Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:08:31.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Descriptive diagnostic assessment of depression Categorical diagnosis, dimensional assessment, and instruments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

C.K.W. Schotte  and
M. Maes
C.K.W. Schotte*
Affiliation:
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Dienst Psychiatrie Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Psychologie en Opvoedkunde
M. Maes
Affiliation:
Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, Psychiatrie
*
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Dienst Psychiatrie, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, België, Tel (voice) 03/821 39 38; fax 03/825 16 41, E-mail: chris.schotte@uza.uia.ac.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The descriptive diagnostics constitute the first step, the base and the prerequisite for the psychodiagnostic process and the treatment of depression. Within the descriptive diagnostics, two approaches are distinguished, namely (1) the differentiation between dimensional and categorical levels of measurement and (2) the consideration of the influence of the applied method: questionnaire versus interview. Departing from these approaches, a review of the most widely used instruments on depression is given, with a focus on the reliability and validity of the dimensional depression instruments, based on the findings of our research group. The importance of the differentiation between dimensional and categorical levels of measurement can also be recognised within the discussion on quantitative/dimensional versus qualitative/categorical taxonomic views on depression. The Integrated Threshold Model, which integrates both the quantitative and the qualitative view on the classification of depressive disorders, is considered. By way of conclusion, a diagnostic multi level/modality/method strategy is discussed and a specific test battery, which can be particularly useful within a research context, is presented.

Type
Articles
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 2 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literatuur

1.Schotte, CKW. Maes, M. Cluydts, R. De Donckcr, D. Cosyns, P. Construct validity of the Beck Depression Inventory in a depressive population. J Affect Disord 1997:46:115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Schotte, C. Doscriptiovc diagnostiek van unipolair doprcssiovo stoornissen. Doctoraatsthesis. Vrije Universiteit Brüssel. 1996.Google Scholar
3.Gibbons, RD. Clark, DC. Kupfer, DJ. Exactly what does the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale measure? J Psychiatr Res 1993:27:259–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Kendall, PC. Holion, SD. Beck, AT. Hammen, CL. Ingram, RE. Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory. Cognitive Ther Res 1987:11:289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Wetzler, S. Katz, MM. Problems with the differentiation of anxiety and depression. J Psychiatr Res 1989:23:1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Wetzler, S. van Praag, MM. Katz, MMDiagnosing depression: a two-tier approach. In: Feighner, JP. Boyer, WF (eds.). Diagnosis of Depression. Chichester. Wiley & Sons. 1991. pp 65–78.Google Scholar
7.Rush, AJ. Weissenburger, JE. Melancholic svmptom features and DSM-IV. Am J Psychiatry 1994:151:489–498.Google ScholarPubMed
8.DSM-IV. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4rth ed.). Washington. DC. American Psychiatric Association. 1994.Google Scholar
9.ICD-10. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva. World Health Organisation. 1993.Google Scholar
10.Judd, LL. Kunovac, JL. Diagnosis and classification of depression. In: Honig, A. Van Praag, HM (eds.). Depression: Ncurobiological. Psychopathological and Therapeutical Advances. Chichester. Wilev & Sons. 1997.Google Scholar
11.Bouman, TK. Assessment van stemmingsstoornisson. In: Albersnagel, FA. Emmelkamp, PMG. van den Hoofdakkor, RH (eds.). Depressie. Theorie. Diagnostick on Behandelm. Deventor. Van Louhum Slaterus. 1989. pp 43–66.Google Scholar
12.Beck, AT. Ward, CH. Mendelson, M. Mock, J. Erbaugh, J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961:4:53–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Bouman, TK. The measurement of depression with questionnaires. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Groningen. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 1987.Google Scholar
14.Dobson, KS. The relationship between anxiety and depression. Clin Psychol Rev 1985:5:307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Paykel, ES. Norton, KRW. Self-report and clinical interview in the assessment of depression. In: Sartorius, N. Ban, TA (eds.). Assessment of Depression. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag. 1986. pp 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Steer, RA. Beck, AT. Riskind, JH. Brown, G. Relationships between the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hamilton Psychiatric Ratine Scale for Depression in depressed outpatients. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 1987:9:327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Endicott, J. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizofrenia. Regular and Change versions: measure of depression. In: Sartorius, N. Ban, TA (eds.). Assessment of Depression Heidelberg, Springer-Verlan. 1986.Google Scholar
18.First, M. Spitzer, RL. Gibbon, M. Williams, JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM-IV Disorders. Washington DC.American Psychiatric Press. 1995.Google Scholar
19.World Health Organisation. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN). Geneva. World Health Oruanisation. 1992.Google Scholar
20.Wing, JK. Cooper, JE. Sartorius, N. The measurement and classification of pyschiatric symptoms: an instruction manual for the PES and Catego system. Cambridge. University Press. 1974.Google Scholar
21.Robins, L. Reuier, DA. Psychiatric disorders in America. Now York. Free Press. 1991.Google Scholar
22.World Health Organisation. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Geneva. World Health Organisation. 1990.Google Scholar
23.Sheehan, DVet al.The Mini-International Neuropsychiatry Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and Validation of a Structured Diagnostic psychiatric Interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998:59 (suppl 20):22–33.Google Scholar
24.Zimmerman, M.Coryell, W. Corenthal, C.Wilson, S. A self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986:43:1076–1081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Depue, RA. Klein, D. Identification of unipolar and bipolar conditions by the General Behavior Inventory. In: Dunnner, D. Gerhson, E. Barret, J (eds.). Relatives at Risk for Mental Disorder. Now York. NY. Raven Press. 1988. 1257–1282.Google Scholar
26.Janca, A., Üstün, TB. Sartorius, N. Now versions of World Health Organisation instruments for the assessment of mental disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994:90:73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Booth, BM: Kirchner, JE. Hamilton, G. Harrel, R. Smith, GR. Diagnosing depression in the medically ill: validity of a lay-administered structured diagnostic interview. J Psychiatr Res 1998:32:353–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Uehara, T. Sato, T. Sakado, K. Sato, S. Reliability of the Japanese version of the Inventory to Diagnose Depression. Psychiatr Clin Nou-rosci 1996:50:235–238.Google ScholarPubMed
29.Uehara, T, Sato, T. Sakado, K. Kameda, K. Discriminant validity of the Inventory to Diagnose Depression between patients with major depression and pure anxiety disorders. Psychiatr Res 1997;71:57–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Sakado, K. Sato, T. Uehara, T. Sato, S. Kameda, K. Discriminant validity of the inventory to diamiose depression, lifetime version. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996:93:257–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Jeuken, JMG. Inventory to Diagnose Depression. Nederlandstalige bewcrking. Nijmegon. Canisius-Wilhemina Ziekenhuis. 1990.Google Scholar
32.Depue, RA. Krauss, S. Spoont, MR. Arbisi, P. General Behavior Inventory identification of unipolar and bipolar affective conditions in a nonclinical university population. J Abnorm Psychol 1989:98:117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Ncurosurg Psychiatry 1960:23:56–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Montgomery, S. Asberg, M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979:134:382–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Beck, AT. Steer, RA. Brown, GK. Manual for Beck Depression In-vcntory-II. San Antonio.TX. Psychological Corporation. 1996.Google Scholar
36.Zung, WWK. From art to science. Thc diagnosis and treatment of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1973:29:328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Radioff, LS. The CES-D Scale: A new self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977:1:385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Bookman, ATF. Limbeek, J v.. Decg, DJH. Wouters, L. Tilburg, W van. Screening for depression in the elderly in the community: using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) in the Netherlands. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 1994.25:95–103.Google Scholar
39.Von Zerssen, D. Clinical Self-Rating Scales (CSRS) of the Munich Psychiatric Information system (PSYCHIS München). In: Sartorius, N. Ban, TA (eds.). Assessment of Depression. Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag. 1986. pp 270–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar