Element contents
Series: Elements in Shakespeare and Text
Shakespeare Broadcasts and the Question of Value
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 February 2025
Summary
This Element investigates the framing 'texts' of Shakespeare's works in live theatre broadcasts produced by the Royal Shakespeare Company. Despite growing engagement from scholars of digital Shakespeares with the phenomenon of broadcast theatre and the aesthetics of filmed productions, the paratexts which accompany the live-streams − live or pre-recorded features, including interviews and short films − have largely been ignored. The Element considers how RSC live broadcasts of rarely performed, often critically maligned works are mediated for contemporary audiences, focusing on The Two Gentlemen of Verona (2014), Titus Andronicus (2017), and The Merry Wives of Windsor (2018). It questions the role of the theatre institution as a powerful broker in the (re)negotiation of hierarchies of value within Shakespeare's canon. Individual sections also trace the longer genealogies of paratextual value-narratives in print, proposing that broadcast paratexts be understood as participating in a broader history of Shakespearean paratexts in print and performance.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Shakespeare and TextOnline ISBN: 9781009417990Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 06 March 2025
References
Aebischer, Pascale and Greenhalgh, Susanne, ‘Introduction: Shakespeare and the “Live” Theatre Broadcast Experience’, in Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience, eds. Aebischer, Greenhalgh and Osbourne, Laurie E. (London: Bloomsbury, 2017), 1–16.Google Scholar
Aebischer, Pascale, Shakespeare, Spectatorship, and the Technologies of Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhimie, Patricia, ‘Racist Humour and Shakespearean Comedy’, The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Race, ed. Ayanna Thompson, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
August, Hannah, ‘Text/Paratext’, in Shakespeare / Text, ed. Claire, M. L. Bourne (London: Bloomsbury, 2021), 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Martin, Live to your Local Cinema: The Remarkable Rise of Livecasting (London: Palgrave, 2014).Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan, ‘The RSC Complete Works Festival: An Introduction and Retrospective’, Shakespeare 3.2 (2007), 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate, Jonathan, and Rasmussen, Eric, eds. The RSC Shakespeare: The Complete Works, 2nd ed. (London: Bloomsbury, 2022).Google Scholar
Bennett, Susan, Performing Nostalgia: Shifting Shakespeare and the Contemporary Past (London: Routledge Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Brown, David Sterling, Shakespeare’s White Others (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess-Van Aken, , Barbara, , ‘Contexts of Fear: Edward Ravenscroft’s Adaptation of Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus’, Actes des Congres de la Societe Francaise Shakespeare 36 (2018), 1–14.Google Scholar
Caines, Michael, Shakespeare and the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Chambers, Colin, Inside the Royal Shakespeare Company: Creativity and the Institution (London: Taylor and Francis, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, David, ed. The Merry Wives of Windsor, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian, ‘Last Words: The Biographemes of Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Quarterly 65.4 (2014), 482–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Anthony B. ed. Troilus and Cressida, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
de Grazia, , Margareta, , Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity in the 1790 Apparatus (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grazia, , Margareta, , Shakespeare without a Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, John, The Comical Gallant: or, the Amours of Sir John Falstaffe. A Comedy, as it is Acted at the Theatre Royal in Drury-Lane. By his Majestie’s Servants. By Mr Dennis. To which is added, a large Account of the Taste in Poetry, and the Causes of the Degeneracy of It (London: A. Baldwin, 1702).Google Scholar
Dennis, John, An Essay on the Genius and Writings of Shakespear: With Some Letters of Criticism to the Spectator (London: Bernard Lintott, 1712).Google Scholar
Depledge, Emma, Shakespeare’s Rise to Cultural Prominence: Politics, Print and Alteration, 1642–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, Michael, The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Authorship, 1660–1769 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, Michael, ‘Bowdler and Britannia: Shakespeare and the National Libido’, Shakespeare Survey 46 (2007), 137–144.Google Scholar
Dobson, Michael, ‘Watching the Complete Works Festival: The RSC and Its Fans in 2006’, Shakespeare Bulletin 25.4 (Winter 2007), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, Michael and Watson, Nicola J., England’s Elizabeth: An Afterlife in Fame and Fantasy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Edwards, Philip, ed. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas, Shakespeare and the Book Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genette, Gérard, Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, trans. by Jane E. Lewin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen, Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (Berkley: University of California Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamm, Robert B., ‘Rowe’s “Shakespear” (1709) and the Tonson House Style’, College Literature 31.3 (2004), 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, Rebecca, ‘Live Broadcast of Benedict Cumberbatch’s Hamlet Watched by 225,000 People’, The Telegraph, 21 October 2015, www.telegraph.co.uk/theatre/what-to-see/benedict-cumberbatch-hamlet-live/ [accessed 3 March 2023].Google Scholar
Hawkins, Ella, Shakespeare in Elizabethan Costume: ‘Period Dress’ in Twenty-First Century Performance (London: Bloomsbury, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Peter, ‘Openings’, in Shakespeare and the Making of Theatre, eds. Hampton-Reeves, Stuart and Escolme, Bridget (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, Adam G., Selling Shakespeare: Biography, Bibliography and the Book Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, David, ‘Benedict Cumberbatch Hamlet Takes £3m at NT Live Box Office’, The Stage, 9 December 2015, www.thestage.co.uk/news/benedict-cumberbatch-hamlet-takes-3m-at-nt-live-box-office [accessed 3 March 2023].Google Scholar
Internet Movie Database, ‘William Shakespeare (1564–1616)’, www.imdb.com/name/nm0000636/ [accessed 15 July 2024].Google Scholar
Jarvis, Simon, Scholars and Gentlemen: Shakespearean Textual Criticism and Representations of Scholarly Labour, 1725–1765 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Samuel, ed. The Plays of William Shakespeare, 8 vols. (London: J. and R. Tonson et al., 1765).Google Scholar
Karim-Cooper, Farah, ed. Titus Andronicus: The State of Play (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirwan, Peter, ‘“You Have No Voice!”: Constructing Reputation through Contemporaries in the Shakespeare Biopic’, Shakespeare Bulletin 32.1 (Spring 2014), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirwan, Peter, ‘Not-Shakespeare and the Shakespearean Ghost’, in The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Performance, ed. Bulman, James C. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 87–103.Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter, ‘“Complete” Works: The Folio and All of Shakespeare’, The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s First Folio, ed. Emma Smith, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitzes, Adam H., ‘The Hazards of Expurgation: Adapting Measure for Measure to the Bowdler Family Shakespeare’, Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 13.2 (2013), 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitzes, Adam H., ‘John Dennis and the Shakespeare-Elizabeth Anecdote: The Comical Gallant and the Reception of The Merry Wives of Windsor’, Restoration and 18th Century Theatre Research 28.2 (Winter 2013), 45–70.Google Scholar
Laingbane, Gerard, An Account of the English Dramatick Poets, or, Some Observations and Remarks on the Lives and Writings of All Those That Have Publish’d either Comedies, Tragedies, Tragi-Comedies, Pastorals, Masques, Interludes, Farces or Opera’s in the English Tongue (Oxford: Printed by L. L. for George West and Henry Clements, 1691).Google Scholar
Loomba, Ania, Shakespeare, Race, and Colonialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Loughnane, Rory, ‘Shakespeare and the Idea of Early Authorship’, Early Shakespeare: 1588–1594, eds. Rory Loughnane, and J. Power, Andrew (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020), 21–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughnane, Rory and Power, Andrew J., eds. Early Shakespeare: 1588–1594 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Laurie, and Smith, Emma, ‘Theater, Revision, and The Merry Wives of Windsor’, Shakespeare Quarterly 72.3–4 (2022), 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLuskie, Kate, and Rumbold, Kate, Cultural Value in Twenty-First Century England: The Case of Shakespeare (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew, Shakespeare in Print: A History and Chronology of Shakespeare Publishing, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Theatre Live, King Lear, directed for the screen by Robin Lough, Donmar Warehouse Theatre, London, 3 February 2011.Google Scholar
Neville, Sarah, ed. The Merry Wives of Windsor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024).Google Scholar
Newman, Harry, ‘Paratexts and Canonical Thresholds’, Shakespeare 13.4 (2017), 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, Rachael, ‘Encountering Shakespeare Elsewhere: Digital Distribution, Audience Reception, and the Changing Value of Shakespeare in Performance’ (Doctoral Thesis, University of Roehampton, 2019).Google Scholar
Nicholls, John, ed. Illustrations of the Literary History of the Eighteenth Century, 8 vols. (London: Nichols, Son and Bentley, 1817–1858).Google Scholar
Olive, Sarah, Shakespeare Valued: Educational Policy and Pedagogy 1998–2009 (Bristol: Intellect, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford Cambridge and RSA (OCR), GCSE English Literature J352/22 Shakespeare (8 June 2022) www.ocr.org.uk/Images/685747-question-paper-shakespeare.pdf [accessed 5 July 2023].Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander, ed. The Works of Shakespear in Six Volumes, Collated and Corrected by Former Editions, by Mr Pope, 6 vols. (London: Jacob Tonson, 1725).Google Scholar
Preiss, Richard, Clowning and Authorship in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Eoin, ‘Canon: Framing Not-Shakespearean Performance’, in The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Contemporary Performance, eds. Kirwan, Peter and Prince, Kathyrn (London: Bloomsbury, 2021), 151–170.Google Scholar
Purcell, Stephen, Shakespeare and Audience in Practice (London: Ardem Bloomsbury, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravenscroft, Edward, Titus Andronicus, or, The Rape of Lavinia (London: J Hindmarsh, 1687).Google Scholar
Rowe, Nicholas, ed. The Works of Mr. William Shakespear, 6 vols. (London: Jacob Tonson, 1709).Google Scholar
Royal Shakespeare Company, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, directed by Simon Godwin, The Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 2014.Google Scholar
Royal Shakespeare Company, Titus Andronicus, directed by Blanche McIntyre, The Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 2017.Google Scholar
Royal Shakespeare Company, The Merry Wives of Windsor, directed by Fiona Laird, The Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 2018.Google Scholar
Royster, Francesca T., ‘White-Limed Walls: Whiteness and Gothic Extremism in Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus’, Shakespeare Quarterly 51.4 (2000), 432–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, directed for the screen by Robin Lough, Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 3 September 2014.Google Scholar
RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon, Othello, directed for the screen by Robin Lough, Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 25 August 2015.Google Scholar
RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon, Hamlet, directed for the screen by Robin Lough, Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 8 June 2016.Google Scholar
RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon, Titus Andronicus, directed for the screen by Matthew Woodward, Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 9 August 2017.Google Scholar
RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon, The Merry Wives of Windsor, directed for the screen by Dewi Humphreys, Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 12 September 2018.Google Scholar
Scheil, Katherine West, The Taste of the Town: Shakespearian Comedy and the Early Eighteenth Century Theater (London: Associated University Presses, 2003).Google Scholar
Schlueter, Kurt, ed. The Two Gentlemen of Verona (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Seary, Peter, Lewis Theobald and the Editing of Shakespeare (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Sharpe, Will, Shakespeare and Collaborative Writing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharrock, Beth, ‘Framing Shakespeare in New Digital Canons: Paratextual Conventions of RSC Live and NT Live’, Shakespeare Bulletin 40.2 (2022), 239–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William, A Most Pleasant and Excellent Conceited Comedie, of Syr John Falstaffe, and the Merrie Wives of Windsor (London: Arthur Johnson, 1602)Google Scholar
Sherbo, Arthur, ‘George Steevens’s 1785 Variorum “Shakespeare”’, Studies in Bibliography, 32 (1979), 241–246.Google Scholar
Sherlock, Peter. ‘Arundell, Henry, Third Baron Arundell of Wardour (bap. 1608, d. 1694), Royalist Army Officer and Politician’. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. 21. Oxford University Press. [Accessed 13 May 2023] www.oxforddnb.com/view/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-716.Google Scholar
Spencer, Hazelton, Shakespeare Improved: The Restoration Versions in Quarto and on the Stage (New York: Frederick Ungar, 1927), 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steichen, James, ‘HD Opera: A Love/Hate Story’, Opera Quarterly 27.4 (2011), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Tiffany, Documents of Performance in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Erin, ‘The Audience is Present: Aliveness, Social Media, and the Theatre Broadcast Experience’, in Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience, eds. Pascale Aebischer, , Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie E. (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Erin, Shakespeare and Digital Performance in Practice (London: Palgrave, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Gary, Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present (London: Hogarth Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary, and Loughnane, Rory, ‘The Canon and Chronology’, in The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion, eds. Taylor, Gary and Egan, Gabriel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 417–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Ayanna Tene, Depicting Race and Torture on the Early Modern Stage (Doctoral Thesis, Harvard University, 2001).Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus, Shakespeare, Milton, and Eighteenth-Century Literary Editing: The Beginnings of Interpretive Scholarship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus, ‘George Steevens and the 1778 Variorum: A Hermeneutics and a Social Economy of Annotation’, in Shakespeare and the Eighteenth Century, eds. Sabor, Peter and Yachnin, Paul (Hampshire: Ashgate, 2008), 71–83.Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus, ‘Editing and Publishing Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century, eds. Ritchie, Fiona and Sabor, Peter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warburton, William, ed. The Works of Shakespear, 8. vols. (London: J. and P. Knapton, 1747).Google Scholar
Warren, Roger, ed. The Two Gentlemen of Verona (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Watson, Carly, ‘From Restorer to Editor: The Evolution of Lewis Theobald’s Textual Critical Practice’, The Library 20.2 (2019), 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, Geoffrey, ‘Together, Apart: Liveness, Eventness, and Streaming Shakesperean Performance’, Shakespeare Bulletin 35.3 (2017), 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Stanley, ‘The Failure of the Two Gentlemen of Verona’, Shakespeare Jarbuch 99 (1963), 161–173.Google Scholar
Whipday, Emma, ‘“The Picture of a Woman”: Roaring Girls and Alternative Histories in the RSC 2014 Season’, Shakespeare 11.3 (2015), 272–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyver, John, ‘Screening the RSC Stage: The 2014 Live from Stratford-upon-Avon Cinema Broadcasts’, Shakespeare 11.3 (2015), 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyver, John, Screening the Royal Shakespeare Company: A Critical History (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarn, Molly, Shakespeare’s ‘Lady Editors’: A New History of the Shakespearean Text (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).Google Scholar