Element contents
Series: Elements in Ancient Philosophy
Properties in Ancient Metaphysics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2023
Summary
This Element provides an overview of how the ancient thinkers (Anaxagoras, Plato and Aristotle) theorised about properties; such overview puts in relief the inquiries, problems and solutions they were pursuing while engaged in dialogue with each other. It examines alternative philosophical perspectives existing in antiquity concerning the explanation of property qualification, qualitative similarity, compositeness, and oneness. It further argues that although Plato was the first to conceptualise recurring universals, he did not reify them and did not admit them in his ontology; it was Aristotle who did, and developed his metaphysics around them. Aristotle, building on Plato's work, identified the metaphysical phenomenon of the instantiation of properties and developed an account for it. Finally, this Element outlines Aristotle's 'sophisticated' account of the oneness of a substance and argues that it was not hylomorphic.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Ancient PhilosophyOnline ISBN: 9781009105866Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 21 December 2023
References
Primary Sources
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1984), The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols. The Revised Oxford Translation – Bollingen Series.Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2007), Anaxagoras of Clazomenae. Fragments and Testimonia. A text and translation with notes and essays by Patricia Curd. University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secondary Sources
Ackrill, J. L. (1963), Aristotle Categories and De Interpretatione, Clarendon University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1989), A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1980), ‘Against “Ostrich” Nominalism: A Reply to Michael Devitt’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61(4): 440–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentlinger, J. (1972), ‘Incomplete Predicates and the Two-World Theory of the Phaedo’, Phronesis 17(1): 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. and Galluzzo, G. (eds.) (2013), Universals in Ancient Philosophy, Edizioni della Normale, 113–37.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. M. (1999), ‘The Logic of the Third Man’, The Philosophical Review 80(4): 448–75.Google Scholar
Costa, D. (2019), ‘An Argument against Aristotelian Universals’, Synthese 198: 4331–8.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (1983), ‘Plato and Aristotle on Form and Substance’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, New Series 29 (209): 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. (1993), On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Frey, C. (2015), ‘From Blood to Flesh: Homonymy, Unity, and Ways of Being in Aristotle’, Ancient Philosophy 35 (2): 375–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galluzzo, G. and Loux, M. J. (eds.) (2015), The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M.-L. (1989), Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
González-Varela, J. E. (2020), ‘The One over Many Principle of Republic 596a’, Apeiron 53 (4): 339–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harte, V. (2002), Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harte, V. (2008), ‘Plato’s Metaphysics’, in Fine, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford University Press, 455–80.Google Scholar
Harte, V. (2009), ‘What’s a Particular, and What Makes It So? Some Thoughts, Mainly about Aristotle’, in Sharples, R. (ed.), Particulars in Greek Philosophy, Brill, 97–125.Google Scholar
Jaworski, W. (2016), Structure and the Metaphysics of Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koons, R. (2014), ‘Staunch vs. Faint-Hearted Hylomorphism: Toward an Aristotelian Account of Composition’, Res Philosophica 91: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krizan, M. (2016), ‘Prime Matter without Extension’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (4): 523–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krizan, M. (2018)‚ ‘Primary Qualities and Aristotle’s Elements‘, Ancient Philosophy 38(1): 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1983), ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61(4):343–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loux, M. (1991), Primary Ousia: An Essay on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z and H, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (2012), ‘A Neo-Aristotelian Substance Ontology: Neither Relational Nor Constituent’, in Tahko, T. (ed.), Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press, 229–48.Google Scholar
Mann, W. R. (2000), The Discovery of Things: Aristotle’s Categories and Their Context, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, W-R., (2000), The Discovery of Things: Aristotle’s Categories and Their Context. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2008), ‘“Is Being One Only One?” – The Argument for the Uniqueness of Platonic Forms’, ApeironXLI (4), 211–27.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2013), ‘Aristotle’s Hylomorphism without Reconditioning’, Philosophical Inquiry 37(1/2): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2015), ‘Anaxagoras’s Qualitative Gunk’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23(3): 402–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2017), Everything in Everything: Anaxagoras’s Metaphysics, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2018), ‘Potentiality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, in Engelhard, K. and Quante, M. (eds.), The Handbook of Potentiality, Springer, 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2020), ‘Hylomorphic Unity’, in Bliss, R. and Miller, R. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metametaphysics, 284–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2021), Forms and Structure in Plato’s Metaphysics, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2022b), ‘Why Studying the History of Philosophy Matters’, Think. A Journal of the Royal Institute for Philosophy 21(60): 5–20.Google Scholar
Maurin, A.-S. (2018), ‘Tropes’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/tropes.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1925), ‘A Defense of Common Sense’, in Muirhead, J. H. (ed.), Contemporary British Philosophy, George Allen and Unwin, 192–233.Google Scholar
Orilia, F. and Paolini Paoletti, M. (2020) ‘Properties’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/properties/.Google Scholar
Parry, R. D. (1980), ‘The Uniqueness Proof for Forms in Republic 10’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson Siebels, A. (2018), ‘Unity and Plurality in Hylomorphic Composition’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2000), ‘What Is the Problem of Universals?’, Mind 109(434): 255–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Pereyra, G (2019) ‘Nominalism in Metaphysics’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nominalism-metaphysics/. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/nominalism-metaphysics.Google Scholar
Scaltsas, T. (1990), ‘Is a Whole Identical to Its Parts?’, Mind XCIX (396): 583–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaltsas, T. (1994), Substances and Universals in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1972), ‘Metaph. Z 3: Some Suggestions’, Phronesis 17 (2): 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1996), ‘Likeness and Likenesses in the Parmenides’, in Gill, Christopher and McCabe, Mary Margaret (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato, Oxford University Press, 49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (2013), ‘Plato and the One-Over-Many Principle’ in Chiaradonna, R. and Galluzzo, G. (eds.), Universals in Ancient Philosophy, Edizioni della Normale, 113–37.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (2022), ‘Hylomorphisms’, Dialogoi. Ancient Philosophy Today 4(1): 96–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, A. (2002), The Dialectic of Essence: A Study of Plato’s Metaphysics, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strang, C. (1972), ‘Plato and the Third Man’, in Vlastos, G. (ed.), Plato: Metaphysics and Epistemolgy Vol. I. Macmillan, 184–200.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1950), ‘The physical theory of Anaxagoras’, The Philosophical Review 59 (1): 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1965), ‘The “Third Man” Argument in the Parmenides’, in Allen, R. E. (ed.), Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, Routledge and Kegan, 231–63.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1969), ‘Plato’s “Third Man” Argument (Parm. 132a1-b2): Text and Logic’, Philosophical Quarterly 19: 289–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedin, M. V. (2000), Aristotle’s Theory of Substance. The Categories and Metaphysics Z. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by