Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:01:43.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Applied Evolutionary Science

The Evolution of Reputation-Based Cooperation

A Goal Framing Theory of Gossip

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2023

Rafael Wittek  and
Francesca Giardini
Rafael Wittek
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Francesca Giardini
Affiliation:
University of Groningen

Summary

Gossiping and its reputation effects are viewed as the most powerful mechanism to sustain cooperation without the intervention of formal authorities. Being virtually costless, gossiping is highly effective in monitoring and sanctioning norm violators. Rational individuals cooperate in order to avoid negative reputations. But this narrative is incomplete and often leads to wrong predictions. Goal Framing Theory, a cognitive-behavioral approach anchored in evolutionary research, provides a better explanatory framework. Three overarching goal frames (hedonic, gain, and normative) constantly compete for being in our cognitive foreground. This Element argues that for gossip to have reputation effects, a salient normative goal frame is required. But since the hedonic mindset usually trumps gain and normative concerns, most gossip will be driven by hedonic motives and therefore not have strong reputation effects. Propositions on cultural, structural, dispositional, situational, and technological gossip antecedents and consequences are developed and illustrated with evidence from the empirical record.
Get access

Keywords

Gossipreputationcooperationgoal framingevolution
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Applied Evolutionary Science
Online ISBN: 9781009217521
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 21 December 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agneessens, F., & Wittek, R. (2012). Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Social Networks, 34(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiello, J. R., & Kolb, K. J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.3.339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akande, A., & Odewale, F. (1994). One more time: How to stop company rumours. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 15(4), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739410059881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. D. (1987). The Biology of Moral Systems. Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Andreozzi, L., Ploner, M., & Saral, A. S. (2020). The stability of conditional cooperation: Beliefs alone cannot explain the decline of cooperation in social dilemmas. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 13610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70681-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apicella, C. L., & Silk, J. B. (2019). The evolution of human cooperation. Current Biology, 29(11), R447–R450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babić Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2016). The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. S., & Jones, M. A. (1996). The poison grapevine: How destructive are gossip and rumor in the workplace? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920070108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, P. (2016). Biological markets and the effects of partner choice on cooperation and friendship. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, P., & Barker, J. L. (2020). Greener than thou: People who protect the environment are more cooperative, compete to be environmental, and benefit from reputation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardsley, N., & Sausgruber, R. (2005). Conformity and reciprocity in public good provision. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(5), 664–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1992). Beneath new culture is old psychology: Gossip and social stratification. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (pp. 627–637). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, P., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Tinbergen’s four questions: An appreciation and an update. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(12), 712–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., Zhang, L., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Why people gossip: An empirical analysis of social motives, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2640–2670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00956.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beersma, B., Van Kleef, G. A., & Dijkstra, M. T. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of gossip in work groups. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 417–434). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ben-Ze’ev, A., & Goodman, R. F. (Eds.). (1994). Good Gossip. University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2014). An epistemological analysis of gossip and gossip-based knowledge. Synthese, 191(17), 4037–4067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0514-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C. (2017). Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1963). The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (2019). Gossip and reputation in small-scale societies. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 253–274). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.14.Google Scholar
Boero, R. (2019). Neuroscientific methods. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 118–131). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.7.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00087-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In Buckingham, D. (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (pp. 119–142). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2006). Solving the puzzle of human cooperation. In Levinson, S. & Jaisson, P. (Eds.), Evolution and Culture: A Fyssen Foundation Symposium (pp. 105–132). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, W., Mclaughlin, K., Doan, T., & Crockett, M. (2021). How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks. Science Advances, 7, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenneis, D. (1984). Grog and gossip in Bhatgaon: Style and substance in Fiji Indian conversation. American Ethnologist, 11(3), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1984.11.3.02a00050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brison, K. J. (1992). Just Talk: Gossip, Meetings, and Power in a Papua New Guinea Village. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brondino, N., Fusar-Poli, L., & Politi, P. (2017). Something to talk about: Gossip increases oxytocin levels in a near real-life situation. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 77, 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.12.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2001). Bandwidth and echo: Trust, information, and gossip in social networks. In Rauch, J. & Casella, A. (Eds.), Networks and Markets (pp. 30–74). Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2009). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Soda, G. (2021). Network capabilities: Brokerage as a bridge between network theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1698–1719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320988764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton-Chellew, M. N., & West, S. A. (2013). Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(1), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210960110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton-Chellew, M. N., Nax, H. H., & West, S. A. (2015). Payoff-based learning explains the decline in cooperation in public goods games. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1801), 20142678. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camerer, C. F., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.2.209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: Causes, constraints, content, and contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capraro, V., Giardini, F., Vilone, D., & Paolucci, M. (2016). Partner selection supported by opaque reputation promotes cooperative behavior. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(6), 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, J. P. (2004). When in Rome: Conformity and the provision of public goods. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(4), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatman, J. A., & Barsade, S. G. (1995). Personality, organizational culture, and cooperation: Evidence from a business simulation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 423–443. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experimental Economics, 14(1), 47–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-010-9257-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiao, J. Y., & Blizinsky, K. D. (2010). Culture–gene coevolution of individualism–collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1681), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and actor-observer bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298249003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cowden, C. C. (2012) Game Theory, Evolutionary Stable Strategies and the Evolution of Biological Interactions. Nature Education Knowledge, 3(10), 6. www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/game-theory-evolutionary-stable-strategies-and-the-25953132/.Google Scholar
Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behaviour 1(11), 769–771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dana, J., Weber, R. A., & Kuang, J. X. (2007). Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, 33(1), 67–80. www.jstor.org/stable/27822583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R., & Henderson, R. (2000). Electronic performance monitoring: A laboratory investigation of the influence of monitoring and difficulty on task performance, mood state, and self-reported stress levels. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(5), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02502.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A., Vaillancourt, T., Arnocky, S., & Doyel, R. (2019). Women’s gossip as an intrasexual competition strategy. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 303–321). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.16.Google Scholar
De Backer, C. (2005). Like Belgian chocolate for the universal mind: Interpersonal and media gossip from an evolutionary perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ghent: Ghent University, Belgium.Google Scholar
De Clercq, D. (2022). Exposure to workplace bullying and negative gossip behaviors: Buffering roles of personal and contextual resources. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(3), 859–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Clercq, D., Haq, I. U., & Azeem, M. U. (2019). Gossiping about outsiders: How time-related work stress among collectivistic employees hinders job performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.56.Google Scholar
Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407–1424. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Den Bak, I. M., & Ross, H. S. (1996). I’m telling! The content, context, and consequences of children’s tattling on their siblings. Social Development, 5(3), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1996.tb00087.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekmann, A., & Przepiorka, W. (2019). Trust and reputation in markets. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 383–400). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.20.Google Scholar
Diekmann, A., Jann, B., Przepiorka, W., & Wehrli, S. (2014). Reputation formation and the evolution of cooperation in anonymous online markets. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413512316.Google Scholar
Do Canto, N. R., Grunert, K. G., & Dutra de Barcellos, M. (2023). Goal-framing theory in environmental behaviours: Review, future research agenda and possible applications in behavioural change. Journal of Social Marketing, 13(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-03-2021-0058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dores Cruz, T. D., Nieper, A. S., Testori, M., Martinescu, E., & Beersma, B. (2021). An integrative definition and framework to study gossip. Group & Organization Management, 46(2), 252–285. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b8x57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dores Cruz, T. D., Thielmann, I., Columbus, S., et al. (2021). Gossip and reputation in everyday life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), 20200301. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duca, S., & Nax, H. H. (2018). Groups and scores: The decline of cooperation. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 15(144), 20180158. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. I. (1997). Groups, gossip, and the evolution of language. In: Schmitt, A., Atzwanger, K., Grammer, K., Schäfer, K. (eds) New Aspects of Human Ethology. Springer, Boston, MA (pp. 77–89). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34289-4_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. (2009). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 36(5), 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460902960289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. I. M., Marriott, A., & Duncan, N. D. C. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. I. (1996). Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (1990). Cooperative competition in adolescent “girl talk.” Discourse Processes, 13(1), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eder, D., & Enke, J. L. (1991). The structure of gossip: Opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, 56(4), 494–508. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, N., & Scotson, J. L. (1994). The Established and the Outsiders. Sage.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. (1991). Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellwardt, L. (2019). Gossip and reputation in social networks. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 435–457). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.23.Google Scholar
Ellwardt, L., Steglich, C., & Wittek, R. (2012). The co-evolution of gossip and friendship in workplace social networks. Social Networks, 34(4), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emler, N. (1994). Gossip, reputation, and social adaptation. In Goodman, R. F. & Ben-Ze’ev, A. (Eds.), Good Gossip (pp. 117–138). Kansas University Press.Google Scholar
Emler, N. (2019). Human sociality and psychological foundations. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 47–68). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.3.Google Scholar
Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Preschoolers affect others’ reputations through prosocial gossip. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, K., Strimling, P., Gelfand, M., et al. (2021). Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21602-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esposito, E., & Stark, D. (2019). What’s observed in a rating? Rankings as orientation in the face of uncertainty. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(4), 3–26. https://doi-org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1177/0263276419826276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etienne, J. (2011). Compliance theory: A goal framing approach. Law & Policy, 33(3), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00340.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, D., & Sutter, M. (2019). Gossip and the efficiency of interactions. Games and Economic Behavior, 113, 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J., & Keltner, D. (2012). The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fine, G. A., & Rosnow, R. L. (1978). Gossip, gossipers, gossiping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727800400135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, M. A., & Peters, K. (2018). Will any gossip do? Gossip does not need to be perfectly accurate to promote trust. Games and Economic Behavior, 107, 253–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.09.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fosgaard, T. R. (2018). Cooperation stability: A representative sample in the lab. IFRO Working Paper No. 2018/08. University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics (IFRO), Copenhagen. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:foi:wpaper:2018_08.Google Scholar
Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, J. R., Raven, B., & Cartwright, D. (1959). The bases of social power. Classics of Organization Theory, 7, 311–320.Google Scholar
Fu, F., Hauert, C., Nowak, M. A., & Wang, L. (2008). Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks. Physical Review E, 78(2), 026117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.026117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabriels, K., & De Backer, C. J. (2016). Virtual gossip: How gossip regulates moral life in virtual worlds. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambetta, D. (1994). Godfather’s gossip. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 35(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600006846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfield, Z. H., Schacht, R., Post, E. R., et al. (2021). The content and structure of reputation domains across human societies: A view from the evolutionary social sciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), 20200296. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelfand, M. J., & Lun, J. (2013). The culture of the situation: The role of situational strength in cultural systems: Situational constraint. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giardini, F. (2012). Deterrence and transmission as mechanisms ensuring reliability of gossip. Cognitive Processing, 13, 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0421-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giardini, F., & Wittek, R. (2019a). Gossip, reputation and sustainable cooperation: Sociological foundations. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 23–46). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giardini, F., & Wittek, R. P. M. (2019b). Silence is golden. Six reasons inhibiting the spread of third-party gossip. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giardini, F., Balliet, D., Power, E. A., Számadó, S., & Takács, K. (2022). Four puzzles of reputation-based cooperation. Human Nature, 33(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-021-09419-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giardini, F., Fitneva, S. A., & Tamm, A. (2019). “Someone told me”: Preemptive reputation protection in communication. PloS One, 14(4), e0200883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giardini, F., Vilone, D., Sánchez, A., & Antonioni, A. (2021). Gossip and competitive altruism support cooperation in a Public Good game. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), 20200303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gintis, H. (2016). Homo Ludens: Social rationality and political behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H., & Fehr, E. (2012). The social structure of cooperation and punishment. Behavioral and Brain Science, 35(1), 28–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluckman, M. (1963). Papers in honor of Melville J. Herskovits: Gossip and scandal. Current Anthropology, 4(3), 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluckman, M. (1968). Psychological, sociological and anthropological explanations of witchcraft and gossip: A clarification. Man, 3(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2799409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1949). Presentation of self in everyday life. American Journal of Sociology, 55, 6–7.Google Scholar
Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, R. F., & Ben-Zeʼev, A. (Eds.) (1994). Good Gossip. University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Mettetal, G. (1986). Speculations about social and affective development: Friendship and acquaintanceship through adolescence. In Gottman, J. M. & Parker, J. G. (Eds.), Conversations of Friends: Speculations on Affective Development (pp. 192–237). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greif, A. (1989). Reputation and coalitions in medieval trade: evidence on the Maghribi traders. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 857–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. (1994). Cultural beliefs and the organization of society: A historical and theoretical reflection on collectivist and individualist societies. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 912–950. https://doi.org/10.1086/261959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2019). The rise and fall of cooperation through reputation and group polarization. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08727-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guala, F. (2012). Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartung, F.-M., Krohn, C., & Pirschtat, M. (2019). Better than its reputation? Gossip and the reasons why we and individuals with “dark” personalities talk about others. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haselton, M. G., Nettle, D., & Murray, D. R. (2015). The evolution of cognitive bias. In Buss, D. (Ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (724–746). Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, D. J., Nowak, M. A., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Punishment does not promote cooperation under exploration dynamics when anti-social punishment is possible. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 360, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.06.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haux, L., Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2017). Do young children preferentially trust gossip or firsthand observation in choosing a collaborative partner? Social Development, 26(3), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, S. J. (2010). Cultural psychology. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 1423–1464). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002037.Google Scholar
Heintz, C., Celse, J., Giardini, F., & Max, S. (2015). Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard. Judgment & Decision Making, 10(5), 442–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500005581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2019). Gossip, reputation, and friendship in within-group competition. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 275–302). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.15.Google Scholar
Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2021). Competitive gossip: The impact of domain, resource value, resource scarcity and coalitions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), 20200305. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
House, B. R., Kanngiesser, P., Barrett, H. C. et al. (2020). Universal norm psychology leads to societal diversity in prosocial behaviour and development. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 36–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hruschka, D. J., & Henrich, J. (2013). Institutions, parasites and the persistence of ingroup preferences. PLoS One, 8(5), e63642. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, N., Pavlou, P. A., & Zhang, J. (2017). On self-selection biases in online product reviews. MIS Quarterly, 41(2), 449–475. www.jstor.org/stable/26629722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, L., & Kelley, L. (2003). Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven-nation study. Organization Science, 14(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.81.12807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, G. P. (2019). Gossip and reputation in childhood. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 131–151). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.8.Google Scholar
Izuma, K. (2012). The social neuroscience of reputation. Neuroscience Research, 72(4), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2012.01.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeuken, E., Beersma, B., ten Velden, F. S., & Dijkstra, M. T. (2015). Aggression as a motive for gossip during conflict: The role of power, social value orientation, and counterpart’s behavior. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8(3), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. M., Schieffelin, B. B., & Smith, R. E. (2011). When friends who talk together stalk together: Online gossip as metacommunication. In Thurlow, C. & Mroczek, K. (Eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media (pp. 26–47). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In MacLean, L. & Ziemba, W. (Eds.),Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I (pp. 99–127). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/8557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kameda, T., Toyokawa, W., & Tindale, R. S. (2022). Information aggregation and collective intelligence beyond the wisdom of crowds. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(6), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00054-y.Google Scholar
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322(5908), 1681–1685. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kniffin, K. M., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). Utilities of gossip across organizational levels: Multilevel selection, free-riders, and teams. Human Nature, 16(3), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-005-1011-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kniffin, K. M., & Sloan Wilson, D. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on workplace gossip: Why and how gossip can serve groups. Group & Organization Management, 35(2), 150–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601109360390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoch, D., Schneider, F., Schunk, D., Hohmann, M., & Fehr, E. (2009). Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(49), 20895–20899. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911619106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G. (2002), Committed compliance, moral self, and internalization: A mediational model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kock, N. (2004). The psychobiological model: Towards a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on Darwinian evolution. Organization Science, 15(3), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 342–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurland, N. B., & Pelled, L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3312928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(26), 15387–15392. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251541498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laidre, M. E., Lamb, A., Shultz, S., & Olsen, M. (2013). Making sense of information in noisy networks: Human communication, gossip, and distortion. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 317, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.09.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanz, H. (1936). Metaphysics of Gossip. International Journal of Ethics, 46(4), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/intejethi.46.4.2989287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, J. M. (2016). The evolutionary advantage of limited network knowledge. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 398, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.03.017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ledyard, O. (1995). Public goods: Some experimental results. In Kagel, H. & Roth, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, S. H., & Barnes, C. M. (2021). An attributional process model of workplace gossip. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(2), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, J., Korstjens, A. H., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007). Group size, grooming and social cohesion in primates. Animal Behavior, 74(6), 1617–1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leimar, O., & Hammerstein, P. (2001). Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268(1468), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1573.Google Scholar
Leinfellner, W. (1998). Game theory, sociodynamics, and cultural evolution. In Leinfellner, W. & Köhler, E. (Eds.), Game Theory, Experience, Rationality. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1997], Vol. 5. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, S. (1981). Rational, repetitive choice: The discrimination model versus the Camilleri–Berger model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(4), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, S. (1985). An assessment of the new political economy: Its potential for the social sciences and for sociology in particular. Sociological Theory, 3(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/202177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, S. (2002). Solidarity, its microfoundations and macrodependence: A framing approach. In Favereau, O. & Lazega, E. (Eds.), Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization: Markets, Networks, and Hierarchies (pp. 282–328). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781952863.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, S. (2015). The third speed: Flexible activation and its link to self-regulation. Review of Behavioral Economics, 2, 147–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, S. (2023). Social rationality and economic sociology. In Zafirovski, M. (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Economic Sociology (pp. 247–270). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780367817152-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, S., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500–525. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0021.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, S., Wittek, R., & Giardini, F. (2020). Reputation effects, embeddedness, and Granovetter’s Error. In Buskens, V., Corten, R., & Snijders, C. (Eds.), Advances in the Sociology of Trust and Cooperation: Theory, Experiments, and Field Studies (pp. 113–140). De Gruyter Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luca, M., & Zervas, G. (2016). Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Science, 62(12), 3412–3427. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, M. T., & Hughes, S. (2015). Malicious mouths? The Dark Triad and motivations for gossip. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manesi, Z., Van Lange, P. A., & Pollet, T. V. (2016). Eyes wide open: Only eyes that pay attention promote prosocial behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916640780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manrique, H. M., Zeidler, H., Roberts, G., et al. (2021). The psychological foundations of reputation-based cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marginson, S., & Van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 306–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303544.Google Scholar
Martinescu, E., Janssen, O., & Nijstad, B. A. (2019). Gossip and emotion. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 152–169). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.9.Google Scholar
Mascaro, O., & Sperber, D. (2009). The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception. Cognition, 112(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masum, H., & Tovey, M. (2011). The Reputation Society: How Online Opinions are Reshaping the Offline World. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Masum, H., & Zhang, Y. (2004). Manifesto for the reputation society. First Monday, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v9i7.1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAndrew, F. T. (2019). Gossip as a social skill. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 173–192). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.10.Google Scholar
McAndrew, F. T., Bell, E. K., & Garcia, C. M. (2007). Who do we tell and whom do we tell on? Gossip as a strategy for status enhancement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(7), 1562–1577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00227.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S. E. (1984). Rethinking gossip and scandal. In Black, D. (Ed.), Toward a General Theory of Social Control (pp. 271–302). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-102801-5.50016-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, E. A. (2010). Gossip Talk and Online Community: Celebrity Gossip Blogs and Their Audiences. Open Access Dissertations. 292. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/292.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (2011). Transcending socialization: A nine-year ethnography of the body’s role in organizational control and knowledge workers’ transformation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 325–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212437519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, G., & Mouly, V. S. (2004). Do loose lips sink ships? The meaning, antecedents and consequences of rumor and gossip in organisations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 9(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280410551114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mielke, A., Preis, A., Samuni, L., et al. (2018). Flexible decision-making in grooming partner choice in sooty mangabeys and chimpanzees. Royal Society Open Science, 5(7), 172143. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgrom, P. R., North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1990). The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Economics & Politics, 2(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1990.tb00020.x.Google Scholar
Milinski, M. (2019). Gossip and reputation in social dilemmas. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 193–213). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.11.Google Scholar
Mitra, T., & Gilbert, E. (2012). Have you heard? How gossip flows through workplace email. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 6(1), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v6i1.14260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, W. W., & Schweidel, D. A. (2012). Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Science, 31(3), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrazek, A. J., Chiao, J. Y., Blizinsky, K. D., Lun, J., & Gelfand, M. J. (2013). The role of culture–gene coevolution in morality judgment: Examining the interplay between tightness–looseness and allelic variation of the serotonin transporter gene. Culture and Brain, 1(2–4), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-013-0009-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Na, J., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. J. (2015). When a new tool is introduced in different cultural contexts: Individualism–collectivism and social network on Facebook. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114563932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Németh, A., & Takács, K. (2010). The paradox of cooperation benefits. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 264(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.02.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesse, R. M. (2013). Tinbergen’s four questions, organized: A response to Bateson and Laland. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(12), 681–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.10.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesse, R. M. (2019). Good Reasons for Bad Feelings: Insights from the Frontier of Evolutionary Psychiatry. Penguin.Google Scholar
Nieper, A. S., Beersma, B., Dijkstra, M. T., & van Kleef, G. A. (2022). When and why does gossip increase prosocial behavior? Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.10.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noë, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1995). Biological markets. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10(8), 336–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89123-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393(6685), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/31225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437(7063), 1291–1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, M., & Highfield, R. (2011). Supercooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Paine, R. (1968). Gossip and transaction. Man, 3(2), 305–308. www.jstor.org/stable/2798510.Google Scholar
Panchanathan, K., & Boyd, R. (2004). Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem. Nature, 432(7016), 499–502. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piazza, J., & Bering, J. M. (2008). Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piazza, J., Bering, J. M., & Ingram, G. (2011). “Princess Alice is watching you”: Children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526. https://doi:10.1017/S0140525X00076512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przepiorka, W., Norbutas, L., & Corten, R. (2017). Order without law: Reputation promotes cooperation in a cryptomarket for illegal drugs. European Sociological Review, 33(6), 752–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puranam, P. (2018). The Microstructure of Organizations. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raub, W., & Weesie, J. (1990). Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 626–654. https://doi.org/10.1086/229574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, M., Rohlfing, K., & Goecke, K. U. (2003). Situatedness: The Interplay between context(s) and situation. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(2), 132–156. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853703322148516.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. (1998). Competitive altruism: From reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265(1394), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, G., Raihani, N., Bshary, R., et al. (2021). The benefits of being seen to help others: Indirect reciprocity and reputation-based partner choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), 20200290. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, F. P., Pacheco, J. M., & Santos, F. C. (2021). The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), 20200291. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, J. C. (2008a). Domination and the Arts of Resistance. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (2008b). Weapons of the Weak. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. C., Dickins, T. E., & West, S. A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and the ultimate–proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, A., Montinari, N., Piovesan, M., et al. (2014). Children develop a veil of fairness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shenk, D. (1997). Data Smog. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Snijders, C., & Matzat, U. (2019). Online reputation systems. In Giardini, F. & Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (pp. 479–496). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.25.Google Scholar
Soeters, J., & van Iterson, A. (2002). Blame and praise gossip in organizations: Established, outsiders and the civilising process. Advances in Organization Studies, 10, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H. J., & Milinski, M. (2008). Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 275, 2529–2536. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0762.Google ScholarPubMed
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H. J., Semmann, D., & Milinski, M. (2007). Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(44), 17435–17440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704598104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steg, L., Lindenberg, S., & Keizer, K. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, norms and environmental behavior: The dynamics of overarching goals. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(1–2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiff, C. (2019). The Dark Triad and Facebook surveillance: How Machiavellianism, psychopathy, but not narcissism predict using Facebook to spy on others. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, R. B. (1956). Some psychological mechanisms operative in gossip. Social Forces, 34(3), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2574050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suls, J. M. (1977). Gossip as social comparison. Journal of Communication, 27(1), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01812.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, C. H., Korzan, W. J., Lukkes, J. L., et al. (2005). Does Serotonin influence aggression? Comparing regional activity before and during social interaction. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 78(5), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1086/432139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tadelis, S. (2016). Reputation and feedback systems in online platform markets. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takács, K., Gross, J., Testori, M., et al. (2021). Networks of reliable reputations and cooperation: A review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), 20200297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, N., Yam, K. C., Zhang, P., & Brown, D. J. (2021). Are you gossiping about me? The costs and benefits of high workplace gossip prevalence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(3), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09683-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennie, C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Reputation management in the age of the world-wide web. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(11), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Testori, M., Hemelrijk, C. K., & Beersma, B. (2022). Gossip promotes cooperation only when it is pro-socially motivated. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08670-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E., & Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: The interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 53(6), 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaidyanathan, B., Khalsa, S., & Ecklund, E. H. (2016). Gossip as social control: Informal sanctions on ethical violations in scientific workplaces. Social Problems, 63(4), 554–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spw022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions Royal Society B, 368, 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Iterson, A., & Clegg, S. R. (2008). The politics of gossip and denial in interorganizational relations. Human Relations, 61(8), 1117–1137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villatoro, D., Giardini, F., & Conte, R. (2011). Reputation spreading as sanctioning mechanism for social norm establishment. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Reputation, 1–11. https://tinyurl.com/36c4y5f9.Google Scholar
Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2001). Weak ties as a liability: The case of East Germany. Rationality and Society, 13(4), 397–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346301013004001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, K., & Fletcher, C. (2005). Gossip and emotion in nursing and health-care organizations. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 19(4/5), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260510615404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, S. C., & Danzi, A. D. (1995). Women’s gossip and social change: Childbirth and fertility control among Italian and Jewish women in the United States, 1920–1940. Gender & Society, 9(4), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009004005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg‐Wolf, H., & Chang, S. W. C. (2019). Differences in how macaques monitor others: Does serotonin play a central role? WIREs Cognitive Science, 10(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, R. M., & Asch, D. A. (2005). The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. JAMA, 293(10), 1239–1244. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.10.1239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wert, S. R., & Salovey, P. (2004). A social comparison account of gossip. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, C. (1998). Gossip and resistance among the medieval peasantry. Past & Present, 160, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/160.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1992). Complex interactions in metacommunities, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. Ecology, 73(6), 1984–2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1998). Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353(1366), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2008). Evolution “for the Good of the Group.” American Scientist, 96(5), 380–389. www.jstor.org/stable/27859205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Near, D. C., & Miller, R. R. (1998). Individual differences in Machiavellianism as a mix of cooperative and exploitative strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00011-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, D. S., O’Brien, D. T., & Sesma, A. (2009). Human prosociality from an evolutionary perspective: Variation and correlations at a city-wide scale. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(3), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Van Vugt, M., & O’Gorman, R. (2008). Multilevel selection theory and major evolutionary transitions: Implications for psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00538.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Wilczynski, C., Wells, A., & Weiser, L. (2000). Gossip and other aspects of language as group-level adaptations. In Huber, L. & Heyes, C. M. (Eds.), The Evolution of Cognition (347–366). MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, H. L. (1910). Latin Inscriptions at the Johns Hopkins University. IV. The American Journal of Philology, 31(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/288847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittek, R. (2013). Norm violations and informal control in organizations: A relational signaling perspective. In Nooteboom, B. & Six, F. (Eds.), The Trust Process in Organizations: Empirical Studies of the Determinants and the Process of Trust Development (pp. 168–195). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843767350.00015.Google Scholar
Wittek, R., & Wielers, R. (1998). Gossip in organizations. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 4(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009636325582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittek, R., Snijders, T., & Nee, V. (2013). Introduction: Rational choice social research. In Wittek, R., Snijders, T. A. B., & Nee, V. (Eds), The Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research (pp. 1–32). Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2016). Reputation, gossip, and human cooperation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(6), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoeli, E., Hoffman, M., Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 10424–10429. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.130121011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Evolution of Reputation-Based Cooperation
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Evolution of Reputation-Based Cooperation
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Evolution of Reputation-Based Cooperation
Available formats
×