Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:59:38.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Metaphysics

Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2021

Heather Dyke
Heather Dyke
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand

Summary

Philosophical thinking about time is characterised by tensions between competing conceptions. Different sources of evidence yield different conclusions about it. Common sense suggests there is an objective present, and that time is dynamic. Science recognises neither feature. This Element examines McTaggart's argument for the unreality of time, which epitomises this tension, showing how it gave rise to the A-theory/B-theory debate. Each theory is in tension with either ordinary or scientific thinking, so must accommodate the competing conception. Reconciling the A-theory with science does not look promising. Prospects look better for the B-theory's attempt to accommodate ordinary thinking about time.
Get access

Keywords

timetenseMcTaggartA-theoryB-theory
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Metaphysics
Online ISBN: 9781108935517
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 23 December 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arstila, V., Bardon, A., Power, S. E. & Vatakis, A. eds. (2019). The Illusions of Time: Philosophical and Psychological Essays on Timing and Time Perception. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Augustine. (1953). Confessions. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Bardon, A. (2013). A Brief History of the Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bigelow, J. (1996). Presentism and properties. In Tomberlin, J. E. ed., Philosophical Perspectives, 10, Metaphysics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
Boccardi, E. (2015). If it ain’t moving it shall not be moved. Topoi, 34, 171–85.Google Scholar
Bourne, C. (2006). A Future for Presentism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1923). Scientific Thought, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1938). An Examination of McTaggart’s Philosophy, vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brogaard, B. & Gatzia, D. E. (2015). Time and time perception. Topoi, 34, 257–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, J. (1984). Seeing the present. Mind, 93(370), 161–76.Google Scholar
Callender, C. (2000). Shedding light on time. Philosophy of Science, 67, S587–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, C. (2008). The common now. Philosophical Issues, 18(1), 339–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, C. (2011). Time’s ontic voltage. In Bardon, A., ed., The Future of the Philosophy of Time. Routledge, pp. 73–94.Google Scholar
Callender, C. (2017). What Makes Time Special? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. P. (2015). The Moving Spotlight: An Essay on Time and Topology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Castañeda, H.-N. (1967). Indicators and quasi-indicators. American Philosophical Quarterly, 4, 85–100.Google Scholar
Christensen, F. (1974). McTaggart’s paradox and the nature of time. Philosophical Quarterly, 24, 289–99.Google Scholar
Conee, E. & Sider, T. (2014). Riddles of Existence: A Guided Tour of Metaphysics: New Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Correia, F. & Rosenkranz, S. (2018). Nothing to Come: A Defence of the Growing Block Theory of Time. Synthese Library: Springer.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. (1998). McTaggart’s paradox and the problem of temporary intrinsics. Analysis, 58, 122–27.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. (2000). The Tensed Theory of Time: A Critical Examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, T. (2003). Presentism. In Loux, M. J. & Zimmerman, D. W., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 211–45.Google Scholar
Crisp, T. (2004). On presentism and triviality. In Zimmerman, D., ed., Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, T. (2005). Review of The Ontology of Time, by Oaklander, L. Nathan (New York: Prometheus Books, 2004). Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/the-ontology-of-time/Google Scholar
Crisp, T. (2007). Presentism and the grounding objection. Noûs, 41(1), 90–109.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2002). Talking about time. In Ridderbos, K., ed., Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–25.Google Scholar
Dainton, B. (2013). The perception of time. In Dyke, H. & Bardon, A., eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 389–409.Google Scholar
Dieks, D. (2006). Becoming, relativity and locality. In Dieks, D., ed., The Ontology of Spacetime. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 157–76.Google Scholar
Deng, N. (2013a). Fine’s McTaggart, temporal passage, and the A versus B-debate. Ratio, 26, 19–34.Google Scholar
Deng, N. (2013b). Our experience of passage on the B-theory. Erkenntnis, 78, 713–26.Google Scholar
Deng, N. (2013c). On explaining why time seems to pass. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 51(3), 367–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, N. (2017). Temporal experience and the A versus B debate. In Phillips, I., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience. New York: Routledge, pp. 239–48.Google Scholar
Dorato, M. (2006a). The irrelevance of the presentist/eternalist debate for the ontology of Minkowski spacetime. In Dieks, D., ed., The Ontology of Spacetime. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 93–109.Google Scholar
Dorato, M. (2006b). Absolute becoming, relational becoming and the arrow of time: Some non-conventional remarks on the relationship between physics and metaphysics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37, 559–76.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1960). A defence of McTaggart’s proof of the unreality of time. Philosophical Review, 69, 497–504.Google Scholar
Dyke, H. (2001). The pervasive paradox of tense. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 62, 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyke, H. (2002). McTaggart and the truth about time. In Callender, C., ed., Time, Reality and Experience. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 137–52.Google Scholar
Dyke, H. (2008). Metaphysics and the Representational Fallacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dyke, H. (2011). On methodology in the metaphysics of time. In Bardon, A., ed., The Future of the Philosophy of Time. New York: Routledge, pp. 169–87.Google Scholar
Dyke, H. (2013). Time and tense. In Dyke, H. & Bardon, A., eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 328–44.Google Scholar
Dyke, H. (2021a). Weak neo-Whorfianism and the philosophy of time. Mind & Language, https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyke, H. (2021b). Review of K. A. Taylor, Meaning Diminished: Toward Metaphysically Modest Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. Philosophical Review, 130(3), 459–63.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (2008). Reassessing the prospects for a growing block model of the universe. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22, 135–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1928). The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falk, A. (2003). Time plus the whoosh and whiz. In Jokić, A. & Smith, Q. eds., Time, Tense and Reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 211–50.Google Scholar
Falvey, K. (2010). The view from nowhen: The McTaggart-Dummett argument for the unreality of time. Philosophia, 38, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, M. (2020a). C-theories of time: On the adirectionality of time. Philosophy Compass, 12, 1–17.Google Scholar
Farr, M. (2020b). Explaining temporal qualia. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 10(8), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-019-0264-6Google Scholar
Fernández, J. (2013). Memory. In Dyke, H. & Bardon, A., eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 432–43.Google Scholar
Fine, K. (2005). Tense and reality. In Fine, K., ed., Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 261–320.Google Scholar
Fine, K. (2006). The reality of tense. Synthese, 150(3), 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, G. A. (2015). Accounting for experiences as of passage: Why topology isn’t enough. Topoi, 34, 187–95.Google Scholar
Forbes, G. A. (2016). The growing block’s past problems. Philosophical Studies, 173, 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, P. (2004). The real but dead past: A reply to Braddon-Mitchell. Analysis, 64, 358–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frischhut, A. M. (2015). What experience cannot teach us about time. Topoi, 34, 143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, R. M. (1968). The Language of Time. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gibson, I. & Pooley, O. (2008). Relativistic persistence. Philosophical Perspectives (Metaphysics), 20, 157–98.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (2015). Naturalizing metaphysics with the help of cognitive science. In Bennett, K. & Zimmerman, D. W., eds., Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 9. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–213.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1951). The Structure of Appearance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, K. (2001). How Things Persist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heil, J. (2005). From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M. (1992). Things change. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52(3), 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hestevold, H. S. (1990). Passage and the presence of experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 50, 537–52.Google Scholar
Hinchliff, M. (1996). The puzzle of change. In Tomberlin, J. E. ed., Philosophical Perspectives 10, Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 119–36.Google Scholar
Hinchliff, M. (2000). A defense of presentism in a relativistic setting. Philosophy of Science, 67, S575–86.Google Scholar
Hoerl, C. (2014). Do we (seem to) perceive passage?. Philosophical Explorations, 17(2), 188–202.Google Scholar
Hoerl, C. & McCormack, T. (2019). Thinking in and about time: A dual systems perspective on temporal cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingthorsson, R. D. (2016). McTaggart’s Paradox. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ismael, J. (2011). Temporal experience. In Callender, C., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 460–82.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. (1998). From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In Almog, J., Perry, J. & Wettstein, H., Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 481–563.Google Scholar
Kriegel, U. (2015). Experiencing the present. Analysis, 75(3), 407–13.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laplane, L., Mantovani, P., Adolphs, R., et al. (2019). Why science needs philosophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 3948–52.Google Scholar
Latham, A. J., Miller, K. & Norton, J. (2020a). Do the folk represent time as essentially dynamical?. Inquiry, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1827027Google Scholar
Latham, A. J., Miller, K. & Norton, J. (2020b). An empirical investigation of purported passage phenomenology. The Journal of Philosophy, 117, 353–86.Google Scholar
Latham, A. J., Miller, K. & Norton, J. (2021). Is our naïve theory of time dynamical?. Synthese, 198, 4251–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leininger, L. (2014). On Mellor and the future direction of time. Analysis, 74(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Leininger, L. (2021). Temporal B-coming: Passage without presentness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 99, 130–47 https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2020.1744673Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, R. D. (1991). Change, Cause and Contradiction: A Defence of the Tenseless Theory of Time. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, R. D. (2007). The Images of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, S.-J. (2013). Essence and natural kinds. In Gendler, T. & Hawthorne, J., eds., Oxford Studies in Epistemology, vol. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–66.Google Scholar
Lipman, M. (2015). On Fine’s fragmentalism. Philosophical Studies, 172, 3119–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0460-yGoogle Scholar
Lombard, L. (1999). On the alleged incompatibility of presentism and temporal parts. Philosophia, 27, 253–60.Google Scholar
Lucas, J. R. (1973). A Treatise on Time and Space. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ludlow, P. (1999). Semantics, Tense, and Time: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacBeath, M. (1986). Clipping time’s wings, Mind, 95, 233–37.Google Scholar
Maclaurin, J. & Dyke, H. (2002). ‘Thank goodness that’s over’: The evolutionary story. Ratio, 15, 276–92.Google Scholar
Markosian, N. (2004). A defense of presentism. In Zimmerman, D. W., ed., Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 47–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1908). The Unreality of Time, Mind, 17, 457–73.Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1927). The Nature of Existence, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mellor, D. H. (1981). Real Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mellor, D. H. (1998). Real Time II. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mellor, D. H. (2013). Mind, Meaning, and Reality: Essays in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, U. (2005). The presentist’s dilemma. Philosophical Studies, 122(3), 213–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. (2013). Presentism, eternalism, and the growing block. In Dyke, H. & Bardon, A., eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 345–64.Google Scholar
Miller, K. & Norton, J. (2021). If time can pass, time can pass at different rates. Analytic Philosophy, 62(1), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monton, B. (2010). McTaggart and modern physics. Philosophia, 38, 257–64.Google Scholar
Mozersky, M. J. (2013). The B-theory in the twentieth century. In Dyke, H. and Bardon, A., eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 167–82.Google Scholar
Mozersky, M. J. (2015). Time, Language and Ontology: The World from the B-theoretic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (1989). The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, J. D. (2010). Time really passes. Humana. Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 4(13), 23–34.Google Scholar
Oaklander, L. N. (1984). Temporal Relations and Temporal Becoming: A Defense of a Russellian Theory of Time. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Oaklander, L. N. (2004). The Ontology of Time. New York: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Oaklander, L. N. (2010). McTaggart’s paradox and Crisp’s presentism. Philosophia, 38, 229–41.Google Scholar
Oaklander, L. N. (2012). A-, B-, and R-theories of time: A debate. In Bardon, A., ed. The Future of the Philosophy of Time. London: Routledge, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Olson, E. T. (2009). The rate of time’s passage. Analysis, 69(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, L. A. (2010). Temporal experience. The Journal of Philosophy, 107(7), 333–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, J. (1979). The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs, 13, 3–21.Google Scholar
Phillips, I. (2009). Rate abuse: A reply to Olson. Analysis, 69(3), 503–05.Google Scholar
Pooley, O. (2013). Relativity, the open future, and the passage of time. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 113(3), 321–63.Google Scholar
Power, S. E. (2018). Philosophy of Time and Perceptual Experience. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. (1996). Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, H. (2011). The flow of time. In Callender, C., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 276–311.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1959). Thank goodness that’s over. Philosophy, 34(128), 12–17.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1968). Changes in events and changes in things. In Prior, A. N., ed., Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1970). The notion of the present. Studium Generale, 23, 245–48.Google Scholar
Prosser, S. (2007). Could we experience the passage of time? Ratio, 20, 75–90.Google Scholar
Prosser, S. (2013). Passage and perception. Noûs, 47(1), 69–84Google Scholar
Prosser, S. (2016). Experiencing Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1967). Time and physical geometry. The Journal of Philosophy, 64(8), 240–47.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of meaning. In Putnam, H., ed., Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rea, M. C. (2003). Four-dimensionalism. In Loux, M. J. & Zimmerman, D. W., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 246–80.Google Scholar
Raven, M. (2011). Can time pass at the rate of 1 second per second? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89(3), 459–65.Google Scholar
Rietdijk, C. W. (1966). A rigorous proof of determinism derived from the special theory of relativity. Philosophy of Science, 33(4), 341–44.Google Scholar
Riggs, P. J. (2017). The perceptions and experience of the ‘passage’ of time. The Philosophical Forum, 48(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
Rovelli, C. (2018). Physics needs philosophy. Philosophy needs physics. Foundations of Physics, 48, 481–91.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1915). On the experience of time. The Monist, 25(2), 212–33.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1938). Principles of Mathematics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1954). It was to be. In Ryle, G., ed., Dilemmas: The Tanner Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–35.Google Scholar
Saunders, S. (2002). How relativity contradicts presentism. In Callender, C., ed., Time, Reality and Experience. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 277–92.Google Scholar
Savitt, S. (2002). On absolute becoming and the myth of passage. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 50, 153–67.Google Scholar
Savitt, S. (2006). Presentism and eternalism in perspective. In Dieks, D., ed., The Ontology of Spacetime. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 111–27.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, G. N. (1982). How time flies. Mind, 91, 501–23.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, G. N. (1991). E pur si muove. The Philosophical Quarterly, 41(165), 427–41.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, G. N. (1994). Timely Topics. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, M. M. (1986). Is the flow of time subjective? The Review of Metaphysics, 39(4), 695–714.Google Scholar
Shardlow, J., Lee, R., Hoerl, C. et al., (2021). Exploring people’s beliefs about the experience of time. Synthese, 198, 10709–31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02749-2Google Scholar
Sider, T. (1999). Presentism and ontological commitment. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(7), 325–47.Google Scholar
Sider, T. (2001). Four-dimensionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sider, T. (2006). Quantifiers and temporal ontology. Mind, 115(457), 75–97.Google Scholar
Sinha, C. & Gärdenfors, P. (2014). Time, space, and events in language and cognition: a comparative view. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Issue: Flow of Time, 40, 1–10.Google Scholar
Skow, B. (2011a). On the meaning of the question ‘how fast does time pass? Philosophical Studies, 155, 325–44.Google Scholar
Skow, B. (2011b). Experience and the passage of time. Philosophical Perspectives, 25(1), 359–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skow, B. (2015). Objective Becoming. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (1949). The river of time. Mind, 58(232), 483–94.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (1963). Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (1980). Time and becoming. In van Inwagen, P., ed., Time and Cause. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Smith, N. J. J. (2011). Inconsistency in the A-theory. Philosophical Studies, 156, 231–47.Google Scholar
Smith, Q. (1993). Language and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Q. (1994). The phenomenology of A-time. In Oaklander, L. N. & Smith, Q., eds., The New Theory of Time. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 351–59.Google Scholar
Sprigge, T. L. S. (1992). The unreality of time. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 92, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhler, C. & Callender, C. (2012). Thank goodness that argument is over: Explaining the temporal value asymmetry. Philosopher’s Imprint, 12(15), 1–16.Google Scholar
Tallant, J. (2010a). Time for presence? Philosophia, 38, 271–80.Google Scholar
Tallant, J. (2010b). Sketch of a presentist theory of passage, Erkenntnis, 73, 133–40.Google Scholar
Tallant, J. (2016). Temporal passage and the ‘no alternate possibilities’ argument, Manuscrito, 39(4), 35–47.Google Scholar
Taylor, K. (2019). Meaning Diminished: Toward Metaphysically Modest Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tooley, M. (1997). Time, Tense and Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Torre, S. (2010). Tense, timely action and self-ascription. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80(1), 112–32.Google Scholar
Torrengo, G. (2017). Feeling the passing of time. The Journal of Philosophy, 114(4), 165–88.Google Scholar
Torrengo, G. (2018). Perspectival tenses and dynamic tenses. Erkenntnis, 83, 1045–61.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1978). Descartes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Williams, D. C. (1951). The myth of passage. The Journal of Philosophy, 48, 457–72.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. W. (2005). The A-theory of time, the B-theory of time and ‘taking tense seriously’. Dialectica, 59, 401–57.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. W. (2008). The privileged present: Defending an ‘A-theory’ of time. In Sider, T., Hawthorne, J. & Zimmerman, D., eds., Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 211–25.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Time
  • Heather Dyke, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Online ISBN: 9781108935517
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Time
  • Heather Dyke, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Online ISBN: 9781108935517
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Time
  • Heather Dyke, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Online ISBN: 9781108935517
Available formats
×