Element contents
Series: Elements in Ancient Philosophy
The Method of Hypothesis and the Nature of Soul in Plato's Phaedo
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2021
Summary
This study of Plato's Phaedo promotes better understanding of its arguments for the soul's immortality by showing how Plato intended them, not as proofs, but as properly dialectical arguments functioning in accordance with the method of hypothesis. Unlike the argument for the soul's immortality in the Phaedrus, which does seem intended as a proof, the Phaedo arguments are proceeding toward the first principles that could serve as the basis for a proof - the most important being an account of the soul's own essential nature. This study attends to the substantial progress the Phaedo makes toward such an account. It also considers Socrates' epistemic situation in the dialogue and the problem of whether his confidence in the face of death is misplaced if his arguments have not been proofs before considering how the concluding myth draws together several of the dialogue's main themes.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Ancient PhilosophyOnline ISBN: 9781108946254Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 11 February 2021
References
Ackrill, J. L. 1973. “Anamnesis in the Phaedo: remarks on 73c–75c.” In his Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997: 13–32. Originally published in E. N. Lee et al., eds., Exegesis and Argument. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1973: 177–95.Google Scholar
Ausland, Hayden. 1997. “On reading Plato mimetically.” American Journal of Philology, 118: 371–416.Google Scholar
Bacon, Helen H. 1990. “The poetry of Phaedo.” In Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press: 147–62.Google Scholar
Baltussen, Han. 2015. “Strato of Lampsacus as a reader of Plato’s Phaedo: his critique of the soul’s immortality.” In Delcomminette, Sylvain, d’Hoine, Pieter, and Gavray, Marc-Antoine (eds.), Ancient Readings of Plato’s Phaedo. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill: 37–62.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 1978. “Plato’s cyclical argument.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 8: 397–419. Repr. in J. Barnes, Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I, ed. Maddalena Bonelli. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011: 303–22.Google Scholar
Bedu-Addo, J. T. 1979. “The role of the hypothetical method in the Phaedo.” Phronesis, 24: 111–32.Google Scholar
Benson, Hugh H. 2015. Clitophon’s Challenge: Dialectic in Plato’s Meno, Phaedo, and Republic. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Betegh, Gabor. 2006. “Eschatology and cosmology: models and problems.” In Sassi, Maria Michela (ed.), La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell-età dei presocratici. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale: 27–50.Google Scholar
Betegh, Gabor. 2018. “Cosmic and human cognition in the Timaeus.” In Sisko, John (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity. London: Routledge: 120–40.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 1986. “The argument for immortality in Plato’s Phaedrus.” Phronesis, 31: 1–26.Google Scholar
Blondell, Ruby. 2002. The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blyth, Dougal. 1997. “The ever-moving soul in Plato’s Phaedrus.” American Journal of Philology, 118: 185–217.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George. 2004. “Phaedo of Elis and Plato on the soul.” Phronesis, 49: 1–23.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, trans. E. L. Minar, Jr. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Denyer, Nicholas. 2007. “The Phaedo’s final argument.” In Scott, Dominic (ed.), Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 87–96.Google Scholar
Dorter, Kenneth. 1982. Plato’s Phaedo: An Interpretation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Dorter, Kenneth. 2001. “‘Deathless is indestructible: if not we need another argument’: an implicit argument in the Phaedo.” In Havlíček, Aleš and Karfík, Filip (eds.), Plato’s Phaedo: Proceedings of the Second Symposium Platonicum Pragense. Prague: ΟΙΚΟΥΜΕΝΗ: 406–23.Google Scholar
Duke, E. A., Hicken, W. F., Nicoll, W. S. M., Robinson, D. B., and Strachan, J. C. G. (eds.). 1995. Platonis Opera I, Tetralogias I-II Continens. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ebert, Theodor. 2001. “Sokrates über seinen Umgang mit Hypotheseis (‘Phaidon’ 100A): Ein Problem und ein Vorschlag zur Lösung.” Hermes, 129(4): 467–73.Google Scholar
Ebert, Theodor. 2014. “‘Wenn ich einen schönen Mythos vortragen darf …’. Zu Status, Herkunft und Funktion des Schlussmythos in Platons Phaidon.” In Janka, Markus and Schäfer, Christian (eds.), Platon als Mythologe: Interpretationen zu den Mythen in Platons Dialogen, 2nd ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft: 419–37.Google Scholar
Ebrey, David. 2013. “A new philosophical tool in the Meno: 86e–87c.” Ancient Philosophy, 33: 75–96.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Ludwig. 1949. “The function of the myth in Plato’s philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 10: 463–81.Google Scholar
Edmonds, Radcliffe, G., III. 2004. Myths of the Underworld Journey: Plato, Aristophanes, and the “Orphic” Gold Tablets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, Radcliffe, G., III. 2013. Redefining Ancient Orphism: A Study in Greek Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Franck. 2002. “La méthode et les hypothèses en Phédon 99d–102a.” Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 100: 650–80.Google Scholar
Franklin, Lee. 2005. “Recollection and philosophical reflection in Plato’s Phaedo.” Phronesis, 50: 289–314.Google Scholar
Frede, Dorothea. 1978. “The final proof of the immortality of the soul in Plato’s Phaedo 102a–107a.” Phronesis, 23: 24–41.Google Scholar
Frede, Dorothea. 2011. “Das Argument aus den essentiellen Eigenschaften (102a–107d).” In Müller, Jörn (ed.), Platon: Phaidon. Berlin: Akademie Verlag: 143–57.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. 1992. “Plato’s arguments and the dialogue form.” In Klagge, James C. and Smith, Nicholas D. (eds.), Methods of Interpreting Plato and His Dialogues, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy suppl. vol. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 201–19.Google Scholar
Frutiger, Perceval. 1930. Les mythes de Platon: Étude philosophique et littéraire. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Gertz, Sebastian. 2015. “From ‘immortal’ to ‘imperishable’: Damascius on the final argument in Plato’s Phaedo.” In Delcomminette, Sylvain, d’Hoine, Pieter, and Gavray, Marc-Antoine (eds.), Ancient Readings of Plato’s Phaedo. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill: 240–55.Google Scholar
Griswold, Charles L., Jr. 1988. Platonic Writings/Platonic Readings. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huffman, Carl A. 1993. Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, Michael. 2009. “Plato’s eschatological myths.” In Partenie, Catalin (ed.), Plato’s Myths. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 28–50.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. 1977. “Le obiezioni di Stratone al Fedone e l’epistemologia peripatetica nel primo ellenismo.” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 105: 285–306.Google Scholar
Kanayama, Yahei. 2000. “The methodology of the second voyage and the proof of the soul’s indestructibility in Plato’s Phaedo.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 18: 41–100.Google Scholar
Karasmanis, V. 2011. “Ἀπαγωγή: Hippocrates of Chios and Plato’s hypothetical method in the Meno.” In Longo, A. (ed.), Argument from Hypothesis in Ancient Philosophy, Elenchos 59. Naples: Bibliopolis: 21–41.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Peter. 1995. Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and the Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Hendrik. 2009. “Ancient theories of soul.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/ancient-soul.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, Jaap. 2014. “Alcmaeon and Plato on soul.” Études platoniciennes [online], 11: http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/508.Google Scholar
McKirahan, Richard. 2016. “Philolaus on the soul.” In Renger, Almut-Barbara and Stavru, Allessandro (eds.), Pythagorean Knowledge from the Ancient to the Modern World: Askesis, Religion, Science. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz: 63–76.Google Scholar
Modrak, Deborah K. W. 2011. “Physicalism in Strato’s psychology.” In Desclos, Marie-Laurence and Fortenbaugh, William W. (eds.), Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Transaction Publishers: 383–97.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kathryn A. 2000. Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Michael L. 1984. “Sense-perception and recollection in the Phaedo.” Phronesis, 29: 237–51.Google Scholar
Napolitano Valditara, Linda M. 1991. “τί ἐστιν – ποῖόν ἐστιν: un aspetto dell’argomentatività diallettica del Menone.” Elenchos, 12: 197–220.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Denis. 1967. “The last argument of Plato’s Phaedo. I.” The Classical Quarterly, n.s. 17: 198–231.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Denis. 2007. “‘Immortel’ et ‘impérissable’ dans le Phédon de Platon.” The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 1(2): 109–262.Google Scholar
Pender, Elizabeth. 2012. “The rivers of Tartarus: Plato’s geography of dying and coming-back-to-life.” In Collobert, C., Destrée, P., and Gonzalez (eds.), F. J., Plato and Myth: Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill: 199–233.Google Scholar
Politis, V. 2010. “Explanation and essence in Plato’s Phaedo.” In Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press: 62–114.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. M. 1971. “The argument for immortality in Plato’s Phaedrus.” In Anton, J. P. and Kustas, K. L. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press: 345–53.Google Scholar
Rosetti, Livio. 1980. “Ricerche sui ‘Dialoghi Socratici’ de Fedone e di Euclide.” Hermes, 108: 183–200.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. 1993b. “Philosophy and literature: the arguments of Plato’s Phaedo.” In Cleary, John J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 7. Lanham, MD and London: University Press of America: 159–181.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 1991. “Teleology and myth in the Phaedo.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 5: 359–83.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 1995. “The dramatis personae of Plato’s Phaedo.” In Smiley, Timothy (ed.), Philosophical Dialogues: Plato, Hume, Wittgenstein – Proceedings of the British Academy, 85: 3–26.Google Scholar
Sedley, David 1996. “Plato’s Phaedo in the third century B.C.” In ὍΔΟΙ ΔΙΖΗΣΙΟΣ, le vie della ricerca: studi in onore di Francesco Adorno. Florence: L. S. Olschki: 447–55.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 2006. “Form-particular resemblance in Plato’s Phaedo.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106: 311–27.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 2009. “Three kinds of Platonic immortality.” In Dorothea Frede and Burkhard Reis (eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter: 145–62.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 2012. “Plato’s theory of change at Phaedo 70–71.” In Patterson, Richard, Karasmanis, Vassilis, and Hermann, Arnold (eds.), Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift at Delphi in Honor of Charles Kahn. Las Vegas/Zurich/Athens: Parmenides Publishing: 147–63.Google Scholar
Sharples, Robert W. 2011. “Strato of Lampsacus: the sources, texts and translations.” In Desclos, Marie-Laurence and Fortenbaugh, William W. (eds.), Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers: 5–229.Google Scholar
Strachan, J. C. G. 1970. “Who did forbid suicide at Phaedo 62b?” The Classical Quarterly, 20: 216–20.Google Scholar
Svavarsson, Svavar Hrafn. 2009. “Plato on Forms and conflicting appearances: the argument of Phaedo 74a9–c6.” Classical Quarterly, 59: 60–74.Google Scholar
Warren, James. 2001. “Socratic suicide.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 121: 91–106.Google Scholar
Warren, James. 2006. “Psychic disharmony: Philoponus and Epicurus on Plato’s Phaedo.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 30: 235–59.Google Scholar
Weller, C. 1995. “Fallacies in the Phaedo again.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 77: 121–34.Google Scholar
Westerink., L. G. 1977. The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo, vol. 2: Damascius. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
White, F. C. 2006. “Socrates, philosophers and death: two contrasting arguments in Plato’s Phaedo.” The Classical Quarterly, 56: 445–58.Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by