Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:43:59.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plough section control for optimised uniformity in primary tillage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

S.K. Nielsen ,
L.J. Munkholm ,
M.H. Aarestrup ,
M.H. Kristensen  and
O. Green
S.K. Nielsen*
Affiliation:
Agro Intelligence Aps, Agro Food Park 13, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark Aarhus University, Department of Agroecology, AU Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
L.J. Munkholm
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Department of Agroecology, AU Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
M.H. Aarestrup
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, Bygning 101A, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
M.H. Kristensen
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, Bygning 101A, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
O. Green
Affiliation:
Agro Intelligence Aps, Agro Food Park 13, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
*
†E-mail: skn@AgroIntelli.com
Get access

Abstract

Primary tillage is in many cases crucial for successful crop establishment and weed and pest control. Inversion tillage using a mouldboard plough may be required when a uniform ploughing operation covering the entire field is preferred. The ploughing operation is especially challenging at the interface area between headlands and the main cropping area. Overlapping at the interface causes a mixing of the topsoil, rather than a soil inversion, and poor burial of residues and weeds, especially of concern in organic farming. The aim of the research was to study novel plough section control designs to optimise the interface area. Concept designs with hydraulic control were studied and the preferred was developed and tested in real field operations. The research concluded that the concept was functional and by visual inspection the interface was optimised. In addition, the section control can improve operations in irregularly shaped fields.

Keywords

Plough section controlnovel concept designproof-of-concept
Type
Tillage and Seeding
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 8 , Special Issue 2: Papers presented at the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA 2017), John McIntyre Centre, Edinburgh, UK, July 16–20 2017 , July 2017 , pp. 444 - 449
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y, Khalilian, A, Alimardani, R, Keyhani, A and Sadati, SH 2005. Energy Savings WITH Variable-Depth Tillage. Tillage Systems Conference, Clemson. pp. 84–91.Google Scholar
Bertocco, M, Basso, B, Sartori, L and Martin, EC 2008. Evaluating energy efficiency of site-specific tillage in maize in NE Italy. Bioresources Technology 99, 6957–6965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braunack, MV and Dexter, AR 1989. Soil aggregation in the seedbed: A review. I. Properties of aggregates and beds of aggregates. Soil Tillage Research 14, 259–279.Google Scholar
Godwin, RJ, O’Dogherty, MJ, Saunders, C and Balafoutis, AT 2007. A force prediction model for mouldboard ploughs incorporating the effects of soil characteristic properties, plough geometric factors and ploughing speed. Biosystems. Engineering 97, 117–129.Google Scholar
Guérif, J, Richard, G, Dürr, C, Machet, J, Recous, S and Roger-Estrade, J 2001. A review of tillage effects on crop residue management, seedbed conditions and seedling establishment. Soil Tillage Research 61, 13–32.Google Scholar
Hamza, MA and Anderson, WK 2005. Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil Tillage Research 82, 121–145.Google Scholar
Håkansson, I, Arvidsson, J, Keller, T and Rydberg, T 2011. Effects of seedbed properties on crop emergence: 1. Temporal effects of temperature and sowing depth in seedbeds with favourable properties. Acta Agriculturae Scandanavica, Section B-Soil and Plant Science 61 (5), 458–468.Google Scholar
Keskin, SG, Khalilian, A, Han, YJ and Dodd, RB 2011. Variable-depth Tillage based on Geo-referenced Soil Compaction Data in Coastal Plain Soils. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology 1 (2), 22–32.Google Scholar
Kuczewski, J 1981. Soil Parameters for Predicting the Draught of Model Plough Bodies. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 26 (3), 193–201.Google Scholar
Luck, JD, Zandonadi, RS, Luck, BD and Shearer, SA 2010. Reducing Pesticide Over-Application with Map-Based Automatic Boom Section Control on Agricultural Sprayers. Transactions of the ASABE 53, 685–690.Google Scholar
Mari, IA, Ji, C, Chandio, FA, Arslan, C, Sattar, A and Ahmad, F 2015. Spatial distribution of soil forces on moldboard plough and draft requirement operated in silty-clay paddy field soil. Journal of Terramechanics 60, 1–9.Google Scholar
Natsis, A, Papadakis, G and Pitsilis, J 1999. The Influence of Soil Type, Soil Water and Share Sharpness of a Mouldboard Plough on Energy Consumption, Rate of Work and Tillage Quality. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 72, 171–176.Google Scholar
Qiong, G, Pitt, RE and Ruina, A 1986. A model to predict soil forces on the plough mouldboard. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 35, 141–155.Google Scholar
Raper, RL, Reeves, DW, Shaw, JN, van Santen, E and Mask, PL 2005. Using Site-Specific Subsoiling to Minimize Draft and Optimize Corn Yields Transactions of the ASABE 48 (6), 2047–2052.Google Scholar
Shamal, SAM, Alhwaimel, SA and Mouazen, AM 2016. Application of an on-line sensor to map soil packing density for site specific cultivation. Soil Tillage Research 162, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilde, A 2008. The share-moldboard parameters of some plough bodies. Engineering for Rural Development. pp. 141–146.Google Scholar