Element contents
Series: Elements in Phonology
Psycholinguistics and Phonology
The Forgotten Foundations of Generative Phonology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2025
Summary
Research over the last few decades has consistently questioned the sufficiency of abstract/ discrete phonological representations based on putative misalignments between predictions from such representations and observed experimental results. The authors first suggest that many of the arguments ride on misunderstandings of the original claims from generative phonology, and that the typical evidence furnished is consistent with those claims. They then focus in on the phenomenon of incomplete neutralisation and show that it is consistent with the classic generative phonology view. The authors further point out that extant accounts of the phenomenon do not achieve important desiderata and typically do not provide an explanation for either the phenomenon itself, or why there are actually at least two different kinds of incomplete neutralisation that don't stem from task confounds. Finally, they present new experimental data and explain that the phenomenon is an outcome of planning using abstract/discrete phonological knowledge.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in PhonologyOnline ISBN: 9781009347631Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 20 February 2025
References
Archangeli, Diana (1988). ‘Aspects of underspecificationtheory’. Phonology 5.2, pp. 183–207. https://doi.org.10.1017/S0952675700002268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Alan (2000). ‘The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?’. Trends in cognitive sciences 4.11, pp. 417–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, Scott A. and Hoffmann, John P. (2002). ‘The dynamics of self-esteem: A growth-curve analysis’. Journal of youth and adolescence 31.2, pp. 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming (1990). ‘Fanqie languages and reduplication’. Linguistic inquiry 21.3, pp. 317–350. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178680.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming (1992). ‘Toward a typology of tone sandhi’. In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Ed. by Buszard-Welcher, Laura A., Evans, Jonathan, Peterson, David, Wee, Lionel and Weigel, William. Vol. 18. 2, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., and Tily, H. J. (2013). ‘Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal’. Journal of memory and language Ed. by Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph, and Tily, Harry J. 68.3, pp. 1–26. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, and Walker, Steven (2021). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.Google Scholar
Beltzung, Jean-Marc and Wallet, Lucille (2014). ‘Réajustements temporels et syllabiques après l’effacement optionnel du schwa en français’. In SHS Web of Conferences. Ed. by Neveu, Franck, Blumenthal, Peter, Hriba, Linda, Gerstenberg, Annette, Meinschaefer, Judith, and Prévost, Sophie. Vol. 8. EDP Sciences, pp. 1227–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benua, Laura (1995). ‘Identity effects in morphological truncation’. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers, 18, Ed. by Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura W., and Urbanczyk, Suzanne. GLSA, UMass Amherst, pp. 33–66.Google Scholar
Berko, Jean (1958). ‘The child’s learning of English morphology’. WORD 14.2–3, pp. 150–177. https://doi.org.10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boring, Edwin Garrigues (1942). ‘Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology’. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Braver, Aaron (2014). ‘Imperceptible incomplete neutralization: Production, non-identifiability, and non-discriminability in American English flapping’. Lingua 152, pp. 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braver, Aaron (2019). ‘Modelling incomplete neutralisation with weighted phonetic constraints’. Phonology 36.1, pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braver, Aaron and Kawahara, Shigeto (2016). ‘Incomplete neutralization in Japanese monomoraic lengthening’. In Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology. Vol. 2. Ed. by Albright, Adam and Fullwood, Michelle A..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromberger, Sylvain and Halle, Morris (2000). ‘The ontology of phonology (revised)’. Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues. Ed. by Burton-Roberts, Noel, Carr, Philip, and Docherty, Gerard, pp. 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. and Goldstein, Louis H. (1988). ‘Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology’. Phonetica 45, pp. 140–155. https://doi.org.10.1159/000261823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browman, Catherine P. and Goldstein, Louis H. (1989). ‘Articulatory gestures as phonological units’. Phonology 6.2, pp. 201–251. https://doi.org.10.1017/S0952675700001019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. and Goldstein, Louis H. (1990). ‘Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech’. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology. Vol. 1. Ed. by Kingston, John and Beckman, Mary E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 341–376. https://doi.org.10.1017/CB09780511627736.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and McNeill, David (1966). ‘The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon’. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 5.4, pp. 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi (1994). Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. (1994). ‘A view of phonology from a cognitive and functional perspective’. Cognitive linguistics 5.4, pp. 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. (2001). ‘Phonology and language use’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Edward F., Rieger, Jochem W., Johnson, Keith, Berger, Mitchel S., Barbara, Nicholas M., and Knight, Robert T. (2010). ‘Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus’. Nature neuroscience 13.11, pp. 1428–1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, Yuen-Ren (1930). ‘A system of tone letters’. Le maître phonétique 30, pp. 24–27.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y. (2000). Tone sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Si and Bin, Li (2021). ‘Statistical modeling of application completeness of two tone sandhi rules’. Journal of chinese linguistics 49.1, pp. 106–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Si, Zhang, Caicai, McCollum, Adam G, and Wayland, Ratree (2017). ‘Statistical modelling of phonetic and phonologised perturbation effects in tonal and non-tonal languages’. Speech communication 88, pp. 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Chin-Chuan (2011). A synchronic phonology of Mandarin Chinese. Vol. 4. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1964). ‘Current issues in linguistic theory’. In the Hague: Mouton. In The Structure of Language. Ed. by Fodor, Janet A. and Katz, J. J., pp. 85–112.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1983). ‘Some conceptual shifts in the study of language’. In Many Questions? Essays in Honor of Sidney Morgenbesser. Ed. by Cauman, Leigh S., Levi, Issac, Parsons, Charles D., and Robert Schwartz, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett pp. 154–169. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1955/1975). The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris (1965). ‘Some controversial questions in phonological theory’. Journal of linguistics 1.2, pp. 97–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Moro, Andrea (2022). The secrets of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Roberts, Ian, and atumull, Jeffrey W (2023). ‘Noam Chomsky: The false promise of chatgpt’. The New York Times 8.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. (1985). ‘The geometry of phonological features’. Phonology yearbook 2, pp. 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène (2000). ‘Consonant cluster phonotactics: A perceptual approach’. PhD diss. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Cowan, Nelson (2008). ‘What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?’ Progress in brain research 169, pp. 323–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coward, Harold G. and Kunjunni Raja, K. (2015). The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume 5: The Philosophy Vol. 1235. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, Robert (2000). “‘How does it work?” vs. “What are the laws?” Two conceptions of psychological explanation’. Ed. by Keil, F. and Wilson, R., pp. 117–145.Google Scholar
Dell, Gary S., Reed, Kristopher D., Adams, David R., and Meyer, Antje S. (2000). ‘Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production’. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning memory and cognition 26.6 pp. 1355–1367. www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0034328780%26doi=10.1037%2f0278-7393.26.6.1355%26partnerID=40%26md5=c8cb6bc14994624319205747ae408f5b.Google ScholarPubMed
Dinnsen, Daniel A. and Charles-Luce, Jan (1984). ‘Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation and individual differences’. Journal of phonetics 12.1, pp. 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, Olga (2005). ‘Incomplete neutralization in Russian final devoicing: Acoustic evidence from native speakers and second language learners’. PhD diss. University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org.10.1017/CBO9780511642005.Google Scholar
Naiyan, Du (2023). ‘Against strict correspondence between phonetic measurements and phonological representations’. PhD diss. Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Naiyan, Du and Durvasula, Karthik (2022). ‘Phonetically incomplete neutralization can be phonologically complete: Evidence from Huai’an Mandarin’. Phonology 39.4, pp. 559–595.Google Scholar
Duanmu, San (1994). ‘Against contour tone units’. Linguistic inquiry 25.4, pp. 555–608.Google Scholar
Duanmu, San (2007). The phonology of standard chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhem, Pierre Maurice Marie (1954). The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durvasula, Karthik and Liter, Adam (2020). ‘There is a simplicity bias when generalising from ambiguous data’. Phonology 37.2, pp. 177–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam and Harald Baayen, R. (2006). ‘The functionality of incomplete neutralization in Dutch: The case of past-tense formation’. Laboratory phonology 8.1, pp. 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda and Swets, Benjamin (2002). ‘How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums’. Journal of memory and language 46.1, pp. 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, John Rupert Firth (1948). ‘Sounds and Peosodies’. Transactions of the philological society 47.1, pp. 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1948.tb00556.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Edward (1995). ‘Auditory features in phonology’. PhD diss. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (2001). ‘Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology’. Phonology 18.1, pp. 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile and Steriade, Donca (1997). ‘Does deletion of French schwa lead to neutralization of lexical distinctions?’ In Eurospeech. Vol. 2, pp. 943–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourakis, M. and Gregory, K. Iverson (1984). ‘On the “Incomplete Neutralization” of German Final Obstruents’. Phonetica 41, pp. 140–149. https://doi.org.10.1159/000261720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. and Benus, Stefan (2006). ‘Dynamics of phonological cognition’. Cognitive science 30.5, pp. 905–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glanzer, Murray and Cunitz, Anita R. (1966). ‘Two storage mechanisms in free recall’. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 5.4, pp. 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen D. (1996). ‘Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory’. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning memory and cognition 22.5, pp. 1166–1183. https://doi.org.10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1166.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldinger, Stephen D. (1997). ‘Words and voices: Perception and production in an episodic lexicon’. Talker variability in speech processing. Ed. by Johnson, Keith and Mullennix, John W.. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 33–66.Google Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen D. (1998). ‘Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access’. Psychological review 105.2, pp. 251–279. https://doi.org.10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldrick, Matthew and Blumstein, Sheila E. (2006). ‘Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters’. Language and cognitive processes 21.6, pp. 649–683. https://doi.org.10.1080/01690960500181332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, Matthew and Cole, Jennifer (2023). ‘Advancement of phonetics in the 21st century: Exemplar models of speech production’. Journal of phonetics 99, p. 101254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouskova, Maria and Hall, Nancy (2009). ‘Acoustics of unstressable vowels in Lebanese Arabic’. In Phonological argumentation: Essays on evidence and motivation. Ed. by Parker, Steve. London: Equinox, pp. 203–225.Google Scholar
Greene, Anthony J., Prepscius, Colin, and Levy, William B. (2000). ‘Primacy versus recency in a quantitative model: Activity is the critical distinction’. Learning and memory 7.1, pp. 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark, Kissock, Madelyn, and Reiss, Charles (2007). ‘Microvariation, variation, and the features of universal grammar’. Lingua 117.4, pp. 645–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris (1954). Why and how do we study sounds of speech? Ed. by Mueller, Hugo J.. Verlag nicht ermittelbar.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris (1959a). ‘Questions of linguistics’. Il nuovo cimento (1955–1965) 13.2, pp. 494–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris (1959b). The sound pattern of Russian: A linguistic and acoustical investigation. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris (1962). ‘Phonology in generative grammar’. Word 18.1, pp. 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris (1978). ‘Comment on S. Singh’s rejoinder to the review of his distinctive features: Theory and validation [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62, 276–277 (1978)]’. The journal of the acoustical society of America 63.1, pp. 278–279. https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article-pdf/63/1/278/11461012/278_1_online.pdf.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. (1985). Speculation about the representation of words in memory. In Fromkin, Victoria (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics, pp. 101–114. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, Robert (1976). ‘The metaphysics of coarticulation’. Journal of phonetics 4.4, pp. 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammarberg, Robert (1982). ‘On redefining coarticulation’. Journal of phonetics 10.2, pp. 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Trevor and Tibshirani, Robert (1995). ‘Generalized additive models for medical research’. Statistical methods in medical research 4.3, pp. 187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, Jennifer, Jannedy, Stefanie, and Mendoza-Denton, Norma (1999). ‘Oprah and/ay: Lexical frequency, referee design and style’. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. University of California Berkeley, CA, pp. 1389–1392.Google Scholar
Hecht, Selig (1924). ‘The visual discrimination of intensity and the Weber-Fechner law’. The journal of general physiology 7.2, p. 235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinz, Jeffrey (2020). ‘Deterministic analysis of optional processes’. Language Sciences Colloquium Series, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Henrich, Nathalie, Sundin, Gunilla, Ambroise, Daniel, d’Alessandro, Christophe, Castellengo, Michele, and Doval, Boris (2003). ‘Just noticeable differences of open quotient and asymmetry coefficient in singing voice’. Journal of voice 17.4, pp. 481–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Borong and Liao, Xudong (2017). Xiandai hanyu [Contemporary Chinese]. Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko and Mester, Armin (2003). ‘On the sources of opacity in OT: Coda processes in German’. In The Syllable in Optimality Theory. Ed. by Féry, Caroline and van de Vijver, Ruben. Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–303. https://doi.org.10.1017/CB09780511497926.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, Junko (1990). ‘Prosodic Minimality in Japanese’. In CLS 26-II: Papers from the Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology. Ed. by Ziolkowski, Michael, Noske, Manuela, and Deaton, Karen, 213–239.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko and Mester, Armin (1999). ‘The phonological lexicon’. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.) The handbook of Japanese linguistics. Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 62–100.Google Scholar
Japan Broadcasting Corporation (1998). The Japanese language pronunciation and accent dictionary. Tokyo: NHK.Google Scholar
Jiao, L. (2004). ‘Huai’an fangyan de shengdiao fenxi [The analysis of tones in Huai’ an dialect]’. Master’s diss. Tianjin, China: Tianjin Normal University.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith (1997). ‘Speech perception without speaker normalisation’. In Talker variability in speech processing. Ed. by Johnson, Keith and Mullennix, John W.. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 145–165.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith and Mullennix, John W., eds. (1997). Talker variability in speech processing. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Allard, Jongman, Qin, Zhen, Zhang, Jie, and Sereno, Joan A. (2017). ‘Just noticeable differences for pitch direction, height, and slope for Mandarin and English listeners’. The journal of the acoustical society of America 142.2, EL163–EL169. https://doi.org.10.1121/1.4995526.Google Scholar
Kahn, Daniel (1976). ‘Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology’. Phd diss. MIT. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1Z16397.Google Scholar
Kang, Hijo and Lee, Hyo-Young (2019). ‘The realizations of /h/ in Seoul and Gwangju Koreans’. The linguistic society of Korea 84, pp. 175–198.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. (1985). ‘Universal phonetics and the organization of grammars’. Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged. Ed. by Fromkin, Victoria A.. New York: Academic Press, pp. 115–132.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. (1990). ‘The window model of coarticulation: Articulatory evidence’. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology. Ed. by Kingston, John and Beckman, Mary E.. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, pp. 451–470. https://doi.org.10.1017/CB09780511627736.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael J. (1995). ‘Morpheme invariance and uniform exponence’. Ms. MIT and Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael J. and Kisseberth, Charles (1977). Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kharlamov, Viktor (2012). ‘Incomplete neutralization and task effects in experimentally-elicited speech: Evidence from the production and perception of word-final devoicing in Russian’. PhD diss. University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana and Goldrick, Matt (2021). ‘Variable pronunciations reveal dynamic intra-speaker variation in speech planning’. Psychonomic bulletin and research. https://doi.org.10.3758/s13423-021-01886-0.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1968). ‘How abstract is phonology?’ In Three dimensions of linguistic theory. Ed. by Fujimura, Osama. Tokyo: Taikusha, pp. 5–56.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1978). ‘Analogical change as a problem for linguistic theory’. Studies in the linguistic sciences 8.2, pp. 77–96.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. (1976). ‘Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence’. The journal of the acoustical society of America 59.5, pp. 1208–1221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruszewski, Mikołaj (1883/1995). ‘Očrk Nauki O Jazyke (An outline of linguistic science). Writings in general linguistics’. Ed. by Koerner, K., pp. 43–173.Google Scholar
Kuo, Yu-ching, Xu, Yi, and Yip, Moira (2007). ‘The phonetics and phonology of apparent cases of iterative tonal change in Standard Chinese’. In Experimental studies in word and sentence prosody. Ed. by Gussenhoven, Carlos and Riad, Tomas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1963). ‘The social motivation of a sound change’. Word 19.3, pp. 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1968). ‘Changes in the problem of inductive logic’. In Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. 51. Elsevier, pp. 315–417.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1970). ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965. Ed. by Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan. Vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196. https://doi.org.10.1017/CB09781139171434.009.Google Scholar
Lebel, Jean-Guy (1968). ‘Allongement compensatoire de quelques consonnes par suite de la chute du’. Revue de phonétique appliquée 7, pp. 53–77.Google Scholar
Leben, William Ronald (1973). ‘Suprasegmental phonology’. PhD diss. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Lee, Seunghun J., Villegas, Julian, and Mira, Oh (2023). ‘The Non-coalescence of/h/and incomplete neutralization in South Jeolla Korean’. Language and speech 66.2, pp. 442–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lionnet, Florian (2017). ‘A theory of subfeatural representations: The case of rounding harmony in Laal’. Phonology 34.3, pp. 523–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, John J. (2020). ‘Segmental phonology in Ancient India?’ Language 96.2, e97–e113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, John J. (2024). Modern linguistics in ancient India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramer, Manaster, Alexis, (1996). ‘A letter from an incompletely neutral phonologist’. Journal of phonetics 24.4, pp. 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascaró, Joan (1987). ‘Underlying voicing recoverability of finally devoiced obstruents in Catalan’. Journal of phonetics 15.2, pp. 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsui, Mayuki (2015). ‘Roshiago ni okeru yuuseisei no tairitsu to tairitsu no jakka: Onkyo to chikaku. [Voicing contrast and contrast reduction in Russian: Acoustics and perception]’. PhD diss. Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
McArdle, John J. and Nesselroade, John R. (2003). ‘Growth curve analysis in contemporary psychological research’. Handbook of psychology, pp. 447–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1986). ‘OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination’. Linguistic inquiry 17.2, pp. 207–263.Google Scholar
McCollum, Adam G. (2019). ‘Gradient morphophonology: Evidence from Uyghur vowel harmony*’. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting on Phonology (AMP) 2018, San Diego, CA, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCollum, Adam G., Durvasula, K., and Abudushalamu, X. (2023). ‘Is harmony in Uyghur really gradient?’ Annual Meeting on Phonology 2023.Google Scholar
McCollum, Adam G., Durvasula, K., and Abudushalamu, X. (1977). ‘Tones and tone sandhi in 16th century Mandarin’. Journal of Chinese linguistics, pp. 237–260.Google Scholar
Milner, Brenda (1970). ‘Memory and the medial temporal regions of the brain’. Biology of memory 23, pp. 31–59.Google Scholar
Milroy, James (2001). ‘Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization’. Journal of sociolinguistics 5.4, pp. 530–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirman, Daniel (2017). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. CRC press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Mirman, Dixon, James A., and Magnuson, James S. (2008). ‘Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences’. Journal of memory and language 59.4, pp. 475–494.Google Scholar
Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveettil (1986). The theory of lexical phonology. Vol. 6. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Mori, Yoko (2002). ‘Lengthening of Japanese monomoraic nouns’. Journal of phonetics 30.4, pp. 689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, James and Tsay, Jane (2008). ‘Neutralization in Taiwan Southern Min tone sandhi’. Interfaces in Chinese phonology: Festschrift in honor of Matthew Y. Chen on his 70th Birthday, pp. 47–78.Google Scholar
Nelson, Scott and Heinz, Jeffrey (2021). Incomplete neutralization and the blueprint model of production. Ed. by Hout, Katherine, Mai, Anna, McCollum, Adam, Rose, Sharon, and Zaslansky, Matthew.Google Scholar
Bruno, Nicenboim, Roettger, Timo B., and Vasishth, Shravan (2018). ‘Using metaanalysis for evidence synthesis: The case of incomplete neutralization in German’. Journal of phonetics 70, pp. 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.06.001.Google Scholar
Nixon, Jessie S. and Tomaschek, Fabian (2023). ‘Does speech comprehension require phonemes?’ The handbook of usage-based linguistics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chap. 9, pp. 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119839859.ch9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Dennis and McQueen, James M. (2008). ‘Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition’. Psychological review 115.2, pp. 357–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oganian, Yulia, Bhaya-Grossman, Ilina, Johnson, Keith, and Chang, Edward F (2023). ‘Vowel and formant representation in the human auditory speech cortex’. Neuron 111.13, pp. 2105–2118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sejin, Oh, Shaw, Jason A., Durvasula, Karthik, and Kochotov, Alexei (2023). ‘Russian assimilatory palatalization is incomplete neutralization’. Laboratory Phonology 15.1, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Öhman, Sven (2000). ‘Expression and content in linguistic theory’. In The practice of language. Springer, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
Payne, Elinor M. (2005). ‘Phonetic variation in Italian consonant gemination’. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35.2, pp. 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shu-Hui (2000). ‘Lexical versus “phonological” representations of Mandarin Sandhi tones’. Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon. Ed. by Broe, Michael B. and Pierrehumbert, Janet B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–167.Google Scholar
Piantadosi, Steven (2023). Modern language models refute Chomsky’s approach to language. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/007180.Google Scholar
Janet, Pierrehumbert, Beckman, Mary E., and Robert Ladd, D. (2000). ‘Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science’. Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, pp. 273–304.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2001). ‘Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained’. Language and cognitive processes 16.5–6, pp. 691–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2002). ‘Word-specific phonetics’. In Laboratory phonology 7. Ed. by Gussenhoven, Carlos and Warner, Natasha. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 101–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2016). ‘Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic’. Annual review of linguistics 2.1, pp. 33–52. https://doi.org.10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F. (2007). ‘The graphical basis of phones and phonemes’. In Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege. Ed by Ocke-Schwen Bohn and Munro, Murray. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F. and Leary, A. P. (2005). ‘Against formal phonology’. Journal of language 81.4, pp. 927–964. https://doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F. and O’Dell, Michael L. (1985). ‘Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German’. Journal of phonetics 13.4, pp. 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30797-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poser, William J. (1990). ‘Evidence for foot structure in Japanese’. Language 66.1, pp. 78–105. https://doi.org.10.1353/lan.1990.0031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan and Smolensky, Paul (1993/2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. (1951). ‘Two dogmas of empiricism’. Philosophical review 60.1, pp. 20–43. https://doi.org.10.2307/2266637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Charles and Volenec, Veno (2022). ‘Conquer primal fear: Phonological features are innate and substance-free’. Canadian journal of linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 67.4, pp. 581–610. https://doi.org.10.1017/cnj.2022.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rialland, Annie. (1986). ‘Schwa et syllabes en francais’. In Studies in compensatory lengthening. Ed. by Wetzels, Leo and Sezer, Engin. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 186–226.Google Scholar
Roettger, T. B., Winter, B., Grawunder, S., Kirby, J., and Grice, M. (2014). ‘Assessing incomplete neutralization of final devoicing in German’. Journal of phonetics 43, pp. 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundus, Dewey (1971). ‘Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall’. Journal of experimental psychology 89.1, p. 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth (1986). ‘The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology’. PhD diss. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic I chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel (2006). A critical introduction to phonology: Of sound, mind, and body. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel (2012). ‘Mikołaj kruszewski: Theory and vision (part one)†’. Language and linguistics compass 6.6, pp. 330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjerps, Matthias J., Fox, Neal P., Johnson, Keith, and Chang, Edward F. (2019). ‘Speaker-normalized sound representations in the human auditory cortex’. Nature communications 10.1, p. 2465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. and Dinnsen, Daniel A. (1985). ‘On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing’. Journal of phonetics 13.3, pp. 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. and Szymanska, Helena J. (1989). ‘Perception of word-final devoicing in Polish’. Journal of phonetics 17.3, pp. 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1987). ‘Redundant values’. CLS 23: Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Part Two: Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Ed. by Need, Barbara, Bosch, Anna, and Schiller, Eric. Vol. 23.2. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 339–362.Google Scholar
Tanner, James, Sonderegger, Morgan, and Wagner, Michael (2017). ‘Production planning and coronal stop deletion in spontaneous speech’. Laboratory phonology: Journal of the association for laboratory phonology 8.1, p. 15. http://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traunmüller, Hartmut (1990). ‘Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale’. The journal of the acoustical society of America 88.1, pp. 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai Sergeevich (1969). Principles of phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Benjamin V. and Warner, Natasha (2010). ‘What it means to be phonetic or phonological: The case of Romanian devoiced nasals’. Phonology 27.2, pp. 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valian, Virginia (1982). ‘Psycholinguistic experiment and linguistic intuition’. In Language, mind, and brain. Ed. by Simon, Thomas W. and Scholes, Robert J.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 179–188.Google Scholar
Vallar, Giuseppe and Shallice, Tim, eds (1990). ‘Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory’. In Chapters based on papers presented at a conference held in Villa Olmo, Como, Italy, Sep 14–16, 1987. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, Van, Marc, (2008). ‘Incomplete devoicing in formal phonology’. Lingua 118.9, pp. 1362–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erik, Vandenbussche, Vogels, Rufin, and Orban, Guy A. (1986). ‘Human orientation discrimination: Changes with eccentricity in normal and amblyopic vision’. Investigative ophthalmology and visual science 27.2, pp. 237–245.Google Scholar
Volenec, Veno and Reiss, Charles (2017). ‘Cognitive phonetics: The transduction of distinctive features at the phonology-phonetics interface’. Biolinguistics 11. www.biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/509.Google Scholar
Wagner, M. (2012). ‘Locality in phonology and production planning’. McGill working papers in linguistics 22.1, pp. 1–18. http://prosodylab.org/~chael/papers/wagner2012production.pdf.Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael (2002). ‘The role of prosody in laryngeal neutralization’. MIT working papers in linguistics 42, pp. 373–392.Google Scholar
Wang, Yifeng and Kang, Jian (1989). ‘Hanyu fangyan de fenqu [The geographic division of Chinese dialects]’. Fangyan [Dialect] 4, p. 19.Google Scholar
Wang, Yifeng and Kang, Jian (2012). ‘Huai’ an nanpian fangyan liangzizu lianxu biaodiao fenxi [An analysis of disyllabic tone sandhi in southern Huai’ an dialect]’. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering (Social Sciences) 8.3, pp. 357–359.Google Scholar
Wang, Yuedong (1998). ‘Mixed effects smoothing spline analysis of variance’. Journal of the royal statistical society: Series b (statistical methodology) 60.1, pp. 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Natasha, Jongman, Allard, Sereno, Joan, and Kemps, Rachèl (2004). ‘Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: Evidence from Dutch’. Journal of phonetics 32.2, pp. 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00032-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, Nancy C. and Norman, Donald A. (1965). ‘Primary memory’. Psychological review 72.2, p. 89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, Ernst Heinrich (1905). Tastsinn und gemeingefühl. Leipzig, Germany: Verlag von Wilhelm Englemann.Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley, Averick, Mara, Bryan, Jennifer, Chang, Winston, D’Agostino McGowan, Lucy, François, Romain, Grolemund, Garrett, Hayes, Alex, Henry, Lionel, Hester, Jim, et al. (2019). ‘Welcome to the Tidyverse’. Journal of open source software 4.43, p. 1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, David H. and Macready, William G. (1997). ‘No free lunch theorems for optimization’. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation 1.1, pp. 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, Nancy Helen (1969). ‘Prosody and phonology’. PhD diss. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard (2004). ‘Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation’. In Phonetic interpretation: Papers in laboratory phonology VI. Ed. by Local, J., Ogden, R., and Temple, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–87.Google Scholar
Xie, Xin, Florian Jaeger, T., and Kurumada, Chigusa (2023). ‘What we do (not) know about the mechanisms underlying adaptive speech perception: A computational framework and review’. Cortex 166, pp. 377–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Yi (1993). ‘Contextual tonal variation in Mandarin Chinese’. PhD diss. University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi (1997). ‘Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin’. Journal of phonetics 25.1, pp. 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Jilin (2015). Zhongguo zhongxiaoxue baikequanshu [Encyclopedia for elementary school and middle school students]. Harbin Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. (2007). ‘Understanding near mergers: The case of morphological tone in Cantonese’. Phonology 24.1, pp. 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellou, Georgia (2013). ‘Consonant harmony in Moroccan Arabic: Similarity and incomplete neutralization’. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133, pp. 3572. https://doi.org.10.1121/1.4806549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by