Element contents
Lucrezia Marinella
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 March 2024
Summary
Lucrezia Marinella's (1571–1653) most important contributions to philosophy were two polemical treatises: The Nobility and excellence of Women, and the Defects and Vices of Men, and the Exhortations to Women and to Others if They Please. Marinella argues for the superiority of women over men in every respect: psychologically, physiologically, morally, and intellectually. She is particularly effective in using the resources of ancient philosophy to support her various arguments, in which she draws conclusions about the souls and the bodies of women, the nature and significance of women's beauty, the virtue of women and the liberty to which women as well as men are entitled. This Element showcases that her claim of superiority is intended ultimately to justify the possibility of political rule by women.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009029162Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 18 April 2024
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Marinella, Lucrezia. De’ gesti eroici e della vita meravigliosa della Serafica S. Caterina da Siena, ed. Maggi, A.. Ravenna: Longo, [1624] 2011.Google Scholar
Marinella, Lucrezia. Enrico; or, Byzantium Conquered: A Heroic Poem, ed. and trans. Stampino, M. Galli. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinella, Lucrezia. L’Enrico, ovvero Bisanzio acquistato, poema eroico, ed. Stampino, M. Galli. Modena: Mucchi, [1635] 2010.Google Scholar
Marinella, Lucrezia. Exhortations to Women and to Others if They Please, ed. and trans. Benedetti, Laura. Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, 2012.Google Scholar
Marinella, Lucrezia. La nobiltà et l’eccellenza delle donne co’ diffetti et mancamenti de gli uomini. Venice: Giolito, 1601.Google Scholar
Marinella, Lucrezia. The Nobility and Excellence of Women, and the Defects and Vices of Men, ed. and trans. Anne Dunhill. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secondary Sources
Agrippa, Henricus Cornelius. De nobilitate & praecellentia foeminei sexus. Antwerp: apud Michaelem Hillenium in Rapo, 1529.Google Scholar
Agrippa, Henricus Cornelius. Declamation on the Nobility and Preeminence of the Female Sex, ed. and trans. Rabil, A. Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrippa, Henricus Cornelius. Della nobiltà e Eccellenza delle Donne, dalla lingua francese nella italiana tradotto con una Oratione di M. Allessandro Piccolomini in lode delle medesime, trans. Coccio. Venice: Gabriel Giolito de Ferrari, 1549.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Generation of Animals, trans. A. L. Peck. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics, trans. C. J. Rowe and S. Broadie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Parts of Animals, trans. J. G. Lennox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Aristotle. The Complete Works, ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Bronzino, Cristoforo. Della dignità e nobiltà delle donne: Dialogo di Cristofano Bronzini [sic], diviso in quattro settimane, e ciascheduna di esse in sei giornate. Florence: Zanobi Pignoni, 1622.Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo. Politicorum libri VIII latine ex versione Leonardi Aretini. Rome: E. Silber, 1492.Google Scholar
Capella (Capra), Galeazzo Flavio. Della eccellenza et dignità delle donne, ed. Doglio, M. L.. 2nd ed. Rome: Bulzoni Editore, [1525] 2001.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. Il Libro del cortegiano, ed. Bonora, Ettore. Milan: Mursia, 1972.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. Il Cortegiano di Baldessare Castiglione, trans. and eds. Busi, A. and Covito, C.. Milan: Rizzoli, 1993.Google Scholar
Castiglione, Baldassare. The Book of the Courtier, trans. Charles S. Singleton. New York: Doubleday, 1959.Google Scholar
Dante, (Alighieri, Dante). Convivio: A Dual-Language Critical Edition, ed. and trans. Frisardi, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentaire sur le banquet de Platon, ed. and trans. Marcel, Raymond. Paris: Les belles lettres, 1956.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentary on Plato’s Symposium, trans. and intro. Sears Reynolds Jayne. Columbia: University of Missouri, 1944.Google Scholar
Hippocrates, . Oeuvres complètes d’ Hippocrate, trans. and ed. Littré, E.. Paris: J. B. Baillière, 1839–61.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livius, trans. C. E. Detmold. New York: Modern Library, 1950.Google Scholar
Maggi, Vincenzo. Un brieve trattato dell’eccellentia delle donne. Brescia: Damiano de Turlini, 1545.Google Scholar
Naugerius, Andreas. Andreae Naugerii: Opera Omnia, ed. Vulpius, J. A.. Padova: Cominus, 1718.Google Scholar
de Pizan, Christine. Debate of the “Romance of the Rose,” ed. and trans. Hult, David F.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotinus. The Essential Plotinus: Representative Treatises from the Enneads, trans. E. J. O’Brien. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1964.Google Scholar
Plutarch. Moralia, trans. Frank Cole Babbitt. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Tasso, Torquato. Discorso della virtù feminile e donnesca, ed. Doglio, M. L.. Palermo: Sellerio Editore, [1582] 1997.Google Scholar
Angenot, Marc. Les Champions des femmes: examen du discours sur la supériorité des femmes, 1400–1800. Montreal: Presses de l’Université du Québec, 1977.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre. Dictionnaire historique et critique, 3rd ed. Rotterdam: Michel Bohm, 1720.Google Scholar
Benedetti, Laura. “Arcangela Tarabotti e Lucrezia Marinella: Appunti per un dialogo mancato,” Modern Language Notes 129 (3S) (2014), 87–97.Google Scholar
Benedetti, Laura. “Le Essortationi di Lucrezia Marinella: L’ultimo messaggio di una misteriosa Veneziana,” Italica 85 (4) (2008), 381–395.Google Scholar
Bolufer, Mónica. “Medicine and the Querelle des Femmes in Early Modern Spain,” Medical History 29 (2009), 86–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwsma, William J. Venice and the Defense of Republican Liberty. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadden, Joan. Meanings of Sex Difference in the Middle Ages: Medicine, Science, and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Cagnolati, Antonella. “Un duello in punta di penna: Strategie antimisogine nella Nobiltà.” In Cagnolati, Antonella (ed.), A Portrait of a Renaissance Feminist: Lucrezia Marinella’s Life and Works. Rome: Aracne, 2013, 41–66.Google Scholar
Chemello, Adriana. “La donna, il modello, l’immaginario: Moderata Fonte e Lucrezia Marinella.” In Marina Zancan (ed.), Nel cerchio della luna: Figure di donna in alcuni testi del XVI secolo. Venice: Marsilio, 1983, 95–170.Google Scholar
Chiappini, Luciano. Eleanora d’Aragona, prima Duchessa di Ferrara. Rovigo: S.T.E.R., 1956.Google Scholar
Cox, Virginia. “Gender and Eloquence in Ercole de’ Roberti’s Portia and Brutus ,” Renaissance Quarterly 62 (2009), 60–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Virginia. “Members, Muses, and Mascots: Women and the Italian Academies.” In Everson, Jane, Reidy, Denis V., and Sampson, Lisa, (eds.), The Italian Academies, 1525–1700: Networks of Culture, Innovation, and Dissent. Cambridge and Abingdon: MHRA and Routledge, 2016, 132–167.Google Scholar
Cox, Virginia. The Prodigious Muse: Women’s Writing in Counter-Reformation Italy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Virginia. “The Single Self: Feminist Thought and the Marriage Market in Early Modern Venice,” Renaissance Quarterly XLVIII (1995), 513–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Virginia. Women’s Writing in Italy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Crawford, K. “Marsilio Ficino, Neoplatonism, and the Problem of Sex,” Renaissance and Reformation, 28 (2) (Spring 2004), 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daenens, Francine. “Superiore perché inferior: il paradosso della superiorità in alcuni trattati italiani del Cinquecento.” In Gentili, V., (ed.), Trasgressione tragica e norma domestica. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 1983, 11–50.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, Marguerite. “Marinella and Her Interlocutors: Hot Blood, Hot Words, Hot Deeds,” Philosophical Studies 174 (10) (2017), 2525–2537. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-016-0730-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deslauriers, Marguerite. “Political Rule over Women in Politics I.” In Lockwood, T. and Samaras, T., (eds.), Aristotle’s Politics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, 55–75.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, Marguerite. “The Conceptualization of Masculine Authority as Unjust: Tyranny in 17th Century Venice,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 27 (4) (2019), 718–737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1537256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deslauriers, Marguerite. “The Superiority of Seventeenth Century Women,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association, July 1–19, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2019.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dialeti, Androniki. “A Woman Defending Women: Breaking with Tradition in Lucrezia Marinella’s La nobiltà, et eccellenze delle donne.” In Cagnolati, Antonella (ed.), A Portrait of a Renaissance Feminist: Lucrezia Marinella’s Life and Works. Rome: Aracne, 2013, 67–104.Google Scholar
Ducharme, Isabelle. “Marguerite Buffet: lectrice de la Querelle des femmes.” In Brouard-Arends, I. (ed.), Lectrices d’ancien régime. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2003, 311–320.Google Scholar
Firenzuola, Agnolo. On the Beauty of Women, Eisenbichler, K., and Murray, J. (trans. and eds.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Galen, . Works on Human Nature, Vol. 1 Mixtures (De Temperamentis), Singer, P. N. and van der Eijk, Philip J. (eds. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd. “Plotinus,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/plotinus.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Felix. “The Venetian Constitution in Florentine Political Thought.” In Rubinstein, Nicolai (ed.), Florentine Studies: Politics and Society in Renaissance Florence, London: Faber and Faber, 1968, 463–500.Google Scholar
Gogol, Ryan. “The Literary Exchange between Lucrezia Marinella and Cristofano Bronzini.” In Marinella, L., De’ gesti eroici e della vita meravigliosa della Serafica S. Caterina da Siena, Maggi, A. (ed.). Ravenna: Longo, 2011, 213–228.Google Scholar
Haskins, Susan. “A Portrait.” In Cagnolati, Antonella (ed.), A Portrait of a Renaissance Feminist: Lucrezia Marinella’s Life and Works. Rome: Aracne, 2013, 11–40.Google Scholar
Haskins, Susan. “Vexatious Litigant, or the Case of Lucrezia Marinella? New Documents Concerning Her Life (Part I).” Nouvelles de la République des Lettres 1 (2006), 80–128.Google Scholar
Haskins, Susan. “Vexatious Litigant, or the Case of Lucrezia Marinella? New Documents Concerning Her Life (Part II).” Nouvelles de la République des Lettres 1–2 (2007), 203–230.Google Scholar
Hult, David F. “The Roman de la rose, Christine de Pizan, and the querelle des femmes.” In Dinshaw, Carolyn and Wallace, David (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Women’s Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Carolyn. “Margherita Cantelmo and the Worth of Women in Renaissance Italy.” In Green, Karen and Mews, Constant (eds.), Virtue Ethics for Women 1250-1500. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011, 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Constance. Renaissance Feminism: Literary Texts and Political Models. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouanna, Jacques. Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen: Selected Papers, van der Eijk, Philip (ed.), Neil Allies (trans.). Leiden: Brill, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Joan. “Early Feminist Theory and the ‘Querelle des Femmes,’ 1400–1789.” Signs 8 (1) (1982), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Helen. Hippocrates’ Woman: Reading the Female Body in Ancient Greece. New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
King, Margaret L. “A Return to the Ancient World?” In The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern European History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 3–28.Google Scholar
King, Margaret L. “Six Learned Women of the Italian Renaissance,” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 59:3 (Fall 1976), 280–304.Google Scholar
Kolsky, Stephen. “Moderata Fonte, Lucrezia Marinella, Giuseppe Passi: An Early Seventeenth-Century Feminist Controversy.” The Modern Language Review 96 (4) (2001): 973–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolsky, Stephen. The Ghost of Boccaccio: Writings on Famous Women in Renaissance Italy. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolsky, Stephen. “The Literary Career of Lucrezia Marinella (1571–1653).” In Kent, F. W. & Zika, C. (eds.), Rituals, Images, and Words: Varieties of Cultural Expression in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Turnhout: Brepols, 2005, 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Frederic C. “At the Roots of Republicanism,” The American Historical Review 71: 2 (1966), 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, Rebecca. “Lucrezia Marinella’s Feminism and the Authority of the Classics,” unpublished paper, 1995.Google Scholar
Lavocat, Françoise. “Introduzione.” In Marinella, Lucrezia, Arcadia felice. Florence: Olschki, 1998, vii–lx.Google Scholar
Leunissen, Mariska. From Natural Character to Moral Virtue in Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévêque, P. Aurea catena Homeri: une etude sur l’allégorie Grecque: Annales Littéraires De L’université De Besancon, Vol. 27. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1959.Google Scholar
Libby, Lester J. “Venetian History and Political Thought after 1509.” Studies in the Renaissance 20 (1973), 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Hendrik. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Maclean, Ian. The Renaissance Notion of Woman: A Study in the Fortunes of Scholasticism and Medical Science in European Intellectual Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggi, Vincenzo. Un brieve trattato dell’eccellentia delle donne. In Sandra Plastina, Mollezza della carne e sotigliezza dell’ingegno: la natura della donna nel Rinascimento europeo. Rome: Carocci, 2017, 147–162.Google Scholar
Malpezzi Price, Paola and Ristaino, Christine. Lucrezia Marinella and the “Querelle Des Femmes” in Seventeenth-Century Italy. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Manca, Joseph. “‘Constantia et Forteza’: Eleanora d’Aragona’s Famous Matrons.” Source: Notes in the History of Art, 19:2, 2000, 13–20.Google Scholar
Mazzeo, Joseph Anthony. “The Augustinian Conception of Beauty and Dante’s Convivio.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 15:4 (June 1957), 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWebb, C. Debating the Roman de la Rose: A Critical Anthology. New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Moss, Jessica. “Appearances and Calculations: Plato’s Division of the Soul.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 34 (2008), 35–68.Google Scholar
Nutton, Vivian. “God, Galen and the Depaganization of Ancient Medicine.” In Biller, P. and Ziegler, J. (eds.), Religion and Medicine in the Middle Ages. York: York Medieval Press, 2001, 17–32.Google Scholar
Panizza, Letizia. “Introduction.” In Anne Dunhill (ed. and trans.), Lucrezia Marinella: The Nobility and Excellence of Women and the Defects and Vices of Men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Panizza, Letizia. “Introduction.” In Tarabotti, Arcangela, Paternal Tyranny, Letizia Panizza (trans. and ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004, 1–32.Google Scholar
Panizza, Letizia. “Platonic Love on the Rocks: Castiglione Counter-Currents in Renaissance Italy.” In Clucas, Stephen, Forshaw, Peter J., and Rees, Valery (eds.), Laus Platonici Philosophi. Leiden: Brill, 2011, 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, John J. “Introduction” in Cappellanus, Andreas, The Art of Courtly Love. New York: Columbia University Press, 1960, 3–24.Google Scholar
Piana, Marco. “Divinae Pulchritudinis Imago: The Neoplatonic Construction of Female Identity in Lucrezia Marinella’s La nobiltà et l’eccellenze delle donne (1601).” In Santosuosso, S. (ed.), Genealogie. Re-Writing the Canon: Women Writing in XVI–XVII Century Italy. Seville: Arcibel Editores, 2018, 199–221.Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. “Was There a Querelle des femmes in Early Modern Medicine?” Arenal: Revista de Historia de las Mujeres, 20 (3) (2013), 213–241.Google Scholar
Ray, Meredith K. Daughters of Alchemy: Women and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Audrey N. M. “The Platonic Ideas as the Thoughts of God,” Mnemosyne, Fourth Series 7:2 (1954), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Sarah Gwyneth. The Birth of Feminism: Woman as Intellect in Renaissance Italy and England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Nicolai. “Political Ideas in Sienese Art: The Frescoes by Ambrogio Lorenzetti and Taddeo di Bartolo in the Palazzo Pubblico.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 21:3/4 (1958), 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. Aristotle and the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Lisa. “The Outward and Inward Beauty of Early Modern Women.” Revue Philosophique de La France et de l’Étranger 203:3 (2013), 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Amy. “Latin in Lucrezia Marinella’s Essortationi alle donne (1645): Subverting the Voice of Authority.” In Del Soldato, E. and Rizzi, A. (eds.), City, Court, Academy: Language Choice in Early Modern Italy. London: Routledge, 2017, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Elissa B., “Introduction” in Tarabotti, Arcangela, Antisatire: In Defense of Women, against Franceco Buoninsegni, Weaver, E. B. (ed. and trans.). New York/Toronto: Iter Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Willer, Annika. “Silent Deletions: The Two Different Editions of Lucrezia Marinella’s La Nobiltà et l’eccellenza delle donne,” Bruniana e campanelliana: ricerche filosofiche e materiali storico-testuali, 19:1 (2013), 207–219.Google Scholar