Element contents
Series: Elements in Beckett Studies
Insufferable: Beckett, Gender and Sexuality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 September 2023
Summary
Insufferable: Beckett, Gender and Sexuality rethinks the role of gender politics in the oeuvre, demonstrates Beckett's historical importance in the development of the 'antisocial thesis' in queer theory, and shows the work's attachment to sexuality as temporarily consolatory but ultimately unbearable. The Beckett oeuvre might seem unpromising material for gender and sexuality studies, but this is exactly what makes it worth considering. This Element brings to Beckett questions that have emerged from gender, queer, and trans theory, engages with the history of feminism and sexuality studies, and develops a theoretical framework able to account for what we have previously overlooked, underplayed, and misinterpreted in Beckett. In the spirit of being 'on the lookout for an elsewhere', it makes a case for a queerly generative de-idealisation of Beckett as an object of critical study.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Beckett StudiesOnline ISBN: 9781009244763Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 19 October 2023
References
Ahmed, Sara (2010), ‘Killing Joy: Feminism and the History of Happiness’, Signs, 35:3, pp. 571–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, Daniel (2003), Beckett and Aesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis (1964), ‘Marxism and Humanism’, Cahiers de l’I.S.E.A., June. www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/index.htm.Google Scholar
Amin, Kadji (2016), ‘Against Queer Objects’, Feminist Formations, 28:2, pp. 101–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Anthony (2007), Listening for Henry Crowder: A Monograph on His almost Lost Music, with the Poems and Music of Henry Music, Lewes: AB Faber and Allardyce Books.Google Scholar
Baroghel, Elsa (2017), ‘Samuel Beckett, lecteur de Sade: Comment C’est et Les 120 Journées de Sodome’, in Brown, Llewellyn (ed.), La violence dans l’œuvre de Samuel Beckett: entre langage et corps, ‘Samuel Beckett’, vol. 4, Paris: Lettres Modernes Minard/Classiques Garnier, pp. 227–59.Google Scholar
Baroghel, Elsa (2018), ‘Beckett, with Sade: Sadean Intertexts and Aesthetics in Samuel Beckett’s Work’, unpublished doctoral thesis, New College, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Baroghel, Elsa (2022), ‘How It Was in Silling: Comment c’est and Les 120 journées de Sodome: An Intertextual Case Study’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 31:1, pp. 80–94.Google Scholar
Barolini, Teodolinda (2014–20), The Divine Comedy by Dante Alighieri, Digital Dante edition with Commento Baroliniano (Columbia University). https://digitaldante.columbia.edu/dante/divine-comedy/paradiso/paradiso-9.Google Scholar
Barry, Elizabeth, Maude, Ulrika and Salisbury, Laura (2016), ‘Introduction: Beckett, Medicine and the Brain’, Journal of Medical Humanities, 37:2, pp. 127–35.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel, Whoroscope Notebook, UoR MS3000, Beckett International Foundation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel, Correspondence with Pamela Mitchell, UoR MS5060, Beckett International Foundation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1931), ‘Yoke of Liberty’, in Putnam, Samuel (ed.), The European Caravan: A Critical Anthology of the New Spirit in European Literature, New York: Brewer, Warren and Putnam, p. 480.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1960), Original Manuscript of Play Female Solo, UoR MS1227, Beckett International Foundation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1975), No’s Knife: Collected Shorter Prose 1945–1966, London: Calder & Boyars.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1979), Heard in the Dark 2, ed. Pilling, John, Journal of Beckett Studies, 5, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1992), Quad et autres pieces pour la télevision, suivi de L’épuisé par Gilles Deleuze, Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1995), The Complete Short Prose, 1929–1989, ed. Gontarski, S. E., New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1998), No Author Better Served: The Correspondence of Samuel Beckett and Alan Schneider, ed. Harmon, Maurice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2003), ‘Annotations of Dream of Fair to Middling Women, ed. John Pilling’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 12:1 and 2.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2009a), Company, Ill Seen Ill Said, Worstward Ho, Stirrings Still, ed. Hulle, Dirk Van, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2009b), How It Is, ed. O’Reilly, Éduard Magessa, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2009c), The Letters of Samuel Beckett, Vol. I: 1929–1940, ed. Fehsenfeld, Martha Dow and Overbeck, Lois More, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2010b), Texts for Nothing and Other Shorter Prose 1950–1976, ed. Nixon, Mark, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2011), The Letters of Samuel Beckett, Vol. II: 1941–1956, ed. Craig, George, Fehsenfeld, Martha Dow, Gunn, Dan and Overbeck, Lois More, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2012), Collected Poems, ed. Lawlor, Seán and Pilling, John, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2014), The Letters of Samuel Beckett, Vol. III: 1957–1965, ed. Craig, George, Fehsenfeld, Martha Dow, Gunn, Dan and Overbeck, Lois More, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2016), The Letters of Samuel Beckett, Vol. IV: 1966–1989, ed. Craig, George, Fehsenfeld, Martha Dow, Gunn, Dan and Overbeck, Lois More, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2024), Company / Compagnie: a digital genetic edition (Series ‘The Beckett Digital Manuscript Project’, module 9), edited by Georgina Nugent and Vincent Neyt, Brussels: University Press Antwerp (ASP/UPA), www.beckettarchive.org.Google Scholar
Ben-Zvi, Linda (1990), Women in Beckett: Performance and Critical Perspectives, Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren (1997), The Queen of American Goes to Washington City, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren (2008), The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren and Edelman, Lee (2014), Sex, Or the Unbearable, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersani, Leo (1986), The Freudian Body: Psychoanalysis and Art, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo (1987), ‘Is the Rectum a Grave?’, October AIDS: Cultural Analysis/Cultural Activism, 43, pp. 197–222.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo and Dutoit, Ulysse (1993), Arts of Impoverishment: Beckett, Rothko, Resnais, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Billington, Michael (2016), ‘No’s Knife Review. Lisa Dwan Excels in Beckett’s Strange No Man’s Land’, The Guardian, 4 October.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice (2003), The Book to Come, trans. Charlotte Mandell, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice (2004), Lautremont and Sade, trans. Stuart Kendall and Michelle Kendall, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bond Stockton, Kathryn (2009), The Queer Child, or Growing Sideways in the Twentieth Century, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Boxall, Peter (2004), ‘Beckett and Homoeroticism’, in Oppenheim, Lois (ed.), Palgrave Advances in Samuel Beckett Studies, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 110–32.Google Scholar
Brater, Enoch (1994), The Drama in the Text: Beckett’s Late Fiction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brim, Matt (2020), Poor Queer Studies: Confronting Elitism in the University, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Llewellyn (2018), “Textes pour rien”/“Texts for Nothing” de Samuel Beckett. Le corps de la voix impossible, Série Samuel Beckett, 6, Paris: Classiques Garnier, Lettres modernes Minard.Google Scholar
Bryden, Mary (1993), Women in Samuel Beckett’s Prose and Drama: Her Own Other, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1993), Bodies That Matter. On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1997), Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buse, Peter and Lapsley, Rob (2023), ‘Gaps in Transmission: Reading Lacan’s Télévision’, Modern Philology, 120:3, pp. 394–415.Google Scholar
Carville, Conor (2018), Samuel Beckett and the Visual Arts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caselli, Daniela (2005a), Beckett’s Dantes: Intertextuality in the Fiction and Criticism, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Caselli, Daniela (2005b), ‘The Child in Beckett’ and ‘Tiny Little Things in Beckett’s Company’, Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 15, pp. 259–60 and pp. 271–80.Google Scholar
Caselli, Daniela, ed. (2010), Beckett and Nothing: Trying to Understand Beckett, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Caselli, Daniela (2012), ‘Beckett and Leopardi’, in Gontarski, S. E. (ed.), The Beckett Critical Reader, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 135–51.Google Scholar
Caselli, Daniela (2020), ‘Address’, The Beckett Circle, https://samuelbeckettsociety.org/beckettcircle.Google Scholar
Caselli, Daniela, Connor, Steven and Salisbury, Laura, eds (2001/2), Other Becketts, special double issue Journal of Beckett Studies, 10:1–2.Google Scholar
Chattopadhay, Arka (2018), Beckett, Lacan, and the Mathematical Writing of the Real, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Clark, Suzanne (1991), Sentimental Modernism: Women Writers and the Revolution of the World, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Crowder, Henry with Speck, Hugo (1987), As Wonderful As All That? Henry Crowder’s Memoir of His Affair with Nancy Cunard 1928–1935, with an introduction and epilogue by Robert L. Allen, Navarro, CA: Wild Trees Press.Google Scholar
Cunard, Nancy (1937), ‘Authors Take Sides on the Spanish Civil War’, Left Review, https://tinyurl.com/4zfypr44.Google Scholar
Cunningham, David (2005), ‘Asceticism Against Colour, or Modernism, Abstraction and the Lateness of Beckett’, New Formations, 55, pp. 104–19.Google Scholar
Cunningham, David (2008), ‘“We Have Our Being in Justice”: Formalism, Abstraction and Beckett’s “Ethics”’, in Smith, Russell (ed.), Beckett and Ethics, London: Continuum, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
Davis, William and Bailey, Helen, eds (2020), Beckett and Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (1975), Kafka: pour une littérature mineure, Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix (1983), ‘What Is a Minor Literature?’, Mississippi Review, 11:3, pp. 13–33.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1992), “‘This Strange Institution Called Literature’: An Interview with Jacques Derrida’, trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby, in Acts of Literature, ed. Attridge, Derek, New York: Routledge, pp. 60–1.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone (1953), Must we Burn Sade?, trans. Annette Michelson, bibliography and chronology compiled by Paul Dinnage, London: Peter Neville.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone ([1949] 2010), The Second Sex, trans. Constance Borde and Sheila Malovaney-Chevallier, London: Vintage.Google Scholar
de Berg, Jean ([1956] 1966), The Image, trans. Patsy Southgate, preface by Pauline Réage, New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Dinshaw, Carolyn (2012), How Soon Is Now? Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers and the Queerness of Time, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Dolar, Mladen (2010), ‘Nothing Has Changed’, in Caselli, Daniela (ed.), Beckett and Nothing, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 48–64.Google Scholar
DuBois, W. E. B. ([1903] 2018), The Souls of Black Folk: Essays and Sketches, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Duggan, Lisa (2002), ‘The New Homonormativity: The Sexual Politics of Neoliberalism’, in Castronovo, Russ and Nelson, Dana D. (eds), Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 175–94.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lee (2004), No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Eng, David L. with Judith Halberstam and Esteban Muñoz, José (2005), ‘Introduction’, What’s Queer about Queer Studies Now? Social Text special issue, 23:3–4, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Feldman, Matthew (2006), Beckett’s Books: A Cultural History of Samuel Beckett’s ‘Interwar Notes’, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Fifield, Peter (2014), ‘“I Am Writing a Manifesto Because I Have Nothing to Say,” Samuel Beckett and the Interwar Avant-Garde’, in Gontarski, S. E. (ed.), The Edinburgh Companion to Samuel Beckett and the Arts, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 170–84.Google Scholar
Fox, Pamela (1994), Class Fictions: Shame and Resistance in the British Working-Class Novel, 1890–1945, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Graham (1995), ‘The Pornographic Imagination in All Strange Away’, Modern Fiction Studies, 41:3–4, pp. 515–30.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund ([1920] 2001), ‘Beyond the Pleasure Principle’ (1920), in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works, trans. and general ed. James Strachey in collaboration with Anna Freud, assisted by Alix Strachey and Alan Tyson, vol. XVIII 1920–2, London: Vintage, pp. 7–64.Google Scholar
Friedman, Alan Warren (2000), Beckett in Black and Red: The Translations of Nancy Cunard’s “Negro” (1934), Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Friedman, Alan Warren (2018), Surreal Beckett: Samuel Beckett, James Joyce and Surrealism, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedman, Melvin J. (1960), ‘Samuel Beckett and the “Nouveau Roman”’, Wisconsin Studies in Contemporary Literature, 1:2, pp. 22–36.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Kay (2020), ‘Gender As Accumulation Strategy’, Invert, 1, invertjournal.org.uk.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S. E. (1995), ‘Introduction’, in Samuel Beckett: The Complete Short Prose, 1929–1989, ed. Gontarski, S. E., New York, Grove Press, pp. xi–xxxii.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S. E. (2006), ‘Greying the Canon: Beckett in Performance, Beckett Performing’, in Gontarski, S. E. and Uhlmann, Anthony (eds), Beckett after Beckett, Gainsville: University Press of Florida, pp. 141–57. Reprinted in S. E. Gontarski (2017), Beckett Matters, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 240–54.Google Scholar
Gopal, Priyamvada (2019), Insurgent Empire: Anticolonial Resistance and British Dissent, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Green, Eleanor (2022), ‘Queer Sexuality in Samuel Beckett’s Late Prose’, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Gussow, Mel (1997), ‘When Beckett Decided He’d Fix the Record’, New York Times, 4 January.Google Scholar
Jagose, Annamarie (2015), ‘The Trouble with Antinormativity’, differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 26:1, pp. 26–47.Google Scholar
Joyce, James ([1922] 2008), Ulysses. The 1922 Text, introduction by Jeri Johnson, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Donald E. and Jagose, Annamarie with Bebell, Andrea and Susan Potter, eds (2013), The Routledge Queer Studies Reader, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansford, James (1983), ‘Skullscapes: Imaginative Strategies in the Later Prose of Samuel Beckett’, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Hartman, Saidiya V. (1997), Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartman, Saidiya V. (2007), Lose Your Mother: A Journey along the Atlantic Slave Route, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hartman, Saidiya V. and Wilderson, Frank B. III (2003), ‘The Position of the Unthought: An Interview with Saidiya V. Hartman conducted by Frank B. Wilderson III”, Qui parle, 13:2, pp. 183–201.Google Scholar
Keeling, Kara (2019), Black Times, Queer Futures, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, John Robert (2002), Samuel Beckett and the Primacy of Love, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Seán (2020), Beckett beyond the Normal, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Klossowski, Pierre (1991), Sade My Neighbour, trans. with an introduction by Alphonso Lingis, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James (1996), Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Krimper, Michael, ed. (2022), Journal of Beckett Studies, Dossier: Beckett’s Translations of Sade for Transition, 31:1.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques (2015), ‘Freud Forever: An Interview with Panorama’, trans. Philip Dravers, Hurly-Burly: The International Lacanian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 12, pp. 13–22.Google Scholar
Laplanche, Jean (1976), Life and Death in Psychoanalysis, trans. with an introduction by Jeffrey Mehlman, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lesnik-Oberstein, Karín (2017), ‘The Object of Neuroscience and Literary Studies’, Textual Practice, 31:7, pp. 1315–31.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert ([1964] 2007), One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marder, Elissa (2016), ‘Inhuman Beauty: Baudelaire’s Bad Sex’, differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 27:1, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Maude, Ulrika and Feldman, Matthew, eds (2009), Beckett and Phenomenology, London: Bloomsbury Continuum.Google Scholar
McKeon, Belinda (2016), ‘Lisa Dwan: Beckett Made These Wounds Universal’, The Guardian, 17 September.Google Scholar
McMullan, Anna (1993), Theatre on Trial: Samuel Beckett’s Later Drama, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McMullan, Anna (2010), Performing Embodiment in Samuel Beckett’s Drama, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McNaughton, James (2018), Beckett and the Politics of the Aftermath, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McTighe, Trish (2019), ‘Everyday Catastrophe: Gender, Labour and Power in Beckett’s Theatre’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 28:1, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar
Miller, Monica L. (2009), Slaves to Fashion: Black Dandyism and the Styling of Black Diasporic Identity, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Pamela (c.1953–70), ‘Correspondence with Samuel Beckett’, UoR MS5060, Beckett International Foundation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Morin, Emily (2017), Beckett’s Political Imagination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni (1992), Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination, Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nayak, Suryia (2014), Race, Gender and the Activism of Black Feminist Theory: Working with Audre Lorde, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich ([1886] 1973), Beyond Good and Evil, trans. R. J. Hollingdale, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nixon, Mark (2010), ‘Preface‘, in Beckett, Samuel: Texts for Nothing and other Shorter Prose, 1950–1976, ed. Nixon, Mark, London: Faber and Faber, pp. vii–xxiv.Google Scholar
Periyan, Natasha (2018), The Politics of 1930s British Literature: Education, Gender and Class, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Piette, Adam (2011), ‘Beckett, Affect and the Face’, Textual Practice, 25:2, pp. 281–95.Google Scholar
Pilling, John (2012), ‘No Lack of Void: Review of The Letters of Samuel Beckett 1941–1956’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 21:1, pp. 106–21.Google Scholar
Pilling, John (2014), ‘Beckett/Sade: Texts for Nothing’, in Gontarski, S. E. (ed.), The Edinburgh Companion to Samuel Beckett and the Arts, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 117–30.Google Scholar
Praz, Mario [1930] (2008), La carne, la morte e il diavolo nella letteratura romantica. Milan: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Preciado, Paul B. (2018), Countersexual Manifesto, trans. Kevin Jerry Dunn with a preface by Jack Halberstam, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Radway, Janice (1984), Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Ravez, Stéphanie (2001), ‘From Cithera to Philautia: An Excursion into Beckettian Love’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 10:1–2, pp. 136–51.Google Scholar
Roof, Judith (2002), ‘Is There Sex after Gender? Ungendering/The Unnamable’, Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 35:1, pp. 50–67.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle ([1975 and 1984] 2012), ‘The Traffic in Women: Notes on the Political Economy of Sex’ and ‘Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality’, in Deviations: A Gayle Rubin Reader, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 33–65 and 137–81.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Laura (2010), ‘“Something or Nothing”: Beckett and the Matter of Language’, in Caselli, Daniela (ed.), Beckett and Nothing: Trying to Understand Beckett, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 213–36.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Laura (2011), ‘Bulimic Beckett: Food for Thought and the Archive of Analysis’, Critical Quarterly, 3:53, pp. 60–80.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Laura (2012), Samuel Beckett: Laughing Matters, Comic Timing, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Laura (2016), ‘Jackson’s Parrot: Samuel Beckett, Aphasic Speech Automatisms, and Psychosomatic Language’, Journal of Medical Humanities, 37, pp. 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Laura (2017), ‘“I Switch Off”: Beckett, Bion, and Thinking in Torturous Times’, Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 29:2, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Laura (2023), ‘Slow Violence and Slow Going: Encountering Beckett in a Time of Climate Catastrophe’, in Tsushima, Michiko, Tajiri, Yoshiki and Tanaka, Mariko Hori (eds), Samuel Beckett and Catastrophe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Laura and Shail, Andrew, eds (2010), Neurology and Modernity: A Cultural History of Nervous Systems 1800–1950, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul (1960), Critique de la raison dialectique, vol. I, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky (1990), Epistemology of the Closet, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, ed. (1997), Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Christina (2016), In the Wake: On Blackness and Being, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Paul (2006), ‘Births for Nothing: Beckett’s Ontology of Parturition’, in Uhlmann, Anthony and Gontarski, S. E. (eds), Beckett after Beckett, Tallahassee: University of Florida Press, pp. 177–86.Google Scholar
Sherry, Vincent (2014), Modernism and the Reinvention of Decadence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Hannah (2020), ‘“He Wants to Know if It Hurts!” Suffering beyond Redemption in Waiting for Godot’, in Kennedy, Seán (ed.), Beckett beyond the Normal, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
Simpson, Hannah (2022a), ‘“In Control … under Control”: Not I, Sexual Trauma, and Rape Play’, Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 34:1, pp. 24–38.Google Scholar
Simpson, Hannah (2022b), Samuel Beckett and Disability Performance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smith, Molly and Mac, Juno (2018), Revolting Prostitutes: The Fight for Sex Workers’ Rights, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan (1967), ‘The Pornographic Imagination’, Partisan Review, 34:2, pp. 181–212.Google Scholar
Spillers, Hortense J. (1987), ‘Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar’, Diacritics, 17:2, pp. 64–81.Google Scholar
Stacey, Jackie (2015), ‘Crossing over with Tilda Swinton: The Mistress of “Flat Affect”’, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 28:3, pp. 243–71.Google Scholar
Stacey, Jackie (2019), ‘Butch Noir’, differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 30:2, pp. 30–71.Google Scholar
Stewart, Paul (2011), Sex and Aesthetics in Samuel Beckett’s Work, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Thomas, Calvin (2019), ‘Beckett’s Queer Art of Failure’, in Rabaté, Jean-Michel (ed.), The New Samuel Beckett Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–74.Google Scholar
Thomson, Stephen (2010), ‘“A Tangle of Tatters”: Ghosts and the Busy Nothing in Footfalls’, in Caselli, Daniela (ed.), Beckett and Nothing: Trying to Understand Beckett, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 65–83.Google Scholar
Tranter, Rhys (2013), ‘The Dan Gunn Interview’, Quarterly Conversation, 4 March, https://quarterlyconversation.com.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, Anthony (2006), Beckett and the Philosophical Image, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Hulle, Dirk and Nixon, Mark (2013), Samuel Beckett’s Library, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, Glyn (2011), “What’s So Secret about Samuel Beckett’, Huffington Post, 1 November.Google Scholar
Walker, Dominic (2020), ‘Beckett’s Safe Words: Normalising Torture in How It Is’, in Kennedy, Seán (ed.), Beckett beyond the Normal, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 117–32.Google Scholar
Walton, Jean (2010), ‘Modernity and the Peristaltic Subject’, in Salisbury, Laura and Shail, Andrew (eds), Neurology and Modernity: A Cultural History of Nervous Systems, 1800–1950, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 245–66.Google Scholar
Weiss, Katherine (2021), ‘“Of her tenacious trace”: Samuel Beckett and Contemporary Art’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 30:2, pp. 174–87.Google Scholar
Weller, Shane (2006), ‘When the Other Comes Too Close: Derrida and the Threat of Affinity’, Kritikos 3.Google Scholar
Weller, Shane (2008), ‘The Anethics of Desire: Beckett, Racine, Sade’, in Smith, Russell (ed.), Beckett and Ethics, London: Continuum, pp. 102–17.Google Scholar
West, Cornel (2020), Interview with Anderson Cooper, www.youtube.com/watch?v=90G_QdxqqJs, mins 5.50 to 6.15.Google Scholar
West, Paul (1983/4), ‘Deciphering a Beckett Fiction on His Birthday’, Parnassus: Poetry in Review, 11:2, pp. 319–22.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn and Wilson, Elizabeth (2015), ‘Introduction: Antinormativity’s Queer Conventions’, differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 26:1, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn (2017), ‘Sex and Negativity; or, What Queer Theory Has for You’, Cultural Critique, 95, pp. 219–43.Google Scholar
Wimbush, Andy (2018), ‘“Omniscience and Omnipotence”: Molloy and the End of “Joyceology”’, in Beloborodova, Olga, Hulle, Dirk Van and Verhulst, Pim (eds), Beckett and Modernism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
Winnicott, Donald (1949), ‘Hate in the Counter-Transference’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 30, pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
Winstanley, A. M. (2013), ‘“First Dirty, Then Make Clean”: Samuel Beckett’s Peristaltic Modernism, 1932–1958’, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Wolff, Janet (2008), The Aesthetics of Uncertainty, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Woodworth, Robert S. ([1931] 1965), Contemporary Schools of Psychology, London: Methuen and Company.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by