Element contents
Series: Elements in Ethics
The Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2024
Summary
This Element surveys the main claims of Bernard Williams's ethical philosophy. Topics include ethical scepticism, virtue, reasons for action, the critique of the Morality System, moral realism and the nature of theorising in ethics.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in EthicsOnline ISBN: 9781108580953Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 21 November 2024
References
Primary Sources
Williams, Bernard Morality: An Introduction to Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1973a) Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–197 (Cambridge University Press, 1973a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1973b) Utilitarianism: For and Against, (by Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, Bernard) (Cambridge University Press, 1973b).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980 (Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard Making Sense of Humanity, and Other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993 (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument (Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, edited by Moore, A. W. (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard The Sense of the Past: Essays in the History of Philosophy, edited by Burnyeat, Myles (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Williams, (1988) ‘The Structure of Hare’s Theory’, in Seanor, Douglas and Fotion, N. (eds.) Hare and Critics: Essays on Moral Thinking, Clarendon Press, pp.76–85.Google Scholar
Williams, (1995a) ‘How Free Does the Will Need to Be?’, Making Sense of Humanity, pp.3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, (1995b) ‘Voluntary Act and Responsible Agents’, Making Sense of Humanity, pp.22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, (1995c) ‘Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame’, Making Sense of Humanity, pp.35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, (1995e) ‘Acts and Omissions, Doing and Not Doing’, Making Sense of Humanity, pp.56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, (1995f) ‘Nietzsche’s Minimalist Moral Psychology’, Making Sense of Humanity, pp.65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, (1995g) ‘The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and the Ambitions of Ethics’, Making Sense of Humanity, pp.153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, (1995h) ‘Who Needs Ethical Knowledge?’, Making Sense of Humanity, pp.203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, (1995j) ‘Moral Luck: A Postscript’, Making Sense of Humanity, pp.241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, (1995k) ‘Replies’ in Altham, J. E. J. and Harrison, T. R. (eds.) World, Mind and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, Cambridge University Press, pp.185–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, (2016) ‘The Need to be Sceptical’ in Essays and Reviews: 1959–2002, Princeton University Press, pp.311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altham, J. E. J. and Harrison, T. R. (eds.) (1995) World, Mind and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958) ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, Philosophy, vol.33, no.124, pp.1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bales, Eugene (1971) ‘Act Utilitarianism: Account of Right-Making Characteristics or Decision Making Procedure?’, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol.8, no.3, pp.257–265.Google Scholar
Cottingham, John (1997) ‘The Ethical Credentials of Partiality’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, pp.1–21.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2009) The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect and Accountability, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, Stephen (2009) ‘The Obscurity of Internal Reasons’, Philosophers Imprint, vol.9, no.7, pp.1–22.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa (1978) ‘Are Moral Considerations Overriding?’, reprinted in Virtues and Vices, Blackwell, pp.181–189.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa (1983) ‘Utilitarianism and the Virtues’, Proceedings and Addresses of the APA, vol.57, no.2, pp.273–283.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda (2000) ‘Confidence and Irony’ in Harcourt, Edward (ed.) Morality, Reflection and Ideology, Oxford University Press, pp.87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Ned (2004) ‘Two Concepts of Causation’, in Collins, John, Hall, Ned, and Paul, Laurie (eds.) Causation and Counterfactuals, MIT Press, pp.225–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. (1981) Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer (2008) ‘A Disjunctive Conception of Acting for Reasons’, in Haddock, Adrian and Macpherson, Fiona (eds.) Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, Oxford University Press, pp.244–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Paul (2006) ‘Does Consequentialism Make Too Many Demands, or None at All?’, Ethics, vol.116, no.4, pp.680–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Paul (2017) ‘Why Consequentialism’s Compelling Idea Is Not’, Social Theory and Practice, vol.43, no.1, pp.29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (2016) Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning and Narrative, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John (1985) ‘Values and Secondary Qualities’ in Honderich, Ted (ed.) Morality and Objectivity, Routledge, pp.110–129.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1861/1998) ‘Of the Ultimate Sanction of the Principle of Utility’ in Crisp, Roger (ed.) Utilitarianism, Oxford University Press, pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Moore, A. W. (2007) ‘Realism and the Absolute Conception’ in Thomas, Alan (ed.) Bernard Williams, pp.24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. W. (2003) ‘Williams on Ethics, Knowledge and Reflection’, Philosophy, vol.78, no.305, pp. 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (1995) ‘Aristotle on Human Nature and the Foundations of Ethics’, in Altham, J. E. J. and Harrison, T. R. (eds.) pp.86–131.Google Scholar
Piper, Adrian S. (1987) ‘Moral Theory and Moral Alienation’, Journal of Philosophy, vol.84, no.2, pp.102–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Mark (2005) ‘Sartre, Strawson and Others’, Inquiry, vol.48, no.3, pp.275–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul (1956) Being and Nothingness, trans. Hazel Barnes, Washington Square Books.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas (2014) Being Realistic about Reasons, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter (1972) ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 229–243.Google Scholar
Skorupski, John (2007) ‘Internal Reasons and the Scope of Blame’, in Thomas, Alan (ed), Williams, Bernard, pp. 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. (1971) ‘Meaning and Truth’, in Logic-Linguistic Papers, Methuen, pp. 170–189.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry (2011) ‘Practical Reasoning’ in Philosophers Past and Present, Oxford University Press, pp.207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1976) ‘Responsibility for Self’ in Rorty, Amelie (ed.) The Identities of Persons, University of California Press, pp. 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Alan (2002) ‘Internal Reasons and Contractualist Impartiality’, Utilitas, vol.14, no.2, pp.135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Alan (2005) ‘Reasonable Partiality and the Agent’s Personal Point of View’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 8, no. 1/2, pp. 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Alan (2006) Value and Context: The Nature of Moral and Political Knowledge, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Alan (ed.) (2007) Bernard Williams: Contemporary Philosophy in Focus, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Alan (2010) ‘Alienation, Objectivity and the Primacy of Virtue’ in Webber, Jonathan (ed.) Reading Sartre, Routledge, pp.161–179.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alan (2011) ‘Another Particularism: Reasons, Status and Defaults’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol.14, no.2, pp.151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Alan (2015) ‘Integrity, Ground Projects and Reasons to Be Moral’, in Himmelmann, Beatrix and Louden, Robert (eds.) Why Be Moral? De Gruyter, pp.249–271.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alan (2017) ‘Rawls and Political Realism’, European Journal of Political Theory, vol.16, no.3, pp.304–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Alan (2019) ‘Does Epistemic Injustice Involve “Corrective Virtue”?’ in LeBar, Mark (ed.) Becoming Virtuous: Justice, Oxford University Press, pp.209–236.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alan (2024) ‘Virtue, Authenticity and Irony: Themes from Sartre and Williams’, Topoi. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09985-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth (2005) ‘Kant, Hegel and Determining Our Duties’, Annual Review of Law and Ethics, no.13, pp.335–354.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter (1965) ‘The Universalisability of Moral Judgement’, The Monist, vol.49, no.2, pp.196–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by