards. In Conger, J. A., ed., Boardroom Realities: Building Leaders Across Your Board. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 25–50.Google Scholar
Lorsch, J. W. (2017). Understanding boards of directors: A systems perspective. Annals of Corporate Governance, 2(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1561/109.00000006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorsch, J. W., & Clark, R. C. (2008). Leading from the boardroom. Harvard Business Review, 86(4), 104–11.Google Scholar
Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Lynall, M. D., Golden, B. R., & Hillman, A. J. (2003). Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 416–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machold, S., & Farquhar, S. (2013). Board task evolution: A longitudinal field study in the UK: Board task evolution. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 147–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12017.Google Scholar
Machold, S., Huse, M., Minichilli, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2011). Board leadership and strategy involvement in small firms: A team production approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 368–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00852.x.Google Scholar
Madoff Securities International Ltd v. Raven, 2013 EWHC (2013).Google Scholar
Maharaj, R. (2008). Critiquing and contrasting ‘moral’ stakeholder theory and ‘strategic’ stakeholder: Implications for the board of directors. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 8(2), 115–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700810863751.Google Scholar
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M. L., Khanna, P., & Westphal, J. D. (2008). Getting them to think outside the circle: Corporate governance, CEOs’ external advice networks, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 453–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.32625969.Google Scholar
McGregor, L. (2000). The Human Face of Corporate Governance. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. (1999). Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20(1), 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840699201003.Google Scholar
McNulty, T., Pettigrew, A., Jobome, G., & Morris, C. (2011). The role, power and influence of company chairs. Journal of Management & Governance, 15(1), 91–121.Google Scholar
Mehra, A., Smith, B. R., Dixon, A. L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 232–45.Google Scholar
Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v. Securities Commission, 1995 AC 2 (1995).Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2012). Board task performance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.743.Google Scholar
Moore, M. T. (2014). Private ordering and public policy: The paradoxical foundations of corporate contractarianism. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34(4), 693–728. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu006.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of Organizations, 2nd edn. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Nicholson, G., Pugliese, A., & Bezemer, P.-J. (2017). Habitual accountability routines in the boardroom: How boards balance control and collaboration. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(2), 222–46.Google Scholar
Nicholson, G. J., Alexander, M., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). Defining the social capital of the board of directors: An exploratory study. Journal of Management & Organization, 10(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200004612.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B. (1996). Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organization Studies, 17(6), 985–1011.Google Scholar
Official Receiver v. Watson, 2008 EWHC (2008).Google Scholar
O’Toole, J., Galbraith, J., & Lawler III, E. E. (2002). When two (or more) heads are better than one: The promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. California Management Review, 44(4), 65–83.Google Scholar
Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). All those years ago: The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In Pearce, C. L. and Conger, J. A., eds, Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Pearce, C. L., Conger, J. A., & Locke, E. A. (2008). Shared leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 622–8.Google Scholar
Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2000). Shared leadership: Toward a multi-level theory of leadership. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams. Vol. 7. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 115–39.Google Scholar
Perrault, E., & McHugh, P. (2015). Toward a life cycle theory of board evolution: Considering firm legitimacy. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(5), 627–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.92.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13(Special Issue), 163–82.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M., & McNulty, T. (1995). Power and influence in and around the boardroom. Human Relations, 48(8), 845–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800802.Google Scholar
Plessis, J. J. du (2016). Shareholder primacy and other stakeholder interests. Company and Securities Law Journal, 34, 238–42.Google Scholar
Plessis, J. J. du (2017). Corporate social responsibility and contemporary community expectations. Company and Securities Law Journal, 35, 30–47.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 79–90.Google Scholar
Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P-J., Zattoni, A., et al. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00740.x.Google Scholar
Pye, A. (2002). Corporate directing: Governing, strategising and leading in action. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10(3), 153–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00280.Google Scholar
Ravasi, D., & Zattoni, A. (2006). Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy: A study of mixed-ownership institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1671–702.Google Scholar
Robé, J-P. (2011). The legal structure of the firm. Accounting, Economics, and Law, 1(1), 1–86.Google Scholar
Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16(S1), S5–S26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00444.x.Google Scholar
Roberts, J., & Stiles, P. (1999). The relationship between chairmen and chief executives: Competitive or complementary roles? Long Range Planning, 32(1), 36–48.Google Scholar
Rost, J. C. (1993). Leadership for the Twenty-First Century. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Rotemberg, J. J., & Saloner, G. (1993). Leadership style and incentives. Management Science, 39(11), 1299–318.Google Scholar
Sally, D. (2002). Co-leadership: Lessons from republican Rome. California Management Review, 44(4), 84–99.Google Scholar
Salomon’s Case, 1897 AC (1897).Google Scholar
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–58.Google Scholar
Siciliano, J. I. (2005). Board involvement in strategy and organisational performance. Journal of General Management, 30(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630700503000401.Google Scholar
Sjåfjell, B. (2016). Achieving corporate sustainability: What is the role of the shareholder? In Birkmose, H. S., ed., Shareholders’ Duties. Vol. 12 of European Company Law Series. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, pp.377–404.Google Scholar
SpencerStuart. (2018). 2018 U.S. Spencer Stuart Board Index. Retrieved 12 December 2018, from https://www.spencerstuart.com/-/media/2018/december/ukbi2018_8b.pdf.Google Scholar
Steen, E. van den (2005). Organizational beliefs and managerial vision. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 21(1), 256–83.Google Scholar
Stiles, P., & Taylor, B. (2001). Boards at Work: How Directors View Their Roles and Responsibilities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stout, L. A. (2012). The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations, and the Public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Strine, L. E. Jr (2014). Can we do better by ordinary investors: A pragmatic reaction to the dueling ideological mythologists of corporate law. Columbia Law Review, 114, 449–502.Google Scholar
Summers, R. S. (1968). ‘Good faith’ in general contract law and the sales provisions of the uniform commercial code. Virginia Law Review, 54(2), 195–267.Google Scholar
Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415.Google Scholar
Thorby v. Goldberg, 112 CLR (1964).Google Scholar
Thorpe, R., Gold, J., & Lawler, J. (2011). Locating distributed leadership. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 239–50.Google Scholar
Tourish, D. (2013). The Dark Side of Transformational Leadership: A Critical Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tricker, B. (1994). International Corporate Governance: Text, Readings, and Cases. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tricker, B. (2000). Corporate governance – the subject whose time has come. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8(4), 289–96.Google Scholar
Useem, M., Carey, D., & Charan, R. (2016). Board That Lead. In Leblanc, R., ed., The Handbook of Board Governance: A Comprehensive Guide for Public, Private and Not for Profit Board Members. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 26–45.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., Sonenshein, S., & Boje, D. (2016). Narratives as sources of stability and change in organizations: Approaches and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 495–560.Google Scholar
Vandewaerde, M., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F., & Bammens, Y. (2011). Board team leadership revisited: A conceptual model of shared leadership in the boardroom. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 403–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0918-6.Google Scholar
Vasudev, P. M. (2012). Corporate stakeholders in New Zealand – The present, and possibilities for the future. New Zealand Business Law Quarterly, 18(2), 167–80.Google Scholar
Vasudev, P. M. (2013). Corporate stakeholders in Canada – An overview and a proposal. Ottawa Law Review, 45(1), 137–80.Google Scholar
Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 223–70.Google Scholar
Watson, S. (2015). How the company became an entity: A new understanding of corporate law. Journal of Business Law, 120, 1–24.Google Scholar
Watson, S. (2018). The corporate legal person. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2018.1435951.Google Scholar
Weinstein, O. (2013). The shareholder model of the corporation, between mythology and reality. Accounting, Economics and Law, 3(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2013-0032.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (2013). A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 607–61.Google Scholar
Wilson, S., Cummings, S., Jackson, B., & Proctor-Thomson, S. (2018). Revitalising or revolutionising? Leadership scholarship. In Revitalising Leadership: Putting Theory and Practice into Context. London: Routledge, pp.181–96.Google Scholar
Yar Hamidi, D., & Gabrielsson, J. (2014a). Developments and trends in research on board leadership: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 9(3), 243–68. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2014.064739.Google Scholar
Yar Hamidi, D., & Gabrielsson, J. (2014b). Board Chairmanship and Innovation in Growth Oriented Firms: Opening Up the Black box Of Leadership in the Boardroom. Presented at the EURAM conference, Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in Organizations, 8th edn. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & Filatotchev, I. (2004). Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 885–97.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & Newey, L. R. (2009). Maximizing the impact of organization science: Theory-building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1059–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00848.x.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334.Google Scholar
Zupan, M. A. (2010). An economic perspective on leadership. In Nohria, N. and Khurana, R., eds. Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice. Boston: Harvard Business Press, pp. 265–90.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Corporate Governance and Leadership
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Corporate Governance and Leadership
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Corporate Governance and Leadership
Available formats
×