Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:50:45.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of Linear Operator on the Convergence of HAM Solution: a Modified Operator Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

S. T. Hussain*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Spencer Engineering Building, N6A 5B9, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada Department of Mathematics, Quaid-I-Azam University 45320, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
S. Nadeem
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Quaid-I-Azam University 45320, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
M. Qasim
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Chak Shahzad, Islamabad, Pakistan
*
*Corresponding author. Email:sthqau@gmail.com (S. T. Hussain)
Get access

Abstract.

The linear operator plays an important role in the computational process of Homotopy Analysis Method (HAM). In HAM frame any kind of linear operator can be chosen to develop a solution. Hence, it is easy to introduce the modified/physical parameter dependent linear operators. The effective use of these operators has been judged through solving fluid flow problems. Modification in linear operators affects the solution and improves the computational efficiency of HAM for larger values of parameters. The convergence rate of the solution is rapid and several times higher resulting in lesser computational time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Liao, S., Beyond Perturbation: Introduction to the Homotopy Analysis Method, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2003, pp. 99102.Google Scholar
[2]Noor, N. F. M. and Hashim, I., Thermocapillarity and magnetic field effects in a thin liquid film on an unsteady stretching surface, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 53(9-10) (2010), pp. 20442051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Hayat, T. and Qasim, M., Influence of thermal radiation and Joule heating on MHD flow of a Maxwell fluid in the presence of thermophoresis, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 53(21-22) (2010), pp. 47804788.Google Scholar
[4]Qasim, M. and Noreen, S., Falkner-Skan flow of a Maxwell fluid with heat transfer and magnetic field, Int. J. Eng. Math., (2013), ID 692827.Google Scholar
[5]Nadeem, S. and Saleem, S., Unsteady mixed convection flow of a rotating second-grade fluid on a rotating cone, Heat Transf. Asian Res., (2013), DOI: 10.1002/htj.21072.Google Scholar
[6]Abbasbandy, S., Homotopy analysis method for heat radiation equations, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 34(3) (2007), pp. 380387.Google Scholar
[7]Alsaadi, F. E., Shehzad, S. A., Hayat, T. and Monaquel, S. J., Soret and dufour effects on the unsteady mixed convection flow over a stretching surface, J. Mech., 29(4) (2013), pp. 623632.Google Scholar
[8]Ellahi, R., Effects of the slip boundary condition on non-Newtonian flows in a channel, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 14(4) (2009), pp. 13771384.Google Scholar
[9]Nadeem, S. and Haq, R. U., Effect of thermal radiation for megnetohydrodynamic boundary layer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet with convective boundary conditions, J. Comput. Theoretical Nanosci., 11(1) (2014), pp. 3240.Google Scholar
[10]Nadeem, S. and Hussain, S. T., Flow and heat transfer analysis ofWilliamson nanofluid, Appl.Nanosci., (2013), DOI: 10.1007/s13204-013-0282-1.Google Scholar
[11]Abdulaziz, O., Noor, N. F. M. and Hashim, I., Homotopy analysis method for fully developed MHD micropolar fluid flow between vertical porous plates, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 78(7) (2009), pp. 817827.Google Scholar
[12]Marinca, V. and Herisanu, N., Application of optimal homotopy asymptotic method for solving nonlinear equations arising in heat transfer, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., (35) (2008), pp. 710715.Google Scholar
[13]Marinca, V., Herisanu, N. and Nemes, I., Optimal homotopy asymptotic method with application to thin film flow, Central Euro. J. Phys., (6) (2008), pp. 648653.Google Scholar
[14]Liao, S., An optimal homotopy-analysis approach for strongly nonlinear differential equations, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 15 (2010), pp. 20032016.Google Scholar
[15]Zhao, Y., Lin, Z. and Liao, S., A modified homotopy analysis method for solving boundary layer equations, Appl. Math., 4(1) (2013), pp. 1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Shehzad, S. A., Hayat, T. and Qasim, M., Effects of mass transfer on MHD flow of casson fluid with chemical reaction and suction, Brazilian J. Chemical Eng., 30(1) (2013), pp. 187195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Hayat, T., Qasim, M. and Mesloub, S., MHD flow and heat transfer over permeable stretching sheet with slip conditions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 66(8) (2011), pp. 963975.Google Scholar
[18]Nadeem, S. and Saleem, S., Analytical treatment of unsteady mixed convection MHD flow on a rotating cone in a rotating frame, J. Taiwan Institute Chemical Eng., 44(4) (2013), pp. 596604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Ellahi, R. and Riaz, A., Analytical solutions for MHD flow in a third-grade fluid with variable viscosity, Math. Comput. Model., 52(9-10) (2010), pp. 17831793.Google Scholar
[20]Xu, H. and Liao, S., Series solutions of unsteady magnetohydrodynamic flows of non-Newtonian fluids caused by an impulsively stretching plate, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 129 (2005), pp. 4655.Google Scholar
[21]Liao, S. and Campo, A., Analytic solutions of the temperature distribution in Blasius viscous flow problems, J. Fluid Mech., 453 (2002), pp. 411425.Google Scholar
[22]Liao, S., Homotopy Analysis Method in Nonlinear Differential Equations, Springer & Higher Education Press, Heidelberg, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Nadeem, S., Hussain, S. T. and Lee, C., Flow of a Williamson fluid over a stretching sheet, Brazilian J. Chem. Eng., 30(3) (2013), pp. 619625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Dapra, I. and Scarpi, G., Perturbation solution for pulsatile flow of a non-NewtonianWilliamson fluid in a rock fracture, Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci., 44 (2007), pp. 271278.Google Scholar
[25]Mastroberardino, A., Mixed convection in viscoelastic boundary layer flow and heat transfer over a stretching sheet, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 6 (2014), pp. 359375.Google Scholar
[26]Matinfar, M., Saeidy, M. and Vahidi, J., Application of homotopy analysis method for solving systems of volterra integral equations, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 4(1) (2012), pp. 3645.Google Scholar
[27]Fan, T. and You, X., Optimal homotopy analysis method for nonlinear differential equations in the boundary layer, Numer. Alg., 62(2) (2013), pp. 337354.Google Scholar
[28]Morrison, D. D., Riley, J. D. and Zancanaro, J. F., Multiple shooting method for two-point boundary value problems, Commun. ACM, 5 (1962), pp. 613614.Google Scholar
[29]Keller, H. B., Numerical solution of two point boundary value problems, Society Indus. Appl. Math., 24 (1976).Google Scholar
[30]Makinde, O. D., Khan, W. A. and Khan, Z. H., Buoyancy effects on MHD stagnation point flow and heat transfer of a nanofluid past a convectively heated stretching/shrinking sheet, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 62 (2013), pp. 526533Google Scholar
[31]Khan, W. A., Khan, Z. H. and Rahi, M., Fluid flow and heat transfer of carbon nanotubes along a flat plate with Navier slip boundary, Appl. Nanosci., (2013) DOI: 10.1007/s13204-013-0242-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32]Pavlov, K. B., Magnetohydrodynamic flow of an impressible viscous fluid caused by deformation of a surface, Magnitnaya Gidrodinamika, 4 (1974), pp. 146147.Google Scholar
[33]Liao, S., On the analytic solution of magnetohydrodynamic flows of non-Newtonian fluids over a stretching sheet, J. Fluid Mech., 488 (2003), pp. 189212.Google Scholar