Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:37:04.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Organization Theory

Cultural Entrepreneurship

A New Agenda for the Study of Entrepreneurial Processes and Possibilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2019

Michael Lounsbury  and
Mary Ann Glynn
Michael Lounsbury
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Mary Ann Glynn
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts

Summary

This Element provides an overview of cultural entrepreneurship scholarship and seeks to lay the foundation for a broader and more integrative research agenda at the interface of organization theory and entrepreneurship. Its scholarly agenda includes a range of phenomena from the legitimation of new ventures, to the construction of novel or alternative organizational or collective identities, and, at even more macro levels, to the emergence of new entrepreneurial possibilities and market categories. Michael Lounsbury and Mary Ann Glynn develop novel theoretical arguments and discuss the implications for mainstream entrepreneurship research, focusing on the study of entrepreneurial processes and possibilities.
Get access

Keywords

cultural entrepreneurshipentrepreneurshiporganization theoryculture
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Organization Theory
Online ISBN: 9781108539487
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 24 January 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, E., & Baumard, P. 2008. What lies behind organizational façades and how organizational façades lie: An untold story of organizational decision making. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making, pp. 437–452.Google Scholar
Ahl, H. 2006. Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), pp. 595–621.Google Scholar
Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. 1985. Organizational identity. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., pp. 263–295.Google Scholar
Aldrich, H. E. 2012. The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: A personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 41: 1240–1248.Google Scholar
Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), pp. 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. 2006. Organizations Evolving, SAGE Publications. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?id=PIWJf4l5eMsC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H. E., & Waldinger, R. 1990. Ethnicity and entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), pp. 111–135.Google Scholar
Aldrich, H. E., & Wiedenmayer, G. 1993. From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organizational foundings. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, 1(3), pp. 145–196.Google Scholar
Aldrich, H. E., & Zimmer., C. 1986. Entrepreneurship through social networks. In Sexton, D. & Smilor, R., eds. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. New York: Ballinger, pp. 3–23. Available at: www.unc.edu/~healdric/Publ.pdf.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C. 2003. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, S. A., et al. 2014. Realism in the study of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 39(2), pp. 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. 2010. Entrepreneurship and epistemology: The philosophical underpinnings of the study of entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), pp. 557–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. 2007. The entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), pp. 1057–1063.Google Scholar
Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Anderson, P. 2013. Forming and exploiting opportunities: The implications of discovery and creation processes for entrepreneurial and organizational research. Organization Science, 24(1), pp. 301–317.Google Scholar
Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. 2010. Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Aademy of Management Review, 35(1), pp. 67–92.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1983. Innovation in large and small firms. In Entrepreneurship. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 15–28.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. 1997. The ubiquity and potency of labeling in organizations. Organization Science, 8(1), pp. 43–58.Google Scholar
Askin, N., & Mauskapf, M. 2017. What makes popular culture popular?: Product features and optimal differentiation in music. American Sociological Review 82, pp. 910–944.Google Scholar
Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. 2007. The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), pp. 599–623.Google Scholar
Bail, C. A. 2014. The cultural environment: Measuring culture with big data. Theory and Society, 43(3–4), pp. 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. 2003. Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2), pp. 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), pp. 329–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. 2004. Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), pp. 523–549. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=14438585&site=bsi-live.Google Scholar
Barney, J., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R. A. 1998. Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when enterpreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), pp. 275–294.Google Scholar
Baron, R. A. 2008. The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), pp. 328–340.Google Scholar
Barry, D., & Elmes, M. 1997. Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), pp. 429–452.Google Scholar
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. 2009. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, pp. 65–107.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 1983. Toward operational models of entrepreneurship. In Entrepreneurship, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
Bearman, P., Faris, R., & Moody, J. 1999. Blocking the future: New solutions for old problems in historical social science. Social Science History, 23(4), pp. 501–533.Google Scholar
Bearman, P., & Parigi, P. 2004. Cloning headless frogs and other important matters: Conversation topics and network structure. Social Forces, 83(2), pp. 535–557.Google Scholar
Bearman, P. S., & Stovel, K. 2000. Becoming a Nazi: A model for narrative networks. Poetics, 27(2–3), pp. 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckert, J. 2016. Imagined Futures. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bennis, W. 1996. On Becoming a Leader. Pearson Education Canada.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Boje, D. M. 1991. The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 106–126.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Jones, C., & Everett, M. G. 1998. Network measures of social capital. Connections, 21(2), pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1983. The field of cultural production or: the economic world reversed. In Johnson, R., ed. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 29–73.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1998. Practical Reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 2007. Sketch for a Self-Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. 2008. Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 78–98.Google Scholar
Breiger, R. L. 1974. The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53(2), pp. 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breiger, R. L., & Mohr, J. W. 2004. Institutional logics from the aggregation of organizational networks: Operational procedures for the analysis of counted data. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 10(1), pp. 17–43.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. 1991. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), pp. 475–482. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001.Google Scholar
Brown, A. D., Gabriel, Y., & Gherardi, S. 2009. Storytelling and change: An unfolding story. Organization, 16(3), pp. 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. 1991. The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. 1995 Issue. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byron, C. M. 2002. Martha, Inc. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Cardon, M. S., et al. 2005. A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), pp. 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardon, M. S. 2009. The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), pp. 511–532.Google Scholar
Carley, K. 1993. Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, pp. 75–126.Google Scholar
Chiles, Todd H., Tuggle, Christopher S., McMullen, Jeffery S., Bierman, Leonard, and Greening, Daniel W.. 2010. Dynamic creation: Extending the radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies 31 (1). SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England: 7–46.Google Scholar
Cliff, J. E., Langton, N., & Aldrich, H. E. 2005. Walking the talk? Gendered rhetoric vs. action in small firms. Organization Studies, 26(1), pp. 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, T. C. 1949. Role and sanction in American entrepreneurial history. In Cole, A. H., ed., Change and the Entrepreneur: Postulates and Patterns for Entrepreneurial History. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 153–175.Google Scholar
Companys, Y. E., & McMullen, J. S. 2007. Strategic entrepreneurs at work: the nature, discovery, and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Small Business Economics, 28(4), pp. 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, M. L., & Burress, M. J. 2009. A cooperative life cycle framework. In International Conference “Rural Cooperation in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Past, Pathways to the Future,” June, pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., & Clarke, J. S. 2010. Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: Inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. The Academy of Management Review, pp. 539–557.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., Haslam, S. A., & Balmer, J. M. T. 2007. Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: Towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings and products. British Journal of Management, 18(s1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., Holt, R., & Zundel, M., 2011. The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimization of strategic change. Organization Studies, 32(12), pp. 1701–1716.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. 2014. Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), p.181 LP-235. Available at: http://annals.aom.org/content/8/1/181.abstract.Google Scholar
Creed, W. E. D., Scully, M. A., & Austin, J. R. 2002. Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science, 13(5), pp. 475–496.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B., 1997. Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B., & Wolff, R. 1998. Constructing new identities in established organization fields: Young universities in old Europe. International Studies of Management & Organization, 28(3), pp. 32–56.Google Scholar
Dalpiaz, E., & Cavotta, , Forthcoming. A double-edged sword: Cultural entrepreneurship and the mobilization of morally tainted cultural resources. Innovation: Organization and Management.Google Scholar
Deephouse, D. L. 1996. Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), pp. 1024–1039.Google Scholar
Deephouse, D. L. 1999. To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), pp. 147–166. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097–0266(199902)20:2%3C147::AID-SMJ11%3E3.0.CO.Google Scholar
Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. 2008. Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In Greenwood, R. et al., eds., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 49–77.Google Scholar
Dewey, J., 1922. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology, Carlton House.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1987. Classification in art. American Sociological Review, 52(4), pp. 440–455.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1982. Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston: The creation of an organizational base for high culture. Media, Culture and Society, 4, pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1986. Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth century Boston. In DiMaggio, P. J., ed. Non-Profit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 41–61.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1997. Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, pp. 263–287.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Zucker, L. G., ed., Institutional Patterns and Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1991. Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums, 1920–1940. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J., eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 267–292.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1997. Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, pp. 263–287.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1983. State expansion and organizational fields. In Hall, R. H. & Quinn, R. E., eds., Organizational Theory and Public Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 147–161.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1994. The challenge of community evolution. In Baum, J. A. C. & Singh, J. V., eds., Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press., pp. 444–456.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. 2013. Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of US government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), pp. 570–606.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp. 147–160.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F. 1994. Cultural models of organization: The social construction of rational organizing principles. In Crane, D., ed., The Sociology of Culture: Emerging Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 117–141). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duguid, P. 2005. “The art of knowing”: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21(2), pp. 109–118.Google Scholar
Duquenne, V. 1991. The core of finite lattices. Discrete Mathematics, 88(2–3), pp. 133–147.Google Scholar
Durand, R., & Calori, R. 2006. Sameness, otherness? Enriching organizational change theories with philosophical considerations on the same and the other. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), pp. 93–114.Google Scholar
Durand, R., & Kremp, P.-A. 2016. Classical deviation: Organizational and individual status as antecedents of conformity. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), pp. 65–89.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. 1990. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 504–529.Google Scholar
Elsbach, K. D., & Glynn, M. A. 1996. Believing your own “PR”: Embedding identification in strategic reputation. Advances in Strategic Management, 13, pp. 65–90.Google Scholar
Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. 1996. Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), pp. 442–476.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. 1997. Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), pp. 281–317.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M., & Johnson, V. 2008. Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and Society, 37(1), pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), pp. 962–1023.Google Scholar
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. 1998. Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), pp. 313–343.Google Scholar
Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., & Uzzi, B. 2000. Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. 1981. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), pp. 171–186.Google Scholar
Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. 2009. Entrepreneurs as theorists: on the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), pp. 127–146.Google Scholar
Fine, G. A. 1991. On the macrofoundations of microsociology. Sociological Quarterly, 32(2), pp. 161–177. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533–8525.1991.tb00351.x.Google Scholar
Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. 2016. Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383–409.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. 2012. A Theory of Fields. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. 2012. Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., & Bjørnskov, C. forthcoming. The context of entrepreneurial judgment: Organizations, markets and institutions. Journal of Management Studies.Google Scholar
Fourcade, M. 2009. Economists and Societies. Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Franzois, R. 1998. Narrative as data. Linguistic and statistical tools for the quantitative study of historical events. In van der Linden, M. & Griffin, L., eds. New Methods in Historical Sociology/Social History. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press., pp. 81–104.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C., & White, D. R. 1993. Using Galois lattices to represent network data. Sociological Methodology, 23, pp. 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, R. 2009. The endless fields of Pierre Bourdieu. Organization, 16(6), pp. 887–917.Google Scholar
Friedland, R. 2018. Moving institutional logics forward: Emotion and meaningful material practice. Organization Studies, 39(4), pp. 515–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, R., & Mohr, J. 2004. Matters of Culture: Cultural Sociology in Practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Furnari, S. 2014. Interstitial spaces: Microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), pp. 439–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Y. 2000. Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions, and Fantasies: Facts, Fictions, and Fantasies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallo, C. 2016. The Storyteller’s Secret: From TED Speakers to Business Legends, Why Some Ideas Catch On and Others Don’t. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A. 1988. Political discourse and collective action. International Social Movement Research, 1(2), pp. 219–244.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A. 1992. Talking Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Gartner, W. B. 2007. Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), pp. 613–627.Google Scholar
Gartner, W. B., Bird, B. J., & Starr, J. A. 1992. Acting as if: Differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(3), pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
Gartner, W. B., & Carter, N. M. 2003. Entrepreneurial behavior and firm organizing processes. In Acs, Z. J. & Audretsch, D. B., eds., Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction. Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 195–221. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/0–387-24519–7_9.Google Scholar
Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. P. 2014. Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective. Research Policy, 43(7), pp. 1177–1188.Google Scholar
Garud, R., & Giuliani, A. P. 2013. A narrative perspective on entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), pp. 157–160.Google Scholar
Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. 2014. Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5), pp. 1479–1492.Google Scholar
Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. Forthcoming. Generative imitation, strategic distancing and optimal distinctiveness during the growth, decline and stabilization of Silicon Alley. Innovation: Organization and Management.Google Scholar
Gasse, Y., 1982. Elaborations on the psychology of the entrepreneur. Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gegenhuber, T., and Naderer, S. Forthcoming. When the petting zoo spawns into monsters: Open dialogue and a venture’s legitimacy quest in crowdfunding. Innovation: Organization and Management.Google Scholar
Gehman, J., & Soublière, J.-F. 2017. Cultural entrepreneurship: from making culture to cultural making. Innovation, 19(1), pp. 61–73.Google Scholar
Gehman, J., Treviño, L. K., & Garud, R. (2013). Values work: a process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Academy of Management Journal, doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0628, 56, 84–112.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gilsing, V., et al. 2008. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37(10), pp. 1717–1731.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. 2000. Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp. 63–81. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=2791603&site=bsi-live.Google Scholar
Giorgi, S. 2017. The mind and heart of resonance: The role of cognition and emotions in frame effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), pp. 711–738.Google Scholar
Giorgi, S., Guider, M. E., & Bartunek, J. M. 2014. Productive resistance: A study of change, emotions, and identity in the context of the Apostolic Visitation of US women religious, 2008–2012. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 41, pp. 259–300.Google Scholar
Giorgi, S., Lockwood, C., & Glynn, M. A. 2015. The many faces of culture: Making sense of 30 years of research on culture in organization studies. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Glaser, V. L. Forthcoming. Design performances: How organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Academy of Management Journal.Google Scholar
Glaser, V. L., Fiss, P. C., and Kennedy, M. T. 2016. Making snowflakes like stocks: Stretching, bending, and positioning to make financial market analogies work in online advertising. Organization Science, 27(4), 1029–1048.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A. Forthcoming. Living the Lifestyle: The Cultural Impact of Martha Stewart. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A. 2017. Theorizing the identity–institution relationship: Considering identity as antecedent to, consequence of, and mechanism for, processes of institutional change. In Greenwood, R. et al., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A. 2011. The “Martha” moment: Wading into others’ worlds. In Carlsen, A. & Dutton, J., eds., Research Alive: Generative Moments for Doing Qualitative Research, chapter 9, pp. 63–66. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A. 2008. Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. In Sahlin-Andersson, K. et al., eds., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London, UK: Sage Publications, pp. 413–430.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A. 2000. When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3, Special Issue: Cultural Industries: Learning from Evolving Organizational Practices), pp. 285–298.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A., & Abzug, R. 2002. Institutionalizing identity: Symbolic isomorphism and organizational names. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), pp. 267–280.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A., & Abzug, R. 1998. Isomorphism and competitive differentiation in the organizational name game. Advances in Strategic Management, 1998, 15, pp. 105–128.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A., & Dowd, T. 2008. Charisma (un)bound: Emotive leadership In Martha Stewart Living Magazine, 1990–2004. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, pp. 71–93.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. 2005. From the critics’ corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), pp. 1031–1055.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A., & Navis, C. 2013. Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), pp. 1124–1137.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma; Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Golsorkhi, D., Leca, B., Lounsbury, M., & Ramirez, C. 2009. Analysing, accounting for and unmasking domination: On our role as scholars of practice, practitioners of social science and public intellectuals. Organization, 16, pp. 779–797.Google Scholar
Graddy, E., & Wang, L. 2009. Community foundation development and social capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(3), pp. 392–412.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), pp. 481–510. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/2780199.Google Scholar
Granqvist, N., Grodal, S., & Woolley, J. L. 2013. Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organization Science, 24(2), pp. 395–413.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., et al. 2017. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. SAGE.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), pp. 1022–1054. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/259163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., & Lounsbury, M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. 1992. Introduction to “output measurement in the service sectors.” In Output Measurement in the Service Sectors. University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Grimes, M. G. 2018. The pivot: How founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 61, pp. 1692–1717.Google Scholar
Griswold, W. 1994. Cultures and Societies in a Changing World, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Haans, R. F. J. Forthcoming. What’s the value of being different when everyone is? The effects of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous versus heterogeneous categories. Strategic Management Journal.Google Scholar
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. 2001. The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Hannigan, T. 2015. Close encounters of the conceptual kind: Disambiguating social structure from text. Big Data & Society, 2(2), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. 2010. Discourse, field-configuring events, and change in organizations and institutional fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm Convention. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), pp. 1365–1392.Google Scholar
Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. 2008. Institutional entrepreneurship. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 198–217.Google Scholar
Harmon, D. Forthcoming. When the Fed speaks: Arguments, emotions, and the microfoundations of institutions. Administrative Science Quarterly.Google Scholar
Harmon, D., Green, S., & Goodnight, G. 2015. A model of rhetorical legitimation: The structure of communication and cognition underlying institutional maintenance and change. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), pp. 76–95.Google Scholar
Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 716–749.Google Scholar
Hays, S. 2000. Constructing the centrality of culture and deconstructing sociology. Contemporary Sociology, 29, pp. 594–602.Google Scholar
Hayward, M. L. A., Rindova, V. P., & Pollock, T. G. 2004. Believing One’s Own Press: The Causes and Consequences of. Strategic Management Journal, 25, pp. 637–653. Available at: www.interscience.wiley.com.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E., et al. 2007. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Wiley-Blackwell; 1st edition (January 16, 2007).Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. 2009. Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, 7(1), pp. 91–102.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. 2000. Cultural industries revisited. Organization Science, 11(3), pp. 356–361.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. 1972. Processing fads and fashions: An organization-set analysis of cultural industry systems. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), pp. 639–659.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. 1997. Sociology without social structure: New institutional theory meets brave new world. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), pp. 1702–1723.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. M., & Lounsbury, M. 1997. Putting the organization back into organization theory: Action, change, and the “new” institutionalism. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6(1), pp. 79–88.Google Scholar
Hitt, M.A., et al. 2002. Strategic entrepreneurship: Integrating entrepreneurial and strategic management perspectives. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Hjorth, D., & Steyaert, C. (Eds.) 2004. Narrative and discursive approaches in entrepreneurship: A second movements in entrepreneurship book. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences : International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Höllerer, M. A., Daudigeos, T., & Jancsary, D. (Eds.). 2018. Multimodality, meaning, and institutions. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 54(A-B). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoselitz, B. F. 1963. Entrepreneurship and traditional elites. Explorations in Economic History, 1(1), p. 36.Google Scholar
Hughes, K. D., & Jennings, J. E. 2015. Women’s entrepreneurship. In Griffen, R., ed. Oxford Bibliographies in Management. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ibarra, H., & Barbulescu, R. 2010. Identity as narrative: Prevalence, effectiveness, and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), pp. 135–154.Google Scholar
Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. 2003. A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), pp. 963–989.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B. 1986. Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. 2002. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. E., et al. 2015. Emotional arousal and entrepreneurial outcomes: Combining qualitative methods to elaborate theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. 2013. Research on women entrepreneurs: challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), pp. 663–715.Google Scholar
Johnson, V. 2007. What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), pp. 97–127.Google Scholar
Jones, C., Lorenzen, M., & Sapsed, J. 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Creative Industries, Oxford Handbooks.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. 2015. Mixing qualitative and quantitative research methods. In Elsbach, K. & Kramer, R., eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods. Taylor & Francis, pp. 423–433.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S., & Vakili, K. 2015. The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), pp. 1435–1457.Google Scholar
Kazanjian, R. K., Drazin, R., & Glynn, M. A. 2002. Implementing strategies for corporate entrepreneurship: A knowledge-based perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset, pp. 173–199.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. T. 2005. Behind the one-way mirror: Refraction in the construction of product market categories. POETICS, 33, pp. 201–226.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. T., & Fiss, P. C. 2013. An ontological turn in categories research: From standards of legitimacy to evidence of actuality. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), pp. 1138–1154.Google Scholar
Kenney, M. 2000. Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Khaire, M. 2017. Culture and Commerce: The Value of Entrepreneurship in Creative Industries. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 1979. Perception, Opportunity, and Profit. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Kolb, B. 2015. Entrepreneurship for the Creative and Cultural Industries. Routledge.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, S., et al. 2016. A tale of two Kirzners: Time, uncertainty, and the “nature” of opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), pp. 867–889. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/etap.12151.Google Scholar
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 840.Google Scholar
Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. 1996. Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61(5) pp. 812–836.Google Scholar
Kroto, H. W., et al. 1985. C60: Buckminsterfullerene. Nature, 318(6042), pp. 162–163.Google Scholar
Kubal, T. J. 1998. The presentation of political self. The Sociological Quarterly, 39(4), pp. 539–554.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. 1978. Science and pseudoscience. Philosophical Papers, 1, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Lamont, M., & Lareau, A. 1988. Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6(2), pp. 153–168. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/202113.Google Scholar
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. 2002. The study of boundaries across the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, pp. 167–195.Google Scholar
Lampel, J., & Meyer, A. D. 2008. Guest editors’ introduction: Field-configuring events as structuring mechanisms: How conferences, ceremonies, and trade shows constitute new technologies, industries, and markets. Journal of Management Studies, 45(6), pp. 1025–1035.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. 2006. Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg, S. R. et al., eds., The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Limited, pp. 215–254.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, C., & Oakley, K. 1999. The Independents: Britain’s New Cultural Entrepreneurs, Demos.Google Scholar
Lee, B. H., Hiatt, S. R., & Lounsbury, M. 2017. Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organization Science, 28: pp. 447–470.Google Scholar
Lieber, C. 2003. Harvard’s Charles M. Lieber: An inside line on nanowires. Science Watch, 14, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Light, I. H., & Rosenstein, C. N. 1995. Race, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship in Urban America. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lingo, E. L., & O’Mahony, S. 2010. Nexus Work: Brokerage on Creative Projects. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), pp. 47–81. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=50051945&site=bsi-live.Google Scholar
Lippert, B. 1995. Our Martha, ourselves. New York Magazine. Available at: http://nymag.com/news/media/48253/.Google Scholar
Lizardo, O. 2014. Omnivorousness as the bridging of cultural holes: A measurement strategy. Theory and Society, 43(3–4), pp.395–419.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M. 2007. A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), pp. 289–307.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M. 1998. Collective entrepreneurship: The mobilization of college and university recycling coordinators. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11, pp. 50–69.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., & Beckman, C. M. 2015. Celebrating organization theory. Journal of Management Studies, 52(2), pp. 288–308.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., & Boxenbaum, E. 2013. Institutional logics in action. In Institutional Logics in Action, Part A. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., Cornelissen, J., Granqvist, N., & Grodal, S. Forthcoming. Culture, innovation and entrepreneurship. Innovation: Organization and Management.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. 2007. New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), pp. 993–1012.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), p. 545.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., & Rao, H. 2004. Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Social Forces, 82(3), pp. 969–999.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., & Ventresca, M. 2003. The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization, 10(3), pp. 457–480.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M., & Hirsch, P. M. 2003. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1(1), pp. 71–104.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., Wry, T., & Devereaux Jennings, P. 2010. The politics of neglect: Path selection and development in nanotechnology innovation. In Spanning Boundaries and Disciplines: University Technology Commercialization in the Idea Age. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 27–58.Google Scholar
Lux Venture Capital. 2006 “The nanotech report: Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology, 4th Ed.”Google Scholar
Mantere, S., et al. 2013. Narrative attributions of entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), pp. 459–473.Google Scholar
Markusen, A. 2013. Fuzzy concepts, proxy data: why indicators would not track creative placemaking success. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 17(3), pp. 291–303.Google Scholar
Marquis, C., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. 2011. Community as an institutional order and type of organizing. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 33, ix–xxvii.Google Scholar
Martens, M. L., Jennings, J. E., & Jennings, P. D. 2007. Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), pp. 1107–1132.Google Scholar
Martin, J. 1992. Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. L. 2003. What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Martinelli, A. 1994. Entrepreneurship and management. The Handbook of Economic Sociology, pp. 476–503.Google Scholar
Massa, F. G., Helms, W. S., Voronov, M., & Wang, L. (2017). Emotions uncorked: Inspiring evangelism for the emerging practice of cool-climate winemaking in Ontario. Academy of Management Journal, doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0092, 60, 461–499.Google Scholar
McDonald, R., & Eisenhardt, K. Forthcoming. Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and the search for a viable business model. Administrative Science Quarterly.Google Scholar
McDonald, R., & Gao, C. 2017 (July–August). Entrepreneurship: Every pivot needs a story. Harvard Business Review, 95: 24.Google Scholar
McMullen, J. S., Plummer, L. A., & Acs, Z. J. 2007. What is an entrepreneurial opportunity? Small Business Economics, 28(4), pp. 273–283.Google Scholar
McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. 2006. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), pp. 132–152.Google Scholar
McPherson, C. M., & Sauder, M. 2013. Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), pp. 165–196.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. 1932. The Philosophy of the Present 1980 ed., University of Chicago Press. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?id=nLiVDAEACAAJ.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., et al. 1997. World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), pp. 144–181.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. 1987. Ontology and rationalization in the western cultural account. Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual, pp. 12–37.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), pp. 340–363.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. 1983. Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 199–215.Google Scholar
Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. 2010. Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), pp. 1241–1262.Google Scholar
Micelotta, E., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. 2017. Pathways of institutional change: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 43: pp. 1885–1910Google Scholar
Milkie, M. A., & Denny, K. E. 2014. Changes in the cultural model of father involvement: Descriptions of benefits to fathers, children, and mothers in Parents’ Magazine, 1926–2006. Journal of Family Issues, 35(2), pp. 223–253.Google Scholar
Mische, A. 2014. Measuring futures in action: Projective grammars in the Rio+ 20 debates. Theory and Society, 43(3–4), pp. 437–464.Google Scholar
Mische, A. 2009. Projects and possibilities: Researching futures in action. In Sociological Forum. Wiley Online Library, pp. 694–704.Google Scholar
Mische, A., & Pattison, P. 2000. Composing a civic arena: Publics, projects, and social settings. Poetics, 27(2–3), pp. 163–194.Google Scholar
MIT Technology Review. March 1, 2001. Wires of Wonder. www.technologyreview.com/s/400912/wires-of-wonder/ (Accessed on October 27, 2018).Google Scholar
Mody, C. 2011. Instrumental Community: Probe Microscopy and the Path to Nanotechnology. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mohr, J. W. 1998. Measuring meaning structures. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp. 345–370.Google Scholar
Mohr, J. W., & Ghaziani, A. 2014. Problems and prospects of measurement in the study of culture. Theory and Society, 43(3–4), pp. 225–246.Google Scholar
Mohr, J. W., & Guerra-Pearson, F. 2010. The duality of niche and form: The differentiation of institutional space in New York City, 1888–1917. In Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 321–368.Google Scholar
Mohr, J. W., & White, H. C. 2008. How to model an institution. Theory and Society, 37(5), pp. 485–512.Google Scholar
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. 2010. How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), pp. 439–471.Google Scholar
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. 2011. Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), pp. 479–499.Google Scholar
Nicholls, A. 2010. The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: reflexive isomorphism in a pre‐paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), pp. 611–633.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, D. 2005. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), pp. 100–130. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=17521509&site=bsi-live.Google Scholar
Ocasio, W., Mauskapf, M., & Steele, C. W. J. 2016. History, society, and institutions: The role of collective memory in the emergence and evolution of societal logics. Academy of Management Review, 41(4): 676–699.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1996. Distinguished lecture on economics in government: Big bills left on the sidewalk: Why some nations are rich, and others poor. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, pp. 3–24Google Scholar
Pachucki, M. A., & Breiger, R. L. 2010. Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. 2012. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pahnke, E. C., Katila, R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2015. Who takes you to the dance? How partners’ institutional logics influence innovation in young firms. Administrative Science Quarterly. 60(4): pp. 596–633.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Pedersen, J. S., & Dobbin, F. 2006. In search of identity and legitimation: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), pp. 897–907.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. A. 1978. The production of cultural change: The case of contemporary country music. Social Research, 45(2), pp. 292–314. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/40970334.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. A. 1977. The Production of Culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 1981. Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
Philippe, D., & Durand, R. 2011. The impact of norm‐conforming behaviors on firm reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 32(9), pp. 969–993.Google Scholar
Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. 1997. Managing multiple identities: Discourse, legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization, 4(2), pp. 159–185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849742002.Google Scholar
PinchotIII, G. 1985. Intrapreneuring: Why You Don’t Have to Leave the Corporation to Become an Entrepreneur. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M., & Stuart, T. E. 1995. A role-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), pp. 1224–1260.Google Scholar
Poletta, F. 2006. It Was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1996. What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Portes, A. 1995. The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. 2008. Microfoundations of institutional theory. In Sahlin-Andersson, K. et al., eds., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London, UK: Sage Publications, p. 298.Google Scholar
Rao, H. 1994. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), pp. 29–44.Google Scholar
Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. 2005. Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. American Sociological Review, 70(6), pp. 968–991.Google Scholar
Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. 2003. Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), pp. 795–843.Google Scholar
Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. 2000. Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, pp. 237–281.Google Scholar
Ravasi, D., & Rindova, V. 2008. Symbolic value creation. Handbook of New Approaches to Organization, pp. 270–284.Google Scholar
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. 2009. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30, pp. 629–652.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1991. Narrative identity. Philosophy Today, pp. 73–81.Google Scholar
Rindova, V., & Fombrun, C. 2001. The growth of the specialty coffee niche in the U.S. coffee industry. In Bird-Schoonhoven, K. & Romanelli, E., eds., The Entrepreneurship Dynamic. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rindova, V. P., Petkova, A. P., & Kotha, S. 2007. Standing out: how new firms in emerging markets build reputation. Strategic Organization, 5(1), pp. 31–70.Google Scholar
Rindova, V. P., Pollock, T. G., & Hayward, M. L. A. 2006. Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), pp. 50–71.Google Scholar
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), pp. 287–306.Google Scholar
Ruef, M. 1999. The dynamics of organizational forms: Creating market actors in the healthcare field, 1966–94. Social Forces, 77(4), pp. 1405–1434.Google Scholar
Ruef, M. 2000. The emergence of organizational forms: A community ecology approach. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), pp. 658–714. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/318963.Google Scholar
Ruef, M. 2010. The Entrepreneurial Group: Social Identities, Relations, and Collective Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. 2003. The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68(2), pp. 195–222. Available at: http://proxy.bc.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/218822087?accountid=9673.Google Scholar
Ruef, M., & Lounsbury, M. 2007. Introduction: The sociology of entrepreneurship. In The Sociology of Entrepreneurship. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. 1998. A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), pp. 877–904. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/2393619.Google Scholar
Sanders, M. 2007. Scientific paradigms, entrepreneurial opportunities and cycles in economic growth. Small Business Economics, 28(4), pp. 339–354.Google Scholar
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2009. Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), pp. 643–671.Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. 2008. Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. New Horizon, Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 2000 (1938). Nausea. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. 2003. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Savigny, E. v. (Eds.). 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. 2006. The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24(3), pp. 195–227. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/25046721.Google Scholar
Schneiberg, M., & Lounsbury, M. 2017. Social movements and the dynamics of institutions and organizations. In Greenwood, R. et al., eds., Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, pp. 297–327.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. 1951. Choosing among projects of action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 12, pp. 161–184.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. 1968. Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
Scott, P. 1995. The Meanings of Mass Higher Education. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 2014. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Seidel, M.-D. L., & Greve, H. R. 2017. Emergence: How novelty, growth, and formation shape organizations and their ecosystems. In Emergence. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Seidel, V. P., & O’Mahony, S. 2014. Managing the repertoire: Stories, metaphors, prototypes, and concept coherence in product innovation. Organization Science, 25(3), pp. 691–712.Google Scholar
Seidel, V. P., Hannigan, T. R., & Phillips, N. Forthcoming. Rumor communities, social media, and forthcoming innovations: The shaping of technological frames in product market evolution. Academy of Management Review.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. H. 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. 1979. Imagination and the Nature of Choice. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Shane, S. A. 2003. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp. 217–226.Google Scholar
Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. 1982. The social dimensions of entrepreneurship.Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 72–90.Google Scholar
Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. 2017. Trailblazing in Entrepreneurship: Creating New Paths for Understanding the Field. Springer.Google Scholar
Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Wolfe, M., 2011. Moving forward from project failure: Negative emotions, affective commitment, and learning from the experience. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), pp. 1229–1259.Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J. 2017. Narrative economics. The American Economic Review, 107(4), pp. 967–1004.Google Scholar
Shrum, W. 1991. Critics and publics: Cultural mediation in highbrow and popular performing arts. American Journal of Sociology, 97(2), pp. 347–375.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. 1990. The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simmel, G., & Wolff, K. H. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Sine, W. D., David, R. J., & Mitsuhashi, H. 2007. From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organization Science, 18(4), pp. 578–594.Google Scholar
Sine, W. D., & Lee, B. H. 2009. Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), pp. 123–155. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/27749308.Google Scholar
Slade Shantz, A., Kistruck, G., & Zietsma, C. 2018. The opportunity not taken: The occupational identity of entrepreneurs in contexts of poverty. Journal of Business Venturing, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.02.003.Google Scholar
Smets, M., Aristidou, A., & Whittington, R. 2017. Towards a practice-driven institutionalism. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R., eds., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. London: Sage, pp. 384–411.Google Scholar
Smircich, L. 1983. Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), pp. 339–358. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3980622&site=bsi-live.Google Scholar
Snow, D. A., et al. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), pp. 464–481.Google Scholar
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), pp. 197–217.Google Scholar
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. 1992. Master frames and cycles of protest. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, 133, p. 155.Google Scholar
de Solla Price, D. 1965. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Somers, M. R. 1993. Citizenship and the place of the public sphere: law, community, and political culture in the transition to democracy. American Sociological Review, pp. 587–620.Google Scholar
Sorin, G. S., & Sessions, L. A. 2015. Case Studies in Cultural Entrepreneurship How to Create Relevant and Sustainable Institutions · American Association for State and Local History. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Spillman, L. 2002. Introduction: Culture and cultural sociology. Cultural Sociology, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Stark, R. 2007. Sociology. Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. 1989. Team Entrepreneurship, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. 1997. (April), Letter. Martha Stewart Living, p. 12.Google Scholar
Stokes, R., & Hewitt, J. P. 1976. Aligning actions. American Sociological Review, 41: 838–849.Google Scholar
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. 1993. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), pp. 487–511.Google Scholar
Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. 1998. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), pp. 265–290.Google Scholar
Stryker, R. 1994. Rules, resources, and legitimacy processes: Some implications for social conflict, order, and change. American Journal of Sociology, 99(4), pp. 847–910.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp. 571–610.Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. 1991. Major traditions of economic sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), pp. 251–276. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001343.Google Scholar
Swidler, A. 1986. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), pp. 273–286.Google Scholar
Swidler, A. 2001. What anchors cultural practices. In Knorr-Cetina, K., Schatzki, T. R., & von Savigny, E., eds., The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 74–92.Google Scholar
Tavory, I., & Eliasoph, N. 2013. Coordinating futures: toward a theory of anticipation. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), pp. 908–942.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H. 1999. The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), pp. 19–46.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H., & Flynn, K. H. 2003. Networks, geographies, and entrepreneurship. In Acs, Z. J. & Audretsch, D. B., eds., The Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. 1983. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 22–39.Google Scholar
Toubiana, M., & Zietsma, C. 2017. The message is on the wall: Emotions, social media, and the dynamics of institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 922–953.Google Scholar
Tracey, P., Dalpaiz, E., & Phillips, N. 2018. Fish out of water: Translation, legitimation, and new venture creation. Academy of Management Journal, 61, pp. 1627–1666.Google Scholar
Überbacher, F. 2014. Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), pp. 667–698.Google Scholar
Überbacher, F., Jacobs, C. D., & Cornelissen, J. P. 2015. How entrepreneurs become skilled cultural operators. Organization Studies, 36(7), pp. 925–951.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., Sonenshein, S., & Boje, D., 2016. Narratives as sources of stability and change in organizations: Approaches and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), pp. 495–560.Google Scholar
van Werven, R., Bouwmeester, O., & Cornelissen, J. P. 2015. The power of arguments: How entrepreneurs convince stakeholders of the legitimate distinctiveness of their ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), pp. 616–631.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, S. 2000. Note the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. University of Maryland. Review Literature and Arts of the Americas, 25(1), pp. 217–226. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/259388.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, S. 1997. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3(1), pp. 119–138.Google Scholar
Voronov, M. 2014. Toward a toolkit for emotionalizing institutional theory. Research on Emotion in Organizations, 10, pp. 167–196.Google Scholar
Voronov, M., De Clercq, D., & Hinings, C. R. 2013. Conformity and distinctiveness in a global institutional framework: The legitimation of Ontario fine wine. Journal of Management Studies, 50 (4), pp. 607–645.Google Scholar
Voronov, M., & Vince, R. 2012. Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37 (1): pp. 58–81Google Scholar
Voronov, M., & Weber, K. 2017. Emotional competence, institutional ethos and the heart of institutions. Academy of Management Review, 42 (1): pp. 556–560.Google Scholar
Voss, K., 1998. Claim making and the framing of defeats: The interpretation of losses by American and British Labor Activists, 1886–1895. Challenging Authority: The Historical Study of Contentious Politics, pp. 136–148.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1997. Social Network analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, K. 2005. A toolkit for analyzing corporate cultural toolkits. Poetics, 33(3), pp. 227–252.Google Scholar
Weber, K., & Dacin, M. T. 2011. The cultural construction of organizational life: Introduction to the special issue. Organization Science, 22(2), pp. 287–298.Google Scholar
Weber, K., Heinze, K. L., & DeSoucey, M. 2008. Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), pp. 529–567.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., & Browning, L. D. 1986. Argument and narration in organizational communication. Journal of Management, 12(2), pp. 243–259.Google Scholar
Westphal, J., & Park, S. H. forthcoming. Symbolic Management: Governance, Strategy, and Institutions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2000. Developing Management Skills for Europe. 2nd ed. Financial Times/ Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A., & Godfrey, P. C. 1998. Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations. Sage.Google Scholar
White, H. C. 1992. Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. J. 2008. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London, England: SAGE, pp. 130–147.Google Scholar
Wry, T., et al. 2010. Institutional sources of technological knowledge: a community perspective on nanotechnology emergence. In Technology and Organization: Essays in Honour of Joan Woodward. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 149–176.Google Scholar
Wry, T., & Lounsbury, M. 2013. Contextualizing the categorical imperative: Category linkages, technology focus, and resource acquisition in nanotechnology entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), pp. 117–133.Google Scholar
Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. 2011. Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22(2), pp. 449–463.Google Scholar
Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. 2011. The cultural context of status: Generating important knowledge in nanotechnology. Status in Management and Organizations, pp. 155–190.Google Scholar
Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Jennings, P. D. 2014. Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), pp. 1309–1333.Google Scholar
Yoon, B., & Park, Y. 2005. A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(2), pp. 145–160.Google Scholar
Zald, M. N., & Lounsbury, M. 2010. The wizards of Oz: Towards an institutional approach to elites, expertise and command posts. Organization Studies, 31(7), pp. 963–996.Google Scholar
Zhao, E., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. 2017. Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, no. 38: 93–113.Google Scholar
Zhao, E. Y., Ishihara, M., & Lounsbury, M. 2013. Overcoming the illegitimacy discount: Cultural entrepreneurship in the US feature film industry. Organization Studies, 34(12), 1747–1776.Google Scholar
Zhou, M. 2004. Revisiting ethnic entrepreneurship: Convergencies, controversies, and conceptual advancements 1. International Migration Review, 38(3), pp. 1040–1074. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747–7379.2004.tb00228.x.Google Scholar
Zietsma, C., & Toubiana, M. 2018. The constitutive, the energetic and the valuable: Exploring the impact and importance of studying emotions and institutions. Organization Studies, 39, 427–443.Google Scholar
Zietsma, C., et al. 2017. Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Academy of Management Annals 11(1), 391–450.Google Scholar
Zilber, T. B. 2007. Stories and the discursive dynamics of institutional entrepreneurship: The case of Israeli high-tech after the bubble. Organization Studies, 28(7), pp. 1035–1054.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. 2002. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), pp. 414–431.Google Scholar
Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), pp. 70–105. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/20109903.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. 2007. Nanobank Data Description, Release 1.0 (Betatest). UCLA Center for International Science, Technology, and Cultural Policy and Nanobank.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R., Furner, J., Liu, R. C., & Ma, H. 2007. Minerva unbound: Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Research Policy, 36(6), pp. 850–863.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. 2016. Optimal distinctiveness revisited: An integrative framework for understanding the balance between differentiation and conformity in individual and organizational identities. In Pratt, M. G. et al., eds. Oxford Handbook on Organizational Identity, pp. 283–299.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. 1999. The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), pp. 1398–1438.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. 2017. The categorical imperative revisited: Implications of categorization as a theoretical tool. In From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 31–68.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Cultural Entrepreneurship
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Cultural Entrepreneurship
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Cultural Entrepreneurship
Available formats
×