Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:26:32.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Public Policy

Truth and Post-Truth in Public Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2021

Frank Fischer
Frank Fischer
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Summary

The phenomenon of post-truth poses a problem for the public policy-oriented sciences, including policy analysis. Along with “fake news,” the post-truth denial of facts constitutes a major concern for numerous policy fields. Whereas a standard response is to call for more and better factual information, this Element shows that the effort to understand this phenomenon has to go beyond the emphasis on facts to include an understanding of the social meanings that get attached to facts in the political world of public policy. The challenge is thus seen to be as much about a politics of meaning as it is about epistemology. The analysis here supplements the examination of facts with an interpretive policy-analytic approach to gain a fuller understanding of post-truth. The importance of the interpretive perspective is illustrated by examining the policy arguments that have shaped policy controversies related to climate change and coronavirus denial.
Get access

Keywords

truthpost-truthpolicy sciencesknowledgesocial meaningvaluesargumentsclimate denialCOVID-19 policyinterpretive policy analysis
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Public Policy
Online ISBN: 9781108854344
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 09 December 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, S. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, B. B. (2017). Second Only to Nuclear War: Science and the Making of Existential Threat in Global Climate Governance. International Studies Quarterly, 61 809–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Tamimi, K. (2016). Evaluating Narrative Arguments. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84725259.pdfGoogle Scholar
Andersen, K. (2017). How American Lost its Mind. The Atlantic. December 18.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. A. (1978). The Logic of Public Problems: Evaluation in Comparative Policy Research. In Ashford, D. E., ed., Comparing Public Policies: New Concepts and Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, pp. 19–42.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (2020). She Hunts Viral Rumors about Real Viruses. New York Times. October 13.Google Scholar
Arantani, L. (2020). They’re Rooting for the Coronavirus: Trump Allies Attack Democrats and the Media. The Guardian. March 5. www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/05/theyre-rooting-for-the-coronavirus-trump-allies-attack-democrats-and-the-mediaGoogle Scholar
Archer, M., Bhaskar, R. Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. eds. (1998). Critical Realism: Essential Readings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1972). Crisis of the Republic. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1991). On Rhetoric: Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by Kennedy, G. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J. and Warren, M. eds. (2018). Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. (2020). Dishonesty Has Defined Trump Presidency: The Consequences Could Be Lasting. New York Times. November 1. www.nytimes.com/2020/11/01/us/politics/trump-presidency-dishonesty.html?referringSource=articleShareGoogle Scholar
Ball, J. (2017). Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World. London/Hull: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
Ball, P. (2020). Anti-Vaccination Movement Could Undermine Efforts to End Coronavirus Pandemic, Experts Warn. Nature. May 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, L. and Livingston, S. (2018). The Disinformation Order: Disruptive Communication and the Decline of Democratic Institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33 (2): 122–139.Google Scholar
Bennett, L. W. and Livingston, S. eds. (2021). The Disinformation Age. Politics, Technology, and Disruptive Communication in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. (2006). Between Relativism and Fundamentalism. The American Interest 2(1).Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1965). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Berube, M. (2011). The Science Wars Redux, Democracy Journal, Winter (19): 64–74.Google Scholar
Best, J. (2012). Damned Lies and Statistics: Untangling Numbers. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokat-Lindell, S. 2021. Can the Unvaccinated be Persuaded? New York Times. August 3.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. (2011). On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bommel, S., Hulst, M., and Yanow, D. (2020). Interpretive Policy Analysis in the Netherlands. In van Nispen, F. and Scholten, P., eds., Policy Analysis and Evaluation in the Netherlands: Institutionalization and Performance, p. 69–81.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cann, H. and Raymond, L. (2018). Does Climate Denialism Still Matter? The Prevalence of Alternative Frames in Opposition to Climate Policy. Environmental Politics, 27 (3): 1–22.Google Scholar
Chotiner, I. (2020). How to talk to Coronavirus Skeptics. The New Yorker. March 23.Google Scholar
Croucher, S. (2019). Trump Is a “Successful Sociopath” and a Predator Who “Lacks a Conscience and Lacks Empathy,” Says Former Harvard Psychiatrist.” Newsweek, October 29.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B. (2021). The Production and the Reception of Fake News – Then and Now. Polonium Foundation, Webinar, January 13. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppm4yij2N9kGoogle Scholar
D’Ancona, M. (2017). Post Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Davis, E. (2017). Post-Truth: Why We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
DeHaven-Smith, L. (1988). Philosophical Critique of Policy Analysis: Lindblom, Habermas and the Great Society. Gainsville: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Demelle, B. (2017). The Climate Denial Industry. www.beforetheflood.com/explore/thedeniers/the-climate-denial-industry/Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. New York: Swallow.Google Scholar
Diesing, P. (1962). Reason in Society: Five Types of Decisions in Their Social Context. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E. and Jacques, P. J. (2013). Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks: Exploring the Connection. American Behavioral Scientist, 57 (6): 699–731.Google Scholar
Dunn, W. N. (2019). Pragmatism and the Origins of the Policy Sciences: Rediscovering Lasswell and the Chicago School (Elements in Public Policy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnova, A. (2019). Understanding Emotions in Post-Factual Politics: Negotiating Truth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the Public Spectacle. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. N. (2010). A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eulau, H. ed. (1969). Behavioralism in Political Science. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
Farkas, J. and Schou, J. (2020). Post-Truth, Fake News and Democracy: Mapping the Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (1995). Evaluating Public Policy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2005). Are Scientists Irrational? Risk Assessment in Practical Reason. In Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B., eds. Science and Citizens. London: Zed: 54–65.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2007). Deliberative Policy Analysis as Practical Reason: Integrating Empirical and Normative Arguments, in F. Fischer, G. Miller, and M. Sidney, eds., Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. Theory, Politics and Methods. New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 223–236.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2017). Climate Crisis and the Democratic Prospect: Participatory Governance in Sustainable Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F. (2019). Knowledge Politics and Post-Truth in Climate Denial: On the Social Construction of Alternative Facts. Critical Policy Studies, 3 (2): 33–152.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2020). Post-Truth Politics and Climate Denial: Further Reflections. Critical Policy Studies. 14 (1): 124–130.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. and Boossabong, P. (2018). Deliberative Policy Analysis. In Dryzek, J. J., Mansbridge, J. and Warren, M., eds. Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 584–594.Google Scholar
Flood, A. (2016). “Post-Truth” Named Word of the Year by Oxford Dictionaries. The Guardian. November 15. www.theguardian.com/books/2016/nov/15/post-truth-named-word-of-the-year-by-oxford-dictionariesGoogle Scholar
Forber, V. (2020). Covid Confusion. Heartland Institute. May 11. www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/covid-confusionGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1975). Aristotle on Emotion. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (2014). The Scientific Method (and Other Heresies). In Moran, A., ed., Climate Change: The Facts. Melbourne: Institute of Public Affairs, pp. 252-263.Google Scholar
Franz, W. (1997). The Development of an Agenda for Climate Change: Connecting Science to Policy. Interim Report. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. IIASA, IR-97–034. Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
Fuller, S. (2018). Post Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of Public Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review. 66 (1): 66–75.Google Scholar
Gebrekidan, S. (2020). For Autocrats, and Others, Coronavirus Is a Chance to Grab Even More Power New York Times. March 31Google Scholar
Gibbins, J. R. and Reimer, B. (1999). The Politics of Postmodernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gibbons, A. (2017). Postmodernism is Dead. What Comes Next? Times Literary Supplement. June 12. www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/postmodernism-dead-comes-next/Google Scholar
Gitlin, T. (2020). The Enigma of Constancy: The Resilience of Trump’s Base. Salmagundi, No. 206–207, Spring–Summer: 67–94.Google Scholar
Graber, D. (2019). Against Economics. New York Review of Books. December 5. www.nybooks.com/articles/2019/12/05/against-economics/Google Scholar
Grauhan, R. and Strubelt, W. (1971). Political Rationality Reconsidered: Notes on an Integrated Scheme for Policy Choice. Policy Sciences, 2 (Summer): 270–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, J. (2017). Post Truth by Matthew D’Ancona and Post-Truth by Evan Davis Review – Is This Really a New Era of Politics? Guardian. May 19. www.theguardian.com/books/2017/may/19/post-truth-matthew-dancona-evan-davis-reiewsGoogle Scholar
Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. (2009). Analyzing Narrative Realities. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Haas, M. (1989). Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution. International Organization, 43 (3): 377–403.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. eds. (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, C. (2004). Postmodern Principles for Responsive Reading Assessment. Journal of Reading Research. 27. 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00224.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, R. (2012). The Paranoid Style in American Politics. New York: Knopf Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. (2003). The Politics of Post-Modernism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jamieson, K. H. and Cappella, J. N. (2010). Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. and Simmet, H. R. (2017). No Funeral Bells: Public Reason in a “Post-Truth” Age. Social Studies of Science, 47 (5): 751–770.Google Scholar
John, T. (2020). Tens of Thousands of Britons have Died from Coronavirus, but Boris Johnson is Stoking a Cultural War. CNN, June 20. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/20/uk/boris-johnson-coronavirus-culture-wars-gbr-intl/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. H. and Blair, J. A. (1996). Informal Logic and Critical Thinking. In van Eemeren, F., Grootendorst, R., and Snoeck Henkemans, F., eds. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 383–386.Google Scholar
Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K. and Shanahan, E. A. (2014). Introducing the Narrative Policy Framework. In Jones, M. D., Shanahan, E. A. and McBeth, M. K., eds. The Science of Stories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M. (2010). Fixing the Communications Failure. Nature, 463: 296–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/463296aGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M. (2017). The Cultural Cognition Project. Yale Law School. http://www.culturalcognition.net/kahan/Google Scholar
Kakutani, M. (2018). The Death of Truth: Notes on Falsehood in the Age of Trump. New York: Tim Duggan Books.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, H. and Rich, M. (2020). Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Keen, S. (2015). Narrative Emotions. In Narrative Form. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 152–161.Google Scholar
Kessler, G., Rizzo, S. and Kelly, M. (2020). President Trump has Made More Than 20,000 False or Misleading Claims. The Washington Post. July 13. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/07/13/president-trump-has-made-more-than-20000-false-or-misleading-claims/Google Scholar
Klein, J. A. (2005). Global Deception: The UN’s Stealth Assault on America’s Freedoms. Los Angeles: World Ahead Publishing.Google Scholar
Klein, N. (2011). Capitalism vs. the Climate. The Nation, November 9.Google Scholar
Kleres, J. (2010). Emotions and Narrative Analysis: Methodological Approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 42 (2): 182–202.Google Scholar
Kolbert, E. (2017). That‘s What You Think: Why Reason and Evidence Won’t Change our Minds. The New Yorker, February 27.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (2020). World War C. The Covid-19 Story, Told in Lies. New York Times, June 30.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laitman, M. (2020). Coronavirius and the Virus Hatred Against Jews. The Times of Israel. February 13. https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/coronavirus-and-the-virus-of-hatred-against-jews/.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. (1971). Pre-View of Policy Science. New York: American Elsevier Publishing.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. and Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and Society: A Framework of Political Inquiry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. and Lerner, D. eds. (1951). The Policy Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2017). Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30 (2): 2004.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2018). Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Cambridge, UK Polity Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. and Cook, J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6 (4): 353–369.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (2016). American Political Parties are Just Tribes Now. The Daily Beast. January 2. www.thedailybeast.com/americas-political-parties-are-just-tribes-now.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. and Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lomborg, B. (2001). The Skeptical Environmentalist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lundberg, H. (2013). Karl Mannheim’s Sociology of Political Knowledge. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/43807Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue. 3rd ed. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, E. (2020). No Matter Who Wins the US Election, the World’s “Fake News” Problem is Here to Stay. CNN, October 25. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/25/world/trump-fake-news-legacy-intl/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
MacRae, D. (1976). The Social Function of Social Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1986 [1925]). Conservatism. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Markus, G. E. (2002). The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Martelle, S. (2020). “LIBERATE MICHIGAN!” Trump Tweets to Armed Protesters. What Was He Thinking? Los Angeles Times. April 17. www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-04-17/liberate-michigan-trump-tweets-2nd-amendment-coronavirus-pandemicGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R. (2019). Psychological Underpinnings of Post-Truth in Policy Beliefs. PS: Political Science and Politics. April: 218–222.Google Scholar
McInytre, L. (2018). Post-Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Miller, C. (2004). Climate Science and the Making of a Global Political Order, in Jasanoff, S., ed., States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. New York: Routledge, pp. 46–66.Google Scholar
Miller, H. (2020). Narrative Politics in Public Policy: Legalizing Cannibis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Moyer, M. W. (2019). People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share a Cluster of Psychological Features. The Scientific American, March 1. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-drawn-to-conspiracy-theories-share-a-cluster-of-psychological-features/Google Scholar
Münch, S. (2016). Interpretative Policy-Analyse. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Nichols, T. (2019). In Trump’s World, Reality is Negotiable. The Atlantic, January 13. www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/01/donald-trump-rejects-expertise/579808/Google Scholar
Nolte, J. (2020). All the Establishment Media’s Dangerous Coronavirus Lies. Breitbart, March 17. www.breitbart.com/the-media/2020/03/17/nolte-all-the-establishment-medias-dangerous-coronavirus-lies/Google Scholar
Nurius, P. (2013). Cognition and Social Cognitive Theory Encyclopedia of Social Work. Published online: 11 June 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.65Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nyhan, B. (2021). Why the Backfire Effect Does Not Explain the Durability of Political Misperceptions. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (15): e1912440117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ornstein, N. and Mann, T. E. (2016). It‘s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Orwell, S. and Angus, I. eds. (1980). The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, Vol. II. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Packer, G. (2018). A New Report Offers Insights Into Tribalism in the Age of Trump. New Yorker, October 13. www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/a-new-report-offers-insights-into-tribalism-in-the-age-of-trumpGoogle Scholar
Pappas, P. (2011). Climate Scientist Calls Hacked “Climategate” Emails “Truly Pathetic.” Live Science, November 22.Google Scholar
Perl, A., Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. (2018). Policy-Making and Truthiness: Can Existing Policy Models Cope With Politicized Evidence and Willful Ignorance in a “Post-Fact” World? Policy Sciences, 51(4): 581–600.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2018). The Intellectual War on Science: It’s Wreaking Havoc in Universities and Jeopardizing the Progress of Research. The Chronicle of Higher Education, February 13.Google Scholar
Plough, A. and Krimsky, S. (1987). The Emergence of Risk Communication Studies: Social and Political Context. Science, Technology and Human Values, 12 (3–4): 4–10.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, T. and Samuels, D. (2014). The Impact of Participatory Democracy: Evidence from Brazil’s National Public Policy Conferences. Comparative Politics, 46 (3): 313–332.Google Scholar
Porter, T. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Proctor, R. (2008). Agnatology: A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Production of Ignorance (and Its Study). In Proctor, R. and Schiebinger, L., eds. The Making and Unmasking of Ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Proctor, R. and Schiebinger, L. eds. (2008). The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P. and Sullivan, W. M. eds. (1987). Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rauch, J. (2021). The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. A. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Robert, C. and Zechhauser, R. (2010). The Methodology of Positive Policy Analysis. Working Paper Series RWP10-041, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/harjfk/rwp10-041.htmlGoogle Scholar
Roe, E. (1994). Narrative Policy Analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Roe, E. (2020). When Complex is as Simple as it Gets. https://mess-and-reliability.blog/. Published October 22, 2020.Google Scholar
Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Postmodernism and the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, N. L. and Muirhead, R. (2019). A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. (1996). Science Wars. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A., (1988). An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences, 21(June): 129–168.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. J. (2020). Disdain for the Less Educated Is the Last Acceptable Prejudice. New York Times, September 2. www.nytimes.com/2020/09/02/opinion/education-prejudice.html?referringSource=articleShareGoogle Scholar
Sandman, P. (1987). Risk Communication: Facing Public Outrage. US EPA Journal, November: 21–22.Google Scholar
Schield, M. (2007). “Teaching the Social Construction of Statistics,” Research Gate. www.researchgate.net/publication/277299441_Teaching_the_Social_Construction_of_Statistics.Google Scholar
Schmid., A. (1989). Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Political Economy Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. L. and Ingram, H. eds. (2006). Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. (2013). Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy. Cambridge University Press (online: September 2, 2013).Google Scholar
Schoenfeld, A., Walker, L. A. S., Jones, L. W. and Gamio, L. (2020). Is the Corona Death Tally Inflated: Here is why the Experts Say No. New York Times, June 20.Google Scholar
Schuman, D. (1982). Policy Analysis, Education, and Everyday Life. Toronto: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Scriven, M. (1987). Probative Logic. In Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Blair, J. A. and Willard., C. A. eds. Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline. Amsterdam: Foris.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and Well-Being. In Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A., eds. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 30–53.Google Scholar
Shear, M., Haberman, M. and Herdon, S. (2020). Trump Rally Fizzles as Attendance Falls Short of Campaign’s Expectations. New York Times, June 21. www.boston.com/news/politics/2020/06/21/trump-rally-fizzles-as-crowd-size-falls-short-of-campaigns-expectationsGoogle Scholar
Slessor, C. (2020). Why Do Coronavirus Sceptics and Deniers Continue to Downplay the Disease. ABC News, May 2. www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-03/coronavirus-sceptics-continue-to-downplay-covid19/12201344Google Scholar
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1979). Rating the Risks. Environment, 21: 36–39.Google Scholar
Sokal, A. D. (2008). Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2020). Relativism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stephens., B. (2020). Biden’s Loose Lips Could Sink His Chance. New York Times, August 24: 23.Google Scholar
Stillitoe, P. (2007). Local Science vs Global Science: An Overview. In Stillitoe, P. ed. Local Science vs Global Science. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (1988). Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Glenview, IL; Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (2020). Counting: How We Use Numbers to Decide What Matters. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R. (2020). Coronavirus: FDA Chief Disputes Trump’s Claim “Deep State” is Delaying Vaccine Until After US Election. Independent, August 25. www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/coronavirus-fda-chief-trump-claim-vaccine-delay-us-election-deep-state-a9687271.htmlGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. (1961). Normative Discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Thies, C. (2020). The Real Threat of Viruses. Heartland Institute. February 10. www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/the-real-threat-of-virusesGoogle Scholar
Tormey, S. (2016). The Contemporary Crisis of Representative Democracy. Parliament of Australia, Papers on Parliament, No. 66. www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/pops/Papers_on_Parliament_66/The_Contemporary_Crisis_of_Representative_DemocracyGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Bommel, S.. Hulst, M. Yanow, D. 2020. Interpretive Policy Analysis in the Netherlands, in van Nispen and Scholten, P. eds. Policy Analysis and Evaluation in the Netherlands: Institutionalization and Performance. Bristol: Policy PressGoogle Scholar
Vence, T. and Grant, B. (2017). March for Science: Dispatches from Washington, D.C. The Scientist, April 21. www.the-scientist.com/daily-news/march-for-science-dispatches-from-washington-dc–31632Google Scholar
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. and Aral, S. (2018). The Spread of True and False News Online. Science, 359 (6380), March 9, 2018: 1146–1151.Google Scholar
Warzel, C. (2019). Why Trump Tweeted About Civil War. New York Times, September 30. www.nytimes.com/2019/09/30/opinion/trump-civil-war.htmlGoogle Scholar
Warzel, C. (2020). Is QAnon the Most Dangerous Conspiracy Theory of the 21st Century. New York Times, April 4.Google Scholar
Watson, B. (2016). Stephen Colbert: Beyond Truthiness. Cleveland, OH: New Word City. www.nytimes.com/2020/08/04/opinion/qanon-conspiracy-theory-arg.html?referringSource=articleShareGoogle Scholar
Waugh, R. (2011). New Leak of Hacked Global Warming Scientist Emails: A “Smoking Gun” Proving a Conspiracy – Or Just Hot Air? Mail Online, November 22. www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2064826/New-leak-hacked-global-warming-scientist-emails-A-smoking-gun-proving-conspiracy–just-hot-air.htmlGoogle Scholar
Weimer, D. L. and Vining, A. R. (2017). Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (2020). The Rightwing Christian Preachers in Deep Denial Over Covid-19’s Danger. The Guardian, April 4.Google Scholar
Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Interpretations and Method: Empirical Research and the Interpretive Turn. Armonk, NY: M. F. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Young, K., Ashby, D. Boaz, A. and Grayson, L. (2002). Social Science and the Evidence-Based Policy Movement. Social Policy and Society, 1 (3): 215–224.Google Scholar
Zimmer, B. (2010). Truthiness. New York Times, October 13. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/magazine/17FOB-onlanguage-t.htmlGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Truth and Post-Truth in Public Policy
  • Frank Fischer, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Online ISBN: 9781108854344
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Truth and Post-Truth in Public Policy
  • Frank Fischer, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Online ISBN: 9781108854344
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Truth and Post-Truth in Public Policy
  • Frank Fischer, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Online ISBN: 9781108854344
Available formats
×