Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:58:19.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asymptotic shape and the speed of propagation of continuous-time continuous-space birth processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2018

Viktor Bezborodov*
Affiliation:
University of Verona
Luca Di Persio*
Affiliation:
University of Verona
Tyll Krueger*
Affiliation:
University of Wrocław
Mykola Lebid*
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Tomasz Ożański*
Affiliation:
University of Wrocław
*
* Postal address: Department of Computer Science, The University of Verona, Strada le Grazie 15, Verona, 37134, Italy.
* Postal address: Department of Computer Science, The University of Verona, Strada le Grazie 15, Verona, 37134, Italy.
*** Postal address: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Wrocław University of Technology, Janiszewskiego 15, Wrocław, 50-372, Poland.
**** Postal address: Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, D-BSSE, Mattenstrasse 26, Basel, 4058, Switzerland.
*** Postal address: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Wrocław University of Technology, Janiszewskiego 15, Wrocław, 50-372, Poland.

Abstract

We formulate and prove a shape theorem for a continuous-time continuous-space stochastic growth model under certain general conditions. Similar to the classical lattice growth models, the proof makes use of the subadditive ergodic theorem. A precise expression for the speed of propagation is given in the case of a truncated free-branching birth rate.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Auffinger, A., Damron, M. and Hanson, J. (2017). 50 Years of First-Passage Percolation (University Lecture Series 68). American Mathematical Society. Google Scholar
[2] Bezborodov, V. (2015). Spatial birth-and-death Markov dynamics of finite particle systems. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.05804. Google Scholar
[3] Biggins, J. D. (1995). The growth and spread of the general branching random walk. Ann. Appl. Prob. 5, 10081024. Google Scholar
[4] Burke, C. J. and Rosenblatt, M. (1958). A Markovian function of a Markov chain. Ann. Math. Statist. 29, 11121122. Google Scholar
[5] Deijfen, M. (2003). Asymptotic shape in a continuum growth model. Adv. Appl. Prob. 35, 303318. Google Scholar
[6] Durrett, R. (1983). Maxima of branching random walks. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 62, 165170. Google Scholar
[7] Durrett, R. (1988). Lecture Notes on Particle Systems and Percolation. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA. Google Scholar
[8] Eden, M. (1961). A two-dimensional growth process. In Proc. 4th Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob., Vol. IV, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 223239. Google Scholar
[9] Eibeck, A. and Wagner, W. (2003). Stochastic interacting particle systems and nonlinear kinetic equations. Ann. Appl. Prob. 13, 845889. Google Scholar
[10] Fournier, N. and Méléard, S. (2004). A microscopic probabilistic description of a locally regulated population and macroscopic approximations. Ann. Appl. Prob. 14, 18801919. Google Scholar
[11] Garet, O. and Marchand, R. (2012). Asymptotic shape for the contact process in random environment. Ann. Appl. Prob. 22, 13621410. Google Scholar
[12] Gouéré, J.-B. and Marchand, R. (2008). Continuous first-passage percolation and continuous greedy paths model: linear growth. Ann. Appl. Prob. 18, 23002319. Google Scholar
[13] Howard, C. D. and Newman, C. M. (1997). Euclidean models of first-passage percolation. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 108, 153170. Google Scholar
[14] Kallenberg, O. (2002). Foundations of Modern Probability, 2nd edn. Springer, New York. Google Scholar
[15] Kesten, H. (1987). Percolation theory and first-passage percolation. Ann. Prob. 15, 12311271. Google Scholar
[16] Kondratiev, Y. G. and Kutoviy, O. V. (2006). On the metrical properties of the configuration space. Math. Nachr. 279, 774783. Google Scholar
[17] Liggett, T. M. (1985). An improved subadditive ergodic theorem. Ann. Prob. 13, 12791285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Liggett, T. M. (1999). Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes. Springer, Berlin. Google Scholar
[19] Massoulié, L. (1998). Stability results for a general class of interacting point processes dynamics, and applications. Stoch. Process. Appl. 75, 130. Google Scholar
[20] Møller, J. and Waagepetersen, R. (2004). Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL. Google Scholar
[21] Richardson, D. (1973). Random growth in a tessellation. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 74, 515528. Google Scholar
[22] Röckner, M. and Schied, A. (1999). Rademacher's theorem on configuration spaces and applications. J. Funct. Anal. 169, 325356. Google Scholar
[23] Shi, Z. (2015). Branching Random Walks (Lecture Notes Math. 2151) Springer, Cham. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24] Tartarini, D. and Mele, E. (2016). Adult stem cell therapies for wound healing: biomaterials and computational models. Frontiers Bioeng. Biotech. 3, 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00206. Google Scholar
[25] Treloar, K. et al. (2013). Multiple types of data are required to identify the mechanisms influencing the spatial expansion of melanoma cell colonies. BMC Systems Biol. 7, 137. Google Scholar
[26] Vo, B. N., Drovandi, C. C., Pettitt, A. N. and Pettet, G. J. (2015). Melanoma cell colony expansion parameters revealed by approximate Bayesian computation. PLOS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004635. Google Scholar
[27] Waclaw, B. et al. (2015). A spatial model predicts that dispersal and cell turnover limit intratumour heterogeneity. Nature 525, 261264. Google Scholar