Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:04:01.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant

Kant and Global Distributive Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2020

Sylvie Loriaux
Sylvie Loriaux
Affiliation:
Laval University

Summary

This Element argues that although Kant's political thought does not tackle issues of global poverty and inequality head on, it nonetheless offers important conceptual and normative resources to think of our global socioeconomic duties. It delves into the Kantian duty to enter a rightful condition beyond the state and shows that a proper understanding of this duty not only leads us to acknowledge a duty of right to assist states that are unable to fulfil the core functions of a state, but also provides valuable hints at what just transnational trade relations and a just regulation of immigration should look like.
Get access

Keywords

Immanuel Kantbeneficenceequality of opportunityrightful conditionglobal poverty and inequality
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant
Online ISBN: 9781108678834
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 03 December 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arneson, Richard (1989) ‘Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare’. Philosophical Studies, 56, 77–93.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (1982) ‘Humanity and Justice in Global Perspective’. Nomos. Ethics, Economics, and the Law, 24, 219–52.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (1989) Democracy, Power and Justice: Essays in Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Michael (2001) ‘Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30, 257–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen (1987) ‘Justice and Charity’. Ethics, 97, 558–75.Google Scholar
Byrd, Sharon and Hruschka, Joachim (2010) Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byrd, Sharon (1995) ‘The State as a ‘Moral Person’. In Robinson, Hoke (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press), pp. 171–89.Google Scholar
Campbell, Tom D. (1974) ‘Humanity before Justice’. British Journal of Political Sciences, 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph H. (1987) ‘Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders’. The Review of Politics, 49, 251–73.Google Scholar
Chauvier, Stéphane (1996) Du droit d’être étranger. Essai sur le concept kantien d’un droit cosmopolitique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald A. (1989) ‘On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice’. Ethics, 99, 906–44.Google Scholar
Collingwood, Vivien (2003) ‘Assistance with Fewer Strings Attached’. Ethics & International Affairs, 17, 55–67.Google Scholar
Dietsch, Peter (2015) Catching Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dübgen, Franziska (2012) ‘Africa Humiliated? Misrecognition in Development Aid’. Res Publica, 18, 65–77.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (2002) Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin (2000) Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (2010) ‘Injustice at Intersecting Scales: On ‘Social Exclusion’ and the ‘Global Poor’. European Journal of Social Theory, 13, 363–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel (2007) Justice and the Social Contract. Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000) Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Rafeeq (2018a) ‘Freedom and Poverty in the Kantian State’. European Journal of Philosophy, 26, 911–31.Google Scholar
Hasan, Rafeeq (2018b) ‘The Provisionality of Property Rights in Kant’s Doctrine of Right’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 48, 850–76.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara (1984) ‘Mutual Aid and Respect for Persons’. Ethics, 94, 577–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. (2002) Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Holtman, Sarah (2004) ‘Kantian Justice and Poverty Relief’. Kant-Studien, 95, 86–106.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Transl. and ed. by Mary J. Gregor, intr. By Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Alexander (1999) Welfare in the Kantian State. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2012) Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996) Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (2018) ‘The Claims of Animals and the Needs of Strangers: Two Cases of Imperfect Right’. Journal of Practical Ethics, 6, 19–51.Google Scholar
Laberge, Pierre (1998) ‘Kant on Justice and the Law of Nations’. In Mapel, David and Nardin, Terry (eds.), International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 82–102.Google Scholar
Mason, Andrew (2001) ‘Equality of Opportunity, Old and New’. Ethics, 111, 760–81.Google Scholar
Miller, David (2012) ‘Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification’. Political Studies, 60, 252–68.Google Scholar
Moellendorf, Darrel (2009) Global Inequality Matters. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sankar (2012) ‘Conquest, Commerce, and Cosmopolitanism in Enlightenment Political Thought’. In Muthu, Sankar (ed.), Empire and Modern Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 199–231.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sankar (2014) ‘Productive Resistance in Kant’s Political Thought’. In Flikschuh, Katrin and Ypi, Lea (eds.), Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 68–98.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (2005) ‘The Problem of Global Justice’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33, 113–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1989) ‘Universal Laws and Ends-in-themselves’. The Monist, 72, 3, 341–61.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (2000) Bounds of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (2015) Constructing Authorities. Reason, Politics and Interpretation in Kant’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevnick, Ryan (2008) ‘Political Coercion and the Scope of Distributive Justice’. Political Studies, 56, 399–413.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel ([1672] 1729) Of the Law of Nature and Nations. Trans. by Basil Kennett, notes by J. Barbeyrac. London: printed for J. Walthoe, R. Wilkin, J. and J. Bonwicke, S. Birt, T. Ward, and T. Osborne.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2001) Justice as fairness: a Restatement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reidy, David (2007) ‘A Just Global Economy: in Defense of Rawls’. The Journal of Ethics, 11, 193–236.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999) The Law of Peoples. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur (2009) Force and Freedom. Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass. – London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roemer, John E. (1998) Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronzoni, Miriam (2016) ‘Global Labour Injustice: a Critical Overview’. In Dahan, Yossi, Lerner, Hanna and Milman-Sivan, Faina (eds.), Global Justice and International Labour Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 27–52.Google Scholar
Rosen, Allen D. (1993) Kant’s Theory of Justice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrea (2007) ‘Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35, 319–44.Google Scholar
Simmons, John (2001) ‘On the Territorial Rights of States’. Noûs, 35, 300–26.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter (1972) ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1, 229–43.Google Scholar
Stilz, Annie (2009) ‘Why Do States Have Territorial Rights’. International Theory, 1, 185–213.Google Scholar
Taylor, Marcus and Rioux, Sébastien (2017) Global Labour Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Tesón, Fernando (2012) ‘Why Free Trade is Required by Justice?’. Social Philosophy & Policy, 29, 126–53.Google Scholar
Varden, Helga (2006) ‘Kant and Dependency Relations: Kant on the State’s Right to Redistribute Resources to Protect the Rights of Dependents’. Dialogue, 45, 257–84.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Jacob (2008) ‘Kant on Citizenship and Universal Independence’. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 33, 1–25.Google Scholar
Williams, Howard (2010) ‘Toward a Kantian Theory of International Distributive Justice’. Kantian Review, 15, 43–77.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (2008) Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank (2005) World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development, available at www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/09/20/000112742_20050920110826/Rendered/PDF/322040World0Development0Report02006.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ypi, Lea (2014) ‘A Permissive Theory of Territorial Rights’. European Journal of Philosophy, 22, 288–312.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Kant and Global Distributive Justice
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Kant and Global Distributive Justice
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Kant and Global Distributive Justice
Available formats
×