Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T17:35:35.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Problem of God in Thomas Reid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2025

James Foster
Affiliation:
University of Sioux Falls

Summary

Thomas Reid was a theist and a philosopher; yet the exact relationship between philosophy and theology in his works is unclear and disputed. The aim of this book is to clarify this relationship along three lines by exploring the status, function, and detachability of theism with respect to Reid's philosophy. Regarding the first I argue that belief in the existence of God is, for Reid, a non-inferential first principle. Regarding the second I argue that theism plays at least six different roles in Reid's philosophy. And, regarding the third, I argue that, despite this, theism is largely detachable from Reid's concept of human rationality and philosophy. What emerges is a picture of the relationship between philosophy and theology in which both inquiries are motivated by natural human curiosity, and both are founded on principles of common sense.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781009270564
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 06 February 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahnert, Thomas (2014) The Moral Culture of the Scottish Enlightenment, 1690–1805. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (The Lewis Walpole Series in Eighteenth-Century Culture and History).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (2002) The New Organon. Edited by Jardine, L. and Silverthorne, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy).Google Scholar
Barrett, Justin L. (2004) Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Buras, Todd (2021) “Revisiting Reid on Religion,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 19(3), pp. 261274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callergård, Robert (2010) “Thomas Reid’s Newtonian Theism: His Differences with the Classical Arguments of Richard Bentley and William Whiston,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41, pp. 109118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvin, John (1960) Institutes of the Christian Religion (2 Vol). Edited by McNeil, John T.. Translated by Ford L. Battles. Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press (Library of Christian Classics, XX).Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Rebecca (2015) “Thomas Reid on Aesthetic Perception,” in Copenhaver, Rebecca and Buras, Todd (eds.) Thomas Reid on Mind, Knowledge, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Mind Association Occasional Series), pp. 124138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Rebecca and Buras, Todd (eds.) (2015) Thomas Reid on Mind, Knowledge, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Mind Association Occasional Series).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuneo, Terence (2020) Thomas Reid on the Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Elements in Ethics).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Norman (1974) Thomas Reid’s Inquiry: The Geometry of Visibles and the Case for Realism. New York: B. Franklin.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman (1989) Thomas Reid’s Inquiry: The Geometry of Visibles and the Case for Realism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, Allan Wade (1987) “Reid’s Indebtedness to Bacon,” The Monist, 70(4), pp. 496507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, William C. (2006) Thomas Reid’s Ethics: Moral Epistemology on Legal Foundations. New York: Continuum (Continuum Studies in British Philosophy).Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1993) Meditations on First Philosophy. Third. Translated by D. A. Cress. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Di Ceglie, Roberto (2020) “Thomas Reid: Philosophy, Science, and the Christian Revelation,” Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 18(1), pp. 1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faurot, J. H. (1952) “The Development of Reid’s Theory of Knowledge,” University of Toronto Quarterly, 21(3), pp. 224231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, James J. S. (2017) Thomas Reid on Religion. Exeter: Imprint Academic (Library of Scottish Philosophy).Google Scholar
Foster, James J. S. (2024) Thomas Reid and the Defence of Duty. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (Edinburgh Studies in Scottish Philosophy).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Alexander Campbell (1898) Thomas Reid. Edinburgh: Oliphant Anderson (Famous Scots). https://archive.org/details/thomasreid00frasuoft.Google Scholar
Greco, John (2004) “Reid’s Reply to the Skeptic,” in Cuneo, Terence and Woudenberg, René van (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Companions to Philosophy). pp. 134155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, James A. (2010) “Reid on Hume on Justice,” in Roeser, S. (ed.) Reid on Ethics. London: Palgrave MacMillan (Philosophers in Depth), pp. 204222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David (1978) A Treatise of Human Nature. 2nd ed. Edited by Selby-Bigge, Lewis A. and Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. (1997) Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Edited by Selby-Bigge, Lewis A. and Nidditch, Peter H.. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1998) Principal Writings on Religion including Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and the Natural History of Religion. Edited by Gaskin, John C. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Oxford World’s Classics).Google Scholar
Jaffro, Laurent (2015) “Reid on Aesthetic Response and the Perception of Beauty,” in Copenhaver, Rebecca and Buras, Todd (eds.) Thomas Reid on Mind, Knowledge, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Mind Association Occasional Series), pp. 161177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeker, Esther (2011) “Reid’s Moral Psychology: Animal Motives as Guides to Virtue,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 41(S1: New Essays on Reid), pp. 122141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeker, Esther (2024) “Perceiving Design? Reid’s Design Discourse,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 62(2), pp. 239262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinlay, Jr., James (1843) “Memoir of the Rev. James Mackinlay, D. D.,” in James Mackinlay, Select Sermons. With a Memoir by His Son; and Published under His Superintendence. Kilmarnock, Glasgow and Edinburgh, pp. 963.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James (1846) “Dissertation on the Progress of History,” in Mackintosh, Robert J. (ed.) The Miscellaneous Works of the Right Honorable Sir James Mackintosh: Three Volumes Complete in One. Philadelphia, PA: Carey & Hart, pp. 94197.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (2016) The Principia: The Authoritative Translation and Guide: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by I. Bernard Cohen, Whitman, Anne, and Budenz, Julia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Ryan and Yaffe, Gideon (2023) “Thomas Reid,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/reid/.Google Scholar
Paley, William (1802) Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. Philadelphia, PA: John Morgan.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1983) “Reason and Belief in God,” in Plantinga, Alvin and Wolterstorff, Nicholas (eds.) Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 1693.Google Scholar
Poore, Gregory S. (2015) “Theism, Coherence, and Justification in Thomas Reid’s Epistemology,” in Copenhaver, Rebecca and Buras, Todd (eds.) Thomas Reid on Mind, Knowledge, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Mind Association Occasional Series), pp. 213231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1980) The High Road to Pyrrhonism. Edited by Watson, Richard A. and Force, James E.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (1990) Practical Ethics: Being Lectures and Papers on Natural Religion, Self-Government, Natural Jurisprudence, and the Law of Nations. Edited by Haakonssen, Knud. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (1995) Thomas Reid on Animate Creation. Edited by Wood, Paul B.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (The Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid, 1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2002a) Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edited by Brookes, Derek R.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (The Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid, 3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2002b) The Correspondence of Thomas Reid. Edited by Wood, Paul B.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (The Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid, 4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2003) An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. Second. Edited by Brookes, Derek R.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (The Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid, 2).Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2004) Thomas Reid on Logic, Rhetoric and Fine Arts. Edited by Broadie, Alexander. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (The Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid, 5).Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2007) Thomas Reid on Practical Ethics. Edited by Haakonssen, Knud. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (The Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid, 6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2010) Essays on the Active Powers of Man. Edited by Haakonssen, Knud and Harris, J. A.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (The Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid, 7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2017) Thomas Reid on Mathematics and Natural Philosophy. Edited by Wood, Paul B.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid, 9).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2021) Thomas Reid and the University. Edited by Wood, Paul B.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (The Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid, 10).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeser, Sabine (ed.) (2010) Reid on Ethics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan (Philosophers in depth).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, William L. (1991) Thomas Reid on Freedom and Morality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rysiew, Patrick (2002) “Reid and Epistemic Naturalism,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 52(209), pp. 437456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sextus Empiricus (2000) Outlines of Scepticism. Translated by Julia Annas and Jonathan Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy).Google Scholar
Sher, Richard (2015) Church and University in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Moderate Literati of Edinburgh. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (Edinburgh Classic Editions).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrock, Christopher A. (2017) Thomas Reid and the Problem of Secondary Qualities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (Edinburgh Studies in Scottish Philosophy).Google Scholar
Somerville, James (1995) The Enigmatic Parting Shot. Aldershot: Avebury Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest (2009) Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, Sir Leslie (1902) History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century. 3rd ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. Alexander (2004) “Rational Religion and Common Sense,” in Houston, J. (ed.) Thomas Reid: Context, Influence, Significance. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press, pp. 123160.Google Scholar
Tuggy, Dale (2004) “Reid’s Philosophy of Religion,” in Cuneo, Terence and van Woudenberg, René (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Companions to Philosophy), pp. 289312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleve, James (2015) Problems from Reid. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas (2001) Thomas Reid and the Story of Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Modern European Philosophy).Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas (2004) “God and Darkness in Reid,” in Houston, Joseph (ed.) Thomas Reid: Context, Influence, Significance. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press, pp. 77102.Google Scholar
Wood, Paul (forthcoming) The Life of Thomas Reid. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2015) “Thomas Reid’s Expressivist Ethics,” in Copenhaver, Rebecca and Buras, Todd (eds.) Thomas Reid on Mind, Knowledge, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Mind Association Occasional Series), pp. 139160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Problem of God in Thomas Reid
  • James Foster, University of Sioux Falls
  • Online ISBN: 9781009270564
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Problem of God in Thomas Reid
  • James Foster, University of Sioux Falls
  • Online ISBN: 9781009270564
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Problem of God in Thomas Reid
  • James Foster, University of Sioux Falls
  • Online ISBN: 9781009270564
Available formats
×