Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:32:58.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements of Paleontology

Confronting Prior Conceptions in Paleontology Courses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2018

Margaret M. Yacobucci
Margaret M. Yacobucci
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio

Summary

People hold a variety of prior conceptions that impact their learning. Prior conceptions that include erroneous or incomplete understandings represent a significant barrier to durable learning, as they are often difficult to change. While researchers have documented students' prior conceptions in many areas of geoscience, little is known about prior conceptions involving paleontology. In this Element, data on student prior conceptions from two introductory undergraduate paleontology courses are presented. In addition to more general misunderstandings about the nature of science, many students hold incorrect ideas about methods of historical geology, Earth history, ancient life, and evolution. Of special note are student perceptions of the limits of paleontology as scientific inquiry. By intentionally eliciting students' prior conceptions and implementing the pedagogical strategies described in other Elements in this series, lecturers can shape instruction to challenge this negative view of paleontology and improve student learning.
Get access

Keywords

PedagogySTEM EducationPaleontologyNature of ScienceEvolutionUndergraduate
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements of Paleontology
Online ISBN: 9781108681391
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 15 November 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., and Norman, G. L. (2002). Development and validation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 952–978.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. W., and Libarkin, J. C. (2016). Conceptual mobility and entrenchment in introductory geoscience courses: New questions regarding physics’ and chemistry’s role in learning Earth science concepts. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64, 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthurs, L., Hsia, J. F., and Schweinle, W. (2015). The Oceanography Concept Inventory: A semicustomizable assessment for measuring student understanding of oceanography. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63, 310–322.Google Scholar
Baldwin, K. A., and Cooper, C. M. (2014). Online and on-campus historical geology students’ prior ideas about global climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 410–416.Google Scholar
Bilici, S. C., Armagan, F. O., Cakir, N. K., and Yuruk, N. (2011). The development of an Astronomy Concept Inventory (ACI). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2454–2458.Google Scholar
Bodzin, A. M., Anastasio, D., Sahagian, D., Peffer, T., Dempsey, C., and Steelman, R. (2014). Investigating climate change understandings of urban middle-level students. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 417–430.Google Scholar
Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (eds.). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC: National Research Council.Google Scholar
Capps, D. K., McAllister, M., and Boone, W. J. (2013). Alternative conceptions concerning the Earth’s interior exhibited by Honduran students. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61, 231–239.Google Scholar
Cheek, K. A. (2010). Commentary: A summary and analysis of twenty-seven years of geoscience conceptions research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58, 122–134.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., and de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27–43.Google Scholar
Clark, S. K., Libarkin, J. C., Kortz, K. M., and Jordan, S. C. (2011). Alternative conceptions of plate tectonics held by nonscience undergraduates. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59, 251–262.Google Scholar
Climate Literacy Network. (2009). Climate Literacy: The Essential Principles of Climate Sciences, http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/literacy/climate_literacy.pdf. Accessed December 1, 2017.Google Scholar
Dahl, J., Anderson, S. W., and Libarkin, J. C. (2005). Digging into Earth science: Alternative conceptions held by K-12 teachers. Journal of Science Education, 6, 65–68.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. M. (2018). Education research as applied to paleontology education: How people learn and how we can teach more effectively. Paleontological Society Short Course: Pedagogy and Technology in the Modern Paleontology Classroom. Elements of Paleontology.Google Scholar
D’Avanzo, C. (2008). Biology concept inventories: Overview, status, and next steps. BioScience, 58, 1079–1085.Google Scholar
Dodick, J. T., and Orion, N. (2003). Measuring student understanding of “deep time.” Science Education, 87, 708–731.Google Scholar
Dole, J. A., and Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33, 109–128.Google Scholar
Donovan, M. S., and Bransford, J. D. (2005). How Students Learn Science in the Classroom, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Dove, J. E. (1998). Students’ alternative conceptions in Earth science: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Research Papers in Education, 13, 183–201.Google Scholar
Driver, R., and Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.Google Scholar
Driver, R., and Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students’ conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37–60.Google Scholar
Driver, R., Guesne, E., and Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s Ideas in Science, Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., and Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into Children’s Ideas, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duit, R., and Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earth Science Literacy Initiative. (2010). Earth Science Literacy Principles: The Big Ideas and Supporting Concepts of Earth Science, www.earthscienceliteracy.org. Accessed November 28, 2017.Google Scholar
Felzmann, D. (2017). Students’ conceptions of glaciers and ice ages: Applying the Model of Educational Reconstruction to improve learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65, 322–355.Google Scholar
Flammer, L. (1999). Science Knowledge Survey, www.indiana.edu/~ensiweb/lessons/sci.tst.html. Accessed November 30, 2017.Google Scholar
Francek, M. (2013). A compilation and review of over 500 geoscience misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulwiler, T. (1987). Teaching with Writing, Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.Google Scholar
Garvin-Doxas, K., and Klymkowsky, M. W. (2008). Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: Lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). CBE – Life Sciences Education, 7, 227–233.Google Scholar
Geoscience Concept Inventory Wiki. (No Date). https://geoscienceconceptinventory.wikispaces.com/. Accessed November 30, 2017.Google Scholar
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., and Swackhammer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–151.Google Scholar
Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 383–396.Google Scholar
Hewson, P. W. (1992). Conceptual change in science teaching and teacher education. Paper presented in June 1992, National Center for Educational Research, Documentation, and Assessment, Madrid, Spain, www.learner.org/workshops/lala2/support/hewson.pdf. Accessed November 27, 2017.Google Scholar
Hewson, P. W., and Hewson, M. G. A’B. (1988). An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning. Science Education, 72, 597–614.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, A. J., and Otero, J. (2004). An analysis of the understanding of geological time by students at secondary and post-secondary level. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 845–857.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. K., and Reynolds, S. J. (2005). Concept sketches: Using student- and instructor-generated, annotated sketches for learning, teaching, and assessment in geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 85–95.Google Scholar
Jolley, A., Jones, F., and Harris, S. (2013). Measuring student knowledge of landscapes and their formation timespans. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61, 240–251.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. (2005). Science Curriculum Topic Study: Bridging the Gap between Standards and Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. (2008). Science Formative Assessment: 75 Practical Strategies for Linking Assessment, Instruction, and Learning, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. (2011). Uncovering Student Ideas, www.uncoveringstudentideas.org/. Accessed November 30, 2017.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. (2015a). Mountaintop fossil: A puzzling phenomenon. Science and Children, 53(4), 24–26.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. (2015b). Science Formative Assessment, Vol. 2: 50 More Strategies for Linking Assessment, Instruction, and Learning, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Keeley, P., Eberle, F., and Dorsey, C. (2008). Uncovering Student Ideas in Science, Vol. 3: Another 25 Formative Assessment Probes, Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.Google Scholar
Keeley, P., Eberle, F., and Farrin, L. (2005). Uncovering Student Ideas in Science: 25 Formative Assessment Probes, Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.Google Scholar
Keeley, P., Eberle, F., and Tugel, J. (2007). Uncovering Student Ideas in Science, Vol. 2: 25 More Formative Assessment Probes, Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.Google Scholar
Keeley, P., and Tugel, J. (2009). Uncovering Student Ideas in Science, Vol. 4: 25 New Formative Assessment Probes, Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.Google Scholar
Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter, Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. L., Lindgren, J., and Bleicher, R. (2012). Assessing elementary science methods students’ understanding about global climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1167–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, O. (2001). Preface: Culture and language in science education: What do we know and what do we need to know? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 499–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Buxton, C., Penfield, R., and Secada, W. G. (2009). Urban elementary teachers’ perspectives on teaching science to English language learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libarkin, J. C. (2006). College student conceptions of geological phenomena and their importance in classroom instruction. Planet, 17(1), 6–9.Google Scholar
Libarkin, J. (2008). Concept Inventories in Higher Education Science. National Research Council, www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Libarkin_CommissionedPaper.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2017.Google Scholar
Libarkin, J. C., and Anderson, S. W. (2005). Assessment of learning in entry-level geoscience courses: Results from the Geoscience Concept Inventory. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 394–401.Google Scholar
Libarkin, J. C., and Anderson, S. W. (2007a). Development of the Geoscience Concept Inventory. Proceedings of the National STEM Assessment Conference, Washington DC, October 19–21, 2006, 148–158.Google Scholar
Libarkin, J. C., and Anderson, S. W. (2007b). The Geoscience Concept Inventory: Application of Rasch Analysis to concept inventory development in higher education. In Liu, X. and Boone, W., eds., Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education, Maple Grove, MN: JAM Publishers, pp. 45–73.Google Scholar
Libarkin, J. C., Anderson, S. W., Science, J. D., Beilfuss, M., and Boone, W. (2005). Qualitative analysis of college students’ ideas about the Earth: Interviews and open-ended questionnaires. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 17–26.Google Scholar
Libarkin, J., Jardeleza, S. E., and McElhinny, T. L. (2014). The role of concept inventories in course assessment. In Tong, V. C. H., ed., Geoscience Research and Education: Teaching at Universities, Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol. 20, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 275–297.Google Scholar
Libarkin, J. C., and Kurdziel, J. P. (2001). Research methodologies in science education: Assessing students’ alternative conceptions. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49, 378–383.Google Scholar
Libarkin, J. C., and Kurdziel, J. P. (2002). Research methodologies in science education: The qualitative-quantitative debate. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libarkin, J. C., and Kurdziel, J. P. (2006). Ontology and the teaching of Earth system science. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 408–413.Google Scholar
Libarkin, J. C., Kurdziel, J. P., and Anderson, S. W. (2007). College student conceptions of geological time and the disconnect between ordering and scale. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55, 413–422.Google Scholar
Libarkin, J. C., Ward, E. M. G., Anderson, S. W., Kortemeyer, G., and Raeburn, S. P. (2011). Revisiting the Geoscience Concept Inventory: A call to the community. GSA Today, 21(8), 26–28.Google Scholar
Lindell, R., Peak, E., and Foster, T. (2007). Are they all created equal? A comparison of different concept inventory development methodologies. Physics Education Research Conference, American Institute of Physics, 883, 14–17.Google Scholar
Luykx, A., Lee, O., and Edwards, U. (2008). Lost in translation: Negotiating meaning in a beginning ESOL science classroom. Educational Policy, 22, 640–674.Google Scholar
Martínez, P., Bannan, B., and Kitsantas, A. (2012). Bilingual students’ ideas and conceptual change about slow geomorphological changes caused by water. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60, 54–66.Google Scholar
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual, Series in Educational Innovation, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
McConnell, D. A., Steer, D. N., Owens, K. D., and Knight, C. C. (2005). How students think: Implications for learning in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 462–470.Google Scholar
McConnell, D. A., Steer, D. N., Owens, K. D., Knott, J. R., Van Horn, S., Borowski, W., Dick, J., Foos, A., Malone, M., McGrew, H., Greer, L., and Heaney, P. J. (2006). Using conceptests to assess and improve student conceptual understanding in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 61–68.Google Scholar
McCuin, J. L., Hayhoe, K., and Hayhoe, D. (2014). Comparing the effects of traditional vs. misconceptions-based instruction on student understanding of the greenhouse effect. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 445–459.Google Scholar
McDermott, M. (2010). More than writing-to-learn. The Science Teacher, 77(1), 32–36.Google Scholar
McNeal, K. S., Spry, J. M., Mitra, R., and Tipton, J. L. (2014). Measuring student engagement, knowledge, and perceptions of climate change in an introductory environmental geology course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 655–667.Google Scholar
Mulford, D. R., and Robinson, W. R. (2002). An inventory for misconceptions in first-semester general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 739–744.Google Scholar
Nathan, M. J., and Alibali, M. W. (2010). Learning sciences. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 329–345.Google Scholar
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2005). Exploring Different Dimensions of Student Engagement, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.Google Scholar
Nelson-Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., and Schwartz, M. J. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49, 469–494.Google Scholar
Pavelich, M., Jenkins, B., Birk, J., Bauer, R., and Krause, S. (2004). Development of a chemistry concept inventory for use in chemistry, materials and other engineering courses. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Paper #2004–1907.Google Scholar
Perez, K. E., Hiatt, A., David, G. K., Trujillo, C., French, D. P., Terry, M., and Prince, R. M. (2013). The EvoDevoCI: A concept inventory for gauging students’ understanding of evolutionary developmental biology. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 12, 665–675.Google Scholar
Petcovic, H. L., and Ruhf, R. J. (2008). Geoscience conceptual knowledge of preservice elementary teachers: Results from the Geoscience Concept Inventory. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56, 251–260.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. (1991). Earth science misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 58(2), 21–23.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1967). Logique et Connaissance Scientifique, Encyclopédie de la Pléiade, Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand Is to Invent, New York, NY: Grossman.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. Translated from the French by Weaver, H.. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.Google Scholar
Raia, F. (2005). Students’ understanding of complex dynamic systems. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 297–308.Google Scholar
Rebich, S., and Gautier, C. (2005). Concept mapping to reveal prior knowledge and conceptual change in a mock summit course on global climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichert, C., Cervato, C., Larsen, M., and Niederhauser, D. (2014). Conceptions of atmospheric carbon budgets: Undergraduate students’ perceptions of mass balance. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 460–468.Google Scholar
Reinfried, S., and Schuler, S. (2009). Die Ludwigsburg-Luzerner Bibliographie zur Alltagsvorstellungsforschung in den Geowissenschaften – ein Projekt zur Erfassung der internationalen Forschungsliteratur [The Ludwigsburg-Lucerne bibliography on conceptual change research in the geosciences – A project to establish a comprehensive collection of international research papers in the field]. Geographie und ihre Didaktik, 37, 120–135, www.ph-ludwigsburg.de/llbg.html. Accessed November 28, 2017. [Note: In German. Updated listing of papers is available for download from this website in pdf, Word, or EndNote formats.]Google Scholar
Schoon, K. J. (1992). Students’ alternative conceptions of earth and space. Journal of Geological Education, 40, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, K. S., Herbert, B. E., Stuessy, C. L., and Schielack, J. (2006). Supporting student conceptual model development of complex Earth systems through the use of multiple representations and inquiry. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 396–407.Google Scholar
Sexton, J. M. (2012). College students’ conceptions of the role of rivers in canyon formation. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60, 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibley, D. F. (2005). Visual abilities and misconceptions about plate tectonics. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 471–477.Google Scholar
Smith, G. A., and Bermea, S. B. (2012). Using students’ sketches to recognize alternative conceptions about plate tectonics persisting from prior instruction. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60, 350–359.Google Scholar
Smith, J. I., and Tanner, K. (2010). The problem of revealing how students think: Concept inventories and beyond. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 9, 1–5.Google Scholar
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., and Knight, J. K. (2008). The Genetics Concept Assessment: A new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 7, 422–430.Google Scholar
Solano-Flores, G., and Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553–573.Google Scholar
Steer, D. N., Knight, C. C., Owens, K. D., and McConnell, D. A. (2005). Challenging students [sic] ideas about Earth’s interior structure using a model-based, conceptual change approach in a large class setting. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 415–421.Google Scholar
Stepans, J. (2008). Targeting Students’ Physical Science Misconceptions Using the Conceptual Change Model, 3rd edn, Saint Cloud, MN: Saiwood Publications.Google Scholar
Svinicki, M. (1995). Using cognitive theories to improve teaching. The Teaching Professor, 9(4), 3–4.Google Scholar
Teed, R., and Slattery, W. (2011). Changes in geologic time understanding in a class for preservice teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59, 151–162.Google Scholar
Treagust, D. (1986). Evaluating students’ misconceptions by means of diagnostic multiple choice items. Research in Science Education, 16, 199–207.Google Scholar
Treagust, D., and Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 297–328.Google Scholar
Trend, R. D. (1998). An investigation into understanding of geological time among 10- and 11-year-old children. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 973–988.Google Scholar
Trend, R. D. (2000). Conceptions of geological time among primary teacher trainees, with reference to their engagement with geoscience, history, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 539–555.Google Scholar
Trend, R. D. (2001). Deep time frameworks: A preliminary study of U.K. primary teachers’ conceptions of geological time and perceptions of geoscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 191–221.Google Scholar
Undersander, M. A., Kettler, R. M., and Stains, M. (2017). Exploring the item order effect in a geoscience concept inventory. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65, 292–303.Google Scholar
Understanding Evolution. (2017). Misconceptions about Evolution, https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_teacherfaq.php. Accessed November 30, 2017.Google Scholar
Understanding Science. (2017). Misconceptions about Science, https://undsci.berkeley.edu/teaching/misconceptions.php. Accessed November 30, 2017.Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S., and Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the Earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–385.Google Scholar
Ward, E. M. G., Libarkin, J. C., Raeburn, S., and Kortemeyer, G. (2010). The Geoscience Concept Inventory Web Center provides new means for student assessment. eLearningPapers, 20, 1–14.Google Scholar
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design, expanded 2nd edn, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Wild, T. A., Hilson, M. P., and Farrand, K. M. (2013). Conceptual understanding of geological concepts by students with visual impairments. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61, 222–230.Google Scholar
Yacobucci, M. M. (2012). Using active learning strategies to promote deep learning in the undergraduate paleontology classroom. In Yacobucci, M. M. and Lockwood, R., eds., Teaching Paleontology in the 21st Century, Paleontological Society Special Publications, 12, 135–153.Google Scholar
Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Tomita, M. K., and Young, D. B. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 335–359.Google Scholar
Zull, J. E. (2004). The art of changing the brain. Educational Leadership, 62, 68–72.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Confronting Prior Conceptions in Paleontology Courses
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Confronting Prior Conceptions in Paleontology Courses
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Confronting Prior Conceptions in Paleontology Courses
Available formats
×